Friday, September 19, 2014

The God Particle

An interesting article from about the God Particle. This follows this post about the Three Overturns of the Royal Family. This follows this post about the Feast of Trumpets. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.

The God Particle

Scientists fear space and time could fly apart if too much energy is applied to the Higgs Boson, considered to be the fundamental basis for matter. Could this happen?

Media Download Options [ Download Media: right-click on link ]
MP4 Video
MP4 Video - Low Quality
MP3 Audio - The God Particle

[Darris McNeely] An article came across my desk this morning that said that it could be possible for space and time to collapse if a particular particle called the Higgs boson had too much energy applied to it. Interesting concept, the idea that the universe would collapse because of time and space just simply disappearing if too much energy took place on something that is called the "God Particle". Everyone's favorite physicist Stephen Hawking wrote a introduction to a new book that's coming out in few weeks that is talking once again about this particular piece of energy or matter that was predicted, and a few years ago was actually found, called the Higgs boson.
Now, this is a very interesting term – don't get scared, it's such a unknown term, the Higgs boson – but what the Higgs boson really is, in essence, is the very fabric of energy that holds together the universe. That's about as simply as I can put it. Scientists believe that at the moment of the Big Bang, when the universe came into existence, energy and mass were created and held together by something that they call this particular Higgs boson or what it has been more popularly called, the God Particle – the very fabric of space, of matter, that they predicted would be there a few years ago. And again, in 2012, because of a huge machine that they built over in Switzerland that applied a great deal of energy to electrons – and a great force field was created – they actually proved that it existed. Now, Professor Hawking is saying that if too much energy were applied to it, that it could get out of control and space and time would collapse.
It's a fascinating subject and topic, as is the study of cosmology, and what scientists do know about our universe and are discovering almost every day with articles like this. You know, one of the things that can put the fear into a headline – and people perhaps don't have a combination of reason and faith as their foundation – is that what if something like this did happen? What if scientists got out of control and just ripped the fabric of the universe apart. Is it possible?
Well, I suppose theoretically, according to their formulas, it could be possibly done as well as so many other drastic scenarios that they predict will eventually happen as the universe expands to a point where something else more drastic will happen, but that's where, quite frankly, the matter of faith comes in, and those who do believe that there is a Creator God behind this universe can take great comfort and encouragement, as well as design and understanding, in what God does say about His role in the creation of the universe and also keeping it together because that's really what this is all about here – the idea of, can man by his own efforts destroy the universe? Don't worry; we can't.
In Hebrews:1:3, it makes a statement about God: "who being the brightness of His glory and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by the word of His power, when He had by Himself purged our sins, sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high" – speaking of Jesus Christ, "who upholds all things by His power." Something that science hasn't yet discovered is that power by which God does uphold all things. We don't need to worry that some unknown force or energy – something that science calls the God Particle, or Higgs boson – if put into an unstable state, would destroy the universe. We don't need to worry about that. God is in control, just as He was when it was all created. That's encouraging and that's comforting.
That's BT Daily . Join us next time.

Is Miley Cyrus the only one protesting Mexico's Meddling?

An interesting article from about Miley Cyrus. This follows this post about stealth amnesty.  
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.

Miley Cyrus Gets Spanked With Mexican Flag, Local Govt Requests Jail Time and Fine

Miley Cyrus' Twerking Could Land Her in Mexican Jail
Ora TV
Miley Cyrus has landed herself in hot water with the Mexican government after twerking with a flag during a Mexican Independence Day performance. A state legislature has asked the federal government to fine the...

Mexican officials reportedly want Miley Cyrus prosecuted and fined for disrespecting their national symbol on Mexican Independence Day.

The former Disney star was engaging in one of her infamous "twerking" episodes while promoting the "Bangerz" tour in Monterrey, Mexico this past Tuesday when, suddenly, a dancer smacked her prosthetic butt with a Mexican flag.

Cyrus didn't seem phased, judging from her social media activity during her Mexico visit.

That shit was raw as hell. 2nd time I ever played that song in that recording. Y'all just so used to all the bull shit. But thank you :)
— Miley Ray Cyrus (@MileyCyrus) September 17, 2014

show day #2 in Monterey needa get my unicorn ass up and at em
— Miley Ray Cyrus (@MileyCyrus) September 17, 2014

Neuvo Leon state officials are not pleased and demand that she be rightfully punished, which could mean a 36-hour jail sentence along with a $1,200 fine.

Related Video
Miley Cyrus -- Mexican Flag Ass Stunt Triggers...
Miley Cyrus could go to jail for getting her ass whipped on stage ... with a Mexican flag. Miley was performing Tuesday night in Monterrey, Mexico when one of her dancers spanked her prosthetic butt with a Mexican...

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Three overturns of the Royal Family!

An interesting article from about the Three Overturns of the Royal Family. This follows this post about parenting. This follows this post about Scotland. his follows this post about the Feast of Trumpets. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.

Three overturns

But couldn’t the throne have been transferred elsewhere for a long time before being transferred to the British Isles? The indirect answer from prophecy seems to be no.

In Ezekiel:21:26-27, God declared that Zedekiah was to "remove the diadem and take off the crown: This shall not be the same [a change or transfer was occurring]; exalt him that is low [the Zarhite ruler in Israel] and abase him that is high [Zedekiah of the line of Perez]. I will overturn, overturn, overturn it [the crown, that is, the throne]; and it shall be no more [overturned] until HE come whose right it is; and I will give it HIM [Christ]" (KJV).
Notice that the final "overturned" was added in brackets for the sake of clarity. Some see this verse as a prophecy of the overthrow of the crown—that it would "be no more" (meaning no longer exist) until Christ came to claim it. Yet this cannot be the meaning of this prophecy or God would be breaking His unbreakable promise to David of an unbreakable dynasty. So the overturning must refer to removing the throne from one nation and raising it up in another. And the mentioning of overturn three times would certainly seem to be saying that such overturning would occur three times—that three times the throne would be transferred to another nation and that it wouldn’t be transferred again until Jesus Christ’s coming in power and glory to take it over.
When was the last time another country’s monarchy was transplanted into the throne’s present location in England? The answer is 1603, when King James VI of Scotland became King James I of Great Britain (the one who commissioned the King James Bible). This is obviously the last overturn to have taken place. Because of it, today’s British monarchs are of Scottish royal descent.
Prior to that, was another country’s throne ever transplanted into Scotland? Yes. The throne of the Scoti (as the Irish were anciently called) was moved from Ireland into southwest Scotland in the late fifth century—their kingdom of Dalriada in that area, centered at Iona (a name perhaps related to Ionia of Greece), eventually growing to envelop what is now Scotland. This was clearly the previous overturn—which is why Scotland’s monarchy, which became Britain’s monarchy, was actually Irish.
Now since these were the last two overturns of three, there can only have been one other—the first. And that first overturn had to have been the transfer of the throne from Judah. Thus it should be clear that this transfer must have been from Judah to Ireland. Had the throne been transferred from Judah to some other country before later being reestablished in Ireland, that would add a fourth overturn—when Scripture appears to allow for only three. By simple deduction, the three overturns must have been: 1) Judah to Ireland; 2) Ireland to Scotland; 3) Scotland to England.
It should be mentioned, though, that in the first overturn it is possible that the daughter of Zedekiah married into the Milesian Zerah line in Spain or elsewhere around the time it was in the process of assuming control over Ireland. This would not be adding another overturn from Spain to Ireland, as it would all be part of the same overturn. Whether or not this happened, however, is dependent on exactly when the Milesians from Spain took over Ireland, which is not entirely clear. They may have already become established in Ireland before Jeremiah’s journey—though perhaps still maintaining control over part of Spain when he arrived. Again, however, it is possible that Zedekiah’s daughter and Jeremiah actually accompanied the Milesians in their invasion of Ireland from Spain.

What's the matter with Oklahoma?‏

An interesting article from about Oklahoma's GOP. This follows this post about Obama's post-election amnesty. This follows this post about the midterm elections that you should begin supporting your closest candidates for! Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.

Memo From Middle America | Why Oklahoma’s 100% GOP Delegation Is Useless On Immigration—A Red State Case Study

My home state of Oklahoma is perhaps the reddest of the red states. So why are its elected officials so ineffective in combatting America’s immigration disaster?
The GOP’s dominance of Oklahoma is really amazing in a state that was Democratic within living memory: in both the 2008 and 2012 Presidential elections, the GOP won every single one of Oklahoma’s 77 counties. Its congressional delegation is 100% Republican—five Republican congressmen and two Republican senators. The Governor, Mary Fallin, is Republican. The Lieutenant Governor, the Secretary of State, the State Auditor and Inspector, the Attorney General, the State Treasurer, the State School Superintendent, the Labor Commissioner, the insurance commissioner, and all four corporation commissioners, are all Republicans. Republicans have a majority in both the state Senate and House of Representatives.
So, since Republican candidates in Oklahoma don’t have to worry so much about winning elections, shouldn’t they be leaders in the fight for the traditional American nation?
It hasn’t worked out that way. Of course, as we know all too well, being a Republican doesn’t necessarily mean defending the historic American nation. In fact, Republicans like George W. Bush have been at the forefront of dismantling it.
And the current national GOP leadership is obviously on the wrong side of the National Question. If they were merely useless, that would be an improvement.
But out in Red State America, there are elements of the GOP that could lead a patriotic movement, working for an immigration shutdown and thereby appealing to the white working class vote, which could either take over the GOP or form a new party. Examples: Jeff Sessions, Lou Barletta, Kris Kobach.
There should be more. And Oklahoma isn’t helping.
Senators Jim Inhofe and Tom Coburn are good guys, considered among the most conservative members of Congress. But they really don’t get the National Question.
Senator Inhofe currently has a B+ from NumbersUSA—the highest rating of any member of the Oklahoma delegation. Senator Coburn (who is stepping down at the end of this year) has a B.
Yes, there are some positive National Question steps Inhofe has taken. He is very supportive of Official English, having introduced a bill to make English the official federal language. He has done some good work on the Minors-Invading-the-Border Fiasco, actually visiting the border, talking to some of the kids and pointing out that, in effect, Obama invited these invaders. He can be counted on to vote against Amnesty, and atrocities like that.
But Inhofe won’t even consider a reduction in legal immigration. In writing to a constituent, he goes off on the time-honored “nation of immigrants” spiel and talks about his own German immigrant grandparents. None of that is relevant today.
Inhofe is fascinated with foreign policy and the military. But he seems stuck in the heady days of the Reagan era—great days in a lot of ways, but over.
Thus Inhofe can usually be counted on to support the latest intervention in the Middle East in the name of freedom and democracy, but he can’t seem to make the connection between what’s going on over there, what could go on over here, and what’s already going on over here.
Senator Inhofe is very concerned about the Islamic State (ISIS, or ISIL), and has introduced legislation authorizing the use of force against the group. [Inhofe offers third bill authorizing military force against ISIS,By Martin Matishak, The Hill, September 9, 2014] But it seems that ISIS has taken Inhofe’s attention away from our own border—although border laxness and immigration policy pose a bigger existential threat to the U.S.A. than does the Islamic State.
Speaking of ISIS and such groups, Senator Inhofe declared that “we’re in the most dangerous position we’ve ever been in as a nation.”
So why isn’t Inhofe concerned about the growth of Islamic radicalism inside the United States, the growth of Sharia law etc., driven by the importation of 100,000 Muslims annually? Because it would call into question those platitudes about the Nation of Immigrants?
Imhofe says about the Islamic State militants, that “they’re crazy out there, and they’re rapidly developing a method of blowing up a major US city.”
Well, maybe, but why allow their co-religionists into our country, especially given our non-existent selection process?
Of course, with Senator Inhofe, it’s a partisan thing. In classic Conservatism, Inc. fashion, he blames Obama: “…the problem is, the president, quite frankly, he says all these things and he never does them.” [Inhofe: ISIS 'Rapidly Developing A Method Of Blowing Up A Major Us City', Breitbart, August 21, 2014]
Inhofe, by the way, supports the NSA surveillance programs. But all the surveillance programs in place didn’t prevent the Boston Bombers nor the Major Hasan shooting. And a growing Muslim population is going to make it even harder.
Senator Inhofe is the odds-on favorite to win re-election this November, against Democratic opponent Matt Silverstein who, interestingly, is a Jewish Choctaw.
How about the rest of the Oklahoma delegation? Coburn, who has a B from Numbers USA, has cancer and is resigning. He is likely to be replaced by
  • District congressman James Lankford, who has a B from Numbers USA. Fourth District Congressman Tom Cole has a B-.
The cellar is rounded out by three whose NumbersUSA ranking is a dismal D+:
Representatives Cole and Mullin are the only two registered “Native Americans” in Congress. Look at their pictures and try to estimate how much actual American Indian ancestry each has!
Tom Cole, Chickasaw
Tom Cole, Chickasaw
Markwayne Mullin, Cherokee
Markwayne Mullin, Cherokee
Cole has been one of the leaders in the war against the Washington Redskins team name—which, according to polling, is unobjectionable to 90% of American Indians. [The Politics of the Washington Redskins Name Controversy, By Harry Enten, FiveThirtyEight, June 20, 2014]
I guess Cole thinks it’s a good opportunity to trade on his Native American identity and score some PC points. [Lawmakers Press N.F.L. on Name Change for Washington Redskins,By Emmarie Huetteman, NYT, February 9, 2014]
But are either of these “Native American” congressman aware that Hispanics recently surpassed American Indians in the Oklahoma population?
And if in the future Hispanics take over this country, will they honor American Indian tribal treaty rights?
These are more important issues than the mascot of a professional sports team.
Rep. Lucas’ main emphasis is bringing home the bacon for farmers. Of course, if he really wanted to help preserve American family farms rather than Agribusiness, he’d be in the forefront of fighting cheap illegal alien labor.
Representative Bridenstine, another of the D+ Trio, did speak against Fort Sill being used as an illegal alien dumping ground. But he hasn’t shown leadership on the big picture.
So Oklahoma’s seven elected federal officials seem to be good guys. No doubt they do some good things. They’re not positively bad on immigration—they’re just useless (see above) in regard to the principal threat to our nation—the demographic replacement of the historic American people.
Why? One reason may simply be laziness. Oklahoma is now an easy state for the GOP to win, they don’t see the need to push the envelope. And there is PC cowardice.
Plus I believe there is a subconscious factor—what is sometimes called “Cultural Cringe.” Though they won’t admit it, conservative politicians from Flyover Country—the Midwest, Great Plains States, the West and the South—are often afraid to be “extreme” because they don’t want people on the East Coast to think that we’re backward rednecks out here.
And that’s ridiculous, because East Coast liberals are going to think that we’re a bunch of backward rednecks out here no matter what we do.
So why not do the right thing—and save the country?
American citizen Allan Wall (email him) moved back to the U.S.A. in 2008 after many years residing in Mexico. Allan`s wife is Mexican, and their two sons are bilingual.  In 2005, Allan served a tour of duty in Iraq with the Texas Army National Guard. His VDARE.COM articles are archived here; his articles are archived here ; his News With Views columns are archived here; and his website is here.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

How can I control my anger when I get frustrated and stressed by my kids?

An interesting article from about parenting. This follows this post bout Mexico. This follows this post about Scotland. his follows this post about the Feast of Trumpets. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.

How can I control my anger when I get frustrated and stressed by my kids?

Few relationships can produce more challenges and frustrations than the parent-child relationship. What can we do when love and anger collide in the family? Here are some parenting tips.

Answer: Even the most loving parents will experience anger every now and then toward their children. However, uncontrolled anger can affect your ability to make good decisions as well as maintain a positive relationship with your son or daughter.
Allowing yourself to "blow up" at your child can be very harmful if it occurs repeatedly. In your anger, you may say things that frighten your child or affect his or her self-esteem, or you could even physically harm him or her. Uncontrolled anger also provides an inappropriate role model for your child by teaching him or her that anger outbursts are acceptable.
It can be difficult to control yourself when you become angry. However, the Bible tells us that a wise person maintains self-control. Proverbs:29:11 states, "A fool vents all his feelings, but a wise man holds them back." Also, Ecclesiastes:7:9 says, "Do not hasten in your spirit to be angry, for anger rests in the bosom of fools."
What can we do when we get mad at our kids? Below are several parenting tips that will assist us in managing our anger.

Pause for a moment.

When you feel yourself becoming angry, it is wise to pause before you say or do anything. This pause could consist of merely taking a deep breath or slowly counting to 10. Pausing can help you to address the situation calmly instead of in a fit of anger.
During this pause quickly think about the circumstances and try to determine what is really happening. Is your anger a reaction to your child's behavior? Or is something else bothering you such as work stress, tiredness or other problems? Has your son or daughter intentionally tried to hurt or disobey you, or is his or her behavior typical for a child of that age? Is this your problem, your child's problem or both?

Take a parental or child time-out.

In situations where you are very angry, realize that it will take some time to cool off. Time-outs model an appropriate way to handle anger. It can be good for your child to see you get angry and demonstrate a socially acceptable way to deal with these feelings.
You may even tell your child that "Mother is angry and needs a time-out." Don't tell your child that you are angry because he or she is stupid or bad, for such labeling is not healthy for your child's self-esteem. Your time-out could even involve stress-reducing activities such as walking, punching a pillow in private, taking a bath or talking to your spouse or a friend about the situation.
Instead of a parental time-out, you may also opt for a time-out for your child as part of his or her punishment. While your son or daughter is sitting in the corner, you will also have time to cool off and decide the best course of action.

Resolve to never strike your child in anger.

Never discipline your kids when you are angry and unable to control your feelings. While spanking in an appropriate manner is supported in Scripture, it is unwise to spank your child while you are angry. You could accidentally bruise him or her by spanking too hard. This could lead to your child being taken from your home by social services.
If at any time you feel the urge to strike your child, get out of the room as soon as possible. If your child is too young to leave alone for a few minutes, be sure to put him or her in the crib or a playpen or have someone else watch your child. Older children should just be told that you are angry and need a time-out. Stay away until you have calmed down. Pray for God to help you to control your anger and respond in a godly manner.

Form plans for how you will react.

Determine how you want to respond to your child or the problem. Your plan should take into account what you want him or her to learn from this, as well as how to prevent this misbehavior from happening again.
If your child has been told that he or she would be punished for this misbehavior, it is important that you follow through with your word. Children need to learn that there are consequences to their actions. If you have not set formal rules for this misbehavior, plan how you will do it now. Put together a list of family rules, and state the consequences for not following the rules. You may want to consult various parenting books for ideas about methods of discipline that may prove to be effective for your child.

Act and don't react to the situation.

After you have cooled off, analyzed the situation and determined the best plan of action, it is time to act. Your actions must be calm and loving. If you punish your child, be sure that you also explain exactly why he or she is receiving a punishment. As always, tell your child that the discipline is to help him or her and is a consequence of his or her misbehavior.
To raise an emotionally well-developed child, it is important to show unconditional love. For example, tell your son or daughter, "I still love you, even though I am now angry about your misbehavior." It is also important to hug your child and reassure him or her after you have punished him or her for misbehaving.
Anger is a God-given emotion. It can even be used to correct wrong or evil and set things right, as in the case where Christ was angry (Matthew:21:12-14). But God also tells us, "A quick-tempered man acts foolishly" (Proverbs:14:17).
The relationship that you have with your children can be one of life's greatest blessings. If you want to be wise in your responsibility of caring for them, learn to manage your anger. You both will be happier when you are in control of your emotions.
Linda LaBissoniere, M.Ed., licensed counselor