Showing posts with label John Barrow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Barrow. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Who to Contact about Opposing Immigration Amnesty! Some Republicans AND SOME DEMOCRATS!!

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com about who to contact about opposing Amnesty. This follows this post about investigating your area’s Town halls. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.

From NumbersUSA contact the GOP Representatives who have a F,D, or C grade and warn them to oppose immigration amnesty or they will receive a Primary Challenge.
After that, from NumbersUSA contact the DEMOCRACT Representatives who have a A, B, C, or D+ grade and tell them to oppose immigration amnesty to avoid a GOP Challenge.

You can write this to the GOP members:
Honorable Representative,




A primary challenge will await any Representative who votes for a House bill that is conferenced with the Senate. The best way to avoid any credible challenge is to make a public stand against any “pathway to citizenship” for immigration lawbreakers or Conference with the Senate during the August recess!



Rubio & Alexander: Unpopularity shows House Republicans that pro-amnesty not good way to advance career

One could literally "read the writing on the wall" for Republicans who are following the advice of their national party leaders, consultants and corporate fund-raisers to flood America's labor markets with foreign workers.

The words "Sen. Alexander under fire on immigration" scrolled across the electronic news screen that wraps around the corner of the complex that contains the local ABC TV station and Politico.

Being one of the 14 Republicans (30% of GOP Senators) who rescued the S. 744 amnesty bill from defeat last month is not helping any of them win any popularity contests.

RUBIO DROPS FROM 1st TO 6th IN PRESIDENTIAL POLL

Providing the starkest evidence was a Public Policy Polling report earlier this week on Sen Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). The firm was widely regarded as one of the most accurate during last year's presidential campaign. In its polling of preferences for a Republican presidential nominee, it found:

Marco Rubio, who had led all of our polling since December, has dropped all the way to 6th place. . . . Rubio was at 21 or 22% on all of our polls between January and March but his support has now dropped to half that level (10%)."

Rubio made the decision in January to become the face of the omnibus immigration bill, even allowing various special interest groups to run non-stop ads featuring him touting the legislation on conservative TV and radio, even though the bill was written primarily by the staff of New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer.

Rubio made sure that few Republican Primary voters across the nation would be unaware of his leadership for the giant bill. It was a huge gamble apparently based on national GOP consultants' belief that Rubio could convert conservative voters to his view that giving out some 30 million new green cards over the next decade would be good for the American people.

ALEXANDER'S SAVE OF AMNESTY BILL EARNING INTENSE EFFORT FOR A PRIMARY CHALLENGE

Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) did most of his work to pass the bill in the background. He is facing re-election in 2014 and let his fellow Tennessee Republican, Sen. Corker, take the public leadership for the amnesty since he was just re-elected last fall and has five years before having to answer to voters again.

But Tennessee voters don't look to be in a mood to give Alexander a pass, according to the Politico article last night:

Attending a rally in Smyrna, Tenn., last weekend, Alexander was greeted by a crowd of about 300 conservative activists -- organizers said -- wearing bright red T-shirts that read "Beat Lamar" in big bold letters. They held signs that blared: "You betrayed us" . . . Tea party groups were already watching Alexander given declining scores from the Club for Growth and Heritage Action, and they hope last month's immigration vote will be a tipping point against him. It's a test of their ability to punish GOP lawmakers for their stance on the Gang of Eight bill -- especially important given Senate Republicans did not move en masse to vote for the measure, and House Republicans want nothing to do with it.

"Unlike previous cycles, Lamar Alexander is in trouble," said Drew Ryun, political director of the conservative Madison Project and a former Republican National Committee deputy director. "Immigration is the big issue, especially given some of the things he's said in the past. His political doublespeak isn't going to work this time."

Activists representing several local tea party groups in Tennessee have teamed up with national conservative groups such as FreedomWorks, the Madison Project and Senate Conservatives Fund to find a credible, conservative candidate who can challenge Alexander in next year's primary.

Alexander, like most of the Republican Senators who voted for the big increase in foreign labor, has a huge campaign war chest filled with donations from the corporate wing of the party. It will be very difficult for a challenger to beat him. But just having to compete in a Primary is at the least a costly indignity that most incumbents of either party abhor.

PAUL RYAN LEAKS PRO-AMNESTY GOP LEADERS' TIME-TABLE

Speaking of Republicans trying to imitate Marco Rubio.

The Hill newspaper has just reported that Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has told a town hall event what House GOP leaders hope to do this fall.

He says the floor votes are tentatively planned for October. According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Ryan indicated that Speaker Boehner hopes to get votes on the very weak border security bill, on the excellent legislation on interior enforcement, on bills to expand legal immigration and then some kind of amnesty.

Ryan just said negotiations are underway to vote on legislation to provide illegal aliens with "probationary" visas while they wait a minimum of 15 years to attain citizenship.

The newspaper said it contacted House leadership to see if Ryan's timetable was accurate and was told only that there were "no scheduling announcements to make."

A hopeful supporter,

YOU CAN WRITE THIS TO THE DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATIVES:   Honorable Representative,

I am asking you to make a public statement against S.744 and any “pathway to citizenship”. This will avoid a serious GOP opponent in the 2014 election by not allowing him or her to outflank you on this.

This bill will allow 33 million new immigrants over the next decade.

The 33 million green cards offered by S. 744 in the first decade would go to:

• around 11 million for illegal aliens (could be millions more if the official estimate is wrong)

• around 11 million in continuation of elevated flows from 1990 surge policy

• around 5 million from end of numerical limits on people waiting in line (mostly chain migration)

• around 6 million from new and expanded categories

On the other hand,

Nearly every section of the Gang Amnesty bill seems to add more foreign workers to compete with unemployed and underemployed Americans. The Gang apparently believes that the way to help the 20 million Americans who can't find a full-time job is to give out another 20-30 million lifetime work permits to foreign citizens over the next decade.

This bill would further flood labor markets at the lower-skill levels where real wages have declined 10% to 22% since 1980.

If the bill becomes law, the chances of Americans with no more than a high school education entering the middle class may disappear.

But it isn't just the low-end where Americans are threatened. The bill would make huge increases in importing higher-educated workers at a time when around half of all recent American college graduates either have no job at all or they aren't working in a degree job.

The under-32 Millennial Generation already is in danger of being a lost generation. After this bill, we may see these young adults spend the rest of their lives only partly engaged in the economy as they depend on government and family.



None of this is the kind of economy or society most Americans desire. Surely a compassionate and thoughtful citizenry will put a stop to this nonsense and ask its Representatives to go back to work putting Americans back to work.

In appreciation of your consideration,

Thursday, October 11, 2012

8 Ace Dems on Jobs/Immigration

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com about immigration enforcement DEMOCRATS! This follows this post about the swing state of Colorado.   This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE.

8 Ace Dems on Jobs/Immigration


https://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/october-9-2012/8-ace-dems-jobsimmigration.html



By Roy Beck, Tuesday - posted on NumbersUSA



With the baseball post-season in full swing, let's just say that the following eight U.S. Representatives are the ACES of the Democratic team in Congress when it comes to giving priority to American workers over illegal foreign workers and over bringing in new immigrant workers.



All of them got an A-grade on our immigration report cards over the last four years. That means every -- or almost every -- action they took on immigration was designed to reduce illegal immigration or reduce unnecessary legal immigrant worker importation during a time when 20 million Americans can't find a full-time job.


https://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/october-9-2012/8-ace-dems-jobsimmigration.html


I want to say a few more words about the "8 Aces."



Their concern for protecting unemployed Americans from unfair competition from federal immigration policies apparently is not dictated by regional issues. Most regions of the country are represented in this group: Northeast, Midwest, West, Plains and South.



Unlike most Members of Congress, including the leaders of their own Party, these U.S. Representatives saw the reports that 7 million illegal aliens hold U.S. jobs and tried to do something to get them out of those jobs so that unemployed Americans could take them.



These "8 Aces" also looked at reports that 20 million Americans who want a full-time job can't find one and supported efforts to reduce the 1 million permanent work permits that our government issues each year to new immigrants.



If the majority of Congress had acted as responsibly as these eight Democrats, millions of unemployed Americans would be working today, paying taxes and using fewer government services.



At the end of a Congress in which Republican leaders of the House and Democratic leaders of the Senate did everything they could to protect illegal foreign workers and the businesses who insist on immigrant labor over American labor, this is a good time to properly thank the politicians who tried to stand up to their leaders.



ROY BECK is the CEO & Founder of NumbersUSA



NumbersUSA's blogs are copyrighted and may be republished or reposted only if they are copied in their entirety, including this paragraph, and provide proper credit to NumbersUSA. NumbersUSA bears no responsibility for where our blogs may be republished or reposted.

Friday, June 3, 2011

Many immigration 'step victories' in U.S. House last 24 hours‏

An urgent post from http://www.numbersusa.com/ about immigration Amendments in the Homeland Security Appropriations bill. This follows this previous post about the process happinging.  This follows this post about congressional redistricting and this follows this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso, where President Barack Obama recently bashed immigration enforcement! On a related note, you can read about Miss Kentucky Latina here, an interesting article about Jessica Alba here or another article about Salma Hayek here. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

Many immigration 'step victories' in U.S. House last 24 hours‏

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/action.htm

From: Roy Beck, President, NumbersUSA






VIEW ALL THE IMMIGRATION-ENFORCEMENT

STEP VICTORIES FROM LAST 24 HOURS HERE!!!



U.S. HOUSE PASSES SEVERAL AMENDMENTS

TO DHS SPENDING BILL THAT IMPROVE

ENFORCEMENT AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION



Send Free Thank-You or Shame-on-You Fax

To Your Representative For His/Her Voting



See fax on your customized NumbersUSA Action Board.
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/action.htm







Thanks to all of you for what you did to bring about these victories in the last 24 hours.



The House just finished voting on all amendments to the 2012 spending bill for the Department of Homeland Security. We/you won on every immigration vote.



I'm happy to report that the Cravaack amendment about which you have phoned all today passed 288 to 130 a few minutes ago! (See description below.)



Large and broad bi-partisan majorities of the U.S. House last night and today agreed to put significantly more money and oomph into key programs to reduce the illegal population of this country.



The amendments were proposed by both Republican and Democratic Members.



In each case, money that was added to enforcement was taken from another part of the Department of Homeland Security budget so the effect of the approved amendments was zero increase in overall spending.



ACTION: Go to your customized Action Board and find the fax to send to your Representative about his/her key vote. (If you don't find one, your Representative is one of the 7 Republicans and 7 Democrats who didn't vote.)



Click here www.numbersusa.com/actionbuffet



Pouring faxes into the Members' offices on this key vote on the Royce amendment will improve chances of good votes on amendments in the future. (We'll provide you some other faxing opportunities tomorrow. Some of you may already have sent the new fax above if you happened onto it while visiting your Action Board this afternoon.)



I'm pleased to tell you that your NumbersUSA Capitol Hill Team was involved with each of the congressional offices in crafting and introducing the following amendments that were approved by the U.S. House.



NEARLY 20% INCREASE IN FUNDING

FEDERAL TRAINING OF LOCAL POLICE

TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS UNDER 287(g)



This was a tremendous step victory for all of you who want to see more immigration enforcement from local police.



Although the open-borders groups constantly try to end the federal 287(g) program, we won this amendment 267 to 151.



And 36 Democrats bucked their Party's general opposition to local police enforcement of immigration laws, voting with all but one Republican to actually increase local participation.



This was the first immigration amendment that came up last night in a two-day marathon of appropriations amendments. It was offered by Rep. Ed Royce (R-Calif.) who asked to move money from the Office of the Secretary of Management at DHS and add it to money already included for DHS to facilitate new agreements with local governments under Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.



Lots of city, county and state law enforcement agencies have asked to be part of the program but can't because of a huge waiting list for training.



The holdup is lack of money appropriated by Congress for the training that must take place before local agencies are allowed to enforce certain immigration laws.



Royce's amendment would add nearly 20% to the funding for such training.



The opposition on the floor was led by Rep. Price (D-N.C.) who was in charge of these appropriations the previous four years and tried to starve the 287(g) program. He took the microphone and argued not only against Royce's amendment but against allowing the local enforcement program to continue at all.



Fortunately, Price is no longer in charge.



HOUSE CRUSHES REP. POLIS' EFFORT

TO END LOCAL ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS



Late this afternoon, Boulder's Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) surprised us by taking advantage of the open amendment process and offered an amendment that not only would negate our victory from last night on the Royce amendment but would remove ALL FUNDING for the 287(g) program.



This set up a wonderful opportunity for voters nationwide to find out who stands with the open-borders lobbies who oppose virtually every kind of enforcement against illegal immigration. They have been calling for Pres. Obama to just shut down 287(g) by executive fiat. So, Rep. Polis gave every Member of the House a chance to stand in solidarity with the open-borders groups.



Distressingly 107 Members of the U.S. House were willing to do that. We will provide the list of these pro-illegal-immigration Members on our website as soon as we get it.



But reassuringly, Rep. Polis' attempt to show Pres. Obama that doing away with local enforcement is politically popular failed miserably.



U.S. Representatives voted 312 to 107 to continue the federal program for local enforcement of immigration laws.



All 231 Republican votes were for 287(g) local enforcement.



And 81 of the 188 Democratic votes (43%) also stood behind local enforcement.



While the open-borders groups may be able to brag to Pres. Obama that they are the voice of the majority of Democrats in the House, it is a very narrow majority in the minority Party.



What we can say is that there is an overwhelming majority (74%) of the entire House -- a BROAD BI-PARTISAN majority -- that backs local enforcement of immigration laws.



And we now know the names of the fringe minority who don't.



These votes should be reflected on our NumbersUSA Immigration-Reduction Report Cards later Friday.



$5 MILLION MORE FOR FEDERAL CENTER THAT ASSISTS

LOCAL POLICE WHEN THEY ENCOUNTER ILLEGAL ALIENS



John Barrow, the Democratic Representative for Savannah and Augusta, Georgia, is a great leader of that "43% Pro-Enforcement Wing of Democratic Representatives).



He championed a great amendment last night that would move $5 million from the DHS administration budget to add to the salaries and expenses for the Law Enforcement Support Center.



This is the national call center that provides assistance to state and local law enforcement when they are dealing with illegal aliens.



The Center has been woefully under-manned and under-funded.



While there remains quite a debate about how much state, county and local law enforcement should be REQUIRED to do in enforcing immigration laws, surely nearly everybody can agree that the federal government should assist those jurisdictions that ASK for help in identifying and processing illegal aliens.



Rep. Barrow's amendment augments beautifully Rep. Royce's amendment on 287(g), which is also about helping those jurisdictions that don't want to put the welcome mat out for illegal aliens.



LEADERS OF BOTH PARTIES APPARENTLY DECIDED THEY DIDN'T WANT MANY ROLL CALL VOTES ON IMMIGRATION AMENDMENTS



Interestingly, after the lop-sided win for Royce's 287(g) amendment early last night, both Democratic and Republican leaders basically quit asking for roll call votes on immigration amendments the rest of the evening.



Rep. Barrow's amendment was approved by voice vote, with nobody challenging and asking for a recorded vote.



I am most pleased to see Democratic leaders decide that recorded votes showing the majority of Democrats opposing enforcement would be bad politically. This shows that the Democratic leaders are aware that the current Party line of opposing most immigration enforcement (unless tied to an amnesty) is politically unpopular.



My guess is that Democratic leaders were not particularly pleased with Rep. Polis' grandstanding late this afternoon and putting so many of the anti-enforcement Democrats on record.



HOUSE FINALLY BACKS OUR ROSEMARY JENKS'

CRUSADES TO ATTACK ARIZONA 'SPOTTER NESTS'

AND SUPPORT THE 'SHADOW WOLVES'



This was really quite a savory moment for Rosemary Jenks, your NumbersUSA Director of Government Relations.



By voice vote and after colorful descriptions by the sponsor, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), the House approved by voice vote two amendments that would:

set aside $1 million for the Border Patrol to use to eliminate the Mexican drug cartels' look-out posts along the borders,





set aside $1 million for hiring additional Shadow Wolves, the extraordinarily and uniquely talented Native Americans who track illegal aliens and foreign para-military along the Mexican border.

Over several years, Rosemary has taken Congressman King and other Members of Congress to the border to show them the outrageous "Spotter Nests" atop scores of desert hills and mountains in Arizona that are used by the Mexican drug cartels.



Rosemary has led these "tours" in climbing to the nests in the blazing summer sun and occasionally in dramatic helicopter hoverings that get to the nests more easily but less safely. They often didn't know until they were near the nests whether the well-armed spotters were absent. Of course from their vantage point, the spotters had plenty of time to leave once they saw the delegation approaching.



The "Spotters" use the nests to watch all movements by our Border Patrol and then radio to smugglers of drugs and people where to avoid and where to hide based on the location of the Border Patrol.



The Native American Shadow Wolves have played a key role in our understanding of the problem of the Spotter Nests and other issues along the border. On-the-ground federal personnel in Arizona have also confirmed the nest locations (off the record, of course). They have told us that higher-ups will not authorize eliminating the Spotter Nests.



We always thought government officials and the news media would find it outrageous that foreign criminal agents are occupying U.S. territory so cavalierly with little challenge.



We were wrong.



A number of Congressmen have tried to get first the Bush Administration and then the Obama Administration to take out these Spotter Nests. But for unexplained reasons, both Administrations have preferred not to challenge the drug cartels.



Rosemary (with me in hand at times) has tried to "sell" this story over the years to many news media outlets, including NBC and Fox. This story is ready-made for dramatic TV investigative reporting. But again NOTHING. We suspect that the government in each case has scared reporters off the story by denying the existence of the Spotters.



Nobody has pursued this strange situation of sovereignty infringement like Rep. King. His amendment is one more effort to push the feds into either doing something about the Spotters Nests or taking Congress into its confidence as to why our government is willing to have drug cartels greatly improve their ability to move illegal aliens (and drugs) past our Border Patrol on a daily basis.



THE FACT THAT 130 MEMBERS VOTED TO ALLOW VIOLENT ILLEGAL ALIENS TO BE RELEASED INTO OUR POPULATION SHOWED THE NEED FOR THE AMENDMENT TO STOP THE PRACTICE



We won 288 to 130 on the amendment to block funding that allows the Administration to release violent illegal aliens into the U.S. population while awaiting deportation.



The amendment came from freshman Rep. Chip Cravaack (R-Minn.). Some of our NumbersUSA members wondered if this wasn't just a creampuff amendment that would allow 435 Members of the House to get a pro-enforcement vote. After all, who could be in favor of releasing violent illegal aliens into our communities?



But 130 Members opposed the amendment. You'll see their names on our website as soon as we get them.



OTHER OF OUR AMENDMENTS THAT PASSED BY VOICE VOTE

Amendment by Rep. Poe (R-Texas) to withhold certain federal funds from cities that have sanctuary policies that prohibit local police cooperation with federal immigration authorities.





Another amendment by Rep. Poe that prohibits the President and Administration from using the "deferred action" tool to give temporary amnesty to large numbers of illegal aliens. As defined by law, deferred action on deportation of an illegal alien is supposed to be case-by-case based on very special circumstances. Instead, the Administration's use of "deferred action" last year has grown from an average of 900 cases a year to 12,000 last year.





The final bill included an amendment by Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) requiring all contractors with the federal government to use E-Verify. Although this is already required by Pres. Obama's executive order in 2009, this amendment would eliminate the ability of this or any future President to cease the requirement. We were pleased that this amendment was so persuasive that appropriations leaders added it to the underlying spending bill before it was brought to the floor.

'STEP VICTORIES' ARE ONLY THE BEGINNING OF THE ROAD TO TRUE IMPROVEMENT -- BUT WE CAN'T GET THERE WITHOUT THESE ESSENTIAL FIRST STEPS



I hasten to explain that we call the votes "step victories" because they are just a step in the process. Until they are part of legislation signed into law, nothing actually gets better. Improvements that are still there in a signed bill are the only things that can truly be called "victories."



(1) The House has the responsibility of starting appropriations bills. (2) Then the Senate takes up the passed bills and either approves them in entirety or (3) amends them and (4) sends them back to the House (5) or to a Joint Conference committee to iron out the differences (6) after which the compromise conference bill goes back to both Senate and House for another approval vote, (7) and at the end of whatever scenario a bill goes to the President to sign or veto.



Nonetheless, you can't get to the President's desk unless somebody somewhere first approves what you want. That happened last night -- SEVERAL TIMES!



THANKS AGAIN, AND I HOPE YOU FEEL A DEEP SENSE OF SATISFACTION WITH THESE 'STEP VICTORIES.' WE'LL KEEP YOU INFORMED AS THE APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS MOVES FORWARD.
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/action.htm