Showing posts with label #DallasShooting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #DallasShooting. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Youth Violence Who's to Blame?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about violence. This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

In the 1960s Bill Roberts forever abandoned youthful innocence for the killing fields of Vietnam. Not long ago something happened to Bill that brought back the terror he felt years ago in guerrilla warfare.
His recent brush with death was not in a war in Southeast Asia. It happened in Portland, Oregon, a prosperous city of a million and a half people. The enemy wasn't Vietnamese guerrillas but gun-toting gang members in a school yard.
Mr. Roberts serves as principal of a school attended by my children. He is still a soldier, but his fight is with the explosion of youth violence that began 20 years ago in America.
With the American prison population up to 1,800,000 from 750,000 in only 10 years, violence among young people affects every stratum of American life.
Easy solutions are hard to come by because the problem with youth violence is not a trend fueled primarily by desperation and poverty. It is driven by powerful forces and influences that lead some children to treat other human beings as if they are of no more value than the electronic video-game figures they mindlessly kill off by the hour for amusement.
With the lines between fantasy and reality confused and blurred, some American youths have received the unmistakable message that it is entertaining to kill. The two teenaged gunmen who killed and maimed 35 students and teachers at Colorado's Columbine High School in May laughed as they roamed the classrooms and hallways and gunned down their victims.
Does our culture teach children that killing people is not a big deal? Violent movies, video and computer games, and many television shows certainly send that message.
Strangely, many violent teenagers are possessed of a sense of invincibility. Not only do they evince no fear of God, they have little fear or understanding that they could be killed as easily as the fictional characters on a video-game screen.

Explosive Violence

After a 15-year-old boy confessed to the May 1998 shooting of 22 students and his parents in Springfield, Oregon, commentators pointed out that explosive violence had crept from the poor, inner-city communities of the 1980s and early '90s onto the manicured lawns of suburbia.
Not only is homicide one of the greatest risks to our youngsters, says the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, it has progressively permeated the national landscape. The epidemic of gun violence began to peak among youth in the late 1980s, ravaging a predominately poor minority generation of inner-city residents, according to James Garbarino, director of the Family Life Development Center at Cornell University.
National Council on Crime and Delinquency president Barry Krisberg notes a difference in today's profile of youth violence. Recent mass-murder attempts and episodes “had nothing to do with drugs or guns,” he said. “Some were from affluent communities and intact families.”
In the last six years 11 of 12 mass shootings with multiple victims took place in cities with populations under 80,000. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report nine of these were municipalities with a smaller population than 52,000.
Initial studies indicate a shift in violent youth behavior out of the low socioeconomic stereotype. Harvard School of Public Health professor Deborah Prothrow-Stith characterizes the movement of youth violence from poor urban communities to the rest of the population and regions as an effect similar to any other epidemic. “It's the second wave,” she said. “First [it strikes] the most vulnerable community, and then it spreads.”
Copy acts have also proliferated. In one study 25 percent of young violent felons said they got the specific idea for their violent activity directly from television. “I can do that” is the remark attributed to the 15-year-old Oregon shooter in a conversation two months earlier to his school-bus driver when he heard about the school massacre by two youths in Paducah, Kentucky.
Murders committed by teens ages 14 to 17 tripled between 1976 and 1993, then dropped somewhat, according to University of Oregon sociology department chairman Robert O'Brien. However, observers point out that upward trends in youth violence may be masked somewhat by imprisonment, aggressive policing and a dynamic national economy.

A Childhood Jungle

Youth violence is, at its core, an outgrowth of an American crisis of values. Successful child-raising requires values flowing from a firm commitment to children—a commitment that requires time, attention and resources. In their absence, children grow up in a veritable jungle.
It doesn't have to be so.
Consistent, loving guidance of children works. Demonstrating concern works. These parental commitments help stop violence by preventing it. They require a child-centered approach that touches the spirit of the child rather than a manipulation of material circumstances masquerading as attention.
A central message of Jesus Christ regarding children is that they are to be loved because “of such is the Kingdom of God.” He showed that true love works. The explosion of youth violence is a clear warning that time is running out to begin practicing Christ's approach before it's too late.
Most youthful violence emanates from environments in which brutal adult behavior is modeled and acted out in what National Council on Crime and Delinquency president Krisberg calls a “nihilistic culture that does not promote community and social values.”
Not only are right values ignored, but wrong values are often celebrated. “Go to the movies and listen to the music,” says Mr. Krisberg. “It's violent, it has misogynist content. There's gross materialism and no ennobling values celebrated.”

A New Battleground

The war of youth violence is waged in many communities. On Mr. Roberts' Portland school ground, a battle almost erupted because a 12-year-old student had grabbed a basketball away from a gang member.
A few days later school was just letting out when the gang members arrived with revolvers under their coats and dozens of umbrellas tipped with blades. They were ready for the boy.
What surprised Mr. Roberts and led him to instinctively sense he might witness a murder was the bizarre willingness of the 12-year-old with no violent history to take on the gang single-handedly.
As the boy raced out the front door toward the gang, Mr. Roberts grabbed him, handing him over to two assistants who restrained him in Mr. Roberts' office while Mr. Roberts confronted the gang.
In schools across the nation, principals experience such potentially deadly conflicts. Although this situation passed without harm, Mr. Roberts says he feels sure he will see similar problems again. He fears that America, with its random, bloody explosions of violence, is in some ways repeating the frightening guerrilla warfare of Vietnam.
The tentacles of youth violence have traveled across the Atlantic and the Pacific into most other parts of the Western World. Consider the United Kingdom. In some British schools youth violence and disrespect for authority are out of control. An East Anglian instructor wrote an article, “How We Teachers Have Lost Control of the Classroom” ( Sunday Telegraph ) in which he said only one goal matters: “reducing violence in schools.”

Need for Spiritually Motivated Love

Former U.S. Army general Colin Powell, whose leadership helped the American military and its allies emerge victorious in 1991's Operation Desert Storm, says the problem of troubled youth is the greatest threat to the future of the United States.
Youth violence has its roots in a parental culture that has spiritually abandoned them. More money, expensive schools and government programs run by well-meaning bureaucrats cannot substitute for parental love. Western nations so often look to institutional programs for salvation from social crises, but this is one money can't buy.
The 15 million children living in poverty are not alone in a landscape of emotional, interpersonal and spiritual impoverishment. Many children in prosperous nations grow up without enriching values conveyed by the intimacy of sacrificial parental love.
Many of them have no concept of the sanctity of life, even their own. “This is the way we want to go out,” read the suicide note from Columbine High School gunmen Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, who between them killed 13 people in a rampage of bullets and homemade bombs before they turned their guns on themselves.
With materialism substituted for love, many children have no comprehension of an overriding purpose for life, no sense that life is anything more than a quest for instant gratification. They have scarce knowledge of a Higher Power with endless love who reveals a meaningful purpose and destiny for every man, woman and child.
The discouraging social forces affect almost all of society. Even people who profess to be Christian aren't immune, with divorce and abuse rampant. Too many political and religious leaders have abandoned belief in absolute standards such as those that flow from the immutable law of God. God's standards condemn both lack of and abuse of parental authority as well as the sexual promiscuity that almost always leads to single-parenthood.
As a result, children absorb a chaos of relativistic values that mingle hedonism with self-destructive and aggressive behavior.

Serious Consequences

The Creator of mankind has the authority to define right and wrong. And He warns that He will reject a nation whose mothers and fathers reject the spiritual knowledge revealed in the law of God.
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge,” declares the Creator God. “Because you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you . . . Because you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children” (Hosea 4:6, emphasis added).
Youth violence is not a mystery. It is a mistake, a sin and a tragedy for all concerned. But the good news is that the spiritual principles that have always worked still work. Families, communities and nations don't have to be destroyed if they will seek the spiritual knowledge that shows them how to express godly love.
Societies and cultures can change. In the case of America's crisis of youth violence, the problem begins in the home. It is there that parents must learn about and then begin to foster a family culture based on biblical values. Love, if it is genuine, always works. GN

You might also be interested in...

Friday, July 15, 2016

Black Lives Matter "Copycats" Murder Police Across The Country

A timely post from http://www.vdare.com about the murder of police officers and the denial of due process to them. This follows this previous post about the terrorism of Black Lives Matter. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can
follow me here.

The black criminal and the white cop he fought and tried to flee.The black criminal and the white cop he fought and tried to flee.

While Black Lives Matter Copycats Murder Police Across The Country, The Persecution Of White Police Officer Michael Slager Continues


So #BlackLivesMatter means #Blue/WhiteLivesDon’t, in Dallas and copycat killings across the country. [ It’s not just Dallas — police officers have been killed across the country , by Erica Evans, LA Times, June 13, 2016] Naturally the Lying Press is now working especially hard, with cuckservatives compliance, to keep the Narrative focused on white guilt [Enough Already With “All Lives Matter,” by Jeffrey Kluger, Time Magazine, July 11 , 2016] and away from Donald Trump’s potentially embarrassing call for law and order. Already down the Memory Hole: the recent collapse of several other BLM Narratives. Unfortunately also forgotten: the ongoing judicial torture of a white policeman caught in one of these hysterias—South Charleston SC police officer Michael Slager. Last month saw the acquittal of the second of six Baltimore police officers accused in the death of drug dealer Freddie Grey and a Grand Jury refusing even to indict another police officer in the ludicrously-overhyped McKinney pool brawl case (but he’s still unemployed) . [Grand jury declines to indict ex-cop involved in McKinney pool party, by Julieta Chiquillo, Dallas Morning News, June 23, 2016] Nevertheless, the Slager prosecution is still lurching forward, although showing increasing signs of collapsing into judicial chaos.
In April 2015 Slager shot and killed a wanted black fugitive, Walter Scott, who had assaulted him and was fleeing the scene. Slager was immediately dismissed without any sort of due process, charged with murder and held in solitary confinement until after Christmas—nearly nine months—not allowed to see or hold his infant son, who was born shortly after he was charged. On January 8, 2016, a hate crime was reported against the Slagers, when two raceless “people dressed in black” set fire to their home. (Fortunately, the Slagers had already fled but the arsonists had no way to know that).
For the disgraceful details, see my chronicling of the Slager case for VDARE.com:
black judge(I like to think this last finally helped cause someone in Washington D.C. to call presiding Judge Clifton Newman, who is black, and tell him to stop being such a jerk).
Slager’s case is particularly mired in politically-motivated legal chaos because it has been joined by judges (and the Main Stream Media) to the wholly unrelated case of white, alleged mass murderer Dylann Roof, the Charleston church shooter.
Last year, the South Carolina Supreme Court ordered that Slager’s state prosecution take place after Roof’s, even though Roof allegedly committed those crimes over two months after Slager, on June 17, 2015. [In rare move, feds indict former officer in fatal shooting, By Bruce Smith And Meg Kinnard, AP, May 12, 2016] In December 2015, Roof was also charged by U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch with federal hate crimes and murder, in what looks to this layman like a double jeopardy prosecution (See below). [Federal grand jury returns 33-count indictment against Dylann Roof,  WISTV, by Clementa Pinckney, December 31st 2015,] On May 24, 2016, Lynch announced that she would pursue a death penalty prosecution against Roof, in addition to the death penalty prosecution already planned by South Carolina state prosecutor Scarlett A. Wilson.
I guess they plan on executing Roof twice.
In April, Circuit Judge J.C. Nicholson postponed Roof’s state prosecution to January 17, 2017.  [ More delays in Dylann Roof trial: What’s holding it up? , By Max Lewontin, CSM, April 13, 2016] Slager’s state prosecution is now scheduled to begin on October 31, 2016, before Roof’s. That’s still an unconscionable violation of Slager’s VIth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Roof’s federal trial is set to begin on November 7, one week after Slager’s state trial begins, but ten weeks before Roof’s state trial. See what I meant by “chaos”?
Note, too, that Slager’s defense attorney, Andy Savage, is also representing some of the victims’ families in the Roof trials. Savage pleaded with both U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel and Judge Clifton Newman for help with the chaos, but they both rejected his motions. Even pro-prosecution MSM operatives have spoken of federal judges “jockeying” for position with their state counterparts, causing what state prosecutor Wilson called an “untenable situation.” CITE
On May 10, 2016, federal prosecutors of the highly-suspect Obama Justice Department also charged Michael Slager with [pdf] federal civil rights crimes—“deprivation of rights under color of law”; committing a crime while using a firearm; and obstruction of justice etc. [Walter Scott family attorney: Federal charges against Michael Slager could be a ‘turning point in history’ by Andrew Knapp, Post & Courier, May 11, 2016.]
In response to the federal indictment, Slager’s attorney in the state case, and co-counsel (with Shaun Kent) in the federal case, Andy Savage, said, in part [pdf]:
As stated by many already today, this is an unprecedented step by the Department of Justice. It seems very extreme and the timing is very interesting. It really feels as if Officer Slager is carrying the burden of many past cases that were handled differently.
This reporter has never heard of the feds laying charges against someone who has already been charged, but not yet tried in state court. The whole point is get another bite at the apple, i.e., unconstitutional double jeopardy. The feds and their apologists maintain that such prosecutions are not double jeopardy, due to the theory of “dual sovereignty,” but no honest person would conjure up, or be fooled by, such a transparently counterfeit theory. It violates the prohibition against double jeopardy enshrined in the Bill of Rights. It’s that simple.
Thus even as Post & Courier operative Andrew Knapp, cited above [Email him] seeks to rationalize double jeopardy, he implicitly concedes the double jeopardy character of the federal charges:
Former North Charleston officer Michael Slager was indicted this week on a federal civil rights charge in Walter Scott’s death, a rare measure in police shootings that gives authorities another route to reach a conviction….
The new charges could serve as a backstop if the state’s case were to fail. Putting him on trial in both state and federal courts for the same shooting would not be double jeopardy because the jurisdictions are considered sovereign.
[Emphases added]
But according to the U.S. Constitution, there is no federal “backstop,” nor “another route to reach a conviction.” (In Slager’s case, unlike Roof’s, the feds apparently intend to wait until after the state trial).
The unique aspect of these prosecutions is their order. To my knowledge, it is unprecedented for the feds to charge, let alone prosecute (in Roof’s case), a defendant who has already been charged but who has yet to be tried in state court. And in politically tying Slager’s case to Roof’s they are insinuating that Slager’s alleged crime is on a par with Roof’s.
The rule of law has been replaced by show trials.
My explanation of the motivation behind Slager’s federal prosecution: a new president is supposed to be sworn in on January 20, 2017, and Barack Hussein Obama wants the satisfaction of seeing yet another white policeman railroaded on his watch.
Given that these are show trials, whose purpose is to set an example for white men, and especially white policemen everywhere, Michael Slager must be tried, convicted, and sentenced as many times in as many courts as our hostile elite demands.
Nicholas Stix [email him] is a New York City-based journalist and researcher, much of whose work focuses on the nexus of race, crime, and education. He spent much of the 1990s teaching college in New York and New Jersey. His work has appeared in Chronicles, The New York Post, Weekly Standard, Daily News, New York Newsday, American Renaissance, Academic Questions, Ideas on Liberty and many other publications. Stix was the project director and principal author of the NPI report, The State of White America-2007. He blogs at Nicholas Stix, Uncensored.

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Indiana's Religious freedom law decried

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Religious Freedom. This follows this post about the police.  For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

This liberty is supposed to be protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, but activist judges have reinterpreted the Constitution to suit their own values with the approval of a broad sector of society. Those adhering to traditional Christian morality are labeled as practicing “hate” and are increasingly persecuted through legal action. Thus the new law.
In fact, RFRA is a federal law passed by Congress in 1993 and signed by President Bill Clinton that was intended to cover federal, state and local government. However, the Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that the law only applied at the federal level. This led individual states over the years since to pass their own RFRAs. Indiana is just the latest of 21 states that have done so (and 11 other states have similar provisions through state court decisions rather than legislation).
Indiana’s bill more directly came about after the nationally debated Hobby Lobby case in which the company sought to be exempt from having to provide employees with insurance coverage for abortion-inducing drugs under President Barack Obama’s health-care law. (Thankfully the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby in that case.)
Furthermore, the Indiana legislation came on the heels of various courts forcing businesses to cater to gay weddings and the like—and the law was seen by some as a way to guard against that.
Not surprisingly, Indiana’s RFRA was swiftly denounced by liberal politicians and interest groups, particularly gay rights activists, as a “license to discriminate.” Various others then began to pile on against the law to escape the stigma of appearing to favor discrimination—and Indiana officials went into damage control.
In an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, Indiana’s Republican Governor Mike Pence said: “I abhor discrimination. I believe in the Golden Rule that you should ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you.’ If I saw a restaurant owner refuse to serve a gay couple, I wouldn’t eat there anymore. As governor of Indiana, if I were presented a bill that legalized discrimination against any person or group, I would veto it. Indiana’s new law contains no reference to sexual orientation. It simply mirrors federal law that President Bill Clinton signed in 1993” (“Ensuring Religious Freedom in Indiana,” March 31, 2015) .
Many conservatives were disappointed that Governor Pence ended up signing a “clarification bill,” approving changes to the law “amid fears that it would allow discrimination against lesbians and gays” (Associated Press, April 2).
Speaking on CBS News’ program Face the Nation, former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum issued this answer to those on the left who say religious freedom laws just let businesses discriminate against homosexuals: “‘Tolerance is a two-way street. If you’re a print shop and you are a gay man, should you be forced to print ‘God Hates … [a derogatory term for gays]’ for the Westboro Baptist Church because they hold those signs up? … Should the government—and this is really the case here—should the government force you to do that?” (April 5, 2015). Obviously not. Likewise the government should not be able to compel Christian business owners to support what they consider immoral.
As society drifts farther from God, we can expect the persecution of those advocating biblical morality to increase. (Sources: Associated Press, CBS News, The Wall Street Journal. )

You might also be interested in...

Monday, July 11, 2016

Editorial: Do Police deserve Due Process?...And Freedom of Speech??

Editorial

As you know, there have been demonstrations against police shootings, most recently in Minnesota and Louisiana. The only evidence has been video feed which was repeatedly shown on TV to incite demonstrations, protests, and, in Dallas, five murders. The two police in Minnesota and Louisiana haven't been convicted of anything, but are being subjected to being presumed guilty by mobs around the U.S. Where is their due process?

In addition, in the city of El Paso, the chief of police, Greg Allen, has bravely attempted to get a handle on the source of some of these murders, but he also is not being given due process. His courage in his statements, knowing that he would receive backlash from the intolerant, shows how dedicated he is to solving these problems.

The #WarOnCops continues to show that #CopLivesMatter, and #BlueLivesMatter are more important than ever!

South Africa Condemns the “Black Genocide” of Abortions in Black Babies in the U.S.

An interesting story from www.lifenews.com about abortion as genocide. This follows this post about the Supreme Court. For two very interesting books click HERE.
Please follow me here.


In a strong message last week, a Catholic leader in South Africa called on Americans to do something about the genocide of abortion on unborn black babies in our nation.



The abortion industry routinely targets black women for abortions. Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business, has been exposed for specifically targeting African Americans for abortions by placing its abortion facilities in minority neighborhoods.
The black genocide of abortion is disturbingly evident in New York City, where state data shows more black babies are aborted than are born. In 2013 in New York, for every 1,000 black babies born alive, 1,223 were aborted. For white and Hispanic women, the ratios were much lower with 265 white babies aborted for every 1,000 born alive and 517 Hispanic babies aborted for every 1,000 born alive.
Many pro-lifers point to Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, as the root of its racial targeting. Sanger was well known in her time for pushing a eugenic philosophy that called for the extermination of people viewed as less fit, including African Americans and the poor.
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Sanger once said, “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
Today, that eugenic targeting continues to be carried out with our tax dollars at Planned Parenthood. Walter B. Hoye II, a black pastor and president of the Issues4LifeFoundation, recently pointed out: “Why should our government spend $1,282 for every Black abortion, when that same amount of money could pay for the safe delivery or adoption of healthy children? If abortion is going to be legal, a half a billion dollars would be far better spent helping young Black women to support a child (i.e., feed, clothe, educate, house and inspire a future American president), rather than aborting one.”
Hoye made a similar call to Napier’s in June when he pointed out that abortions on Black Americans outnumber the homicides of Black Americans by 69 to 1. According to Hoye’s research, one Black baby is aborted every 74 seconds in the U.S.
Abortions in the black community are disproportionately high compared to other racial groups. It is estimated that more than 16 million African-American babies weren’t born because of abortion in the U.S.
WilfridNapier

Black Lives Matter, Obama, Lynch, Holder, Cable TV Have 5 Cops’ Blood on Their Hands

A timely post from  http://www.debbieschlussel.com about the terrorism of Black Lives Matter. This follows this post about IMPEACHMENTS This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can
follow me here.

Black Lives Matter, Obama, Lynch, Holder, Cable TV Have 5 Cops’ Blood on Their Hands

By Debbie Schlussel
dallaspolicemassacre
holderlynchobama
It’s official: Black Lives Matter is the new terrorism. The Black Lives Matter movement has yet more cops’ blood on their hands. This time, it’s the five police officers murdered in cold blood in Dallas and the other seven officers who were shot, some in very serious condition and fighting to stay alive. But who also has the police officers’ blood on their hands? ALL of the cable news networks (CNN, MSNBC, and yes, FOX News) and all of the other media outlets, who repeatedly played video of the two Black men who were shot by police. And Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch, and Eric Holder, who’ve spent the last few years vilifying police and doing nothing to calm and heal America by asking for an end to the cop-killing violence.







It doesn’t matter who shot and murdered the five police officers in Dallas, though we already know that at least one of the suspects is Black. We know that the Black Lives Matter doesn’t care about cops’ lives. They also don’t care about the fact that more unarmed Whites have been killed by police than Blacks. There is no White Lives Matter movement of protesters on the street. There is no White Lives Matter movement that has fostered the environment in which police officers are murdered in cold blood around the country since the movement started its protests, riots, and resultant looting. Remember, police officers were wantonly murdered in New York and elsewhere around the country after the Black Lives Matter movement started. That happened repeatedly before this latest slaughter in Dallas, last night. The media keeps telling us last night’s murderous Black Lives Matter protest was “peaceful.” Um, no it wasn’t. BLM by definition means open war on cops. And we got the natural result of what they’ve been preaching for two years: “kill the pigs.” This massacre of police officers was no surprise. It was predictable. And to be expected.
Then, there’s Barack Obama, who has a history of attacking police from his bully pulpit at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. He began attacking police when he said they “acted stupidly” after a Cambridge, Massachusetts police officer arrested Henry Louis “Skip” Gates, Jr. His “Beer Summit” between the two at the White House was just grandstanding phoniness for the cameras because Obama didn’t really make peace with the police. Since the Ferguson incident in which Michael Brown tried to take officer Darren Wilson’s gun and kill him, Barack Obama continued his public assault of police. His speech yesterday, after the two videos of the two Black men tragically killed by police were released, was more egging on of violence against police. He is part of the problem, NOT the solution.
And then there is the media, including “conservative” FOX News, which have been playing the videos of the killing of the Black men non-stop, as if in a loop. Yet, none of them have played any videos of unarmed White men being shot and killed by police. Why is that?
A cellphone video of an unarmed White man shot and killed by police in Fresno was released to the media, yesterday, and yet it was not played on CNNMSNBCFOXNEWS. Why not? Because only Black Lives Matter. Get it?
But even if the media had shown that video and others like it endlessly, would White people march in the streets across America and riot and loot? Would they target police with sniper fire? No. It doesn’t happen. It hasn’t happened. And it won’t happen.
This is a cultural problem in which Black America plays the victim, thinks it is the only target for problems, persecution, and abuse. They have a chip on their shoulder. The police killings of the two Black men in the videos are tragic and sad. And the men didn’t deserve what happened to them, if we are to base our judgments solely on the videos, which show only certain points in time and not the whole picture. But what about the killings of others? Nobody cares.
And then there are Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder. Their (In)Justice Department has looked the other way when the chosen White liberal criminal breaks the law. See Hillary Clinton, etc. But Lynch, Holder, et al worked overtime to go after municipalities like Fergustan and their police departments, even though they begrudgingly, quietly admitted–as they did in the report on Ferguson–that the officer, Darren Wilson, did not violate anyone’s civil rights. Yet, despite this, the Obama-Holder-Lynch Justice Department shoved all kinds of “civil rights” measures down the throat of Ferguson and its police department, as well as other cities across America. All in the name of “stopping” police “racism” that doesn’t exist. They and the Department of Homeland Security warned of White conservative Americans as the terrorist threat on our soil, not the Black Lives Matter movement.
More Black men kill Black men than any other source. And even more Black men would be killed were it not for the police, in many cases White police officers. If I were a cop today, I’d quit. It’s just not worth it. There is open season on them, your life is at risk, and the pay is low plus the hours are long. Every day could be the last day, with incredible risks on the job. Now, there are BLM terrorists shooting them down. Why do this job?
Let’s see what happens on the streets of America’s inner cities and urban settings if there are no police.
I note that even after police were being hunted by animals at the BLM protest in Dallas, the police were concerned with the safety of the protesters and ushering them to shelter. Let’s see what happens to Black Lives Matter protests on unprotected streets. Chaos.
We need a President, we need a media, and we need a Black and Liberal America who act with responsibility, who act like civic citizens.
We don’t have that now. We just have growing anarchy.
Pray for the families of the five police officers who were murdered. Pray for the police officers who are holding on to their dear lives at Dallas hospitals. May the officers who died rest in peace.
Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly
    

Friday, July 8, 2016

A Dangerous New Trend Police Under Attack

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the police. This follows this post about refugees.  For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

MP3 Audio (16.85 MB)
For many years, the answer little boys would give when asked what they want to be when they grow up has been “I want to be a policeman.” They recognized that the police are protectors, friends, the people who put their lives on the line every day to protect society.
Today, however, the police officer’s job has suddenly become much more dangerous. Police are themselves under fire, battling growing resentment and distrust by large segments of a society they are sworn to protect.
Recently, many have cited a rise in resentment against police and authority figures as the cause of the wave of anti-police violence. What should be our attitude towards authority?
In late August, Harris County (Texas) sheriff’s deputy Darren Goforth was ambushed and killed at a suburban gas station. While fueling his patrol car, a lone gunman walked up to him and shot him in the back of the head, then shot him repeatedly as he lay dying. Goforth, 47, left a wife and two children.
One week later, New York Police Department officer Brian Moore was shot to death when he stopped to investigate a man suspected of carrying a gun on a New York street. Just 25, he left a wife and two small children. The young officer had already been awarded two medals for meritorious service.
Near Atlanta, Fulton County police officer Terrance Green was killed in another ambush-style attack by a man who assaulted a group of officers after having “gone on a rampage” throughout south Fulton County, Georgia.

“War on America’s police officers”

Through early November, 2015 witnessed the slaying of 34 police officers. September was a particularly deadly month, with seven officers giving their lives in the line of duty.
“War has been declared on America’s police officers,” says Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke.
Across the country, police feel themselves under fire, their role in society maligned, their safety threatened. Speaking for the Fraternal Order of Police, which represents more than 300,000 police officers, FOP President Chuck Canterbury said, “It’s almost a radical rhetoric causing officers to say, ‘Wait a second, I’m out here to serve the public. I saved a little old lady from a purse snatching. I gave CPR on the highway and saved somebody. Now, I’m a villain?’” (quoted by Ed Payne and Artemis Moshtaghian in CNN, “Attacks Leave Police Feeling Under Siege,” Sept. 4, 2015).
Across the United States, a string of highly publicized confrontations between police and mostly minority youth has ignited a wave of animosity against law enforcement and law enforcement officers. Major American cities are the battlegrounds, where police themselves feel threatened. A sinister piece of graffiti painted on the side of a Houston building near the Harris County police station showed a picture of a police officer with a gun pointed at his head.
Hollywood has piled on, with celebrities such as movie director Quentin Tarantino calling cops “murderers” over the recent media-hyped shootings in minority neighborhoods. Sadly, the Hollywood police haters and rabble-rousers seem to get no end of publicity in a celebrity-obsessed nation.

The Ferguson effect

Observers have noted the long-standing distrust and animosity between police and largely African-American inner city youth, especially young men. Those simmering tensions exploded after the August 2014 shooting of Michael Brown, a young African-American man shot by Ferguson, Missouri, police office Darren Wilson. Brown had just robbed a convenience store, and evidence showed that he attacked Wilson just before he was shot.
Brown’s death touched off a wave of racial violence in Ferguson’s minority community, resulting in night after night of widespread violence, burning and looting. Confrontations with police produced dozens of injuries to both rioting citizens and the police, tens of millions of dollars in property damage, and more than 100 arrests.
Now, what is being called “the Ferguson effect” has caused police to be far more cautious, especially when operating in minority neighborhoods. The Wall Street Journal reported this effect in chilling terms:
“Almost any police shooting of a black person, no matter how threatening the behavior that provoked the shooting, now provokes angry protests … Arrests in black communities are even more fraught than usual, with hostile, jeering crowds pressing in on officers and spreading lies about the encounter” (Heather McDonald, “The New Nationwide Crime Wave,” May 29, 2015)

Police more cautious, crime rates up

Across the nation, some mayors and officials in cities with heavy minority populations have themselves accused police of racial bias and excessive use of force. In New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio alleged the New York Police Department used excessive racial profiling, a charge echoed by many minority mayors across the nation.
Faced with criticism from city hall, the media, popular culture, and minority communities, police everywhere report being more cautious and reserved in their responses. One example: In many cities, officers now wait in their patrol cars for backup before confronting crime suspects.
Police cautiousness has emboldened criminals, leading to a spike in crime rates across the nation. After falling for two decades to just over 300 in 2014, murder rates in New York City more than doubled during the first six months of 2015. In Baltimore, gun violence rose more than 60 percent compared to the same period last year—its 43 homicides in May 2015 the deadliest month since 1972. Statistics show this pattern across the country in 2015.

What’s behind it?

Events in inner-city neighborhoods have shown that the right provocation can fan smoldering embers of resentment into a full-blown blaze. But is this a new development or something that has been growing for years?
History has a way of repeating itself. With the rise of highly emotional racial conflicts in the late 1960s, police began to hear themselves referred to as “pigs,” an epithet that continued in inner-city neighborhoods long after the violence subsided. White college students picked up the term, screaming it at police who were called to keep order in often-violent protests against the Vietnam War.
We can add the effects of modern mass media, whose ranks today are filled with the products of modern Western education, which denies the existence of any moral authority, and, therefore, challenges all authority.
And we have seen incidents in which law-enforcement officers have acted rashly, unwisely, abusively or even criminally, leading to unnecessary injuries and deaths. Some have been charged with and convicted of murder, manslaughter and assault, among other crimes.
Advancing their own media narrative, television news coverage of the Ferguson incident and others too often demonize police officers, painting pictures of alleged “police brutality” while totally ignoring barrages of rocks and debris hurled at officers, accompanied by taunts and threats. And usually agitators are in the background egging on the crowd.
The picture of growing disrespect and hatred toward police and authority figures is impossible to ignore. But is there an even deeper, more fundamental cause?
Few recognize, and even fewer will acknowledge, the sinister ultimate cause behind today’s violence and disrespect for authority. Your Bible identifies a powerful and evil adversary who, incredible as it may sound, casts his influence over all mankind today. “You He made alive, who … once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience …” (Ephesians 2:1-2, emphasis added throughout).
This being has the world under his sway, influencing millions in attitudes of rebellion and strife (1 John 5:19; Revelation 12:9). Read our free booklet Is There Really a Devil ? to learn more about this being and his influence on the world.

The prophesied solution

Human beings, it seems, have always had a problem with authority, which gives rise to the question: What should be our attitude towards authority and authority figures? The apostle Paul addressed this issue in his letter to the church in Rome:
“Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil” (Romans 13:1-3, New American Standard Bible). Paul went on to exhort the young pastor Timothy to give thanks for “all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence” (1 Timothy 2:1-2).
Thankfully, despite today’s violence, your Bible proclaims a soon-coming time when people will live at peace, a time when God’s law will guide all of humanity. Study the prophecies of Isaiah 2:2-4; Isaiah 9:6-7; Isaiah 11:6-9 and Isaiah 35:5-7. It also foretells the time when Satan, this great adversary, will be restrained—no longer able to influence mankind:
“Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, having … a great chain in his hand. He laid hold of the dragon, that serpent of old, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years … and shut him up … so that he should deceive the nations no more till the thousand years were finished” (Revelation 20:1-2).
At that time, when God’s long-foretold Kingdom is established on earth, Satan’s influence will be replaced with attitudes of cooperation, giving, and true justice for all. Notice in particular what the prophet Isaiah foretells of Christ in Isaiah 11: “The Spirit of the Lord will rest on Him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and strength, the spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord… with righteousness He will judge the poor, and decide with fairness for the afflicted of the earth” (Isaiah 11:2-4, New American Standard Bible).
Millions who today feel, whether rightly or wrongly, that they are denied justice will be treated fairly. The entire world will respect authority and live secure, peaceful lives under the supreme law of God, which will ensure justice, peace and tranquility. God speed that day!

You might also be interested in...