Showing posts with label Dick Morris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dick Morris. Show all posts

Monday, November 14, 2016

Editorial: Where Do We Need to tell Trump to Focus?

Editorial


Donald Trump won an electoral college mandate particularly on the issues of immigration enforcement and fairness in trade deals. There were additional issues such as gun rights and pro-life issues.


Immigration was particularly important because if the U.S. keeps bringing in people that will vote for the Democratic party, and for that party's stance on issues, then the Republican party and its platform would become extinct.


Donald Trump needs to focus on entrenching his win,( http://www.vdare.com/articles/i-was-right-that-trump-could-win-and-he-could-do-even-better-in-2020) and part of that strategy means increasing his percentage among the working class in the Rust Belt EVEN MORE!!


In addition, Donald Trump's immediate legislative resistance is likely to be in the Senate due to the filibuster. He needs to tell Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to eliminate it so that his mandate is not thwarted. http://www.dickmorris.com/trumps-first-task-outlaw-filibuster-dick-morris-tv-lunch-alert/


After the focus on these steps, judicial entrenchment, by Supreme Court and all federal Court appointees, can keep his mandate permanent as he signs all the bills for his promises into law!





Monday, October 31, 2016

Editorial: Is America Over if Trump Loses?

Editorial


Is America over if Donald Trump loses? It will be very hard to ever break the Democratic political dominance in the Executive and Judicial Branches if he does lose. If nothing else, the swarms of immigrants who will be brought into the U.S. from Mexico, Syria, and elsewhere will likely overwhelm the historic American electorate. Even if these new immigrants don't believe in the social policy issues of the Democratic party, on issues such as abortion and homosexuality (and it's related issue of transgenderism), they will nevertheless vote for that party because they will assume the other parties are racially biased against them.


So the answer to the question is YES, America is likely over if Trump loses!

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

America: What Have We Become?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the U.S. This follows this post about supergerms. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

Founding father John Adams said that the Constitution of the United States was made for a moral and religious people. That if ever the nation stops being moral and religious, the Constitution would be broken as a whale goes through a net.
He was right. Sadly, we have stopped being a moral and religious people to too great a degree!
Consider the following tragic facts:  54.5 million abortions since Roe v. Wade in 1973 (National Right to Life Fact Sheet). Homosexuality and same-sex marriage is supported by a majority of Americans , half of marriages end in divorce, the highest officers in the nation blatantly lie, laziness is rampant, we have astronomic individual and national debt and there is an overall lack of virtue. These selfish mentalities are the harbingers of the decline of a nation.
Of course, that list doesn’t describe everybody , but in all too many cases it seems the majority of people fall into the description above.

Why are we declining morally?

We have departed from God’s fundamental principles of life.
Our theologians have turned the clear and concrete Ten Commandments into abstractions. The Bible is viewed as full of allegory, story and poetry.
Even as people talk about what would Jesus do (WWJD), hardly anybody actually does what Jesus did do (WDJD).The end result of the latter results in a moral society and the former does not! WWJD leaves the situation open to speculation and convenience.
Whenever mankind departs from the example of Jesus as stated in Scripture, it leads individuals away from the simplicity and clarity of godly principles.
How have we changed from a moral and decent people into an increasingly godless society? How do we biblically justify the murder of millions of babies? We can’t—so we just throw out the Bible.
We change incrementally. A little at a time. Slowly, a tiny step at a time over a long period. Somebody will challenge an established principle with an argument against it.  The thin edge of the wedge of argument and debate is driven in. Everyone has a reason and justification for their position. A war of attrition pursues the goal of changing for the “rights” of non believers. A liberal legal climate encourages loose interpretations of a law and the split of the principle slowly grows wider and wider with each blow on the wedge.
What was once a moral principle firmly established in a mostly religious culture is changed by people pushing for tolerance and compassionate understanding. There is always a reason, always a justification, always a plea. It never ends.  Eventually, people accept the new position and the road to moral decline continues. Things like abortion, divorce, adultery, fornication and “Jimmy has two mommies” become the norm.
The cause of this sad situation is that America is becoming more and more secular.  Fewer and fewer people adhere to Scriptural principles, like the Ten Commandments.  Discipline within churches declines because pastors depend on numbers for their salaries. They don’t hold the line for fear of offending people and a loss of income, and so the moral slump continues.
How do we reverse it? By each individually acknowledging our own faults, sins and shortcomings, and fall on our knees before God in repentance. Return to God and obey Him.

You might also be interested in...

Thursday, September 1, 2016

Current Events & Trends: China's worrying military ambitions

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about China's military and trade. This follows this post about America's demographics. This follows this post about the Lost 10 Tribes.  This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

A major feature article in The Sunday Times of London showed that, as its drophead states, “the test of a new missile is heightening concerns over Beijing's arms build-up” (“China's Carrier Killer Unnerves US Navy,” March 24, 2013). The article continues, “China has successfully tested a 'carrier killer' missile designed to change the military balance of power in Asia by deterring American aircraft carrier operations up to 1,250 miles from Chinese shores.”
Clearly the Chinese military has its aggressive generals. China's Liberation Army Daily opts for an end to “romantic pacifism” and urges “full preparation” for war. A headline in The Wall Street Journal reads, “For Xi, a 'China Dream' of Global Military Power” (Jeremy Page, March 14). The article that follows presents new Communist Party and military chief Xi Jinping as appearing to embrace the hawkish worldview of the nation's generals.
Are we going to see a new, updated version of World War II's old Axis Powers, with China in the role of principal Asian foe rather than an “Americanized” Japan? In World War II the Japanese army invaded China. Will the reverse occur in the future? Time will tell.
Isn't it troubling that the Republic of China holds so many billions of American dollars in its own treasury? Why is America being challenged on so many fronts today—military, economic and otherwise? What is America doing wrong? The answer, as revealed in the Bible, is clearly revealed in the Bible study aid The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy . (Sources: The Sunday Times [London], The Wall Street Journal. )

You might also be interested in...

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

The Iran Nuclear Deal Spiritual Blindness at Work?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Iran. This follows this post about gender blurring.  This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

As more and more details of the Iran nuclear negotiations unfolded over recent months, the questions grew more and more puzzling. Why were the world’s leading powers so eager to cut a deal with an Iranian regime that:
• Has been the world’s foremost sponsor of terrorism,
• Repeatedly threatens to eliminate Israel,
• Routinely refers to the United States as “the great Satan” (and supports mass rallies where people chant “Death to America!”), and
• Has leaders who believe they are divinely destined to initiate a period of worldwide upheaval that will lead to their version of fundamentalist Islam attaining dominance over the entire world.
The Western powers’ surrender to Iranian negotiating demands were equally puzzling. Why did major Western leaders so eagerly line up behind the United States to sign off on an agreement that:
• Provides a dictatorial regime a windfall of more than $100 billion (frozen when Iran took over the U.S. embassy in Tehran in 1979 and imprisoned all embassy personnel for 444 days),
• Relieves economic sanctions (imposed by the UN Security Council due to Iran’s refusal to suspend its nuclear programs),
• Bans American and other Western personnel from inspections of Iranian sites (and allows Iran to do its own inspections of sites where it’s suspected of carrying out banned activities!),
• Allows Iran to purchase advanced military weaponry in a few years,
• Includes secret side deals hidden from the U.S. Congress, and
• Paves Iran’s way to producing (and helps finance) nuclear weapons regardless of whether Iran abides by the terms of the agreement or chooses to cheat.

Why agree to such a one-sided deal?

Why did Western leaders not insist that Iran make concessions of its own, such as halting its support of violent terror groups, freezing or dismantling its ballistic missile programs, ending its threatening behavior toward its neighbors, or truly offering “anytime, anywhere” inspections of its nuclear facilities—especially if they really are entirely for peaceful purposes as Iran claims?
In light of such facts, why would anyone support such an agreement with a foreign power with such a track record?
Some reasons are evident. The European participants in the agreement appear to be motivated mostly by economic greed. They see lifting of sanctions on Iran as a way for European companies to enter a potentially lucrative business market, and they gain access to Iranian oil.
Russia, long familiar with the Middle Eastern adage “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” sees an opportunity to strengthen an enemy of the United States as an opportunity not to be missed, and it sees a huge market for advanced Russian military hardware.
Some believe U.S. President Barack Obama is motivated primarily by a desire to add a notable foreign policy landmark to his presidential legacy, and possibly another Nobel Peace Prize to cap his career.
In any case, what is really at the heart of the matter? The Bible reveals deeper issues— spiritual issues that lie beyond normal human perception.
God’s Word reveals a spiritual dimension to international affairs where unseen spirit beings are at work behind the scenes shaping the world in profound ways (see “Kingdoms at War ” and “An Evil Spirit World: Where Did It Come From? ).
When we see things on the international stage that make no sense on the physical level—such as an international agreement like this that defies all logic and common sense—it is virtually guaranteed that something profound is taking place on the unseen spiritual level, a spiritual dimension revealed in the Bible where spirit beings and forces shape the world to their own ends.
On the physical level, it makes no sense to provide the world’s greatest sponsor of terrorism billions of dollars and a clear path to nuclear weapons—yet that is exactly what world leaders have done! Spiritual forces are at work.
Albert Einstein once defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result. World history has repeatedly shown that appeasing dangerous tyrants—think Adolf Hitler—leads to only greater demands and ultimate disaster.

Spiritual blindness and drunkenness

Another factor ties in closely with this. It’s an additional spiritual component that the Bible calls “drunkenness.” The biblical prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel all used the same term to describe the irrational decision-making of leaders and people who have forsaken and rejected God. They lose their ability to think rationally and reason properly because they have turned their backs on the source of true wisdom.
Notice one such passage in Isaiah describing this spiritual blindness: “Go ahead and be blind. You are stupid, but not from wine! You stagger, but not from liquor! For the Lord has poured out on you a spirit of deep sleep. He has closed the eyes of your prophets and visionaries …
“And so the Lord says, ‘… Because of this, I will once again astound these hypocrites with amazing wonders. The wisdom of the wise will pass away, and the intelligence of the intelligent will disappear.’ What sorrow awaits those who try to hide their plans from the Lord, who do their evil deeds in the dark! ‘The Lord can’t see us,’ they say. ‘He doesn’t know what’s going on!’ How foolish can you be?” (Isaiah 29:9-16, New Living Translation, 2013).
Why are people who certainly should know better—especially prominent leaders—caught up in such self-destructive blindness? The answer is simple. God says it’s because they “have removed their hearts far from Me” (Isaiah 29:13).
A deeper spiritual issue is at work in the Iran treaty. Western leaders have been hell-bent on securing this deal, largely at the behest of President Obama. In the words of the biblical prophets, it is as though they have all become “drunk” and cannot discern the reality of the threat and the dangerous times we live in. Our world will grow only more dangerous as leaders and people become ever more spiritually blind and intoxicated due to sin.
May you have the wisdom and courage to heed your Creator and turn to Him before it’s too late!

You might also be interested in...

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Demand The Department Of Justice Release The Official Report Of Hillary Clinton’s FBI Interview and also Impeach Obama For Iran Ransom Payments!

A timely post from http://www.dickmorris.com about Hillary's e-mails and Obama's ransom. This follows this post about Intolerant Liberalism at Universities. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can follow me here.


Demand The Department Of Justice To Release The Official Report Of Hillary Clinton’s FBI Interview!

By Dick Morris

CLICK HERE NOW Tell The Department Of Justice To Release The Official Report Of Hillary Clinton’s FBI Interview!
The Department of Justice is evaluating whether or not to release the official report of what transpired during Hillary Clinton’s FBI interview about her private email server. FBI Director James Comey promised to release the report — if he was allowed — during his press conference announcing his findings. But now, news reports indicate that the Department of Justice, pressured by the White House, is reconsidering whether to release the report. As citizens, taxpayers, and voters, we the public are entitled to see the report.
WE, the Undersigned, petition the United States Department of Justice to release the report of the FBI interview with Hillary Clinton about her emails and private server. We are entitled to know what she said before we have to decide whether to vote for her.
Please sign this petition and please get as many of your friends and family as possible to sign!
Your signature will count! We will send an email in your name to the Department of Justice telling them of your position!
We’ll add your email address to our Alerts list to keep you posted on progress and let you know if we need to take further action.
Thank you,
Dick Morris

Impeach Obama For Iran Ransom Payments!

By Dick Morris

Dear Friend,
CLICK HERE NOW To Sign The Petition To Impeach Obama For Iran Ransom Payments!
I hope you were as shocked as I was that President Obama paid $400 million in cash to Iran after which the Ayatollah released four American hostages. The Administration maintains the fiction that the payment was not a ransom and reaffirms the US policy against paying ransom. But the fact that the plane did not take off to free the hostages until the moment the other plane carrying the cash arrives makes it look a lot like ransom.
Not only would this transaction violate US law prohibiting payment of ransom, but it would also run afoul of the Iran anti-terrorist sanctions passed in 1996 that preclude any cash payments to Iran or any laundering of cash through third parties.
WE, the Undersigned, petition Congress in general and the House Judiciary Committee and its Chairman, Congressman Bob Goodlatte, to hold hearings to determine if President Obama violated U.S. law in making the payment to Iran and whether such a violation rises to the standard of high crimes and misdemeanors specified in the Constitution as a basis for impeachment.
Please sign this petition and please get as many of your friends and family as possible to sign!
Your signature will count! We will send an email in your name to President Obama and your Senators and Congressman telling him or her of your position!
We’ll add your email address to our Alerts list to keep you posted on progress and let you know if we need to take further action.
Thank you,
Dick Morris


Monday, January 4, 2016

Editorial: DEM Side - Will Hillary lose Iowa & NH?

Editorial

On the GOP side, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are two of the best candidates the GOP has fielded in a long time. They energize the base and show that they are willing to fight for conservative issues. Mr. Trump didn't fold in spite of all of the boycotts, and Mr. Cruz has been a stalwart conservative in the Senate. Most of the other GOP candidates are also fair and worth at least some consideration in this election.

On the DEM side, Mrs. Clinton is the current front-runner. However, even many Dems don't know whether she'll change her position on any issue at any time. Mr. Sanders, even if you don't agree with him, seems like you know where he stands in his Socialist positions. Would it be better for the GOP, or even the USA, if Mr. Sanders, rather than Mrs. Clinton got the DEM nomination?

http://www.dickmorris.com/hillary-hints-at-defeats-in-iowa-and-nh/


Friday, June 5, 2015

Riots threatened if Supreme Court Strikes down Obamacare subsidies. GOP governors urged to call up National Guard ahead of this!

An interesting post from www.dickmorris.com about Obamacare subsidies and the Supreme Court and a possible solution if a legislative solution is allowed and riots don't happen.


Scott Walker’s Problem

By Dick Morris on May 13, 2015
 
 when ObamaCare comes back to Congress after a Supreme Court ruling that could knock out the subsidies for enrollees in the federal exchanges, Cruz will likely shine. It could be his hour. Once the court throws out the subsidies, Republican governors whose states didn’t set up exchanges could be under intense pressure to do so. Between 7 million and 8 million people will be forced to cancel their ObamaCare policies because they won’t be able to afford them without the subsidy. (These, ironically, are usually the same people who had their previous health plans canceled because their coverage wasn’t as broad as President Obama wished).Cruz, Rubio and Paul can win points by pushing for a federal solution that postpones the subsidy cancellation and gives states leeway to decide whether to adopt an ObamaCare exchange within their borders. It was Cruz’s filibuster over ObamaCare that put the Texas senator on the map in the first place. Republicans will demand a full repeal of the Affordable Care Act in the wake of a court decision.
Cruz’s plan is to let each state choose whether it wants to require that people have insurance or not and to specify the minimum acceptable coverage for healthcare plans within their borders. He would make the ObamaCare taxes null and void in states that do not choose to enter into ObamaCare system in the wake of the high court decision.
Ultimately, Cruz will probably win his fight — and will look very good pushing Republican governors and senators to move his way on the issue.


Published on TheHill.com
Being outside of Washington, D.C., is usually an advantage for a presidential aspirant confronting a crowded field of potential Republican candidates. Away from the taint and deal-making in Washington, governors and former governors generally can run against Washington, like George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan did.
But this year is different. Serving in the Senate at this point in the race gives an undeniable advantage to Ted Cruz (Texas), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Rand Paul (Ky.), because the Senate is where the action will be. Congress will dominate the spotlight as it wrestles with NSA reform, the Iran nuclear deal and — most likely — a forced overhaul or even repeal of ObamaCare in the wake of the coming Supreme Court decision in King v. Burwell.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, running from outside the Senate, has no ongoing relevance to the great battles that are shaping up this spring and summer. His work in Wisconsin is largely done. His magnificent reforms are safely enacted and are working. The teachers union in the state is struggling with declining membership and lack of political clout. But there is no Act 2 for Walker to command national attention.
When the Senate focuses on NSA reform, Rubio, Cruz and Paul will be right there at the center of the action. Paul, with his creative fusion of social and economic libertarianism, will enjoy a lot of coverage as he takes the lead in battling for individual liberties. The defense and intelligence communities look their worst when we focus on the issues created by Edward Snowden’s document dump, and Paul will be there to fight the dragon.
Similarly, when ObamaCare comes back to Congress after a Supreme Court ruling that could knock out the subsidies for enrollees in the federal exchanges, Cruz will likely shine. It could be his hour. Once the court throws out the subsidies, Republican governors whose states didn’t set up exchanges could be under intense pressure to do so. Between 7 million and 8 million people will be forced to cancel their ObamaCare policies because they won’t be able to afford them without the subsidy. (These, ironically, are usually the same people who had their previous health plans canceled because their coverage wasn’t as broad as President Obama wished).
Cruz, Rubio and Paul can win points by pushing for a federal solution that postpones the subsidy cancellation and gives states leeway to decide whether to adopt an ObamaCare exchange within their borders. It was Cruz’s filibuster over ObamaCare that put the Texas senator on the map in the first place. Republicans will demand a full repeal of the Affordable Care Act in the wake of a court decision.
Cruz’s plan is to let each state choose whether it wants to require that people have insurance or not and to specify the minimum acceptable coverage for healthcare plans within their borders. He would make the ObamaCare taxes null and void in states that do not choose to enter into ObamaCare system in the wake of the high court decision.
Ultimately, Cruz will probably win his fight — and will look very good pushing Republican governors and senators to move his way on the issue.
Meanwhile, what can Walker do? Here’s where the GOP will feel the lack of the early debates that animated the 2012 Republican primaries. Without spring and summer debates, candidates have to actually do something on the national scale, and that opportunity is denied to Walker by his role as a governor.
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who might also be consigned to the sidelines during these legislative battles, has a fight of his own to wage: his objection to the curbs on elderly entitlements embodied in the Republican budget proposals. This positioning gives him access to senior voters in droves, as well as continuing relevance to national coverage.
But Walker can only govern one state, and his ability to get national coverage for his role in solving state problems is limited.

Friday, November 14, 2014

Forget ObamaCare; It’s Plain Old Medicaid

A timely post about from www.dickmorris.com about Obamacare and Medicaid. This follows this post about one of the early settlers to the U.S. area. 


You can follow me here.


Forget ObamaCare; It’s Plain Old Medicaid

By Dick Morris









Enrollment figures from state ObamaCare exchanges are revealing a pattern that will alter fundamentally the terms of the debate over Obama’s signature health insurance program.
When it was proposed, considered, and enacted, it was seen as a program requiring everybody to buy private insurance on health exchanges or face a fine. Those already covered with “affordable” and sufficiently comprehensive health care policies were exempt from the mandate.
And, oh yes, for the poor, the bill expanded the Medicaid program substantially.
But now experience with ObamaCare sign-ups at local exchanges indicates that it is the Medicaid feature of the program that is attracting the most attention and enrollments.
In Washington State, for example, 88% of the enrollments have been in Medicaid. In Kentucky, 82% were on Medicaid. In New York State, two-thirds of the new enrollments were into the Medicaid program.
Should this trend continue in other states and in federal exchanges — and there is no reason to assume they won’t — ObamaCare will amount to little more than an expansion of Medicaid.
The debate over single payer v private insurance will have been resolved by the lack of interest among the near-poor in the private program and their inability to afford even subsidized premium levels.
ObamaCare will have been a massive expansion of single payer, state-provided coverage and little else.
One can imagine the day when Obama announces proudly that he has extended health coverage to, say, seven million Americans. But an examination of the fine print will reveal that six million will have come through Medicaid. Good, old fashioned Medicaid, a program that has been kicking around for 50 years.
Nationally, 82 million Americans are one Medicaid, making it the largest of our entitlement programs. Only 46 million, by comparison, get Medicare. 47 million get food stamps. 50 million get Social Security. But Medicaid is, by far, the largest program.
By the time it is expanded, as provided in ObamaCare, it will surge to over 100 million in its coverage.
This change in enrollment patterns raises some key questions:
1. Do we need ObamaCare? The massive edifice of exchanges, subsidies, regulations, coverage requirements enacted with ObamaCare are scarcely necessary if they cover only a few million people.
2. What of the implications for state budgets? If ObamaCare is to be largely a Medicaid expansion, what will the impact on state budgets be? Those who enroll under the newly expanded Medicaid eligibility standards will be financed fully by the feds for three years, after which the states will be obliged to chip in 10% for another three years. After that, the funding goes back to the usual federal-state Medicaid match of 1/3 to 1/2 federal funding. Since many states have opted not to expand their Medicaid coverage, this effect will not be universal, but it will be significant.
But the experience of the state exchanges indicates that about a third of the new enrollments are by people who have been eligible all along for Medicaid and just didn’t sign up. Caught up in the hoopla about universal coverage, they are now seeking to enroll in Medicaid. But the states will not get special reimbursement for these new enrollees. The normal Medicaid match of 66-33 or 50-50 will apply, breaking the bank for many states.
So, as it turns out, ObamaCare will be financed in large part by state taxpayers: an outcome nobody had foreseen.


Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Stop Confirmation Of Debo P. Adegbile As Head Of Civil Rights Division Of Justice Department!

A timely post about from www.dickmorris.com about a radical being sent up for Senate confirmation in the Justice Department. This follows this post about immigration's affect on the U.S. This are GOP legislators!  In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.
You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!



Stop Confirmation Of Debo P. Adegbile As Head Of Civil Rights Division Of Justice Department!

By Dick Morris








Dear Friend,
Click Here To Sign The Petition To Stop Confirmation Of Debo P. Adegbile!

President Obama has nominated Debo P. Adegbile to be Deputy Attorney General in charge of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. Adegbile’s former job was to be legal counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. In that capacity, he defended police killer Abu-Jamal during the death penalty phase of his trial. Thanks to Adegbile’s work, Abu-Jamal avoided the death penalty.
Now his nomination is being challenged by the widow of the slain officer, Maureen Faulkner, and by Democratic Senator from Pennsylvania Bob Casey who broke with Obama over the issue.
Some say anyone is entitled to a legal defense, but Adegbile was not Abu-Jamal’s defense lawyer. He intervened voluntarily to stop the Black Panther leader and cop-killer from paying for his crime with his life. I don’t think a man like this belongs in the Department of Justice.
Please sign this petition to stop Adegbile’s confirmation. We will forward your signature to your Senators to vote against his confirmation.
Click Here To Sign The Petition To Stop Confirmation Of Debo P. Adegbile!

Friday, March 8, 2013

After Chavez’ Death, A New Burst Of Freedom

A very interesting post from www.dickmorris.com about the state of Latin America after the death of Hugo Chavez. This follows this post book to read about Latin American socialism. You can get this at your library here or from a bookstore such as Amazon at the links below.  This follows this post about a race hoax at U.T. Austin.  This follows this post about Emmit Till. In the meantime, you can read two very interesting books HERE.

After Chavez’ Death, A New Burst Of Freedom


By Dick Morris
Ding, dong the wicked witch is dead! Or his male equivalent. It couldn’t happen to a nicer guy!



Chavez ruled an empire which included effective and total control over the governments of Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia and very substantial influence over Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Uruguay, and Argentina. His nine nation block stands for tyranny, oppression, and authoritarian rule purchased by massive recycling of our oil cash to purchase food, clothing, and medical care for the poor — giving them everything they need but freedom, a job, independence, and dignity.



He died just in time. By 2016, the U.S. will have no need of his oil. He used to produce three million barrels of oil a day. New he produces only 1.5 million (after he nationalized his oil industry and chased everyone with any ability out of the country). We import 1.1 million barrels, the bulk of his production. In three years, our domestic sources plus those of Canada will fully replace Venezuelan imports. With especially heavy oil which only specially built refineries can handle, he would have found no other markets. Now, of course, his tyrannical regime, held in power by military force and phony elections, may give way to a democratic regime and we will have no need to cut off oil purchases.



We need to do all we can to encourage democratic rule in Venezuela now that God has laid the source of our troubles low.



But, behind the brutal trade of food for freedom that Chavez offered lies the unmet needs of an entire continent. Why are South and Central America so poor? They have followed neither the models of Mexico nor of Brazil.



Mexico is becoming a middle class country due to NAFTA and its deepening economic relationship with the United States, Europe, and China. Particularly with us. By contrast, Latin America only sells us as much as it buys from us each year. No trade surplus. If oil is subtracted, we have a surplus over them! But Mexico shows, as Japan, Germany, Taiwan, Korea, China and India have already demonstrated that trade with the U.S. plus foreign direct investment are the path out of poverty.



Nor have they followed the Brazilian model of energy independence, off shore oil drilling, domestic economic growth, and regional free trade.



Now is the time for Latin America to wake up and move out of poverty, not through the old combination of commodity dependence and societal exploitation, but by opening the kind of economic relationships with foreign investors and customers that have propelled a billion people out of poverty in the past two decades in Asia.



Now that Chavez is dead, we can do business.



Monday, November 7, 2011

Texas constitutional amendment election‏

A very interesting post from http://www.empowertexas.com/ about the constitutional election in Texas. This follows this post about the about the November 8 election in Ohio. This follows this post about the election in Mississippi and  this post about the election in Kentucky! This follows this previous article about encouraging American energy independence. This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran  and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book  HERE!

Texas constitutional amendment election‏


Texans are going to polls to consider 10 propositions amending the state’s constitution. The amendments cover everything from water debt to veterans’ property taxes.




You can find our complete listing of the amendments, our take and recommendation, by visiting our website. There, you can also find a handy sample ballot noting our recommended positions.



The Bad

The worst of the amendments are Propositions 2, 3, 4 and 6.



Propositions 2 and 3 would set in place permanent debt – allowing government agencies to issue bonds over and over without ever having to approach the citizens again for a vote. That’s an incredibly irresponsible way for government to treat debt.



Proposition 4, meanwhile, would open the door to Texas’ counties taking private property for the same kind of “economic development” reasons that has sparked so much outrage in cities across the country. We should be curtailing the ability of government to take private property, not increasing it.



Meanwhile, Proposition 7 would allow an El Paso County entity to start levying property taxes. We should be moving away from property taxes, not getting more governments hooked on them.



Finally, Proposition 6 would endanger the long-term viability of the state’s Permanent School Fund. It would allow a larger portion of the fund to be tapped for expenditure in the short-term, meaning fewer dollars would be available to grow the corpus and keep the fund viable into the future.



Neutral

We are neutral on Propositions 8, 9 and 10, but do offer a summary on our website of what supporters and opponents are saying about them.



The Good

Finally, we are supporting Propositions 1 and 5.



Proposition 1 would recognize the sacrifice made by our 100% disabled veterans by granting a property tax exemption to them and their surviving spouses. The fine men and women who serve our nation by defending our liberties, and then find themselves fully disabled as a result, all too often find federal services difficult to access. Providing some property tax relief through Proposition 1 can at least allow Texas to step in where Uncle Sam too often has failed.



Proposition 5 will allow cities and counties to enter into cost-savings interlocal agreements of a year or longer without having to classify them as expenses if they are not. In the past, such agreements had been counted as debt and have a portion of their tax revenues set aside to cover it. But for those agreements that result in cost-savings, the old state of the law got in the way.



Hopefully, Proposition 5 will result in more local government seeking sensible agreements that save money and improve services.



All of us at Texans for Fiscal Responsibility encourage you to utilize the resources of various organizations to study these propositions and their impact on the Lone Star State. And, most importantly, we encourage you to participate in the Nov. 8 constitutional amendment election.



For Texas,

Michael Quinn Sullivan

& the http://www.empowertexans.com/ Team

Friday, November 4, 2011

THE OHIO SHOWDOWN ON NOVEMBER 8TH

A very interesting post from http://www.dickmorris.com/ about the about the November 8 election in Ohio. This follows this post about the election in Mississippi and  this post about the election in Kentucky! This follows this previous article about encouraging American energy independence. This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran  and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book  HERE!

THE OHIO SHOWDOWN ON NOVEMBER 8TH

http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/the-ohio-showdown-on-november-8th/

Dear Friend,




Next week, democracy goes up on trial in Ohio.



After the legislature, led by Governor John Kasich, courageously clipped the wings of union power, the public employee unions are bidding to roll back and repeal his law in a public referendum to be held on Tuesday.



The Ohio law they are seeking to kill:



* Limits teacher tenure so we can discharge bad teachers





* Authorizes payment based on merit, not just on seniority



* Requires employee contributions to pension and health insurance



* Eliminates mandatory dues collection, leaving it up to each public worker to give or not give to his union



* Removes most management issues from collective bargaining.



The upshot of the referendum is whether the unions or the taxpayers and voters control local government.



But there is more on the line for the rest of us who do not live in Ohio. If labor is able to strike the Ohio reforms and win a referendum there, legislators throughout the nation will be hesitant to pass reforms of their own. The entire movement toward educational reform and quality will be held in check and unions will reign over local governments. Their dues will continue to fund liberal candidates throughout the nation and they will continue to provide the backbone of financial support for the left/liberal movement.



Polls show the unions winning in the referendum. In our previous e mail, we raised enough to saturate the Cincinnati media area but we want to expand in the coming weeks to other parts of the state. Please donate to keep the education reforms alive!



PLEASE send us your donations! – Go Here Now.



Thank you,



Dick Morris



PLEASE send us your donations! – Go Here Now.



Paid for by Citizens United (http://www.citizensunited.org/ ) and not affiliated with any Issue 2 Campaign or Committee. David N. Bossie, President, 1006 Pennsylvania Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20003.