Is Judge Susan Bolton Criminal?

A timely post from http://www.badeagle.com/ about the treason against Arizona and the United States. This follows this post about the word "racist" being thrown around in the immigration debate and this post about the MURDER of ROBERT KRENTZ, who the protestors and boycotters won't give a solution for, but will call Americans racist for trying to prevent another MURDER, and this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso. For more interesting stories like this click here to follow this blog.

Is Judge Susan Bolton Criminal?
by David Yeagley ·

Infamous for her flagrant insult to the people of Arizona, and to all Americans, Judge Susan Bolton may have actually committed an crime against the United States Constitution. Her decision against Arizona and America may comprise a more treasonous offense than the pertinacious pretenses of Barry “Obama” Soetoro.


Arizona District Judge Susan Bolton, Communist cohort.

An article in the Canada Free Press has examined Judge Bolton’s decision with clear objectivity, and compared it to the provisions of the US Constitution. (This little task was mysteriously neglected in American news media.) “ONLY the US Supreme Court has Constitutional Authority to Conduct the Trial,” by “Publius Huldah”, appeared July 29, 2010. (The Conservative Examiner picked up on the piece two days later.) Huldah (pseudonymn for a retired lawyer) cites US Constitution Article III, Section 2. par. 2:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction.

The “State” of Arizona was the “Party”, the defendant, in the said suit, “United States of America v. State of Arizona, et al” (No. CV 10-1413-PHX-SRB). Barry’s boy, Eric Holder, was in error in the first place, filing the suit in Arizona District Court. The case was to have been filed, initially and only, in the Supreme Court, according to the Constitution of the United States. Nothing could be more clear–if we’re going to follow the Constitution at all (which Constitution Barry believes is seriously flawed anyway).


Anti-American Communist traitor, Eric Holder, US Attorney
General, appointed by lying Communist Barry Soetoro.

This is called malpractice. The State of Arizona should sue both Eric Holder and Judge Susan Bolton–in the Supreme Court, for treason against the United States Constitution. They both should be barred from practice in any capacity, and imprisoned. There was a day when both would be hanged.

Hulda explains that “original Juristiction” means the authority to conduct the trial, or, the principal right. When a “State” is “Party,” the matter begins and ends at the Supreme Court. We normally hear of Supreme Court cases when they come as the very last resort, from lower courts. In that sense, the Supreme Court functions as an appellate court; but, in this case in which the state of Arizona is named as the first defendant, the Supreme Court alone has the right to hold the trial.

Hulda then cites Alexander Hamilton’s commentary on the specific Constitutional provision (Article III, Sec.2, par.2). Ministers of the state, such as Governor Brewer (named defendant) are to be examined by the Supreme Court. Hamelton notes:

…out of respect to the sovereignties they represent, it is both expedient and proper that such questions should be submitted in the first instance to the highest judicatory of the nation.

This comment is found in Federalist.No.81 (par.13). Hamilton declares further:

In cases in which a State might happen to be a party, it would ill suit its dignity to be turned over to an inferior tribunal…

It is abundantly clear, then, that Barry’s boy Eric Holder and Judge Susan Bolton are criminal. I say, treasonous.

However, “Publius Hulda, Esq. ret.” suggests a more technical, litigious response. She says that 1) Arizona should file a petition to Judge Bolton to remove the case to the Supreme Court, and 2) if Bolton refuses, Arizona should file a petition in the Supreme Court itself to have the case removed from Bolton to the Supreme Court. Both of these mild manoeuvers are anticlimatic, of course. The crime as been committed, knowingly we presume. But, the famous legal anecdote is “Ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it.” And, as we all know, ignorance is no defense against paying the penality for breaking the law–unless, of course, you are a judge, or an attorney. This is the reality we live with. This is the wondrous complexity and living, breathing, “human” nature of our court system in America.

This Arizona case is another instance of our Communist federal government, and its infectious effect on our legal system. (Or, is it the other way around?) One outrage after another explodes from Washington, and from its local representatives in our states. There is nothing these black Communist Democrats in office won’t try. Nothing. The oedipal white liberals who use these traitorous Negroes are in fact the culprits, hiding their own treason being the skin of the Negro, or the gender of the female. True, the average black man just wants to improve himself in the world, but, with people like Barry Soetoro and Eric Holder in the lead, that improvement is virtually annulled. Anti-Americanism will never provide valid, lasting advancement to any people. And Susan Bolton’s weakness just aggrandized the gentle faults of the female species. She indulged her Mexican children, that’s all.

But it was not in her Constitutional power to do so. Selective application of the Constitution is one thing; total abandonment is another. It is the latter toward which Barry “Obama” Soetoro leads, at, the oedipal white liberals’ direction.

Posted by David Yeagley