Showing posts with label #bluelivesmatter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #bluelivesmatter. Show all posts

Monday, November 21, 2016

The FBI Hate Crimes Stats They’re NOT Telling You About – NOT the Muslims

A timely post from http://www.debbieschlussel.com about true "hate crimes." This follows this post about criminal mayors in the U.S. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can follow me here.


EXCLUSIVE: The FBI Hate Crimes Stats They’re NOT Telling You About – NOT the Muslims

By Debbie Schlussel
islamiccrescent.jpgcolclink.jpg

fbihatecrimesstats


Don’t believe the hype about FBI hate crimes stats. Despite what the media and Muslims whines tell you, the real numbers aren’t about an increase in hate crimes against Muslims. On the contrary, it’s more about how much alleged hate crimes against Muslims pale in comparison to other hate crimes. Here are the real FBI hate crimes statistics they’re not telling you about. Hint: the real victims are NOT Muslims, though they may be the real perpetrators.
Earlier this week, the FBI released its compilation of 2015 hate crimes statistics. And, over the last two days, the media’s echo chamber narrative is that FBI Hate Crime stats are all about Muslims–that Muslims are the real and (if the liberal media emphasis on this is to be believed) the only victims of hate crimes. Nope. Not true.
Most years since the beginning of this site, I’ve looked at and analyzed the statistics released by the FBI. And every single year, it’s been clear: most religious-based hate crimes–by far–are perpetrated against Jews in America, NOT Muslims. The same is true this year. And there are some other key findings in my analysis of these numbers that you should know:
* Hate crimes against Jews are MORE THAN DOUBLE the number of alleged hate crimes against Muslims.
In 2015, there were 664 incidents, 695 offenses, and 731 victims of anti-Jewish hate crimes. This is up from 2014, when there were 609 incidents, 635 offenses, and 648 victims of anti-Jewish hate crimes. That’s an increase of 9% in anti-Jewish hate crimes. Compare that to Muslims, whom the FBI reports had 257 incidents 301 offenses, and 307 victims in 2015. In 2014, these numbers were 154 incidents, 178 offenses, and 184 victims. Yes, there was a marked increase, but still the numbers are relatively very small. With all of the hatred and jihadist attacks perpetrated by Muslims against America and Americans, including on our own soil, it shows that Americans are very nice to Muslims and very forgiving–maybe too much so (which is why we keep getting attacked). The way Muslims portray it, there are constant wildings against them on the streets all over America. Nuh-uh.
In 2015, hate crimes against Jews comprised 53% of all of the 1,244 incidents of hate crimes based on the victim’s religion. In 2014, hate crimes against Jews were 60% of all the 1,014 hate crimes committed based on the victim’s religion. This is the only figure that went down for Jews, but it’s really meaningless. The vast majority of hate crimes in America based on the victim’s religion are still against Jews, NOT Muslims. The media won’t lift a finger to point that out, though. (Which is why I have to.)
This is even more significant when you consider that Muslims claim (though it’s a lie) that they have eight-to-nine-million of their fellow pro-jihadists in the U.S., whereas as there are only 5.2 million Jews in America, if that. Muslims who claim there is rampant “Islamophobia” in America (and–remember!–a phobia is an irrational or unreasonable fear–we have a lot of reasons and rational explanations to fear Islam) are acting as if we Americans are running down every street in America terrorizing Muslims. If you accept their claim that they number nine million in America, then the number of alleged hate crimes against them was just .000285 percent in 2015–a very, very minute and incredibly insignificant number.
Plus Muslims constantly organize and cajole their communities to report even the smallest paper cut or dirty look as a hate crime. They’ve reported my writing as a “hate crime” because I speak truth the power in exposing them. That’s not supposed to be considered a hate crime (especially in a society in which we’re supposed to value free speech and sunlight to expose cockroaches). And, as we know, Muslim-reported “hate crimes” are often hate crime hoaxes, like the Muslim woman who recently admitted she lied when she claimed a Donald Trump supporter pulled off her hijab. Lying . . . it’s what Muslims do. Part of their religion (look up taqiyyah and kitman).
* The FBI refuses to identify hate crime perpetrators by religion or by Arab and/or Middle-Eastern ethnicity, allowing Muslims and Arabs to get away with their many anti-Semitic hate crimes.
This is something I’ve decried on this site each time I’ve analyzed the FBI’s annual release of hate crimes stats. The FBI in recent years began identifying the race, gender, and “ethnicity” of hate crimes perpetrators, but not the religion. Why? I believe it’s done this way to shield Muslims–who I believe would constitute a statistically significant number of perpetrators of anti-Jewish and racist anti-Black (and probably also anti-White) hate crimes. Ditto for anti-LGBT crimes. I believe the numbers would show that they perpetrate a much larger percentage of such hate crimes than their percentage of the population. And, therefore, while the FBI even has a separate “Anti-Arab” ethnic hate crime category outside of the religious “anti-Muslim” category, it refuses to have a separate “Arab” and/or “Muslim” category of hate crimes perpetrators. Instead, the FBI only has categories like “White” and “non-Hispanic” and “other ethnic group” in which the agency lumps (and thus shields from scrutiny and legitimate criticism) Arabs and Muslims. It’s not politically correct to tell us the truth about them and how they behave.
* The number and percentage of anti-Protestant hate crimes went up far more than that for Muslims.
But the media doesn’t lament that . . . or even bother to mention it. In 2014, there were 25 incidents, 25 offenses, and 28 victims of anti-Protestant hate crimes. In 2015, there were 37 offenses, 47 victims, and 48 victims of anti-Protestant hate crimes. Yes, I know the numbers are small either way. But I can use the same magic tricks with numbers as the media and Muslim press releases do and tell you this: that’s a 48% increase in anti-Protestant hate crimes form the previous year. Where’s the media whining and indignation over this like there is for Muslims? (In case you were wondering, the numbers of hate crimes against Catholics are almost double the number of such incidents for Protestants, but the numbers went down–year-to-year–from 2014 to 2015.)
* The number and percentage of race-based hate crimes against Whites are growing. The number of hate crimes against Whites is once again more than double the number of hate crimes alleged against Muslims. It was more than double in in 2014, when anti-White hate crimes comprised 593 incidents, 701 offenses, and 734 victims. And it was the case again in 2015, when there were 613 incidents, 734 offenses, and 789 victims in anti-White hate crimes. Anti-White hate crimes have gone up nearly every year since I’ve been keeping track and between 2014 and 2015, they went up 3.4 percent (as measured by incidents).
You might argue that this it’s logical that anti-White hate crimes should outnumber those allegedly against Muslims, since Whites outnumber Muslims by tens of millions in America. Well, yes. But if you read the media coverage of the FBI hate crimes, it is as if Muslims are the only victims. They aren’t. Not even close. And there is never any media coverage of the growing hate against White people, which I think can be attributed in large part to media glorification of Black Lives Matter, as well as Barack Obama’s refusal to condemn the group. There is also a growing celebration by the media of the ever-decreasing population and percentage of Whites in America. This is “acceptable” racism, and it makes racists know that attacks on Whites are okay.
* The number and percentage of anti-LGBT hate crimes is much higher than that against Muslims. In 2014, there were 1,097 anti-LGBT hate crimes, 1,269 such offenses, and 1,338 victims. In 2015, the numbers went up to 1,148 such incidents, 1,314 offenses, and 1,361 victims.
Again, you might argue that there are far fewer Muslims in this country than those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. True, but, again, my point here is that there are groups that are victims of hate crimes in America far more than Muslims are. And yet the media hyper-focuses on–and only on–Muslims as alleged victims.
And, since we know Islam is VERY anti-gay (and anti-LGB and T), it’s safe to say that Muslims play a role in the rise of anti-gay hate crimes on American soil. We know gays are executed with government and mosque sanction all over the Islamic world. We’ve all seen the pics and videos of HAMASniks and ISIS members throwing gays off buildings and otherwise torturing them to death. And gays in Muslim-domated places in America like Dearbornistan have to live in the shadows, lest they face incredible ostracism and discrimination, some of it violent.
* There are hate crimes against heterosexuals and males (for just being male), but you don’t hear about those either. The numbers are very low, but they are steady from year-to-year and slowly rising.
These hate crimes–which are never documented by the media–exist.
Another important point: were the Muslim attacks on San Bernardino (perpetrated by Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik) and other similar incidents of Muslim hate crimes against non-Muslims counted in the FBI hate crimes stats? Answer: NO, they were not. And that skews all the numbers the wrong way away from the truth.
Next year, the FBI won’t include the Pulse night club jihadist attack against gays and non-Muslims in its 2016 stats. Nor will it include Ahmad Khan Rahami’s attacks on a military marathon in New Jersey and the bombs he set off in New York, even though these were clearly Muslim-perpetrated hate crimes against non-Muslims.
Then, there are hate crimes like the ones I’ve reported regularly to the FBI. I’ve repeatedly gotten Muslim death, rape, and torture threats, but the FBI rarely does anything about it (they take it very seriously when the roles are reversed and Muslims are the alleged victims of threats). I highly doubt my reports have been included in the hate crimes stats. In fact, I’d bet on it.
And that’s, again, why you cannot take these numbers the FBI serves up as the truth or the whole picture. It’s just not the case. Not even close. The only thing the numbers really show are that Americans are not a violent or hateful people, despite what Islamo-race merchants from HAMAS CAIR and others have the media shrieking about. The numbers against every single group in the reports are statistically very low and insignificant compared to the fact that we had a population of 318.9 million as of 2014.
The bottom line is this: the FBI hate crimes show several things that the media refuses to tell us. Specifically, Muslims are NOT the victims here in America. In fact, they make up a very small percentage of the victims. The real victims of hate crimes in America are Jews, Christians, Blacks, Whites, and the LGBT folks. And, if the FBI gave us the full picture, we’d probably know what we already do from media reports and police reports: Muslims are often the perpetrators of hate crimes.
Jihad remains free and clear of FBI and media scrutiny through a careful massaging and BS reporting of the numbers.
The ghost of Osama Bin Laden is laughing all the way to the 72 Helen Thomases.
Read my previous analyses of FBI hate crimes statistics and how they relate to Muslim BS here, here, here, and here.
jamescomeylaughingseenoevil
***
I know I haven’t posted a lot on this site lately, but I pledge to do better. My site is expensive to host because of security measures I’ve had to undertake to keep Muslim hackers from taking it down. If you like this exclusive analysis of FBI hate crimes stats–and other stuff like this you won’t read anywhere else–please do not hesitate to support this site and my work by donating through Paypal via the Paypal button on on the upper left-hand side of this site (or there are other ways to donate if you do not like Paypal–please contact me for those).
You might also like:

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Obama admits 12,587 Syrian refugees: 12,486 Muslims, 68 Christians, 24 Yazidis

A timely post about from www.jihadwatch.org about refugees. This follows this post about "Clock Boy." This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.You can follow me here.

Obama admits 12,587 Syrian refugees: 12,486 Muslims, 68 Christians, 24 Yazidis

This is social engineering, not a genuine response to a refugee crisis. Ten percent of Syria was Christian before the war, and the Christians have been particularly brutalized, often by Obama-backed jihad groups. The refugee population should thus be at least 10% Christian. Instead, Christians accounted for less than one percent of the refugees admitted into the U.S. Obama is clearly pursuing a strategy to increase the Muslim population of the U.S. He may be doing this out of the confidence that they will vote Democrat, or because he thinks an increased Muslim population in the U.S. will end “Islamophobia,” or for some other reason, even possibly including a generally positive view of Muslims and of the putative benefits of Islam for a society, coming from his upbringing.
Austria migrants
“12,587 Syrian Refugees Admitted in FY 2016: 12,486 Muslims, 68 Christians, 24 Yazidis,” by Patrick Goodenough, CNS News, October 3, 2016:
(CNSNews.com) – The administration admitted a total of 12,587 Syrian refugees during the just-ended fiscal year, exceeding the target President Obama declared last fall by 2,587 (20.5 percent).
Of the 12,587, the vast majority are Sunni Muslims – 12,363 (98.2 percent) – while another 103 are identified in State Department Refugee Processing Center data simply as Muslims and a further 20 as Shi’a Muslims.
Sixty-eight of the 12,587 Syrian refugees (0.5 percent) are Christians. They comprise 16 Catholics, eight Orthodox, five Protestants, four Jehovah’s Witnesses, one Greek Orthodox, and 34 refugees self-identified simply as Christians.
The remainder of the Syrian refugees resettled in the U.S. in FY 2016 are 24 Yazidis, eight refugees with religion given as “other,” and one with “no religion.”
The final month of the fiscal year followed the pattern of previous ones: 1,847 Syrian refugees were admitted, of whom 1,812 were Sunnis, 13 were other Muslims, 12 were Christians, seven were Yazidis, and three were “other” religion.
Throughout the year, the numbers of Christians and other religious minorities among the Syrians granted refugee status in the U.S. were dwarfed by those of Sunni Muslims.
Although the majority of Syrians are Sunnis, the number of Sunnis among the refugees was still disproportionately high, and the number of Christians disproportionately low, when compared to the overall population makeup.
When the conflict began in 2011, an estimated 10 percent of the Syrian population (1.5-1.7 million) was Christian and 74 percent was Sunni Muslim.
In contrast, Christians accounted for just half of one percent of the refugees resettled in the United States in FY 2016, while Sunnis accounted for 98.2 percent….
UK admits Muslim cleric who called for murder of gays for series of lectures in London
Iran: IRGC deputy commander says "We have a whole 'jungle' of missiles...We are able to threaten vital interests of any enemy"

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Clock Boy Ahmed Mohamed files defamation suit against conservative media

A timely post about from www.jihadwatch.org about "Clock Boy." This follows this post about Islamophobia. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.You can follow me here.

Clock Boy Ahmed Mohamed files defamation suit against conservative media

As the Washington Post noted at the height of the controversy over his “clock,” Ahmed was showered with support from “Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton and Google co-founder Sergey Brin,” while “Tweets, think pieces and daytime TV segments were dedicated to dissecting how Ahmed’s situation typified racism and Islamaphobia [sic] in America,” and he “visited the Google Science Fair, met with Sudan’s President Omar al Bashir, posed with the queen of Jordan at a United Nations Summit, appeared on the ‘Doctor Oz’ show and last night, made it to the White House.”
Ahmed Mohamed became the darling of the political and media elites and met Obama. He was celebrated everywhere as an innocent victim of “Islamophobia.”
He became an international hero. Yet now he claims to have been “defamed,” and has filed suit. This lawsuit is a naked attempt to continue the intimidation efforts that his clock represented. His clock, which looked like a suitcase bomb, was a strike against the dictum “If you see something, say something”: after Ahmed’s clock, school officials and others will think twice before committing career suicide by questioning suspicious behavior by Muslims. And now Ahmed and his family are moving in for the kill, trying to intimidate people into not even daring to criticize Muslims who engage in these intimidation tactics, for fear of being slapped with a lawsuit.
Mohamed Elhassan Ahmed Mohamed
“Clock Kid Ahmed Mohamed Files Defamation Suit Against Conservative Media,” Huffington Post, September 27, 2016 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
The father of Ahmed Mohamed, the Muslim American teenager from Irving, Texas, who was arrested last year after officials thought the homemade clock he brought to school was a bomb, is suing the city’s mayor and a host of media outlets for defamation, local media reported.
A lawsuit filed Monday in Dallas County Court by Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed, obtained by the NBC affiliate, names as defendants Mayor Beth Van Duyne and an array of conservative media outlets and personalities, including The Blaze; Glenn Beck; the Center for Security Policy; Jim Hanson, Fox Television Stations; Ben Ferguson; and Ben Shapiro.
The 21-page suit cites incidents involving news personalities making what it contends are false or defamatory statements about the teen.
Mohamed, a robotics fan, modified a pencil case to function as a clock and brought it to school last year with hopes of impressing his teacher. School officials accused him of trying “to make a bomb,” pulled him out of class, sent him to the principal’s office, threatened him with expulsion and had him escorted out of the school in handcuffs.
Among the incidents mentioned in the lawsuit is a segment that aired on The Blaze last September featuring host Beck discussing the teen’s arrest with guests Van Duyne and Hanson, the executive vice president of the Center for Security Policy. Beck and Hanson theorized that Islamist extremists or the Mohamed family may have directed the teen to bring the clock to school as a stunt. Van Duyne, the suit adds, did not object to or correct those comments and has continued to refer to the clock as a “hoax bomb.”
The suit references similar incidents with Fox News hosts Ferguson and Shapiro. It demands that all defendants retract their comments and apologize on the air.
Mohamed’s family filed another lawsuit last month against the the school district, the principal of the high school and the city of Irving, alleging that his civil rights were violated….
80% of Swedish police consider quitting over Muslim migrant danger
Robert Spencer Video: Is It "Islamophobic" to Call 9/11 Hijackers "Islamic Terrorists"?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousStumbleUponDiasporaEmailPrint

Monday, September 26, 2016

Editorial: Will the NFL be a Debate Topic?

Editorial

As we know, the NFL's viewing ratings have dropped substantially due to their players insulting the viewing audience. If it was a "freedom of conscience" issue, then those who support the police, such as when the Dallas Cowboys wanted to put a tribute sticker on their helmets, would also be allowed. This bias shows what the real issue in sports is.







Contrast this with what happened to Steve Clevenger in MLB. His pro-police comments caused him to be suspended indefinitely and that was also due to "freedom of conscience" on his part.





Therefore, the real issue is towing the politically correct line in sports. Contact the presidential candidates and the debate moderators and ask for their take on all this!

http://www.vdare.com/articles/colin-kaepernick-vs-steve-clevenger-america-is-now-an-open-air-prison-for-whites 

http://www.vdare.com/posts/steve-clevengers-tweets-vs-isaiah-crowells-instagram

http://www.vdare.com/letters/a-reader-says-the-nfl-wont-stand-up-for-america-because-its-held-hostage-by-its-black-players





Friday, September 23, 2016

A Dangerous New Trend Police Under Attack

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about police. This follows this previous post about them. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

MP3 Audio (16.85 MB)
For many years, the answer little boys would give when asked what they want to be when they grow up has been “I want to be a policeman.” They recognized that the police are protectors, friends, the people who put their lives on the line every day to protect society.
Today, however, the police officer’s job has suddenly become much more dangerous. Police are themselves under fire, battling growing resentment and distrust by large segments of a society they are sworn to protect.
Recently, many have cited a rise in resentment against police and authority figures as the cause of the wave of anti-police violence. What should be our attitude towards authority?
In late August, Harris County (Texas) sheriff’s deputy Darren Goforth was ambushed and killed at a suburban gas station. While fueling his patrol car, a lone gunman walked up to him and shot him in the back of the head, then shot him repeatedly as he lay dying. Goforth, 47, left a wife and two children.
One week later, New York Police Department officer Brian Moore was shot to death when he stopped to investigate a man suspected of carrying a gun on a New York street. Just 25, he left a wife and two small children. The young officer had already been awarded two medals for meritorious service.
Near Atlanta, Fulton County police officer Terrance Green was killed in another ambush-style attack by a man who assaulted a group of officers after having “gone on a rampage” throughout south Fulton County, Georgia.

“War on America’s police officers”

Through early November, 2015 witnessed the slaying of 34 police officers. September was a particularly deadly month, with seven officers giving their lives in the line of duty.
“War has been declared on America’s police officers,” says Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke.
Across the country, police feel themselves under fire, their role in society maligned, their safety threatened. Speaking for the Fraternal Order of Police, which represents more than 300,000 police officers, FOP President Chuck Canterbury said, “It’s almost a radical rhetoric causing officers to say, ‘Wait a second, I’m out here to serve the public. I saved a little old lady from a purse snatching. I gave CPR on the highway and saved somebody. Now, I’m a villain?’” (quoted by Ed Payne and Artemis Moshtaghian in CNN, “Attacks Leave Police Feeling Under Siege,” Sept. 4, 2015).
Across the United States, a string of highly publicized confrontations between police and mostly minority youth has ignited a wave of animosity against law enforcement and law enforcement officers. Major American cities are the battlegrounds, where police themselves feel threatened. A sinister piece of graffiti painted on the side of a Houston building near the Harris County police station showed a picture of a police officer with a gun pointed at his head.
Hollywood has piled on, with celebrities such as movie director Quentin Tarantino calling cops “murderers” over the recent media-hyped shootings in minority neighborhoods. Sadly, the Hollywood police haters and rabble-rousers seem to get no end of publicity in a celebrity-obsessed nation.

The Ferguson effect

Observers have noted the long-standing distrust and animosity between police and largely African-American inner city youth, especially young men. Those simmering tensions exploded after the August 2014 shooting of Michael Brown, a young African-American man shot by Ferguson, Missouri, police office Darren Wilson. Brown had just robbed a convenience store, and evidence showed that he attacked Wilson just before he was shot.
Brown’s death touched off a wave of racial violence in Ferguson’s minority community, resulting in night after night of widespread violence, burning and looting. Confrontations with police produced dozens of injuries to both rioting citizens and the police, tens of millions of dollars in property damage, and more than 100 arrests.
Now, what is being called “the Ferguson effect” has caused police to be far more cautious, especially when operating in minority neighborhoods. The Wall Street Journal reported this effect in chilling terms:
“Almost any police shooting of a black person, no matter how threatening the behavior that provoked the shooting, now provokes angry protests … Arrests in black communities are even more fraught than usual, with hostile, jeering crowds pressing in on officers and spreading lies about the encounter” (Heather McDonald, “The New Nationwide Crime Wave,” May 29, 2015)

Police more cautious, crime rates up

Across the nation, some mayors and officials in cities with heavy minority populations have themselves accused police of racial bias and excessive use of force. In New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio alleged the New York Police Department used excessive racial profiling, a charge echoed by many minority mayors across the nation.
Faced with criticism from city hall, the media, popular culture, and minority communities, police everywhere report being more cautious and reserved in their responses. One example: In many cities, officers now wait in their patrol cars for backup before confronting crime suspects.
Police cautiousness has emboldened criminals, leading to a spike in crime rates across the nation. After falling for two decades to just over 300 in 2014, murder rates in New York City more than doubled during the first six months of 2015. In Baltimore, gun violence rose more than 60 percent compared to the same period last year—its 43 homicides in May 2015 the deadliest month since 1972. Statistics show this pattern across the country in 2015.

What’s behind it?

Events in inner-city neighborhoods have shown that the right provocation can fan smoldering embers of resentment into a full-blown blaze. But is this a new development or something that has been growing for years?
History has a way of repeating itself. With the rise of highly emotional racial conflicts in the late 1960s, police began to hear themselves referred to as “pigs,” an epithet that continued in inner-city neighborhoods long after the violence subsided. White college students picked up the term, screaming it at police who were called to keep order in often-violent protests against the Vietnam War.
We can add the effects of modern mass media, whose ranks today are filled with the products of modern Western education, which denies the existence of any moral authority, and, therefore, challenges all authority.
And we have seen incidents in which law-enforcement officers have acted rashly, unwisely, abusively or even criminally, leading to unnecessary injuries and deaths. Some have been charged with and convicted of murder, manslaughter and assault, among other crimes.
Advancing their own media narrative, television news coverage of the Ferguson incident and others too often demonize police officers, painting pictures of alleged “police brutality” while totally ignoring barrages of rocks and debris hurled at officers, accompanied by taunts and threats. And usually agitators are in the background egging on the crowd.
The picture of growing disrespect and hatred toward police and authority figures is impossible to ignore. But is there an even deeper, more fundamental cause?
Few recognize, and even fewer will acknowledge, the sinister ultimate cause behind today’s violence and disrespect for authority. Your Bible identifies a powerful and evil adversary who, incredible as it may sound, casts his influence over all mankind today. “You He made alive, who … once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience …” (Ephesians 2:1-2, emphasis added throughout).
This being has the world under his sway, influencing millions in attitudes of rebellion and strife (1 John 5:19; Revelation 12:9). Read our free booklet Is There Really a Devil ? to learn more about this being and his influence on the world.

The prophesied solution

Human beings, it seems, have always had a problem with authority, which gives rise to the question: What should be our attitude towards authority and authority figures? The apostle Paul addressed this issue in his letter to the church in Rome:
“Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil” (Romans 13:1-3, New American Standard Bible). Paul went on to exhort the young pastor Timothy to give thanks for “all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence” (1 Timothy 2:1-2).
Thankfully, despite today’s violence, your Bible proclaims a soon-coming time when people will live at peace, a time when God’s law will guide all of humanity. Study the prophecies of Isaiah 2:2-4; Isaiah 9:6-7; Isaiah 11:6-9 and Isaiah 35:5-7. It also foretells the time when Satan, this great adversary, will be restrained—no longer able to influence mankind:
“Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, having … a great chain in his hand. He laid hold of the dragon, that serpent of old, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years … and shut him up … so that he should deceive the nations no more till the thousand years were finished” (Revelation 20:1-2).
At that time, when God’s long-foretold Kingdom is established on earth, Satan’s influence will be replaced with attitudes of cooperation, giving, and true justice for all. Notice in particular what the prophet Isaiah foretells of Christ in Isaiah 11: “The Spirit of the Lord will rest on Him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and strength, the spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord… with righteousness He will judge the poor, and decide with fairness for the afflicted of the earth” (Isaiah 11:2-4, New American Standard Bible).
Millions who today feel, whether rightly or wrongly, that they are denied justice will be treated fairly. The entire world will respect authority and live secure, peaceful lives under the supreme law of God, which will ensure justice, peace and tranquility. God speed that day!

You might also be interested in...

Hillary Clinton Sent “Mothers of the Movement” to Campaign Against Police in Charlotte Hours Before Riots Broke Out

A timely post from http://www.vdare.com about the "Mothers of the Movement." This follows this post about Mexico and Donald Trump. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can follow me here.



Mothers_of_Black_Victims_Emerge_as_a_Force_for_Hillary_Clinton_-_The_New_York_Times_-_2016-07-19_01.07.09

Hillary Clinton Sent “Mothers of the Movement” to Campaign Against Police in Charlotte Hours Before Riots Broke Out


From the North Carolina Democratic Party Facebook page:
Screenshot 2016-09-22 17.39.41
Keith Lamont Scott was shot at 3:54 pm that day. Rioting in Charlotte broke out by 8pm.
From the Winston-Salem Chronicle:
Mothers of the Movement urge blacks to vote
Mothers of the Movement urge blacks to vote September 22
by Cash Michaels
FOR THE CHRONICLE
They are members of a dreaded club they say no one wants to join. Their black children were all killed, either by a law enforcement officer, or someone with a gun. In each case, their child was an innocent victim, not only of the deed, but of the lack of justice that followed.
They are known as “The Mothers of the Movement,” and they captivated the nation last July when they walked out on stage during the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.
ADVERTISEMENT
Three of them – Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner; Maria Hamilton, mother of Dontre Hamilton; and Geneva Reed-Veal, mother of Sandra Bland – spent Monday and Tuesday of this week speaking at events in the African-American communities of Greensboro at N.C. A & T University, Durham, Charlotte and Fayetteville, sharing their pain, and urging their audiences to vote for Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November presidential election.
The Clinton campaign sponsored the mothers’ tour.
During their hour-long session at North Carolina Central University’s School of Law Monday in Durham, the mothers talked to students there about how their children were killed, how the black community must mobilize to stem the escalating tide of police killings and why they individually believed Hillary Clinton when she met with them, and promised, if elected president, that she would work to reform the criminal justice system so that police officers are held to greater accountability in incidents involving the killing of innocent citizens.
Shortly after their campaign stop in Charlotte on Tuesday at 2 pm, anti-police rioting broke out in that unfortunate city.
My column this week in Taki’s Magazine, “Hillary Held Hostage,” discusses how Mrs. Clinton has left herself a hostage to events such as BLM riots and Muslim immigrant terrorism. But her own role in egging on these disasters should not be ignored either.

[Comment at Unz.com]

Mothers_of_Black_Victims_Emerge_as_a_Force_for_Hillary_Clinton_-_The_New_York_Times_-_2016-07-19_01.07.09

The Mothers of the Movement–Hillary And The DNC Go All In For Dead Thugs


Here’s NPR on What To Expect At The Democratic Convention .[by Daniel Kurtzleben, July 15, 2016]
Tuesday will feature the roll call vote and how Hillary Clinton has spent her entire career working to make a difference for children, families and our country. The Mothers of the Movement participating include Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner; Sybrina Fulton, mother of Trayvon Martin; Maria Hamilton, mother of Dontré Hamilton; Lucia McBath, mother of Jordan Davis; Lezley McSpadden, mother of Michael Brown; Cleopatra Pendleton-Cowley, mother of Hadiya Pendleton; Geneva Reed-Veal, mother of Sandra Bland.
The “Mothers of the Movement” hadn’t  really registered with me, but I know all those names.
  • garnerresistGwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner—who was a massively overweight thug who died of exertion while trying to fight half a dozen police trying to wrestle him into handcuffs for selling illegal cigarettes to teenagers.
  • Sybrina Fulton, mother of Trayvon Martin— who was a teenage thug (suspended from school for possession of stolen property) who died during his assault on neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman. His next-to-last words, as he tried to grab Zimmerman’s gun were “You’re gonna die tonight, mother—er.”(His last words were “You got me.”)
  • Maria Hamilton, mother of Dontré Hamilton— who was a maniac (literally: paranoid schizophrenic) who grabbed an officer’s baton and tried to beat him to death with it.
  • Lucia McBath, mother of Jordan Davis—who was a teenager, who cursed and uttered racist insults at a white man (civilian Michael Dunn) when Dunn asked him not to blast rap music from his car. Dunn shot Davis, claiming self-defense, on the grounds that he’d seen Davis point a shotgun at him. However, since police failed to find a shotgun, and Davis’s companions swore there wasn’t one, Dunn was sentenced to life without parole.
  • rightrobLezley McSpadden, mother of Michael Brown— who was the Ferguson thug who assaulted and robbed a storekeeper, and when stopped by police officer Darren Wilson smashed Wilson in the face and tried to take his gun.
  • Cleopatra Pendleton-Cowley, mother of Hadiya Pendleton who was a teenage girl in Chicago. An outlier on this list, 15-year old Hadiya was innocent of anything but standing around in a Chicago  park when she was shot for no particular reason by (allegedly)  these two guys.
theyrenotwhitecops
ADVERTISEMENT
The Narrative on the Hadiya Pendleton shooting is that it was “gun violence.”
  • Geneva Reed-Veal, mother of Sandra Bland—another outlier, since Bland wasn’t killed by anyone at all, but hanged herself in her cell when none of her relatives (including her mother) would bail her out. She’d been arrested for kicking a police officer who stopped her car—an act apparently motivated by the racial resentment all blacks seem to feel when pulled over by the police, no matter how bad their driving is.
With the exception of Hadiya–whose mother, if she wants justice, should be looking to Trump and the Republicans–these are people that only a mother could love.
How hard does Hillary think she can push this BLM stuff without alienating all the remaining white Democrats?

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Youth Violence Who's to Blame?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about violence. This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

In the 1960s Bill Roberts forever abandoned youthful innocence for the killing fields of Vietnam. Not long ago something happened to Bill that brought back the terror he felt years ago in guerrilla warfare.
His recent brush with death was not in a war in Southeast Asia. It happened in Portland, Oregon, a prosperous city of a million and a half people. The enemy wasn't Vietnamese guerrillas but gun-toting gang members in a school yard.
Mr. Roberts serves as principal of a school attended by my children. He is still a soldier, but his fight is with the explosion of youth violence that began 20 years ago in America.
With the American prison population up to 1,800,000 from 750,000 in only 10 years, violence among young people affects every stratum of American life.
Easy solutions are hard to come by because the problem with youth violence is not a trend fueled primarily by desperation and poverty. It is driven by powerful forces and influences that lead some children to treat other human beings as if they are of no more value than the electronic video-game figures they mindlessly kill off by the hour for amusement.
With the lines between fantasy and reality confused and blurred, some American youths have received the unmistakable message that it is entertaining to kill. The two teenaged gunmen who killed and maimed 35 students and teachers at Colorado's Columbine High School in May laughed as they roamed the classrooms and hallways and gunned down their victims.
Does our culture teach children that killing people is not a big deal? Violent movies, video and computer games, and many television shows certainly send that message.
Strangely, many violent teenagers are possessed of a sense of invincibility. Not only do they evince no fear of God, they have little fear or understanding that they could be killed as easily as the fictional characters on a video-game screen.

Explosive Violence

After a 15-year-old boy confessed to the May 1998 shooting of 22 students and his parents in Springfield, Oregon, commentators pointed out that explosive violence had crept from the poor, inner-city communities of the 1980s and early '90s onto the manicured lawns of suburbia.
Not only is homicide one of the greatest risks to our youngsters, says the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, it has progressively permeated the national landscape. The epidemic of gun violence began to peak among youth in the late 1980s, ravaging a predominately poor minority generation of inner-city residents, according to James Garbarino, director of the Family Life Development Center at Cornell University.
National Council on Crime and Delinquency president Barry Krisberg notes a difference in today's profile of youth violence. Recent mass-murder attempts and episodes “had nothing to do with drugs or guns,” he said. “Some were from affluent communities and intact families.”
In the last six years 11 of 12 mass shootings with multiple victims took place in cities with populations under 80,000. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report nine of these were municipalities with a smaller population than 52,000.
Initial studies indicate a shift in violent youth behavior out of the low socioeconomic stereotype. Harvard School of Public Health professor Deborah Prothrow-Stith characterizes the movement of youth violence from poor urban communities to the rest of the population and regions as an effect similar to any other epidemic. “It's the second wave,” she said. “First [it strikes] the most vulnerable community, and then it spreads.”
Copy acts have also proliferated. In one study 25 percent of young violent felons said they got the specific idea for their violent activity directly from television. “I can do that” is the remark attributed to the 15-year-old Oregon shooter in a conversation two months earlier to his school-bus driver when he heard about the school massacre by two youths in Paducah, Kentucky.
Murders committed by teens ages 14 to 17 tripled between 1976 and 1993, then dropped somewhat, according to University of Oregon sociology department chairman Robert O'Brien. However, observers point out that upward trends in youth violence may be masked somewhat by imprisonment, aggressive policing and a dynamic national economy.

A Childhood Jungle

Youth violence is, at its core, an outgrowth of an American crisis of values. Successful child-raising requires values flowing from a firm commitment to children—a commitment that requires time, attention and resources. In their absence, children grow up in a veritable jungle.
It doesn't have to be so.
Consistent, loving guidance of children works. Demonstrating concern works. These parental commitments help stop violence by preventing it. They require a child-centered approach that touches the spirit of the child rather than a manipulation of material circumstances masquerading as attention.
A central message of Jesus Christ regarding children is that they are to be loved because “of such is the Kingdom of God.” He showed that true love works. The explosion of youth violence is a clear warning that time is running out to begin practicing Christ's approach before it's too late.
Most youthful violence emanates from environments in which brutal adult behavior is modeled and acted out in what National Council on Crime and Delinquency president Krisberg calls a “nihilistic culture that does not promote community and social values.”
Not only are right values ignored, but wrong values are often celebrated. “Go to the movies and listen to the music,” says Mr. Krisberg. “It's violent, it has misogynist content. There's gross materialism and no ennobling values celebrated.”

A New Battleground

The war of youth violence is waged in many communities. On Mr. Roberts' Portland school ground, a battle almost erupted because a 12-year-old student had grabbed a basketball away from a gang member.
A few days later school was just letting out when the gang members arrived with revolvers under their coats and dozens of umbrellas tipped with blades. They were ready for the boy.
What surprised Mr. Roberts and led him to instinctively sense he might witness a murder was the bizarre willingness of the 12-year-old with no violent history to take on the gang single-handedly.
As the boy raced out the front door toward the gang, Mr. Roberts grabbed him, handing him over to two assistants who restrained him in Mr. Roberts' office while Mr. Roberts confronted the gang.
In schools across the nation, principals experience such potentially deadly conflicts. Although this situation passed without harm, Mr. Roberts says he feels sure he will see similar problems again. He fears that America, with its random, bloody explosions of violence, is in some ways repeating the frightening guerrilla warfare of Vietnam.
The tentacles of youth violence have traveled across the Atlantic and the Pacific into most other parts of the Western World. Consider the United Kingdom. In some British schools youth violence and disrespect for authority are out of control. An East Anglian instructor wrote an article, “How We Teachers Have Lost Control of the Classroom” ( Sunday Telegraph ) in which he said only one goal matters: “reducing violence in schools.”

Need for Spiritually Motivated Love

Former U.S. Army general Colin Powell, whose leadership helped the American military and its allies emerge victorious in 1991's Operation Desert Storm, says the problem of troubled youth is the greatest threat to the future of the United States.
Youth violence has its roots in a parental culture that has spiritually abandoned them. More money, expensive schools and government programs run by well-meaning bureaucrats cannot substitute for parental love. Western nations so often look to institutional programs for salvation from social crises, but this is one money can't buy.
The 15 million children living in poverty are not alone in a landscape of emotional, interpersonal and spiritual impoverishment. Many children in prosperous nations grow up without enriching values conveyed by the intimacy of sacrificial parental love.
Many of them have no concept of the sanctity of life, even their own. “This is the way we want to go out,” read the suicide note from Columbine High School gunmen Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, who between them killed 13 people in a rampage of bullets and homemade bombs before they turned their guns on themselves.
With materialism substituted for love, many children have no comprehension of an overriding purpose for life, no sense that life is anything more than a quest for instant gratification. They have scarce knowledge of a Higher Power with endless love who reveals a meaningful purpose and destiny for every man, woman and child.
The discouraging social forces affect almost all of society. Even people who profess to be Christian aren't immune, with divorce and abuse rampant. Too many political and religious leaders have abandoned belief in absolute standards such as those that flow from the immutable law of God. God's standards condemn both lack of and abuse of parental authority as well as the sexual promiscuity that almost always leads to single-parenthood.
As a result, children absorb a chaos of relativistic values that mingle hedonism with self-destructive and aggressive behavior.

Serious Consequences

The Creator of mankind has the authority to define right and wrong. And He warns that He will reject a nation whose mothers and fathers reject the spiritual knowledge revealed in the law of God.
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge,” declares the Creator God. “Because you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you . . . Because you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children” (Hosea 4:6, emphasis added).
Youth violence is not a mystery. It is a mistake, a sin and a tragedy for all concerned. But the good news is that the spiritual principles that have always worked still work. Families, communities and nations don't have to be destroyed if they will seek the spiritual knowledge that shows them how to express godly love.
Societies and cultures can change. In the case of America's crisis of youth violence, the problem begins in the home. It is there that parents must learn about and then begin to foster a family culture based on biblical values. Love, if it is genuine, always works. GN

You might also be interested in...