Michael Eric Dyson Responds: “I am in NO Way Advocating the Death of White Children”

A timely post about from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com about a call to murder white people in the U.S. This follows this post about the GOP leadership. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE!

Michael Eric Dyson Responds: “I am in NO Way Advocating the Death of White Children”


By Nicholas Stix

Re: “Tenured Black Supremacist Michael Eric Dyson: Blacks Must Murder Many More White Children, Before Whites Can Understand Racism!"   [N.S.: The following statement purports to be from Michael Eric Dyson. However, the statement to which Dyson is responding (July 18, 2013, at 11:55 AM) is not from the same post. I have no idea where the original comment is from, possibly youtube. I can’t guarantee that the statement came from Michael Eric Dyson, but it sounds like him, including the disingenuous denial of his earlier statement’s consequences.]





Michael Eric Dyson



Sir, that's NOT what I said at all. I am in NO way advocating the death oh white children. I'm saying that because white children have not been arbitrarily profiled and murdered by police and others, white Americans have no idea how infuriating, unjust and evil it is to witness your children be subject to racial profiling and murder. I am a nonviolent person who advocates peace. Please do not mishear my words or twist them into the belief that I think that white youth should die. The thought is absolutely wrong and evil. And perhaps I should make that position clearer as I speak. Thank you for writing.



Sent from my iPhone





On Jul 18, 2013, at 11:55 AM,



Dyson you were a thug and you are still a thug. You were a hustler and you are still a hustler, a race hustler.



You can't figure out that a person, any person, has the right to defend themselves, to prevent their being killed by a punk who had never performed one productive thing in his life, expelled from school, and who should have had a criminal record if police had did their sworn duty.



You calling for the death of White babies. If you were White you would be fired by PMSNBC and by Georgetown, but being black you are granted race privileges that others do not get.



Just don't mess with my children.



Sincerely,



THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2013 AT 12:58:00 PM EDT



Posted by Nicholas

WPIX News: Six NYPD Cops were in Racist Biker Gang That Brutally Attacked Driver Alexian Lien, and Terrorized His Family

A timely post about from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com about a biker gang of NYC minority off duty police who attacked a motorist. This follows this post about Mitch McConnel’s policies. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

WPIX News: Six NYPD Cops were in Racist Biker Gang That Brutally Attacked Driver Alexian Lien, and Terrorized His Family


By Nicholas Stix



I couldn’t find the story at the station’s Web site, but here’s its significance.



The cops who were present at the attack have reportedly claimed that they either didn’t know about the attack, or did, but didn’t want to intervene because they were afraid of blowing their cover, and the other bikers would discover they were cops. They’re lying. The truth is the opposite: Their fear wasn’t that the other criminal bikers would learn that they were cops, but that the other cops would learn that they were criminal bikers. That’s why they waited days before informing their superiors that they had been present—after they’d learned that their brass already knew.



Maybe nowadays, under diversity, associating with criminals will get a New York City cop a commendation and a promotion, but in the pre-diversity Dark Ages, it was a ticket back to civilian life.



A cop was not permitted to associate with criminals, except when “the job” required it, say, to arrest them or do undercover work. Part of a background check was to determine if one had such associations. If so, one didn’t get hired.



Every cop that rode with that gang should be fired and prosecuted.



As for whether the off-duty cops, none of whom was doing undercover work in the gang, participated in the beating of Lien, that doesn’t matter all that much, since the gang lurched from one crime to another.



Posted by Nicholas

Invisible Victims: White Males and the Crisis of Affirmative Action

A very interesting book review from http://www.amazon.com/ about the ways affirmative action hurts white males. This follows this post about current attempts to invade America. This follows this post  about a book analyzing some of America's current problems.  This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read another very interesting book HERE!



Invisible Victims: White Males and the Crisis of Affirmative Action



Frederic Lynch
 

5.0 out of 5 stars Affirmative Genocide
By Onyx

Format:HardcoverFrederick Lynch has done an excellent job of exposing the US Democratic party's betrayal of its's white electorate in enforcing Affirmative Discrimination without a mandate.

The lives of an entire generation of white American males were severly damaged by this evil and unjustified racial engineering program.Lynch goes on to ponder the seeming conspiracy of silence among the mass media and their refusal to highlight the plight of white male victims, even though there was no dearth of evidence.

However, as insidious as the the application of Affirmative Discrimination was in the US, it pales in comparison to what is currently being perpetrated in South Africa.For every white male job applicant in South Africa there are approximately twenty to fifty black applicants, yet it is the minority which legislation enforces discrimination against.The silence of the Western media on this matter(particularly the BBC)borders on the criminal.(The ANC controlled media does not deserve mention as it is merely a propaganda engine.)

Lynch details how American organisations applied an AA selection criteria which resulted in many meritous white applicants being arbritarily rejected.Instead of ensuring that all meritous applicants, regardless of race, be allowed an equal chance to compete, non-meritous black applicants were given preference over skilled white applicants - pure racial engineering. In South Africa the ANC uses demographic and occupational statistics in an attempt to justify its' heinous racial engineering agenda - this is not too different from the Nazis philosophy as expoused by Goebbels.During the Nazis invasion of Eastern Europe they were quick to identify those strategic political and economic positions which were held by Jews and to demand their removal and replacement with Nazis.This is the very same strategy being pursued by the racist ANC regime which demands that the majority of skilled positions available in the economy be occupied by blacks, and imposes substantial financial penalties, and refuses lucrative government tenders, to those organisations who fail to comply speedily enough.This effectively dooms an entire generation of young, white South African males to a future of poverty, regardless of their educational level.This is tantamount to ethnic cleansing and ethnic cleansing is Genocide. This, not crime, is the primary reason for the brain drain from South Africa as many white males would otherwise be reduced to the level of beggars.



While it is unlikely that any of the US Deomcratic party perpetrators will be brought to book, it is a neverending source of puzzlement to me that many white Americans continue to vote for a party which so blatantly sold them out.

Affirmative Action is a Gross Human Rights Violation and must be declared a Crime Against Humanity.

It goes without saying that its' victims should be paid substantial reparations for the economic, psychological and emotional trauma they suffered by having their basic human rights violated by Nazis style social engineering.



5.0 out of 5 stars discrimination to stop discrimination it still discrimination 

By Michael A. Scheurich

Format:Paperback
Amazon Verified PurchaseIts no secret why young American males are underachieving, although you would be hard pressed to find anyone who will admit the fact. Affirmative Action, meant to eliminate discrimination did just the opposite. It not only promoted discrimination against males it implemented laws and programs to make sure males were discriminated against. If a young American male was lucky enough to find an employer who would hire him he would have to work along side a non-English speaking alien who was less qualified to do the job and at the same wage level as his unqualified co-worker who couldn't even understand the instructions for doing the job. In addition the more qualified male was pigeon-holed while the unqualified co-worker received wage increases and promotions. How discouraging can it be to be in a job and knowing no matter how hard or how- good a job you did you were not going to be rewarded with pay increases or promotions and yet a person working with you who was not even an American citizen and could not even speak English would. In addition to racial discrimination males were discriminated against sexually during the same era and still are. Males are not just discriminated against in work but from the time they begin school up to and throughout most colleges and universities. At home parents were encouraged to discriminate against male children and 'daughters only day' in which daughters (not sons) would be taken to spend the day at work with a parent. Statistics given which demonstrated minorities and women were being discriminated against were manipulate to justify the discrimination against males. The jobs of women who worked lower paying temporary or part-time work to supplement family income was included in statistics comparing average wages of men and women as well as the lower starting wages of new employees which were compared to wages of men who had 20+ years of yearly wage increments. Men were no longer bread winners nor loving protectors of the family they were redefined in the most negative way possible as abusers of their spouses and their children. No one dared step forward to dispute these false claims less be terminated in place of employment or be accused of being a sexist or racist.



Government-imposed quotas were explicitly banned in the 1964 Civil Rights Act Nevertheless they immediately spread through the economy. For most of that time, they received eerily little media and even less academic attention. Of some 1,300 papers given at a recent American Sociological Association conference on Race and Ethnic Relations, the topic attracted only one.

The result: the situation summarized in the title of Lynch's new paperback,Invisible Victims: White males and the Crisis of Affirmative Action (Praeger, $14.95). The ideal of merit hiring has been subverted by politicized hiring, with white men unable to defend themselves against open discrimination. But quotas bring other problems, including conflict among the "protected classes'' they benefit, and growing racial polarization, particularly as the articulate middle class begins to suffer.



"Race-norming [adjusting test scores to produce racially proportionate results] alone affected millions of people,'' he says. "Many state and local governments did it with their GATBs [General Aptitude Test Batteries, taken by job seekers and supplied to potential employers]. And private testing agencies did it to protect their clients against lawsuits--they called it ''EEO-proofing.'' (The federalEqual Employment Opportunity Commission muscles business into quotas.)



But Lynch is not surprised at the blunder. "There's incredible denial,'' he says. He cites California Democratic Representative Don Edwards, a mouthpiece of the civil rights establishment, claiming on the New York Times Op Ed page that quotas did not exist--within weeks of three Supreme Court decisions about them. And, using similar Orwellian doublethink, supporters insisted that the 1991 Civil Rights Act did not impose quotas, although its key point was to override the Supreme Court and make work force racial imbalance prima facie evidence of employer discrimination.


5.0 out of 5 stars Academe & the Politics of Race and Gender
By townsend

Format:PaperbackThe word "quotas" is largely avoided, because public opinion polls found that 80% of the public opposed them. Instead, we hear of affirmative action (AA), equal opportunity employment, and the goal of diversity in higher education and the workforce. AA at work in the workforce, & reverse discrimination suits filed by white males, are well-known and occasional news items; likewise, instances of white males passed over for promotion are also known. But the insidious nature of race-and-gender preference as the determinative principle in academic hiring has not received the attention it deserves.



Lynch describes how affirmative action began as a series of directives designed to encourage recruitment of qualified minorities and women. Under this version, women and minority applicants would compete on a non-discriminatory, colorblind, and gender neutral basis. Today, a more radical version of AA exists, in which women and minorities are to be hired in proportion to their numbers in the general population. What was once a temporary, transitional expedient to redress inequalities has become a permanent, institutionalized feature of academic hiring practices.



Proponents of AA identify white males as the past perpetrators of discriminatory hiring and promotion practices. That present day white males might suffer loss from AA seems justified. But as Lynch notes, older white elite members imposed AA quotas upon white, working, middle class baby boomers and, to a growing degree, their children.



The generational cleavage between white male perpetrators of discrimination and present white male victims of AA has been ignored. Why should the latter group redress historical inequalities an earlier generation created?



The hypocrisy of the whole situation needs to be underscored. The very universities that accept gifted students into their graduate programs--including many white males--were the first to shut out white males when job opportunities arose.



Part of the American dream is that education is the key to unlimited opportunities. But just be sure to check your sex and skin color first.

Minnesota: Muslim workers going to EEOC to force more accommodations from H.J. Heinz Co.

A very interesting post from www.Jihadwatch.org  about Muslims in Minnesota demanding the EEOC give them more jobs. This follows this post about the Muslim element in the U.K. FLASH MOB Riots. This follows this post  about Miss USA 2010 and this article about the recent news about the former ban on offshore drilling which would encourage American energy independence and prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran   and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and read this very interesting book HERE!

Minnesota: Muslim workers going to EEOC to force more accommodations from H.J. Heinz Co.


Isn't it interesting how often these things happen in the Minneapolis area: it was at the Minneapolis/St.Paul International Airport that Muslim cab drivers tried a few years back to stop carrying passengers who had alcohol. It was in Minneapolis Target stores that Muslim cashiers refused to handle pork products. There have been other such incidents. And now this, which is yet another attempt to assert the primacy of Islamic laws and practices over American business practices and customs. Note also the involvement of Hamas-linked CAIR.



Heinz has bent over backward to accommodate these Muslim workers already: they have two prayer rooms. They just don't want them leaving work to pray outside of scheduled break times. Oh, the Islamophobia of it all!



"Heinz, Islamic workers headed to mediation," by Steve Alexander in the Star Tribune, August 9 (thanks to JSF):



The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will mediate a labor dispute between 22 Islamic workers and Dianne's Gourmet Desserts, a Le Center, Minn., subsidiary of H.J. Heinz Co.'s foodservice operations.

The Minnesota chapter of the [Hamas-linked] Council on American-Islamic Relations, based in Minneapolis, maintains that the Islamic workers were fired by the Le Center firm in December in a dispute over freedom to practice their religious beliefs, and were forcibly removed from the premises.



In a statement, Heinz called the council's statement "misleading." It said that allowances were made for Islamic workers to practice their faith and that "no Islamic employees were terminated from their jobs for requesting prayer accommodation and none were removed forcibly."...





Hamas-linked CAIR lying? Why, it's unprecedented!



The dispute allegedly revolves around whether Islamic employees were allowed to say prayers in the workplace at the time of day specified by their religion.

The council says that the Heinz subsidiary "created a new policy that abolished a break time used by Muslim employees to pray their evening prayer. The employees were prohibited from praying outside of the newly implemented work breaks, which did not coincide with prayer times."



Heinz said it is "strongly committed to recognizing and protecting religious diversity in the workplace," and that in Le Center it provided two prayer rooms for employees where the workers were "to take prayer breaks as a special accommodation to the requirements of their faith."...



Posted by Robert

How Race, Ethnicity Questions On Census Boost Anti-White Quotas

A very interesting post from www.VDare.com about the dangers in ignoring or misleading on the Census. This follows this post which describes something you can do if you want to protest the census after filling it out properly and this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso across from the recent Juarez shooting. For more interesting stories like this click here to follow this blog.

How Race, Ethnicity Questions On Census Boost Anti-White Quotas
By Steve Sailer
I’m always being asked why I study identity politics issues such as race, ethnicity, sex, and age.
The implication is that those aren’t appropriate topics for respectable discussion.
Yet the Census form that recently arrived in your mailbox shows that the U.S. government is quietly obsessed with those same questions.
The Constitution defines the decennial Census as an "enumeration"—i.e., a count of everybody. Therefore, the questionnaire is kept relatively short. (The Census Bureau asks more detailed questions on a vast variety of subjects on its monthly American Community Survey sample of 250,000.)
What questions are considered so critical to the government in 2010 that the Census has to ask them of every single resident?
Of the ten questions on the 2010 form, five are concerned with enumeration (for example, asking your name and phone number) and one with whether you own your home (with or without a mortgage). The other four deal with identity:
6. What is Person 1's sex?
7. What is Person 1's age and Date of Birth?
8. Is Person 1 of Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin?
9. What is Person 1's race?
In contrast, there are—of course—no questions asked about whether the resident is a citizen or is even in the country legally.
Personally, I believe that paying careful attention to what the state is doing is public-spirited. But it’s more fashionable to be studiedly naïve and ignorant about race. For example, liberal blogger Matthew Yglesias recently proclaimed:
"My guess is that in the future the vast majority of people descended from immigrants from Asia or Latin America will be seen as white."
Yet, why in the world would they want to be white when they win money and prizes from the government for being legally nonwhite? You get more of what you pay for. And the U.S. pays people to consider themselves non-white.
Thus, since the 1960s, all the movement has been away from being seen as white. For example, Indian immigrants used to be officially white. But South Asian businessmen successfully lobbied the Reagan Administration in 1982 to have Indians reclassified from Caucasian to Asian category so that they could get on the gravy train for low interest SBA minority development loans and minority preferences on government contracting.
When you stop and think about it, it’s bizarre that Indians, the highest income recent immigrant group, receives legal preference over native-born U.S. citizens from the U.S. government. But it’s considered in bad taste to suggest that Indians should give up their racial privileges.
The Census seems to furnishes a good time to think about how the government classifies people by race and ethnicity—abstruse-sounding questions that turn out to be hugely important.
By themselves, the ten Census questions only allow the government to determine:
The number who live in each political jurisdiction
Their race and ethnicity
Whether they own their homes
The first purpose follows directly from the Constitution, which mandates that Census results be to be used for redistricting every ten years.
One little-known oddity about the Census: illegal immigrants are currently counted the same as citizens in drawing up Congressional and legislative districts. Highly Hispanic districts thus tend to be "rotten boroughs" representing relatively few actual citizens a.k.a. voters, which makes a mockery of the Supreme Court’s principle of one-man-one-vote.
For example, in 2008, immigrant enthusiast Democrat Xavier Becerra won re-election in California’s 31st Congressional District, a heavily illegal immigrant part of Los Angeles County, in an election that saw only 111,000 votes cast. In contrast, in California’s 50th Congressional District in suburban north San Diego County, Republican Brian Bilbray won a race in which a total of 312,000 votes were cast. Each individual voter in Bilbray’s district counts for only 36% as much as an individual voter in Becerra’s district.
Britain reformed rotten boroughs during the Prime Ministership of the Duke of Wellington. But they are increasing in modern America, a direct result of our ongoing illegal immigration disaster.
Let’s turn to the government’s second purpose, finding out your Race and Ethnicity. These questions on the Census form provoke a little more public discussion. Hence, the Census Bureau’s official justification of its Race question claims:
"Race data are also used to assess fairness of employment practices, to monitor racial disparities in characteristics such as health and education and to plan and obtain funds for public services."
You may wonder what data have to do with "fairness of employment practices." After all, civil rights laws are usually justified as being about blacks not having to sit in the back of the bus, which you probably haven’t seen much of lately.
So how does anti-discrimination compliance get assessed by race data, anyway? Because, in reality, civil rights programs these days are mostly based on numbers—

Congress Asked To Use Census To Deport Illegal Aliens‏

A very interesting post from www.alipac.us about illegal immigrants being counted to skew the Census. This follows this post which explainst the importance of Patriotic American's need to fill out the census themselves and this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso across from the recent Juarez shooting. For more interesting stories like this click here to follow this blog.

Congress Asked To Use Census To Deport Illegal Aliens‏
ALIPAC is asking supporters to initiate tens of thousands of calls to Congressional offices asking for a new law that would allow US Census data to be used to detect, detain, and deport illegal immigrants who fill out the 2010 Census.
"Our Federal government has a Constitutional responsibility to enforce our existing immigration laws and those laws state that it is unlawful to encourage or assist an illegal alien to remain unlawfully in the US," said William Gheen. "Therefore, we are asking Congress to pass new legislation to block the Obama administration's current efforts, which are encouraging illegal aliens to use the American Census to steal more taxpayer resources and diminish representation for legal Americans."
Illegal immigrants are being targeted with taxpayer funded ads in Spanish encouraging them to fill out the Census, so they will get more taxpayer resources and have more political power. It is a felony for illegal aliens to register or vote in elections, thus counting illegal aliens and using their unlawful presence to assign more Congressional seats to states is theft of representation from lawful Americans.
"Multi-million dollar groups like La Raza want illegal aliens counted by the census because they want more political power," said William Gheen. "Americans will not stand for the theft of our nation and this corruption of our laws to the extent that millions of illegal aliens will gain 18 members of Congress, if fully counted and allowed to remain in the US!"
The average congressional district currently has 647,000 people in it using census data. It is estimated there are over 12 million illegal aliens in America. While the representation assigned to illegal aliens filling out the Census will be distributed around the nation, it could equal the power of 18 members of Congress!
If the current Comprehensive Immigration Reform Amnesty legislation in Washington passes, those illegal aliens would become voters giving them massive influence in possibly hundreds of congressional districts. "Each illegal alien counted by the census without deportation will take away taxpayer resource allocation and congressional representation from one legal American citizen," said William Gheen. "We want Congress to take action now to authorize and require the use of census data collected to identify illegal aliens, exclude them from the census count for tax resources and Congressional redistricting, and to detain and deport those found in violation of our immigration laws."
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC has over 30,000 national supporters who have played a key role in passing immigration enforcement legislation in over 30 states, while helping to stop Dream Act and Comprehensive Amnesty legislation in Washington over the last five years. For more information, please visit
www.ALIPAC.us ###

For your senator click here www.senate.gov
For your representative click here www.house.gov



Paid for by Americans for Legal Immigration AMERICANS FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION PAC
http://www.alipac.us
Post Office Box 30966,
Raleigh, NC
27622-0966
Tel: (919) 787-6009 Toll Free: (866) 703-0864

Republicans will lose many seats in Congress due to right-wing paranoia about the Census

A very, very important article from www.examiner.com about the Census which was previously commented on here. This follows this post about another reason to accurately fill out the census and this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso across from the recent Juarez shooting. For more interesting stories like this click here to follow this blog.

Republicans will lose many seats in Congress due to right-wing paranoia about the Census
DC SCOTUS Examiner
Hans Bader

Republicans will lose many seats in Congress due to right-wing paranoia about the Census and refusal to fill out census forms, gloats the liberal web site Daily Kos.
The number of Congressional districts a state gets is based on how many of its citizens return completed census forms. Because voters in conservative states are completing and returning census forms at lower rates than voters in liberal states, conservative states will lose many seats in the House of Representatives that they would otherwise gain due to increases in their population.
Republican-leaning "Red States" will also lose out on billions of dollars in federal funds, which are apportioned based largely on population.
Unlike many things the federal government does, the Census is expressly authorized by the explicit language of the Constitution. (As a believer in free markets, limited government, and the Constitution, I have criticized some of the legislation backed by the Obama Administration as being unconstitutional and beyond Congress's enumerated powers. But the Census and the questions it asks are perfectly constitutional, even though some of those questions may seem unnecessary).
A few white Census respondents are stupidly listing their race as "human" or "some other race" rather than white. Many commenters at the conservative website Free Republic say they will just refuse to report their race on their Census forms, viewing it as irrelevant.
This inaccurate reporting of racial information may unintentionally prolong racial set-aside programs that are obsolete and no longer necessary. By making the white percentage of the population appear smaller than it in fact is, such responses can make it easier for the federal government to get away with racial quotas, which are based on so-called disparity studies, which measure the supposed gap between racial percentages in the population and racial percentages in awards of government contracts. Under Supreme Court rulings like the 1987 Paradise decision, quotas are supposed to be used only as a "last resort" and for no longer than absolutely necessary. But faulty census data can give them a new lease on life, even when they serve no valid purpose, and enforce, rather than remedy, discrimination.

Can you game the Census form? PLEASE READ THIS!!

A very, very important article from http://isteve.blogspot.com about the Census which was previously commented on here. This follows this post about American's opinion on Obamacare and Amnesty on the heels of the recent BIASed attacks on Tea Party members. This follows this post the open flaunting of the lack of immigration enforcement and this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso across from the recent Juarez shooting. For more interesting stories like this click here to follow this blog.



Can you game the Census form?
Of the eight questions on the typical 2010 Census form, two are about ethnicity and race:
NOTE: Please answer BOTH Questions 7 and 8.7.
Is Person 1 Spanish/Hispanic/Latino?
Mark the "No" box if not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino.
_ No, not Spanish /Hispanic / Latino
_ Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano
_ Yes, Puerto Rican_ Yes, Cuban
_ Yes, other Spanish /Hispanic / Latino
— Print group.________________________
The Census Bureau's website helpfully explains:
Asked since 1970. The data collected in this question are needed by federal agencies to monitor compliance with anti-discrimination provisions, such as under the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act. State and local governments may use the data to help plan and administer bilingual programs for people of Hispanic origin.The next question is:
8. What is Person 1’s race?
Mark one or more races to indicate what this person considers himself/herself to be.
_ White
_ Black, African Am., or Negro
_ American Indian or Alaska Native — Print name of enrolled or principal tribe._________________________________
Asian Indian
_ Chinese
_ Filipino
_ Other Asian — Print race._________________________________
Japanese
_ Korean
_ Vietnamese
_ Native Hawaiian
_ Guamanian or Chamorro
_ Samoan
_ Other Pacific Islander — Print race._________________________________
Some other race — Print race.________________________________

The Census Bureau explains:
Asked since 1970. Race is key to implementing many federal laws and is needed to monitor compliance with the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act. State governments use the data to determine congressional, state and local voting districts. Race data are also used to assess fairness of employment practices, to monitor racial disparities in characteristics such as health and education and to plan and obtain funds for public services.Two general forms of resistance to these questions have been advocated:
1. Idealistic -- Answer "Human Race" or "American Race" or leave the questions blank.
2. Cynical -- Identify yourself as a member of a legally protected minority even if you are not, or your claim is far-fetched (e.g., "I'm African-American because my ancestors left Africa around 50,000 years ago") in the hopes of legally entitling you to affirmative action benefits.Please correct me if I'm wrong, but both attempts are likely to be counterproductive. In general, the people who benefit from disparate impact / affirmative action have spent a lot more time thinking about how to rig the system in their favor than you have about how to game it in yours. They've anticipated your every move.For example, during the 1990s, some individuals with parents of different races began a successful campaign to be allowed to check more than one race box on the Census form so that they wouldn't be forced to choose between their parents. The Census Bureau said okay to that, at which point, the race lobbies such as the NAACP went nuts because if the data was interpreted in a reasonable matter (e.g., assigning fractions based on how many boxes checked), then their quotas would be smaller. So, just before the 2000 Census, Bill Clinton announced that people could check more than one box, but only the non-white boxes would count for calculating the size of quotas and doing disparate impact calculations.
So, the organized pressure groups have thought about this a lot harder than you have.For example, if you are a non-Hispanic white person who fills in his race as "Human" or "American," you have merely made the burden the government imposes on your family members via disparate impact lawsuits worse.
My understanding is that Census-like numbers are sometimes used to calculate the denominators in the EEOC's Four-Fifths Rule calculations, but not the numerators.Just because you put down on the Census form that you are, say, "Guamanian or Chamorro" doesn't mean you will personally get the benefit of the "Guamanian or Chamorro" quota. There's no cybernetic connection between what you put down on the Census form and what shows up on your job application.If you put down "Guamanian or Chamorro" on your job application, eventually some bureaucrat will take a look at you and say, "No, you are not." It doesn't do you any good to whine, "Yes, but I put down Guamanian or Chamorro on my 2010 Census form, and if I got away with it there, why can't I get away with it here?"

However, because you checked "Guamanian or Chamorro" on your Census form, many "Guamanian or Chamorro" quotas will be larger. So, you and your relatives (assuming they are not Guamanian or Chamorro) lose.As far as I can tell, the best thing you can do for yourself and your loved ones is to answer these questions honestly.

If you are white and non-Hispanic, and you put that down on the Census form, then the quotas for protected groups will be smaller than if you try to be clever and put down something else.In a world of official and de facto disparate impact quotas, numbers count. And by diminishing the size of your group, you just make things worse for everybody in your group.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer