Showing posts with label Emanuel Cleaver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emanuel Cleaver. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Congressional Black Caucus Holds Meeting to Blast Pro-Lifers

An interesting story from http://www.lifenews.com/  about the Congressional Black Caucus's view on abortion. This follows this post about the dangers as using disability as a reason for abortion. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can also get a very interesting book HERE!

Congressional Black Caucus Holds Meeting to Blast Pro-Lifers


On May 10 the Congressional Black Caucus and Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus were honorary co-hosts of a wordy briefing entitled, “African Americans’ Attitudes on Abortion, Contraception, and Reproductive, Justice: From Public Opinion to Policymaking,” held at the U.S. Capitol.



On the agenda: “numerous challenges to accessing quality, affordable reproductive health care… exacerbated by campaigns targeting the African American community”

“research on the latest attitudes and concerns of African Americans relating to reproductive justice”

“key messaging as a response to attacks and threats to reproductive rights” http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/18/congressional-black-caucus-holds-meeting-to-blast-pro-lifers/



Friday, March 30, 2012

ABC's Reckless Zimmerman Video 'Exclusive' Reveals Nothing

Here is an interesting article from www.breitbart.com about the latest on the Trayvon Martin case. This follows this post about the Knoxville Horror case. This follows this prevous post about it or this post about a white person who was burned by a black gang from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ and this post about the Congressional Black Caucus that you can contact and you can read the very interesting book that is being shown HERE!

ABC's Reckless Zimmerman Video 'Exclusive' Reveals Nothing

30
2
69

 

ABC is hyping a grainy police surveillance video in an outrageous and reckless attempt to suggest that police and Zimmerman may be lying as regards events on the night Trayvon Martin was shot and killed.


It is an egregious abuse of the network's influence and quest for attention from non-news, as death threats and demands for retaliation spread. Are we to believe that a widely distributed mugshot of Zimmerman suddenly doesn't exist just so ABC can tout an alleged video scoop?


Trayvon Martin Video Shows No Blood or Bruises on George Zimmerman


It's ridiculous to believe that the low quality video reveals anything we didn't already know about events that night. Compare the mugshot to the weak video and judge for yourself.
According to reports, Zimmerman was attended to at the scene of the incident by paramedics. An investigation began, and there was no rush to take Zimmerman to a hospital, or simply to remove him before he was cleaned up somehow.

Already, the Martin family is saying this new video somehow reveals something we didn't know. True, there appears to be no blood on Zimmerman's shirt in the new video. He is pictured in a gray T-shirt. Yet in ABC's own report from March 13 on the fateful events of Feb. 26, ABC claimed Zimmerman was wearing a red "sweatshirt." While Zimmerman is wearing a red and black jacket in this new video, we have no idea if he may have taken off a sweatshirt at the scene.

If it was that jacket and not a sweatshirt Zimmerman was wearing at the time, again, the grainy quality of the video makes it impossible to determine if there was blood on it to some extent. All ABC has done here is overreach for a so-called scoop in a tragic story in which we don't yet know all the details. The new video sheds no real new light on what happens. It only agitates emotions surrounding the case while they are more than agitated enough already. ABC should be ashamed of its reckless highlighting of a non-story for the benefit of their network and no one else.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Let us pause to remember Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, victims of a true hate crime

Here is an interesting article from www.thepoliticalcesspool.org about the Knoxville Horror case. This follows this post about the latest on the Trayvon Martin shooting case. This follows this prevous post about it or this post about a white person who was burned by a black gang from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ and this post about the Congressional Black Caucus that you can contact and you can read the very interesting book that is being shown HERE!

Let us pause to remember Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, victims of a true hate crime

As we continue to swirl in the media manufactured story involving the so-called racially motivated shooting of Trayvon Martin, let us pause to remember two victims of a genuine hate crime.
Channon Christian, 21, and Chris Newsom, 23, were a couple from Knoxville, Tennessee. They were both raped, tortured and murdered after being kidnapped by a gang of five black “youths” or “teens.”
This crime, which was far more heinous than even the most sensational version of the Trayvon Martin affair, received relatively little media coverage.
I was fortunate enough to be able to bring some notice to it during one of my appearances on CNN, which you can watch below.

This CNN clip will provide you with background information regarding the Christian/Newsom story. I am introduced at the 4:44 mark. The video has over 100,000 views.
Whites are murdered and menaced by blacks everyday, and virtually all of these instances go unreported.
While tragic, why is the media hell bent on stirring up such ant-White hatred (even though George Zimmerman is Hispanic) by using Trayvon Martin as their pawn?

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Trayvon Martin Lynch Mob Fury—Douse the Flames, Mr. President!

Here is an interesting article from www.vdare.com about the latest on the Trayvon Martin shooting case. This follows this prevous post about it or this post about a white person who was burned by a black gang from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ and this post about the Congressional Black Caucus that you can contact and you can read the very interesting book that is being shown HERE!

Trayvon Martin Lynch Mob Fury—Douse the Flames, Mr. President!

Barack Obama's statement that the death of Trayvon Martin was a tragedy that cries out for a more thorough investigation was the right and necessary thing to say.

But it fell far short of what was needed: a presidential call for a halt to the rhetoric that is stirring up racial rage and inflaming the nation. The incendiary language being deployed is both divisive and dangerous.

Addressing the Sanford, Fla., incident, Black Muslim Minister Louis Farrakhan tweeted: "Where there is no justice, there will be no peace. Soon, and very soon, the law of retaliation may ... be applied."

The New Black Panther Party has issued a "Wanted Dead or Alive" poster featuring the face of George Zimmerman, the man who shot Martin, and printed up a flier saying Martin was "murdered in cold blood."

When Panther leader Mikhail Muhammad was asked if this could ignite an explosive situation that has already seen death threats drive Zimmerman and his father from their homes, Muhammad cursed and said Zimmerman "should be fearful for his life."

Demanding "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth," the Black Panther leader offered $10,000 for Zimmerman's capture and called for 5,000 black men to run him down.

"If the government won't do the job, we'll do it," he warned.

Spike Lee helpfully tweeted Zimmerman's home address.

Friends say Zimmerman fears for his life. One man has already been arrested for threatening to kill Bill Lee, the Sanford police chief who has stepped down and turned the investigation over to the state, the Justice Department, the FBI and a special prosecutor.

Returning from Geneva, Jesse Jackson, too, headed for Sanford, saying: "Blacks are under attack. ... Targeting, arresting, convicting blacks and ultimately killing us is big business." On arrival, Jackson said Trayvon Martin was a "kid shot down in cold blood by a vigilante."

Talk show host Joe Madison charged Zimmerman with a "hate crime." The Grio, a black news and opinion website, compares the killing of Trayvon Martin to the 1955 murder of Emmett Till in Mississippi.

Till, 14, had flirted with a white woman. Her husband and brother kidnapped, mutilated and murdered the boy and dumped his body into the Tallahatchie River. Emmett Till was lynched.

Trayvon Martin was shot by an overzealous Neighborhood Watch volunteer who grew suspicious of an unfamiliar black man or youth in a hoodie walking at night in the rain in a gated community he patrolled.

What appears to have happened is that, after alerting police to Martin's presence, Zimmerman followed him in his SUV—against the advice of the cops. Where the street ended, Zimmerman got out.

A fight ensued. According to two witnesses, Zimmerman was losing, flat on his back, screaming for help. It seems unlikely a 17-year-old football player like Martin, angry and in a fistfight, would be screaming for help.

Police say that when they got there, they found Martin dead and Zimmerman with a bloody nose, a cut on the back of his head and grass stains on the back of his shirt.

Did Zimmerman, on his back, losing the fight, fearing this black kid was a criminal who might beat him to death or grab his gun, fire in presumed self defense? Did Martin, who had a right to be enraged with this character following and hassling him, start the fight?

Would Zimmerman, who carried a legal firearm, start a fistfight with an athletic black youth who was reportedly 6 inches taller?

The scenario above appears to be the one upon which Sanford police relied when they declined to arrest Zimmerman. That Trayvon's body was taken to the morgue and identified as "John Doe" suggests that the police, too, concluded he was an intruder.

They were terribly wrong, as was Zimmerman. But to call this cold-blooded murder or an Emmett Till-type lynching appears, from the existing evidence, to be both demagogic and inflammatory.

Yet, there are questions that need answers.

Why, with a dead teenager, did the Sanford police not bring in Zimmerman and get his story on paper?

Some journalists contend there are racial slurs on the tapes of Zimmerman talking to the cops. Others hear no such thing.

Zimmerman's father calls the media portrayal of his son as a racist an injustice, and says his son has a Peruvian mother, is Spanish-speaking, grew up in a multiracial family and has many black friends.

And the clamor of the crowd—"Arrest him!"—raises a question.

Arrest him—for what?

If the Sanford police believe they have no case for murder or manslaughter or any felony, what do they charge him with, after they arrest him?

More critically, where is President Obama?

When Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot during a rampage by a crazed gunmen, Obama stepped in with a splendid address to cool the passions and call a halt to the false and fevered accusations of moral complicity in the monstrous crime of a lone killer.

Where is the Obama of Tucson now?

Patrick J. Buchanan needs no introduction to VDARE.COM readers; his book State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, can be ordered from Amazon.com. His most recent published book is Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World,reviewed here by Paul Craig Roberts. His new book Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025? was released October 18, and is rocketing up the charts.

GOP Wouldn't Challenge Black Voter Fraud in 2008—Why Would It Challenge Trayvon Martin Lynch Mob Now?

Here is an interesting article from www.vdare.com about the latest on the Trayvon Martin shooting case. This follows this prevous post about it or this post about a white person who was burned by a black gang from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ and this post about the Congressional Black Caucus that you can contact and you can read the very interesting book that is being shown HERE!

GOP Wouldn't Challenge Black Voter Fraud in 2008—Why Would It Challenge Trayvon Martin Lynch Mob Now?

A month after the Trayvon Martin killing, protests continue to mount, spurred on by the White House and President Obama blatantly attempting to incite the Democratic Party base and demoralize that of the GOP.
At the same time, helpfully publicized by guerilla websites like Drudge, VDARE.com and my own SBPDL, the Left-wing narrative is unwinding with embarrassing speed—see for example, Trayvon Martin case: Martin was the aggressor, police sources say, by Rene Lynch, Chicago Tribune, March 26, 2012.
But that will do no good if the GOP leadership behaves with the cowardice that Senator John McCain displayed about challenging Democratic voter fraud in the 2008 election.
The shooting of Trayvon Martin has become the defining moment in the Obama Presidency. It’s becoming obvious that, as the 50 black teenagers shouted at the white Marshall family when they attacked their home in Akron, Ohio, after the 2009 July 4th weekend: “This is a black world.” [Akron police investigate teen mob attack on family, By Phil Trexler, Akron Beacon Journal, July 7, 2009]
(Not much seems to have been done about this—see follow-up stores from the same reporter: FBI asked to investigate attack on white family near Firestone Park, July 10, 2009 and Akron Attack Victims Frustrated With Police ResponseJuly 20, 2009.)
Obama did not go on record or call it a “soul searching” moment:
  • when The Detroit Free Press published a special investigative, multiple-part work (Living with Murder, November 12, 2011) that reported in 89 percent black Detroit, 3,313 lives have been taken since 2003?
Almost of all the black people murdered in America are killed by other black people. This is one of the primary reasons that cities with high populations of minorities have lower property values and a discernible lack of a business district: people are fearful of raising a family there. And they are right to be fearful.
Indeed, in a number of cities with impossible high rates of black-on-black crime, city leaders, police, officials, and members of the black community have appealed for extraordinary measures (even “martial law”) to stabilize the situation.
The Harrisburg Chapter of the NAACP is calling on Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell to suspend some civil liberties and impose martial law in the city to halt the wave of recent lawlessness.
Chapter President Stanley Lawson also called on Rendell to bring in the state National Guard for at least 30 days and to impose a curfew. In June, there have been at least 12 shootings, many of them in the daytime, including a man killed Wednesday at a busy city intersection during the lunch hour.
  • In Cleveland, Ohio, an emergency curfew was passed—to the objection of the ACLU over the racial connotations—because of black Flash Mobs attacking law-abiding citizens, the first step toward martial law being declared and freedom for everyone being eroded.
  • In Columbia, SC, an emergency curfew was passed after the beating of Carter Strange. The ACLU objected to the idea of a curfew because it would be primarily black people affected by the rule). [Columbia curfew proposal faces opposition]
  • In Newark, New Jersey, Mayor Cory Booker was forced to create a Safe City Task Force and suspend freedoms for everyone by implementing an emergency curfew.
  • In Indianapolis, because of the high numbers of shootings of black people by fellow black people at the 2010 Indiana black Expo, the 2011 version had hundreds of extra police and volunteers in a bid to keep the peace. But at what cost? Erika Smith, writing for the Indy Star, reported happily that no one was shot, but noted: “It looked like the government had declared martial law after the sun went down Friday.”
In Louisiana, State Rep. Austin Badon has stated that the National Guard should patrol New Orleans’ Bourbon Street again—not because of Hurricane Katrina looters, but because of high rates of black-on-black crime. The New York Times was appalled to find that the “killers and their victims are overwhelmingly young black men”. [New Orleans Struggles to Stem Homicides, By Campbell Robertson, December 7, 2011] black people cried foul when a new curfew was introduced in The Big Easy in early 2012, even though the law was enacted on their behalf.
Black on black killings have been on the rise in the Music City. The Washington D.C. based Violence Policy Center noted Nashville had 42 African American murders in 2008, with an even higher rate than Memphis in 2009. Nearly half the murder total can be pinpointed to the large public housing communities such as Napier and Tony Sudekum Homes.
Unlike Memphis where years of concerted effort by the city to pursue federal grants resulting in the abolishment of 5 infamous housing projects, Nashville has been slow in tearing down such violence-breeding enclaves
There’s a silver-lining to all this though: High rates of “urban” crime in St. Louis —invariably black-on-black—helps prepare Air Force trauma surgeons for the type of blunt wounds they’ll see in combat.
Similarly, high levels of black on black crime in Baltimore makes the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center an excellent place for training military doctors before they are deployed to conflict zones around the world.
It’s not polite to report on black-on-black crime. You might upset the black community.
Thus in 2010, the Buffalo News was attacked by the black community in the city after daring to publish a story that acknowledged high levels of black criminality:
Black community voices outrage over story on City Grill victims
By Harold McNeil, September 1, 2010
About 700 members of Buffalo's African-American community tonight shared their grievances with Buffalo News Editor Margaret Sullivan over an Aug. 22 article on the criminal backgrounds of victims of the shooting at the City Grill three weeks ago. [7 of 8 shooting victims had criminal past | Some suggest lifestyle, associations may have put them in harm's way February 19, 2011]
The forum, held in True Bethel Baptist Church, 907 E. Ferry St., was one that Sullivan had requested following negative reaction to the report.
Many in the crowd expressed outrage that the police records of the shooting victims were reported at all. They called the report a gross departure from how The News traditionally treats crime victims and that it was disrespectful to the victims, their families and the African-American community.
One of the most important, and overlooked, news items to come out of Wikileaks: the news that black Democrats in Philadelphia and Ohio engaged in voter fraud during the 2008 President of the United States election. Andrea Shea King of WND.com reported that
“2008 Republican presidential candidate John McCain decided not to pursue legal action against the Democrats for engaging in voter fraud, believing that to do so would have thrown the country into civil unrest…” [Wikileaks reveals Democrat 2008 election crimes, March 5, 2012]
According to one leaked email on Wikileaks.org:
After discussions with his inner circle, which explains the delay in his speech, McCain decided not to pursue the voter fraud in PA and Ohio, despite his staff's desire to make it an issue. He said no. Staff felt they could get a federal injunction to stop the process. McCain felt the crowds assembled in support of Obama and such would be detrimental to our country and it would do our nation no good for this to drag out like last go around, coupled with the possibility of domestic violence.
But since Obama’s election, we’ve had nothing but “domestic violence” in communities across the country—with the rights of law-abiding citizens restricted due to the actions of, primarily, black males.
Looking at the landscape of the America in 2012, seeing how many cities require curfews to keep the peace, it is easy to discern the type of “civil unrest” McCain feared. [VDARE.com Note: From our we-told-you-so files, see The Riots Next Time? Racial Violence Looms If Barack Obama Loses—Or Wins, By Matthew Richer on October 24, 2008]
Why does Obama demand “soul-searching” over the death of Trayvon Martin, when every day in America there are hundreds of incidents that should cause all of us to stop and think?
If the eventual GOP nominee is smart, he’ll make this moment—when Barack Obama interjected himself into a sub judice situation whose details are still emerging—decisive in the 2012 race for the White House.
He will demand that President Obama explain why all those murdered black people (forget white people) in Detroit and elsewhere—killed by other black people – aren’t worthy of a “soul searching” moment.
How about it, Mittens?
Mittens?
Ah, fuhgeddaboutit.
Paul Kersey[Email him] is the author of the blog SBPDL, and has published the books SBPDL Year One, Hollywood in Blackface and Captain America and Whiteness: The Dilemma of the Superhero.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Trayvon Martin: Black Law Prof Says Suspecting Black Youths A Hate Crime

Here is an interesting article from www.vdare.com about the latest on the Trayvon Martin shooting case. This follows this prevous post about it or this post about a white person who was burned by a black gang from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ and this post about the Congressional Black Caucus that you can contact and you can read the very interesting book that is being shown HERE!




Trayvon Martin: Black Law Prof Says Suspecting Black Youths A Hate Crime

Tibbs
Professor Tibbs: Supporting Black Legal Privilege
The Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman lynch mob incited by President Obama continues to gather.
This situation has the merit of revealing the blatant Minority Supremacism which increasingly motivates the new American Nomenklatura
"He was not suspicious. What makes him suspicious in the moment is the fact that he was black. If Trayvon Martin was white, would any of this have happened?"
This absurd remark (If he had been white, why would anyone have been afraid?) is from US could bring hate charge in Fla. teen shooting By Curt Anderson Boston.com March 25, 2012
The source is one Donald Tibbs a black “Law Professor” at Drexel University (Boston.com suppressed Tibb’s race). Tibbs also said


"It sounds pretty obvious to me…If that was a racial epithet that preceded the attack on Trayvon Martin, we definitely have a hate crime."
What Tibbs (email him) suggests here is very ominous
  • The fact that young black men commit fantastically disproportionate quantities of violent crime has to be ignored.
  • An expletive uttered in the course of violent combat should project the case to a much serious and dangerous level.
These Black Law Professors are a problem.
At the national level the Trayvon Martin case is about privilege: treating the Black community as if it is not in fact disproportionately criminal – to the detriment of Whites.
As in the Duke case, Nicholas Stix Uncensored is indispensible: see Barack Obama: Because Trayvon Martin was Black, and Vaguely Resembled Me, “All of Us Have to Do Some Soul-Searching”

I’ll tell you what, John Doe/whatever-your-name is: When you start calling for soul-searching on behalf of all of the thousands of white victims of black racism just since your election, then I’ll set aside a minute or two for soul-searching about Trayvon Martin. Bet?
And Angry White Dude has rallied to the Colors:

IF ZIMMERMAN WAS BLACK, THE TREYVON MARTIN STORY WOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN HEARD

Obama and his racist, anti-American minions are working overtime to create a race war or some other type of violence before the November election.
All of this was completely predictable.

Lynching George Zimmerman—Overwhelming America’s Historic White Majority

Here is an interesting article from www.vdare.com about the latest on the Trayvon Martin shooting case. This follows this prevous post about it or this post about a white person who was burned by a black gang from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ and this post about the Congressional Black Caucus that you can contact and you can read the very interesting book that is being shown HERE!

Lynching George Zimmerman—Overwhelming America’s Historic White Majority

The Obama White House continues to incite the lynching of George Zimmerman, although he has not even been charged in the death of Trayvon Martin—yet. And with typical uselessness, the Righteous Right has rolled over on its back like a spaniel.
On the Sunday morning CNN talk show State of the Union, White House spokesman David Plouffe doubled down on President Obama’s controversial comments on the case, calling GOP Presidential contenders Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum’s wimpy criticisms “reprehensible” and an appeal to [white?!!!??] “people’s worst instincts”. [Transcript]
On ABC’s The Week, George Will, perhaps the prototypical Main Stream Media [MSM] professional token conservative, took refuge in condemning Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law—designed to avoid the crazy cases where homeowners have gone to jail for resisting burglars. He did, however, caution that the MSM and “certain well-known agitators” ended up looking like fools in the Duke Rape Hoax.
For it’s not just blacks and white Lefties who are spouting this false narrative. Sean Hannity has sounded just like the liberals on his radio and TV show—though, like Will, he has dutifully intoned that we still need all the facts. And that’s essentially the line Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich have parroted also.
National Review’s ignominious contribution to the issue: a now-notorious column by Editor Rich Lowry titled “Al Sharpton is Right.”
As it happens, of course, the shooter, George Zimmerman, is Hispanic. According to reports, Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, had a head wound and was heard screaming for help prior to shooting Martin. Zimmerman claims the boy attacked him from behind after trying to walk away from the confrontation. Over the weekend, a new witness surfaced who seemed to corroborate this. [Witness: Martin attacked Zimmerman, Fox Tampa, March 23, 2012]
Almost none of this has been mentioned in the MSM coverage. And the facts certainly don’t trouble the black race advocates and Leftist journalists who are hyping the case:
  • Black radio host Joe Madison called the case a “hate crime” and claims, “In America, we are culturally conditioned to believe that white is superior, black is inferior. The manifestation of that cultural valuing is that black people are undervalued, underestimated and marginalized.”
  • MSNBC’s Al Sharpton, perhaps remembering his glory days of the Crown Heights Riots and Tawana Brawley fraud, told a rally of angry blacks, “Some people said to me in the media — ‘Let me get this straight,’ they said. ‘Reverend, it seems like there’s a lot of people who are angry — are you afraid of violence?’ I said, ‘No. I’m afraid of the violence you already had.’”
“Violence is killing Tray Martin,” Sharpton continued. “Don’t act like we are the ones [who are] violent. We didn’t shoot nobody.” [Sharpton emcees racially-focused Sanford rally, warns against use of violence [!!!], by Matthew Boyle, March 22, 2012]
  • Louis Farrakhan took to his Twitter account to tweet, “Where there is no justice, there will be no peace. Soon the law of retaliation may very well be applied.”
  • Jesse Jackson claimed the shooting proves blacks are under attack. "Targeting, arresting, convicting blacks and ultimately killing us is big business." [Trayvon Martin case: 'Blacks are under attack,' says Jesse Jackson, By Rene Lynch, LA Times, March 23, 2012]
  • MSNBC host and Democratic strategist Karen Finney blamed Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich – among others – for the killing. [Video at Breitbart.com]
These claims are even more jarring given a recent case where the roles were reversed. In 2006, a black Long Island man, John White, shot an unarmed white teen, Daniel Cicciaro, 17, who had come to his house to fight his son. But in December 2010, black New York Governor David Patterson commuted the sentence of White, who had served a mere 5 months for the killing.
None other than Al Sharpton who came to the defense if his co-racialist and applauded Gov. Patterson for letting White off.
Needless to say, this issue remained strictly local—with no marches, rallies or Presidential demands for justice for the unarmed white teen. Paterson commutes sentence of man who killed teen, WABC, December 23, 2010.
This is fundamental question: even if Trayvon Martin were attacked because he was black, why has it become a national issue?
Whites (and other non-blacks) are robbed, raped and murdered by blacks on a daily basis—with barely an eyebrow raised in the Main Stream Media or by politicians and race activists.
In the same time period as the Trayvon Martin incident, a multitude of anti-white attacks by blacks occurred that remained strictly local news.
No Marches For Them?
  • Haley Pettersen, a 15-year-old white girl in a leg cast in O’Fallon, Illinois was out walking her dog when she was attacked by two black girls who said, ‘this is our territory white girl.” One girl grabbed Haley by the hair, and the other one started hitting her in the face. The blacks ran off only when some neighbors came out but the attack left Haley with a swollen left eye. [O’Fallon teen attacked near her home, By Jamie Forsythe, BND.com, March 19, 2012]
  • In Kansas City, an unnamed 50-year-old white man was left with a fractured hip and other injuries after being beaten by a group of blacks shouting racial epithets. [Man Says Youths Beat Him as Part of Racially Motivated Attack, kctv5.com, March 16, 2012]
  • Gary Allder, a white man in San Antonio, came home to find that his house had been burglarized, ransacked and tagged with racial slurs such as “Die Whitey.” Home tagged with racial slurs, profanity; victim offers reward, by Mayra Moreno, KENS 5, March 7, 2012
Die Whitey!
  • Travis Eugene Winemiller, 16, a white Polk County, Florida inmate, was beaten, choked and strangled until he was unconscious by three black inmates. They then hogtied Winemiller and said, “this is how you slave a real cracker” and threatened to kill him. 3 teens charged in jailhouse inmate attack , WTSP.com, February 29, 2012
  • Jacob Appel, a 15-year-old autistic white boy, was attacked by three blacks at his bus stop in Palm Bay, Florida. The blacks taunted, used racial slurs, and chased the victim into the street where he was nearly struck by a car. The only reason the blacks were caught is that one of the attackers posted the video on his Facebook page. Police: 3 charged with hate crime after video shows bullying of autistic teen, wftv.com, February 12, 2012

Unlike the Trayvon Martin shooting, there were clear and obvious signs of racial motivations—for example, racial slurs—in most of these attacks.
Almost all of the black-on-white attacks involved multiple black attackers against white children, the elderly or the handicapped.
Also, unlike the Martin incident, these attacks were strictly local news—and caused no national outrage.
Of course, if President Obama had a son, he would not look like Jacob Appel or Allen Coon. So apparently he did not feel the need to comment on these attacks.
Given Obama’s racially-obsessed history, perhaps he does not feel too bad about these attacks, assuming he knew about them.
There has certainly been no call for “soul searching” from Obama—or the MSM.
But it is worth asking: why do these every-day, black-on-white and black-on-non-black attacks, not register in the national news?
The rule seems to be that the (almost non-existent) combination of black victim and white attacker will always be fair game for national outrage.
But as the U.S. gets more diverse, Asians and Hispanics like Zimmerman seem set take on the role of honorary whites if they attack a black—even in self defense.
Black-on-black crime can be officially, albeit discreetly, deplored.
But blacks must never be cast as the perpetrators of hate crimes—even though they are easily the most prominent perpetrators of racial violence.
And it is in the interest of a lot of people that this double standard persist—until immigration policy overwhelms America’s historic white majority.
Peter Bradley writes from Washington D.C. He can be reached here.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Associated Press and Penn Live: Arrest George Zimmerman for Killing Trayvon Martin, the Law be Damned! Let Zimmerman Prove His Innocence

Here is an interesting article from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ about the latest on the Trayvon Martin shooting case. This follows this post about a Kansas City, MO crime.  . This follows this post about some of the music that was poplular during 2011. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!

http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2012/03/associated-press-and-penn-live-arrest.html


More on the Kansas City, M.O., Hate Crime: ***BUMPED***Black 16/17-Year-Olds Set White 13-Year-Old on Fire in Front of His Own House

Here is an interesting article from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ about a Kansas City, MO crime.  This follows this post about the Trayvon Martin shooting case. This follows this post about some of the music that was poplular during 2011. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!
 

More on the Kansas City, M.O., Hate Crime: Black 16/17-Year-Olds Set White 13-Year-Old on Fire in Front of His Own House; Fox Censors Race,
but Permits Victim’s Mother to Quote Police as Saying It was a “Hate Crime”

Posted by Nicholas Stix



And they say Fox News is “rightwing.”





[Previously, on this case, at WEJB/NSU:



“Now, They’re Burning Our Children Alive: In Kansas City, Two Black 16-Year-Olds Douse 12-Year-Old White Boy with Gasoline, and Set Him on Fire.”]













Boy Set on Fire by Teens in East Side Neighborhood

By Eric Burke

February 28, 2012, at 9:29 p.m.

Updated on March 1, 2012, at 1:43 p.m.

Fox 4 KC



KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A 13-year-old spent some time in the emergency room on Tuesday night as a result of being burned The boy was set on fire by a couple of older teens.



The victim is a student at East High School and regularly walks home after class. When he reached his porch, two older teens grabbed him, pinned his arms behind his back and then poured gas from a gas can on the boy. They then set the boy on fire.



The two boys ran and the teen ripped his shirt over his head and patted the fire out. His parents say they can’t believe it.



“We were told it’s a hate crime,” said the boy’s mother. “They essentially followed him home, they told him he got what he deserved. He’s 13 years old.”



The boy and his parents talked with Kansas City police detectives while he was being treated at Children’s Mercy. His parents hope someone at school will hear about what happened so they can find the teens that set him on fire. They plan to press charges.



[N.S.: What about the DA’s office? Why aren’t criminal justice officials talking about pressing charges?]



The family says they’re not sure if or when their son will return to East High School.





* * *



A longtime reader writes:





White kid set on fire by negro youf. And they call us devils.


 

Monday, March 19, 2012

Why The Black Caucus Looks The Other Way On Immigration

A very interesting post from www.Vdare.com about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about the latest attempt to allow MORE immigration. This follows this post about the new congressional districts in Texas being redrawn so that the new seats favor the Democratic party in a Republican state. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants such as the 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso, where President Barack Obama recently bashed immigration enforcement! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

Why The Black Caucus Looks The Other Way On Immigration
[Joe will be in the Terry Anderson Show this Sunday, May 11, 8 p.m. PST. Click here for local stations and web access]
Blogger's Note: Contact the Black Caucus here.Of the dozens of mysteries that surround Congress' adamant avoidance of the immigration issue, none is so bewildering as why the Congressional Black Caucus looks the other way. Mass unskilled immigration has a particularly dramatic impact on their constituents, the most vulnerable of Americans.
When I read a new report by the Children's Defense Fund that found that more black children—about one million—are now living in extreme poverty than ever (a 40% increase since 2000), I was reminded once again of the Black Caucus' extraordinary dereliction of duty.
The Black Caucus has sold out black Americans. Even though black families live in poverty throughout America, the Caucus is content—eager, in fact—to import more poor people who will compete head-to-head for jobs at the lower end of the economic scale.
Legal and illegal immigration has undercut blacks from the jobs they once held in meat plants, service industries, and on construction crews. In many cases those were union jobs that paid good wages with full benefits. Now those jobs go to illegal aliens who work for pennies above the minimum wage.
Yet from the Black Caucus nary a peep is heard.
For an explanation of this betrayal of blacks by blacks, I contacted two experts—one black, Terry Anderson, who hosts California's most popular Sunday evening radio show, and one white, Roy Beck, Executive Director of NumbersUSA.com and author of the excellent book The Case Against Immigration.
Before calling either, I went to the Americans for Better Immigration website to check the Black Caucus immigration voting records.
On the website, Congressmen receive report card grades on amnesty, chain migration, worker protection, etc. The grades are for "Career" votes and "Recent" votes from January 1, 2003.
As an example, Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo has an A+ for both "Career" and "Recent."
Illinois Congressman Luis Gutierrez has an F and F-.
The Black Caucus average grade is F and F. Without question, the Black Caucus votes in support of higher levels of immigration at every opportunity.
I asked Terry Anderson to explain it to me. His explanation:
"Racism, in a word. The disdain and distrust that the Black Caucus has for white America is so great that it is willing to sell the black community out in a heartbeat. The Caucus will take a brown face over a white face any day. If you think for a minute that any Black Caucus member is going to take sides with the all-white immigration reduction leaders, you're dreaming."
Anderson suggested I watch his 1999 Congressional testimony to then Chairman of the Immigration Sub-Committee Texas Rep. Lamar Smith (A+ and B+) and Black Caucus member Texas Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (Grades F and F).
Jackson-Lee tipped her hand at outset by warning the witnesses - who had traveled 2,000 miles to testify about illegal immigration's impact on their daily lives - not to paint immigrants with "a broad brush" and to avoid "bashing."
"We are all God's children; we all come from somewhere," said Jackson-Lee.
Terry Anderson testified that illegal aliens have overwhelmed his once-quiet South Central Los Angeles neighborhood.
Then, referring to the pro-illegal aliens lobbyists, Anderson went on:
"They won't tell you how skilled black workers in Los Angeles can no longer apply their trade. Body and fender, roofers, framers, drywallers, gardeners, and now even truck drivers. They won't dare tell you about all of the race riots in our schools where the blacks are told to take their black asses back to Africa. Even the news media has refused to tell of this while we know that they are aware or it. There is NEVER a mention of all of the billboards in Spanish and how Chevron is now advertising in Spanish on English language TV.
"The illegals won't hire us and won't buy from us. But still our elected black officials won't help us.
"I met once a few years ago with my Congressman, Julian Dixon. He said he would check into it. He has done nothing. What he HAS done is vote against every bill that would help my and his race of people. He now refuses to meet with me.
"We, black Americans are being displaced in Los Angeles. We are being systematically and economically replaced.
"And the next time somebody tells you that the illegals only takes jobs that blacks won't do, just remember that WE were doing those jobs before the illegal got here.
"AND in places of the country where there is not yet a problem with illegals, you can STILL get your grass cut, your dinner served, your dishes bussed and your hotel room cleaned.
"Funny how in those places Americans are doing those jobs."
During the question and answer, Anderson said that "racist" groups like MALDEF, LULAC, MeCHA and La Raza, had Congress' attention.
But, asked Anderson, "Who speaks for us? Who speaks for our children?"
Jackson-Lee had no answer. At the end of the 1999 session, Jackson-Lee approached Anderson with her hand outstretched. "I don't think I'll shake your hand. You're not listening to us," Anderson said.
Roy Beck added his perspective. "You have to remember that the demographics are shifting very fast," said Beck. "At least half of the Black Caucus members represent districts whose make-up is one-third or more Hispanic."
"But," Beck continued, "I just don't think the Black Caucus realizes the full extent of the harm they are doing to blacks. The Black Caucus is vaguely aware but chooses not to dwell on it. The reality may be too painful."
In his book The Case Against Immigration, Beck devoted two chapters to the consequences of mass immigration for blacks.
During our talk, Beck said that the economic fate of black workers during the recent thirty years is the same as it has always been during periods of high immigration: jobs become scarce and wages go down.
"After years of steady improvement, economic and social conditions for blacks citizens have deteriorated substantially since the 1970s," said Beck. (See the recent report by the Economic Policy Institute, "The State of Working America":)
Roy Beck stressed the importance of looking at the Black Caucus failures in a historic light.
"Just as blacks were poised to take advantage of the civil rights laws of the 1960s, the flow of foreign workers to the highest wage cities in the North and West blocked them. The difference between this era and past eras is that black leaders—Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. Du Bois as well as dozens of black preachers, scholars and journalists vehemently denounced the arrival of European, Mexican, Chinese and Japanese workers."
Beck added that the pro-immigration advocacy of white groups adds insult to injury to blacks. "Blacks have already repeatedly been displaced, overwhelmed and intimidated by European immigrants. Now we're asking them to sit still for it again from Mexicans—here illegally, no less?"
Concluded Beck, "Anything that stands in the way of economic and social progress for blacks is not acceptable under any circumstances."
Alas, Anderson and Beck's message has not gotten through to the Black Caucus—especially to Jackson-Lee who has just introduced H.R. 1830, the Earned Legalization and Family Unification Act.
This poisonous bill translates into amnesty, in-state college tuition and, potentially, a long feed at the public trough for lawbreakers.
Terry Anderson knew four years ago that Jackson-Lee wasn't listening.
But he never suspected she was stone deaf.
Joe Guzzardi [email him], an instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, has been writing a weekly newspaper column since 1988. This column is exclusive to VDARE.COM.