Showing posts with label Andrew Cuomo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Cuomo. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Are Deadly Infections an Indicator of Worse to Come?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about diseases. This follows this post about Halloween. This follows this post about Supreme Court nominees. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.


Are Deadly Infections an Indicator of Worse to Come?





Printer-friendly version


Doctors and hospitals are increasingly sobered by deadly new strains of "superbugs" that are largely invulnerable to today's most potent antibiotics. Is it possible we could we see epidemics of incurable infections?

A spilled bottle of medication/pills.
Source: Thinkstock
Almost lost in the deluge of news of advancements in the medical world is the revelation of new strains of bacteria that challenge all we have learned over the past century about fighting disease organisms.
A strain of antibiotic-resistant bacteria known medically as carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae, or CRE, has jumped to the forefront of the medical world's attention due to one very disturbing fact—their near-total resistance to an entire family of drugs known as carbapenum antibiotics makes them nearly impossible to treat once they infect a patient.
Emerging recently in hospitals and nursing homes, they attack the most vulnerable—weaker and elderly patients. And once they get a foothold in a hospital or nursing home, they are virtually unstoppable.
In the face of these and other rising health threats on a national and global scale, we need to consider what's happening and where our primary focus should be.

"Nightmare superbugs"

No less an authority than the renowned Centers for Disease Control and Prevention refers to these lethal bacteria in terms not normally used in the staid medical world. CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden, in a March 6, 2013, USA Today story, says these "nightmare superbugs" present a triple threat. "They're resistant to nearly all antibiotics. They have high mortality rates, killing nearly half of people with serious infections. And they can spread their resistance to other bacteria," Frieden said.
What worries Dr. Frieden and so many others is that antibiotics known to the medical world today have virtually no effect on these superbugs. He and other bacteriologists fear it may be too late to stop their onslaught, which has killed up to 70 percent of patients infected by CRE. Doctors fear they are running out of options to slow or stop the spread.
Friedan warned that the United States has only a "narrow window of opportunity" to take action before it is too late to halt the spread of the bacteria. He envisions a scenario in which antibiotics could become powerless against such common ailments as diarrhea and respiratory and urinary tract infections.
Thus far, CRE infections have been reported in 42 states. As of late last year, about 4 percent of U.S. hospitals had reported at least one case of CRE infection, with that rate jumping to 18 percent among acute-care hospitals.
Even such renowned facilities as the National Institutes of Health's Clinical Center near Washington, D.C., are not immune. Last summer a CRE strain struck the center where it killed seven, including a 16-year-old boy. And there have been worse outbreaks.
Intensive care patients seem to be at the greatest risk, especially those on ventilators or hooked up to central intravenous catheters. Organ transplant patients and those undergoing chemotherapy seem particularly vulnerable. And health officials fear that continued mutation of CRE bacteria could produce varieties that could make even common infections virtually untreatable.
We report this not to dissuade readers from seeking needed medical care, but to increase awareness of the problem. All of us must consider what's happening in the world and exercise wisdom.

Unexpected effects stymie experts

What has brought this alarming state of affairs?
Medical observers have noted that the overuse of certain antibiotics in hospitals and nursing homes has had an unexpected effect: Many of the Enterobacteriaceae have become resistant to most of the antibiotics in general use today. As a result, where just over a decade ago only 1.2 percent of bacteria were antibiotic-resistant, today that number has grown to about 4.4 percent. Ironically, the bugs have become resistant to the very carbapenum antibiotics developed as an answer to weaker earlier antibiotics.
"This has been bred in hospitals and nursing homes because of the way we use antibiotics," said Dr. Carlos Nunez, chief medical officer for CareFusion, a company which markets an infection surveillance system used in many hospitals. "You go to a place where you are supposed to get better and you get an infection where you have a 50 percent chance of dying. It's a nightmare scenario."
The pathogens'ability to survive and become resistant to antibiotics has stymied medical experts. Overuse of antibiotics to kill CRE in past years has produced strains of drug-resistant germs that not only survive, but are able to pass along survival traits to other bacteria found in hospitals.
The growing alarm over the CRE threat has placed hospitals and nursing homes on the defensive. CRE can be transferred from patients to the environment and to the hands of the care providers, such as doctors or nurses, when care providers touch patients or touch them with medical equipment, then touch other patients. To counter this, stricter enforcement of hand washing has become required practice in medical facilities.
Procedures in many hospitals now call for patients considered high-risk for CREs to get special screenings on arrival. Hospital officials now warn hospital visitors to wash their hands thoroughly and insist that anyone who touches them also wash their hands.
CRE infection of a patient triggers additional precautions to reduce the likelihood of its spread to other patients. Under the use of "contact precautions," patients are essentially quarantined, transferred to separate rooms to which the patient is confined and from which visitors are barred. Nurses and other caretakers can be required to wear gloves and gowns each time they enter the room.

Old diseases on the return

For more than a century, America and the Western world have made what seemed to be unstoppable progress on the road to eradicating sickness and disease. One by one through the decades, such dreaded maladies as smallpox, yellow fever, whooping cough and tuberculosis began to disappear as medical research discovered their causes and ways to prevent them.
The 20th century featured a parade of medical advances. One by one, diseases that plagued mankind for centuries fell before the advances of medical science.
Major milestones were the discovery in 1900 of the cause of yellow fever by two U.S. Army doctors, Walter Reed and James Carroll. The 1920s saw the development of vaccines for whooping cough, diphtheria and tuberculosis, and the uses of insulin to treat diabetes. Dr. Jonas Salk astounded the medical world in 1955 with his discovery of a vaccine to prevent polio, which had paralyzed millions. Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella followed in the 1960s, as did heart and other organ transplants.
And while some diseases, such as cancer and heart disease, have not been stopped, medical science has made great strides in treatment. Survival rates for cancer have improved tremendously since 1960.
A 2009 survey in the United Kingdom showed five-year survival rates for leukemia, prostate, melanoma and several other common cancers to be as high as 84 percent. U.S. five-year survival rates for bladder cancer are as high as 80 percent, and more than 50 percent for lung cancer. Aggressive treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation, and surgery as a last resort, have resulted in cures or partial cures for millions.
But are we now beginning to see a reversal of that trend? Are we starting to lose ground, even retreat, in the face of illnesses where bacteria and other microorganisms mutate to the point they become resistant to the vaccines and antibiotics of modern medical science?
Tuberculosis, once thought to be nearly eradicated, is making a comeback among some sectors of the U.S. population, according to series of recent reports. A current CDC fact sheet reported on the rise of "multi-drug resistant tuberculosis," which seems to be on the rise among many immigrant groups.
These strains of TB have developed resistance to all of the most effective TB drugs, leaving patients the only option, in the bland wording of the report, "to pursue treatment options that are much less effective."
Once thought to be eradicated, scarlet fever has recently been found to be on the increase. The discovery of penicillin in 1943 did much to virtually eliminate the disease, which ravaged America in the 18th and 19th centuries in massive outbreaks. But a new, more virulent form resistant to penicillin has arisen, and outbreaks have occurred in China, where reported cases tripled in 2011. A flurry of new cases broke out in Michigan last year, concentrated among immigrant communities.

Where is our trust?

It's time that all of us start doing some serious reflection and assessment. We might ask whether we've taken modern "wonder drugs" for granted, assuming that science will always find a solution for our problems. Does your Bible have anything to say about this?
Notice the words of Moses to ancient Israel: "If you do not carefully observe all the words of this law that are written in this book . . . then the Lord will bring upon you and your descendants extraordinary plagues—great and prolonged plagues—and serious and prolonged sicknesses . . . all the diseases of Egypt . . . Also every sickness and every plague . . . will the Lord bring upon you until you are destroyed" (Deuteronomy:28:58-61).
Moses also warned of incurable illnesses as punishment for national sins earlier in this passage: "The Lord will strike you with the boils of Egypt, with tumors, and with the scab, and with the itch, from which you cannot be healed" (verse 27). That last phrase strikes a familiar chord with our situation today.
Increasingly, medical issues take the forefront of our concerns. Millions in the Western world, especially those entering late middle age and older, spend more time concerned about the effects of illnesses and what will happen if they have to go into a hospital.
But the God who designed and created the human body has some good news for us. He forgives and heals! Of course, this requires turning to Him and following His ways. Still, the timing remains up to Him. In some cases, He will deliver us immediately. But even if He does not completely heal right now—as He knows what is ultimately best for all of us—He nevertheless has a plan in place that will eradicate sickness and disease forever.
Notice this good news in Revelation:21:4: "'He will wipe away every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death' or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away" (New International Version). And even prior to that, a time is coming when the earth, under the reign of Jesus Christ, will be largely free of pain, sickness and disease. Not only will hospital-born killer germs be eliminated, but there will no longer be a need for hospitals themselves.
If this sounds too fantastic to be true, read the Bible study aids, Why Does God Allow Suffering? and The Road to Eternal Life . You'll find the Bible has much more to say about the scourge of disease.
Nobody has commented yet. Be the first to kick off the discussion!
Login/Register to post comments

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Warning: Illegal aliens move to conquer Florida--you must intercede

A very interesting post from www.alipac.us about an attempt to allow in-state tuition in Florida at taxpayer expense. This follows this post about the Border Patrol being hindered in their job. REMEMBER, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.
You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!

Warning: Illegal aliens move to conquer Florida--you must intercede

by
         
1 Comment Comments
Warning all national ALIPAC Activists!

Today we need everyone in every state focused on an emergency situation in Florida where the illegal aliens and their supporters are advancing a bill to grant in-state tuition for illegal immigrants with the backing of turncoat Republicans working with a majority of Democrats again!

ALIPAC had led the charge in the states and has defeated bills like this in 20 states, but two years ago we had to drop our state level activism due to severe budget restraints imposed by our supporters. Since then, illegal aliens have racked up win after win in the states, gaining licenses and in-state tuition in more than 10 new states!

Even though we have a long list of candidates waiting on our help and numerous other battles to fight, today we must intercede in Florida in the hopes of breaking the momentum of the advancing army of illegal aliens in our 3rd most populous American state! We cannot let the illegals win in Florida as that would tip the entire nation to their cause. We cannot let Florida follow California into the abyss.

Surprising good news out of New York State where local activists on our side and Republican lawmakers stopped the state level Dream Act Amnesty legislation!
http://www.alipac.us/content/dream-act-killed-new-york-state-senate-2744/


NOW IF WE CONVINCE THOUSANDS OF YOU TO DEDICATE 30 Minutes of VOLUNTEER ACTIVISM TO THIS EMAIL WE CAN WIN IN FLORIDA TOO AND PERHAPS TURN THE TIDE IN FAVOR OF AMERICANS ONCE AGAIN IN THE STATES!

Read this then take action!

FL - Anti-Illegal Immigration Group: Don't Let Illegal Immigrants Pay In-State College Tuitionhttp://www.alipac.us/content/fl-anti...e-tuitio-2741/


Step 1:
Call Florida Governor Rick Scott and tell him how disappointed you are over his support for in-state tuition taxpayer benefits for illegal aliens, especially after he had promised everyone he would crack down on illegal immigration when he was campaigning. Remember to use your own version of ALIPAC's sample message.

CONTACT NUMBER FOR GOVERNOR SCOTT - (850) 488-7146

"I'm calling to tell Governor Scott how disappointed and angry I am at his support for taxpayer benefits like in-state tuition for illegal aliens. He promised to crack down on illegal immigration and now he is helping illegal immigrants and encouraging more illegal immigration through his unfortunate support for HB 851! Florida taxpayers should not be forced to pay more in taxes to replace American students with illegal immigrants in the limited seats in our full capacity colleges! Tell Governor Scott to stop helping illegal aliens and stop HB 851 now!"

Step 2:
Then access the contact list for the Florida State House (Yes even if you do not live in Florida, Americans in Florida need your help today)

Contact List for Florida State House
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/representatives.aspx


Dedicate yourself to calling and then writing as many Florida State Representatives as possible in random order. Please use your distinctive version of ALIPAC's strategic message that has defeated in-state tuition for illegals in more than 20 states. Remember to call, call, call, then write as calls are your most effective persuasion tool. Leave voice messages where no human answers.

"I'm calling to ask Representative _______ to oppose the in-state tuition for illegal aliens bill HB 851. In-state tuition for illegal immigrants will encourage more illegal immigration into Florida and America while forcing Florida taxpayers to pay taxpayer benefits to illegal aliens to replace their own students in Universities that already turn thousands of Americans and legal immigrants away each year! HB 851 will harm American students and taxpayers while encouraging more illegal immigration."

We need a full national mobilization to the aid of Americans in Florida today and our friends at FLIMEN (Floridians for Immigration Enforcement) fighting to stop the illegal alien advance by stopping HB 851.

Call today and each day and do the best you can until you hear word from us letting you know if the illegal alien invasion supporters or Americans like us have won in the critical battleground state of Florida!

Let's roll, Americans!


William Gheen and The ALIPAC Team
www.alipac.us
www.againstamnesty.com
www.illegalimmigration.com

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Border Patrol Union: ACLU Trying to ‘Limit Effectiveness’ of Border Patrol

 very interesting post from www.alipac.us about the Border Patrol being hindered in their job. This follows this post about an attempt to drastically increase immigration.  REMEMBER, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.
You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!

Border Patrol Union: ACLU Trying to ‘Limit Effectiveness’ of Border Patrol



The El Paso Times gave near carte blanche to the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Texas chapter in their efforts to attack the men and women who serve along the dangerous U.S./Mexico border in an article titled, “ACLU of Texas: Border Patrol, CBP Need More Scrutiny” on March 14, 2014.

Teri Burke, the executive director of the ACLU Texas was trumpeted by the El Paso Times article, "We believe somebody really needs to put their feet to the fire," said Terri Burke, executive director of the organization.” The left-leaning paper quoted Burke further as stating, "If your local police department had shot and killed 22 people, you would be asking question.”

by Brandon Darby 15 Mar 2014, 9:04 AM PDT
breitbart

The El Paso Times’ writer, Daniel Borunda, then wrote, “The U.S. Border Patrol is under scrutiny by immigrant and civil-rights groups regarding deadly shootings in response to rock throwing on the Mexican border.”

The article from the El Paso Times could easily be dismissed as simply being skewed against Border Patrol agents. However, a look into the context their article exists within reveals it to play a role in a larger effort to attack Border Patrol readiness and effectiveness with half-truths.

I contacted the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) for Breitbart Texas and spoke with NBPC Vice President Shawn Moran. He stated, “We did research and found the most comparable group to the U.S. Border Patrol in terms of numbers is the LAPD and the LA County Sheriff’s Department. We are actually slightly larger than those two agencies.” He added, “In 2012, they shot and killed 48 people, compared to our 22—but we had many more arrests than they did.”

Vice President Moran said that the U.S. Border Patrol having higher arrest numbers, while fewer incidents of having to use deadly force than the comparable agencies in the Los Angeles area, demonstrated that the men and women of the U.S. Border Patrol “use force in a very controlled manner.”

“This is a political attack by special interests groups and the ACLU to limit the effectiveness of Border Patrol. The ACLU is going after low hanging fruit, they’ve seen the agency back down in the past,” said Vice President Moran.

“We are concerned that all of this political criteria is going to make agents hesitate and second guess themselves when they are in a situation where they need to defend themselves—this could absolutely lead to a loss of life for US law enforcement,” said Vice President Moran.

I have written extensively on efforts by left-of-center advocacy groups connected to the ACLU that would ultimately lead to Border Patrol agents being incapable of protecting the U.S. border with Mexico. In a November 6, 2013 article titled, “Border Patrol Agents Retain Right to Defend Themselves,” I outlined the overall strategy by the ACLU and other groups in attacking the men and women of the U.S. Border Patrol. I wrote:

The ACLU, along with the academics and previously politically-appointed law enforcement brass from the nonprofit Police Executive Research Forum, sought to prevent the U.S. Border Patrol and their parent agency, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), from using deadly force in response to rock attacks and suspects using vehicles to attack agents.

In that case, as in this matter, an argument was being framed under the guise of insisting the Border Patrol should “live up to the same standards larger, metropolitan police forces must meet.” Larger forces in metropolitan areas operate under very different circumstances, a fact the ACLU and their allies did not acknowledge in their ongoing media blitz against the Border Patrol. City law enforcement has backup nearby, can radio for help that soon arrives, and do not operate in remote areas. Border Patrol agents are often alone in remote regions, their radios often do not work due to communications infrastructure, and backup is usually unable to arrive quickly—even if their radios did work. By defining the differing protocol between agencies as “standards” and falsely insisting that Border Patrol agents were substandard by having much needed, though different, guidelines and protocols, the ACLU and their allies sought to turn public opinion against border law enforcement.

The likely result of reducing Border Patrol agents’ ability to respond to deadly attacks with deadly force would have been an ever increasing series of gaps in the U.S./Mexico border. Why would a solitary Border Patrol agent venture out into remote regions where his/her radio did not work—where backup could not be called upon—if the agent were left unable to use deadly force in self-defense? The simple truth is that Border Patrol agents would no longer go to those regions. They would be left wide open—even more so than they are already—with coyotes, cartel-led drug and human traffickers, and any other person desiring to enter into the U.S. illegally knowing there would exist regions with zero presence of U.S. law enforcement personnel. In the rare event that a Border Patrol agent were present, such criminal elements would know to attack with rocks and boulders and that the Border Patrol agent would be left defenseless.