Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Demographic shifts changing the face of America

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about demographics and the electoral college. This follows this post about Gaza. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

MP3 Audio (6.1 MB)
“At its core, demography is the act of counting people,” begins a new report from the Pew Research Center about U.S. population changes. “But it’s also important to study the forces that are driving population change, and measure how these changes have an impact on people’s lives.”
The report went on to summarize 10 demographic changes that are reshaping the United States in significant ways. Among them are:
Immigration is making the country more racially and ethnically diverse . Almost 60 million immigrants have come into the country over the last 50 years, largely from Mexico and Asia (“Asia” in this case being primarily the Middle East, Pakistan and India rather than China and Japan). The percentage of America’s foreign-born population has nearly tripled over the same time to 14 percent, meaning one out of every seven were born outside the United States.
The numbers of Asian and African immigrants are rising, while the number of net immigrants from Mexico has leveled off and is slowly decreasing.
Millennials, those born after 1980, likely now outnumber the “Baby Boomer” generation (born 1946-1964)—and differ from them significantly. They are racially diverse (43 percent are non-white), politically more liberal, and more highly educated—with the result that many struggle with student debt and still live at home.
Mothers are now the sole or primary wage earner in 40 percent of all households with children. This means that large numbers of children spend little time with either parent. More than a quarter of all children under 18 live with a single parent; 5 percent live with no parent at all.
American families are changing in other ways. The percentage of Americans over 25 who have never been married is the highest ever at 20 percent. This is more than double the 9 percent of never-married adults in 1960. About one in four young adults aged 25 to 34—the prime childbearing years—are not married but living with a partner.
The middle class is shrinking. In 2015, after four decades in which middle-class families were the majority, only half of U.S. adults lived in middle-income households. As the middle class has shrunk, the gap between the “haves” and “have-nots” has grown.
The percentage of Americans identifying as Christian is shrinking while the number of those religiously unaffiliated is growing. From 2007 to 2014, the percentage claiming Christianity dropped from 78 to 71 percent while the religiously unaffiliated climbed from 16 to 23 percent.
These trends have sobering implications for the nation.  The changes due to immigration show that America’s leaders are repeating the mistake that is currently bringing so much chaos to Europe—opening doors to millions of immigrants from other cultures and religions who will never fully assimilate into American culture.
The changes in family life show that the nation is drifting farther from the God-designed family model (of a husband and wife bound in a loving marriage and bringing up children who are taught godly principles and values). Veering from God’s design brings only greater personal and societal costs.
And rejection of biblical Christianity to embrace other religions (or none at all) leads to only further moral, cultural and societal breakdown as people look to human government or themselves to find solutions for their problems. As Proverbs 14:12 said some 3,000 years ago, “There is a way that seems right to man, but its end is the way of death.”
To learn more about where these trends are leading and why, download or request our free study guide The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy . (Source: Pew Research Center.)

You might also be interested in...

Shut down Clinton Foundation over Hizballah link

A timely post about from www.jihadwatch.org about the Clinton Foundation. This follows this post about a downplayed story about Virginia. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.You can follow me here.

Trump campaign: Shut down Clinton Foundation over Hizballah link

Trump’s Senior Communications Advisor, Jason Miller, states: “The fact a major Clinton Foundation donor was denied entry into the U.S. over ties to the terrorist group Hezbollah is deeply troubling, especially when this individual had access to top aides at Hillary Clinton’s State Department.”
Miller went on to say that the Clinton Foundation should be shut down in light of the Hizballah jihadist link.
It’s becoming increasingly challenging to keep up with the staggering volume of public scandals surrounding Hillary Clinton — including calls for her to be jailed (even from the mother of a Benghazi victim). It is remarkable to witness such a character actually running for the presidency during a full-scale jihad against the United States that Clinton not only refuses to admit exists, but also accepts funding for her campaign from a highly questionable donor who appears to be on the other side of that jihad.
secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton
“Clinton Foundation donor denied entry to US on terrorism claims”, By Marisa Schultz, August 28, 2016:
A Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire who donated millions to Clinton-family nonprofits was denied a visa to enter the United States last year on terrorism-related grounds, according to a new report.
Gilbert Chagoury, who donated millions to the Clinton Foundation and in 2009 pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative, was denied entry last summer amid a review of his ties in Lebanon to Hezbollah, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday.
The Trump campaign quickly renewed its call for a shutdown of the Clinton Foundation.
“The fact a major Clinton Foundation donor was denied entry into the US over ties to the terrorist group Hezbollah is deeply troubling, especially when this individual had access to top aides at Hillary Clinton’s State Department,” Trump spokesman Jason Miller said Sunday, calling for the release of Clinton’s schedules and the shutdown of the charity.
The Trump team also released a new Web ad Sunday accusing the Clinton Foundation of being a “slush fund” that “sold access to the State Department.”
“Hillary Clinton’s corruption has been exposed again,” the ad says.
Chagoury, who owns Africa’s largest construction company, had unique access to the State Department, Hillary Clinton’s e-mails revealed.
The billionaire was on the Department of Homeland Security’s no-fly list in 2010 and was pulled off a plane. He’s now on the “selectee” list that allows him to fly with extra scrutiny. Chagoury has denied any support for the terrorist group.
Clinton maintains she never took action as secretary of state because of any donations to the foundation. The Clintons have announced they will stop accepting foundation donations from foreign interests if Clinton wins the White House.
Meanwhile, new e-mails show a top Clinton Foundation official, Doug Band, handpicked mega donors to attend a State Department lunch with then-Chinese President Hu Jintao in January 2011, ABC News reported.
Band e-mailed Clinton aide Huma Abedin in December 2010 suggesting names of Clinton Foundation donors to attend the high-profile event: Bob McCann, the then-president of wealth management at UBS; Dr. Judith Rodin, the president of The Rockefeller Foundation; and Hikmet Ersek, the CEO of Western Union.
He asked if one guest could be seated by Vice President Joe Biden. “I’ll ask,” Abedin replied
It wasn’t clear if the special favor for Clinton donors resulted in their attendance at the luncheon.’…
Kerry: Media should cover terrorism less so that "people wouldn't know what's going on"
German army has admitted over 60 suspected Islamic State jihadis into its ranks
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousStumbleUponDiasporaEmailPrint

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

World News and Trends: Can Gaza stay quiet?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Gaza. This follows this post about the Lost 10 Tribes.  This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

Arab militants in the Gaza Strip, located on Israel's southwestern border, have again been striking at the Jewish state, spurring Israeli retaliation.
This poses a threat to the position of Gaza's Hamas rulers, so they indicated on April 2 that “they were trying to keep attacks on Israel in check, in an apparent attempt to keep a recent spate of violence from spiraling into open conflict” (Rizek Abdel Jawad, “Hamas Tries to Keep Attacks on Israel in Check,” Associated Press, April 2, 2010).
Both Israel and the Hamas governments would benefit by maintaining the peace. Israel's southern communities would benefit since they live so close to the border where terrorists have lobbed their rockets. The Hamas government would benefit since 80 percent of the population relies on United Nations food handouts to survive.
Israel holds Hamas accountable for maintaining peace in the Gaza Strip. Yet will they really be able to keep cool many hot-headed extremists who ache for an all-out war with Israel—especially when they are extremists themselves? (Source: Associated Press.)

You might also be interested in...

Controversy Over "Stupid Suckers" Ad Against McCain

An interesting article from www.alipac.us about John McCain's senate primary. This follows this post about the presidential candidate's stance on immigration issues. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.

PAC Responds To Controversy Over "Stupid Suckers" Ad Against McCain


(Raleigh, NC) Americans for Legal Immigration PAC is issuing the following statement in response to the controversy regarding the group's new ad against John McCain that is currently being broadcast to Arizona voters via automated calls, online ads, and internet and phone based volunteers.

The new ad was released yesterday on Saturday, August 27, 2016, in the hope of reminding Arizona voters that John McCain lied to them during his 2010 campaign when he promised not to run for office again and not to support amnesty for illegal immigrants anymore. ALIPAC is asking for volunteers and donors to help reach as many voters as possible with the new ad titled John McCain's Arizona Suckers for Lies & Amnesty.

McCain's lies are well documented by the fact he is on the ballot facing a strong GOP challenger named Dr. Kelli Ward this Tuesday, August 30, and he voted for the Gang of Eight Amnesty bill (S. 744) in 2013!

ALIPAC's Controversial Ad
John McCain's Arizona Suckers for Lies & Amnesty

https://youtu.be/NHa37TrHxCs


"While some Arizona voters feel my use of the term "stupid suckers" is too harsh, the real problem is John McCain and all of the Americans who have lost their jobs, communities, homes, and very lives to the illegal aliens he supports with Amnesty legislation!" said William Gheen, President of ALIPAC, in response to the criticisms. "People can say that me and my message are the problem, but I'm not the one that lied to them, John McCain is. They can shoot the messenger if they want, but the truth is that every voter that voted to reelect McCain in the GOP primary of 2010 due to his promises to not run again and stop supporting amnesty got suckered! Whether they are stupid enough to reelect him again in 48 hours remains to be determined."

Some voters receiving the automated call from William Gheen of ALIPAC are choosing to interpret the message as Gheen calling Arizona voters "Stupid Suckers" while the ad attempts to be clear that John McCain is treating them like "Stupid Suckers" and are airing their complaints via phone calls, messages, and online posts.

William Gheen and ALIPAC volunteers plan to double down and stick to this controversial message until polls close on Tuesday August 30!

For more information about how John McCain is treating Arizona voters like "Stupid Suckers," the emerging controversy over ALIPAC's new anti-McCain ad, or to schedule interviews, please visit www.ALIPAC.us.
 

Monday, August 29, 2016

Editorial: The Clinton Foundation - Crimes and Corruption

Editorial

In the Must Read book "Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweizer, the Clinton Foundation and other crimes by the Clinton family are alleged to have happened and this should be a PLAYBOOK, for the House and Senate when they come back from their summer recess, as well as by Donald Trump in his campaigning.

The Clinton Foundation is only one of many items that need to be investigated. Others include the TRUTH about Benghazi, the Iran deal, arming the Chinese, selling uranium to Russia, as well as a whole host of other charges.



Allegations of Housing Discrimination against Donald Trump

A timely post from http://www.vdare.com about the allegations about Donald Trump doing housing discrimination. This follows this post about the false charge of racism towards immigration enforcement. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can follow me here.



flashback-coney-island-nathans-1968

Who Were the Racist Tenants Who Insisted Fred Trump Not Rent to Blacks in Coney Island and Brighton Beach?


As part of the big push behind Hillary’s Alt-Right speech, the NYT is rolling out breaking news articles about how nearly a half century ago Trump’s dad, with the young Donald’s assistance, tried to prevent white flight from his apartment complexes in places like Coney Island, Brighton Beach, and Forest Hills. As Hillary said on Thursday:
When he was getting his start in business, he was sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent apartments to black and Latino tenants. Their applications would be marked with a ‘C’ – ‘C’ for ‘colored’ – and then rejected. Three years later, the Justice Department took Trump back to court because he hadn’t changed.
This subject has been gone over repeatedly over the years, but one little explored question about this old story however is: Who exactly were these white racist tenants who were renting in Trump properties in Coney, Island, Brighton Beach, and Forest Hills but who would have white-flighted out to Long Island if too many blacks had flooded in to the Trump buildings? The young Jared Taylor? The unborn Richard Spencer? Haven Monahan’s grandpa?
To help the NYT in its investigations into the festering heart of the roots of racism in Coney Island, Brighton Beach, and Forest Hills, I’ve found this home movie of David Duke’s upbringing under the Coney Island roller coaster:
Seriously, I explained the answer in passing in Taki’s Magazine a year ago in answer to a Washington Post article taking the opposite tack from the latest round of attacks. Last year’s article denounced Donald for not being like his dad Fred who built for the white middle class. I responded:
The evolution of the Trump brand name in housing over the past two generations strikingly illuminates how race has played a role in American life becoming so much more biased in favor of billionaires.
ADVERTISEMENT
A recent Washington Post article is headlined “How Donald Trump abandoned his father’s middle-class housing empire for luxury building.” The Post celebrates Fred C. Trump (1905–99) as one of the biggest builders of affordable apartments in the outer boroughs.
But it forgets to mention that Frederick Christ Trump would have been one of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ demons, since he typically built with the help of the Veterans Administration and other government agencies in redlined neighborhoods, such as the 3,800-unit Trump Village in heavily Jewish Coney Island. (Fred sometimes asserted his parents were from Sweden to sidestep his tenants’ prejudices against German-Americans.)
Fred Trump’s company was rewarded for all its contributions to middle-class America by being sued by the Nixon administration in 1973 for violating the 1968 Fair Housing Act. Only 4 percent of its tenants—in places like Forest Hills in Queens and Brighton Beach in Brooklyn—were black. The young Donald fired back, hiring Roy Cohn and arguing that allowing welfare recipients to rent in his father’s complexes would risk “massive fleeing from the city of not only our tenants, but communities as a whole.” Eventually, Donald signed one of those consent decrees with the feds, not admitting to doing anything but promising never to do it again.
Perhaps that episode played a role in the son’s determination to get out of his father’s business of building affordable housing in the outer boroughs, with its constant danger that antidiscrimination laws would trigger white flight to the suburbs among their largely middle-class Jewish customers, and instead follow the new generation of nouveaux riches New Yorkers to Manhattan. In 1983 Donald proved that New York’s 1970s economic malaise was definitely over by opening on Fifth Avenue the gaudy Trump Tower, which has since been home to numerous celebrities such as Jay Z and Beyoncé.As the saying goes, “Our prices discriminate, so we don’t have to.”
[Comment at Unz.com]

George Soros Gave Planned Parenthood $1.5 Million to Cover Up Sales of Aborted Baby Parts

An interesting story from www.lifenews.com about George Soros and abortion. This follows this post about the demographic effects of abortion. For two very interesting books click HERE.
Please follow me here.


It’s no secret that liberal billionaire George Soros is one of Planned Parenthood’s biggest donors. Now leaked documents show that the horrific videos uncovering the abortion mill’s baby parts trade only encouraged his foundation to give more.
A leaked document recently revealed that George Soros’ Open Society Policy Center (OSPC), wanted to give $1.5 million to Planned Parenthood for damage control after videos exposed that the abortion giant was trafficking aborted baby parts in the name of research. More leaked documents confirm that the center not only requested, but also received the money.
With the $1.5 million, OSPC, one of the U.S. branches of Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF), funded Planned Parenthood Action Fund’s “Fight Back Campaign” as an “urgent response in defense of women’s health” – in other words, as a response to the Center for Medical Progress’ videos released last summer.
The documents came from thousands of hacked Soros files published online Aug. 13 by a group called “DCLeaks.” And while The Free Beacon and other conservative outlets covered OSPC’s  $1.5 million request, they couldn’t confirm “whether the funds were ever actually disbursed.”
But there is proof that Soros’ network did provide cover-up money for Planned Parenthood.
CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!


In a Sept. 23, 2015 memo to Soros’ U.S. Programs (USP) Advisory Board (also under the umbrella of OSF), Ken Zimmerman (USP Director) and Andrea Batista Schlesinger (USP Deputy Director) outlined “select developments informing activities of USP and our grantees.”
Both Zimmerman and Schlesinger worried about the “long-term consequences” of the videos, including the “substantial eroding of Planned Parenthood’s credibility and reputation.” And, in an aside, the directors revealed that OSPC indeed “supported” Planned Parenthood with (surprise, surprise) $1.5 million.
“Planned Parenthood is mounting a vigorous defense, supported by a $1.5m OSPC grant, in the face of four Congressional investigations and a cyber-attack that closed its website … which required the hiring of security for many of its doctors, and otherwise distracted it from its core mission.”
Security was the first topic listed in the original $1.5 million Soros grant proposal to fund Planned Parenthood’s Fight Back Campaign. Besides security, the damage control initiative (projected to cost $7 to $8 million) provided money for legal defense, political lobbying, public outreach – and media outreach.
“PP is conducting national and state media outreach to both expose the true agenda of its opponents and transform the narrative surrounding these attacks,” the $1.5 million Soros grant request read. “PP is recruiting and training patients to tell their stories about the care they received at Planned Parenthood, and are running targeted television ads to educate constituents in key districts about these attacks and ask them to stand with PP.”
The Soros board reports summary section urged immediate action:
This $1.5 million grant provided an infusion of 501(c)(4) funding to Planned Parenthood Action Fund (PPAF)  as they were waging a critical defense against attacks to the reputation and credibility of Planned Parenthood and potential loss of federal funding. This emergency funding enabled PPAF to implement its multipronged Fight Back Campaign to mobilize grassroots and grasstops supporters and lobby Congress to counter attempts to defund Planned Parenthood at the federal and state levels, and to continue providing critical reproductive health care services across the country.
“Critical reproductive health care” that costs not only money, but also lives.
LifeNews Note: Katie Yoder writes for Newsbusters, where this originally appeared. MRC Business analyst Alatheia Nielsen contributed to this report.
georgesoros3

Friday, August 26, 2016

Where Are the "Lost 10 Tribes" Today?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the "Lost 10 Tribes." This follows this post about Political Correctness. This follows this post about Iran. This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

We need to realize that Israel today includes far more territory than just this tiny modern Middle Eastern nation. Most people associate the name Israel with the Jewish state of that name. However, the Jewish people are descendants of primarily two of the 12 tribes that made up ancient Israel—Judah and Benjamin, along with a considerable portion of the priestly tribe of Levi.
After the reign of King Solomon, God caused the kingdom of Israel to divide into two separate nations because of Solomon's sins. The northern 10 tribes retained the name of Israel while the southern portion with its two tribes was called the kingdom of Judah. The word Jew is merely a shortened form of Judah. The first time the word Jews appear in the King James Version of the Bible, in 2 Kings 16:5-6, the northern nation of Israel is actually at war with the Jews! So clearly they are not one and the same people.
After the time of Solomon, these two nations became two politically distinct geographical entities. The Jews are part of the Israelites descended from the patriarch Jacob, whose name was changed to Israel. But he had other sons, and the descendants of 10 of them formed the northern nation of Israel, including the descendants of the patriarch Joseph.
Joseph had two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh. In due time their descendants became two great modern nations, one with an empire that stretched around the world. Joseph's descendants became the easiest to identify in contemporary history because the prophetic blessings they were to receive stand out so distinctly (see Genesis 49:22-26 and Deuteronomy 33:13-17).
The intriguing story of how the modern descendants of the patriarch Joseph eventually became Great Britain and the United States of America is told in our free Bible study aid The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy . Much of God's prophetic plan cannot really be understood without the national identifications carefully laid out in this publication.
Both Great Britain and the United States played major roles, one following the other, in the restoration (after nearly 2,000 years) of the Jewish people to nationhood in the Middle East in 1948. The Balfour Declaration in Britain (1917) was followed by U.S. President Harry Truman's crucial political backing in the late 40s. The destinies of all three nations—biblically known as Judah, Ephraim and Manasseh—are intertwined and will be a big part of the fulfillment of Bible prophecy at the time of the end, albeit in different ways.

You might also be interested in...

Tale Of Two Speeches: Brave (And Honorable) Trump! B-o-r-i-n-g, Paranoid Clinton

A timely post from http://www.vdare.com about the false charge of racism towards immigration enforcement. This follows this post about the Media ADMITTING Bias. This follows this post about Hillary's e-mails and Obama's Iranian ransom. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can follow me here.


DRUDGE_REPORT_2016®_-_2016-08-25_21.31.08

Tale Of Two Speeches: Brave (And Honorable) Trump! B-o-r-i-n-g, Paranoid Clinton


 VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow writes:
A very important speech was given today—by Donald J. Trump, in Manchester New Hampshire. It continued his recent pattern (here, here) of powerful calls for patriotic immigration reform:
For decades, the American people have demanded that their immigration laws be enforced and that their jobs be protected from out-of-control immigration. But the special interests, who only want cheap labor, have stopped it from happening.
(That means you, Bush clan).
But it also contained a dramatic defense of Americans’ right to discuss immigration and crime, anticipating Hillary Clinton’s attempt to shout down such discussion by screaming RACIST!!!!
Trump said [VDARE.links]:
Voters are used to the old game where failed politicians like Hillary Clinton falsely smear Republicans with charges of racism. Republicans then back down. Democrats then continue to push policies that are devastating to communities of color.
We must break this corrupt cycle. And we are going to break it beginning today.
So let me make some very clear statements before this whole country.
First, on the border. People who want their laws enforced and respected, and who want their border secured, are not racists. They are patriotic Americans of all backgrounds who want their jobs protected and their country kept safe.
I will never apologize for pledging to enforce and uphold every single law of the United States, and to make my immigration priority defending and protecting American citizens above every other single consideration. We will end illegal immigration and we will restore the Constitutional rule of law.
Trump continued:
People who speak out against Radical Islam, and who warn about refugees, are not Islamophobes. They are decent American citizens who want to uphold our values as a tolerant society, and who want to keep the terrorists out of our country. If the choice is between saving lives—or appeasing politically-correct censors in Washington D.C., that is the easiest choice I will ever have to make. I will always choose saving American lives.
Now, on crime. People who support the police, and who want crime reduced, are not prejudiced. They are concerned and loving citizens whose hearts break every time an innocent child is lost to preventable violence.
There is no compassion in tolerating crime, and poisonous drug dealing, and the killings in our streets. I will work to dismantle the criminal gangs and cartels and to liberate our poorest citizens from crime and violence and poverty and fear.
Honorably, Trump didn’t even stoop to “disavow” the Alt Right, with which Clinton bizarrely attempting to smear him, although he could quite reasonably have said he’s never heard of any of us, which we all think is probably the case. His only allusion was this:
To Hillary Clinton, and to her donors and advisors, pushing her to spread her smears and her lies about decent people, I have three words. I want you to hear these words, and remember these words: Shame On You.
Needless to say, Romney, McCain, almost any other modern Republican, would have run away.
Transcript: Hillary Clinton’s full remarks in Reno, Nevada
Everywhere I go, people tell me how concerned they are by the divisive rhetoric coming from my opponent in this election.
[Are any cities burning because of Trump’s rhetoric, the way they are because of Obama’s—and Hillary’s—support for Black Lives Matter?]
It’s like nothing we’ve heard before from a nominee for President of the United States.
[That’s what they said about Goldwater. And Reagan.]
From the start, Donald Trump has built his campaign on prejudice and paranoia.
[That’s what Hillary is doing, actually. Steve Sailer has described hatred of whites as the KKKKrazy Glue that holds the Democratic Party together, and points out that it has already led to violence against Trump. Have violent white Trumpian mobs shut down Hillary rallies, like violent minority Hillary-supporting mobs have done to Trump rallies?]
He’s taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over one of America’s two major political parties.
[Calling something a hate group is not an argument—people like us and Jared Taylor aren’t so much “hate groups” as hated groups.]
His disregard for the values that make our country great is profoundly dangerous.
In just the past week, under the guise of “outreach” to African Americans, Trump has stood up in front of largely white audiences and described black communities in insulting and ignorant terms:
“Poverty. Rejection. Horrible education. No housing. No homes. No ownership.
Crime at levels nobody has seen… Right now, you walk down the street, you get shot.”
Those are his words.
[They’re also the words of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and George W. Bush, all of whom have protested low home ownership and bad education for African Americans. Bush actually did things to “fix” them—The No Child Left Behind Act, and a Minority Mortgage Promotion scheme. These were stupid things to do—the first ignores a law of nature, the second crashed the world economy—but no one tried to say the conditions didn’t exist. A headline on Drudge: White House struggles to explain how blacks are better off… Headline from VDARE.com: National Data | Trump Is On To Something—Blacks HAVE Lost Ground in Obama’s Economy].
Donald Trump misses so much.
He doesn’t see the success of black leaders in every field…
The vibrancy of black-owned businesses…Or the strength of the black church… He doesn’t see the excellence of Historically Black Colleges And Universities or the pride of black parents watching their children thrive…And he certainly doesn’t have any solutions to take on the reality of systemic racism and create more equity and opportunity in communities of color.
[Pious baloney. To take only one example, “historically” Black Colleges And Universities aren’t that excellent.  From an article on Myths About Attending A Historically Black College: “Because HBCUs have lower admissions standards and costs than many of the competitive and highly competitive institutions, they must be lesser quality institutions” and “HBCUs are party schools“. Guess what? Those aren’t myths.]
…Maya Angelou once said: “When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.”
Well, throughout his career and this campaign, Donald Trump has shown us exactly who he is. We should believe him.
When Trump was getting his start in business, he was sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent apartments to black and Latino tenants.
Their applications would be marked with a “C”—“C” for “colored”—and then rejected.
[She’s referring to a  1973 DOJ lawsuit against Donald Trump. His defence, from  The Art of The Deal: “The idea of settling drove me crazy. What we didn’t do was rent to welfare cases, white or black. I’d rather fight than fold, because as soon as you fold once, you get the reputation of being a folder.” (Inside the government’s racial bias case against Donald Trump’s company, and how he fought it, by Michael Kranish and Robert O’Harrow Jr., WaPo, January 23,2016 ) Its appearance in the papers is an example of how the media is on the side of Hillary Clinton. Can we have some investigation of what Hillary was doing at that time? Hint—she was helping the Viet Cong win the Vietnam War by overthrowing Richard Nixon.]
Three years later, the Justice Department took Trump back to court because he hadn’t changed.
The pattern continued through the decades.
State regulators fined one of Trump’s casinos for repeatedly removing black dealers from the floor.
ricky[A high rolling gambler refused to play if blacks, minorities, or women were dealing, and the casino agreed. Trump wasn’t involved. Also, this was in 1992. What was Hillary doing for blacks in 1992? I think she was in Arkansas with her husband as he oversaw the execution of brain-damaged black murderer Ricky Ray Rector.]
No wonder the turn-over rate for his minority employees was way above average.
And let’s not forget Trump first gained political prominence leading the charge for the so-called “Birthers.”
He promoted the racist lie that President Obama isn’t really an American citizen—part of a sustained effort to delegitimize America’s first black President.
[Of course this was only possible because Obama was weirdly refusing to release his birth certificate. Plus anything you say about Obama is racist because he’s black. Would it be OK to be suspicious of the citizenship status of the child of a possibly bigamous marriage between a Russian exchange student and a minor in which took place in 1960, under different laws than today’s? Anyhow no mainstream Republican dared question it, and Mrs. Clinton praises McCain for attacking his own supporters who did. Trump just wanted answers.]
In 2015, Trump launched his own campaign for President with another racist lie. He described Mexican immigrants as rapists and criminals
[Specifically Trump saidThey are bringing drugs and they are bringing crime, and they’re rapists. Some, I assume are good people. ” If Clinton is going to call this a lie, doesn’t she have to prove that they’re not? A significant proportion—not all, of course, that’s stupid—of Mexican immigrants are indeed rapists and criminals. To address the rape issue specifically: Mexico is culturally a much more rape-friendly country than the US. See the Washington Post’s Pulitzer Prize-winning story In Mexico, an Unpunished Crime, by Mary Jordan, June 30, 2002. Ann Coulter’s book Adios America has a whole chapter on Mexican rapes in America. You may have seen them reported in your paper, headlined “Man Arrested.”]
And he accused the Mexican government of actively sending them across the border. None of that is true.
[Mexico has whole Ministries and government departments to support their illegal emigrants to America. They’ve even published comic books to help them. About the only sense in which you can say the Government isn’t “actively sending” them is that they’re not draftees.]
Oh, and by the way, Mexico’s not paying for his wall either.
[Trump  has explained how it can be done: by taxing remittances.]
If it ever gets built, you can be sure that American taxpayers will be stuck with the bill.
[Cheap at the price—every Mexican illegal costs America money.]
Since then, there’s been a steady stream of bigotry.
We all remember when Trump said a distinguished federal judge born in Indiana couldn’t be trusted to do his job because, quote, “He’s a Mexican.”
[He IS a Mexican—his father came from Mexico in the 1920s—possibly illegallyand he’s entitled on that basis to Mexican dual citizenship if he wants it. Trump’s point is that he’s could be a Mexican sympathizer, and if you need any proof of that, Judge Curiel is a  member of the La Raza Lawyers Association of San Diego, which supports pro-illegal immigrant organizations. Plus, how come Sonia Sotomayor can say we need “wise Latinas’?]
Think about that.
The man who today is the standard bearer of the Republican Party said a federal judge was incapable of doing his job solely because of his heritage.
[Would you like to know how many Democrats have complained about white (a) judges (b) juries and (c) policemen? When they do, they frequently use the expression “heritage  of racism.”]
Even the Republican Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, described that as “the textbook definition of a racist comment.”
[Ryan is a cuckservative RAT.]
To this day, he’s never apologized to Judge Curiel.
But for Trump, that’s just par for the course.

This is someone who retweets white supremacists online, like the user who goes by the name “white-genocide-TM.” Trump took this fringe bigot with a few dozen followers and spread his message to 11 million people.
[As you can see at right, his “message” was “You always have the best crowds.Another was a picture of a homeless Jeb Bush in front of Trump Tower ]
His campaign famously posted an anti-Semitic image—a Star of David imposed over a sea of dollar bills—that first appeared on a white supremacist website.
[The image, right, was plucked at random off the internet, by a candidate insufficiently paranoid about giving offense. When Trump saw that people seriously thought it was anti-Semitic, he replaced it with the same thing in a circle. But they both have same message—“History Made: Most Corrupt Candidate Ever.” Why doesn’t Hillary reply to that? ]
ADVERTISEMENT
The Trump campaign also selected a prominent white nationalist leader as a delegate in California. They only dropped him under pressure.
[The “prominent” white leader was William Johnson, head of the American Freedom Party, who can’t be that prominent or I’d have heard of him. “Delegate” is a volunteer position—anyone can apply and be accepted. How many felons are Clinton delegates?]
When asked in a nationally televised interview whether he would disavow the support of David Duke, a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, Trump wouldn’t do it. Only later, again under mounting pressure, did he backtrack.
[Ann Coulter wrote of this attack: “Do they have TV sets at CNN? An Internet connection? I don’t work at a television network, but I saw Trump “disavow” David Duke a half-dozen times before Jake Tapper asked him to disavow Duke again last Sunday.…Given that Trump did disavow Duke the day before the Tapper interview, the only explanation for his refusal to do it again is that he was ticked off by the question and decided not to play ball. (Tip for journalists: When WASPs don’t want to answer impertinent questions from reporters, they often say, “I don’t know,” rather than the more urban go f—-yourself.”)”]
And when Trump was asked about anti-Semitic slurs and death threats coming from his supporters, he refused to condemn them.
[Has Clinton repudiated any of (a) Black Lives Matter (b) anti-Trump rioters (c) anti-Christian and anti-white rhetoric from her supporters? ]
Through it all, he has continued pushing discredited conspiracy theories with racist undertones.
Trump said thousands of American Muslims in New Jersey cheered the 9/11 attacks. They didn’t.
[They did. See IN TRUMP WE TRUST , chapter 9, for an analysis of this. She counted “[M]ore than two dozen people reporting separate and distinct instances of between a dozen and forty Muslims celebrating the 9/11 attacks in the New York vicinity, at a minimum of six different locations— two street addresses in Jersey City, at least two in Paterson, and somewhere in Queens and Brooklyn, as Mayor Giuliani’s police reports stated. And this was in the face of a media and political culture determined to suppress negative information about Muslims.” At that point, their only counterclaim is that two dozen instances of between 12 and 40 is hundreds rather than thousands. ]
…His latest paranoid fever dream is about my health. All I can say is, Donald, dream on.
This is what happens when you treat the National Enquirer like Gospel.
It’s what happens when you listen to the radio host Alex Jones, who claims that 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombings were inside jobs. He said the victims of the Sandy Hook massacre were child actors and no one was actually killed there.
Trump didn’t challenge those lies. He went on Jones’ show and said: “Your reputation is amazing. I will not let you down.”
[Trump is not responsible for journalists’ opinions. He also gives interviews to the New York Times.]
…Now, some people will say that his bluster and bigotry is just over-heated campaign rhetoric—an outrageous person saying outrageous things for attention.
But look at the policies Trump has proposed. They would put prejudice into practice.
And don’t be distracted by his latest attempts to muddy the waters.
He may have some new people putting new words in his mouth… but we know where he stands.
He would form a deportation force to round up millions of immigrants and kick them out of the country.
[Of course there already IS a deportation force—but a corrupt establishment isn’t using it.]
He’d abolish the bedrock constitutional principle that says if you’re born in the United States, you’re an American citizen. He says that children born in America to undocumented parents are, quote, “anchor babies” and should be deported. [The First and Second Amendments are actually “bedrock” constitutional principles, and Hillary wants a Supreme Court that would destroy them. The  “citizen child” interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment is highly questionable. ]
Millions of them.
And he’d ban Muslims around the world—1.5 billion men, women, and children –from entering our country just because of their religion.
Think about that for a minute. How would it actually work? People landing in U.S. airports would line up to get their passports stamped, just like they do now.
But in Trump’s America, when they step up to the counter, the immigration officer would ask every single person, “What is your religion?”
And then what?
What if someone says, “I’m a Christian,” but the agent doesn’t believe them.
Do they have to prove it? How would they do that?
Ever since the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock, America has distinguished itself as a haven for people fleeing religious persecution.
Under Donald Trump, America would distinguish itself as the only country in the world to impose a religious test at the border.
[WHAT? Israel has a religious test for its Law Of Return, Saudi Arabia boasts of its infidel-free zones in Mecca—and asks you to prove you’ve never been to Israel. ]
Come to think of it, there actually may be one place that does that. It’s the so-called Islamic State. The territory ISIS controls. It would be a cruel irony if America followed its lead.
[This is weirdly stupid. American consulates already interview applicants for visas. They can deny them on any grounds they want]
Don’t worry, some will say, as President, Trump will be surrounded by smart advisors who will rein in his worst impulses.
So when a tweet gets under his skin and he wants to retaliate with a cruise missile, maybe cooler heads will be there to convince him not to.
Maybe.
But look at who he’s put in charge of his campaign.
Trump likes to say he only hires the “best people.” But he’s had to fire so many campaign managers it’s like an episode of The Apprentice.
The latest shake-up was designed to—quote—“Let Trump be Trump.” To do that, he hired Stephen Bannon, the head of a right-wing website called Breitbart.com, as campaign CEO.
Clinton-Gore-1992-Confederate[1]To give you a flavor of his work, here are a few headlines they’ve published:
That one came shortly after the Charleston massacre, when Democrats and Republicans alike were doing everything they could to heal racial divides. [Really? I seem to remember a public orgy of anti-white, anti-Southern hate.]Breitbart tried to inflame them further.
Just imagine—Donald Trump reading that and thinking: “this is what I need more of in my campaign.”
Bannon has nasty things to say about pretty much everyone.
This spring, he railed against Paul Ryan for, quote “rubbing his social-justice Catholicism in my nose every second.”
[Clinton, of course, does not mention that Bannon is, like Ryan,  a Catholic himself, just not a “social justice” Catholic. Ryan’s belief that his religion requires him to open America’s borders is offensive to any patriotic Catholic, and probably, like a lot of “social justice” beliefs, formally heretical.]
No wonder he’s gone to work for Trump—the only Presidential candidate ever to get into a public feud with the Pope.
[Trump, a Presbyterian,  was attacked by the Pope, who said Trump wasn’t a Christian. Which makes Pope Francis the only Pope ever to get into a public feud with an American Presidential candidate—and lose. See Trump 1 – Pope 0 : Francis backs down over ‘not Christian’ claim as Vatican says it was not a ‘personal attack’ or attempt to influence presidential vote]
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups, Breitbart embraces
“ideas on the extremist fringe of the conservative right. Racist ideas.
Race-baiting ideas. Anti-Muslim and anti-Immigrant ideas –– all key tenets making up an emerging racist ideology known as the ‘Alt-Right.’”
Alt-Right is short for “Alternative Right.”
The Wall Street Journal describes it as a loosely organized movement, mostly online, that “rejects mainstream conservatism, promotes nationalism and views immigration and multiculturalism as threats to white identity.”
The de facto merger between Breitbart and the Trump Campaign represents a landmark achievement for the “Alt-Right.” A fringe element has effectively taken over the Republican Party.
This is part of a broader story—the rising tide of hardline, right-wing nationalism around the world.
Just yesterday, one of Britain’s most prominent right-wing leaders, Nigel Farage, who stoked anti-immigrant sentiments to win the referendum on leaving the European Union, campaigned with Donald Trump in Mississippi.
[Anti-immigration sentiments, that would be. And the point of Brexit is that if Britain hadn’t left the EU, everyone in Europe would be entitled to live there.]
Farage has called for a ban on the children of legal immigrants from public schools and health services, has said women are quote “worth less” than men, and supports scrapping laws that prevent employers from discriminating based on race—that’s who Trump wants by his side.
[Farage suggested that for the first five years after immigrating to the UK, immigrants should pay for their own children’s education. This is similar to the US laws that are supposed to prevent immigrant from being “public charge”, or requiring legal immigrants to have health insurance. Hillary is associated with the economically illiterate  claim that women who earn 76 cents for every  dollar that men do are “underpaid.” Farage pointed  out that if women earn less, they are worth less (note, that’s two words)because that’s what “earn” means.]
The godfather of this global brand of extreme nationalism is Russian President Vladimir Putin.
In fact, Farage has appeared regularly on Russian propaganda programs.
[This means that when the British propaganda network (the BBC) was stonewalling Farage, RT.com featured him regularly. ]
Now he’s standing on the same stage as the Republican nominee….
Of course there’s always been a paranoid fringe in our politics, steeped in racial resentment. But it’s never had the nominee of a major party stoking it, encouraging it, and giving it a national megaphone. Until now.
On David Duke’s radio show the other day, the mood was jubilant.
“We appear to have taken over the Republican Party,” one white supremacist said.
Duke laughed. There’s still more work to do, he said.
No one should have any illusions about what’s really going on here. The names may have changed… Racists now call themselves “racialists.” White supremacists now call themselves “white nationalists.” The paranoid fringe now calls itself “alt-right.” But the hate burns just as bright.
And now Trump is trying to rebrand himself as well. Don’t be fooled.
There’s an old Mexican proverb that says “Tell me with whom you walk, and I will tell you who you are.” [This is known as “Guilt By Association”—and she hasn’t actually got any association.]
We know who Trump is. A few words on a teleprompter won’t change that.
He says he wants to “make America great again,” but his real message remains “Make America hate again.”
This isn’t just about one election. It’s about who we are as a nation.
It’s about the kind of example we want to set for our children and grandchildren.
Next time you watch Donald Trump rant on television, think about all the kids listening across our country. They hear a lot more than we think.
Parents and teachers are already worried about what they’re calling the “Trump Effect.”
Bullying and harassment are on the rise in our schools, especially targeting students of color, Muslims, and immigrants.
At a recent high school basketball game in Indiana, white students held up Trump signs and taunted Latino players on the opposing team with chants of “Build the wall!” and “Speak English.”
[So Hillary’s against speaking English?]
After a similar incident in Iowa, one frustrated school principal said, “They see it in a presidential campaign and now it’s OK for everyone to say this.”
We wouldn’t tolerate that kind of behavior in our own homes. [i.e. any sign of white American consciousness].
How can we stand for it from a candidate for president?
This is a moment of reckoning for every Republican dismayed that the Party of Lincoln has become the Party of Trump. It’s a moment of reckoning for all of us who love our country and believe that America is better than this.
Twenty years ago, when Bob Dole accepted the Republican nomination, he pointed to the exits and told any racists in the Party to get out. [Dole lost]
The week after 9/11, George W. Bush went to a mosque and declared for everyone to hear that Muslims “love America just as much as I do.”
[He was wrong. Polls say they’re disloyal, and they’ve   committed many  terrorist attacks since 9/11,  some of them recorded in our Immigrant Mass Murder records. The exact number is unclear—because of MSM and governmental obfuscation—but there are at least 44 terror attacks on US soil, and an unknown number of other killings.]
In 2008, John McCain told his own supporters they were wrong about the man he was trying to defeat. Senator McCain made sure they knew—Barack Obama is an American citizen and “a decent person.” [McCain lost].
We need that kind of leadership again.
[We = Democrats. Sure they do!]
Every day, more Americans are standing up and saying “enough is enough”—including a lot of Republicans. I’m honored to have their support.
Clinton ended her tirade against  Trump by mentioning two black Olympians. The first is the hijab wearing fencer :
Ibtihaj Muhammad,  an African-American Muslim from New Jersey who won the bronze medal in fencing with grace and skill. Would she even have a place in Donald Trump’s America?”
[Does she want one? She’s said she hates Trump, and she blames him because people are suspicious of Black Muslims with swords. Below is her posing for a joke picture of a beheading. Now imagine a white Olympian posing for joke picture of noose.  ]

The other black Olympian she mentioned is Simone Manuel, a swimmer from Sugar Land, Texas. Hillary said
“When I was growing up, Simone Manuel wouldn’t have been allowed to swim in the same public pool as Katie Ledecky. Now they’re winning Olympic medals as teammates. “
ledeckyThis is what Steve Sailer means when he says that for the Left, it’s always Clarksdale, Mississipi in 1965. Miss Manuel would have been allowed to swim in pools in Illinois, where Mrs. Clinton was born, but not in Sugar Land, it’s true.
But her Olympic teammate, Katie Ledecky, right, went to a Catholic school in Bethesda, Maryland, that is zero percent black.
What is her future, or her school’s future in Hillary’s America? Hillary doesn’t care, but we do, and so does Trump.