Showing posts with label #rinos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #rinos. Show all posts

Friday, April 24, 2015

Five Flakes: The Treasonous GOP Senators Voting For Lynch—And Amnesty

A timely post about from www.vdare.com about the GOP who voted for Lynch. This follows this post about immigration and environmentalism.
You can follow me here.

Five Flakes: The Treasonous GOP Senators Voting For Lynch—And Amnesty

WPTV_LORETTA_LYNCH_1415377305726_9484723_ver1.0_640_480[1]
AG Nominee Lynch is not the real problem. The problem is the collection of Flakes in the GOP leadership.
It appears the GOP Congressional Leadership has finally caved on Loretta Lynch. The party bosses have resolved a dispute over abortion holding up a human trafficking bill that was being used to delay a vote on Lynch. After being accused of being opposed to “women” for the last few weeks, Senate Majority Mitch McConnell has reportedly cracked (again) and will now allow a confirmation vote [Senate reaches deal to vote on AG nominee Loretta Lynch, by Alexander Bolton, The Hill, April 21, 2015].
But the responsibility doesn’t lie solely with McConnell. Even though Lynch’s record on race is exactly what one would expect from Eric Holder’s hand-picked successor and she will continue Obama’s unlawful Amnesty, several Republican Senators have already declared they will vote for Loretta Lynch. And as you might expect, the same Senators who won’t vote against Lynch are the same Senators who won’t do anything about Amnesty.
The five openly declared Lynch supporters in the Republican Party include:
  • Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.
Graham may be running for President but despite that, he is still openly defending Amnesty [Lindsey Graham on 2016, Immigration and Israel, by Beth Reinhard, Wall Street Journal, April 20, 2015]. A Gang of Eight co-sponsor, it’s not surprising he is eager to support Lynch. Graham’s strategy to confront Obama’s unilateral Amnesty was to fully fund it and leave it to the courts figure it out [Sen. Lindsey Graham is the White House’s favorite Republican for funding Amnesty, by Conn Carroll, Townhall, February 23, 2015].
Graham made his priorities quite clear during Lynch’s confirmation hearings. While America’s Senator, Jeff Sessions grilled Lynch on her willingness to back Obama’s executive Amnesty orders, Graham led a line of questioning about… online gambling, which his megabillionaire backer and casino mogul Sheldon Adelson strongly opposes. (Adelson, needless to say, also supports Amnesty.)
  • Illinois Senator Mark Kirk
Kirk is a member of the liberal “Main Street Republicans” group and has a poor record on immigration, with a lifetime C rating from NumbersUSA. Kirk claimed to oppose Obama’s executive Amnesty—but only because it robbed Republicans of a chance to pass a “bipartisan” bill doing more or less the same thing. He then voted to fund it anyway [Sen. Mark Kirk: Opposed Obama’s Amnesty before voting for it, Numbers USA, January 22, 2015]
  • Utah Senator Orrin Hatch
Incredibly, Hatch says that he is supporting Lynch because the Justice Department “needs new leadership” [Hatch Moves to Support Lynch, Hatch Senate Website, Accessed April 21, 2015]. This is par for the course for Hatch, who has a record of announcing support for far-Left Democrats and then acting surprised when they predictably attack Republicans. “I start with the premise that the president deserves the benefit of the doubt. I don’t think politics should be played with the attorney general,” he told The Hill in 2009. Just as Hatch is now supporting Lynch, he supported Eric Holder in the interest of “comity,” even though Holder’s future anti-White activities as Attorney General were easy to predict.
Not surprisingly, Hatch, who has a C lifetime rating from Numbers USA, also claimed to oppose Obama’s unilateral Amnesty before voting to support it [Sen. Orrin Hatch: Opposed Obama’s Amnesty Before Voting for it, Numbers USA, January 19, 2015].
  • Arizona Senator Jeff Flake
The appropriately-named Jeff Flake is a long-standing immigration enthusiast back to when he was co-sponsoring legislation alongside Luis Gutierrez in order to bring in more immigrants. Not long ago, there were even suspicions that he was preparing to switch parties. A member of the Gang of Eight, Flake muttered some dissent about the legality of Obama’s unilateral Amnesty, before voting in support of it [Sen: Jeff Flake: Opposed Obama’s Amnesty before voting for it, Numbers USA, January 12, 2015]
  • Maine Senator Susan Collins
Susan Collins said she found Lynch to be “very impressive and I think she deserves to be confirmed.” Of course, Collins also tried to frame this as a way to get rid of Holder more quickly [Lynch nomination to replace Holder coming up in Senate next week, by Kathleen Hunter, Bloomberg, March 10, 2015].
But Collins also voted to end debate on the Gang of Eight’s Amnesty bill in 2013, which helped push the bill toward passage. She did rhetorically condemn Obama’s unilateral Amnesty because it “is undermining our constitutional separation of powers.” However, when the time came to vote in support of Ted Cruz’s point of order which would have opposed Obama’s action on constitutional grounds, Collins voted against Cruz and in support of Obama. Senator Collins has a lifetime C- record according to Numbers USA, and she’s getting worse with each passing year.
What’s particularly disgusting about all of this is that even “respectable” conservatives have plenty of cover. The Heritage Foundation says that the Senate must vote “No” especially “when a nominee supports actions that go beyond the executive’s constitutional authority,” as Lynch does. [“No” on the Confirmation of Loretta Lynch for Attorney General, Heritage Action for America, March 2, 2015]. Even National Review has editorialized against the Lynch nomination [Resist the Lynch nomination, National Review, January 29, 2015].
And the Main Stream Media has highlighted other important reasons to oppose Lynch becoming the Attorney General. U.S. News & World Report noted: “There are serious allegations that prosecutors in her office – the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York – made use of secret dockets, denied the victims of crime the opportunity to pursue restitution as required by federal law, and committed other abuses.” [Block Loretta Lynch’s Confirmation, by Peter Roff, February 5, 2015].
Lynch was also heavily implicated in the massive money -laundering scandal involving banking giant HSBC. As U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Lynch agreed to drop charges against HSBC officials in return for its paying a fine [HSBC Whistleblower spills Lynch Evidence To Senate, by Jerome Corsi, WND, February 18, 2015]. Testimony on all of this was presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Politically, it’s hard to see the downside of opposing an Obama nominee because she allegedly protected corrupt bankers.
But Lynch would be the country’s first black female Attorney General. Not many Republicans want to vote against that. Lynch also comes from a humble family background, which gives her a narrative that can be eagerly promoted if this battle is drawn out any further [After forging her path from N.C. to Brooklyn, Lynch is poised to become attorney general, by Sari Horwitz, Washington Post, January 26, 2015].
And while the MSM is largely shying away from her role in banking scandals, it celebrates how she helped prosecute the Lufthansa heist immortalized in the movie “Goodfellas” [Loretta Lynch Versus the Goodfellas, by James Oliphant, National Journal, December 12, 2014].
What all of this shows is how talk of a Republican “majority” is deeply misleading when it comes to immigration. While the Democrats remain utterly united and fanatically dedicated to the goal of importing more Third World immigrants, the GOP cannot keep its caucus on the same side even when it comes to voting against Eric Holder’s chosen heir in the very office that will be used to administer Obama’s unilateral Amnesty.
Instead of a two-party system, we really have a “one and a half” party system, where monolithic Democrats and a rump of the Republicans can always be counted on to go along with more immigration.
And Republicans are so intimidated of being regarded as “racist” or “sexist” that they insist on acting like gentlemen even as Democrats ceaselessly campaign against them as vile bigots.
The solution: either purge the Republican party of immigration supporters—or starting a new party altogether. But both of these ambitious goals share the same prerequisite—stopping immigration must be at the center of any reconstituted American Right. Anything less is just preparation for more failure.
After all, as the Lynch vote clearly shows, a “majority” composed of Flakes isn’t worth much of anything at all.
Email Thomas Martel.

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

America's War on God

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about about religious libery. This follows this post about Iran. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.


America's War on God




More evident than America's war on terror is a concerted effort to push God and His laws of morality out of the country's civic and personal life. Are you alert to the fight being waged? What side do you come down on?

Cracked American flag.
Source: Photo illustration by Shaun Venish/Thinkstock
The culture front has been filled with bad news recently. Recent polls show that some 55 percent of Americans now say they support same-sex marriage, the highest number since Gallup began polling on the issue in 1996, when 68 percent were opposed. America is clearly following the lead of many other Western nations, including Canada and the United Kingdom, where such marriages are already legalized.
In recent months judges have struck down state-approved bans on same-sex marriage in Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin and Virginia. Activists have filed lawsuits in all states with same-sex marriage bans, so this list will grow longer in the coming months, no doubt soon reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.
Earlier this year, "a narrowly divided Supreme Court upheld decidedly Christian prayers at the start of local council meeting . . . declaring them in line with long national traditions though the country has grown more religiously diverse" (Associated Press, May 6). This seems like a positive, until it's realized that the 5-4 decision could easily have gone the other way—and, with the appointment of more liberal justices, still could in the near future.

Drastic changes in society

Things have changed drastically in America since the Supreme Court outlawed prayer and Bible studies in public schools in the early 1960s and declared abortion legal in 1973. (Be sure to read "Silencing God's Children ".)
Over these same decades, morality has plummeted throughout the world and in the United States. Commentator Mychal Massie remarks: "They took away 'thou shalt not kill' and 'honor thy father and mother' and replaced it with school shootings, abortion and homosexual sensitivity. With God out of schools, school crime has increased 700 percent, but I'm sure that's just a coincidence" ("God, Not Crime, Barred From Schools," WND.com, August 4, 2014).
Yet the decline began earlier, often traced to the horrible aftereffects of the world wars of the 20th century—where the many millions slaughtered and attempted genocide led untold numbers of people to view life as cheap and as a godless scramble to do what you want while you can.
This year marks the 100th anniversary of World War I. In the wake of that epic conflict America, Canada and Britain devolved into the "new morality" of the Roaring Twenties. But it wasn't the war alone that led people to cast off their moorings. Other factors were already taking their toll.
Since the beginning of the 1900s, the United States and other Western nations saw the rise of progressivism, with politicians attempting to lead society gradually into utopian dreams of one-world socialism in which God is ultimately excluded. This was built in large part on the introduction in the 1800s of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and the social implications of minimizing or eliminating God's role as Creator and seeing man as just a more highly evolved animal—a philosophy of meaninglessness enabling liberation from Judeo-Christian morality.
Today the Western world is reaping what has been sown in rampant atheism, communism and immorality—with some trends and practices lowering us to depths not seen even in the debauched pagan societies of ancient times. The nations of the world are thumbing their noses at God—including America. Who would have thought that this country founded as a shining city on a hill would be projecting such godlessness today?

Overturning traditional values

In a new 2014 book titled God Less America (there is a faded B before "Less" on the cover), Fox News radio commentator Todd Starnes has compiled many recent news stories showing the attack on traditional values and the expulsion of God from public life in the nation today. It is an eye-opening and disheartening read.
After mentioning that well-known evangelical pastor Rick Warren told him that he thought religious liberty would become the civil rights issue of our generation, Starnes paints this disturbing panorama:
"Imagine the implications. Imagine what the future might look like for people of faith. Could it be that one day the pastor of the local First Baptist Church will be arrested for preaching hate? Could it be that one day police will turn hoses on little Christian boys and girls as they sing 'Jesus Loves Me' at vacation Bible school? Is it possible that Christian business owners could one day be forced to close down for refusing to violate the tenets of their faith?
"Will evangelical college students be denied entry into science and psychology programs because they believe in creationism? Will chaplains be thrown out of the armed forces if they pray in the name of Jesus? Will evangelical organizations be labeled domestic hate groups for defending the traditional definition of marriage?
"The perfect storm is brewing. The White House is waging an all-out assault on religious liberty. Public schools are indoctrinating our children with the gospel of secularism. Hollywood is spewing toxins into our homes. The soundtrack of our lives is a pulsating mix of sex and violence and filth. The American family is in ruins. What was once wrong is now right and what was once right is now wrong" (p. 3).
Alarmingly, some of these things are already happening. The awful fact is that a war is being waged against the Creator God in the public arena—and ultimately in the spirit realm and the minds of people. We must take warning in what is happening around us—and in our own affected thoughts and beliefs! Moreover, let us be among those "who sigh and cry over all the abominations" in the society around us, looking to God's deliverance when His judgment comes (compare Ezekiel:9:4-10)—for it will come.

Growing hostility toward Christian faith and morality

According to a 2012 survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, religious affiliation in America has dramatically dropped, especially among the young. In 1972, 7 percent of U.S. adults had no religious affiliation. As of 2012, the figure has almost tripled to one-fifth of the adult population—and 32 percent for adults under age 30 ("'Nones' on the Rise," PewForum.org, Oct. 9, 2012).
The Pew survey further showed that 73 percent of these people with no religious affiliation support gay marriage, and 72 percent of them support legalized abortion.
These changes go hand in hand with increased demands for overturning traditional morality. Former Arkansas governor and U.S. presidential candidate Mike Huckabee wrote in the forward of Starnes' book: "In recent years militant special interest groups have made it their goal to co-opt our religious liberties and force industry and government to go beyond tolerance of their views and demand full approval of them. Anyone who believes otherwise is told to shut up. We've become a society that obsesses over tolerance and acceptance of everyone—except God" (p. xi, emphasis added throughout).

600 examples of government hostility to religion

A joint report by two religious freedom groups, the Family Research Council and Liberty Institute, has documented "more than six hundred recent examples of religious hostility" (Starnes, p. 208). Some of these and others are noted in an article titled "Persecution of Christians on Rise—In U.S." on the WND.com (formerly WorldNetDaily) website (Michael Carl, Sept. 17, 2012). Here are several examples, as listed in the article:
" • A federal judge threatened 'incarceration' to a high school valedictorian unless she removed references to Jesus from her graduation speech.
" • City officials prohibited senior citizens from praying over their meals, listening to religious messages or singing gospel songs at a senior activities center.
" • A public school official physically lifted an elementary school student from his seat and reprimanded him in front of his classmates for praying over his lunch.
"• Following U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' policies, a federal government official sought to censor a pastor's prayer, eliminating references to Jesus, during a Memorial Day ceremony honoring veterans at a national cemetery . . .
"• The U.S. Department of Justice argued before the Supreme Court that the federal government can tell churches and synagogues which pastors and rabbis it can hire and fire . . .
"• Through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, the federal government is forcing religious organizations to provide insurance for birth control and abortion-inducing drugs in direct violation of their religious beliefs. [This has been halted for now by a recent Supreme Court ruling.]
"• The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs banned the mention of God from veterans' funerals, overriding the wishes of the deceased's families.
"• A federal judge held that prayers before a state House of Representatives could be to Allah but not to Jesus."
In the same article, American Center for Law and Justice senior counsel David French cites a particularly appalling example —"attempt[s] to ban any mention of God from historical markers, monuments or even museum exhibits . . . This represents an effort to whitewash God from American history and change our national identity."

Government vs. traditional religious values

A number of observers have cited examples of hostility to traditional American religious values by the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama. In April 2009, he put forward three nominees for U.S. ambassador to the Vatican who were pro-abortion—all of whom were not surprisingly rejected ( The Guardian, April 14, 2009).
In February 2011, he directed the Department of Justice to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act (in which same-sex marriage was not recognized by the federal government) against legal challenges. And in July 2011, he allowed homosexuals to serve openly in the military, ending restrictions that had been in place since the founding of the nation. Newsweek magazine showed him on its cover with a rainbow halo over his head and lauded him as "The First Gay President" (May 21, 2012).
Under the Obama administration, a Minnesota widow living in a government-funded apartment complex "was told she could not pray, read her Bible, or have private discussions of a religious nature in the commons area of the complex" (Starnes, p. 10).
In September 2011, the U.S. Army issued new guidelines for Walter Reed Hospital that read, "No religious items (i.e., Bibles, reading materials . . .) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit" (though the policy was rescinded after it was reported to the House of Representatives).
Furthermore, "two Baptist chaplains said they were forced out of a Veterans Affairs chaplain training program after they refused orders to stop quoting the Bible and stop praying in the name of Jesus" (Starnes, p. 152). (Read more in "Banning the Mention of God in Public Life ".)
Yet while government leaders attempt to push God and the Bible out, they welcome and finance alternative religion. The U.S. Air Force Academy in 2011 "dedicated an $80,000 outdoor worship center—a small Stonehenge-like circle of boulders with propane fire pit—high on a hill for the handful of current or future cadets whose religions fall under the broad category of 'Earth-based.' Those include pagans, Wiccans, druids, witches and followers of Native American faiths" ("Air Force Academy Adapts to Pagans, Druids, Witches and Wiccans," Los Angeles Times, Nov. 26, 2011).
The anti-Christian trend is not just in America. "A dispute over whether government can require Catholic schools to teach Wiccan and pagan rites as equal to the Ten Commandments and the resurrection of Jesus is heading to Canada's highest court" (Bob Unruh, "Christians Ordered to Teach Wiccan, Pagan Rites," WND, March 11, 2014).
Frighteningly, preferential treatment is now being given to Islam in numerous ways (see "'One Nation Under Allah? '").

Christian values now the lunatic fringe?

It's beyond disturbing how the great numbers of Americans still embracing the nation's traditional Christian values have been not merely marginalized but relegated to a lunatic fringe—by liberal activists, by the mainstream media and now by the U.S. military.
For an instance of the latter, "a group of Army officers was advised to monitor soldiers who belong to what were considered to be anti-gay, anti-Muslim, and anti-immigration organizations, according to a military e-mail. The e-mail was sent by a lieutenant colonel at Fort Campbell in Kentucky to three dozen subordinates, warning them to be on the lookout for any soldiers who might be members of 'domestic hate groups.'
"Among the groups the Army listed are well-respected organizations such as the Family Research Council, American Family Association, Atlas Shrugs, and the Federation for American Immigration Reform. The Army listed the groups alongside actual extremist and hate groups such as the Neo-Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, and other supremacist groups" (Starnes, pp. 140-141).
In April 2013, Pentagon officials met with Mikey Weinstein, president of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, and others of his organization to discuss a policy introduced in 2012 called "Air Force Culture, Air Force Standards," which requires "government neutrality regarding religion." The Family Research Council's president, Tony Perkins, asked the obvious question: "Why would military leadership be meeting with one of the most rabid atheists in America to discuss religious freedom in the military?" (quoted by Starnes, p. 150).
Weinstein said that U.S. troops who proselytize "are guilty of sedition and treason and should be punished . . . 'We would love to see hundreds of prosecutions to stop this outrage of fundamentalist religious persecution.' He compared the act of proselytizing to rape. 'It is a version of being spiritually raped, and you are being spiritually raped by fundamentalist Christian predators,' he told Fox News" (Starnes, pp. 149-150).
Weinstein claims thousands of Protestants among his organization's ranks and says they are only going after fundamentalists—of all faiths—stating: "As soon as we find a fundamentalist Muslim, atheist, Jewish person, or anybody else, we will be happy to fight them . . . but so far they have been few and far between" (pp. 151-152). Really?! Does he actually expect us to believe that Protestant Christian churches are chock full of fundamentalists while Muslim fundamentalists are rare? This is clearly dishonest.
Air Force Senior Master Sergeant Phillip Monk was fired when he could not agree that those who object to gay marriage in their thoughts are guilty of discrimination. Monk said that while homosexuals are coming out of the closet, "Christians have to go into the closet . . . We are being robbed of our dignity and respect. We can't be who we are" (quoted by Starnes, p. 157). (Read "Government and the Gay Agenda "). And this comes on top of many other societal wrongs (see "A Flood of Immorality ".)

Our place in the war

"In a recent foreign-language interview," reported WND chief editor Joseph Farah, "Roman Catholic Cardinal Raymond Burke, the head of the highest court at the Vatican, spoke the truth when he said Obama's policies 'have become progressively more hostile toward Christian civilization'" ("The Answer to Obama's War on Christianity," WND, Mar. 27, 2014).
Farah goes on to comment: "I believe Obama and the agenda he personifies have used abortion and homosexuality as battering rams against the Christian faith. For the proponent of unlimited government, God is truly the enemy because He is the author of liberty. He is the enemy because no one must serve a higher god than government. Men have been placing themselves in God's place, divining right from wrong, since the Garden of Eden. There's nothing new under the sun. It always leads to one end—disaster, catastrophe, death, destruction, misery, hopelessness.
"Obama can scarcely take all the blame for our arrival at this ungodly destination. Believers are more responsible. They let it happen. They continue to allow it to happen. They have the power to direct the nation in a reverse course—just as the children of ancient Israel had the power. It's still there for us today. All that is required is that believers follow the prescription God gave us in 2 Chronicles:7:14."
In this powerful verse, God assures us, "If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land."
So the answer is of course national repentance—a drastic change in our thinking and behavior to turn to our Creator and His laws. But that does not begin nationally. Each of us has been enlisted in the war against God individually—and each of us must repent personally.
This is by no means a new war. It goes back to Satan's initial rebellion against God—when he led a third of the angels in revolt. It continued in the Garden of Eden, when Satan as the serpent misled and corrupted the first human beings—taking captive God's precious creations to make a mockery of God.
Satan has done the same with America—a nation God has often blessed and protected—leading it repeatedly into the depths of depravity as part of his vile assault on God and His ways.
And he still does the same with all humanity. The confusion, the irrationality, the constant conflict, the mire of immorality—it is all under the deception and sway of the ruler of this world, the god of this age, Satan the devil (John:12:31; John:14:30; 2 Corinthians:4:4). All mankind has been in "the snare of the devil, having been taken captive by him to do his will" (2 Timothy:2:26).
So much of the bizarre political rhetoric we hear in the world is not the product of a sound mind, but is the manifestation of spiritual warfare—the screeching of demons fighting both one another and God through their unwitting proxies on the world stage.
And we must understand that we also have not been immune. God's Word says of all of us that "there is none righteous, no, not one . . . They have all turned aside" (Romans:3:10-12). It further assures us that "the mind-set of the flesh is hostile to God because it does not submit itself to God's law, for it is unable to do so" (Romans:8:7, Holman Christian Standard Bible).
We need a new mind from God to help us overcome the hostility toward Him that has become ingrained in our thinking—and thankfully God does provide us with the needed spiritual help when we repent!
Yet even with believers, Satan still strives to use us in his war against God. He can't destroy us outright, so he tempts us to corrupt ourselves. And what a shame it is when he succeeds in this, cackling with glee at his ability to capture the height of God's creative work and use it to mock God and His ways!
Let us never be among those of whom it is said: ". . . who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them" (Romans:1:32).
But if we have so fallen, the answer is still to humble ourselves in repentance—returning to God for His help and forgiveness. He will empower us to extricate ourselves from wrong ways to instead fight on His side—to be "a good soldier of Jesus Christ" (2 Timothy:2:3).
This is not a physical fight but a spiritual one, battling the evil spiritual forces around us (Ephesians:6:12)—and the wrong thoughts arising from our own carnal or fleshly nature: "For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ" (2 Corinthians:10:4-5).
In the war against God, there is no question about who will ultimately win. Almighty God will win. The question is, whose side of the war will we be fighting on? And will we endure?

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

DHS deadline: Tell Congress Not One Red Cent To Obama's Amnesty‏

An interesting article from www.alipac.us about the DHS deadline. This follows this post about DHS, Loretta Lynch, and impeachment. This follows this post on HOW amnesty is funded in ways other than the DHS. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.


DHS deadline: Tell Congress Not One Red Cent To Obama's Amnesty


Activists
Many of you have heard that Senator Mitch McConnell has already caved and surrendered to Obama and the Democrats on funding amnesty for illegals! We predicted this and were the first group in America to tell everyone that McConnell would bow because in truth McConnell serves the same masters as Obama and supports what Obama is doing on immigration.
We still have hope in the House thanks to brave members of Congress, many of whom are supported and encouraged through your support for ALIPAC.us.
Take fast action today to call Congress and raise your voice in anger!
Step 1: Call Mitch McConnell (202-224-2541) after reading this article here (click) about how he is facilitating Obama and the illegals. Let him really have it! Tell him you will never forget the lies, treachery, and support for Obama and illegal alien amnesty coming from Mitch McConnell!

Step 2: Call John Boehner (202-225-6205) and let him know that you know he supports the same kind of amnesty for illegals Obama does but you want him to stay strong and keep pretending to oppose Obama as best he can. Tell him "not one red cent more for the Obama administration."
Step 3: Call all Republicans in the US Senate, even the ones who say they oppose Amnesty and Obama's plan, and chastise every single Republican for "caving to Obama, facilitating Obama, agreeing to fund Obama's amnesty, supporting amnesty for illegals! Call them, raise your voice, accuse them, put them on the spot. Tell them "it is better to shut down the Department of Homeland Security than to have that agency violate our immigration laws and constitution by following unconstitutional amnesty orders from Obama!"
Senate Contact info link...
http://www.senate.gov/general/contac...nators_cfm.cfm

Step 4: Call all Republicans in the US House, (you can call Democrats too but every single one of them supports Obama's amnesty decrees) and tell the House GOP Reps to "Shut down DHS! Not one red cent for Obama! Stop this Dictatorship! Impeach Obama! Stop Amnesty!"
House contact info link....
http://www.house.gov/representatives/

TODAY IS THE FUNDING DEADLINE FOR DHS AND REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO CAVE IN. WE NEED A HUGE WAVE OF CALLS THAT ARE LOUD AND FIRM. CHASTISE ALL GOP SENATORS. TELL ALL GOP HOUSE REPS YOU SUPPORT THEM STANDING STRONG AGAINST OBAMA!

Let's roll, Americans!

William Gheen and The ALIPAC Teamwww.alipac.us
www.againstamnesty.com




Thursday, January 2, 2014

2014, New Year, Old Error

A timely post about from www.badeagle.com analyzing the current state of America. This follows this post  about the corruption in the Department of Homeland Security.This follows this post about Christmas in Mexico.  In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

2014, New Year, Old Error

by David Yeagley   3 Comments ·     
 

It is difficult for a realist to have a positive outlook for 2014, when obviously self-righteous fools are intentionally ruining the country, and having a wondrous delight in so doing. They crave a legacy of changing America, from the land of the free and home of the brave, to the land of the weak and ignorant dependents.
There is no solution. Politicians and government officials are bribed, and wholly undependable except for fraud, dissembling, and concession to naturally evolving tyranny.
The conglomerate of conservative talkers, the professional commentators, have had little or no effect whatever. Tea Party candidates have betrayed their trust as well. Republicans fear being blamed, as though they truly guilty. They are lost in rhetorical politics and reactionary manoeuvers.
Perhaps these are just the jaded views of one deep into chemotherapy treatment, passed six months now, since it all began. Perhaps I simply don’t have the energy to think so positively in the face of obvious demise–of the country, that is. I do believe America is over. What we were will never be again. The Democrat Communists and traitors, weak Republicans have seen to that.
And even though I always admired George W. Bush and his compassionate wife and strong daughters, I realize now that he was a rather horrible president. In fact, Bush opened all the doors through which “Barack Obama,” the resident president, has danced through in such arrogant ease: over-spending, reduced freedom, and international cooperation, or submission.

Former President George W. Bush, globalist.
How so? Fundamental globalism. The entire Bush clan is a purely globalist entity. This is the Communist path, really. And, as George Soros as said, America is the biggest obstacle to world peace. Same concept. If you excel, you disrupt equality. If you are great, you oppress those who aren’t. The idea that all are equal is mark of self-righteous political theorists, the most dangerous and tyrannical of their kind. George Soros understands all that. And certainly Hillary Clinton.
Are there any powers that would contest or challenge globalism successfully? No. Big business needs it. It’s all about cheap labor. The churches all revel in international mission programs. The market attracts globalism. Entertainment industries, ‘hospitality’ businesses all thrive on tourism, which is another aspect of internationalism.

George Soros, financial manipulator.
I just don’t see improvement. Indeed, my personal health disallows any too much enthusiasm. My lung capacity is no doubt forever reduced. Just breathing is a conscious challenge. Mesothelioma is a fast developing cancer, and only about 40% of patients survive one year; only 20% by the second year, and by the fourth year, less than 10% survive. I personally don’t think about these figures, as I have plenty else to think about. (Plus, I believe in miracles of healing, and a merciful God.)
I am genuinely sorry that America has passed. The great vision is now just some psychological “Indian reservation” in the collective consciousness of the populace. It will soon be relegated to the collective unconscious, no doubt. It is a tragedy, even if an inevitability. White conservatives are just out-numbered and out-gunned, just as the American Indians were.

Hillary Clinton, lying enemy of the state.
As an American Indian, I decry the demise most of all, more than even they who built the country. They took the land from Indians–who fought to the death to keep it. Now white liberals are giving it way to the most unworthy, and Indians don’t even have a chance to fight for it. This is one of the greatest ironies of all history.
So, let 2014 be a year of passing, of quick passing. If there is no 2nd Revolution, then we shall all need to quickly submit to the tyrannies ahead, and make as little fuss about it as possible, lest we be bigger fools than the they which brought on the demise. All our loud talk about guns and freedom is just noble-sounding noise. The tyrannists have won already. They knew how to take advantage of the weak, ignorant, and greedy.

David Yeagley, great, great grandson of Bad Eagle.
- See more at: http://www.badeagle.com/2014/01/02/2014-new-year-old-error/#sthash.SjZvlHXV.dpuf

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Illegals camped out near Congress, 48 hour focus against amnesty

BLOGGERS NOTE: I WILL BE MOVING FROM FACEBOOK TO TWITTER AND BLOGSPOT SOON!


A very interesting post from www.Alipac.US about fighting against the current immigration surge. This follows this post about Barack Obama and “Faith Leaders” attempting to pass immigration amnesty.. REMEMBER, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws!This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.

Day 2: Illegals camped out near Congress, 48 hour focus against amnesty


by

ALIPAC   Illegal immigration fighters,

We have found that the illegal alien invasion supporters are dominating here in Washington, DC! While your calls are helping our ground game lobbying against amnesty, we must get a better response from our activists over the next critical 48 hours!

We are not releasing the names of members of Congress we are meeting with for strategic reasons, but one office thanked us today and said it was great to hear from someone on their side because they have had so many amnesty lobbyists coming in their doors!

And you can see from these pictures taken on the National Mall illegal aliens conducting a "Fast for Families" have some very expensive gear and tents combined with elite access to camp out near the very steps of our American Congress!

Illegal alien Fasting for Families expensive outpost set up on the National Mall


http://www.alipac.us/f9/illegal-alien-fasting-families-expensive-outpost-set-up-national-mall-near-292412/

Today we need you to use both the power of praise and the power of criticism. We need you to contact the next list of 25 members of Congress who are standing strong against amnesty for illegal aliens. They need to hear from you and you need to let them know you will support them if they continue to tell the big money power players "No On Amnesty."



Thanks to surging sign ups on our Petition Against Amnesty found at www.AgainstAmnesty.com we have many new supporters receiving this email alert who can help us have more power in DC!

Please start by praising the following 25 members of Congress, then click on the link below to go after the 35 Republicans trying to help Obama pass amnesty and inform them you will be working with groups like ALIPAC to take them out of office in the GOP primaries of 2014!






Step 1: The Power of Praise--Call the good guys and gals and thank them for saying no to Amnesty:



"I'm calling/writing to thank Representative _____ for standing up against the immigration reform amnesty that more than 60% of Americans oppose. We need our Republicans in Congress focused on holding Obama accountable for his misdeeds instead of trying to help Obama pass amnesty for illegal aliens that will prevent us from ever securing our borders in the future. Tell Representative_______ that as long as he/she continues to oppose Obama and Boehner's immigration amnesty plans, I will support him!"



Rep. Charles Boustany, Jr. (R-LA) 202-225-2031

Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) 202-225-4901

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) 202-225-4801

Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) 202-225-4101

Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) 202-225-5015

Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) 202-225-7772

Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) 202-225-1986

Rep. John Campbell (R-CA) 202-225-5611

Rep. Howard Coble (R-NC) 202-225-3065

Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) 202-225-6165

Rep. Rick Crawford (R-AR) 202-225-4076

Rep. Ander Crenshaw (R-FL) 202-225-2501

Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) 202-225-2571

Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA) 202-225-6411

Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-TN) 202-225-6831

Rep. John Duncan Jr. (R-TN) 202-225-5435

Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) 202-225-2777

Rep. Randy Forbes (R-VA) 202-225-6365

Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE) 202-225-4806

Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) 202-225-4576

Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ) 202-225-5034

Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) 202-225-4465

Rep. Jim Gerlach (R-PA) 202-225-4315

Rep. Bob Gibbs (R-OH) 202-225-6265

Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) 202-225-2931




Step 2: Go after the GOP Traitor list to tell them "I'm going to work to remove Representative ______ from office in 2014 for supporting Obama's illegal alien amnesty plans!"



Traitor list with contact info and proof of amnesty stance

http://www.alipac.us/f8/traitor-list-contact-info-proof-amnesty-stance-289229/

Let's light up these phone lines in DC today while ALIPAC activists lobby lawmakers face to face on your behalf!


Let's roll, Americans!

William Gheen and The ALIPAC Team

www.alipac.us

www.AgainstAmnesty.com


Friday, November 8, 2013

Chris Christie Boycotted Cuccinelli, Campaigns for Graham‏

BLOGGERS NOTE: I WILL BE MOVING FROM FACEBOOK TO TWITTER AND BLOGSPOT SOON!
A timely post about www.westernpac.org about Chris Christie becoming the establishment Republican candidate. This follows this post about racial testing. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.


Dear Patriot,



Newly re-elected New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, previously the surrogate of Mitt Romney in 2012, has taken up the standard of Lindsey Graham in South Carolina. Of course, weeks ago, Christie was asked to appear at a campaign rally with Virginia gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli, but Christie refused. He was worried about his brand.



Ken Cuccinelli was outspent by his Democratic opponent, but he barely lost. With a little more effort, and a little more funding by the GOP, the Republican Party might have held the governor's office in Virginia. Instead, because Ken Cuccinelli was linked to the Tea Party, the GOP let him languish while Democrats pounded the airwaves with attack ads. Chris Christie could have gone down to Virginia and helped out, but he was worried about his brand and being associated with a Tea Party Republican.



What brand is this that Chris Christie has to protect? It's the type of brand pushed by Mitt Romney and Michael Bloomberg, the Republicanism that tells you you have to buy private insurance covering procedures you don't need, the kind of ideology that says the government can regulate the size of your soda, and it's completely inimical to conservatism. It's the kind of cognitive dissonance that says you shouldn't be able to choose a Big Gulp on the one hand, but it's perfectly OK for an employee of a small business to dress in a disruptive way.



That's why Chris Christie is traipsing down to South Carolina to campaign for Lindsey Graham: they're the same brand. They're for climate control, gun control, and the kind of control that says the government can surveil your private communications and interactions. That's not the brand South Carolina wants its Senator standing for, is it? It's not what you want, either.



This is what we're up against: a GOP establishment that would rather let Steve Lonegan and Ken Cuccinelli lose by a little than win, because their brand is antithetical to real conservatism. If the GOP establishment can't win on their own terms, they're fine with a Democrat winning instead. Why? Because the Democrat is closer to their brand.



Your donation helps us keep the fight going in South Carolina. It helps continue pounding Lindsey Graham, so that we can keep educating voters about his actual record. This is the race we're in, because it affords us and you the best chance of sending a message to the GOP establishment about their brand and where they can shove it. Donate today, and help us keep raising hell in South Carolina!


  Donate today!

Monday, October 21, 2013

Editorial: Primary the Moderates and Take the Senate!

BLOGGERS NOTE: I WILL BE MOVING FROM FACEBOOK TO TWITTER AND BLOGSPOT SOON!

Editorial

As you know, last week the GOP caved and gave the President ALL that he wanted. There were a few bright spots on the GOP side, and the fact that they stood up at all is worth mentioning. Nevertheless, moderate Republicans, sometimes called RINO's, need to be replaced while at the same time the Senate needs to be taken. Now is a good time to review the previous comments about this strategy HERE!!!

Friday, September 13, 2013

Is Purple the New Red in Texas Legislation?

A timely post about from www.EmpowerTexans.com about Texas lawmakers being a lot less conservative than the media portrays it. This follows this post about Eric Holder having the state of Texas in his crosshairs. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

Is Purple the New Red?


by Dustin Matocha
http://www.empowertexans.com/features/is-purple-the-new-red/
If Texas is such a red state, why was so much “purple” legislation passed this session? Perhaps it’s because so many Republicans in the Legislature voted so much like their Democratic counterparts, they forgot the color of the team they were on.

Professor Mark Jones, Chairman of the Department of Political Science at Rice University, offered his statistical analysis of the 83rd session in the Texas Tribune not too long ago, explaining what he described as “purple legislation” passing despite having such a “red state” mentality among voters in Texas.

Sadly, his analysis confirms what conservatives have felt all throughout the 83rd Legislature. Good conservative legislation was left in the parliamentary waste-basket, while “bi-partisan” legislation was pushed through.



This session, too many legislators were willing to go along with moderate establishment “leadership” than stand on conservative convictions.

Why? Because so many were willing to go along with moderate establishment “leadership” rather than stand on conservative convictions.

Despite having a near 2/3 majority in both chambers of the Legislature, it often felt like taxpayers could only rely on about 1/3 of the House (if that) to stand with principle, and only a handful of senators to do the same at any given time.

Some of the worst Republicans in fact voted more like Democrats than Republicans. Out of 95 Republicans in the House, 46 of them scored below a 60 on our Fiscal Responsibility Index. Reps. J.D. Sheffield (R – Gatesville) and John Zerwas (R – Simonton) were so bad, they literally scored worse than a Democrat!

In the Senate, 7 of 19 Republicans scored below a 60, with Sens. Bob Deuell (R – Greenville), Kel Seliger (R – Amarillo) and Robert Duncan (R – Lubbock) scoring worst than the top-rated Democrat.

Considering the fact that there are more Republican failures in the Legislature than Republicans scoring an 80 or above (38 to 34 respectively), it’s no wonder the Legislature produced such poor outcomes.

Here’s a list of all the Republicans below 60 on the Fiscal Responsibility Index. Taxpayers should study it closely between now and next March.

HOUSE

District Legislator Party 2013 Rating

56 Anderson, Charles

R 58.9

108 Branch, Dan

R 58.2

30 Morrison, Geanie

R 56.1

9 Paddie, Chris

R 55.5

47 Workman, Paul

R 52.9

150 Riddle, Debbie

R 52.9

55 Sheffield, Ralph

R 52.3

44 Kuempel, John

R 52.2

32 Hunter, Todd

R 51.0

133 Murphy, Jim

R 50.6

52 Gonzales, Larry

R 50.5

126 Harless, Patricia

R 50.2

127 Huberty, Dan

R 49.4

11 Clardy, Travis

R 49.3

58 Orr, Rob

R 49.1

57 Ashby, Trent

R 48.9

64 Crownover, Myra

R 48.7

114 Villalba, Jason

R 48.1

73 Miller, Doug

R 46.9

71 King, Susan

R 46.4

81 Lewis, Tryon

R 45.1

134 Davis, Sarah

R 44.7

8 Cook, Byron

R 42.0

87 Price, Four

R 41.6

115 Ratliff, Bennett

R 41.6

85 Stephenson, Phil

R 39.7

20 Farney, Marsha

R 39.6

122 Larson, Lyle

R 39.0

132 Callegari, William

R 39.0

88 King, Ken

R 38.6

21 Ritter, Allan

R 37.0

99 Geren, Charlie

R 37.0

94 Patrick, Diane

R 36.7

14 Raney, John

R 36.3

54 Aycock, Jimmie Don

R 36.2

72 Darby, Drew

R 35.7

18 Otto, John

R 35.5

60 Keffer, Jim

R 35.3

12 Kacal, Kyle

R 33.6

43 Lozano, J.M.

R 32.9

128 Smith, Wayne

R 31.4

10 Pitts, Jim

R 29.7

129 Davis, John

R 29.7

59 Sheffield, J.D.

R 27.5

28 Zerwas, John

R 25.3

SENATE

District Legislator Party 2013 Rating

4 Williams, Tommy

R 59.8

1 Eltife, Kevin

R 58.8

3 Nichols, Robert

R 58.7

24 Fraser, Troy

R 55.4

2 Deuell, Bob

R 53.1

31 Seliger, Kel

R 52.3

28 Duncan, Robert

R 48.8

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Texans Deserve to Know the True Cost of Illegal Immigration‏

An interesting post from www.morrisonreport.com about Texas legislators dealing with illegal immigration. This follows this post about the American Renaissance conference! This follows this post about banning driver's licenses for illegal immigrants in Washington State and this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso. On a related note, you can read about Miss Kentucky Latina here, an interesting article about Jessica Alba here or another article about Salma Hayek here. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

Texans Deserve to Know the True Cost of Illegal Immigration‏

Texans sent a message last November when we went to the polls, and
it was loud and clear: we want real conservatives who will take a
strong stand on the issues we care about. One of our biggest
concerns is illegal immigration, which is overwhelming our state.
Unfortunately it seems that Rep. Rob Eissler, chairman of the House
Public Education Committee, has already turned his back on our
concerns. He is opposed to a bill that would require public
schools to check the immigration status of their students. This is
not what we voted for in November. Please send a free fax to let
Rob Eissler know we're not going to put up with it.
http://www.morrisonreport.com/fax_test/index.php?faxID=97

Full report:

Last November, voters went to the polls across Texas and America
and sent an unmistakable message: we've had enough of "me too"
Republicans, and we want leaders who will do more than just mouth
platitudes that sound good. We want Republicans who will fight for
conservative causes and principles, instead of caving in and
kowtowing to liberals at the first sign of opposition. Some of our
senators and representatives in Austin have let us know that they
received the message loud and clear, and they're going to work hard
on behalf of the issues we care about, and there are indications
that this session won't just be business as usual. Unfortunately,
others seem to have completely forgotten the conservative
revolution of last November.

Rep. Debbie Riddle (R-Houston) has proposed a bill that would
require all public schools to check the immigration status of all
their students. This is a very sensible first step toward getting
a handle on the huge illegal immigration problem in Texas. As it
stands now, there are no reliable figures as to just how widespread
the problem is. If Debbie Riddle's bill becomes law, at least we
would finally be able to measure just how much it costs us every
year to educate the children of illegals in our public schools.
This is exactly the sort of leadership conservative Texans demanded
last November.

Unfortunately it seems that not all the Republicans in Austin got
the message. One of them, Rep. Rob Eissler (R-The Woodlands) is
Chairman of the House Public Education Committee. Recently he gave
an interview to the Texas Tribune in which he was asked about Rep.
Riddle's bill. His response to the question should anger every
conservative in Texas. At first he tried to avoid answering the
question. Then, not only did he say he opposes the bill, calling
it a mandate, he did so in a very condescending and offensive
manner. He gave the distinct impression that he wants nothing to
do with those of us who are concerned about illegal immigration,
and won't be doing anything to stop it.

Rep. Eissler pointed out that under Supreme Court rulings, public
schools in America have no choice but to educate the children of
illegals. Under current law, that is true, but Eissler is
misconstruing the point of the bill. There is nothing in it which
would order or allow schools to refuse admittance to the children
of illegal aliens. It would simply require them to verify
citizenship status, just as they already tabulate many other
statistics, such as how many children are below the poverty line,
what race children are, etc. Collecting one more bit of
information would hardly constitute a burden on public schools.

It seems likely that there is more to Eissler's opposition than the
fact that this bill would be an inexpensive mandate. Not only does
he appear to be opposed to efforts to rein in illegal immigration,
he also appears to want to use the very fact that schools are being
swamped by illegals as an excuse to raise spending on public
education. In January 2010, a Houston Chronicle article discussed
the fact that around 60% of students in Texas public schools are
considered "disadvantaged", because they come from a low income
family, or they don't speak English well, or both. Obviously, this
problem has been made much worse by illegal immigrants, many of
whose children fall into one or both categories. The Chronicle
quoted Eissler, who said the answer is spending more tax dollars to
hire teachers with "more qualifications" in our public schools:
"You have more and more kids that are less prepared to do well in
school. Where the expense comes in, you need teachers that have
more qualifications. Maybe we need more and better professional
development for our teachers." It's hard to understand "teachers
that have more qualifications" in this context as anything other
than "bilingual" teachers. Eissler admitted that his idea would
mean spending more money on public schools, which would also, quite
conveniently, give him even more power as Chairman of the House
Public Education Committee.

Rob Eissler's opposition to the Riddle bill is an outrage, and we
cannot allow it to pass unopposed. For far too long we've put up
with being betrayed by RINOs and phony conservatives, and it has to
stop. Liberals don't betray their base and start voting along
conservative lines when they win office. No, leftists are playing
to win, and they unashamedly represent the people who put them in
power. Just this past week, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor,
who famously said that she thinks a "wise Latina" would make a
better judge than a white male, spoke to a group of students at the
University of Chicago law school, and she made it clear she's
strongly committed to racial quotas and other preferences. She
knows who made her what she is today, and she intends to use her
power to advance their agenda. Meanwhile, on our side, we're
regularly betrayed by RINO after RINO.

Conservative Texans want leaders who will fight for what we believe
in, while there's still time to make a difference. California is
probably past the point of no return when it comes to being
destroyed by illegal immigration, but Texas isn't that far behind.
We must act now, or we will face the same fate that California now
faces, a future as a third world state. We can't let that happen
here. We need to inundate Rep. Eissler's office with faxes and
phone calls and insist that he support Debbie Riddle's bill. We
need to let him know that we're fed up with being betrayed by the
leadership in Austin when it comes to illegal immigration. He
needs to decide whose team he's on. If he's on our team, then he'd
better start acting like it. If he's not, and he'd rather win
praise from Democrats and the media for being "open minded" and
"tolerant," then we'll solve the problem once and for all in the
2012 primaries.

Take action:

Call or fax Rep. Rob Eissler and insist that he start voting like a
conservative when it comes to illegal immigration, beginning with
Rep. Riddle's bill to require public schools to verify the
immigration status of all students. Tell him he needs to start
opposing illegal immigration, or we'll find someone who will in
2012.

Main: (512) 463-0797
Fax: (512) 463-0898

Click the link below to send Rep. Eissler a fax for free:
http://www.morrisonreport.com/fax_test/index.php?faxID=97

The Peter Morrison Report
http://www.PeterMorrisonReport.com
http://www.facebook.com/morrisonreport

Sources:
http://www.texastribune.org/texas-education/public-education/eissler-dont-check-citizenship-status-of-students/
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6795211.html 
 
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704709304576124502622737210.html?mod=googlenews_wsj