Cheryl Bormann: Gitmo Defense Lawyer Wears Hijab, Demands Other Women Cover Up to Respect 9/11 Terrorists

A very interesting post from www.debbieschlussel.com about the terrorists in Guantanamo Bay demanding a Muslim dress code. This follows this post about a British diplomat being assauted.  This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and read a very interesting book HERE!

Cheryl Bormann: Gitmo Defense Lawyer Wears Hijab, Demands Other Women Cover Up to Respect 9/11 Terrorists


By Debbie Schlussel



I’d call her, “Al-Bitch.” But to be technical and use the language of the terrorists, Cheryl Bormann is a kalbeh [Arabic for dog] and a dhimmi.



In case you thought members of the legal profession couldn’t sink any lower, check out the photo, below, of Bormann, lawyer for one of the Islamic terrorists on trial at Guantanamo Bay for their roles in the 9/11 hijackings and mass murder of 3,000 Americans.  She represents Walid bin Attash, a Yemeni who ran Al-Qaeda terrorist training camps and researched flight simulators and timetables to help perpetrate the attacks.

















Cheryl Bormann: Clown Dhimmi of the Gitmo Bar



Cheryl Bormann, 52, who represents Walid bin Attash, said that her client had demanded she wear the clothing and insisted that other women at the hearing also wear ‘appropriate’ clothes out of respect for his religion.



More:



She further requested that the court order other women to follow that example so that the defendants do not have to avert their eyes “for fear of committing a sin under their faith.”











At a press conference Sunday at Guantanamo Bay, Bormann said she dresses in a hijab at “all times” when she meets with her client “out of respect” for his beliefs. . . .



Bormann, who is not Muslim, claimed the issue came up several years ago, when a paralegal wore “very short skirts” and it became a distraction for the defendants. She said that on Saturday, “somebody” was also dressed “in a way that was not in keeping with my client’s religious beliefs.”



“If because of someone’s religious beliefs, they can’t focus when somebody in the courtroom is dressed in a particular way, I feel it is incumbent upon myself as a counsel to point that out and ask for some consideration from the prosecution,” she said. “Suffice to say it was distracting to members of the accused.”



Yup, that’s Islam. The men can’t take it upon themselves to control their impulses. The women–even on American soil (and the U.S. Naval Base at Gitmo is, indeed, American soil)–must cover themselves completely up, lest someone’s hair or ear’s turn them on. In Islam, there is no personal responsibility and discipline, contrary to popular belief. Instead, it’s just women who “deserve to be raped” because they are “unwrapped meat,” as several prominent Muslim imams around the world have declared. And Ms. Bormann’s display is just more pandering to that backwards world that is quickly, rapidly expanding on U.S. soil beyond Gitmo.



Again, as I always say, the West v. Islam ain’t a clash of civilizations. Because that assumes that the latter is, in fact, a civilization.



The evidence proves otherwise. As do the silly, chutzpahdik pronouncements of this jihadist’s dhimmi lawyer-ette.