A timely post about from http://www.jihadwatch.org about the Mali attackers and their quiz on Islam and the Quran. This follows this post about U.S. governors refusing refugees. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.You can follow me here.

Mali: Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” take hostages, free those who can recite Qur’an

By Robert Spencer 68 Comments

We have seen this before on several occasions in Kenya. In September 2013 at Nairobi’s Westgate Mall, Muslims murdered people who couldn’t answer questions about Islam. In June 2014, Muslims murdered people who could not pass an Islam quiz. In November 2014, Muslims murdered 28 non-Muslims who couldn’t recite Qur’an verses. In April 2015, Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” stormed Garissa University College, and only shot those who couldn’t recite Qur’an.
Now we see it in Mali. And this is coming to the U.S.

“Gunmen attack luxury hotel in Mali capital, 170 taken hostage,” by Tiemoko Diallo, Reuters, November 20, 2015 (thanks to all who sent this in):

BAMAKO (Reuters) – Islamist gunmen stormed a luxury hotel packed with foreigners in Mali’s capital Bamako on Friday, taking 170 hostages in a former French colony that has been battling rebels allied with al Qaeda for several years.
A senior security source said some of the hostages had been freed after being made to recite verses from the Koran. The French newspaper Le Monde quoted the Malian security ministry as saying at least three hostages had been killed.
The raid on the Radisson Blu hotel, which lies just west of the city center near government ministries and diplomatic offices in the former French colony, comes a week after Islamic State militants killed 129 people in Paris.
The identity of the Bamako gunmen, or the group to which they belong, is not known.
Northern Mali was occupied by Islamist fighters, some with links to al Qaeda, for most of 2012. They were driven out by a French-led military operation, but sporadic violence has continued in Mali’s central belt on the southern reaches of the Sahara, and in Bamako.
The security source said as many as 10 gunmen had stormed the building, firing shots and shouting “Allahu Akbar”, or “God is great” in Arabic. The hotel’s head of security said two private security guards had been injured in the early stages of the attack, which began at 7 a.m. (0200 ET)….
In the wake of last week’s Paris attacks, an Islamic State militant in Syria told Reuters the organization viewed France’s military intervention in Mali as another reason to attack France and French interests.
“This is just the beginning. We also haven’t forgotten what happened in Mali,” said the non-Syrian fighter, who was contacted online by Reuters.
“The bitterness from Mali, the arrogance of the French, will not be forgotten at all.”

Daily Mail rejoices that female suicide bomber "never read the Qur'an"

Italy: Muslim pupils refuse to observe minute of silence for Paris victims

Saudi Arabia considers law against insulting Islam

A very interesting post from www.jihadwatch.org about freedom of speech being denied in Saudi Arabia. This follows this post about sharia enforcement in Saudi Arabia. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and read this very interesting book HERE!

Saudi Arabia considers law against insulting Islam


This is the kind of law that many in the mainstream media want to bring to the West, as well. "Saudi Arabia considers law against insulting Islam," from Reuters, July 15 (thanks to all who sent this in):



(Reuters) - Saudi Arabia is studying new regulations to criminalise insulting Islam, including in social media, and the law could carry heavy penalties, a Saudi paper said on Sunday.

The potential regulations come five months after a Saudi blogger and columnist Hamza Kashgari, 23, was arrested for tweeting comments deemed as insulting the Prophet Mohammad. Kashgari said there were things he liked and disliked about him.



"Within the next two months the Shura Council will reveal the outcome of study on the regulations to combat the criticism of the basic tenets of Islamic sharia," unnamed sources with knowledge of the matter told al-Watan, adding that there could be "severe punishments" for violators.



Criticism penalised under the law would include that of the Prophet, early Muslim figures and clerics, it said.



"The (regulations) are important at the present time because violations over social networks on the Internet have been observed in the past months," the sources said.



Saudi Arabia follows a strict version of Sunni Islamic law, referred to as Wahhabism. Blasphemy can be punishable by death.



A spokesman from the Shura Council, the governments all-appointed consultative body, did not respond to calls for comment.



Kashgari's case set off a debate in Saudi Arabia, a close US ally for decades and leading world oil exporter, on whether repentance could save convicts from the death penalty.



Kashgari fled the country in February, a few days after his twitter posts, but was later arrested by police in Malaysia en route to New Zealand....



Saudi analyst Jamal Khashoggi said the law required extensive public debate.



"I would rather have this law discussed by the public first. It should not only be debated by the Shura, it should be debated in newspapers first because it can be misused," Khashoggi said.



"I don't want anything to affect my freedom and we don't want Saudi Arabia to be another Iran."





What is it now?

Posted by Robert

Deport America's Muslims?

A very interesting post from www.badeagle com about this deportation proposal. This follows this post about Barack Obama's condemnation of Israel's self defense and this article about the recent news about offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more posts like this click here.

The Arab in Context
by David YeagleyShareThis
BadEagle.com has presented numerous pieces on the Arab, his history, his identity, and his personality. We have also noted his religion, and its deceitful nature, and the ire it takes to resist it.
Islam was invented by a madman, a murderous aspirant to world domination. “Mohammad,” son of ‘Abdullah (570-632) was relentless in purpose, and exotic in ambition–personal and national. The numerous tribes of Arabian people being perpetual and nasty rivals amongst themselves, with myriad gods and spirits, they would never amount to anything beyond the barren desert unless there was a way to unite them. That way Mohammad found–”religion” it was called, a religion that was based on the presumption of superiority, and the mandate to enslave all other people. This manic, satanic notion brought the Arab out of the desert, in all his paranoid and arrogant glory. He soon conquered most of the civilized world.
It was merely assumed that Arabs were the descendents of Ishmael, and thus Abraham. (See, Genesis 16: 7-12; 15; 25:12-18.) However, there was no evidence ever put forth. And no one contested the claim (except BadEagle.com, in 2006.) But even if Arabs are descendents of Ishmael, this brings them no honor or privilege. The word about him was simple enough: he would be numerous, but he would be averse to everyone, and everyone averse to him (Gen. 16:12).
Mohammad’s cult, the magic death cult, the Arab warrior society, certainly matched the Arab personality. It arrogantly insisted on superiority, and employed every possible means of deceit and cruelty. Persuasion or coercion, that was the non-Arab’s choice. Arabs preferred to use coercion, of course. Interestingly, the abusive mentality proved contagious, or infectious. Any ethnicity or race that came under the spell of Islam would manifest the same spirit. It is an extremely powerful and dangerous form of aggression, Islam.
It is also obvious, blatant, and rather stupid. Or, should we say, those who are fooled by it are stupid, or at least willing to be enslaved. Perhaps they are simply ignorant and indolent. This would be most tribesmen of the Third World, and those who have never known freedom, or flushing toilets.
In America, the Arab Muslim has achieved the wondrous status of unpredecented deception. He has risen to a plateau of affront which transcends that of even the Communist Democrat politician (who adores him so). People like Nihad Awad (Executive Director of the Council on American Islamic Relations) delight in artfully seducing the meaning of words. Indeed, they essentially rape the sanctity of the 1st Amendement of the United States Constitution. Hear for yourself. Here is a FoxNews video of Awad in the act.
Nihad Awad, Kimberly Guilfoyle, and Pamella Geller, beginning at 2:38. Awad begins at 4:01.
Nihad Awad, a complete alien, claims to represent America! This complete foreigner claims to have full understanding of America, and says that to build a mosque on the site of Ground Zero demonstrates “…what’s best about America…the freedom of religion, the freedom of diversity, and beauty of the United States…” He claimes that those who oppose the mosque (like Geller) “do not represent America, do not represent New York, or the beauty of what this country has been founded on, and the freedom of religion.” Awad claims that 9-11 had nothing to do with Islam!
Such is the perfection of Satanic delusion, in the face of America, in the name of freedom. Freedom to lie, and freedom to destroy. This is the freedom Nahid Awad lauds so elegantly. Note his cool, calm, collected superiority. These deceiving Arabs think as long as they can act so suave in public, in the media, they are superior. They feign pity for the poor Americans who are so angry and outraged by the murderous Muslims. Here is the epitome of deception. The Muslim tortures the victim, then claims to pity the screams he causes. Actually, he merely demeans them, scoffs at them, belittles them, and denigrates the suffering of his victims. That is the spirit of Islam, and the character of the Muslim–as displayed time and time again.
Ahmed Rehab, director of the Chicago CAIR (and regular contributer to alien Arianna Stassinopoulos Huffington’s news site), manifests the same egregious kind of condescension. It is repulsive to anyone who loves the truth, and who cherishes America and the historical values upon which it is based. These aliens know nothing of the American spirit, and merely manipulate words, superficially, to suit their traitorous, destructive purposes–and they enjoy great financial success and material luxury while they’re at it. Why, it’s the American way! Lie and get fame and fortune for it. Such a deceiver can actually become president of the country.
That special knack they have of acting so cool when they are being so piquantly offensive is a trait that makes them wholly vomitable. They disgrace even good manners, let alone the dignity of words. Their usurpation of social grace is ghastly. They are not animals. They are devils.
But, this is the final phase of the Arab presence in the world–the usurpation of language. They are in fact the zenith of liberalism. They are the spearhead of the Communist Democrat movement. Historically honed with centuries of cruelty and aggression behind them, these suit-and-tie puppets of Satanism are ready instruments. They fool only those who love to be fooled, who themselves are liars, and enjoy being raped. It is become a socio-psychopathology, this Islam bit. Obvious ill willed in the world, with murderous intent, they find a special haven of delight in the make-believe world of American freedom. Yes, to them, it is make-believe. They’re only playing a role, acting a part, and feigning a place–while they move in for the kill.
BadEagle.com has called for the deportation of Arab Muslims for some time. They should all be back in their own countries, and an international travel ban should be placed on all of them, for at least a decade. Deportation is the privilege and responsibility of every nation. Comes with the territory, indeed.
No disservice is done any Arab Muslim by deporting him. He has a country to go to–in which he is not persecuted. Why should he be anywhere else, except to colonize, coerce, and enslave others? I say get rid of him, quickly. He is a menace, a threat, and a curse to all except his own. Is that not the prophecy of his birth? Let him dwell amidst his own brethren.

Times Square jihadist considered several other targets

A very interesting post from www.jihadwatch.org about the Times Square bomber. This follows this post about Draw Muhammed Day, this post about the Ground Zero Mosque and this previous article about the recent news about offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more posts like this click here.


Times Square jihadist considered several other targets
Even though Shahzad settled on Times Square, to whom did the information on other targets go? "Times Square bomb suspect eyed other targets, official says," from CNN, May 18:
New York (CNN) -- The man accused of attempting to set off a car bomb in Times Square considered other targets in and around New York before the failed attack, an investigator said.
Faisal Shahzad, 30, pondered attacks on Rockefeller Center, Grand Central Terminal, the World Financial Center and Connecticut helicopter manufacturer Sikorsky, going so far as to case some of the targets, a senior counterterrorism official with oversight of the investigation said Tuesday.
Dressed in a gray sweatsuit, free of handcuffs, Shahzad appeared before a federal magistrate on Tuesday afternoon to hear the charges against him. As he walked into courtroom, Shahzad gave a slight smile to his public defender, Julia Gatto. At the end of the hearing, Gatto requested that Shahzad be served halal food -- prepared according to Islamic dietary laws -- while jailed.
That is: "Please go to extra trouble on the taxpayer dime to respectfully accommodate the belief system under whose orders (cf. Qur'an 9:5, for starters) my client tried to commit mass murder."
Of course, the politically correct dogma currently in force prevents most in the justice system from acknowledging that Islam has anything to do with jihadist terrorism. But, if for no other reason than fiscal responsibility: How about some Tofurky?
Posted by Mariso

Pakistan directs ISP's to block Facebook because of Draw Muhammed Day!!

A very interesting post from www.jihadwatch.org about Draw Muhammed Day. This follows this post about the Ground Zero Mosque and this previous article about the recent news about offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more posts like this click here.

Pakistan directs ISP's to block Facebook because of Motoon competition
Why draw Muhammad? Why make fun of the man Muslims revere most? Why arouse their ire?
Precisely because they react with murderous rage when one does this.
Now that may seem odd -- why would anyone want to provoke someone else's murderous rage?
Because it is an object lesson in pluralism. Either we put up with being offended by one another, or we enact speech codes that establish one group as beyond criticism. The latter road is the path to authoritarianism and tyranny. To respond to speech one considers offensive without threats and murder is a cardinal element of a society that respects all its citizens enough to allow them a voice in the public square, no matter how despised and hated their opinions may be. So free speech is a key element of any society in which all people are equal before the law.
And now when free speech is under serious attack both Stateside and internationally, and a key battlefield in the war against it is so-called "Islamophobia" and the Muhammad cartoons, it is essential to stand up and say that it is madness to threaten and kill over a cartoon drawing. And to stand for free speech whatever the risks.

Fear of Free Speech Alert: "ISPs directed to block Facebook's blasphemous link," from The News International, May 18 (thanks to Block Ness):
KARACHI: The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has directed the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to close a Facebook's link about the competition of the blasphemous caricatures.
A caricature competition is being held on May 20 at a link of the http://www.facebook.com/ under a plot to hurt the millions of Muslims around the world.
The PTA, taking notice of this attempt, has asked the ISPs to ensure the blockage of this particular link of the facebook website.

Also, on Facebook, this:
Fuck the organizers of draw Mohammed day. May they BURN IN HELL (INSHALLAH)
Your bodies will burn in fire in your graves and then in hell. We Muslims, can't even think of saying or doing the same for your Prophets because we respect that all Prophets were send by Allah Almighty. You should be ashamed of yourselves YOU BLOODY PIG EATERS.

Meanwhile, you can join in the fun Thursday here. And post your drawings to the SIOA page also.

Posted by Robert

Everybody Draw Mohammed Day

A very interesting post from http://biggovernment.com/ about the censorship that South Park is receiving. This follows this article reviewing a book about an earlier Muslim terrorist event, and this article about the recent news about offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence that follows this previous post about it.. This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more posts like this click here.

Everybody Draw Mohammed Day
by Andrew Mellon
Molly Norris has declared May 20th “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day,” in defense of Matt Stone and Trey Parker. All freedom-loving Americans should get behind this. While initially I thought it was an ironic joke that South Park was censoring everything related to Mohammed in their last episode, obviously we have seen over the last few days that against the creators’ will, Comedy Central cowered in the face of a thinly veiled Muslim threat.
In fact, submission, the definition of Islam, is the apt word to describe Comedy Central’s cowardice.
The bottom line is that the First Amendment guarantees free speech including criticism of all peoples. We are an equal opportunity offense country. To censor ourselves to avoid upsetting a certain group (in a cartoon no less) is un-American.
It is especially egregious because it represents dhimmitude. We are sacrificing our law and our heritage to Sharia. The law of our land is the Constitution and beyond that the natural law granted to us by our divine creator.
Giving in to Islam at the cultural level is the first step towards going the way of Europe. Just as with leftism, the loss of our values begins not with the politicians but with the public. We must stop this madness now and stand in solidarity against those who wish to destroy our way of life and replace it with theirs. You can try to bully Matt Stone and Trey Parker but you cannot bully a million red-blooded, liberty-loving Matt Stones and Trey Parkers.
Let me end by evoking the words of a great many South Park characters: “If you don’t like America, then you can git out.”

Saudis and Muhammad, their Prophet

Sex OK at 9, says Saudi cleric'Muhammad is model we follow. He took 'Aisha to be his wife when she was 6'

Posted: June 27, 200812:15 am Eastern© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Age, or lack thereof, is no hindrance to marriage under Islam, according to Ahmad Al-Mu'bi, an officiant for marriages from Saudi Arabia who says sex at 9 is fine.According to a video of the Saudi official recorded and translated by MEMRI, the Middle East Media Research Institute, Al-Mu'bi has confirmed that marriage contracts are appropriate for girls as young as age 1.And he said the model for marriage continues to be Muhammad, who married one of his wives when she was but 6.
The video comes from a broadcast on LBC Television on June 19, according to the MEMRI report.Al-Mu'bi said, "Marriage is actually two things: First we are talking about the marriage contract itself. This is one thing, while consummating the marriage – having sex with the wife for the first time – is another thing."There is no minimal age for entering marriage. You can have a marriage contract even with a 1-year-old girl, not to mention a girl of 9, 7, or 8. This is merely a contract [indicating] consent. The guardian in such a case must be the father, because the father's opinion is obligatory. Thus, the girl becomes a wife," he said. "But is the girl ready for sex or not? What is the appropriate age for having sex for the first time? This varies according to environment and traditions. In Yemen, girls are married off at 9, 10, 11, 8, or 13, while in other countries, they are married off at 16. Some countries have legislated laws forbidding having sex before the girl is 18," he said.
He confirmed, "The Prophet Muhammad is the model we follow. He took 'Aisha to be his wife when she was 6, but he had sex with her only when she was 9."An interviewer asked: "My question to you is whether the marriage of a 12-year-old boy to an 11-year-old girl is a logical marriage permitted by Islamic law.""If the guardian is the father... There are two different types of guardianship. If the guardian is the father, and he marries his daughter off to a man of appropriate standing, the marriage is obviously valid," said Al-Mu'bi."People find themselves in all kinds of circumstances. Take, for example, a man who has two, three, or four daughters. He does not have any wives, but he needs to go on a trip. Isn't it better to marry his daughter to a man who will protect and sustain her, and when she reaches the proper age, he will have sex with her? Who says all men are ferocious wolves?" Al-Mu'bi said.