Showing posts with label DACA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DACA. Show all posts

Friday, June 24, 2016

“Trump Effect” Works On Supreme “Court”—Priest-Kings Flinch On Obamnesty, But Not Anti-White Discrimination

A timely post from http://www.vdare.com about the Supreme Court. This follows this post about Barack Obama fighting "violent extremism" instead of ISLAMIC TERROR.  This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can
follow me here.



Supreme-Court-usurpation

“Trump Effect” Works On Supreme “Court”—Priest-Kings Flinch On Obamnesty, But Not Anti-White Discrimination


Today the squad of Priest-Kings laughably called the Supreme “Court” (which is actually America’s senior legislative body) demonstrated their top 2016 priority: avoiding a President Trump.
They split 4-4 on President Obama’s Executive Amnesty, meaning the 5th Circuit decision striking it down stands.
But they upheld “Affirmative Action” – anti-white discrimination in University admissions. Here the vote was 4-3 because Commissar Kagan was obliged to recuse herself.
The Obamnesty ruling has triggered tantrums by the Illegal Lobby and Obama has had to put himself in a bad light by arrogantly promising to continue not enforcing immigration laws. But given the Court’s political objective, it was sensible. Amnesty is wildly unpopular amongst white Americans, which is why the subject was carefully avoided in the 2014 election. Immigration enforcement has been Trump’s strongest card. Stirring these people up is a bad idea. As it is they may go back to sleep under the illusion that the Court has prevented this act of despotism. (Actually the ruling only applies to the 5th Circuit and another challenge could easily reach the Court at a more convenient time.)
Furthermore freeing the Presidency even more from restraint is very unappealing if the President might be called something like Trump. As I noted in WASHINGTON POST (!!!) Denounces Obamnesty: “Unprecedented…Unjustified” this fear existed in thinking Leftist circles even before Trump.
Sadly, upholding the principle that white Americans may be discriminated against in the country their ancestors built also reflects the Trump Effect. Trump has shown no interest in the issue and early on in an interview ruled the subject out. So the Priest-Kings had no fear.
With Kagan not voting, useful idiot Anthony Kennedy had to be drafted in to make up a majority. If Trump had not been in the offing, he would probably have been utilized to affirm Obamnesty too.
The split on the Obamnesty case was three Jews and one Hispanic versus four Catholics. Ethnic animosities and ambitions are what motivate the Court, causing me to ask Can Free Speech (And America) Survive A Minority-Dominated Supreme Court? The answer to this is definitely going to be NO, especially as long as the policy of Supreme “Court” Priest-Kingships: No White Protestant Need Apply is enforced.

Monday, May 16, 2016

Editorial: Bathroom Laws as a Distraction? Or as more of the Same?

Editorial

The bathroom law issue is the latest one that the President is using to distract from his non-enforcement of immigration laws, as well as flooding the U.S. with Syrian, and now Cuban, refugees and Unaccompanied Minors.

Who would have thought Eight Years Ago that these bathroom laws would be imposed! Even the Liberal state of  California had implemented Proposition 8 defining marriage as between a man and a woman! http://www.alipac.us/f8/pac-plans-defeat-key-politicians-responsible-illegal-immigration-332295/

Of course this is all "Executive Orders." This includes immigration such as DACA and others, and now this Bathroom law!

Unfortunately, the current GOP leadership recoils from the word "IMPEACHMENT" like a vampire from the sunlight, yet they have the Audacity to say Mr. Trump is not conservative!!!!

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/82355/megyn-kelly-says-maligners-of-trannies-must-be-punished-o-j-lawyer-shapiro-is-rock-star/


Tuesday, May 3, 2016

House Panel: 86,000 Criminal Aliens Released Over 3 Years, 19,723 in FY 15

An interesting article from www.numbersusa.com about criminal aliens. This follows this post about this year's black vote. This follows this post about Pope Francis and immigration. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.


House Panel: 86,000 Criminal Aliens Released Over 3 Years, 19,723 in FY 15

 https://www.numbersusa.com/sendfax

At a hearing today, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said “In a three-year period, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has released more than 86,000 criminal aliens into the American public…These are people that were here illegally, got caught committing a crime, were convicted of that crime and instead of deporting them, they were just released back out in the United States of America.” Chairman Chaffetz said the released aliens had been convicted of over 231,000 crimes.
“In 2015, 196 of these people were convicted of homicide, and ICE released them back into the public rather than deporting them…124 of those that were released between fiscal year 2010 and 2015 went on to commit homicide…In 2013, ICE released 36,007 criminal aliens…As of September 2014, 5,700 of those individuals went on to commit additional crimes,” Chaffetz said.


The Center for Immigration Studies released a report yesterday noting that the 19,723 criminal aliens released in FY 2015 had a total of 64,197 convictions. This included 12,661 for alcohol/drug DUI, 8,234 for violent crimes and 208 for homicide.
The report also said “While the total number of (FY 2015) releases is lower than the past two years, since the number of arrests has declined quite dramatically, the rate of releases is approximately the same — meaning that this is no progress at all, and certainly will be no consolation for the victims of these criminal aliens…In 2015, ICE made 119,772 arrests, or just half the number of arrests made in 2013 (232,287).”
Legislation now before Congress to retroactively reduce minimum sentencing requirements would release from federal prisons tens of thousands of criminal aliens. Although the aliens are deportable, many would be released to the streets under Obama Administration policies.
Read more in CNS News.
National Security
amnesty
Interior Enforcement


Thursday, February 4, 2016

Heroin: Only Trump Doesn’t Blame America First.

An interesting article from http://www.vdare.com about Mexico and drugs. This follows this post about the Iowa caucus. This follows this post about Pope Francis and immigration. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.



Heroin is grown in Mexico--a wall would help Americans kick the habit.Heroin is grown in Mexico--a wall would help Americans kick the habit.

Heroin: Only Trump Doesn’t Blame America First


511nk5odwLL._SY344_BO1204203200_-198x300[1]Any politician who claims to care about the drug overdose deaths sweeping the nation, but does not demand that we build a wall, deport illegal aliens and end the anchor baby scam, is a liar.
In 2014, more people died from drug overdoses than any year in U.S. history: 47,055. That’s more than die in car accidents—and it’s not even close.
This is a huge, horrible problem—and it’s a problem caused entirely by the fact that Mexico is on our southern border.
The diverse, hardworking people of Mexico manufacture the majority of heroin in the U.S. and import “nearly all” of it, according to a 2014 Washington Post report.
The media and political class respond to this fact by asking themselves: How do we blame this on Americans—preferably white males?
Even as Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, the head of Mexico’s largest drug cartel, is all over the news boasting, “I supply more heroin, methamphetamine, cocaine and marijuana than anybody else in the world” (The New York Times, Jan. 10, 2016), we’re informed, Hey, don’t blame Mexicans! It’s America’s appetite for drugs that’s driving the narcotics trade!
Mexicans aren’t at fault for dumping these poisons on our country because … it’s the 14-year-old American kid’s fault for getting addicted! Hucksters of cigarettes, subprime mortgages and fake weight loss pills should try that argument. We’re just selling what Americans are buying!
About the time President Bush threw open our southern border—followed by Obama rolling out the welcome mat for illegal aliens—Mexico aggressively moved into the heroin business. In 2007, U.S. authorities seized 367 kilos of heroin on the Mexican border. In 2013, authorities seized 2,162 kilos. During that same time period, heroin use nearly doubled in the U.S.
As a result, in the last decade, half a million Americans have died from drug overdoses, mostly heroin and other opiates. That’s ten times more than the number of Americans who died fighting the entire Vietnam War.
Mexico is pumping drugs into our country, but to blame Mexicans would be “xenophobic.” They’re poor and brown! We can’t blame the Mexican drug cartels, and we certainly can’t blame the corrupt Mexican government that is paid off by the cartels.
Instead, pandering politicians give fiery speeches about drug addiction being a “disease.” However that may be, drug addiction is the only disease that you absolutely can’t catch if you never take drugs. (I also don’t see anyone getting rich by giving people the measles or pneumonia.)
As Donald Trump has said, the best way to avoid becoming addicted to drugs is never to start.
It’s harder to stay away from drugs when Mexico is flooding the country with them. But no politician—except Trump—would dare suggest that we keep the drugs out.
Carly Fiorina talks about how she “buried a child to drug addiction,” on her way to saying “the war on drugs has failed.” Her main objective is to ensure that “families that are suffering through this know that they should not feel ashamed or stigmatized.”
How about not making them suffer through the hell of a drug-addicted child in the first place by keeping drugs out of the country?
Marco Rubio thinks we need government programs to “teach students skills to avoid gangs, violence and drugs.”
Yes, it’s American kids’ fault. While we’re teaching them about drugs, how about a government program to teach people skills to not to give all their money to scammers like Bernie Madoff, instead of criminally prosecuting scam investment firms?
Chris Christie gives passionate speeches about drug addiction being a “disease” that “can happen to anyone,” before demanding that we “start treating people in this country, not jailing them.”
Why is the only choice: a) Blame the addict or b) Don’t blame the addict? How about option c) Blame the drug dealers? Oh I remember! We can’t blame the drug dealers because diversity is a strength!
Not one Republican presidential candidate, other than Trump, has any intention of going after the Mexican drug cartels operating freely in our country. Absolutely none but Trump would consider building a wall on our border. Only Trump has denounced the anchor baby racket. Did I mention that El Chapo’s kids are American anchor babies?
Instead, the other candidates twist and turn to find some way to blame Americans for the fact that the country is drowning in drugs—brought in by innocent Mexicans.
The New York Times’ response to the heroin epidemic is to express smug satisfaction that white Americans suddenly care about drug addicts now that their kids are the addicts.
I’m sorry, but with 50,000 Americans dying every year from drug overdoses, could you put away your “racism” hobbyhorse for five minutes, New York Times? It’s stupid, it’s not helpful, and it’s not true.
The recent surge in heroin overdoses is hitting black and white Americans about equally. According to the CDC, heroin overdose deaths from 2013 to 2014 (the most recent years available) increased by 8 percent for non-Hispanic whites, and increased 8.2 percent for non-Hispanic blacks.
Curiously, heroin deaths of Hispanics increased by 0.0 percent. They aren’t the users; they’re the pushers.
But don’t play the old “blame the perpetrator” game! That would be nativist.
Hillary proposes that the federal government spend more money—a billion dollars a year—to fight drug addiction. Unless that billion is spent on building a wall, her policy prescription is nothing but a government-worker full-employment plan.
Bernie Sanders gets chesty about “the pharmaceutical industry and the drug companies who are producing all of these drugs and not looking at the consequence of it.”
If only we could see a little of that righteous anger directed toward the overwhelming source of illegal drugs in the U.S.: Mexico.
It’s true that overdose by prescription drugs is the leading cause of overdose deaths, but that’s a trick: The CDC classifies all opioid pain reliever deaths as “prescription” opioid overdoses—whether or not an actual doctor or “prescription” was involved. Guess who’s moved into the “prescription” drug business in a big way? That would be Mexico.
But instead of blaming grimy, soulless criminals like El Chapo, who brags about his “fleet of submarines, airplanes, trucks and boats”—bought with drug money—let’s blame American pharmaceutical companies doing God’s work by trying to ease the pain of dying cancer patients.
The CEOs of pharmaceutical companies are mostly Americans—probably white men!—so they’re safe to hate.
Only Donald Trump has made the inarguable point that the most effective way to avoid catching this particular disease is never to start taking drugs. Only Trump would make it a lot harder to start by building a wall and sending Mexican drug dealers and anchor babies home. Only Trump doesn’t blame America first.
Ann Coulter is the legal correspondent for Human Events and writes a popular syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate. She is the author of ELEVEN New York Times bestsellers—collect them here.
Her book, ¡Adios America! The Left’s Plan To Turn Our Country Into A Third World Hell Hole, was released on June 1, 2015.

Thursday, January 28, 2016

A Modern Menace Emerging and Reemerging Diseases

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about diseases like Zika.This follows this post  about abortion and Planned Parenthood. This follows this post about refugees. This follows this post about the papacy. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.


This past April, when the first cases of H1N1 swine flu were detected in Mexico and the United States, health officials around the world went on high alert.
Surveillance measures were put in place. Pharmaceutical companies stepped up production of antiviral drugs. In cities with confirmed cases, schools were closed. Large public gatherings, such as sporting events and concerts, were canceled. Malls, restaurants and other public places were empty. The scenes were very similar to what happened during the SARS and avian flu outbreaks that unfolded in Asia earlier this decade.
Aided by modern transportation, the virus spread rapidly. On June 11, with more than 125,000 confirmed cases and 140 deaths in 73 countries, the World Health Organization (WHO) finally declared the never-before-seen virus a pandemic—a global disease outbreak. The organization had long hesitated to take such a step—declaring the first global flu epidemic in 41 years—lest widespread panic result.
What the final outcome will be remains to be seen. With the arrival of summer in the northern hemisphere—and warm temperatures that flu bugs don't like—the spread slowed considerably. While there have been a large number of infections, this strain has been milder than originally feared and has been responsible for a relatively small number of fatalities.
Still, “that may only be the lull before the storm,” warned Richard Besser, M.D., acting director of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia. His concern is over what will happen this fall when the traditional flu season begins. “What has been seen with previous outbreaks is flu goes away in the summer,” he noted. “But during the winter flu spreads better, so the virus could go away and come back.”
“I believe we are not out of the woods yet,” added Christopher Ohl, M.D., associate professor of medicine in the section on infectious diseases at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. “I am concerned this virus is going to be with us for a while. It could change, become more virulent, have an increased secondary transmission rate…in the future.”
Of course, the spread of swine flu isn't the only disease problem health officials are concerned about right now. Let's consider the scope of the threat before us, look at some of the underlying causes, and see what light the Bible sheds on how the situation has developed and where things could go from here.

Deadly pathogens emerging or reemerging

Currently the WHO is monitoring about 40 emerging infectious diseases. These have been around only a few decades.
The list includes acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), Ebola, dengue hemorrhagic fever, Lassa fever, Nipah, Hendra, hantavirus, Marburg, monkeypox, mad cow disease (BSE), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), West Nile virus, Lyme disease, Legionnaires' disease and the cyclospora parasite. These pathogens—disease-causing agents—have either mutated or genetically recombined to become new strains or novel microbes, or they may have existed for millennia but weren't discovered until recent years.
According to the WHO, at least one new infectious disease has emerged each year since 1980, many of which evade traditional therapies and have no vaccine or cure. “There are far more virulent, very difficult-to-treat infectious diseases today than there were 20 or 30 years ago,” warns Klaus Stohr, D.V.M., Ph.D., director of the influenza task force for the WHO in Geneva, Switzerland.
At the same time, old infectious diseases once believed to be controlled, such as tuberculosis, staphylococcus, cholera, malaria, hepatitis, influenza and diphtheria, are reemerging as deadly new, often drug-resistant strains, or are springing up in new regions of the world.
With so many deadly pathogens coming on the scene, notes Dr. Stohr, “infectious diseases are once again the leading cause of death in the world—something that hasn't been the case since the pre-antibiotic era of the early 1900s.” Of the estimated 57 million deaths that occur annually in the world, the WHO estimates that 15 million of them are directly caused by infectious diseases. Millions more deaths are due to secondary effects of infections.
Scientists have identified close to 200 bacterial, viral, parasitic and fungal pathogens that are linked with emerging and reemerging infections among human beings. There could be another 1,000 out there, according to Dr. Stohr. They just haven't been introduced yet into the population.
At least 75 percent of these pathogens are zoonoses—meaning they are transmitted between animals and people—which makes these diseases even more problematic. Transmission can occur through direct contact with an infected animal's blood, saliva, urine or feces, or via an intermediate vector—typically an insect or rodent—that gets the pathogen from an infected animal reservoir and then passes it to people.
“Zoonotic diseases cannot usually be eradicated due to the fact that it is not possible to eliminate all of the animal reservoirs or vectors that might be carrying the zoonosis,” explains David Freedman, M.D., professor of medicine in the division of geographic medicine at the University of Alabama.
“Even if you developed a vaccine and a cure for a particular zoonotic disease and it was somehow possible to simultaneously treat every person in the world that had it,” he observes, “there are still animals that can transmit that disease back to humans and continue the spread of that pathogen.”

Deadly epidemics prophesied

If you are familiar with end-time Bible prophecy, none of this may be a surprise to you. Perhaps what immediately comes to mind is the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, and in particular the fourth.
The apostle John describes the horse and rider this way: “When He opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature saying, 'Come and see.' So I looked, and behold, a pale horse. And the name of him who sat on it was Death, and Hades [the grave] followed with him” (Revelation 6:7-8, emphasis added throughout).
The latter part of this verse refers to death resulting from “the beasts of the earth.” Considering the huge number of deaths described here, this could well refer to epidemics caused by animals that transmit and carry infectious diseases.
In Jesus' parallel prophecy in Matthew 24, He reveals the true identity of this pale green horse: “And there will be… pestilences” (verse 7). The fourth horseman symbolizes climactic, globe-encircling plagues and pandemics. We need only consider the devastating “black death”—bubonic plague that killed tens of millions worldwide in three great waves—to understand how horrifyingly real this prophecy can be.

Many factors behind pandemics

That's the simple explanation for why these outbreaks will intensify. Yet there are a lot of factors behind these pandemics. Many believe mankind is actually creating its own disease problems, albeit unintentionally.
“In almost every case humans are the most important single factor in the surge of new diseases, whether it's feeding cow tissue to cattle to cause mad cow disease, people eating exotic animals in the case of Ebola, or air travel spreading dengue around the world,” claims Thomas Monath, M.D., chief scientific officer with Acambis Inc., a vaccine development company based in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
We are not simply victims of emerging infections, he says, but we're making changes in our environment or lifestyles to cause the emergence or spread of disease. Most of the change that has occurred involves several key areas.

• Agricultural practices and consumption of exotic animals

One of the primary ways new diseases emerge is through what biologists call “genetic recombination.” This can happen when two or more animal species come in contact with each other and exchange the viruses that each carries.
“Two different viruses may infect the same cell. Then the genomes get jumbled, and a totally novel virus emerges—which contains genetic material from both parental strains,” explains Roy Anderson, fellow of the Royal Society (FRS) and professor of infectious disease epidemiology at Imperial College of the University of London.
One way this is happening more and more is through a farming method which is becoming an increasingly common practice in Asia.
“Ducks or chickens are kept in cages hung above pigs, which are housed in pens directly above fishponds, where other types of fowl may also swim and eliminate their own wastes,” notes Bruno Chomel, Ph.D., D.V.M., a veterinary epidemiologist specializing in zoonotic diseases at the University of California College of Veterinary Medicine.
Farmers use this method to save money on pig feed and increase yields of fish. The pigs feed on the duck droppings, and the pig manure fertilizes the fishponds. “The problem is, it puts ducks and other waterfowl, which are major reservoirs of influenza viruses—although it doesn't affect them— in direct contact with pigs, which may also be harboring influenza viruses,” Dr. Chomel says.
A pig that eats duck droppings can take in any viruses the ducks may have, which may include both avian and human flu viruses. Those can combine with the pig's influenza viruses, and then they'll all be mixed up inside the pig's stomach.
That is how the H1N1 influenza virus—which is a mixture of avian, human and pig flu viruses—came to be. One of the reasons scientists are so concerned about the current swine flu outbreak is that it could recombine with a more virulent strain before returning to the northern hemisphere in the fall flu season.
“If a human flu virus, which is easily transmissible to humans, combines with a virulent and novel duck or swine flu, that is when you have problems,” Dr. Chomel says. “You get the worst of both, together in one virus.”
Recombination can also occur when humans eat nondomesticated exotic animals. In China, exotic animals like civet cats, coral snakes, tree shrews, flying squirrels, badgers, martens and pangolins are considered delicacies. In Africa, monkeys, apes, aardvarks and rats are all popular meat choices. Guinea pigs, capybaras and armadillos are commonly eaten in Central and South America.
When people consume these meats, any viruses the animal may have been carrying can combine with viruses the person may have. The result may be a new pathogen that infects human beings.
That is apparently how HIV, the deadly virus that causes AIDS, emerged. HIV is a fusion of the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), which infects monkeys and apes, and a similar type of virus that infects people. “SIV was transferred to humans as a result of monkeys being killed and eaten or their blood getting into cuts or wounds on the hunter,” Dr. Freedman says.
The bottom line, says Dr. Chomel, is “the practice of consuming wild species opens the door for a much wider variety of pathogens—those of wild animals—to come in contact with humans and develop transmissibility.”

• Changing land use increases contact

Ecological changes often cause disease emergence. “There are environments in the developing world that used to be quite remote that are now much less so as a result of human activities like deforestation, dam projects, irrigation, road construction and extensive agriculture,” says Jim Hughes, M.D., director of global infectious disease programs at Emory University and former director of the National Center for Infectious Diseases at the CDC.
These remote wilderness areas are home to some unique microbes—bacteria, parasites or viruses not found anywhere else. When people enter these ecosystems, they encounter these pathogens for the first time. For example, mankind's first contact with the Ebola virus occurred in the late 1970s when people began clearing the rainforests of the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The animal inhabitants themselves can also contribute to the spread of deadly microbes. “Once forests are cleared, the wildlife that used to live there have no choice but to migrate further out in search of food and land in which to live,” says Stephen Corber, M.D., director of prevention and control for the Pan American Health Organization in Washington, D.C.
“A lot of times they end up in suburbs and farming communities where they make contact with people,” he says. “If they're bringing diseases with them, that's when you have problems.”

• Rapid international travel allows quick spread

Since the third quarter of the 20th century, individuals have been able to travel huge distances in a matter of hours—well within the incubation period of many infectious diseases. “Today anyone can get on a plane and get to the other side of the world in a matter of 24 to 36 hours,” notes Dr. Hughes.
The speed of travel enables someone in North America, Europe or Asia to go on safari in Kenya, pick up the Ebola virus or some other pathogen, fly back home, pass unnoticed through immigration and customs checks, and then spend the next few days back at work before suddenly getting sick. During the incubation period—the time between getting infected and developing clinical signs of disease—this person may expose hundreds of people to the virus.
“People can be spreading disease and not even know they are ill,” warns Hugh Pennington, M.D., Ph.D., president of the Society for General Microbiology in the United Kingdom and honorary professor of medicine at the Institute of Medical Sciences at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland.
This is in sharp contrast to past days when people traveled by ship. It may have taken several weeks to travel from one continent to another. “If someone had picked up a virus before getting on the ship, he would have developed that disease while still on board,” Dr. Pennington says. “Upon arrival, it would have been obvious to port authorities which passengers were sick and needed to be quarantined.”
As illustrated by the recent rapid spread of the H1N1 swine flu virus, modern travel can allow deadly pathogens to quickly outrace our best preventative measures.

• Poverty and disease inextricably linked

Not surprisingly, the poorest nations usually have the worst problems with infectious diseases. Sadly, poverty levels appear to be on the increase for much of the world. According to a 2008 United Nations report, more than 80 countries have lower per capita income today than at the beginning of the 1990s.
“As poverty levels climb, so does the incidence of disease,” says Dr. Anderson. The poor are often malnourished, lack understanding of proper hygiene, have no access to medical care and live in densely populated slums—perfect conditions for the transmission of diseases.
One of the most desperate regions of the world is sub-Saharan Africa. A 2004 World Bank report found that close to half the population in this region lives in poverty, and this percentage is projected to increase in the years ahead.
But, warns Dr. Anderson, “This is not just a concern for Africa.” Just as diseases do not stay in the poorer parts of a town, they do not confine themselves to poorer nations. “Many of the diseases that Western nations are contending with today got their start in the developing world,” he adds.
Sooner or later, there's a visitor to a disease- infested area, or someone from that area travels to another region and then transports the pathogen to a new part of the world.

• Urbanization aids disease transmission

Increasing numbers of people, particularly in the developing world, are moving from rural areas to large cities to find work. In this way, contagions that may once have been obscure and localized in sparsely inhabited villages reach large population centers. Once in a city, the newly introduced infection multiplies among the local population and then spreads farther along highways and railroads and by airplane.
Many end up living in overcrowded “megacities”—huge urban conglomerations of 5 million or more residents. There are at least 41 megacities in the world today, most of which are in less-developed nations. In contrast, 50 years ago there were just eight megacities in the world, all but two of these in developed countries. Experts predict that by 2015, 59 megacities will exist, 48 in developing nations.
“Pathogens like dense populations because it promotes transmission from person to person,” Dr. Anderson explains. Because the populations of megacities have grown so rapidly, most are not prepared to deal with such large numbers of residents, nor are their local economies usually strong enough to finance a lot of city improvements.
“Sewage and water systems are often inadequate, resulting in water supplies that are tainted with deadly bacteria,” Dr. Anderson says. “There may not be enough hospitals, so when people do get sick, they cannot get the medical care they need.” Additionally, he adds, most megacities are located in tropical or subtropical regions where infectious microbes thrive.

• Forced displacement due to war or civil strife

The United Nations estimates there to be a record high of 35.6 million refugees and internally displaced persons in the world today. These are people who've been forced to flee their homes due to internal conflict, war or persecution. The majority are from war-torn regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Southern Asia and Latin America. In recent years the number of displaced people has steadily risen due to the increasing number of conflicts in the world.
This trend has a direct impact on the proliferation of infectious diseases. “Refugees are often in poor health and very susceptible to infectious agents. Any pathogens they may be infected with are transported with them on their route and to wherever they end up,” Dr. Monath explains.
Not only that, he continues, “the temporary settlements or camps they may be living in are typically overcrowded, have poor sanitation, are infested with rodents and other vectors, and the food and water supplies may be contaminated—just what bacteria need to flourish.”
A case in point would be the 800,000 Rwandan refugees who migrated into Zaire in 1994. Cholera and shigella dysentery swept through the camps, killing nearly 50,000 people in the first month.

• Human morality and disease

The 1960s brought dramatic changes in human morality, particularly in terms of sexual behavior. “Whereas having multiple or concurrent sexual partners was unacceptable in the early 1900s, by the latter half of the 20th century it had become the norm in many societies,” notes Dr. Pennington.
Not only had “casual sex” among heterosexuals become acceptable, men having sex with other men became more commonplace. At the same time, intravenous drug use became rampant, with drug users often sharing needles with other injectors.
It all fueled the spread of HIV, hepatitis C, genital herpes and other sexually transmitted diseases—all of which are transmitted through the transference of body fluids.
• Overuse of antibiotics creates deadly new superbugs
Widespread antibiotic use—often when antibiotics weren't called for—has created new antibiotic-resistant bacteria. “Patients will often insist they need an antibiotic when they have a cold or the flu, and sometimes doctors will give in to these demands,” observes Trish Perl, M.D., director of hospital epidemiology and infection control at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. The problem is that colds and flu are caused by viruses, which are not treatable with antibiotics.
According to the CDC, up to 40 percent of antibiotics prescribed in doctor's offices are for viral infections. This is not always due, however, to patients demanding they get an antibiotic. Sometimes physicians prescribe antibiotics when they can't make a definite diagnosis or “just in case” bacteria are present.
“With so many antibiotics in the environment, we're pressuring these bacteria to evolve into resistant strains,” Dr. Perl asserts. “A particular drug may be prescribed so much that sooner or later the bacterium outsmarts it and learns how to grow within that environment.” At that point, the particular drug is no longer effective at treating that type of bacteria.
Dr. Pennington explains the process this way: “Any population of organisms, bacteria included, naturally includes variants with unusual traits—in this case, the ability to withstand an antibiotic's attack on a microbe. When people take antibiotics, the drug kills the defenseless bacteria, leaving behind—or 'selecting'—those that can resist it. These renegade bacteria then multiply and become the predominant microorganism.”
Adding to the problem, North American livestock producers have been unnecessarily feeding antibiotics to their animals to try to promote growth and as a preventative disease-control measure. This has turned the livestock into a reservoir of drug-resistant germs. When people eat undercooked, contaminated meat, they can become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Today there are drug-resistant strains of tuberculosis, malaria, streptococci and salmonella—to name a few “superbugs” that have emerged in recent years. Because they have the antibiotic-resistant gene in them, they are considered to be genetically new organisms. “Some infections are now so resistant to the drugs we have available that they are virtually untreatable,” Dr. Hughes says.
The infamous “flesh-eating bacteria,” methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), is one of these terrifying new superbugs regularly making headlines.

Biblical perspectives

To students of the Bible, many of the factors just discussed are obvious violations of biblical instruction. A lot of the zoonotic diseases plaguing our modern societies would never have become a problem if people weren't consuming exotic or biblically “unclean” animals, which harbor a lot of contagious diseases that domesticated “clean” animals do not. We're told in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 which types of animals should and should not be eaten.
Many of those living in overcrowded megacities and refugee camps are faced with inadequate waste disposal systems, resulting in contaminated food and water supplies. This is another area addressed in the Bible. Deuteronomy 23:9-14 says that human wastes were to be buried outside the community, away from where people were living.
The Bible is clear about what constitutes sexually immoral behavior, which is the root cause of the spread of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases plaguing our planet. In Leviticus 18 and 20, God prohibits incestuous relationships, extramarital and premarital sex, homosexuality and unnatural acts with animals. Homosexuality is specifically addressed again in Romans 1:27 and 1 Corinthians 6:9. The Bible tells us in 1 Corinthians 6:18 that “he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body.”
Ultimately though, disease outbreaks and pandemics are a result of mankind's broken relationship with God.
When God brought the Israelites out of Egypt, He told them: “If you diligently heed the voice of the Lord your God and do what is right in His sight, give ear to His commandments and keep all His statutes, I will put none of the diseases on you which I have brought on the Egyptians. For I am the Lord who heals you” (Exodus 15:26).
On the other hand, God warned of consequences for disobedience, including disease outbreaks (Leviticus 26:21, 25; Deuteronomy 28:15, 21-22, 27-28). Nevertheless, the Israelites persistently disobeyed Him. So has every society since, and mankind continues to reap the consequences.
The only real solution to the threat of devastating contagions is to turn to God in repentance—seeking and remaining committed to His ways. You as an individual can turn to God, and He will see you through the dark times ahead. This includes worsening pandemics, as the world at large is not yet ready to submit to God's will.
Today, humanity as a whole is cut off from God. His promise of protection from disease isn't there, but someday it will be. Jesus Christ will return to earth and establish God's everlasting Kingdom (Revelation 19:11-16). We can look forward to that day when mankind will be united with its Creator and will receive all the blessings of living God's way of life—which includes good health and a world free of disease outbreaks. GN

You might also be interested in...

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Patriots Should Rejoice As Cruz Tries to Steal Trump’s Thunder on Immigration

An interesting article from www.Vdare.com about Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. This follows this post about helping Syrian refugees. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.



Trump and Cruz are friends, but only one of them can be President.Trump and Cruz are friends, but only one of them can be President.

Patriots Should Rejoice As Cruz Tries to Steal Trump’s Thunder on Immigration


Even Donald Trump can’t single-handedly turn Republicans into a party for immigration patriots. But the GOP frontrunner is receiving some support from an unexpected quarter—Senator Ted Cruz. Albeit overshadowed by the Paris bombing, Cruz has suddenly started to sound like Trump when it comes to birthright citizenship, limiting H1-B visas, attacking the Donor Class, and building Trump’s signature wall. Not surprisingly, Trump has even speculated about the Texas Senator as a vice-presidential candidate. [Trump names Cruz when asked about VP spot, By Mark Hensch, Politico, November 17, 2015]Regardless, a process of radicalizing the party is underway that the GOP Establishment can’t control.
Greatly to his credit, Ted Cruz opposed the Gang of Eight’s Amnesty/ Immigration Surge bill. But, looked at in more detail, Cruz has a checkered record on immigration, often falling into the cliché of “legal immigration good, illegal immigration bad. His overall position at the beginning of the primary season was distinctly weaker than that of some other candidates. Cruz barely mentioned immigration when he announced his campaign and he has a long record of wanting to boost H1B visas as a handout to the Donor Class.
Unexpectedly, however, Cruz made his move during the most recent Republican debate. As the moderators tried to bait other candidates into attacking frontrunner Trump, Cruz unexpectedly threw down the gauntlet on immigration, blasting any effort to turn Republicans into the “party of Amnesty” and, critically, connecting the immigration issue to low wages.
In the days that followed, Cruz outright switched sides on H1B visas, saying he would halt the program pending the outcome of an investigation into abuse. He also said he would not support any increases in legal immigration because of unacceptably high unemployment [Ted Cruz turns on legal immigration, by Benjy Sarlin, NBC News, November 13, 2015].
While Cruz has largely refrained from attacking Donald Trump, a pro-Cruz super PAC has unleashed an advertising campaign in Iowa savaging Donor Class favorite Marco Rubio for his support of the Gang of Eight bill, which the ad characterizes (correctly) as an “Amnesty scheme” shaped in collusion with Barack Obama [New Radio Ad Hammers Marco Rubio Over Immigration, on Ted Cruz’s Behalf, by Maggie Haberman, New York Times, November 17, 2015]
Cruz has also slammed what he called an “unholy alliance” between lobbyists and financiers and slammed “Establishment Republicans” working for cheap labor [Ted Cruz whips up immigration hardliners at Orlando rally, by Alex Leary, Tampa Bay Times, November 13, 2015]
Even more significant, Cruz has explicitly committed to ending birthright citizenship, bringing up the topic during his stump speeches, and, critically, featuring it in his official platform [Cruz Plan To Stop Illegal Immigration Highlights, Ted Cruz 2016, Accessed November 23, 2015].
For good measure, Cruz also says in his platform “I will complete the wall”—and vows to triple the number of Border Patrol agents.
And especially promising: like Trump before him, Cruz is now reportedly working with America’s Senator, Jeff Sessions, on the immigration issue [Ted Cruz hits GOP field on immigration after debate, MSNBC, November 11, 2015]
Unfortunately, Ted Cruz also still shows some signs of that cynical calculation that so many people decry in him. Recently, he bemoaned certain unnamed Republicans “whose rhetoric is unhelpful with regard to immigration” and lectured “tone matters” [Ted Cruz: “Are there some in the Republican Party whose rhetoric is unhelpful with regards to immigration? Yes,” by Allahpundit, Hot Air, November 23, 2015]. The fact that Cruz was saying this while campaigning in Iowa with Steve King, who has faced the same kinds of accusations as Trump about “tone,” did not go unnoticed.
Cruz is also triangulating against Donald Trump over Syrian refugees, criticizing Trump’s proposed registries (which anyway have been mischaracterized by the Main Stream Media) in a disappointing genuflection to Political Correctness. [Cruz rejects Trump’s support for Muslim registries, by Katie Glueck, Politico, November 20, 2015]
Cruz is now claiming to be opposed to the admission of Muslim refugees while expressing willingness to welcome Christians, a reversal of his previous position [Ted Cruz Last Year: We Should Welcome Syrian Refugees, And We Can Do It Safely, by Nico Pitney, Huffington Post, November 18, 2015]. But considering how Cruz has lectured persecuted Middle Eastern Christians that the real issue was that they were too “anti-Semitic” and hateful, it’s hard not to interpret this as a nakedly political move.
And, ominously, Cruz also has still not closed the door to eventual legalization for illegal immigrants, referring vaguely to an eventual “national conversation” about their status.
To give him due credit, Cruz refers to the need for a mandatory E-verify system and some deportations, which he sensibly says will hopefully lead to “the number of people here illegally drop[ping] significantly [i.e. attrition through enforcement] [Ted Cruz won’t rule out legalization for 11 million in U.S. illegally, Time, November 20, 2015].
Still, Rubio is countering Cruz’s charges of being soft on the immigration issue by saying Cruz and Rubio share “almost all the same views on immigration,” especially on legalization for illegals once the border is secure (whatever that means) [Cruz takes the gloves off, attacking Rubio on immigration, by Katie Zezima and David Weigel, Washington Post, November 12, 2015]. Unless Cruz rules out legalization, at present there’s not much he can say in response besides ending birthright citizenship. This means that he still comes off as having a weaker position than Trump.
Trump himself still seems divided about how to respond. On one hand, he has said they will go to “war” if Cruz keeps gaining [Trump: I’ll ‘go to war’ with Cruz if he rises higher, by Mark Hensch, The Hill, November 16, 2015]. But shortly afterward, Trump actually mentioned Cruz when he speculated about a possible VP pick [Trump names Cruz when asked about VP spot, by Mark Hensch, The Hill, November 17, 2015]
The truth is that Cruz is simply following where Trump leads because The Donald has successfully shifted the Overton Window. One thing the parasitic class of GOP consultants and “strategists” never understand: politics is not just about positioning a candidate in the static sweet spot where he can mediate public opinion. A constituency can be mobilized or radicalized. A skilled leader can shift the terms of the debate. Trump has done just that.
The white base of the Republican Party is actually more militant, dedicated and radical than its putative leaders in the GOP. While the likes of George W. Bush, Mitt Romney, and Paul Ryan served to actually dampen the enthusiasm of their voters, Trump is whipping up their enthusiasm to a fever pitch.
As even the generally-useless George Will has noted, Ted Cruz is implicitly using some variant of the Sailer Strategy to win. Thus he can’t afford to antagonize Trump’s supporters. In effect, he is providing cover for Trump. He is even helping take out Trump’s most dangerous foes, especially Marco Rubio. Cruz’ appeal to evangelicals is also weakening Ben Carson, who is bleeding supporters as Cruz rises [Fox News poll: Trump gains, Carson slips, Cruz and Rubio climb in GOP race, by Dana Blanton, Fox News, November 22, 2015]
At some point, Cruz has to supersede Trump in order to win the nomination. But as even Leftist outlets have observed, because Cruz risks alienating his own supporters, he has to count on Trump imploding. And Trump hasn’t imploded yet. What evidence is there that this will ever happen? [Ted Cruz has a Donald Trump problem: He’s waiting for a Trump collapse that may never happen, by Simon Maloy, Salon, November 23, 2015]
Ted Cruz also has a larger strategic problem. He is running as a “right of the right” candidate who is essentially trying to out-conservative” everyone else. No matter how he triangulates, no one will take Ted Cruz seriously as a moderate. In contrast, Trump is actually growing the party by winning blue collar voters, what used to be called Reagan Democrats. Cruz can trump the Trump when it comes to “movement” credentials, but the white base cares more about trade, immigration, and a larger idea of national greatness. And here, no one can match Trump’s appeal.
As a result, unless Trump manages to inflict a catastrophic injury on himself (sadly, always a possibility), Cruz is limited strategically to serving as Trump’s wingman. By the time Cruz can dispose of Rubio and turn on Trump, it will be too late.
From an immigration patriot’s point of view, Cruz is simply helping to consolidate Trump’s positions on border security, H1-B visas, and birthright citizenship as part of the GOP mainstream.
Only Trump can stump Trump. Barring that, Cruz isn’t a rival.
But nevertheless, whatever his motives, Cruz’s conversion is very good news for immigration patriots—an objective ally in the historic process of turning the GOP from a tool of the donors into the National Conservative party America so desperately needs.
James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.