Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Movies and the Culture Wars

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about movies. This follows this post about music.  For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.


Movies and the Culture Wars

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!
Sign In | Sign Up
×
The 63rd Golden Globe Awards in January 2006 shocked some people with four awards validating director Ang Lee's movie Brokeback Mountain . Academy Award nominations followed, and this story about two homosexual cowboys received considerable media attention and promotion around the world. The movie attempts to warm the audience to a sensual relationship between two married men. These are not the cowboys of your parents' era.
My generation could hardly imagine John Wayne falling in love with another cowboy. I don't think it would have made Clint Eastwood's day either. Yet Hollywood producers try to convince us that we must lighten up. Cowboys used to be quintessentially masculine role models that spoke of a lifestyle that defined bedrock values including displaying men as leaders of traditional families.
Shaping our culture
There was a time when movies validated traditional Christian values rather than pushing the limits of what many thought to be appropriate. We have come a long way from the epic Civil War picture, Gone With the Wind, first shown on the big screen in late 1940. At the time this cinematic showpiece was accused of pushing the limits when Rhett Butler said a four-letter word and left his shirt unbuttoned. Many movie theaters boycotted this risqué rendition of Margaret Mitchell's tale of sacrifice and hardship during America's bloody Civil War.
The makers of movies and television shows have often been accused of moving society along a liberal path, all the while insisting that they just reflect the latest trends.
For Christians, this is another test of our bedrock values. Either we spot the slippery, moral slide, or we float slowly along with the murky current of change. At the end time, the Bible reveals that the state of mankind will become worse and not better. “But evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived” (2 Timothy 3:13 2 Timothy 3:13But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
American King James Version×
).
A movie comparison
A good illustration of this remaking of American values is revealed in two different movies based on a similar script: Academy Award winners High Noon in 1952 and Unforgiven in 1992 .
Peter Gibbon, in his book A Call to Heroism , makes the case that people today have a different view of heroes and a different culture to evaluate them. He compares these two movies produced 40 years apart. In the earlier version, Gary Cooper won the Academy Award for Best Actor for his portrayal of a U.S. marshal in High Noon. Forty years later, Unforgiven also won four Academy Awards including Best Picture.
High Noon opens in the morning sunshine with a wedding, while Unforgiven opens in the night rain in a brothel. High Noon starts with a kiss; Unforgiven with the slashing of a prostitute. Will Kane, the hero of High Noon , is a U.S. marshal; Will Munny, the hero of Unforgiven , was a reformed killer and alcoholic reduced to pig farming. High Noon was set in the town of Hadleyville; Unforgiven in a town called Big Whiskey whose sheriff, Little Bill, was a sadist.
High Noon ends with order restored. Unforgiven ends essentially as it opens–in the dark and rain, in sorrow and violence, with anarchy ascendant. High Noon was about physical bravery and moral courage, about overcoming fear and fatigue, about doing the right thing no matter what the cost. Unforgiven was about weakness and revenge (Peter Gibbon, A Call to Heroism : Renewing America's Vision of Greatness , pp. 144-145).
What's the message?
A day at the movies offers a titillating opportunity to experience the latest adventure with high-tech graphics and special effects, including dynamic digital sounds. But the most critical part of high profile entertainment is the message that is communicated. Movies have often been an accurate commentary of culture. Directors feel they are reflecting the world around them. Arguably, the film industry picks up on marginal themes and moods that often shape the attitudes of others.
More and more people use sensate imagery to form their values rather than the written Word of God that makes them think through a scenario and compare it with the moral laws given to mankind. Powerful images, especially those coupled with high technology, sound and glamour, can move the emotions and taunt the conscience. Are you wise enough to notice the subtle, and sometimes not-so-subtle, provocations?
A few days ago, my wife and daughter were watching a 1942 black-and-white film about famous baseball player Lou Gehrig, The Pride of the Yankees, with swelling big band sounds and formal clothing (men wore ties and ladies were in dresses). My initial inclination was to see what else was on (a bad habit of mine), but I soon realized this was not a cheap, old movie (starring Gary Cooper and Babe Ruth), but a touching tribute of courage, love and responsibility. I don't advocate that we go back to black-and-white Turner Classics, but audiences don't need crassness and vulgarity to entertain them. Good values can entertain and also inspire!
How to make a difference
The issue here is who defines values. Is it Hollywood or the Holy Bible? The way to make a difference is to boycott the type of material that degrades Christian values. There was a time when the majority of people recognized when something was outside acceptable bounds. The “bounds” seem to be moving more and more with some advocating that “bounds” are archaic.
The current interest in culture wars is encouraging, when we consider the number of people who feel some things in our culture have gone too far. But how far the entertainment industry will go largely depends on the next generations of ticket buyers. Patrons can vote with their wallets and decide what to put into their minds.
Perhaps there are a few people reading this who might want to make a few movies of their own, based on vertical themes that inspire and teach. How wonderful it would be to have access to good, wholesome entertainment that takes the high road of morality and virtue. The future belongs to our young adults. If you want to win the culture wars, speak up and make it clear what you want to see at the movies. VT

You might also be interested in...

Is it true that "anything goes"? Some people believe you can do anything you...






Thursday, September 17, 2015

How Hollywood's war movies have changed

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about movies. This follows this post about anti-Americanism. This follows this post about Syria and western weakness. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
Please follow me here for continued posts.





World News and Trends

How Hollywood's war movies have changed

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!
Sign In | Sign Up
×
Those of you who have been moviegoers for many years may have noticed a basic shift in the emphasis of war films in recent decades. Consider the 1992 movie A Few Good Men.
The villain was a high-ranking army officer (played by Jack Nicholson) stationed at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, so often in the news lately. The movie was basically about how army lawyers uncovered the big mistake that he had sought to cover up. His deeds were exposed in a military court and his closing remarks on the stand were not unlike the disgraced Captain Queeg's in the 1954 film The Caine Mutiny.
Other more recently released titles are The Jacket (2005), Courage Under Fire (1996) and Three Kings (1999). All portray the American military negatively. They feature such themes as U.S. troops committing atrocities during the first Gulf War, a friendly-fire tragedy, mistreatment of a female officer, the corruption of the American military establishment and the betrayal of allied nations.
Revolution (1985), about the American war for independence, apparently showed national hero George Washington in a negative light. Even Dances With Wolves (1990) compared the American military unfavorably with Sioux warriors. Notwithstanding Saving Private Ryan (1998), the general run of war films in recent decades has been mostly unpatriotic and derogatory toward the U.S. military.
Media author and commentator Michael Medved summed up this sad situation in a fairly recent speech. He said: “The truth of the matter is that war movies have changed in a fundamental way, and I would submit to you, a dangerous way for the health of our culture and for the strength of the [American] dream.”
Mr. Medved further asked: “Why has Hollywood decided seemingly illogically to make movies in the United States that depict the American military as unrepresentative and twisted, America as a malignant force in the world and all wars as fruitless?”
Those who remember viewing war movies with patriotic themes during World War II can easily see the sharp contrast between the way the U.S. military was depicted then and now. Our popular culture is in serious need of redemption. (Source: Imprimis .)

Thursday, September 20, 2012

American Puritanism and Modern Liberal Morality

A very interesting post from www.badeagle.com about libralism and Puritanism. This follows this post about white women in the U.S. This follows this post about some of the music that was poplular during 2011. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself.

American Puritanism and Modern Liberal Morality


by David Yeagley



The International Monetary Fund has prophecied the fall of America. China will rule by 2016, five years from now. America will finally become the failed third world country liberals have always wanted. The elite will remain elite, in unparalleled wealth, but the American population will have been “equalized,” or, deeply downgraded. The white oedipal liberal Communists will have won the war of values.



America is indeed suffering a collision of values. It is not a natural process. It is the stupendous effort of America’s traitorous enemies. It is agonizing. The country’s Puritan history is facing the challenge of change, and it feels terribly wrong to all true Americans. Modern “liberal” values seem immoral in comparison to the original values of the nation. Must the contrast be so violent? Is there any middle ground?





Nathaniel Hawthorne (1804-1864)



The Puritan way involved a self-discipline that is incomprehensible to most modern Americans–so enslaved to self-indulgent, push-button pleasures and permanent entitlements. Yet, the Puritan way was fast disappearing even in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s day (1804-1864). He tried to depict the writhings of that contrast in The Scarlet Letter (1850), and in nearly all his other works, novel or short story. Change from the Purtian moral way meant living a new, immoral way. For those pained by such “progress,” the only solace was a vague, torturous ambiguity, or a sustained, conscious uncertainty, for which disposition Hawthorne as well as Herman Melville and other early 19th century authors were so famous. They groped for a middle ground as the adolescent society progressed from childhood clarity to the delusions of adulthood. They ended up “romanticizing” morality as some quaint notion of the past, “when times were better.”



Personal responsibility, the fundamental social moral of the Puritan–the Judeo-Christian morality of the American culture, was later called “capitalism.” This is somewhat unfortunate. The term is automatically juxtaposed with Communism. Capitalism is a economic term which meant you were basically free to make what you would out of your life. Morever, it was your responsibility to do so. America was a wide open opportunity to make something of yourself. If you did not, you were an immoral louse, a ne’er-do-well bum, and you were condemned by society for your lethargy and irresponsibility. You were a sinner and a fool.



Communism tempts all such leech-minded people with the thought that it is someone else’s responsibility to take care of them. This is childhood certainty gone socially retarded. Communism is a blank check for the elite tyrannists, that’s all. It is based on the reticence of the weak, the fearful, and the self-deceived to fend for themselves.



Modern liberal morality has it that it is wrong to be strong. It is immoral to be responsible, and arrogant to advocate independence. This is the clash of morality. Conservative (Puritan) morality says it’s wrong to be weak. The individual has a choice in the matter.



Now, the measure of material wealth, or “property” is, unfortunately, the standard of success of these competing moralities. Communism says all should have less (except for the elite tyrannists who rule in Communism); Puritanism says each individual has the responsibility to accomplish whatever he can. Some do better than others. Of course, laws had to be made to prevent those with colossal achievement from ruling mercilessly over those who didn’t do so well. That inequity right there is the open door to Communism, at least rhetorically. The rich inevitably abuse the poor. Communism pretends to counter that imbalance; but, in fact, Communism creates a worse imbalance. More people have less, fewer people have astoundingly more.



The lyiny black African Communist traitor in the White House is the emptomical example of the deceit of Communism. Americans suffer want, while the Negro in the White House parties 24/7, with great rigor and stunning expense. This is Communism. This is racism, as well. This is making white America pay for historical sins. There is no atonement. The cup of black indignation is bottomless.



But the truth of ideology is concrete. The end of deception is abundantly exposed. Materialism is not the basis of Puritanism, but personal responsibility for oneself. Materialism is the basis of Communism, and those who preach are elite tyrannists, willing to see masses have much less, while they themselves luxuriate publicly, and dramtically.



Puritanism never promised everyone a Cadillac. But Communism promises everyone a Volkswagen (like Hitler did). Are you more comfortable with a government-promised simple car, or a chance to get a Cadillac? The white oedipal liberals and their Negro minstrel want you to play it safe, by their rules. Don’t gamble. Don’t risk. You’re better off with four wheels that roll (if you can afford the gas), than some immature, irresponsible, immoral hope of a Cadillac.



Thus, modern liberal morality presents itself as more American, more conservative, and more Puritan than Puritanism. Modern liberal morality wants you to have less, to be happy with less (while the elite liberals have continually more). Liberals want you to be more humble, to have less hope for improvement, and to be satisfied with much lower standards–material and moral.



It’s an interesting ploy, and outrageous in its success. Liberals have made right seem wrong, and personal responsibility look like rebellion. Liberals make original American values seem immoral, selfish, and individualism seem satanic. To surrender to the Communist sway is made to look like a religious conversion. It is the image of Christ. Give up your arms, cast away the burden of responsibility. Be free! Absorb ye into Group think. Be part of something bigger that youself. Worship ye Humanity. Should be easy enough. You’re human.



Friday, July 27, 2012

Who's Telling You What to Think?

A very interesting book review from www.UCG.org  about media corruption from TV, movies, radio, and internet. This follows this post about being politically incorrect in the news. This follows this post about slanted news reporting.  This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read another very interesting book HERE!



Who's Telling You What to Think?






article by Jerold Aust





Some people accept the news they read in newspapers and watch on television as the gospel truth. Is such trust in our mass media justified? Do you really know who's telling you what to think-and why?



Consider for a moment what might happen if someone you knew who died in the 1950s or '60s, perhaps your mother or grandmother, suddenly came to life and sat down with you to watch some of today's evening television shows. What would she see? What would she think?



Imagine letting her take your favorite chair and handle the remote control. Since you probably receive TV programming from a cable or satellite company, listen to her shocked disbelief as she hears the profanity and crudity spew forth. Notice her face as she hears the actors and actresses blurt out vulgarities with an ease and indifference the likes of which she would have never heard only a few decades earlier.



You might well find yourself on the defensive, trying to explain why modern television programming so openly promotes casual sexual encounters, gratuitous violence and foul language. She might question why you would voluntarily allow such crudeness to enter the sanctity of your home. She might ask why you feel no sense of alarm at the filth and vulgarity you allow into your children's minds. She might urge you to "turn that trash off"-and she'd be right on the mark.



Spiral to depravity

Steve Allen, the longtime actor, comedian and songwriter who died in 2000, wrote thoughtfully and perceptively about the depraved vortex of television programming in his book Vulgarians at the Gate: Trash TV and Raunch Radio .



"There has always been a market for vulgarity and licentiousness," he observed, "but at present it is undeniable that motion pictures, theater, television, radio, the recording industry, and, to a lesser degree, journalism are enthusiastic participants in the general collapse of standards and behavior.



"Some people may find it hard to believe that television was a morally admirable medium as recently as the 1950s. With a few exceptions it was largely administered by gentlemen and ladies, and although it was, from the first, apparent that inferior cultural merchandise was likely to become quite popular, given the notorious imperfections of human nature itself, television programming in general at least consisted of fare that could be watched by the entire family . . . It is clear that the medium has changed . . . Corporate America, granting exceptions, has not only largely given up its former admirable participation in the maintenance of society's general sanity but has joined those who would undermine it . . ." (2001, pp. 32-34, emphasis added).



For those who believe in character and high moral standards, some obvious questions come to mind: Where have we gone wrong? Why have we gone wrong? What, if anything, can be done about our self-initiated spiral into media-induced depravity?



What messages are those who spoon-feed us through the media presuming to tell us? What do they want us to think?



Today's mass media-radio, television, movies, audio and video recordings, books, magazines, newspapers, the Internet-shape our perception of reality. But how accurate is that perception? Is it true? Sometimes media moguls would like us to believe that our perception-a perception they carefully craft and provide- is reality.



But it's important for us to differentiate between viewpoints that arise from standards that are healthy for us and based on a moral foundation and those that are rooted in amoral thinking. As the Bible cautions us in Proverbs 4:23Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life.



See All...: "Be careful how you think; your life is shaped by your thoughts" (Today's English Version).



Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Impact: Celebrity Single Parents

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about celebrity single parents. This follows this post about the high amount of crime in America. For a free magazine subscription or to get this book for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886-8632.


Impact: Celebrity Single Parents

Printer-friendly version


What does God say about having children outside of marriage and becoming a single parent on a whim?

In 2008, 17 girls at the same high school in Gloucester, Massachusetts, got pregnant around the same time. Some blamed it on a pact between the girls; others blamed it on the rising trend of celebrity single parents (Russell Goldman and Elisa Roupenian, "17 Pregnancies a 'Coincidence,' Says Teen," ABCNews.go.com, June 24, 2008). Whatever the motivation, the impact is extreme on the resulting babies and the fathers who now—married or not, job or not—bear the legal obligation to support the mother and child for years to come.
What does God say about having children outside of marriage and becoming a single parent on a whim?
God condemns sex outside of marriage in his law, whether adultery or premarital sex (Exodus 20:14; Galatians 5:19). He does this for our good and for the health of society. Strong, intact families help produce emotionally healthy and stable people.
Getting pregnant outside marriage by intent (or accident) is irresponsible and sinful. That new little life will have many struggles without the benefit of a mom and dad who are deeply in love, committed in marriage and anxiously awaiting his or her arrival to lovingly guide him or her through life.
Celebrity single parents have millions of dollars and a staff of nannies and assistants to help with the day-to-day realities of parenting. Entertainment magazines and websites are full of images of glamorous movie stars or other media idols having children out of wedlock or adopting cute babies from around the world. Their young lives seem ideal, but no one ever thinks of asking those children if they are really happy. Indeed, no amount of money can buy a happy family—which really comes through living according to laws God has laid down.
God expects us to behave responsibly and respectfully toward Him by obeying His law. In doing so, we will behave responsibly toward other people. Keep this in mind when sorting through the trends that surface in our society. If it breaks God's law, no matter how popular it might be, it's still wrong.

Related Content

The Perfect Support System