Showing posts with label scientist shortage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scientist shortage. Show all posts

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Fax your three Members of Congress and help debunk faulty paper about STEM

 An interesting article from www.NumbersUSA.com about the STEM unemployment crisis. This follows this post about American workers.This follows this post about the TPP. This follows this post about drought and immigration. This follows this post on HOW amnesty is funded in ways other than the DHS. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.






Dear activist,
A new paper published by the government's Bureau of Labor Statistics entitled, "STEM Crisis or STEM Surplus? Yes and yes," would lead many to believe that the tech industry is understaffed and needs more foreign workers.
However, the report ignores several key details and is based on incomplete sources.
One of the paper's authors works for one of the biggest users of H-1B visas, Palantir. In addition, the main source of information for the paper is interviews with 18 tech recruiters who say they struggle to find qualified talent, but the paper fails to mention that recruiters are often bound by a company's hiring restrictions such as age or years of experience making it more difficult to find applicants.
You can read the flawed report here.
Fax Congress
Please send a fax to your three Members of Congress addressing the paper's flaws and help to combat the push by the tech industry to increase H-1B numbers.
If you are indeed a worker in a STEM field, we encourage you to add your own message to the body of the fax or the postscript.
Fax your Members of Congress
or click https://www.numbersusa.com/faxes?ID=16792

Friday, September 19, 2014

The God Particle

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the God Particle. This follows this post about the Three Overturns of the Royal Family. This follows this post about the Feast of Trumpets. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.




The God Particle

Scientists fear space and time could fly apart if too much energy is applied to the Higgs Boson, considered to be the fundamental basis for matter. Could this happen?


Media Download Options [ Download Media: right-click on link ]
filesVideo
MP4 Video
Video
MP4 Video - Low Quality
Audio
MP3 Audio - The God Particle


[Darris McNeely] An article came across my desk this morning that said that it could be possible for space and time to collapse if a particular particle called the Higgs boson had too much energy applied to it. Interesting concept, the idea that the universe would collapse because of time and space just simply disappearing if too much energy took place on something that is called the "God Particle". Everyone's favorite physicist Stephen Hawking wrote a introduction to a new book that's coming out in few weeks that is talking once again about this particular piece of energy or matter that was predicted, and a few years ago was actually found, called the Higgs boson.
Now, this is a very interesting term – don't get scared, it's such a unknown term, the Higgs boson – but what the Higgs boson really is, in essence, is the very fabric of energy that holds together the universe. That's about as simply as I can put it. Scientists believe that at the moment of the Big Bang, when the universe came into existence, energy and mass were created and held together by something that they call this particular Higgs boson or what it has been more popularly called, the God Particle – the very fabric of space, of matter, that they predicted would be there a few years ago. And again, in 2012, because of a huge machine that they built over in Switzerland that applied a great deal of energy to electrons – and a great force field was created – they actually proved that it existed. Now, Professor Hawking is saying that if too much energy were applied to it, that it could get out of control and space and time would collapse.
It's a fascinating subject and topic, as is the study of cosmology, and what scientists do know about our universe and are discovering almost every day with articles like this. You know, one of the things that can put the fear into a headline – and people perhaps don't have a combination of reason and faith as their foundation – is that what if something like this did happen? What if scientists got out of control and just ripped the fabric of the universe apart. Is it possible?
Well, I suppose theoretically, according to their formulas, it could be possibly done as well as so many other drastic scenarios that they predict will eventually happen as the universe expands to a point where something else more drastic will happen, but that's where, quite frankly, the matter of faith comes in, and those who do believe that there is a Creator God behind this universe can take great comfort and encouragement, as well as design and understanding, in what God does say about His role in the creation of the universe and also keeping it together because that's really what this is all about here – the idea of, can man by his own efforts destroy the universe? Don't worry; we can't.
In Hebrews:1:3, it makes a statement about God: "who being the brightness of His glory and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by the word of His power, when He had by Himself purged our sins, sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high" – speaking of Jesus Christ, "who upholds all things by His power." Something that science hasn't yet discovered is that power by which God does uphold all things. We don't need to worry that some unknown force or energy – something that science calls the God Particle, or Higgs boson – if put into an unstable state, would destroy the universe. We don't need to worry about that. God is in control, just as He was when it was all created. That's encouraging and that's comforting.
That's BT Daily . Join us next time.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Can You Be a Scientist and a Christian?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/  about Christians and science. This follows this post about Ukraine. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632. You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!


Can You Be a Scientist and a Christian?





How can we resolve the tension between reason and faith?


Media Download Options [ Download Media: right-click on link ]
filesVideo
MP4 Video
Video
MP4 Video - Low Quality
Audio
MP3 Audio - Can You Be a Scientist and a Christian?


[Darris McNeely] I was intrigued by a recent headline, "Can I Be a Scientist and a Christian?" It's a good question. It's a question endlessly debated today among people who believe strictly in science as a means of explaining our world and our universe, as opposed to those who believe in the Bible and take the Bible as the word of God and as a guide for life. Can we marry the two, or must the two remain forever separate?
You know, there are basically three different categories into which people fall as they try to explain the creation, or the existence of this world, life, the universe, and to reconcile faith and reason together, science and the Bible.
First off is what we might call atheistic evolution – the idea that evolution is the sole means to explain the origin of life on earth, there is not a God, there is no Creator, He is not involved in the process. According to a recent poll, about 15 percent of Americans polled adopt and accept this approach.
A second is what is called scientific creation – the idea that the Bible is literal and that there is a God who created this world, and science is not exactly as evolutionists would say that it is. About 46 percent of people adopt this approach. Many who call themselves Christian, fundamentalist or otherwise, and believe in the Bible as an account to explain the creation.
And then there's another third category in a general sense, called a theistic evolutionist, tends to blend the two – that the world, the universe was created by a God but evolution is used as part of the process by which the life forms arose on this earth, especially, and within the universe in terms of its creation, but with a hands-off approach from a Creator who designed into the processes the ideas and the things that we might term as the evolutionary process.
When you look at this, in one sense, these are three general classifications, but on Beyond Today , we have done a number of programs


Wednesday, May 14, 2014

A Response to Bill Nye's Critical Question: What truly is "the most serious problem facing human kind"?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Bill Nye. This follows this post about the Fatima visions. For a free magazine subscription or to get the book recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632. You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!




A Response to Bill Nye's Critical Question: What truly is "the most serious problem facing human kind"?



Printer-friendly version



Source: By Ed Schipul (originally posted to Flickr as Bill Nye) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0 )], via Wiki
I like Bill Nye. I actually like Bill Nye quite a lot.
A former Boeing engineer, Nye possesses the unique capacity to ignite a passion for discovery, particularly for young people. Leveraging his flair for disarming humor, his television programs on science and discovery are legendary. “Bill Nye the Science Guy” is a universally recognized brand.
Nye recently appeared in a quasi-debate on CNN’s “Crossfire” television program, a multi-person show that typically appears to be more of a verbal food fight with guests and hosts talking over each other on controversial issues. Following his appearance, many opined that Nye should now be known as “Bill Nye the Climate Guy,” as he emotionally defended a recent report on climate change. The ratings for this program were high.
Following the debate, he made a most interesting statement: “I will look anyone in the eyes and remind them that climate change is the most serious problem facing human kind…What will future generations think of us?”
Is climate change truly "the most serious problem facing human kind"? That's a fair and important question arising out of Nye's statement. Nye's follow-on question, “what will future generations think of us?” is equally valid.
To answer these questions, perhaps we can first pose another more probing question: what happens when one treats the symptoms of a problem and not its cause?
Engineering training includes a strategic emphasis on root cause analysis. If a product or application fails, it’s not enough to just fix it. Engineers want to know why it failed. By finding out what failed or caused the failure, a design flaw or issue can be remedied for future production and use.
Concerning Nye’s statement, let’s consider the root cause of possible climate change. In reality, greenhouse gases and toxic energy byproducts simply represent the symptoms of a much greater problem. The surprising root cause of Nye’s climate issue actually lies in ancient history, which cause has been amplified many times through the ages.
To frame things in perspective, consider this critical fact: students of the Bible know that scriptural teachings generally divide how we live life into two broad categories. The first is the way of life that God directs and espouses, which focuses on giving, sharing and collaborating. When this way of life is practiced, peace, balance and freedom result. The other way of life is one that tries to justify unfairly taking, hurting, promoting an unbalanced focus on self and harmful greed. It is commonly practiced today, and its outcomes (called “fruits” in various biblical analogies) are all-too evident.
It is this latter category of cognitive self-indulgence that allows emotional space to somehow tolerate children being gassed to death in Syria. It helps people justify why it is globally permissible for roughly five percent of the world’s population to greedily consume over 50 percent of the world’s finished goods (while depending on people living in poverty to sustain it). Its relabeling of greed as somehow justifiable allows people to rationalize living with hot national debt at incomprehensible levels in order to prop up an unsustainable lifestyle. Instead having a balanced approach to nurturing and caring for the land and environment that sustains life, this harmful approach to living explains away insolent atmospheric belching of harmful chemicals for industrial and energy production. It accounts for why nations distrust, even fear each other, and why they spend upwards of an inconceivable two trillion dollars annually on military expenditures. I could go on, but the picture is sufficiently clear.
Simply put, it is  give  versus  get .
And “get” wins hands down almost every time.
How did we arrive at this destructive point? Its etymology squarely lies in the answer to what is the most serious problem facing human kind. Future generations will talk long about the world’s present inability to properly address this issue.
What is it? What is the true root cause? Here it is: The most serious problem today is the foolish rejection of God by billions of people. Rejection of God means to willfully cut oneself off from critical guidance, from what the Bible describes as God’s “incomparably great power for us who believe” (Ephesians:1:19, New International Version).
Make no mistake. God is all-powerful. God is not trying to somehow convince us that He is right. At a future point where this way of “get” will lead humanity to the precipice of total annihilation, when the way of “get” crescendos to unfathomable evil, God  will  intervene (Matthew:24:22).
Until that time, God will continue to allow humanity to demonstrate to itself its incapacity to act and govern apart from God (James:4:1-3, Isaiah:59:8). He will permit the deadly consequences of human folly to nearly reach their full measure. We need to understand that the potential destructive outcomes of climate change represent some of these consequences.
Here’s the crux of the matter: It doesn’t have to be this way! The answer? David instructed Solomon: “Acknowledge the God of your father, and serve him with wholehearted devotion and with a willing mind, for the Lord searches every heart and understands every motive behind the thoughts. If you seek him, he will be found by you;  but if you forsake him, he will reject you ”(1 Chronicles:28:9, New International Version, emphasis added).
As the world will learn, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God” (Hebrews:10:31). The consequences of humanity’s present preferred way of life are relentless.
With all due respect to Bill Nye, here’s a new statement to consider: Our variant? “I will look anyone in the eyes and warn them that rejecting God and embracing ‘opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge’ [1 Timothy:6:20, NIV] is the most serious problem facing human kind. Climate change is simply the consequences of humanity rejecting the benevolent law of God, which if truly applied, would result in the outbreak of peace and sanity. To survive, we must identify and treat the cause of our problems, not just the symptoms.”
God’s way is a way of love, of helping, of prospering. You don’t have to be a victim of humanity’s most serious problem. You have a choice .
From across the ages, the cry to choose wisely is clear: “Save yourselves from this corrupt generation” (Acts:2:22). What will you do?


Blog posts do not undergo review by the doctrinal review team of the United Church of God. This post represents the personal opinion of the author and should not be considered the official stance of the United Church of God. If you have any questions or concerns please direct them to webmaster@ucg.org.

Thursday, January 9, 2014

The unemployment bill includes a major foreign-worker increase -- Tell your Senators to say NO!

A very interesting post from www.numbersusa.com about the worker increase in the unemployment bill. This follows this post about Diane Black attempting to defund the illegal alien advocate position. This follows this post about Chris Christie giving in-state tuition to illegal immigrants in New Jersey. REMEMBER, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.




Dear NumbersUSA activists,
Happy New Year! Only 2 days into this second session of the 113th Congress, we need to ask for your quick attention to help block a major foreign-worker increase amendment in the Senate.
Please go to https://www.numbersusa.com/faxes?ID=15659 and send a fax to your two Senators asking them to OPPOSE Sen. Jerry Moran's Amendment (S. Amdt 2612) to S. 1845, the Emergency Unemployment Compensation Extension Act (DETAILS BELOW).
While NumbersUSA takes no position on the overall legislation or the extension of unemployment benefits, we do oppose major increases in foreign workers, particularly at a time when more than 20 million citizens and legal immigrants are struggling to find full-time work. One can't help but note the irony in Sen. Moran's attempt to permanently increase the number of foreign workers via legislation intended to help unemployed U.S. workers.
Your quick response is particularly needed as this amendment is the first immigration-related piece of legislation in play this year and defeating it will send an important message that Americans oppose increases in immigration, whether or not they are comprehensive increases or piecemeal increases. The fate of the Moran Amendment is surely being monitored by the well-funded advocates of higher immigration such as Mark Zuckerberg's FWD.us and others who have just this week essentially said they are no longer pushing for a comprehensive immigration bill and instead focusing on pushing any and every piecemeal increase they can. While this particular action is in the Senate, you can be sure that the House Leadership is watching closely as they are preparing to set their legislative priorities for the year.

Send a Fax
Yesterday the Senate voted to proceed to the debate over the extension of unemployment benefits (S. 1845). Today, Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) has introduced an amendment to the unemployment extension bill. His amendment would add language that would grant an additional 125,000 permanent foreign workers visas each year.
 Fax your Senator
or click https://www.numbersusa.com/faxes?ID=15659
These permanent visas would be allocated as such: 50,000 to foreign graduates in STEM fields and 75,000 to "immigrant entrepreneurs." While there is some support for increasing the share of qualified STEM-type visas, there is nothing temporary or qualified about the Moran Amendment and it contains no worker protections.


THANK YOU for all you have done and continue to do in the name of sensible immigration policies.
Anne
manetas

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Pro-Amnesty Conservatives to Lobby Congress This Month

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com about “conservative” pro-amnesty groups. This follows this post about Columbus Day being opposed by pro-amnesty groups. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.

Pro-Amnesty Conservatives to Lobby Congress This Month


posted on NumbersUSA


Later this month a group of conservatives who support efforts to give work permits, legal status, or citizenship to illegal aliens will be holding a "fly-in" to meet with Republican Congressmen in an effort to get them to support legislation that amnesties illegal aliens. The group, numbering more than 300, includes pastors, farmers, police chiefs, and business owners among its number.



One of those visiting the House of Representatives on Oct. 28 will be Jeremy Hudson, a pastor from House Speaker John Boehner's district: "I'm not an advocate of open borders. I'm not an advocate of blanket amnesty. I just see (undocumented immigrants) who are hurting and want to contribute to their family ... and the system is not working for them."



Another participant is 70 year-old Idaho rancher Terry Jones, who got tired of looking for legal workers: "I was getting too old to fuss with finding the labor. We're not here wanting to break the laws. Heavens to Betsy, we've got stewardship of the land and our animals, employees we want to treat right and pay a fair wage to. But the government is just interested in ... who's going to get the credit, who's going to get the votes."



The fly-in is funded by organizations, many who hold non-conservative ideals, who want Congress to pass comprehensive amnesty. Among these groups are New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's Parternship for a New American Economy, FWD.US, which is funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other Silicon Valley tech titans, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.



https://www.numbersusa.com/sendfax?refer=content%2Fmy%2Faction%2Fboard

Thursday, August 15, 2013

There Is No Tech Worker Shortage!

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com about STEM workers in the U.S. This follows this post about who to contact about opposing Amnesty. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.







High-tech companies often cite a tech-worker shortage when asking Congress to raise the 65,000 annual cap on H-1B visas, but according to a study conducted by John Miano and the Center for Immigration Studies there is no empirical data to support that claim. Walt Gardner wrote in the Atlanta Journal Constitution that the United States produces an ample amount of tech workers. In fact, Gardner found that in some years, the number of foreign programmers and engineers imported outnumbered the number of jobs created by the industry.



Other Key facts pertaining to the perceived shortage of tech workers in the United States:



•The number of H-1B visas for engineers has exceeded engineering job creation every year since 2001. (Center for Immigration Studies "H-1B Visa Numbers: No Relationship to Economic Need" June 2008)

•American colleges and universities produce more than enough science, math, and engineering graduates to fill available jobs:

◦"The United States’ education system produces a supply of qualified [science and engineering] graduates in much greater numbers than jobs available." - Harold Salzman, Ph.D. , The Urban Institute

◦"First, no one who has come to the question with an open mind has been able to find any objective data suggesting general 'shortages' of scientists and engineers." - Michael S. Teitelbaum, Vice President, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

◦"Recent policy reports claim the United States is falling behind other nations in science and math education and graduating insufficient numbers of scientists and engineers. Review of the evidence and analysis of actual graduation rates and workforce needs does not find support for these claims." - Urban Institute study Into the Eye of the Storm

◦Before the economic downturn, the Department of Labor predicted an average of 82,000 new STEM jobs every year.

◦Between 2006 and 2007, the U.S. Department of Education and the Computing Research Association show that colleges and universities graduated more than 203,000 students in STEM disciplines.

◦Yet in FY 2006 more than 1 30,000 H-1 B applications for computer-related occupations were reviewed and certified. In FY 2007 and FY 2008 this trend continued with over 1 39,000 and 1 37,000 H-1 B visas, respectively, approved in computer-related occupations.

•Real Wages in science, engineering, computer, and mathematics (STEM) fields have remained flat since 2000. (Gene Nelson)

◦A typical postdoctoral research or teaching position in a STEM field (requiring 12 years of education after high school) offers pay and benefits comparable to what a high school graduate earns managing a fast-food restaurant. (Gene Nelson)

◦Wages of new H-1B computer workers dropped 16 percent between 2002 and 2005. (Ron Hira, Rochester Institute of Technology, Economic Policy Institute)

•20 percent of high-skilled immigrants in the U.S. Labor force is unemployed or working in an unskilled job. (Migration Policy Institute, "Uneven Progress: The Employment Pathways of Skilled Immigrants in the United States" Oct. 2008)

•Studies finding no shortage of engineers in the U.S. include one by Duke University's Vivek Wadhwa and another by Hal Salzman of the Urban Institute and Lindsay Lowell of Georgetown University.

◦The Duke team found that the often-cited (by Sen. Kennedy, Newt Gingrich and others) statistics that the U.S. produces 70,000 engineers annually versus 350,000 from India and 600,000 from China are not valid.

◦They found that the U.S. is far ahead by almost any measure.


Friday, August 3, 2012

Microsoft's immigration roundtable raises questions

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com about the problems of American STEM workers. This follows this post about crimes committed by illegals released due to Barack Obama's executive order. This follows this post about the Senate race in Texas.   This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read this very interesting book HERE.

Microsoft's immigration roundtable raises questions






By Jeremy Beck - posted on NumbersUSA



Washington Post editor Emi Kolawole walked away from a one-sided immigration roundtable with some questions which she shared with her readers in "Microsoft hosts skilled immigration roundtable." Here they are, along with some possible answers that I have provided:



(1) Why aren’t American students interested in science, technology, math and engineering?



American students are interested in these fields. Our educational system produces more science, technology, math, and engineering (STEM) graduates every year than there are available jobs. Kolawole's collegaue at the Post, Brian Vastag, wrote about this a few weeks ago in "U.S. pushes for more scientists, but the jobs aren't there."



Beryl Lief Benderly of the Columbia Journalism Review has criticized the media's failure to challenge shortage myths. In "What Scientist Shortage? The Johnny-can’t-do-science myth damages US research," Benderly wrote: "American college students have for decades shown strong and consistent interest in STEM; year after year, just under a third of all college students in this country earn degrees in those subjects. But, ironically, dismal career prospects drive many of the best of those students to more promising professions, such as medicine, law, or finance."



(2) And when they are, why do they pursue employment in non STEM fields — a phenomenon known as “diversion.” What role does ballooning student loan debt play?



Graduates have woken up to the fact that, given the current influx of non-immigrant workers taking American jobs, a career in a STEM field would be short-lived. With a constant supply of available overseas labor in addition to the glut of U.S. graduates, employers can easily replace their older, more expensive workers with younger cheaper ones. Facing an uncertain career path that could be over by age 35, STEM grads are naturally tempted by more stable professions. Forbes magazine wrote last year that, "Between 2003 and 2006 the percentage of graduates from MIT going into financial services rose...to almost 25%...Financial firms offer considerably higher pay, better career prospects and insulation against off-shoring..." ("Is The Financial Sector Gobbling Up The U.S.' Would-Be Entrepreneurs?," 4/13/11). And, yes, the H-1B program accelerates offshoring. Just ask Diane Drozdowski who trained two people to replace her and take her job back with them overseas.



Few people would willingly stay in a field that makes them obsolete before they can repay their student loans.



(3) And, of course, what of the perception among those in the general public that a job given to an H-1B visa recipient from overseas would take a job away from an otherwise qualified American or depress wages?



According to the Department of Labor's 2006 Strategic Plan, "H-1Bworkers may be hired even when a qualified U.S. worker wants the job, and a U.S. worker can be displaced from the job in favor of the foreign worker." The H-1B program wasn't sold as a way to replace U.S. workers - but it was written that way. Just ask Mary discovered employers have no responsibility under the law to give her a shot at a U.S. job over a foreign workers; or this immigration lawyer from Visa Pro who reassures employers that they do not have to prove that they have attempted to hire U.S. workers before applying for foreign workers. As the Cohen and Grigsby law firm was notoriously caught saying: "Our goal is clearly not to find a qualified and interested U.S. worker."



Unlike legal permanent workers or U.S. citizens, H-1B workers cannot demand market wages because their employers hold their visas. The law allows employers to pay their H-1B workers the "prevailing wage," which ends up being $18,000 a year less than the median wage for U.S. workers, according to the Center for Immigration Studies. In 2011, Greater Missouri Medical Pro-Care Providers, Inc. told a judge that they earned a profit of $1,000 per month for every H-1b workerthey hired.



The H-1B program results in fewer jobs for U.S. workers. In 1998, Dan Sullivan, Qualcomm's Senior Vice President of HR, testified before Congress that "rather than taking jobs from American labor pools, [foreign workers] are creating more jobs for U.S. workers through the application of their specialized skills." At the time, U.S.-born workers made up 94.5 percent of Qualcomm's workforce. Twenty years after Sullivan's testimony, the percentage of American-born workers at Qualcomm dropped to approximately 40 percent.



Although Kolawole didn't find the answers to her questions at Microsoft's roundtable, the answers are out there for people who want to find them.



JEREMY BECK is the Director of the Media Standards Project for NumbersUSA



NumbersUSA's blogs are copyrighted and may be republished or reposted only if they are copied in their entirety, including this paragraph, and provide proper credit to NumbersUSA. NumbersUSA bears no responsibility for where our blogs may be republished or reposted.



Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Foreign Worker Timeout Report Says U.S. has Too Many Scientists but Not Enough Jobs

A very interesting post from http://www.numbersusa.com/ about the large amount of domestic unemployed STEM workers who do not need more workers brought in to compete against them. This follows this post about Freshmen Congressmen who have not yet kept their immigration enforcement promises. This follows this post about Barack Obama's Amnesty Edict. This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read this very interesting book HERE!

Report Says U.S. has Too Many Scientists but Not Enough Jobs


Monday, July 9, 2012 - posted on NumbersUSA





A recent report from the Washington Post finds that there are too many scientists living in the United States with too few jobs despite bipartisan support for increased immigration for foreign nationals with advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The report finds that some high-tech areas are booming, while jobs in many other fields, including biology, chemistry, and medicine, are scarce.



The Washington Post report notes that while many highly-trained individuals are employed, many are not working in their field. This is consistent with research from the Center for Immigration Studies, which has found that 1.8 million engineers are either unemployed or working in a field other than engineering.



"They’ll be employed in something," Michael S. Teitelbaum, a senior adviser to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation who studies the scientific workforce told the Washington Post. "But they go and do other things because they can’t find the position they spent their 20s preparing for."



The Post also found that U.S. drug firms, which used to produce high-paying, stable research positions, have cut 300,000 jobs since 2000.



"It's been a bloodbath, it’s been awful," Kim Haas, who spent 20 years designing pharmaceuticals for drug giants Wyeth and Sanofi-Aventis and is in her early 50s, told the Post. "Scads and scads and scads of people [have been cut]. Very good chemists with PhDs from Stanford can’t find jobs."



According to the American Chemical Society, the unemployment rate among chemists is at a 40-year high at 4.6% and only 38% of new PhD chemists were employed in 2011.



For more information, see the Washington Post and the Center for Immigration Studies. Also, see our TV ad that's running across the country asking Congress why they want to bring in more high-tech workers when 1.8 million engineers can't find work in engineering.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

The Biblical Authors: Men of God and Science

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the Bible as a SCIENCE book. This follows this post about America's debt problems. For a free magazine subscription or to get this book for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886-8632.


The Biblical Authors: Men of God and Science


Solomon, king of Israel, was a man of remarkable learning. The Bible describes him as having great interest and understanding in scientific disciplines. Solomon understood the movement of the prevailing winds about the earth and the hydrological cycle that brings rain (Ecclesiastes 1:6-7). He was a horticulturist, creating a great assortment of vineyards, gardens and orchards (Ecclesiastes 2:4-5).



He was something of a botanist and zoologist, understanding plants, animals, birds, insects and fish (1 Kings 4:33). He was a student of psychology, sociology and human relations, as demonstrated by the subject matter of the book of Proverbs.



But Solomon eventually realized that all his scientific, material knowledge did not bring him satisfaction. His life grew hollow and unsatisfying. His concentration on scientific knowledge, without proper emphasis on God's spiritual knowledge and understanding, rendered life meaningless (Ecclesiastes 1:16-18). He concluded, after much retrospection, that a man must put the knowledge of God first: "This is the end of the matter: you have heard it all. Fear God and obey his commandments; this sums up the duty of mankind" (Ecclesiastes 12:13, Revised English Bible).



Moses is another example of a man trained in the physical sciences but blessed with spiritual understanding. Moses was educated "in all the wisdom of the Egyptians" (Acts 7:22). With the guidance of God he could separate the good from the bad, and undoubtedly his early education was of great help in his life of fulfilling God's calling to lead his fellow Israelites out of Egyptian slavery and to govern a nation.



Other men of God were educated in the intellectual pursuits of their day. The prophet Daniel was a brilliant student brought up in the royal academy of the Babylonians (Daniel 1:4). The Babylonian Empire of Daniel's day dominated the world and was scientifically advanced, particularly in astronomy.



Daniel apparently saw no conflict between the scientific truths the Babylonians had discovered and the knowledge of God that he had held from his youth. Indeed, he thrived, serving rulers of the Babylonian and Medo-Persian empires as a high-ranking government official. Daniel's education did not undermine his faith in God. He knew God's Word to be true and inviolable and saw no conflict between scientific knowledge and Scripture.



We must study the Scriptures to gain eternal life (John 5:39). But, as time and inclination allow, we should study the physical sciences as well. In so doing we will gain a deeper appreciation of the world our Creator has made and increase our faith and understanding of Him.



The apostle Paul understood that man stands to learn a great deal about His Creator by observing His creation: "Ever since the creation of the world, his invisible nature—his eternal power and divine character—have been clearly perceptible through what he has made. So they have no excuse" (Goodspeed's American Translation). The Wall Street Journal put it this way: "If a little science takes one away from God, a great deal of science brings one back to him" (Oct. 10, 1994).

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Obama defense doctrine means pre-emptive disarmament

An interesting article from http://www.hughhewitt.com/ which talks Barack's nulcear strategy. Note how this is expected to create a shortage of American scientists as Obamacare creates a shortage of doctors. This follows this post Iran's own missle development and this article about the recent news about offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence that follows this previous post about it.. This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more posts like this click here.


Hugh Hewitt: Obama defense doctrine means pre-emptive disarmament
By: Hugh Hewitt Examiner Columnist

President Obama unveiled a radical shift in American military doctrine last week that ought to be known as "the Obama Doctrine: the embrace of unilateral, pre-emptive disarmament."
The new policy was announced in a handful of sentences in the just released "Nuclear Posture Review Report" ("NPR").
The two passages that are genuinely radical and that mark a significant break with all of post-World War II history have not received much attention and deserve underlining and sustained debate, especially in Congress.
The first comes at Page xiv:
"The United States will not develop new nuclear warheads. Life Extension Programs (LEPs) will use only nuclear components based on previously tested designs, and will not support new military missions or provide for new military capabilities." (Emphasis added)
The same position is restated in slightly different form at Page 40 of the NPR, with the unqualified statement that the United States"will not develop new nuclear warheads, and it will be structured so as not to require nuclear testing."
Thus Obama commits his administration to a policy of not producing a new nuclear weapon, no matter how strategic its effect or significant its deterrent value, and no matter what our enemies are doing.
Nuclear weapons will never again, under the Obama doctrine, be used for a new military mission no matter how effective that mission might become via the integration of nuclear weapons or -- and this should be stressed -- even if the deployment of the new weapon or mission might lead to less loss of life rather than more; fewer American casualties rather than more; a quicker end to war rather than a prolonged and devastating campaign.
This isn't a military strategy -- it is a military theology, one founded on the central belief that evolutions in nuclear weapons are always and everywhere evil. If FDR or Truman had embraced the Obama Doctrine, there would have been no Manhattan Project and no end to the war in Japan except for the invasion of the home islands.
If Reagan had begun his tenure in the White House in 1981 with such a pledge, the collapse of the Soviet Union under the stress of attempting to keep up with American innovation in both defensive strategy ("Star Wars") and new generations of ballistic missiles might not have occurred.
The idea of Obama binding America to static technology even as our enemies innovate and expand the capabilities of their nuclear arsenals has not yet sunk in.
No similar pledge would ever be considered vis-a-vis any other military technology, but the president's hard-left understanding of the role of nuclear weapons -- strike that, American nuclear weapons -- is sufficient to power this stunning departure from past practice of all presidents of both parties forward.
The shut-down of all R&D into new generations of nuclear weapons will have deleterious effects beyond Obama's time in office, even if a replacement arrives in 2013 and announces the doctrine's immediate repeal.
This is the sort of knockdown punch that drives scientists and engineers into other fields as they see their area of expertise unilaterally declared by the commander in chief to be not merely useless but somehow destructive of the security of America.
There are reports that Secretary of Defense Robert Gates opposed this part of the NPR. When Gates next appears before Senate and House committees, we have to hope he is questioned closely on the internal debate leading up to the adoption of this policy of pre-emptive disarmament.
There is no precedent for so radical a change in policy with so little public discussion or congressional input since the world entered the nuclear age, and Congress must assert its central role in the design of American defense policy.
Washington Examiner Columnist Hugh Hewitt is a law professor at Chapman University Law School and a nationally syndicated radio talk show host who blogs daily at HughHewitt.com

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Obama-defense-doctrine-means-pre-emptive-disarmament-90572049.html#ixzz0l5z3zN75