A timely post from www.NumbersUSA.com analyzing Barack Obama's amnesty stance and other anti-American actions taken by him. This follows this post about immigration's cost and this post about the MURDER of ROBERT KRENTZ, who the protestors and boycotters won't give a solution for, but will call Americans racist for trying to prevent another MURDER, and this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso. For more interesting stories like this click here to follow this blog.
Fight Obama's anti-Arizona lawsuit
FRIENDS, LET'S COME TO THE AID OF ARIZONA & OF UNEMPLOYED WORKERS EVERYWHERE. REGISTER YOUR PROTEST AGAINST THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL FILING SUIT TO OVERTURN ARIZONA'S NEW IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT LAW.
You can read all our latest news and blogs about the federal government attack on Arizona on our NumbersUSA home page.
ACTIONS: You can send free faxes of protest against the U.S. Attorney General's actions.
Go to your customized Action Board to send free faxes to:
U.S. Att. Gen. Holder
Pres. Obama
Your 3 Members of Congress
Perhaps the most frightening -- and shocking -- part of Atty. Gen. Holder's lawsuit against Arizona's new immigration enforcement law is his indication that it is a waste of federal resources to pick up illegal aliens simply because they are unlawfully taking a job from a U.S. worker.
Most Americans look at the terrible unemployment situation and assume that it would be a good thing for their federal government to be removing illegal aliens from their jobs in order to put unemployed Americans back to work.
But protecting U.S. workers apparently is a waste of government resources in our Attorney General's eyes.
Atty. Gen. Holder said:
" . . . diverting federal resources away from dangerous aliens such as terrorism suspects and aliens with criminal records will impact the entire country's safety."
What is scaring Holder?
Well, the new Arizona law will cause a lot more illegal foreign workers to be identified by police who will try to turn them over to the feds for processing.
But Holder doesn't want to have to handle these illegal workers.
His statement indicates that the only illegal aliens the feds should handle are "terrorism suspects and aliens with criminal records."
Of course, most of us would consider that every illegal alien has a criminal record just from having broken immigration laws. But we can be sure that Holder does not see it that way. He suggests that the Obama Administration has devoted so little resources to illegal immigration that any effort to remove illegal workers will mean fewer violent illegal aliens will be removed.
During this Jobs Depression, shouldn't Holder be concentrating on both criminal aliens and illegal workers?
It seems that at least once a week, the Obama Administration indicates that unemployment is not an especially big problem or priority. This lawsuit against Arizona and the arguments made in its support are among the most callous toward unemployed Americans.
Join the discussion about the lawsuit by clicking here.
It is very important for Democrats in Congress to understand that the Obama Administration's constant attacks on the state of Arizona are going to politically hurt Democrats running in fall elections. We know that many Democrats are already distancing themselves from the Administration, and we want to see many more do so.
You don't have to just stew at home as you think about the federal attack on Arizona. NumbersUSA always tries to offer constructive ways for you to vent your opinions quickly and for free.
Posts
Moscow: Soviet Russia in the 1960s - British Pathé
-
Sep 24, 2020 | Enhanced in-car footage of Moscow, USSR in 1965.
27 minutes ago
1 comment:
I hope that every American, regardless of where he lives, will stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents. This Nation was founded by men of many nations and backgrounds. It was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened. All of us ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his children to be treated, but this is not the case.
I know the proponents of this law say that the majority approves of this law, but the majority is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we listen to the majority of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, housing, restaurants, hotels, retail stores, schools, colleges and yes water fountains) if we listen to the majority of the day? We all know the answer, a resounding, NO!
Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics and do what is right, not what is just popular with the majority. Some men comprehend discrimination by never have experiencing it in their lives, but the majority will only understand after it happens to them.
Post a Comment