Wendy Davis Slams New Texas Law Making Abortion Clinics Bury Aborted Babies Instead of Selling Them

An interesting story from www.lifenews.com about Texas's new abortion laws. This follows this post about Black abortions. For two very interesting books click HERE.
Please follow me here.

Wendy Davis Slams New Texas Law Making Abortion Clinics Bury Aborted Babies Instead of Selling Them

State   Steven Ertelt      Washington, DC

Wendy Davis loves abortion. In fact she must love abortion so much that she is slamming a new Texas law making abortion clinics provide proper burials for aborted babies instead of selling their body parts for profit.

New Texas rules requiring a dignified burial of aborted babies’ bodies will go into effect on Dec. 19, state health officials said this week.
The new rules, introduced in July by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, require that abortion facilities, hospitals and other medical centers either cremate or bury the remains of aborted and miscarried babies. State officials said the rules do not apply to miscarriages or abortions that take place at home.
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
But Wendy Davis is not happy.

Davis, the former Texas state senator and former gubernatorial candidate whose 13-hour filibuster of the Texas abortion bill garnered national attention in 2013, told ATTN: via email:
“Once again, Governor Abbott and his political appointees are demonstrating a greater interest in scoring cheap political points than they are in governing in the best interests of the state. This rule will no doubt create an undue burden on women seeking abortion in our state, yet another thinly veiled attempt to assert a ‘legitimate state interest’ when the real objective is closing off access to constitutionally protected abortion care.”

Never mid that the rules have nothing to do to access to abortion — they only concern what happens after the abortion has claimed the life of the baby.
John Seago, Legislative Director of Texas Right To Life, previously told LifeNews that the rules are strong attempt to restore the dignity to the victims of abortion. However, he noted that they are just one small step toward the ultimate goal of protecting unborn babies’ lives from abortion.
“Texas Right to Life is in favor of the proposed rules to clarify the manner in which abortion clinics handled the bodies of these victims of abortion,” Seago said. “However, Texas Right to Life strongly believes that the pro-life movement must go far beyond simply regulating the disposition and donation of these bodies after abortion. Texas must take positive steps to stop the horrific injustice of elective abortion instead of just regulating the aftermath.”

Editorial: Mexico STILL Meddling in the U.S.

Editorial

One of the reasons that Donald Trump won the presidency was to put America First and to stop foreign domination of the U.S. in trade policies and immigration policies. Among the nations that had been "beating" the U.S. in both of these was Mexico.

Former president of Mexico, Vicente Fox, has been one of the biggest advocates of Mexican meddling.

A recent example of this can be seen here:  http://www.vdare.com/posts/unhinged-vicente-fox-rants-again-about-donald-trump-calls-trump-illegitimate-president-who-didnt-won-sic-the-general-election

A timely post from www.vdare.com about GOP Hispanic lobbyists. This follows this post about criminal mayors in the U.S. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can follow me here.

A WSJ story from 1999--but it's "The Current Year"

<

Among Victims Left Behind On Trump’s Bloody Path To The Presidency—GOP Hispanic Consultants. They Deserve It.

>

---

Allan Wall

Prior to the Trump Triumph, we were constantly told by the so-called experts that a successful Republican candidate needed a big portion of the Hispanic vote, which could only be obtained by surrendering on illegal immigration and campaigning in Spanish. The “experts” included the Main Stream Media (always eager to “help” the GOP), the Republican leadership, and well-paid political consultants, especially Hispanic political consultants.
Trump ignored all of this. He didn’t even have a Spanish language section on his website. As Trump declared during the GOP primaries, standing next to Jeb Bush: “This is a country where we speak English, not Spanish.”[RCP, September 16, 2015]
And not only did Trump win, he apparently got a few more percentage points of the Hispanic vote than Mitt Romney: 29% vs 27% according to CNN.
This is disputed by Gary Segura and Matt Barreto, who run the Latino Decisions website—and who, coincidentally, worked for Hillary. They claim Hillary Clinton garnered 79% of the Latino vote, which would be better than Obama did four years ago.  [Lies, Damn Lies, and Exit Polls, Latino Decisions, November 10, 2016] They also assert that Trump only got 18% of the Latino vote: In record numbers, Latinos voted overwhelmingly against Trump. We did the research, by Gabriel Sanchez and Matt Barreto, Washington Post, November 11, 2016]. But others on the Left disagree: Harry Enten disputes Latino Decision’s figures—Trump Probably Did Better With Latino Voters Than Romney Did  FiveThirtyEight, November 18, 2016.
But the bottom line: there was not some overwhelming African American-style Latino vote that prevented Trump’s victory.
In other words, among the many victims left behind on Trump’s bloody path to the Presidency was the entire industry of GOP Hispanic consultants.
What about Trump’s own Hispanic advisers? They fared little better.
The “National Hispanic Advisory Council for Trump” was a joint creation of the campaign and the political geniuses at the Republican National Committee. It was “a diverse group of national Hispanic leaders who are advising the campaign and sharing Mr. Trump’s proposals with the Hispanic community” .[RNC And Trump Campaign Meet With National Hispanic Advisory Council For Trump, GOP, August 20, 2016]
Trump, interestingly, assigned them the task of finding “humane, efficient” ways of dealing with illegal immigration [Trump to Hispanic Advisors: Find ‘Humane, Efficient’ Ways to Address Illegal Immigration, by Todd Beamon, Newsmax, August 20, 2016]. But why would Hispanic advisers necessarily be experts on that question?
It didn’t really matter. Within two weeks, after Trump’s speech on immigration policy in Phoenix, members of this group were publicly bailing out and condemning Trump.
Needless to say, the result was an MSM frenzy, with members of the group lovingly quoted.

Jacob Monty [Email him] an immigration lawyer (!) from Houston who had acted as spokesman, gave several more interviews, with lots of quotes bashing Trump.

• “I couldn’t be part of the charade.  I didn’t want to be responsible of leading people astray” [Donald Trump’s Immigration Speech Backfires Among Hispanic Republicans by Priscilla Alvarez, Atlantic, September 1, 2016].
• (On Facebook) “I gave Donald TRUMP a Plan that would improve border security, remove hardened criminal aliens and most importantly give work authority to the millions of honest, hardworking immigrants in the US. He rejected that tonight and so I must reject him… Tonight he was not a Republican but a populist, modern day Father Coughlin who demonized immigrants . He must want to lose…. “Trump’s Hispanic Advisers Ditch Him Over Hard-Right Immigration Plan (Subtitle: “One suggested that Trump might not even want to win”) by Elise Foley, Huffington Post, September 2, 2016
• “There was hope yesterday when he went to Mexico. He looked like a president. He looked like somebody who was trying to solve the problem. For him to turn and just disregard everything we talked about a week-a-half ago and just recite the talking points from FAIR and Numbers USA [two organizations that favor restrictive immigration policies], that was disappointing.” [Trump speech costs him backing of Texas Hispanic advisers by Jonathan Tilove, Austin American-Statesman, September 1, 2016]
• [Several Hispanic Trump surrogates reconsider support Katie Glueck and Kyle Cheney, Politico, September 1, 2016]

One Ramiro Pena, a pastor in Waco, dropped off the group and said, “I am so sorry but I believe Mr. Trump lost the election tonight”. [Some members of Trump’s Hispanic advisory board consider pulling support  by Reena Flores, CBS, September 1, 2016]
Grace Flores Hughes [Email her] a former Bush I official (and the woman who invented the term “Hispanic”) stated: “As long as he continues with this sort of rhetoric, no, none of us are going to support him. He’s too right-wing. The majority of people who are here illegally are here to seek a better life. The majority of them are good, hardworking, honest people. I think we need to concentrate on that and talk about that”. [Donald Trump’s ‘Hispanic Advisory Council’ is falling apart after his brutal immigration speech by Casey Tolan, Fusion, September 1, 2016]
Massey Villarreal, [Email him] former president of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and national Republican Hispanic Assembly, called the Trump speech “awful” and said: “As a compassionate conservative, I am disappointed with the immigration speech. I am no longer supporting Trump for president…” .[Austin American-Statesman]
And Rick Figueroa, [Email him] an investment executive also quoted in the Statesman piece, complained Trump had ignored “wise counsel” and stated: “I am very disappointed in Mr. Trump’s immigration mistake. It was a leadership mistake. It was a political mistake. It was a moral mistake.”
What no one explained, and apparently were not asked: why these Hispanic “conservative” advisers went along with Trump until this speech, only to showily betray him afterward. Do they not want Americans to have a sane immigration policy? Or do they simply identify more with the Latino movement than the historic American nation?
Either way, they didn’t do much for Trump except bring bad press.
Meanwhile, on the Democratic side, Latinos were supposed to save the election for Clinton/Kaine. And the ticket flagrantly appealed to them on the basis of ethnic solidarity. On November 3rd, just days before the election, Tim Kaine gave a “historic” speech in Phoenix—‘historic” because it was entirely in Spanish. The New York Times crowed Well, Señor Kaine, Hablaste Español Muy Bien (“Well, Mr. Kaine, You Spoke Spanish Very Well”) [by Fernanda Santos, New York Times, November 3, 2016].
Still, the audience was only 150 people. The New York Times said it was:

 “…a mix of elected officials, community activists, immigration advocates, union leaders and teachers wearing T-shirts that read “Educators for Hillary” and “Families Fighting Back.”

Hardly a mass movement. All the speakers at the rally spoke in Spanish, including a candidate for the state legislature, and Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez. (Pictured right.)
The Times didn’t report, but Breitbart did: in his speech

Sen. Tim Kaine cheered the demographic transformation of the United States caused by the nation’s federal immigration policies, telling his Latino audience on Thursday, “You are the future of America.” “By 2050, communities of color will represent the majority of our population,” Kaine said.
“So, of course, Latinos will help shape the future of America because you are the future of America.”
[Tim Kaine Cheers End of White Majority in Spanish Address, By Julia Hahn, Breitbart, November 5, 2016]

So in a foreign tongue, an American senator essentially mocked the American people being driven into minority status by its own government.
Significantly, this treasonous pandering seems to have backfired:

On Monday, Clinton and Trump were in a virtual tie when the Clinton campaign announced that Democratic Presidential nominee Tim Kaine would be giving the first ever presidential campaign speech in Spanish. Clinton actually held a 0.6 percentage point lead, according to an average of state polls compiled by Real Clear Politics. But by Friday, a day after Kaine’s speech in Phoenix, Trump had overtaken her and extended his lead to a more established 4 percentage points.
Tim Kaine’s Spanish rally in Phoenix didn’t help Clinton’s numbers in Arizona, [by  Franco Ordoñez, Sun Herald, November 4, 2016.]

And, on November 8th, Trump carried Arizona with its 11 electoral votes, by a margin of 3 and a half points.
What this shows: as I have repeatedly said on VDARE.com, pandering to Latinos as Latinos will not help the GOP win votes. Trump’s appeal to civic nationalism shows the correct approach.
Note that Trump’s relative success with Latinos came despite a massive propaganda campaign labeling Trump and his supporters as enemies of all Hispanics.
So why did these Hispanics vote for Trump? Is it because they think he can improve the economy? Do they admire Trump’s leadership qualities? Do they explicitly vote based on conservative principles? Do they identify with the historic American nation? Or all of the above and more?
It doesn’t matter. It’s because Hispanic-Americans who think of themselves as Americans first will respond if they are approached as Americans.
But that means cutting out the “GOP Hispanic political consultants” who have long claimed that recycled progressivism and Open Borders will somehow win over La Raza supporters back from the Democrats, and that appealing to American patriotism would somehow alienate Hispanics even further.
The results are now in. The “GOP Hispanic political consultants” were utterly, totally and completely wrong.
American citizen Allan Wall (email him) moved back to the U.S.A. in 2008 after many years residing in Mexico. Allan`s wife is Mexican, and their two sons are bilingual. In 2005, Allan served a tour of duty in Iraq with the Texas Army National Guard. His VDARE.COM articles are archived here; his Mexidata.info articles are archived here ; his News With Views columns are archived here; and his website is here.

Black Lives Matter? 35% of Aborted Babies are Black Even Though Blacks are 13% of the Population

An interesting story from www.lifenews.com about Black abortions. This follows this post about Senate appointment procedures. This follows this post about Planned Parenthood's current plans. For two very interesting books click HERE.
Please follow me here.

Black Lives Matter? 35% of Aborted Babies are Black Even Though Blacks are 13% of the Population

National   Steven Ertelt, Micaiah Bilger     Washington, DC

As LifeNews.com reported last week, a new Centers for Disease Control report shows good news across the country as abortions and abortion rates continue to drop to historic levels.

The CDC released its 2013 abortion surveillance report on Wednesday, showing a 5 percent drop in abortions from 2012 and a 20 percent drop since 2004. The CDC data, which is incomplete because the government does not require states to report abortion numbers, reported 664,435 abortions in 47 states in 2013. The abortion rate was 12.5 abortions per 1,000 women ages 15-44.

In comparison to 2012, the new data indicates that about 34,500 fewer babies lost their lives to abortion in 2013.

But the good news does not extend to the African-American Community. That’s because the percentage of abortions done on black babies continues to be at alarming levels. The new CDC report makes it clear that even though black Americans constitute just 13% of the US population 35% of the babies killed in abortions are black babies.

CNS News has more on the shocking percentages from the latest CDC report:

Although black Americans make up 13.3% of the U.S. population, they comprised 35% of the total abortions “reported” – 128,682 babies killed — in 2013, according to the latest Abortion Surveillance report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
That number, 128,682 black abortions, comes from only 29 reporting areas, according to the CDC. It does not include black abortions from the following states: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
According to the CDC, there were 664,435 abortions total – white, black, Hispanic, other — reported in 2013 from 49 reporting areas. But that number does not include abortions from California, Maryland and New Hampshire.
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter. Follow @LifeNewsHQ
For those abortions known by race, in addition to the 128,682 black babies killed, there were 134,814 white babies, or 37.3% of the total reporting. Whites make up 77.1% of the population, according to the Census Bureau.
For Hispanics, who comprise 17.6% of the U.S. population, there were 68,761 abortions reported, which was 19% of the total.

The Associated Press reports the CDC has not recorded a lower abortion rate since 1971, two years before the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Roe v. Wade and its companion case Doe v. Bolton, which allowed for legalized abortion on demand through all nine months of pregnancy. In 1971, several states had legalized abortion; but it was not legal throughout the U.S.
Abortion rates have been dropping steadily in the past several years as pro-lifers worked to pass a historic number of pro-life laws in states across the country. Pregnancy resource centers and sidewalk counselors also have been playing an integral role, offering pregnant and parenting families resources and information to empower them to choose life for their unborn babies.

Editorial: Impeach James Comey? Loretta Lynch?

Editorial


First, you should contact your Representative and DEMAND impeachment against these two, James Comey, and Loretta Lynch.
http://ziplook.house.gov/htbin/findrep?ZIP=


Of course you should vote AGAINST Hillary Clinton, if for no other reason than her privilege of being above the laws, particularly the Espionage Act.


Finally, you should brace for the likelihood that Impeachment doesn't happen and Hillary does STEAL the election, including with the votes of the illegal aliens that she will get. If the count was only with legal U.S. citizens, Donald would win, but with voter fraud, including banning voter ID and also allowing "dead people" to vote, his landslide win could be stolen from him.



http://www.vdare.com/posts/hillary-clinton-too-big-to-jail-but-not-too-big-to-impeach


The seismic stress on American institutions caused by nation-breaking immigration will ultimately have to be relieved by impeachment—of legislating judges, of public officials, of Presidents. The Stupid Party, of course, has reacted stupidly, not noticing that Democrats regularly discuss impeachment when they think they might benefit


It’s a vulgar error to think that impeachment is only appropriate in the case of a crime, as I explained here. But Hillary Clinton quite clearly has committed a crime.