Showing posts with label Fat Tuesday. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fat Tuesday. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Don’t Let Chis Christie’s Tough Guy Act Fool You—He’s Terrible On Immigration And Protecting American Workers

An interesting article from http://www.vdare.com about Governor Christie. This follows this post about Mexico and heroin. This follows this post about Pope Francis and immigration. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.



christie

Don’t Let Chis Christie’s Tough Guy Act Fool You—He’s Terrible On Immigration And Protecting American Workers


See Also Chris Christie Won’t Block Obama’s Bridge To Amnesty  by Ann Coulter
His girth aside, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has rarely registered a blip on the 2016 campaign’s radar. The Real Clear Politics poll average currently finds him in 6th place with 3.5%. Unlike in the cases of Walker, Bush, Fiorina, Carson, Rubio, and Cruz, the Republican Establishment and the Main Stream Media has never pretended he was surging and about to take Trump out. In fact, he’s never broken 5% in the polls. Despite this, George Will (or his intern) recently suggested that Christie may very well be at “the center of the stage at the Cleveland convention.” [Keep an eye on Chris Christie, Washington Post, January 15, 2016]. Unlikely—but Christie could impact the race.
With the Trump-Cruz truce over, the Establishment now hopes for a war of mutual destruction. As Christie has been such a non-entity throughout the election, he’s remained relatively unscathed. With Kasich and Bush all but finished, Christie and Rubio are fighting for the scraps.
As I and others at VDARE.com have emphasized over and over again, Trump’s base is not ultraconservative Tea Partiers who hate the GOP Establishment for not cutting Medicare spending. Trump does well amongst virtually all Republican demographics but, as Josh Kraushaar has noted, he is strongest among the “more moderate, more secular, more blue-collar” voters [The Crackup of the Republican Establishment, National Journal, October 19, 2015] Cruz, in contrast, depends heavily from conservative and evangelical voters.
This is not to say that Trump and Cruz are not also competing for many of the same voters. While Cruz is running a traditional Tea Party campaign, he has also echoed Trump’s positions on trade and immigration—going as far as to say he would appoint Trump to build the wall and negotiate trade deals. Cruz has managed to gain support of many hardline conservative immigration patriots like Tom Tancredo and Steve King who likely would be otherwise inclined to support Trump.
The most conservative popular talk radio hosts, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity have been very favorable to both Trump and Cruz—though Limbaugh and Levin have now all but endorsed Cruz. Yet even if Limbaugh and Co. completely turned on Trump and their listeners followed, Trump has a comfortable enough lead right now that he could probably do without them.
Unless a candidate peels off Trump’s working class base he’ll easily win the GOP nomination. Rick Santorum, who is running on an immigration patriot campaign and wrote a book called Blue Collar Conservatives, never even made it to the main debate stage. Scott Walker, who also flirted with immigration patriotism and governs a heavily working class Midwestern state dropped out. John Kasich represents Ohio, the key state for these voters, but his campaign appeals to liberal media elites and big money donors rather than his constituents.
Chris Christie is the only remaining candidate with a potential to draw off these voters. George Will gushes that “Christie could be an alternative alpha persona, but without the ignorance.” Christie’s shtick as a fat, no-nonsense guy from New Jersey who loves Bruce Springsteen ostensibly appeals to working class whites. As Sean Trende has written:
Christie is probably the only other candidate running in Trump’s “lane.” That is to say, while Ted Cruz and Paul could be seen as running in the “Tea Party” lane, and Carson and Huckabee are in the “evangelical” lane, Christie is the only candidate who really has a foot in Trump’s “tough guy/strong leader” lane. He draws from a lot of the same demographics as Trump,
[Laying Odds on the GOP Presidential Race, Real Clear Politics, December 10, 2015]
But despite these similarities in style and appeal, it’s vital to realize that on the key issue of immigration, Christie and Trump could not be more different.
Recently Christie has tried to sound tough. During the debate last week, he said
Now, I for seven years was the U.S. Attorney of New Jersey. I worked hard with not only federal agents but with police officers and here’s the problem, sanctuary cities is part of the problem in this country. That’s where crime is happening in these cities where they don’t enforce the immigration laws.
[6th Republican debate transcript, January 14, 2016]
In the December National Security Debate, a Facebook questioner named Carla Hernandez asked: “If the Bible clearly states that we need to embrace those in need and not fear, how can we justify not accepting refugees?”
2015-12-13-CNN-Debate-BlitzerCNN’s Wolf Blitzer added, in the helpful MSM way:
Governor Christie, you say there should be a pause in allowing new refugees to come into the United States, including orphans under the age of five. What do you say to Carla?
But Chris Christie doubled down, saying
And it was widows and orphans, by the way, and we now know from watching the San Bernardino attack that women can commit heinous, heinous acts against humanity just the same as men can do it. And so I don’t back away from that position for a minute. When the FBI director tells me that he can vet those people, then we’ll consider it and not a moment before because your safety and security is what’s most important to me.
[5th Republican debate transcript, December 15, 2015]
Good red-meat stuff. But there is an unfortunate complication: Christie’s recent tough rhetoric on immigration completely contradicts his longstanding pro-Amnesty career.
Thus while Christie repeatedly harps back to his career as a prosecutor and speaks out against sanctuary cities, he actually tried to force cities to be sanctuaries against their will.
Christie’s New Jersey is in fact one of the most attractive states for illegal aliens. Several municipalities, including the state’s two biggest cities, Newark and Jersey City, and also its capital, Trenton, have sanctuary policies.
The 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Control Act both outlaws sanctuary cities and enables for states and localities to enter into 287(g) agreements to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. But Christie has never done anything to combat the Sanctuary Cities.
Worse, in 2007 Don Cresitello, the (Democratic) Mayor of Morristown NJ, appealed to then-US Attorney Chris Christie for the town to enter into a 287(g) program. Morristown had been overrun with illegal aliens including gang members. One of these illegal aliens killed a ten year-old boy after being twice arrested for crimes involving knives and released without being reported to immigration authorities.
Far from taking the hardcore Joe Arpaio stance, Cresitello told NJ Ledger columnist Paul Mulshine that “We’re not going to go after jay walkers”—but that he wanted to be able to deal with the MS 13-led drug and prostitution rings.
Christie accused Cresitello of “”hyperbole and grandstanding and demagoguery” [Morristown’s mayor was right on immigration, August 14, 2007] To this day, Christie still refers to him as a “demagogue” on immigration.
In 2008, then-prosecutor Christie told a church group
Being in this country without proper documentation is not a crime…The whole phrase of “illegal immigrant” connotes that the person, by just being here, is committing a crime…Don’t let people make you believe that that’s a crime that the U.S. Attorney’s Office should be doing something about. It is not.
[Christie at church forum: Illegal immigrants aren’t criminals, Julie O’Connor, Star-Ledger, April 28, 2010]
While Christie is technically correct that “unlawful presence” is a civil rather than criminal offense, deportation is a civil remedy (as opposed to a criminal remedy like imprisonment). The issue with “unlawful presence” is not that it is a serious crime, but that every second an illegal alien is in the country, he is breaking the law. Moreover, unlawful entry (i.e jumping the border rather than overstaying a visa) is a crime, and in order to function in society most illegal aliens commit a host of other crimes like Social Security and document fraud. [Is Illegal Immigration a Crime?, by Brett Snider, Findlaw, July 9, 2014]
Christie opposed Arizona’s SB 1070, saying: “This is a federal problem, it’s gotta have a federal fix. I’m not really comfortable with state law enforcement having a big role.” [Gov. Chris Christie calls for Republican Party rebranding, Maggie Haberman and Ben Smith, Politico, June 30, 2010]
Yet Christie was quite prepared to addressing illegal immigration on the state level when it came to granting in state tuition for illegal aliens. He surrounded himself with illegal aliens, Democratic politicians, and Hispanic ethnic lobbyists from the Latino Leadership Alliance when he signed the NJ Dream Act. He called opponents of the act “cold hearted” and described the illegal alien DREAMer job thieves as “an inspiration.” [Chris Christie trumpets signing of Dream Act in Union City, Jeena Portnoy, Star-Ledger, January 7, 2014]
Christie portrays himself as a no-nonsense straight talker. His campaign slogan is “Telling it like it is.” In 2010, Christie told ABC News he supported “a commonsense path to citizenship for people.” [Christie: Take my bipartisan example to pass immigration reform, Jordy Yager, The Hill, July 25, 2010]
Yet on the biggest immigration issue that faced our country over the last few years: the Gang of 8 Amnesty, he refused to say whether he supported the bill—or a path to citizenship. When Chris Wallace asked him “Do you still favor comprehensive immigration reform, including a path to citizenship?” Christie responded” “What I favor is fixing a broken system, and the fact is that everybody knows the system is broken. And what Congress needs to do is get to work, working with each other and the president to fix a broken system that’s not serving our economy well, not serving our country well.”[Chris Wallace Tests Chris Christie’s Conservative Credentials, Fox News, November 10, 2013] He repeated that same type of evasion when ABC News asked him [Christie Defers to ‘National Leaders’ to Devise ‘National Solution’ on Immigration, by Matt Vespa, CNS News, November 12, 2013]
And just like the rest of the GOP field, Chris Christie reversed his support for a path to citizenship when his poll numbers tanked. In May, he told Megyn Kelly that citizenship was “an extreme way to go.”
Kelly reminded Christie that about five years ago, he expressed support for giving some undocumented immigrants an opportunity to legalize.
Christie said: “I’ve learned over time about this issue and done a lot more work on it. Just immediately going to a path to citizenship, as Hillary Clinton is proposing to do, is just pandering politics.”
[Chris Christie says he opposes path to citizenship, questions Rubio’s readiness, Fox News Latino, May 19, 2015]
In other words, Christie had no substantive objection to a path to citizenship.
Later in July, Alisyn Camerota of CNN quoted Christie’s previous “commonsense path to citizenship” line and he responded
Well, first of all, yes, I agree with everything I said in there. We don’t have the resources from a law enforcement perspective to forcibly deport those folks, not in those numbers. We simply don’t.
Christie then demurred from giving citizenship but said he wanted to still give illegals work authorization, noting
I have to tell you the truth, I—we have a number of undocumented immigrants here in New Jersey, many whom I’ve met over the course of my governorship. None of them has ever come to here and said that, “Governor, the reason I came here was to vote.” They said they came here to work. So let’s deal with the work situation first, and then we’ll deal with everything else.
[Transcript: Chris Christie Shares Views on Justice System, Immigration, CNN, July 17, 2015]
In an interview yesterday, Christie tried to veer right on immigration again, telling Byron York he opposes raising legal immigration limits or legalizing any illegal aliens until “after we get under control both our border situation and our visa situation.” He also endorsed the term “attrition through enforcement” and said he supported E-verify to “encourage some people to leave on their own.” [A few questions for Chris Christie on immigration, Washington Examiner, January 18, 2016] This contradicts his emphatic statement from less than a year ago that “I’m not someone who believes that folks who have come here in that status [illegally] are going to engage in self-deportation.” [Gov. Chris Christie: Many Undocumented Workers Won’t ‘Self-Deport’, by Charlie Spiering, Breitbart.com, April 21, 2015] As I’ve shown above, this is just the latest of Christie’s many equivocations and flip flops on immigration.
Chris Christie has gotten away with these flip-flops, obfuscations, and just plain terrible statements because no-one has really paid attention to him.
Yet as George Will and other Establishment Poohbahs start talking him up, no amount of tough talk and Bruce Springsteen quotes will be able to hide Chris Christie’s scandalously anti-American worker immigration record.
Washington Watcher [email him] is an anonymous source Inside The Beltway.

Friday, February 6, 2015

Valentine's Day

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Valentine's Day. This follows this post about marijuana. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.



Valentine's Day



In this Bible Study, we’ll discuss the origins of Valentine’s Day and examine what God says about it.

Introduction

Valentine Heart candy , necklace and rose Hearts and flowers, cupids and candy—today's symbols of Valentine's Day are well removed from the circumstances which instituted this yearly display of affection.
In this installment of Teen Bible Study Guide, we’ll discuss the origins of Valentine’s Day and examine what God says about it.

History

Established as a religious holiday, the Feast of St. Valentine honored the Roman priest who lost his life during the reign of Roman Emperor Claudius II. According to various historical accounts, Valentine, a priest in Rome, was persecuted for his beliefs and executed on Feb. 14. Approximately 270 A.D. Valentine became a symbol of love and compassion. Several hundreds of years later when the Roman Catholic Church gained a stronger foothold in Europe and set about substituting pagan rituals with more "Christian" sounding names, Valentine was officially recognized.

"Lupercalia"

In ancient Rome this pagan feast day was known as Lupercalia, the "feast of Lupercus." Mid February was traditionally the time of the festival, an ode to the God of fertility and a celebration of sensual pleasure, a time to meet and court a prospective mate.
Lupercus was the Roman god that protected them from wolves, which were a great danger in that area. So, each year in the middle of February the Romans honored the god Lupercus, giving him thanks for protecting them. The people feasted, danced and played games. When the young men wanted partners for the dancing and games, they drew names of girls from a bowl. Sometimes they became sweethearts, too. This went on for hundreds of years.

Modernization

As more and more people throughout the Western Roman Empire converted to an increasingly popular "Christianity," they brought many of their favorite customs with them, including this "feast of Lupercus". In AD 496, Pope Gelasius outlawed the pagan festival. But he wanted to replace it with a similar celebration. He needed a "lovers" saint to replace the pagan deity Lupercus. The martyred bishop Valentine was chosen as the patron saint of the new festival.
Thus, "the church endeavored to amalgamate (mix), as it were, the old and new religions, and sought, by transferring the heathen ceremonies to the solemnities (observances) of the Christian festivals, to make them subservient (subordinate) to the cause of religion and piety… The result has been the strange medley (mingling) of Christian and pagan rites…" (Chambers’ Book of Days, Vol. 2).
And that’s how the feast of Lupercalia was replaced with the feast of St. Valentine.
Still others claim that sending greetings to loved ones on Feb. 14 dates to the middle ages when it was believed that this day marked the beginning of the mating season for birds.
1. What was the motivation to rename Lupercalia? How successful (on a scale of 1 to 10) do you think the strategy was?
2. But, despite it’s obvious pagan roots, is it still all right to keep it?

What does God say?

DEUTERONOMY 12:29-32 " When the LORD your God cuts off from before you the nations which you go to dispossess, and you displace them and dwell in their land, take heed to yourself that you are not ensnared to follow them, after they are destroyed from before you, and that you do not inquire after their gods, saying, 'How did these nations serve their gods? I also will do likewise.' You shall not worship the LORD your God in that way; for every abomination to the LORD which He hates they have done to their gods; for they burn even their sons and daughters in the fire to their gods. Whatever I command you, be careful to observe it; you shall not add to it nor take away from it."
1. Why does God not want us to look at other nations and other ways of worship and adopt those for our worship of Him?
2. Why do you think we should be careful in our worship of God?
3. What did Christ say about it?
Mark:7:6-7 He answered and said to them, "Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written: 'This people honors Me with their lips, But their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.' "
4. How do these words of Jesus apply to the celebration of Valentine's Day?
5. Did Christ uphold God’s commandments? Read John:15:10 and 14:15 and then answer.
COMMENT: Jesus is our example so we should follow His conduct (I Cor. 11:1).

Summary

1. With what is Valentine's Day associated today? Do any religious ideas come to mind? If so, which ones?
2. What are the origins of Valentines’ Day? Why is it important to know the origin of Valentine's Day?
3. What does God say about how we worship Him?
4. Why is it important to keep God’s commandments?
5. What other days are celebrated in today’s culture that don’t come from the Bible?

More Information

Ideas for Family Bible Studies for Teens

Many parents desire ideas for use in their in-home " Family Bible Studies for Teens ". With this in mind, here are some ideas put together by parents, ministers and their wives, and younger adults, many of whom grew up in God's Church

You are viewing a page from

In this Teen Bible Study Guide, we’ll discuss the origins of popular holidays and examine what God says about them.



Friday, February 21, 2014

Mardi Gras - Modern Idolatry?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Mardi Gras. This follows this post about personality disorders from social media. This follows this post about U.S. energy problems caused by its foreign policies. For a free magazine subscription or to get the book shown for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.


Mardi Gras - Modern Idolatry?

The strange revelries of modern culture have their roots in ancient rites and religion.


Media Download Options [ Download Media: right-click on link ]
filesAudio
MP3 Audio -

[Steve Myers] It's Fat Tuesday. It's the day before Ash Wednesday and it's party time all around the world whether you're in Rio de Janeiro, Paris, New Orleans here in the United States is the party town. And it's the celebrations that are just before Ash Wednesday when people are going to repent and hopefully get right with God is the idea behind it.
[Darris McNeely] Mardi Gras bets up against the period of Lent , which leads up to Easter when some…when according to many religious beliefs something has to be given up as a form of abstinence. And so, the partying, the excess, the revelry right up until Ash Wednesday and that 40 day period becomes…has become more or less just a reason and an excuse to celebrate.  You used to live in New Orleans.
[Steve Myers] Yeah, we used to live in New Orleans and it's interesting Fat Tuesday comes from the idea that you eat as much as you can, you overindulge, you drink as much as you can and then you repent at midnight tonight is when Ash Wednesday begins. They clear the streets. And it's an amazing time. Normally we got out of town because we saw our fill of things just if you watch the newscast and the debauchery down in the French Quarter. People doing unimaginable things just to get little beads to hang around their necks. I mean, it was surprising to see the things that people would do.
[Darris McNeely] When you look at celebrations like this that really have their roots in Medieval history and even in the ancient world, you recognize that in our own modern expressions of culture we have some blatant examples of what really comes down to idolatry and revelry—something that the Apostle Paul warned against in 1 Corinthians 10:7, to the Corinthian church itself a church in a party town. The first century Corinth was quite a…had quite the reputation. But he did say to the people there in verse 7, "Do not become idolaters as were some of them." And he's referring to the example of the children of Israel from Exodus 32. "As it written, 'The people sat down to eat and drank and rose up to play." The NIV translation puts it, they rose up to indulge in revelries, and it's a perfect description of any type of excessive celebration that involves alcohol, drinks, sex, immorality that takes people, you know, against the law of God. And in this case, it has religious connotations at least in it's earliest manifestations as far as what led people to do this.
[Steve Myers] In fact, New Orleans is known for its masks. Well, the masks come from New Orleans where they would cover themselves on Mardi Gras, cover their faces so no one would know who was sinning. And that way they wouldn't be able to hold that against them personally, but they'd repent before God supposedly the next day. But to associate this with religion is, you know, really inexcusable because you cannot. In fact, Paul told the Romans chapter 6 and verse 1. He says, "What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound?" (Romans 6:1). And Paul says certainly not! We cannot. We cannot sin and then think that somehow we can be right with God when we purposely do that. It's unacceptable.
[Darris McNeely] When He gives explicit teaching in this regard, it really is a lesson for every one of us wanting to live by every word of God to look at the examples that are around us in our culture of excess, of immorality, of partying and what the Bible describes as revelries and ask some very hard questions about what we do, what goes on, and how far one should go in taking part in those matters—if they should at all.
[Steve Myers] That's BT Daily . We'll see you next time.

Bible FAQ: What is Mardi Gras? Should Christians celebrate Mardi Gras (Shrove Tuesday)? 
Bible FAQ: What are Ash Wednesday and Lent? Does the Bible tell us to celebrate these days?