Showing posts with label New Year's Resolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Year's Resolution. Show all posts

Sunday, January 4, 2015

Three Day Weekend Movie Rentals

Here are some interesting links from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed. Go ahead and click each year and make sure that you've seen these. This follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch!




Movies to Rent!!


Best of 2014.


Best of 2013.


Best of 2012.

Best of 2011.

Best of 2010.

Best of 2009.

Best of 2008.

Best of 2007.

Best of 2006.

Best of 2005.

Friday, January 4, 2013

New Research Explores the Changing Shape of Temptation

A very interesting post from  www.barna.org about struggles with temptation. This follows this post about the domestic policy of the president. This follows this post about alternatives to raising taxes for the Fiscal Cliff!  This follows this post about a race hoax at U.T. Austin.  This follows this post about Emmit Till. In the meantime, you can read a very interesting book HERE.

New Research Explores the Changing Shape of Temptation

http://www.barna.org/culture-articles/597-new-years-resolutions-temptations-and-americas-favorite-sins


January 4, 2013 – It’s that time again—the end of one year and the beginning of another—when people resolve to make some changes in their lives. New Year’s resolutions are certainly nothing new—in fact, for many people, they are the same year after year. Making and breaking resolutions is something of a tradition. A new study from the Barna Group examines the temptations Americans say they most commonly struggle with—and how they resolve to deal with these moral and ethical lures.



The research reveals some new—and not so new—aspects to the temptations facing today’s adults. The research was conducted in conjunction with a book project from Todd Hunter called Our Favorite Sins.







New Temptations

Resolutions relating to technology are becoming more common—particularly those that involve spending less time on it. The research shows nearly half of Americans (44%) say they are tempted to spend too much time with media, including the Internet, television and video games. Another “new” media-related temptation is to express anger or “go off” on someone by text or email. Overall, one out of nine Americans (11%) say they often or sometimes feel tempted to do this.



Though sexual sins are nothing new, viewing pornography online continues to escalate and take on new forms as the Internet and social media evolve. Nearly one in five Americans (18%) say they are tempted to view pornography or sexually inappropriate content online. Men more commonly admit being tempted to view porn than women (28% versus 8%).



It is not surprising the most technologically oriented generation—the Millennials, or Mosaics—are more likely than average to admit to struggling with these temptations of modern technology. More than half of Millennials (53%) say they are tempted to over-use screens and one-quarter (25%) feel the temptation to use technology to express their anger at others. When it comes to viewing pornography online, Millennials are significantly more likely than other generations to admit to wrestling with this temptation: more than one quarter (27%) say they are tempted by online pornography, while only 22% of Busters, 15% of Boomers and 8% of Elders say the same.







Old Temptations

Most temptations are not so modern. Americans are still facing the same age-old deadly sins that humanity’s always wrestled with. Though, naturally, the more serious the sin, the fewer people admit to being tempted by it. Which, perhaps explains why “eating too much” is up near the top of the list of admitted temptations—more than half (55%) say they are tempted to overeat. While doing something sexually inappropriate with someone is at the bottom—less than one in ten Americans (9%) admit to this. As might be expected, the older the person, the more likely they are to struggle with overeating (though this decreases from Boomers to Elders) and the younger the person, the more likely they are to face sexual temptations (21% of Millennials admit to being tempted to sin sexually with someone verses only 11% of Busters, 5% of Boomers and 3% of Elders).



When it comes to other more “traditional” sins, about one-third of Americans admit to spending too much money (35%), one-quarter say they are tempted to gossip or say mean things about others (26%), a similar number struggle with envy or jealousy (24%), a little more than one in ten admit to being tempted to lie or cheat (12%) and about the same number say they are tempted by alcohol or drugs (11%).



Though Millennials admit to being more tempted by these things than any other generation, the answers are fairly consistent across ages. The one exception being envy or jealousy, which Millennials are significantly more likely to admit to (41% verses 29% of Busters, 19% of Boomers and 15% of Elders). This is perhaps a life-stage factor as twentysomethings try to find their place and establish a lifestyle. Though it could also point to the effects of nearly ubiquitous consumer advertising on a generation that’s been marketed to more than any previous age group.







Particularly Western Temptations

While most people may or may not consider procrastination and anxiety to be especially sinful, they are the temptations Americans are most likely to admit struggling with. Three out of five (60%) Americans say they are tempted to worry or be anxious and the same number say procrastination or putting things off is a serious temptation for them. In a similar vein, 41% of Americans say they are tempted to be lazy and not work as hard as they should. As with most of the other temptations, Millennials are more likely to admit they wrestle with these productivity-related temptations and each older generation is less likely to say so. Interestingly, when it comes to these work-related temptations, Protestants are more likely than Catholics to say they struggle with these (57% of Protestants say procrastination is a temptation and 40% admit to being lazy verses 51% and 28% of Catholics, respectively).



Such angst regarding productivity may be a result of the Puritan work ethic or of a society driven by busyness and material success. Either way, they reveal the high value Americans place on work—and the anxiety surrounding it.







Why Do People Give In?

People give in to temptations for many reasons—but it would seem most people aren’t actually sure why they do so. Half of the respondents say they don’t know what the most common reason is they give in to temptation. Of those who could identify a reason, one in five (20%) say they give in to escape or get away from “real life” for a while. Other responses given were listed by less than one in ten, but included: to feel less pain or loneliness (8%), to satisfy people’s expectations of me (7%), to take a shortcut to success (2%), for personal pleasure or because “I enjoy it” (2%), or simply as a result of human or sinful nature (1%).







Is Resistance Futile?

When facing a temptation, remarkably, most Americans (59%) say they don’t do anything specific to avoid the tempting situation. As one demonstration of the changing values undergirding temptation, nearly half of Boomers and Elders say they try to avoid giving into temptation, but just one-third of Millennials and two-fifths of Busters attempt to resist temptation. However, those who are practicing Protestants and practicing Catholics stand in contrast to this trend: a majority of both groups indicate they attempt to stand up to temptation.



Those who try to avoid “giving in” implement a variety of coping mechanisms, from simply walking away to recalling Scripture to exercising. The most common way Americans say they avoid temptation is to pray and ask God for strength—about one in five of those who resist (18%) say this is what they usually do to hold back temptation.



Other common responses include using reason to weigh the options (12%), choosing to just say “no” (10%), and simply avoiding or staying away from the situation altogether (10%). Most of the ways people say they resist temptation are fairly individualistic—only 4% of people say they talk to or call someone else when they are tempted and a mere 1% say they seek the company of others or attend a meeting. In general, Americans seem to rely on their own willpower (through reasoning, leaving the situation, thinking about something else, or focusing on positive thoughts—about 4%-5% each) or on a distracting activity (exercise, work, going for a walk, listening to music, going to bed—about 2%-3% each).







Observations

David Kinnaman, president of Barna Group, directed the study and offered four observations on the findings:



First, morality in America is undergoing a shift. One example of that is how temptation has gone "virtual." It now shadows many of the digital domains of contemporary life. Nearly half of Americans admit to being tempted to use too much media and one in nine admit to expressing their anger digitally. For faith leaders, this shift underscores the importance of including technology and media as part of a broader discussion of spirituality and stewardship.



Second, Millennials are significantly more likely to admit to being lured by most of the temptations assessed in the research. Why is that? Given their stage of life, are they simply more likely to be confronted by tempting situations than are older generations? Or is it that younger adults are more comfortable admitting to them in the context of a survey? Perhaps the perceived social consequences of being honest about personal struggles are dropping—or it’s merely the angst of youth, worrying about things older adults simply no longer worry as much about. The bigger concern is if Millennials are beginning to accept these emotions as normal and not inherently wrong—as a result of media influence, normative peer behavior and shifting values. Whatever the case, a distinct moral perspective seems to be emerging among younger adults when compared to older generations. Millions of Millennials do not see temptation as something to be avoided, but rather a relatively benign feature of modern life.



Third, distinctly work-related vices top the list of Americans' temptations. As a society, are Americans really most concerned with procrastination and productivity? People seem to be more aware of (or willing to admit to) "sins" that actually make them look better—i.e., it's somewhat self-serving to admit procrastination or laziness because it reflects well on one's work ethic. But few people want to admit to being envious or mean or tempted sexually. But, of the list, productivity is not exactly the most biblical pursuit—that specific "temptation" is much more reflective of American values than of core biblical themes.



Finally, only 1% of Americans of any age are able to articulate that giving in to temptation might be caused by sin. Most Americans think of temptation more as a steady stream of highs and lows that must be navigated. This reveals a gap in biblical thought on the subject of temptation among the nation’s population.



About the Research

The OmniPoll(SM) included 1,021 online interviews conducted among a representative sample of adults over the age of 18 in each of the 50 United States. The sampling error for OmniPoll is plus or minus four percentage points, at the 95% confidence level.



This study used an online research panel called KnowledgePanel® based on probability sampling that covers both the online and offline populations in the U.S. The panel members are randomly recruited by telephone and by self-administered mail and web surveys. Households are provided with access to the Internet and hardware if needed. Unlike other Internet research that covers only individuals with Internet access who volunteer for research, this process uses a dual sampling frame that includes both listed and unlisted phone numbers, telephone and non-telephone households, and cell-phone-only households. The panel is not limited to current Web users or computer owners. All potential panelists are randomly selected to join the KnowledgePanel; unselected volunteers are not able to join.



Based upon U.S. Census data sources, regional and ethnic quotas were designed to ensure that the final group of adults interviewed reflected the distribution of adults nationwide and adequately represented the three primary ethnic groups within the U.S. (those groups which comprise at least 10% of the population: white, black, and Hispanic).



People are identified as having a practicing faith if they have attended a church service in the past month and say their religious faith is very important in their life.



Generations: Mosaics / Millennials are a generation born between 1984 through 2002; Busters, born between 1965 and 1983; Boomers were born between 1946 and 1964; and Elders were born in 1945 or earlier.



The research was commissioned by Thomas Nelson in associated with the launch of Todd Hunter’s book Our Favorite Sins.



About Barna Group

Barna Group (which includes its research division, the Barna Research Group) is a private, non-partisan, for-profit organization under the umbrella of the Issachar Companies. It conducts primary research, produces media resources pertaining to spiritual development, and facilitates the healthy spiritual growth of leaders, children, families and Christian ministries.



Located in Ventura, California, Barna Group has been conducting and analyzing primary research to understand cultural trends related to values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviors since 1984. If you would like to receive free e-mail notification of the release of each update on the latest research findings from Barna Group, you may subscribe to this free service at the Barna website (www.barna.org ). Additional research-based resources are also available through this website.





Wednesday, January 4, 2012

The Battle for Your Own Mind

An interesting article from www.ucg.org about the struggle a person can have controlling their own thoughts. This follw this post about the Gold Standard and buying gold.  For a free magazine subscription or to get this book for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886-8632.

The Battle for the Human Mind






article by Robert Dick





The first line of defense is knowing the enemy and his tactics. How can we guard our minds from the pervasive influence of secular humanism?



Throughout human history obedience to God has been a battlefield. The battles may change, but the war is always the same. Paul said it well in Ephesians:6:12For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places., "For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places."



Eve waged the first human battle, a battle over the credibility of God and the desire to have what did not belong to her (Genesis:3:1-6[1]Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?[2]And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:[3]But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.[4]And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:[5]For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.[6]And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.). Christ waged a battle following 40 days of fasting. The enemy desired one great victory above all others-that Christ would bow down and worship him (Matthew:4:8-11[8]Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;[9]And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.[10]Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.[11]Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him.). The enemy lost.



From Christ's day onward the Christian battlefield has primarily remained the same. The battle has been over the willingness to obey God while facing the potential loss of family, job and (in most centuries) one's own life (Luke:14:26-27[26]If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.[27]And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.; Matthew:10:35-39[35]For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.[36]And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.[37]He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.[38]And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.[39]He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.). The apostles and many early saints won the war, but lost their physical lives.



The most recent century has seen the battlefield change dramatically. During the 20th century rarely did a follower of God face loss of life as the consequence of putting God first in his life. Loss of family and friends was still a common consequence as was loss of job or vocation. Interestingly, in nations such as the United States even loss of job over obedience to God's way became less common during the last quarter of the century. There are still careers that cannot accommodate the Sabbath, but the incidence of job loss is considerably lower than in the early 1900s.



The spiritual battlefield, just as the world's physical battlefields, has changed dramatically during the last few decades. Consider a modern warship. Instead of bristling with guns as naval vessels have since the days of the Spanish galleon and the British man-of-war, today's modern warships are rather drab and uninteresting. But beneath that deceptively plain skin lies the ability in some cases to wipe out entire small nations with one complement of warheads.



No longer do armies line up in formal battle array as in the days of Napoleon. Battles are fought by radar- and laser-guided missiles with battle results reported by satellite cameras.



Where then is the modern spiritual battlefield?



The mind.



Just as physical warfare has become incredibly sophisticated, so has spiritual warfare. The battle of our day is the battle for the human mind.



Consider the words of Paul to the young evangelist Timothy. In 2 Timothy 3 Paul warned of perilous times in the last days. What was the peril of the last days to be-famine, plague, heavenly signs, the devastation of nuclear war? No. Paul listed 19 perils and all were attitudes and conduct produced by a spiritually disturbed mind.



It is possible that few of us stop to consider during the day's ingestion of radio and television programming, or even the reading of the daily newspaper or our favorite magazine, the number of times that out minds are assaulted by the thought-bending philosophies of our day. Whether we know it or not, this is the battlefield. In fact, our adversary is quite pleased when we don't realize it. Stealth is "in" even in the world of spiritual warfare.



For the sake of this article, let's consider one element of our spiritual battle-secular humanism.



One Battlefront: Secular Humanism



Humanism issued its original manifesto in 1933. It was a movement supported primarily by men and women in the field of education-those who shape the minds of our children and young adults. Forty years later, in the September/October 1973 issue of The Humanist, "Humanist Manifesto II" was published along with the names of the signatories. Updated and revised to meet the times, it took the place of the first "Humanist Manifesto." An editor's note currently appearing on the American Humanist Association Web site declares that thousands of additional names have been added to the original list of signatories.



Even more recently, "A Secular Humanist Declaration," published by the Council for Secular Humanism, put forth the position of this influential movement. Again consider that collectively "Humanist Manifesto I" (1933), "Humanist Manifesto II" (1973) and "A Secular Humanist Declaration" (1980) are endorsed by thousands of signatories. A review of the list of men and women who endorse these documents would reveal the names of educators who teach in the most renowned universities in the United States and abroad, well-known thinkers, famous authors, scientists and political leaders.



What is it that secular humanism espouses? What does it teach? Even more important is the question, What is produced in the minds of those influenced by its teachings and philosophies?



You will find a look at "A Secular Humanist Declaration" most revealing. Let me summarize the salient points contained within its 10 precepts. Consider as you read that the outlet for their philosophies are elementary, high school and college classrooms, television and radio programming, plots for movies and stage plays, newspaper and magazine content and government legislation, just to name a few.



The Teachings of Humanism



Below are the 10 tenets and an editorial summary of the points relevant to our battle.



1. Free Inquiry. It is considered tyranny over the mind of man for any ecclesiastical institution to shackle free thought. Religion should not interfere in man's right to think for himself.



2. Separation of Church and State. Religious oaths or prayers in public institutions, whether political or educational, should not be allowed.



3. The Ideal of Freedom. The document expresses that true freedom includes freedom from religious control.



4. Ethics Based on Critical Intelligence. This tenet shows a deep sensitivity toward God's interference in life. There are several battle lines drawn within this tenet. First, that the Greeks originated the field of moral ethics before religion entered this domain. Second, that people can be moral without God. Third, that we can live meaningful, wholesome lives without religious commandments.



5. Moral Education. Children should not be indoctrinated in a religious faith before they are mature enough to evaluate its merits.



6. Religious Skepticism. Traditional views of the existence of God are meaningless. The idea that God has miraculously intervened in human life is rejected. The literal interpretation of the Old and New Testament is rejected.



7. Reason. The document displays dislike for nonsecularists disagreeing with "reason" and "science."



8. Science and Technology. Adherents believe that science and technology are the most reliable ways to understand the world.



9. Evolution. This document deplores fundamentalist invasion of the classroom requiring that creationism be taught. The belief is that creationism, if allowed in the classroom, may seriously undermine the credibility of science.



10. Education. The document expresses concern that religious teachers go largely unchallenged in the media. The feeling is that secularism should be given greater programming exposure.



Preparing for Battle



Whether you consider it or not, whether you sensed it or not, whether you understand it or not, these philosophies lay siege to your mind, building up battlements from all directions-radio talk programs, TV programming, movies, television, even the daily newspaper. How do you combat it?



Obviously the first line of defense is knowing/identifying your enemy. How do you fight something you cannot perceive? Consider the tenets of the above declaration and keep your eyes open for its manifestations. Remember the words of 1 Peter:5:8-9[8]Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:[9]Whom resist stedfast in the faith, knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world., "Be of sober spirit, be on the alert. Your adversary, the devil, prowls about like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. But resist him, firm in your faith…" (NAS).



Watch, keep your eyes open, be vigilant, resist. Our battle requires that we take the approach admonished by Peter as we face the enemy in mental combat. Think about what you view. Ponder what you read. Where is it coming from? How does it want you to think? Is this the way God thinks? Guard the doorways of your mind.



Consider that the most powerful weapon in your arsenal is a sound knowledge of and a deep respect for God's Word. Stay close to God in study and meditation on His Word. Know it, think it, live it.



Paul was a man well aware of the world around him-a man who had been in the center of Jewish leadership before his conversion, a man well aware of the philosophies of his day. In his letter to the church at Corinth he urged them to be prepared for the battle for the mind. "Indeed, we live as human beings, but we do not wage war according to human standards; for the weapons of our warfare are not merely human, but they have divine power to destroy strongholds. We destroy arguments and every proud obstacle raised up against the knowledge of God, and we take every thought captive to obey Christ" (2 Corinthians:10:3-5[3]For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh:[4](For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;)[5]Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;, NRSV).



Consider the advice of Peter and Paul in the battle for the mind. UN

.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

While America Sleeps - Book Review

A very interesting book which describes the dangers from an unchecked reponse to immigration from what the author calls Reconquistadores and Jihadists along with the dumbing down of America's culture so that there will be no response to all of this.

You can get this from your library's Interlibrary loan department here http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/191079443&referer=brief_results and Amazon here http://www.amazon.com/While-America-Sleeps-Immigration-Indoctrination/dp/0595435246/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1239394673&sr=1-1

While America Sleeps






The authors table of contents says it all, and I have never seen a better more organized laydown of content than this one, so good that I am spelling it out here because for many, the table of contents alone is sufficient (but I urge buying the book, it is very readable and thought-provoking).





An Economy in Hock


La Reconquista (the Reconquering, Mexico has gotten all the way back to the Guadalupe-Hidalgo line)


Absolishing Self-Defense


Subordinating Ourselves


Subordinating Our Culture


Subordinating Our Country


An Ideology of Submission


Enforcing the Ideology


Disabling Americans


Spreading the Ideology


Can America Be Saved?


Reclaiming the Individual


Reclaiming the Economy


Reclaiming the Government


If All Else Fails







This is an enormously important book that speaks to the heart and mind of every person of any race or faith who believes in America the Beautiful, in dignity, justice, and liberty for all. That's not what we stand for today, and that is a travesty of epic proportions.







Amazon's Helpful Customer Review





bookloversfriend (United States) - See all my reviews(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)







The emphasis in this book is on HOW:

How militant Islamists get into the U. S., how they spread to cities and towns throughout the U.S., how they persuade us they are moderates, how they operate inside the U. S., how they manipulate our laws to protect their activities, how they exploit "political correctness" to escape detection.

Also, how the illegal immigration industry operates, how illegals are bussed to cities and towns throughout the U. S., how they are financed, how they have teams of free lawyers standing by to manipulate the laws of the U. S. to avoid deportation.

The INDOCTRINATION chapters include a detailed analysis of "political correctness" (which this book calls "Dhimmism" but might more properly be called "postliberalism"). We all use the term "political correctness" and think we know what it means, but most people have only a vague idea what it is, and we need to know. This book tells you in detail what it is and what it is not, how and why it developed, how it is enforced, and how it is spread.

The book tells you how colleges, schools, news media, law schools, courts and Hollywood came to be dominated by "political correctness", how more and more people are being indoctrinated into this new ideology, and how the minds of people so indoctrinated actually work, including why it is impossible to reason with them.

Your own children and grandchildren are being indoctrinated every day, not only in school, but from TV, pop/rock/rap music, and other sources.

Most urgently, the book tells you how "political correctness" protects the militant Islamists and illegal immigrants and guarantees that nothing will be done to stop them.

If you think somebody or other is taking care of these problems or will take care of them, then you need to read this book to find out you're living in a dream. If you think the government is so strong that you don't need to worry, then you're part of the sleeping America. People are already being hurt in many ways, but the worst is yet to come. The situation is not hopeless--not yet, but it will be in the near future if most people continue to be misinformed. Give a copy to everyone you love.