“American”: Usurpation of the Name

A very insightful article http://www.badeagle.com/ to follow up a previous postabout the work "American " here. You can get more interesting posts like this by following this blog here.

“American”: Usurpation of the Name
by David Yeagley · March 3, 2010 ·
http://www.badeagle.com/2010/03/03/america-usurpation-of-the-name/

The name “American” doesn’t mean what it used to mean. The corruption of its precious significance is a studied effort of its enemies. The first line of their attack is always the meaning of words. It almost seems an inevitable evolution, like rust, decay, or various forms of rot in the world. The enemies of truth infect words.
Last December (2009), there was a notable arrest of five “Americans” by the Pakistani government. It was headline news, and the the word “American” was perverted in the worst possible way. The men were not “American” in any sense of the word. They were Muslims who happened to have somehow gained American citizenship. But only by very diligent search of the news reports could we discover that they were Middle Easterners, all. Two were Pakistani, two were Yemeni, and one Egyptian. This is what they are, not “American.” They don’t even know what it means to be American. They hate everything they know about America. They went to their home countries to join the jihad.
The “American” Middle Eastern Muslims, arrested in Pakistan, December, 2010.
To own the word “American” is the goal of every deceptive, lying, satanic Muslim with the purpose of attacking America. They have full cooperation of the American government and the media, the legal system, and all liberals. This kind of liberal thinking makes tunnel vision of principle, blindness of ideology, and foolish self-destruction of compassion. It is all a social autolysis, beyond reason and even common sense.
The current president, Barry “Obama” Soetoro, of course, who believe the United States Constitution is aberrant, is contributing in every way possible to the change of meaning in the word “American.” American, to him, means a bad thing, somethign that must be changed. He means humbled, denigrated, made into a Third World country, like all the rest. All liberals think this way. Barry is just a lacky for a the real liberal elites, whose power and wealth are untouched by the conditions in America. Indeed, they may profit from America’s demise.
People who hold values which are antithetical to America, the historical America, should never be allowed to become American citizens. Indeed, they should never be allowed on American soil. But then, the liberal debate focuses on the meaning of the word American. Just what is an American? They immediately assert that their ideology is fundamental to being American! To them, being American means to destroy America. To them, no dictionary description will suffice. Dispense with history. It’s what they think American means. If you don’t aggree with their Communist ideology, you are not American. You are some crippled, uninformed, paranoiac, clinging to your gun and your Bible.
We should all understand by now that American citizenship, as a term, means nothing. (Indeed, wearing the United States military uniform means nothing.) These are only forms, which satanic Muslims and liberals fill with their purposes. Forms guarantee nothing, except deception, really. Forms invite falsehood. Forms tempt the devils. They rush in to own. They take advantage of necessary realities. They betray the most basic trust in any social norms and communications
For those of us who know what the real meaning of “American” is, this is all tragic, of course. What can we do? We can be willing to live with distrust, mistrust, and be brave enough to recognize enemies, to name them, and to work against them. That’s all.
“American” does not mean fostering self-destruction. “American” does not mean completely tolerant or irrationally equal. “American” does not mean an open door to everyone and everything. “American” doesn’t simply mean anything anyone wants it to mean. If the word does have meaning, it does so by definition, and definition is limitation, description, distinction, and differentiation.
John Locke said it all in 1651 (Leviathan, Part I, Of Speech):
In the right definition of names lies the first use of speech; which is the acquisition of science: and in wrong, or no definitions, lies the first abuse; from which proceed all false and senseless tenets.
Change, as Communists would have it, is based on the abuse of speech.