A timely post about from www.jihadwatch.org about Theresa May as the Prime Minister of the U.K. This follows this post about the U.S. House of Representatives and terrorism. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.You can follow me here.
Over at
Epic Times, I discuss the worst Prime Minister Great Britain could possibly have: its next one.
OPINION – The worst outcome of Britain’s unexpected vote
to leave the European Union was the resignation of David Cameron as
Prime Minister – not because he was a great leader (he wasn’t), but
because his successor is Theresa May, who promises to surpass even her
feckless predecessor and become the weakest, most appeasement-minded
Prime Minister since Neville Chamberlain.
As I was banned by Theresa May from entering Britain for the crime of correctly noting
that Islam has doctrines involving violence against unbelievers, I know
firsthand her anxiousness to please forces that do not regard free
speech and open debate as positives for society. But there is more. As
head of the UK Home Office, May announced a review of Britain’s Sharia
courts – then appointed Muslims to oversee it, drawing protests
from human rights activists concerned that her review board would be
too biased to note the courts’ violations of women’s rights.
Theresa May Has A History Of Oppression
May also disregarded warnings about security risks and scrapped an
aerial surveillance program that had been designed to stop migrants from
sneaking into Britain. With May heading the Home Office, the British government helped illegal immigrants quash convictions for fraud and other crimes, so that they could stay in the country.
May has claimed counterfactually that the Islamic State’s “actions have absolutely no basis in anything written in the Quran.” She asserted, in the teeth of abundant evidence (including a statement
from ISIS saying that jihad attacks would continue in France “as long
as they boast about their war against Islam”), that the November 2015
jihad massacre in Paris had “nothing to do with Islam.” This willful
ignorance hamstrings intelligence and law enforcement officials’ ability
to fight the jihadis: one cannot defeat an enemy while refusing to name
or understand it.
But May is on the case. With the jihad threat higher than ever, May vowed
to fight all forms of extremism, from “Islamist” to “neo-Nazi.” Does
Britain have a big neo-Nazi problem? Did neo-Nazis set off bombs on a
London bus and behead a British soldier in the street? Are goosesteppers
strutting around in Trafalgar Square? No. By “neo-Nazis,” May means
those people who dare to speak out against the immigration and national
security policies she has pursued that have brought Britain to the brink
of catastrophe.
As Prime Minister, she may get the chance to push Britain off the edge.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment