An interesting article from www.vdare.com about Columbus Day. This follows this post about the candidates for U.S. House Speaker.  Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.

Hello, Columbus! The Day When Hate Speech Is Okay

---

James Fulford
       

A+ | a-

TO THE MEMORY OF CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS WHOSE HIGH FAITH AND INDOMITABLE COURAGE GAVE TO MANKIND A NEW WORLD
BORN MCDXXXVI DIED MDIV
(1436—1504)

That`s the inscription on the monument to Christopher Columbus in front of Union Station in DC. The monument, a really great sculpture group by Lorado Taft, was dedicated in 1912, by people who thought that discovering America,, in the face of great odds and great dangers, was a Good Thing.
Now, of course, people are discovering that Columbus was white, and so it’s okay to hate him. At the top of the page I have a picture of the sculpture group as it was defaced in 2002 by a “Native American” activist. [Credit, Sam Durant.net]
Of course, it’s only okay to hate Americans on October 12. For Mexicans it’s called Dia De La Raza, and Arizona teacher Walter Kehowski, who mailed VDARE.com articles to his fellow teachers in October, 2003 found that it was literally a Federal case (of national origin discrimination.) See my story Angst in Arizona—Caused By VDARE.com? and a note published six years later, in which Alex Kosinski, the good Judge on the Ninth Circuit, finally decided the case was none of the Court’s business.
Searching today’s news for “Columbus Day”, what we find is mostly hatred:

• For some, Columbus Day is not a holiday to celebrate, By Pam Cottrel, Springfield News-Sun, October 11, 2015
• On Columbus Day, the Explorer Isn’t Always Welcome, U.S. News & World Report, Oct 9, 2015
• Columbus Day: Some Love It, Others Not So Much, Voice of America , October 11, 2015

You don’t see that kind of thing on Martin Luther King Day (except here.) Here’s a Video For Columbus Day from the old days that gets a lot of hate comments.

Here are five stories by the late Comanche writer, patriot, and friend of VDARE.com, David Yeagley:

• A Comanche Looks At Columbus
• An American Indian View of Immigration
• Columbus Day In Denver, Again
• Columbus Day—A Comanche`s Philosophy
• Columbus Is Back in Denver!
• Thought For Columbus Day: Was Columbus An Indian? Are Asians Indians?

And here are some more stories by American non-Indians, or “white people” as they’re known.

• Goodbye, Columbus–Hello, “Indigenous People’s Day” by Pat Buchanan
• Now at University of New Mexico: “Indigenous Peoples’ Resistance and Resilience Day” by James Kirkpatrick
• On Columbus Day, A Reminder That Germs Went Both Ways In 1492 by A. W. Morgan
• Teddy Roosevelt`s Original Hyphenation—a speech delivered TR on Columbus Day, 1915.
• Abolishing America (contd.): Thoughts On the Guilt Lobby On The Anniversary Of Columbus` Discovery, by Neil Smith
• The Rise and Fall of Columbus Day by Steve Sailer
• Goodbye Columbus, And Goodbye America? Not So Fast! By me.

And here’s something from Chauncey Depew from the “Columbian Oration, ” at the Columbian Exposition in 1892, an event in which America celebrated the 400^th anniversary of the landing:

This day belongs not to America, but to the world. The results of the event it commemorates are the heritage of the peoples of every race and clime. We celebrate the emancipation of man. The preparation was the work of almost countless centuries; the realization was the revelation of one.
The Cross on Calvary was hope; the cross raised on San Salvador was opportunity. But for the first, Columbus would never have sailed; but for the second, there would have been no place for the planting, the nurture, and the expansion of civil and religious liberty. … All hail, Columbus, discoverer, dreamer, hero, and apostle. We here, of every race and country, recognize the horizon which bounded his vision and the infinite scope of his genius. The voice of gratitude and praise for all the blessings which have been showered upon mankind by his adventure is limited to no language, but is uttered in every tongue.
Neither marble nor brass can fitly form his statue. Continents are his monument, and unnumbered millions, present and to come, who enjoy in their liberties and happiness the fruits of his faith, will reverently guard and preserve, from century to century, his name and fame.

400 years after Columbus, that’s how normal Americans felt about Columbus Day.
That’s how we still feel here at VDARE.com.

<< Previous post

2014, New Year, Old Error

A timely post about from www.badeagle.com analyzing the current state of America. This follows this post  about the corruption in the Department of Homeland Security.This follows this post about Christmas in Mexico.  In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

2014, New Year, Old Error

by David Yeagley   3 Comments ·     

 

It is difficult for a realist to have a positive outlook for 2014, when obviously self-righteous fools are intentionally ruining the country, and having a wondrous delight in so doing. They crave a legacy of changing America, from the land of the free and home of the brave, to the land of the weak and ignorant dependents.
There is no solution. Politicians and government officials are bribed, and wholly undependable except for fraud, dissembling, and concession to naturally evolving tyranny.
The conglomerate of conservative talkers, the professional commentators, have had little or no effect whatever. Tea Party candidates have betrayed their trust as well. Republicans fear being blamed, as though they truly guilty. They are lost in rhetorical politics and reactionary manoeuvers.
Perhaps these are just the jaded views of one deep into chemotherapy treatment, passed six months now, since it all began. Perhaps I simply don’t have the energy to think so positively in the face of obvious demise–of the country, that is. I do believe America is over. What we were will never be again. The Democrat Communists and traitors, weak Republicans have seen to that.
And even though I always admired George W. Bush and his compassionate wife and strong daughters, I realize now that he was a rather horrible president. In fact, Bush opened all the doors through which “Barack Obama,” the resident president, has danced through in such arrogant ease: over-spending, reduced freedom, and international cooperation, or submission.

Former President George W. Bush, globalist.
How so? Fundamental globalism. The entire Bush clan is a purely globalist entity. This is the Communist path, really. And, as George Soros as said, America is the biggest obstacle to world peace. Same concept. If you excel, you disrupt equality. If you are great, you oppress those who aren’t. The idea that all are equal is mark of self-righteous political theorists, the most dangerous and tyrannical of their kind. George Soros understands all that. And certainly Hillary Clinton.
Are there any powers that would contest or challenge globalism successfully? No. Big business needs it. It’s all about cheap labor. The churches all revel in international mission programs. The market attracts globalism. Entertainment industries, ‘hospitality’ businesses all thrive on tourism, which is another aspect of internationalism.

George Soros, financial manipulator.
I just don’t see improvement. Indeed, my personal health disallows any too much enthusiasm. My lung capacity is no doubt forever reduced. Just breathing is a conscious challenge. Mesothelioma is a fast developing cancer, and only about 40% of patients survive one year; only 20% by the second year, and by the fourth year, less than 10% survive. I personally don’t think about these figures, as I have plenty else to think about. (Plus, I believe in miracles of healing, and a merciful God.)
I am genuinely sorry that America has passed. The great vision is now just some psychological “Indian reservation” in the collective consciousness of the populace. It will soon be relegated to the collective unconscious, no doubt. It is a tragedy, even if an inevitability. White conservatives are just out-numbered and out-gunned, just as the American Indians were.

Hillary Clinton, lying enemy of the state.
As an American Indian, I decry the demise most of all, more than even they who built the country. They took the land from Indians–who fought to the death to keep it. Now white liberals are giving it way to the most unworthy, and Indians don’t even have a chance to fight for it. This is one of the greatest ironies of all history.
So, let 2014 be a year of passing, of quick passing. If there is no 2nd Revolution, then we shall all need to quickly submit to the tyrannies ahead, and make as little fuss about it as possible, lest we be bigger fools than the they which brought on the demise. All our loud talk about guns and freedom is just noble-sounding noise. The tyrannists have won already. They knew how to take advantage of the weak, ignorant, and greedy.

David Yeagley, great, great grandson of Bad Eagle.

- See more at: http://www.badeagle.com/2014/01/02/2014-new-year-old-error/#sthash.SjZvlHXV.dpuf

Arabs Reject Their Own Image

A very interesting post from www.badeagle.com about an Arab sports mascot. This follows this post about the U.S. and its allies Israel and Saudi Arabia.  This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more about what you can do to get more involved click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.

Arabs Reject Their Own Image

by David Yeagley

Arabs have joined the protest business, with a touch of the American Indian mascot issue. The Arab-American Discrimination Committee has protested California’s Coachella Valley High School mascot of the tradition Arab image. That would be the image of the belly dancer, the magic carpet, the saber wielding cutthroat, etc. This image, of course, was chosen by the school (80 years ago) rather than the modern image of the lying, murderous Muslim, the cruel, self-idolizing Islamic Arab so detrimental to all free nations, so intend on humiliating, denigrating, even enslaving all other people and all other religion.

Coachella Valley High School mascot, the Arab.
But “ethnic stereo typing” was the accusation levied by the ADC in their November 1, 2013 letter to Dr. Darryl S. Adams, Superintendent of the Coachella Valley Unified School District. Why, they even protest the beautiful kaffiya, the headdress worn by virtually every Arab in Saudi Arabia today.
They just don’t want the Arab to be a mascot, much as liberal Indians object to Indians being used as mascots. This is the white liberal racist training, and Arabs have picked up on it entirely, always looking to use American political jargon to advance their own Islamic colonization in free societies, with the intent to deny all basic freedom.
The Coachella Valley High School was established in 1910, about 135 miles southeast of Los Angeles, and the Arab mascot was espoused in 1930′s (or in the 1920′s) in honor of a once large Arab colony involved in the date palm growing industry there. The name was considered a gift to the Arab peoples for their contribution to the economy of the Coachella Valley, and certainly not meant as a slight or insult. As of today, of course, the school is 98% Mexican-American. Certainly wasn’t so in the 1920′s or
30′s.

“Home of the Arabs,” Coachella Valley High School.
At the racial protest, naturally the media leaped to support the effort to change the mascot. Following every pattern created by the professional American Indian protesters (like A.I.M.–American Indian Movement and their left-overs), and their Communist Manifesto playbook procedures taught them by the same liberals who created the original Black Panthers, the arrogant Arabs are throwing their kaffiya into the ring of racially abused minorities, and media is the primary tool accompanying the side-walk protests and published letters to authorities. It’s all a great custom now.

A fine image of the traditional, romantic Arab.
Huffington puffed about the Arab mascot protest on December 12. Fox news hit it earlier, on November 7, the same time USAToday dramatized it. And a local paper in Florida even got in the act. The Orlando Sentinel ran the story November 7. (The Sentinel, however, was pleased to include photos of several Indian mascots to validate the Arab protest.)
Same ol’ same ol’.
Huffington puffs:

It’s a twist on a decades-old issue that has centered primarily on Native American mascots, logos and nicknames and has transformed Indians to Cardinal at Stanford University and Chieftains to Redhawks at Seattle University.
But the Arab debate spurs the same set of questions: Is it possible to craft a mascot in the image of an ethnic group that doesn’t offend, or are schools better off scrapping the idea altogether?
The debate comes as the more familiar Indian controversy has gained increased heat.

No question about the Indian basis for this. The Arab spiel is obviously superficial, unoriginal, manipulative, and generally hackneyed. But, Arabs have been carefully using (abusing) American political language to sneak in their cruel, tyrannical sharia ever since 1948. As a matter of fact, even the Palestinians have tried to imitate American Indian protests, even dressing in cheap, dime-store Indian costumes to emphasize their imagined affinity with the American Indian plight. This is all wholly denigrating to the American Indian, professional liberal or not.
Actually, the Coachella Valley High School Arabs could be justified on the same “sports” basis that any American Indian mascot could be. It’s about razzing the other team. It is about intimidating the opponent, psychologically. Of course, that wasn’t at all the reason for the Arab mascot in the 1920′s. But, today, it is certainly logical. Arabs love to intimidate, to invade, to take over, to denigrate, humiliate, and to demonstrate superiority, at any level. This is why mosques are built on formerly Jewish or Christian sites. Great sportsmen, these murderous Arab Muslims.

How can this image offend?
Never having a reputation for peace, for mutual respect, the Arab nevertheless has a unique aesthetic, and no doubt a unique appeal to the world. The “stereotype” that the Coachella Valley High School employs is the actually the more positive image, one that accentuates the free-flowing spirit, the sensual beauty, and the appeal of natural enthusiasm and aggression. This is to say nothing of the Arab accomplishments in calligraphy, art, science, exploration, and even philosophy. But, this is all forgotten in modern times. They stand only for fraud, deception, and tyranny.
“Arab-Americans” would do well to reconsider their protest. The California high school is offering a romantic, pleasurable image of the Arab, much like the 1992 Disney Aladdin movie.
To top this off, Katy Perry is now under fire for her singing “Geisha” act. She’s accused of offending the Japanese! Not by the Japanese, of course, but by white liberals looking to create a fuss, and by white liberal journalists looking for a story. Bernie Goldberg talked about this on a Bill O’Reilly segment recently. The PC pros called it “cultural appropriation.” That’s suppose to be bad, imitating another culture other than your own, without permission.

Posted by David Yeagley

- See more at: http://www.badeagle.com/2013/12/03/arabs-reject-their-own-image/#sthash.XtMmVFaK.dpuf

Enough Pelosi? Try Trotta. A Tale of Two Italian Women

BLOGGERS NOTE: I WILL BE MOVING FROM FACEBOOK TO TWITTER AND BLOGSPOT SOON!


A timely post about www.BadEagle.com about Nancy Pelosi. This follows this post about the group MALDEF in Los Angeles.. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.   Enough Pelosi? Try Trotta. A Tale of Two Italian Women

by David Yeagley   Had enough of Nancy Pelosi? Try Liz Trotta. Both are older Italian women, both from the eastern seaboard, and in my humble opinion, both are nice-looking, still. Nancy is 73, and Trotta is 76. Nancy is from Baltimore, Trotta is from New Haven (Connecticut). One a bewildering liberal, the other a down to earth conservative. So, I for one am definitely in this game!


Anyone with rationality understands Nancy Pelosi to be slightly ‘touched.’ When a national leader of her status says Congress “has to pass the [health reform/Obamacare] bill so you can find out what’s in it, away from the fog of controversy,” we know we’re dealing with a deluded mind when it comes to politics. This was the lowest point of congressional leadership in modern times.

Nancy Pelosi (Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro) is so superficial, so untenable, and so wistful in her words, that one is tempted to write it all of as some weird, sublimated sexual energy. Remember her remarks about the Occupy Wall Street group? “God bless them, for their spontaneity. It’s independent … it’s young, it’s spontaneous, and it’s focused. And it’s going to be effective.” This was an effulgence of emotional fantasy. Her voice overflowed with fantasy.

Such feelings, so detached from reality, yet so immediately sincere, simply indicate an established fantasy life in which non-reality seems fully real, and is fully invested in. This is called delusion. But this pertains to her political and business life. The personal, family life is an entirely different matter.

Nancy Pelosi, 73, as advertised on the www.Plasticsurgerystar.com website

Nor shall we comment on any suspected artificial beauty aids employed by Mrs. Pelosi, such as Botox, liposuction, breast enhancement, or any other such visuals. We can just say she looks good for her age.

But so does Liz Trotta.


And Trotta doesn’t live in a fantasy world. Liz Trotta, daughter of Italian immigrants, certainly earned her way to success. Trotta is the epitome of rationale, with one exceptionally tasteful flavor of common sense. It is captivating to listen to her, not for some sublimated implication of fantasy, but for the healthy cleansing of nonsense.

Liz Trotta, 76, with that tell-tale somber look, which makes her sarcastic commentary the more entertaining. The fact that she’s right just makes it all delicious..

Trotta is a commentator for Fox News at the present, though she earned international acclaim long before. She’s worked for the Washington Times, NBC, CBS, She has won three Emmy awards and two Overseas Press Club awards. She graduated from Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, and also holds a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Boston University.

The woman is an intellect, not a politician. She doesn’t need to persuade by deception or delusion. She is a conservative, not a liberal. When liberals get older, they rely more and more on fantasy. When normal people get older, they get more conservative. It is the difference of using the mind and conscience, not the emotion and ego.




Okay, Liz Trotta is from New Haven. I’m biased a bit in her favor. I lived in New Haven from the mid-’70′s until 1991. I know legions of Italians there. I wasn’t so politically minded back then, but, I was conservative by nature. I just wish I had known of Trotta earlier.



Years ago, there was an interview, either in Time Magazine or National Geographic, of some Italians in Italy. It was a variety of subjects and interviews. There was featured a mature, Italian quarry worker, a marble quarry worker. I’ll never forget it. He said, “Marble is like an Italian woman. Cold, hard, but sensitive, and beautiful.”



I suppose Nancy Pelosi publicly exploits the “sensitive” side, while Liz Trotta the cold, hard side. The fact is, both women have an abundance of both sides, so, the one they show means the other they don’t. Which would you rather have, personally? If you value the truth, you’ll chose Liz Trotta, immediately. The truth, to an self-indulgent, will always see cold and hard. But, you can know there is a wonderful, sensitive side awaiting in the wings. After you’ve mistakenly, tragically chosen the publicly sensitive (the liberal), you’ll discover too late that all that awaits you is the cold and the hard.



Alto belle!

Feminism and the Pinkification of Professional Football

A timely post about from www.badeagle.com about the U.S. game of football. This follows this post about George Soros and Mark Zuckerberg attempting to manipulate the U.S. Congress. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

Feminism and the Pinkification of Professional Football


by David Yeagley   Everyone has seen the pink footgear, pink body flags, and pink gloves being paraded on the NFL fields all over the country. Everyone knows that it’s about breast cancer awareness, and that it is a woman’s campaign.   Hardly a more worthy or important campaign could be thus launched. Yet, this ominous intrusion into the man’s world is tainted by raw feminism of the recent past which put women reporters in men’s locker rooms. Something is deeply amiss, despite the equality of death and spousal commitment.   While it is true that what affects one spouse intimately affects the other; while men’s prostate cancer has been ‘advertised’ by women as though women get prostate cancer also (by proxy, by spousal affectation in the conjugal, physical relation); the fact is, as Limbaugh pointed out, there is no campaign for men’s testicular cancer, or anything about particularly masculine forms of cancer. (Fact is, men sometimes get breast cancer also, rarely.)   Strong men are always the target of all women. Women are abjectly attracted to strong men, of any color, usually. The women generally looks to the man as the provider and protector, one way or another. But feminism as a political movement hates men. It is attracted to the man as an enemy, as something to be degraded, despised, and emasculated. (This is what the anti-Indian warrior image is all about. The strongest image of all must be removed unquestionably!)

Women simply cannot leave men alone. Something like professional football is irresistible–by any woman, of any political brand or hormonal condition. It is almost as if the women must participate in the strength of a man, be like him (like Xena), or attack him for being a man, for being stronger than her.

Perhaps my view here is itself tainted by my earlier experience of raw feminism at Yale Divinity. One of the last bastions of the male profession, the ministry was invaded by very aggressive woman who, for the most part, were not considered the generally attractive type of woman, and could never market themselves as objects of sexual attraction. In other words, there was a lot of resentment and hurt in most of the female seminarians. They wanted to compete with men on an equal basis. After all, there were half of the image of God, and expected to be regarded as such. It was a kind of reaction, from anger. They couldn’t be regarded as beautiful, but they were determined to be regarded as equal.


It was a sad and disappointing experience for me, personally, and affected me ever after.
I note also that, in the recent edition (not yet on line), Fall 2013, of Reflections (a YDS quarterly) is on “the art of aging,” and features old women, in articles, by women authors, and in female photography. Of course, what could be a more natural loss of marketable beauty than aging? Liberalism, of course, wants all to be equal, always, at the cost of every natural inclination.

The photo featured in the first article in the YDS Reflections, Fall 2013 edition. From the Marianne Gontarz York collection

Female homosexuality is a major element of feminist “equality,” of course. In an environment like Yale Divinity, it can be very aggressively advocated, as homosexuality in general. It isn’t always the case, but one dare not protest it any too loudly when it is the case. It would be the epitome of un-Christian behavior, to condemn anyone for anything so personal.




So American professional football is going to have to take it on the chin, so to speak. It is a feminist tackle from behind. A devastating blow, leaving a professional concussion on the game, indeed.



Note that move of the kick-off line from the 20 to the 30 yard line. There are no more kick-off returns now. It is a wasted gesture. This is one of the first, most notable emasculations of the game. Why was this exciting, dramatic play cut out? The injuries occur during punt returns, where there is little blocking available. What are the stats on kick-off return injuries? Some stats do show that there are more injuries on the kick-off returns, but they don’t say what kind of injuries. Why, it’s a full 2%! And the reduction of injuries is a full 0.2%. Great accomplishment.



It is liberalism invading another American cultural tradition, trying to destroy it, or to at least control it with tyranny. Unfortunately, the breast cancer campaign is their front line offense now. True, there are many men on the field and in the crowd whose lives have been affected by their wives’ breast cancer. That is undeniable. It’s just a shame that such a sincere concern must be ‘infected’ and inappropriately injected into the men’s sports world. It is a most egregious inpropriety.



But, propriety has never been a principle of liberalism. Only coercion. Only tyranny. Only oppression and control.



Men wear pink now. Men must bow to women–mean, angry women, who are using normal, feminine women as their offensive line.



And so this is the new mascot for all professional football: a pink ribbon. It’s all about women’s breasts now, the female protrusions. It’s like some primitive goddess worship on the front line. Save the breasts! Bow to the breast!

Redskins Forever!

A timely post about from www.badeagle.com about the team the Washington Redskins. This follows this post about the Muslim claim for discovering America. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

Redskins Forever!


by David Yeagley

American Indians have only one positive image in the world today: the warrior. We earned that one, with blood, and white America has forever honored it. Indian leaders who protest Indian sports names and mascots are taking not only a liberal, white, self-destructive, emasculating position, but also a very cowardly position. In fact, these Indian leaders offer no alternative but self-removal.



Kevin Gover, Director of the NMAI.

Gover is Pawnee, the tribe that always

fought with the U.S. government, and

always against other Indian tribes.

Ray Halbritter, chief of the Oneida, does not represent Indian people, but only his tribe. Kevin Gover, Director of the National Museum of the American Indian, not only does not represent American Indians, but purposely represents many other indigenous people of the Western Hemisphere. This is not American Indian representation at all, but its dilution.



Ray Halbritter, Chief of the Oneida

one very advanced, business-oriented

tribe of American Indians, indeed.

Both these men were feature on Gretchen Carlson’s The Real Story (FoxNews), today, October 10, 2013. Carlson, like most conservative (and relatively conservative) hosts have no idea what Indian people ourselves actually think. The conservatives haven’t researched anything. They understand no talking points. And they are completely unaware of the conservative Indians in the country.

There have been only two professional surveys of Indian people at large: Peter Harris, (2002) and University of Pennsylvania (Annenberg), (2004). Harris found 83% of Indians were not offended or didn’t care. Annenberg found 91% were not offended or didn’t care. This included consideration of the name “Redskins.”

Why do these “fair and balanced” Fox News reporters never reference these surveys? It is as if the issue no longer involves Indian people at all. Just white liberals and white conservatives.

And what surveys have Gover and Halbritter conducted? Do they have any idea how Indian people really feel, or just how their personal associates feel?

I am acutely disappointed in the way this issue is being handled at this point–by conservative media.

I might add, I wrote three letters to the United Nations about the removal of Indian images. It is virtual genocide. It is a cultural cleansing, really. Here are the letters, from September, 2011:

American Indian Genocide: An Appeal

Indian Removal II: 2nd Appeal to the U.N.<br />
American Indian Images: An Indigenous Right

And now Carlson reports that the U.N. is advocates the removal of “Redskins.” What could be expected from a godless, liberal world organization?

I’ve written numerous articles on Indian mascots. The message is simple: Indians of modern times have a bad image: alcoholism, diabetes, suicide, domestic violence, dishonesty (including the whole casino scene), and liberals have made sure that we have the image of professional protesters, whiners, and perpetual bellyachers. No, I can’t speak for all Indians, but these images don’t sit well with me.

We do still have the warrior image. That is the one that the white man respects–even printing it on his currency! Personally, I want to see Indian warrior images on every school, college, and professional sports team in the country. Indians own that image!

Our fathers earned that image. We dishonor our fathers when we seek to remove that image. This is a self-destructive path–which liberals have provided for us.

And remember, as Halbritter admitted on the interview, it’s about money. Under his leadership, the Oneida is a major contributor to the NFL. Why? So he can power to remove the Redskins name. Obviously. Dishonesty? Manipulation? Bribery? Blackmail?

I’d rather have the warrior image.



Touch The Clouds, 1838-1905, Teton Lakota

When Freedom Fails

A timely post about from www.BadEagle.com about Liberal Censorship. This follows this post about CAIR. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

When Freedom Fails


by David Yeagley

Is there no First Amendment? Have white oedipal liberals so aggrandized the half-imaginary Negro plight that no one can freely express his actual feelings? Since there is absolutely no privacy anymore, perhaps it really doesn’t make any difference when, where, or how you express yourself. The tyrannical liberals have your number, and you will go to jail.



Mr. Darren Walp, Confederate flag-waver.

In Camden, New Jersey, a man was arrested and jailed for waving a Confederate flag near an apartment complex, and reportedly shouting racial slurs. This all happened at a Toby Keith concert in Camden. The apartment complex is populated mostly by minorities, and was apparently adjacent to the concert setting, the Susquehanna Bank Center.



Too much for liberals? They prefer the Mexican flag.

The racially protective (i.e., biased) liberal AP news article carefully tabulated the charges against 33-year-old Darren Walp of Ridley Park, Pa.:

1) bias intimidation

2) harassment

3) criminal trespassing.

This is criminal irony on all sides. First of all, where did the charge “bias intimidation” come from? Did Mr. Walp threaten anyone? We’re given absolutely no real clue as to what he said, other than “racial slurs.” What exactly are the criteria for that charge? Let’s be exact. What is the legal definition of a racial slur, in writing, from the law books? Did the witness have Walp on video or tape? Did any police witness anything, other than the flag?

“Hate speech,” for example, is not really legal term. It is the most vague, emotional, “liberal” accusation which oedipal white liberals make against other whites, using any and every non-white race as their tool. Most of this is based on attorneys’ free-wheeling application of general concepts from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), and it is clearly produced an unending stream of lucrative, fame-grabbing, court-overloading cases throughout the country. It is wholly subjective, infantilizing, utterly inconsistent, and makes mockery of freedom, manhood, and character. (Even in Japan, there remains a issue between media and actual law.)

We still don’t know what Darren Walp said.

Harassment? Whom did he harass? Did he have a weapon? Did he threaten anyone? Technically, what constitutes harassment in this case? Did anyone feel physically endangered? Did anyone lose a paycheck, have their electricity cut off, or have their BBQ grill knocked over? Did Walp stalk anyone? Did he single anyone out for concentrated “intimidation?” This is an acute vagary.

Criminal trespassing? That might be legitimate, but even in this charge, there is fundamental uncertainty. All kinds of people, visitors, relatives, etc., come and go in apartment complexes. They are not accused of criminal trespassing. Was this “Royal Court Apartment” complex, in New Jersey’s “most impoverished city” some kind of gated community? Do you have to show a photo ID to get in?

What about the millions of Mexicans and other foreigners who cross the U.S. borders daily? What about criminal trespassing there? What about La Raza, on the radio, in the news, in the media–and their endless stream of Mexican flags and anti-American verbal vomit? Isn’t that the equivalent of “bias intimidation”? Isn’t that the same as “hate speech?” Who’s kidding whom? Racist-based anti-Americanism is most definitely harassment, bias intimidation, and often performed by criminal trespassers.

We don’t know what Darren Walp said. We do know that waving a Confederate flag in Camden New Jersey was certainly a gesture of historical significance. We also know Toby Keith is from Oklahoma, though that’s probably unrelated, though the eastern half of the state (mostly the Indian tribes), sided with the Confederacy.

So, in the end, “rights” are for the non-white, non-Americans. This is what the white oedipal liberals are all about–destroying the heritage of their own fathers. They simply use race–the non-white races, to do it.



The liberal flag, the anti-American token banner.



Waving the Mexican flag, claiming America as Mexico, honoring the criminal trespassers, this is all wonderful for liberals. Waving the Confederate flag, which stood for the homeland, not for a political vagary or superior moral fantasy, is “intimidating.”

Mere wordicians, attorneys, rule America. It is autolytic. It is self-destructive. Law has become the curse of America. There is no feeling, no patriotism, nor love of land or country present in the law. The law is now to prevent patriotism. Patriotism is nationalism. Nationalism closes the door to anti-Americanism–which liberals thrive on.

Posted by David Yeagley

Editorial: Three (or Four) MORE WARS??

Editorial

Now are we going to fight three (or four) more wars in addition to the ones in last week's editorial? Are we going to fight North Korea? Syria? Chechnya? and is the Gang of Eight amnesty going to set up an internal war?

Editorial: Bad Eagle Advises Three Wars be Declared!

Editorial

A very insightful blogger, David Yeagley at www.badeagle.com, makes the case for two foreign wars here and here, as well as one domestic war here. Any comments?

Chaos in New York, New Jersey

 A very interesting post from www.badeagle.com about the government chaos in New York and New Jersey. This follows this post about the San Francisco Giants celebratory riots. This follows this post about Civil Unrest. This follows this post about a race hoax at U.T. Austin. This follows this post about free phones for welfare recipients. This follows this post about Emmit Till. This follows this post about the likelihood of urban warfare in the U.S. and this about violent Flash Mobs which can result in activities such as Knockout King. You can read a very interesting book HERE.

Chaos in New York, New Jersey


by David Yeagley



The photo op hugs of Obama and New Jersey governor Chris Christie are over. Obama came, and left. That’s it. The rest is a riot, literally. Its all about looting.





NJ Gov. Chris Christie welcomes Pres. Obama.



Or is the media selling hysteria again?



Volunteer professional utility workers from out of state (and in state), coming to help people in New York and New Jersey are being turned away by local union workers because the volunteers are non-union. The liberal Democrat unions would rather have everyone suffer, and maybe die, than break their union power (and benefits). Even local utility workers are not trusted by the people.



Staten Island (the white, working, middle class?) is totally abandoned. Worst of all.



NYC Mayor Bloomberg refused to let the National Guard in–because he doesn’t want any guns on the street. He’s using huge generators in Central Park to power the media for the NY Marathon on Sunday. Why can’t generators be shipped in or airlifted in from elsewhere?



In many places, there are large neighborhoods with no heat, fuel, food, or water, and another monster winter storm is moving in for all.



This situation is worse than Katrina, in New Orleans. Riots, looting, hunger, and freezing temperatures, it is unbelievable.



The Democrats are in charge of all this. They were very quick to blame Bush and the Republicans for every discomfort and want during the 2009 storm on the Gulf Coast.



Is there any reason the National Guard cannot air lift supplies and drop them off in parachutes? (I suggested this on Twitter from the first day after the storm.) This is what the National Guard is for–to help masses of people in crisis. They are trained for this. But the Obama administration doesn’t like to use trained people to do trained jobs. Ask Delta Force.



Where’s that Democrat craze for martial law?



Where is all the efficiency, the improved service? The Democrat governors promise to cut all the government red tape, all the regulations–all the things that Democrats love, because they want to get help directly to the people. This is unbelievable irony. Democrats promise to deliver the people through lifting the tyrannical impositions they themselves have placed upon the people.



What happened to the Occupy Wall Street spirit? That great outdoors spirit of camping out? The Democrats did better providing for the anarchist slobs of OWS than they are real people in need.



This is a spectacle of criminal neglect, indifference, and dereliction of duty.



Exactly that kind of behavior we see in the Democrat leadership of the Benghazi fiasco. Will there be deaths in New York and New Jersey that we can properly call “murder” by Democrat fiat?



No power for New York. No power to the people. They’ll all have to tough it out like good hippies, anarchists, and liberals. This is the government of their choice. Even when average liberals work, and work hard, it doesn’t change their delusional ideas about government. They still look to the nanny state to take care of them. Perhaps these horrible, tragic conditions will awaken them all to the fact that the government simply cannot take care of anyone–but itself. The masses cannot depend on the few Democrat elitists with large mouths and empty promises.



Christie may have thought he was really going to get some help, quick. That was more of an expression of desperate need than of sound reason from experience.



Bloomberg didn’t want Obama coming into NYC, but he also doesn’t want the National Guard. Apparently, all he wants is the Marathon


Obama can’t even act like a president for more than a few photo ops. He runs from serious problems. He is afraid of the military. He appears quite cowardly, actually. Liars usually harbor profound fear. They are never sure what is going to happen, or when their lies are going to be exposed.



Remember Benghazi. That says it all. Bye-bye, Obama.

Can We Save America?

A very interesting post from www.badeagle.com about some of America's problems. This follows this post about Mitt Romney's election problems.  This follows this post about some of the music that was poplular during 2011. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!

Can We Save America?


by David Yeagley



Is there any hope for America? As we approach the new year, 2012, do we have any reason to expect anything different or better in the future? Is there any evidence that anything will change in Washington?



No, no, and no. Only the most naïve and blind person would think that America will recover. Politicians and conservative radio talkers may campaign and entertain with the idea of restoration; optimism is wondrously marketable–especially in times of horrible social depression; there may be a great temptation to hope, and even a moral obligation to make efforts towards rejuvenation. Yet, the basic steps required to restore America will never be taken. Human nature abuses everything America has ever stood for. We deny ourselves the remedy. Recovery is disallowed.



I would suggest a few steps, for the record, nevertheless. And these suggestions will never be more than fleeting notions of reality. What our society needs is immediate consequences for wrong doing, not enabling, not encouragement, not reward. Just consequence. How likely is that? So, call these suggestions something like the last nail in the coffin of dead hope.



Voting rights must be limited to qualified people.





The secret of Communism’s success in this country is the voting populace. The right to vote, in the name of “democracy” or “equality,” is actually a delusion, and secures the very lowest, more inefficient, self-destructive policies for the country. Mass voting destroys the character of the candidates, and, in order to secure the most votes, the politician promises the most material prosperity to the most people. The United States government has been growing like a cancer since the Civil War, and more and more people have become dependent on the government.



Therefore, the solution is to disallow most people from voting. Most people are uninformed, misinformed, selfish, and unfit even to be citizens, let alone voting citizens–with a say in any government whatsoever. There must be rigid qualification for voting.



The Right to Reproduction must be Limited



This isn’t about abortion. This is about sterilization. Sterilization is logical and rational in the matter of population control. Abortion is not socially rational. Mass sterilization is. A person who brings another human being into this world knowing that he cannot provide for it, knowing that the government will pay for it, is a criminal, and should lose all his freedom, and certainly his right to vote. No such offspring should ever be allowed to vote, either–unless he proves himself a very different kind of person.



Nothing is more useless and demoralizing that dependents who believe it is their right to be dependent, dependents who aggrandize their welfare expectations to the level of desert and honor. Dependents have bankrupted our society, and should be punished by a natural corrective process.



America must have right to war.



A nation cannot survive without the ability to declare war on other nations, and to destroy the government of another nation. The United States government has robbed America of not only the dignity and honor of victory, but the necessity of self-defense. America is wholly incapable of any significant aggression or defense at this time. There are Third World countries anxious to break America’s power, and the opportunity for them to do so increases daily. There appears no victory on the horizon for America’s forces anywhere, not even on our own borders. America is no longer allowed to know what victory is.



America must control citizenship.



The privileges of citizenship are not natural, not inevitable, and not rights. The each must be earned, over time, with due effort. The idea that anyone can simply cross the national border and be a citizen is completely irrational. Only politicians advocate such an idea–for obvious reasons. They see more voters. The social immaturity generated by the American political system must end.



In her last article, Ann Coulter notes that illegal immigration and Obamacare, if not remedied in the next couple of years, will essentially end the America we know (and which most of us have loved). “America will begin its ineluctable descent into becoming a worthless Western European country, with rotten health care, no money for defense and ever-increasing federal taxes to support the nanny state,” Coulter prophecies.



Politicians will certainly not remedy either illegal immigration or Obamacare. It isn’t going to happen. The current is to strong, for too long, in the wrong direction. That’s just the way it is.



Rush Limbaugh used to say, “It’s over!” back when the Clintons were in office. It was. It’s been over, since the Civil War. The federal government became something it was never supposed to be. The overthrow of America, by its own immature people and selfish politicians, was inevitable.



Conservative commentary is just part of the entertainment business. Patriotism is passé. Love of country is a Romantic notion of the 19th century. The country has simply changed, already, into something the fathers would disown. America is a dream of the past. The future will not see her again. Historical circumstance is inimitable, and ignorance has prevailed–ignorance generated by selfish, irreligious hedonists.

American Puritanism and Modern Liberal Morality

A very interesting post from www.badeagle.com about libralism and Puritanism. This follows this post about white women in the U.S. This follows this post about some of the music that was poplular during 2011. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself.

American Puritanism and Modern Liberal Morality


by David Yeagley



The International Monetary Fund has prophecied the fall of America. China will rule by 2016, five years from now. America will finally become the failed third world country liberals have always wanted. The elite will remain elite, in unparalleled wealth, but the American population will have been “equalized,” or, deeply downgraded. The white oedipal liberal Communists will have won the war of values.



America is indeed suffering a collision of values. It is not a natural process. It is the stupendous effort of America’s traitorous enemies. It is agonizing. The country’s Puritan history is facing the challenge of change, and it feels terribly wrong to all true Americans. Modern “liberal” values seem immoral in comparison to the original values of the nation. Must the contrast be so violent? Is there any middle ground?





Nathaniel Hawthorne (1804-1864)



The Puritan way involved a self-discipline that is incomprehensible to most modern Americans–so enslaved to self-indulgent, push-button pleasures and permanent entitlements. Yet, the Puritan way was fast disappearing even in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s day (1804-1864). He tried to depict the writhings of that contrast in The Scarlet Letter (1850), and in nearly all his other works, novel or short story. Change from the Purtian moral way meant living a new, immoral way. For those pained by such “progress,” the only solace was a vague, torturous ambiguity, or a sustained, conscious uncertainty, for which disposition Hawthorne as well as Herman Melville and other early 19th century authors were so famous. They groped for a middle ground as the adolescent society progressed from childhood clarity to the delusions of adulthood. They ended up “romanticizing” morality as some quaint notion of the past, “when times were better.”



Personal responsibility, the fundamental social moral of the Puritan–the Judeo-Christian morality of the American culture, was later called “capitalism.” This is somewhat unfortunate. The term is automatically juxtaposed with Communism. Capitalism is a economic term which meant you were basically free to make what you would out of your life. Morever, it was your responsibility to do so. America was a wide open opportunity to make something of yourself. If you did not, you were an immoral louse, a ne’er-do-well bum, and you were condemned by society for your lethargy and irresponsibility. You were a sinner and a fool.



Communism tempts all such leech-minded people with the thought that it is someone else’s responsibility to take care of them. This is childhood certainty gone socially retarded. Communism is a blank check for the elite tyrannists, that’s all. It is based on the reticence of the weak, the fearful, and the self-deceived to fend for themselves.



Modern liberal morality has it that it is wrong to be strong. It is immoral to be responsible, and arrogant to advocate independence. This is the clash of morality. Conservative (Puritan) morality says it’s wrong to be weak. The individual has a choice in the matter.



Now, the measure of material wealth, or “property” is, unfortunately, the standard of success of these competing moralities. Communism says all should have less (except for the elite tyrannists who rule in Communism); Puritanism says each individual has the responsibility to accomplish whatever he can. Some do better than others. Of course, laws had to be made to prevent those with colossal achievement from ruling mercilessly over those who didn’t do so well. That inequity right there is the open door to Communism, at least rhetorically. The rich inevitably abuse the poor. Communism pretends to counter that imbalance; but, in fact, Communism creates a worse imbalance. More people have less, fewer people have astoundingly more.



The lyiny black African Communist traitor in the White House is the emptomical example of the deceit of Communism. Americans suffer want, while the Negro in the White House parties 24/7, with great rigor and stunning expense. This is Communism. This is racism, as well. This is making white America pay for historical sins. There is no atonement. The cup of black indignation is bottomless.



But the truth of ideology is concrete. The end of deception is abundantly exposed. Materialism is not the basis of Puritanism, but personal responsibility for oneself. Materialism is the basis of Communism, and those who preach are elite tyrannists, willing to see masses have much less, while they themselves luxuriate publicly, and dramtically.



Puritanism never promised everyone a Cadillac. But Communism promises everyone a Volkswagen (like Hitler did). Are you more comfortable with a government-promised simple car, or a chance to get a Cadillac? The white oedipal liberals and their Negro minstrel want you to play it safe, by their rules. Don’t gamble. Don’t risk. You’re better off with four wheels that roll (if you can afford the gas), than some immature, irresponsible, immoral hope of a Cadillac.



Thus, modern liberal morality presents itself as more American, more conservative, and more Puritan than Puritanism. Modern liberal morality wants you to have less, to be happy with less (while the elite liberals have continually more). Liberals want you to be more humble, to have less hope for improvement, and to be satisfied with much lower standards–material and moral.



It’s an interesting ploy, and outrageous in its success. Liberals have made right seem wrong, and personal responsibility look like rebellion. Liberals make original American values seem immoral, selfish, and individualism seem satanic. To surrender to the Communist sway is made to look like a religious conversion. It is the image of Christ. Give up your arms, cast away the burden of responsibility. Be free! Absorb ye into Group think. Be part of something bigger that youself. Worship ye Humanity. Should be easy enough. You’re human.

American White Women Adopting Dark, Foreign Children

A very interesting post from www.badeagle.com about white women in the U.S. This follows this post about a comedian named George Lopez.  This follows this post about some of the music that was poplular during 2011. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself.

American White Women Adopting Dark, Foreign Children


by David Yeagley



Why are American white women so anxious to adopt a “dusky little heathen” child from the Third World?



It’s the latest fad of the White Woman Saviour, and it carries high status. A white American women must adopt a Third World child (preferably a non-white) to really keep up with the savior image. It’s a grand American tradition, dating back to the early 19th century Christian missions. Only today, you don’t have to be Christian at all. You just have to be white, female, (and preferably single). Look at Laura Ingraham, famous “conservative” radio talk show host. One child (Maria, a Guatamalan girl) wasn’t enough. She had to adopt a Russian boy, Dmitri.





Laura Ingraham, and her adopted


Russian boy, Dmitri.


So what are the real issues involved is this social phenomenon?



White women are obviously still operating on the grand old Christian missionary template. But what about the “single mom” bit? Is that an extra, thrown in to aggrandize the nobility of motherhood? Is that about self or about the child? What happened to the father figure? Is that not important any more? Ingraham is quite forthright about her Christianity (Catholic). Is the father figure not in that picture?



And why the craze for foreign babies? America has plenty of “home grown” infants and children available. Shouldn’t an American patriot mother’s first concern be for American babies? Why the rush to bring alien children here? Are Third World (or even European) countries anxiously adopting American children? Of course not. Let’s be honest: America is the dream country. America is where everyone wants to come. America is the place they want their children to come.



Angelina Jolie really dramatized the role of the American white woman savior grabbing up the darkest, blackest babies, from deepest, darkest, most miserable Africa (as well as Cambodian, Vietnamese, and possibly Syrian). She and Madonna. That’s the extreme, of course. That is the zenith of the white woman savior image. Shall we not ask, however, why she didn’t adopt an American Negro child, if race was the issue? Or why not simply adopt an American white child? Is there something wrong with that? Or, is it not dramatic enough to suit the heroic vision of self-importanc? Do these white women have any knowledge, or even concern, about the foreign child’s present and future feelings, or the adopted child’s psychological development?





Angelina Jolie, white woman savior of non-white babies.



It is difficult to avoid the immediate conclusion that these American white woman saviors are acting out their own sense of superiority and advantage. (Some might say, guilt, but, that’s not too likely.) They are romatically reaching out to the farthest corners of the globe to save a desperately lost and innocent child. What could be more noble, more heroic, more American? (Key focus here is on “noble”, and “heroic,” that is to say, on the woman’s feelings.)



Alas, it doesn’t always work out so well. One white woman savior family in Shelbyville, Tennessee figured they got a bad deal, and sent their little alien angel back to Siberia. Russia threatens to suspend all American adoptions? Please! A great blessing it would be. What do we need 61,600 Russian kids over here for? What about the American kids that need adoption? May all foreign countries quickly follow Russia’s suit. No more non-American babies adopted by Americans!



This whole international adoption routine is all a social status scheme. It insults all countries, who love to hate America anyway– while obviously trying to take every possible advantage of America. Americans disgrace America when they fall into this flesh fad of adopting foreigners. Sure, there are some wonderful stories. Fairy tale stories. It truly is a splendorous dream, and it has worked out beautifully in some cases, or certainly as well as anyone could ever expect when a child is taken from its home and put in another, foreign home, and of a dramatically different race.



But that’s not really the point. This is about nationalism, or, we should say, patriotism versus individualism. The individual fantasy can, unfortunately, often override the good of the community, or the country. It is as if a white woman savior sees America as the best nest of the world, and she wants to bring up the worst of the worst here. This makes her feel, in fact, patriotic. What more noble thing could an American white woman do? Yet, objectively, in terms of the America, this “customary” call for the world’s most unfortunate needs to be reevaluated–especially when there are American-born children in dire straights. Is it less patriotic for an American woman to reach out to Americans?



I think we can dispense with the foreign vision at this point. Our Kenyan President has certainly reduced the American image to one disdained, having offended just about every important country in the world, and having done little or nothing for those in greatest need. Barry “Obama” Soetoro, as the great Black Father has done everything he can to denigrate America (and glorify himself), so that foreign countries see America only as a free ticket to a home, a Cadillac, and a college education–while these things must be denied white Americans.





Madonna, and her African boy.



America has had enough of foreigners. Take it from an Indian. It is time to close the doors. Nationhood demands it. No one would ever expect a Kenyan to become tribal chairman of the Arapaho, or a Nigerian to become chief of the Cheyenne. No one would expect a Saudi Arabian to become Prime Minister of Israel. Yes, an alien, lying black African became president of the United States–but that’s only because of the white liberal Communist traitors manipulating their way into power. It isn’t because it was the right, moral thing to do. It was an Oedipal thing to do. It was, collectively, a Freudian thing to do, perverted, self-destructive, and uneducated.



I say American white woman should adopt American white children. This business of bringing in the “dusky little heathen” is racism. It is an incredibly careless, selfish move, actually. It is bad for the child, and for the country. Yes, it is a noble instinct in the American white woman. It truly is. But, it is gone awry at this point, and needs advice and guidance.



Perhaps the white race needs some humility at this point. The white woman should honor her own white race. Does she feel above race? Does she really feel so suprior to other races as to save them? I say her white “racial” capital has used up. She needs to love her own race. If she doesn’t, she is a curse to the country. Beware.