Showing posts with label #FakeNews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #FakeNews. Show all posts

Friday, December 16, 2016

YET ANOTHER person leaving Facebook!

A timely post from www.freedomfeens.com about why someone left Facebook. This follows this post about mysticsim, Dr. Strange, and Star Wars. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can follow me here.


Why I Left Facebook, and where to find me online

me-no-Fbook
I’ve always thought it was pathetic when people scream “I’m leaving Facebook!”….or MySpace, or however far you want to take it back….I even saw this before the World Wide Web, on newsgroups, in 1990. But it’s only pathetic when people’s reasons for leaving are the usual “No one likes me! And people are mean to me!” Those are not my reasons for leaving Facebook. In fact, a lot of people like me on Facebook. I have 2200 “friends” on there. And a lot of them are people I enjoy talking with.
I find it interesting that you can’t just delete your Facebook account. It takes 14 days. Reminds me of a nanny waiting period to buy a gun. Facebook knows how annoying it is, and like the drug dealer giving out free samples to a junkie who gets off junk, Facebook says “You’ll be back…..” and tries to entice you not to leave. Sort of how some states make you be separated for a while before they’ll “grant” you a divorce. Anyway, if you do want to leave Facebook, here’s how to do it. (Skip step one there, and before you delete your account, delete all your photos. Who knows if Facebook will decide they own those at some point.)
So, if you’d like to know why I’m leaving Facebook, and where you can find me, read on…..

WHY I’M LEAVING FACEBOOK, EFFECTIVE NOON TOMORROW (12/19/2012):
1. Facebook is starting to act like The State. Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, has updated their “user agreement” to say that they can sell any of your photos and not pay you. And they can use photos of your face. They could sell a photo of you smiling with a gun to an anti-gun campaign. If you’re overweight, you could end up in the “before” photo for a weight loss pill. etc. etc.
In saying that they can change their user agreement this drastically, and that you’ve already agreed by being a member, they are acting like The State with its “Social Contract.” That is, Facebook is acting like the government. Even though Facebook has backtracked due to public outrage, that sounds to me like what politicians do right before an election. Do I really wanna trust someone who figuratively says “Well, we were gonna rape you, but you complained and people are watching, so we’ll wait and rape you later”? (It’s ironic that so many statists are among the outraged, because they don’t realize this is EXACTLY how all governments behave.)
2. I waste a lot of time on Facebook. I used to write books that I was paid to write, but I spend so much time on Facebook that I’ve stopped writing books. You could say “Why not just spend less time on there?” but that’s like giving a junkie a brick of drugs and saying “just use this once in a while.” While this is my problem, not Facebook’s problem, my solution is to leave. I’ll probably go through “withdraw” for a little while, but then I’ll go back to actually producing things instead of wasting time on Facebook.
3. Facebook is censoring people. They are suspending accounts of people who do not tow the mainstream media line on current events.
4. Facebook is hypocritical. They are suspending accounts of people who post political ideas that Facebook does not like. Then they tell those people “Facebook is not a place for politics”, when in fact, Facebook was spamming me for Obama right before the election.
5. Facebook is spying on you. Of course these days, you are being spied on everywhere, all the time, by governments and corporations, but Facebook is the worst of the worst. And their privacy settings are useless.
6. I don’t want to talk to a lot of the people on Facebook. But they want to talk to me, and foist their opinions on everything at me, and they’re usually wrong. It’s annoying. But it goes beyond annoying sometimes. I’ve had death threats simply for my political beliefs from strangers who would never have even heard of me if I weren’t on Facebook. Like I said in one of my books ten years ago, “The great thing about the Internet is that everyone in the world can talk to you. The horrible thing about the Internet is that everyone in the world can talk to you.” This is more true on Facebook than anywhere. It’s set up for that. None of those people would bother trying to find my e-mail and bug me, but on Facebook, that’s just part of what people do. It’s part of the business model.
7. FACEBOOK USERS AS A WHOLE SEEM FAR MORE INTERESTED IN SPREADING FEAR THAN DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT. This statement isn’t singling out any individual users, and there are exceptions. But as an entity, the collective mind of Facebook is far more into yelling “THE SKY IS FALLING!” than putting on a hard hat to protect their head from falling sky pieces. The final straw, for me, was when I posted two things on the same day…The first was a link to an article about new ways the government is planning to read your e-mail. The second was a link to an article we wrote on setting up encrypted e-mail so the government can’t read your e-mail. The thing about government reading your e-mail got 170 likes and 76 shares. The piece about actually DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT got ten likes and 3 shares. To me, that says all you need to know about Facebook and why you shouldn’t be on there. Most people on Facebook would rather live in a fear-spiral echo chamber than actually DO ANYTHING to protect themselves. I call it “Fear porn”, and it’s not a type of porn I’m interested in consuming.
8. I’d rather spend my time and effort building my own sites than building someone else’s business model for free. Especially when that “someone else” is a company like Facebook that has no respect, and apparently has absolute contempt, for its “customers.”
WHERE TO FIND ME:
I’m not leaving the Internet. I love the Internet. I’ve been on it since 1990 (before the World Wide Web), and I’m still going to be around. I just hate Facebook. You can find me on Twitter, here. You can find Freedom Feens, my thrice-weekly podcast with Neema Vedadi, here. You can subscribe to that via RSS or iTunes, and post comments on the site, and I sometimes comment back. You can subscribe to the torrent link here. (Please seed Feens episodes for when the Central Scrutinizer declares free speech illegal, deletes our website, and throws us in camps.) You can find my interview podcast, Anarchy Gumbo, here.
You can find my past media here, and my e-mail address here. (Though please submit news items for the Feens here, rather than via e-mail.) You can find my encrypted e-mail and PGP key here. If I know you well and you use private i.m. via Pidgin, you probably already have my Pidgin address. I don’t give it out to many people.
Only about five people have my phone number, and I don’t talk to people much on the phone, but you can call the Feens number during our live shows, info is here. During Feens Live shows, I’m also on the Feens chat page (my user name is MichaelFeen), and I occasionally pop in there at other times. I write for the Freedom Feens blog (the thing you’re reading right now), and you can comment on here, and I sometimes comment back. I’ll also start posting photos of my cats here sometimes, that was always a favorite on Facebook, and I know it helps power the Internet and keeps the tubes from getting slow.
Skype is not a good way to find me except during the Feens live shows. I never turn Skype on unless I’m doing a show, and I never check my Skype messages. I am on YouTube, but that’s a bad way to contact me. I rarely answer on there, but you can enjoy my videos. I have a Google+ account, but I never check it and will probably be deleting that too.
You can listen to us 24/7 (and occasionally live) on Freedom Feens Radio.
Even with all the above, that’s much more manageable than being on Facebook. Facebook is a time suck.
There is a Freedom Feens Facebook page that’s run by fans, but not by me. Apparently there will be some Feens updates there.
So anyway, that about covers it. Enjoy Facebook if you stay. It’s useful for some people. But I’ve got things to do, and roads to build.
–Michael W. Dean

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

How Authentic Is the Christmas Portrayal of Christ's Birth?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Jesus Christ and Christmas. This follows this post about slavery. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

This holiday season here in the Philippines consumes one third of each year. The Philippines has the fourth largest Christian population on earth. With over 80 million of its people professing to be Christian (mostly Catholic), the “Spirit of Christmas” begins as early as September 1 and doesn’t end until January 6 each year. During this four-month season Christmas carols are played in public and pervade the airwaves. In an effort to authentically portray the birth of Christ, a new movie titled The Nativity Story was released on December 1 for showing in theatres during this year’s Christmas season. Starring Keisha Castle-Hughes as Mary and Oscar Isaac as Joseph with Shohreh Aghdashloo as Elizabeth, movie director Catherine Hardwicke sought to achieve authenticity in the movie’s depiction of the birth of Christ. The shooting location for Bethlehem was done in the village of Matera in Italy (the same location used in filming The Passion of the Christ), while the set for Herod’s castle and the Jerusalem temple was filmed at Ouarzazate in Morocco (the same filming location as The Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven). While the effort to authentically portray Christ’s birth is commendable, the influence of tradition has caused it to stray somewhat from the true biblical account. The movie depicts His birth occurring in a shivering cold, windy and wintry season where fires were essential for keeping people warm. When compared to the carefully detailed account of the gospel writer Luke at least three very important deviations from Scripture stand out. The Roman decree for census and taxation . Let’s remember that with the collective wisdom of Roman tax officials, local Roman administrators made sure their tax collections would occur at the best of times—right after the main fall harvest with still good weather to minimize the potential problems stemming from lack of money or difficulty of travel due to winter conditions (Luke 2:1-5). There was no room in the inn. Why? Lodging at that time was likely filled because of the Jews’ custom to attend the annual fall festivals commanded by God. The Romans would have probably timed such taxation to coincide with the Jews’ annual travel to Jerusalem to observe these festivals (Luke 2:7). Shepherds were out in the fields that night. The weather was still warm enough for shepherds to keep their flock out in the fields at night (Luke 2:8). The Adam Clarke’s Commentary (Abingdon Press, Nashville) notes concerning Luke 2:8, “As these shepherds had not yet brought home their flocks, it is a presumptive argument that October had not yet commenced, and that, consequently, our Lord was not born on the 25th of December, when no flocks were out in the fields … On this very ground the nativity in December should be given up.” Alexander Hislop’s book, The Two Babylons,explains: “In that region, from December to February … the cold of the night was piercing. Thus the shepherds never kept their flocks and herds out in the open country from December through February—it was simply too cold” (p. 2, 1959). Most encyclopedias and similar historical references document that the December 25 nativity tradition is associated with the ancient Saturnalia celebration (for worshipping the pagan god Saturn). All such references (including the Catholic Encyclopedia) admit that Christ was not born on or even near December 25 in the middle of winter! Yet this ancient custom, even if celebrated in gross ignorance of its true pagan origin, refuses to die. Other aspects of Christmas’ celebrations also oppose biblical teachings. Regarding adapting pagan celebrations for the worship of the true God the Bible commands, “… do not inquire … ‘How did these nations serve their gods? I also will do likewise’ … You shall not worship the LORD your God in that way … Whatever I command you be careful to observe it; you shall not add to it nor take away from it” (Deuteronomy 12:30-32) . Jesus Christ also spoke out against seeking to worship God by incorporating pagan customs, “And in vain they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandment of God, you hold the tradition of men …” (Mark 7:7-9). For more informative details on this important subject, just request, read online or download our free booklets: Holidays or Holy Days: Does It Matter Which Days We Keep? and Jesus Christ: The Real Story.

You might also be interested in...

Monday, November 21, 2016

Editorial: Is it #FakeNews, or is it #Censorship?

Editorial

Recently, there has been an attempt by Facebook, Twitter, Google, and others to censor out what they consider "Fake News." Of course, there can occassionaly be some of that, but it seems more like they are censoring out viewpoints that the MSM disagrees with.

These sources ALREADY have a demonstrated Leftist bias. Notice that most of the "Fake News" is that which comes from non-MSN sources, the VERY ones the MSN is already censoring!

 From http://www.alipac.us/ :

Google and Facebook recently announced an effort to crack down on "Fake News" but their targets appear to be the conservative publications that helped elect Donald Trump such as InfoWars, Breitbart, Daily Caller, and World Net Daily. (View Source) Facebook and Google have not mentioned any efforts to silence the fake news coming out of Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and CBS all of which claimed it was statistically impossible for Donald Trump to win the Presidency!

From http://www.vdare.com about President-Elect nominee Jeff Sessions:

Making things easier for the character assassins, Senator Jeff is a white guy from Alabama, which is practically a hate crime all by itself. And making things even easier will be the willingness of the anti-Trump Main Stream Media to believe any kind of story about something the Senator was overheard saying back in 1976, however unsubstantiated.

http://www.vdare.com/articles/dawn-of-the-trumpening-jeff-sessions-for-attorney-general-steve-bannon-for-pope 


From  www.ucg.org :

The Media's Alternative Gospel

The major media news organizations and outlets, says journalist William Proctor, have their own lists of rights and wrongs that they support or condemn through their editorials and reporting. Most follow the lead of the media heavyweight The New York Times , which, he says, has its own list of “sins” that the paper regularly criticizes and attacks. Detailed in his 2000 book The Gospel According to The New York Times , these include, but are not limited to:
  • Religious certainty-especially that rooted in Christianity.
  • Political conservatism in any form.
  • Capital punishment for any reason.
  • Placing any restrictions on freedom of the press, speech or expression.
  • Limiting abortion rights. Conversely, the newspaper's “gospel” is essentially the opposite of these-that is, it continually pushes the viewpoint that:
  • There are no absolutes, particularly when it comes to religious beliefs. We must be tolerant of all other beliefs and behavior (except those based on biblical standards or conservative beliefs).
  • Liberalism is enlightened; conservatism and conservatives are selfish, bigoted and uncaring.
  • Society as a whole is at fault for criminal behavior; therefore the death penalty is inherently unjust.
  • Freedom of the press, expression and speech is virtually absolute and trumps virtually all other rights and restrictions
  • Sexual freedom, including freedom from unwanted consequences such as pregnancy, is an absolute right for everyone.
Lest you think Mr. Proctor's assertions are overstated, carefully examine the news coverage, editorial positions and even the political cartoons in your local newspaper. Odds are you'll find them advocating, subtly or not so subtly, the same editorial and social positions.
You'll see reporting that favors positions such as homosexual rights, diminution of parental discipline and authority, lack of personal responsibility and greater government growth and social spending-all designed to shift your thinking from the standards found in the Bible and toward the alternative gospel such sources want you to believe.
Collectively, today's mass media have become one of the most committed instruments of antibiblical bias that can be found in our world. Their influence in that direction is enormous.

https://www.ucg.org/the-good-news/the-medias-alternative-gospel 

https://www.ucg.org/the-good-news/should-you-believe-all-the-news-you-hear 







The FBI Hate Crimes Stats They’re NOT Telling You About – NOT the Muslims

A timely post from http://www.debbieschlussel.com about true "hate crimes." This follows this post about criminal mayors in the U.S. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can follow me here.


EXCLUSIVE: The FBI Hate Crimes Stats They’re NOT Telling You About – NOT the Muslims

By Debbie Schlussel
islamiccrescent.jpgcolclink.jpg

fbihatecrimesstats


Don’t believe the hype about FBI hate crimes stats. Despite what the media and Muslims whines tell you, the real numbers aren’t about an increase in hate crimes against Muslims. On the contrary, it’s more about how much alleged hate crimes against Muslims pale in comparison to other hate crimes. Here are the real FBI hate crimes statistics they’re not telling you about. Hint: the real victims are NOT Muslims, though they may be the real perpetrators.
Earlier this week, the FBI released its compilation of 2015 hate crimes statistics. And, over the last two days, the media’s echo chamber narrative is that FBI Hate Crime stats are all about Muslims–that Muslims are the real and (if the liberal media emphasis on this is to be believed) the only victims of hate crimes. Nope. Not true.
Most years since the beginning of this site, I’ve looked at and analyzed the statistics released by the FBI. And every single year, it’s been clear: most religious-based hate crimes–by far–are perpetrated against Jews in America, NOT Muslims. The same is true this year. And there are some other key findings in my analysis of these numbers that you should know:
* Hate crimes against Jews are MORE THAN DOUBLE the number of alleged hate crimes against Muslims.
In 2015, there were 664 incidents, 695 offenses, and 731 victims of anti-Jewish hate crimes. This is up from 2014, when there were 609 incidents, 635 offenses, and 648 victims of anti-Jewish hate crimes. That’s an increase of 9% in anti-Jewish hate crimes. Compare that to Muslims, whom the FBI reports had 257 incidents 301 offenses, and 307 victims in 2015. In 2014, these numbers were 154 incidents, 178 offenses, and 184 victims. Yes, there was a marked increase, but still the numbers are relatively very small. With all of the hatred and jihadist attacks perpetrated by Muslims against America and Americans, including on our own soil, it shows that Americans are very nice to Muslims and very forgiving–maybe too much so (which is why we keep getting attacked). The way Muslims portray it, there are constant wildings against them on the streets all over America. Nuh-uh.
In 2015, hate crimes against Jews comprised 53% of all of the 1,244 incidents of hate crimes based on the victim’s religion. In 2014, hate crimes against Jews were 60% of all the 1,014 hate crimes committed based on the victim’s religion. This is the only figure that went down for Jews, but it’s really meaningless. The vast majority of hate crimes in America based on the victim’s religion are still against Jews, NOT Muslims. The media won’t lift a finger to point that out, though. (Which is why I have to.)
This is even more significant when you consider that Muslims claim (though it’s a lie) that they have eight-to-nine-million of their fellow pro-jihadists in the U.S., whereas as there are only 5.2 million Jews in America, if that. Muslims who claim there is rampant “Islamophobia” in America (and–remember!–a phobia is an irrational or unreasonable fear–we have a lot of reasons and rational explanations to fear Islam) are acting as if we Americans are running down every street in America terrorizing Muslims. If you accept their claim that they number nine million in America, then the number of alleged hate crimes against them was just .000285 percent in 2015–a very, very minute and incredibly insignificant number.
Plus Muslims constantly organize and cajole their communities to report even the smallest paper cut or dirty look as a hate crime. They’ve reported my writing as a “hate crime” because I speak truth the power in exposing them. That’s not supposed to be considered a hate crime (especially in a society in which we’re supposed to value free speech and sunlight to expose cockroaches). And, as we know, Muslim-reported “hate crimes” are often hate crime hoaxes, like the Muslim woman who recently admitted she lied when she claimed a Donald Trump supporter pulled off her hijab. Lying . . . it’s what Muslims do. Part of their religion (look up taqiyyah and kitman).
* The FBI refuses to identify hate crime perpetrators by religion or by Arab and/or Middle-Eastern ethnicity, allowing Muslims and Arabs to get away with their many anti-Semitic hate crimes.
This is something I’ve decried on this site each time I’ve analyzed the FBI’s annual release of hate crimes stats. The FBI in recent years began identifying the race, gender, and “ethnicity” of hate crimes perpetrators, but not the religion. Why? I believe it’s done this way to shield Muslims–who I believe would constitute a statistically significant number of perpetrators of anti-Jewish and racist anti-Black (and probably also anti-White) hate crimes. Ditto for anti-LGBT crimes. I believe the numbers would show that they perpetrate a much larger percentage of such hate crimes than their percentage of the population. And, therefore, while the FBI even has a separate “Anti-Arab” ethnic hate crime category outside of the religious “anti-Muslim” category, it refuses to have a separate “Arab” and/or “Muslim” category of hate crimes perpetrators. Instead, the FBI only has categories like “White” and “non-Hispanic” and “other ethnic group” in which the agency lumps (and thus shields from scrutiny and legitimate criticism) Arabs and Muslims. It’s not politically correct to tell us the truth about them and how they behave.
* The number and percentage of anti-Protestant hate crimes went up far more than that for Muslims.
But the media doesn’t lament that . . . or even bother to mention it. In 2014, there were 25 incidents, 25 offenses, and 28 victims of anti-Protestant hate crimes. In 2015, there were 37 offenses, 47 victims, and 48 victims of anti-Protestant hate crimes. Yes, I know the numbers are small either way. But I can use the same magic tricks with numbers as the media and Muslim press releases do and tell you this: that’s a 48% increase in anti-Protestant hate crimes form the previous year. Where’s the media whining and indignation over this like there is for Muslims? (In case you were wondering, the numbers of hate crimes against Catholics are almost double the number of such incidents for Protestants, but the numbers went down–year-to-year–from 2014 to 2015.)
* The number and percentage of race-based hate crimes against Whites are growing. The number of hate crimes against Whites is once again more than double the number of hate crimes alleged against Muslims. It was more than double in in 2014, when anti-White hate crimes comprised 593 incidents, 701 offenses, and 734 victims. And it was the case again in 2015, when there were 613 incidents, 734 offenses, and 789 victims in anti-White hate crimes. Anti-White hate crimes have gone up nearly every year since I’ve been keeping track and between 2014 and 2015, they went up 3.4 percent (as measured by incidents).
You might argue that this it’s logical that anti-White hate crimes should outnumber those allegedly against Muslims, since Whites outnumber Muslims by tens of millions in America. Well, yes. But if you read the media coverage of the FBI hate crimes, it is as if Muslims are the only victims. They aren’t. Not even close. And there is never any media coverage of the growing hate against White people, which I think can be attributed in large part to media glorification of Black Lives Matter, as well as Barack Obama’s refusal to condemn the group. There is also a growing celebration by the media of the ever-decreasing population and percentage of Whites in America. This is “acceptable” racism, and it makes racists know that attacks on Whites are okay.
* The number and percentage of anti-LGBT hate crimes is much higher than that against Muslims. In 2014, there were 1,097 anti-LGBT hate crimes, 1,269 such offenses, and 1,338 victims. In 2015, the numbers went up to 1,148 such incidents, 1,314 offenses, and 1,361 victims.
Again, you might argue that there are far fewer Muslims in this country than those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. True, but, again, my point here is that there are groups that are victims of hate crimes in America far more than Muslims are. And yet the media hyper-focuses on–and only on–Muslims as alleged victims.
And, since we know Islam is VERY anti-gay (and anti-LGB and T), it’s safe to say that Muslims play a role in the rise of anti-gay hate crimes on American soil. We know gays are executed with government and mosque sanction all over the Islamic world. We’ve all seen the pics and videos of HAMASniks and ISIS members throwing gays off buildings and otherwise torturing them to death. And gays in Muslim-domated places in America like Dearbornistan have to live in the shadows, lest they face incredible ostracism and discrimination, some of it violent.
* There are hate crimes against heterosexuals and males (for just being male), but you don’t hear about those either. The numbers are very low, but they are steady from year-to-year and slowly rising.
These hate crimes–which are never documented by the media–exist.
Another important point: were the Muslim attacks on San Bernardino (perpetrated by Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik) and other similar incidents of Muslim hate crimes against non-Muslims counted in the FBI hate crimes stats? Answer: NO, they were not. And that skews all the numbers the wrong way away from the truth.
Next year, the FBI won’t include the Pulse night club jihadist attack against gays and non-Muslims in its 2016 stats. Nor will it include Ahmad Khan Rahami’s attacks on a military marathon in New Jersey and the bombs he set off in New York, even though these were clearly Muslim-perpetrated hate crimes against non-Muslims.
Then, there are hate crimes like the ones I’ve reported regularly to the FBI. I’ve repeatedly gotten Muslim death, rape, and torture threats, but the FBI rarely does anything about it (they take it very seriously when the roles are reversed and Muslims are the alleged victims of threats). I highly doubt my reports have been included in the hate crimes stats. In fact, I’d bet on it.
And that’s, again, why you cannot take these numbers the FBI serves up as the truth or the whole picture. It’s just not the case. Not even close. The only thing the numbers really show are that Americans are not a violent or hateful people, despite what Islamo-race merchants from HAMAS CAIR and others have the media shrieking about. The numbers against every single group in the reports are statistically very low and insignificant compared to the fact that we had a population of 318.9 million as of 2014.
The bottom line is this: the FBI hate crimes show several things that the media refuses to tell us. Specifically, Muslims are NOT the victims here in America. In fact, they make up a very small percentage of the victims. The real victims of hate crimes in America are Jews, Christians, Blacks, Whites, and the LGBT folks. And, if the FBI gave us the full picture, we’d probably know what we already do from media reports and police reports: Muslims are often the perpetrators of hate crimes.
Jihad remains free and clear of FBI and media scrutiny through a careful massaging and BS reporting of the numbers.
The ghost of Osama Bin Laden is laughing all the way to the 72 Helen Thomases.
Read my previous analyses of FBI hate crimes statistics and how they relate to Muslim BS here, here, here, and here.
jamescomeylaughingseenoevil
***
I know I haven’t posted a lot on this site lately, but I pledge to do better. My site is expensive to host because of security measures I’ve had to undertake to keep Muslim hackers from taking it down. If you like this exclusive analysis of FBI hate crimes stats–and other stuff like this you won’t read anywhere else–please do not hesitate to support this site and my work by donating through Paypal via the Paypal button on on the upper left-hand side of this site (or there are other ways to donate if you do not like Paypal–please contact me for those).
You might also like:

GOP Warns Democrats: You Used the Nuclear Option to Approves Judges and We Will Too

An interesting story from www.lifenews.com about Senate appointment procedures. This follows this post about Planned Parenthood's current plans. For two very interesting books click HERE.
Please follow me here.

What goes around comes around.
Senate Republicans warned Harry Reid of that very thing when he pushed the plunger down on the dynamite blowing up the judicial nomination process in 2013. Three years ago, the outgoing Senate leader blew up the 225-year-old process and cleared the way for a simple majority to rubber stamp the President’s outrageous nominees.
Instead of requiring 60 votes to end debate on a nomination, liberals lowered the threshold to 51. They call it the “nuclear option,” and rightly so, since it had the potential to explode in the Democrats’ face.
At the time, Senate Republicans like Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) warned the president’s party not to go through with it. By opening this door, Reid was almost guaranteeing that under a GOP president and Senate, the Democrats would suddenly be on the wrong side of the same rules they manipulated.
“Democrats set the standard,” Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) reminded everyone this week. “They really screwed up the rules. Frankly, they did it for pure political purposes. Republicans are not limited now.”
Incoming Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) may be on the verge of learning that lesson the hard way. With at least one Supreme Court vacancy to fill, the GOP is warning Democrats to avoid the temptation to obstruct.
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
“We’re going to confirm the president’s nominee one way or the other. And there’s an easy way, and there’s a hard way,” Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said this week. “They just need to accept that reality.”
Fellow Texas Senator Ted Cruz (R) echoed that message pointing out that the Democrats would never succeed in filibustering Donald Trump’s nominees. Not to mention that blocking the president-elect’s court picks — especially when so many Americans listed SCOTUS as one of their primary concerns — would put the Democrats on the wrong side of voters again.
As Leonard Leo, the Executive Vice President of the Federalist Society (which help Trump craft his Supreme Court list) pointed out, “Mr. Trump has a plane and double-digit victories where Senate Democrats are up for re-election, obstructing his nominees will be a political loser.” And while incoming Minority Leader Schumer has another six years before facing voters again, 25 of his colleagues won’t be so lucky. Playing nice on Trump’s nominees isn’t just the best decision for the country — but for a struggling Democratic Party.
LifeNews Note: Tony Perkins is the president of the Family Research Council.
supremecourt17