Thursday, April 21, 2011

Efforts to defund Planned Parenthood move to state level

An interesting story from www.LifeSiteNews.com about defunding Planned Parenthood at the state level. This follows this post about a the budget deal allowing a vote on abortion! For more that you can do to get involved click  HERE and you can also get a very interesting book HERE!

Efforts to defund Planned Parenthood move to state level


by Christine Dhanagom


 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Days after Republican Congressmen in Washington abandoned the effort to strip Planned Parenthood of its federal funds, the battle continues in state legislatures across the country.



In North Carolina, Republicans added a provision to the state budget last week that would prohibit the state from providing grants or entering into contracts with Planned Parenthood, a measure which would deprive the organization of the $473,000 it currently receives through state family planning programs.



Representative Nelson Dollar, chairman of the House appropriation subcommittee for Health and Human Services, told the Raleigh News and Observer newspaper that the provision is unrelated to the issue of abortion.



“There are a whole host of programs being reduced. Planned Parenthood is not unique,” he said, adding that the proposed budget still allocated $3.6 million towards other teen pregnancy prevention programs.



A similar measure prohibiting state grants and contracts with Planned Parenthood was added to a pro-life bill in Indiana yesterday. According to an Associated Press report, Planned Parenthood is currently receiving $3 million in Indiana state funds.



The larger bill of which the funding provision is now a part, HB 1210, would also prohibit abortions after 20 weeks gestation. The current legal cut-off in Indiana is 24 weeks. The bill has yet to be voted on by the state Senate.



Also on Monday, Minnesota Republicans introduced SF 1224, a bill that does not mention Planned Parenthood by name, but which prohibits state grant funds from being given to any organization that provides abortions or refers patients for abortion.



If passed, the bill would remove state funds from all of the 24 clinics that Planned Parenthood operates in Minnesota.



This past week’s legislation mirrors other recent efforts in Wisconsin and New Hampshire to keep Planned Parenthood from receiving fund from state coffers. Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker unveiled a budget proposal in early March which eliminates the Title V Maternal and Child Health Program. Title V is the source of roughly $1 million in funding for Planned Parenthood’s 27 Wisconsin clinics, according to the Huffington Post.



The proposed budget is currently stalled by tense debate over its radical overhaul of state finances, including cuts in education, and health-care and pension plans for public employees.



Legislative efforts in New Hampshire have also come to a standstill, after a bill specifically targeting Planned Parenthood was introduced in early February. HB 228 would, like the North Carolina and Indiana legislation, prohibit the state from entering into a contract with Planned Parenthood; it is currently retained in committee in the House.



Planned Parenthood stands to lose approximately $800,000 if the New Hampshire legislation is passed.



The national abortion giant is firing back against the threats to its state funding across the country with claims that it does not use government money to subsidize abortion but rather to provide seemingly non-controversial health services.



According to the Daily Tar Heel, Paige Johnson, spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood Central North Carolina, said that the loss of funding in the state would inhibit access of low-income women to mammograms and birth control.



Johnson’s statement is similar to one made by Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards during the Congressional debate over federal funding for the organization. In an appearance on The Joy Behar Show, Richards listed mammograms among the “basic family planning services” that Planned Parenthood provides.



However, a series of undercover phone calls by the pro-life group Live Action to 30 Planned Parenthood clinics in 27 different states found that the organization does not, in fact, offer mammograms.



According to Jim Sedlak, Executive Director of Stop Planned Parenthood (STOPP), even Planned Parenthood non-abortion-related programs, such as birth control services and sex education, are still not uncontroversial.



“Planned Parenthood comes between parents and their children and indoctrinates children into a sexual lifestyle that is against the religion of most parents, and so, for that reason, many, many parents who actually would not join us on the abortion battle join us in the battle against Planned Parenthood,” Sedlak told LifeSiteNews.



Sedlak also said that most of the contraceptives that Planned Parenthood provides are actually abortificients, because they prevent the implantation in the womb of a fertilized egg, resulting in the death of a newly created human being.



“People around the country have for years been fighting against taxpayer money for Planned Parenthood at the local level of cities and counties, and they have had a large number of successes, and now that battle has moved up to the state level and federal level, which is where it needs to be. We see this as an exciting development in the fight against Planned Parenthood, and it will eventually be successful,” he added.

Rep. King demands answers about non-prosecution of Hamas-linked CAIR; CAIR's Hooper complains

A very interesting post from http://www.jihadwatch.org/  about efforts to resist jihad around the world. This follows this post about the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.This follows this post  about Miss USA 2010 and this article about the recent news about the former ban on offshore drilling which would encourage American energy independence and prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran   and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and read this very interesting book HERE!

Rep. King demands answers about non-prosecution of Hamas-linked CAIR; CAIR's Hooper complains


A press release from Anti-CAIR:


Rep. King Demands Answers; Ibrahim Hooper Complains

On April 18, The House Committee on Homeland Security issued a press release detailing Rep. King’s call for answers from the Department Of Justice regarding non-prosecution of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad in the notorious Holy Land Foundation trial.



Specifically, Rep. King wants to know why the DOJ has given CAIR, founder Omar Ahmad, and other unindicted co-conspirators such as the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), among others, a “free pass” considering the ample evidence against them presented at the Holy Land trial.



Previously, CAIR, and other unindicted co-conspirators, had asked the court to strike them from the unindicted co-conspirator list in both August 2007 and June 2008. Judge Solis declined CAIR, ISNA, and NAIT’s (among others) petition based on sufficient evidence showing links between these groups and the terrorist group Hamas. Hamas is well-known for engaging in very low risk suicide bombings against Israeli targets, among other cowardly acts that are the hallmark of Islamist terrorist groups.



Predictably, CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper described Rep. King’s letter as “an obvious attempt at political payback for criticism of the anti-Muslim bias in Mr. King’s recent hearing…It is sad the Representative King’s personal vendetta against the American Muslim community has led him to become a mouthpiece for anti-Islam hate sites.”



The evidence of CAIR's creation and support for Hamas is vast, clear, and overwhelming. It is worth noting that Ibrahim Hooper has not demanded proof that CAIR and its founders engaged in terrorist or terrorist supporting activities. CAIR and Omar Ahmad's guilt is so obvious that CAIR's only choice is to deny and make counter accusations.



If Ibrahim Hooper and CAIR hold any evidence, however slim, that CAIR is not guilty of the acts accused, CAIR should file a lawsuit to have its “good name” cleared.



However, we all know how well that worked out for CAIR last time.



Care to respond, Mr. Hooper?



Andrew Whitehead

Director

Anti-CAIR

ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.org

http://www.anti-cair-net.org/



Posted by Robert

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Call & Ask Lt. Gov. Dewhurst to Push State E-Verify Bill‏

An urgent post from www.NumbersUSA.com about immigration bills in the key state of Texas. This follows this post about congressional redistricting and this follows this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso. On a related note, you can read about Miss Kentucky Latina here, an interesting article about Jessica Alba here or another article about Salma Hayek here. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!




Call & Urge Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst to Back E-Verify Legislation






Dear Activist:






SB 84, legislation that would require government entities and government contractors and subcontractors to run their employees through the E-Verify employment verification system, has been stuck in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee since January 31. Committee Chairman Tommy Williams and other Senate leaders, unfortunately, seem disinclined to push the bill forward even though there is not much time left in the current legislative session. Please call Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst (the Texas Senate President) and Committee Chairman Tommy Williams and urge them to press forward with SB 84. Also, if you have time, please consider phoning the Senators on the Transportation and Homeland Security Committee and urge them to push the bill as well. Phone numbers and talking points are below.






Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst: 512-463-0001


Committee Chairman Sen. Tommy Williams: 512-463-0104






Committee Members:


Sen. Kirk Watson: 512-463-0114


Sen. Wendy Davis: 512-463-0110


Sen. Rodney Ellis: 512-463-0113


Sen. Chris Harris: 512-463-0109


Sen. Juan Hinojosa: 512-463-0120


Sen. Robert Nichols: 512-463-0103


Sen. Florence Shapiro: 512-463-0108


Sen. Jeff Wentworth: 512-463-0125






Suggested talking points:






E-Verify is fast, free, and 99.7% accurate. There is no reason why Texas employers should not use it!










Texans are sitting unemployed while greedy businesses hire illegal aliens. Don't you think this is unjust and unfair? Please push for a vote on SB 84 so that more Texas are able to find jobs










SB 84 would prevent taxpayer dollars from going towards the hiring of illegal aliens. I'm sure you agree that all Texans agree that jobs funded by Texans should go to Texans and not illegal aliens. Please push for a vote on the bill in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee so that it can progress to the Senate floor.














Thank you!


What Was the Purpose of Christ's Death?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Jesus Christ. This follows this post about Easter celebrations.  For a free magazine subscription or to get this book for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886-8632.


What Was the Purpose of Christ's Death?


Millions of Christians believe that Jesus Christ died for them. But do they really know why? Why was Jesus Christ's death really necessary?

by Jerold Aust

Most Christians, if asked what makes them a Christian, would respond something like this:"I know that Jesus is the Son of God who died for my sins, and I accept His shed blood for my sins."



While Jesus did die for us, is that all there is to this belief? Does the Bible tell us that there's more to the story?



A sacrifice for humanity's sins

Many Bible passages show why Jesus died for humankind. Let's look at a few.



The apostle Paul wrote that we are to"walk in love, as Christ also has loved us and given Himself for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling aroma" (Ephesians 5:2, emphasis added throughout).



To the Christians in Rome, Paul explained:"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation [atoning sacrifice] by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed" (Romans 3:23-25).



Later in the same letter, Paul wrote:"But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us . Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him" (Romans 5:8-9).



To the Corinthian church Paul explained that God the Father "made Him who knew no sin [Jesus Christ] to be sin for us" (2 Corinthians 5:21). Here the clear implication is that Jesus took our guilt on Himself and paid the penalty for us by His death.



The book of Revelation opens by describing Jesus Christ as the One "who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood" (Revelation 1:5).



The apostle John also explained the reason for Jesus' death:"If anyone does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous; and he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 John 2:1-2, New Revised Standard Version).



A little later he explained:"God's love was revealed among us in this way: God sent his only Son into the world so that we might live through him. In this is love, not that we loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the atoning sacrifice for our sins" (1 John 4:9-10, NRSV).



And also:"We have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son as Savior of the world" (verse 14).



The apostle Peter confirmed this great truth, that Jesus Christ "bore our sins in His own body on the tree, that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness" (1 Peter 2:24).



The prophet Isaiah wrote of the purpose of Jesus' death centuries before it actually took place:"He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement for our peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed" (Isaiah 53:5).



Scripture is very clear about the fact that Jesus had to die for all people of all time and for crucial reasons. He had to die because of human sin—yours, mine and everyone else's.



Sin brought on Jesus' death

The scriptures quoted above show the necessity of Jesus' death—that it was required because of sin. Without sin, there would be no need for Jesus' death, the shedding of His sinless blood.



Sin is the violation of God's law (1 John 3:4). It requires a price to be paid because, as Romans 6:23 tells us,"The wages of sin is death." Without some payment for that awful penalty, human beings would face oblivion through death with no hope beyond the grave .



The New Testament letter to the Hebrews states plainly that"without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins" (9:22, NRSV). One purpose for this letter was to explain that Jesus Christ was the very Son of God and that He gave His life's blood for the remission—the forgiveness, the pardon, the penalty removal—of humankind's sins.



The recipients of this letter were quite familiar with the Old Testament sacrifices that, as the epistle explains, foreshadowed the one holy sacrifice of mankind's Savior:"He has appeared once for all at the end of the age to remove sin by the sacrifice of himself" (Hebrews 9:26, NRSV).



Human beings must have their sins washed away, pardoned and forgiven, to be reconciled to God."For if while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, much more surely, having been reconciled, will we be saved by his life" (Romans 5:10, NRSV). Without reconciliation to God the Father, there could be no forgiveness of sins.



Hebrews 9:28 further explains that"Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him" (New International Version). A sinless Jesus became sin for us as we've seen (2 Corinthians 5:21). He took on the sins of humankind to save us from everlasting death.



How sin began

Considering that sin is so terrible and destructive that we need a Savior to atone for us, just how did sin begin?



The archangel Lucifer, since known as Satan, was the first to sin against God, the first to break His laws (see Ezekiel 28:15-16). Ironically, Satan has since influenced the world to think that mankind was the first to sin. Adam and Eve did sin, but they weren't the first to sin. Satan had already rebelled against God and was waiting there in the Garden of Eden to plant his lies in their thinking (John 8:42-44).



Eve and Adam were the first human beings to sin against God, and since then all human beings have sinned in like manner (Romans 5:12). Most people find it difficult to acknowledge sin; they simply act as if it didn't exist. But sin is destructive. If God had not provided us with a solution, eventually it would destroy all mankind.



Today, God"commands all men everywhere to repent" (Acts 17:30)—to stop sinning, to cease from breaking His laws.



Since no human being can obey God's laws perfectly without sinning, God extends grace to the repentant, pardoning them for their sins.



Law and grace go together

Most Christians today find it difficult to understand the relationship between God's grace and God's laws. The view most commonly held is,"If there's something we must actually do to be forgiven, then grace is meaningless because grace implies that God demands nothing in return."



There is some truth in this. Grace, God's favor or good will toward us, is undeserved. It includes unmerited pardon or forgiveness of sins. That cannot be earned.



But God's forgiving grace was never intended as a license to continue sinning. Paul makes this truth very plain:"What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? Certainly not! How shall we who died to sin live any longer in it?" (Romans 6:1-2).



Grace and law are inseparable, as the Bible clearly teaches. Since sin—the breaking of God's law (1 John 3:4)—is to be removed, what would be the point of pardoning people from it just to allow them to continue to violate God's law? This clearly makes no sense.



This also would be an utter contradiction of Paul's teaching that Jesus Christ"gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us from every lawless deed and purify for Himself His own special people, zealous for good works" (Titus 2:14).



Grace, made possible through Christ's sacrifice of Himself, allows us to be"redeemed"—to be bought back by God through Christ paying the price for our sins. But God's grace (His free gift ) encompasses much more. It includes our being purified as God's"own special people" through the gift of His Holy Spirit, making us"zealous for good works."



Yes, grace, through Christ's sacrifice, supplies the forgiveness that the law can't give. But grace does not replace the laws of God, as Scripture clearly shows. Rather, grace gives us a new beginning, a chance to start life over in harmony with God's teachings—which include the great spiritual principles embodied in His law. Indeed, grace includes God giving us the needed spiritual help to obey.



Who can receive salvation?

Many misunderstand grace. To think that God requires nothing from us except to believe that Jesus is the Son of God and that He died for our sins would deprive us of salvation—would leave us still in our sins!



Don't take my word for it! See what your Bible has to say:"Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord. Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in its lusts. And do not present your members as instruments of unrighteousness to sin, but present yourselves to God as being alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God.



"For sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under law [that is, under its punitive judgment for violating it, as they had been before they repented] but under grace. What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not! Do you not know that to whom you present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that one's slaves whom you obey, whether of sin leading to death, or of obedience leading to righteousness?" (Romans 6:11-16).



Remarkably, many sincere people still believe that no changes are required of them to receive God's gift of grace other than to believe on the name of Jesus and accept His shed blood for their sins. Paul's words above show that is simply not true.



Perhaps the most popular and misunderstood scripture that focuses on the importance of Jesus' death is found in John 3:16:"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."



The last part of this verse,"that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life," has been only partially understood by millions of people. Many mistakenly assume that believing in Jesus means only believing in His identity and promises and that it does not include any reciprocal action on their part. Yet truly believing in Jesus is demonstrated by one's actions. (See"What Does It Mean to Believe in Jesus?".)



But the Bible tells us emphatically that to be saved we must repent of our selfish ways, turn to God in faith and believe what Christ tells us to do (Acts 2:38). Many professing Christians who believe on Jesus still don't demonstrate their belief by living as Jesus instructs. As the Bible reveals, this initial, minimal level of belief isn't what Jesus desires (Luke 6:46).



When a rich young man asked Jesus what it would take for him to enter eternal life, he got an answer that would surprise many today:"If you want to enter into life, keep the commandments" (Matthew 19:17).



Jesus also warned that"whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven" (Matthew 5:19).



Paul knew this truth, explaining that "the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good" (Romans 7:12). Therefore, God wants us to keep His laws in the spirit as well as in the letter—to genuinely grasp and apply their full intent. Salvation is only offered to those who are willing to strive to keep God's commandments from the heart.



If you need further proof as to whether there's anything more we must do than what is traditionally taught, go to the very end of your Bible. There it states,"Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life [for the gift of eternal life], and may enter through the gates into the city [the new Jerusalem, our ultimate destiny]" (Revelation 22:14).



The Bible shows that there is much more for you and me to do than simply accept the name of Jesus, call ourselves Christians and accept the shed blood of our Savior. God wants to transform our lives, to build in us His righteous character.



To be accepted by God, to receive that great blessing, which is a gift and can't be earned, you and I must want to keep God's laws because we respect and love them and have repented of breaking them. Then we must accept God's grace for forgiveness of our past failure to keep His laws properly. And we must strive with His help to start obeying His laws, always repenting and asking for forgiveness when we fall short.



When Jesus' death applies to you

The death of Jesus Christ applies to you and me personally when we are drawn by God to understand His truths and we respond. If you've been called by God (see John 6:44), then you already recognize how Jesus' death applies to you.



Accepting the death of Jesus must be accompanied by repentance—a change of direction from our old habitual sins. It also requires that we exercise faith (sincere belief) in what Christ has taught us. This means we will begin obeying God's laws that can liberate us from our captivity to sin (Romans 6:11-23).



Yes, John 3:16 is true—we must believe in Jesus. But we need to fully understand what that means. The truth is that there is something for us to do, once we are drawn to God to understand His truth. We must know that our sins—yours, mine and everyone else's—have necessitated the death of Jesus Christ, without which we would die permanently and be forever forgotten.



Jesus died in our place. We deserve death; Jesus didn't. Anyone who sins deserves death (Romans 6:23). But God is merciful to us and has given us His Son to willingly take that penalty on Himself and die in our stead.



In response, He expects us to listen to His instruction, to obey His commands. This is what Jesus died for.



There's more to the greatest story ever told! So be sure to read the following article,"Jesus Christ's Resurrection: Leading the Way for Others," to discover the rest of the story of His involvement in your salvation. GN









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Related Resources

Jesus Christ: The Real Story

This booklet seeks to address and answer the major questions that people naturally ask in trying to understand Jesus Christ—the real story.



Whatever Happened to Sin?

It used to be common to hear messages condemning sin and warning of its consequences. Now most religious messages pass over the uncomfortable reality of sin to focus on "feel-good" themes. What is happening to Christianity—and is it missing a crucial part of Christ's message?



How To Overcome Sin

You need to understand this vital biblical formula for overcoming sin.



Why Do We Sin?

All of us have to deal with sin and its tragic consequences in our lives. Understanding why we sin is a first step in overcoming and avoiding sin.



Grace, Works and Obedience

Through God's grace, the gift of eternal life is given to those who demonstrate their faith in God by their obedience and repentance



The Road to Eternal Life

What is the purpose of human life? Are we here for a reason? Does the Bible provide answers for these questions? What does the Bible mean when it talks about repentence and conversion?



Transforming Your Life: The Process of Conversion

We will examine the Bible's teaching on conversion. Contrary to what many think, it is not just a one-time event. Instead the Scriptures reveal that it is a process.The process begins with God's calling, followed by the key steps of repentance, baptism and the receiving of the Holy Spirit—finally climaxing with the return of Jesus Christ, when the dead in Christ are resurrected to immortality and given eternal life. That is the ultimate transformation, being changed from a mortal to an immortal being!

Wknd Box Office: Conspirator, Meet Monica Velour, Scream 4, Music Never Stopped, Super

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/  reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post some of the movies from last week and  THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed!  This all  follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!






Wknd Box Office: Conspirator, Meet Monica Velour, Scream 4, Music Never Stopped, Super

By Debbie Schlussel



The only worthwhile movie, this weekend–and not by much–is the Civil War movie. The rest is populated by so much garbage and liberal crap, it’s sad. I did not see “Rio.”


* “The Conspirator“: The most interesting thing about Mary Surratt is not in this movie: that the Washington, DC boarding house she ran–where John Wilkes Booth and others originally hatched the plot against Lincoln–is now a Chinese restaurant. Surratt (played by Robin Wright, Sean Penn’s ex-wife) was charged with conspiracy to murder Lincoln because Booth other Confederate conspirators, and Surratt’s son originally hatched a plan to kidnap President Abraham Lincoln, as well as other members of his administration. Ultimately, it turned into a murder plot, as we know, with Boothe assassinating Lincoln.



The movie, directed by Robert Redford–or as I like to call him, Robert the Red–is sure to conjure up predictable, stale, whining liberal criticisms of America’s treatment of Gitmo detainees. The movie focuses on whether Surratt was entitled to a civilian trial with a jury of her peers. She was denied one and tried, instead, by a military tribunal. Redford says he didn’t mean to conjure up Gitmo, but he’s clearly lying. The movie is very sympathetic to Surratt and presents her as an innocent wrongly accused and taking the fall for her son. But many historians believe the evidence proved otherwise–that she knew exactly what was going on and aided and abetted it.


Also obvious in this movie is your typical liberal sympathies for single mothers. The movie portrays Surratt as a single mother done wrong. Her conspirator son fled the country, leaving her to take the fall for him and Lincoln’s murder, and she relies on her daughter, played by Evan Rachel Wood, to help in her defense.



The story here is about a Union soldier who becomes Surratt’s lawyer, despite not wanting to and seeing it as a betrayal of the Union. But as he tries his best to uncover the truth and fight for her rights, he changes his mind regarding her guilt and the fairness of her trial. The man went on to edit the Washington Post, so clearly, his quest for truth and justice ended with the conclusion of the Surratt trial.



Years ago, I saw a TV movie about Surratt, and I liked that a little better, as it appeared to be more historically accurate. Still, most people know little about Lincoln’s assassination beyond the basic fact that Booth killed him at the theater. The details of the plot should interest any history buff, especially Civil War enthusiasts, and most of those details are in less dispute. I found the movie a little slow and dull, but it was still interesting and enjoyable. Just don’t take it for an accurate portrayal of history. It’s clearly a politically charged and agenda-laden telling of the events, and if you watch it with that in mind, it’s worth seeing.



ONE-AND-A-HALF REAGANS




* “Meet Monica Velour“: Porky’s with expired anti-aging cream. Absolutely awful. This piece of garbage made me cringe. Painful to watch, and if I didn’t have to review it, I’d have walked out early on. It’s that bad. As you’ll recall, earlier in the week, I criticized JARC, a Jewish organization for the mentally disabled, for showing this flick as a fundraising event. I thought the movie would be sleazy and stupid. But those are the understatements of the year. Absolute crapola.



Kim Cattrall plays Monica Velour, an aging porn star who is reduced to stripping at sleazy local strip clubs for money, so she can pay a lawyer to get her young daughter back from her ex-husband. A young geek, just graduating from high school is her biggest fan. He has all of her X-rated movies and her posters and pin-ups, and his dream is to meet Monica. At 17, he drives across the country to see her strip at a strip club where he gets beaten up by other patrons. The geek fawns all over Monica, who has lost her looks and is a total loser and a miserable failure living in an Indiana hicktown, and seeks to help her . . . and to lose his virginity to her.



The movie is just sickening, completely dumb, and a long, boring waste of time. I couldn’t wait to get out of the theater. People watching porn tapes with silly double entendres, photos of giant vibrators and scenes of topless strippers with breast implants that are way too big–that’s not masterful movie making. It’s movies by people who never grew up and who never had class. Nothing redeeming here, including the two hours I wasted I’ll never redeem.



Oh, and here’s a tip for JARC, the organization for the mentally disabled: you might wanna think twice about showing a movie that uses “you half-assed retard” as an insult, at your fundraisers. Did you really not see the hypocrisy?



This is exactly the kind of trashy movie the Bin Ladens of the world use to incite hatred against the West. And in this case, they have something of a point (despite their hypocrisy on these issues).



FOUR MARXES PLUS A BIN LADEN




“Scream 4“: Been there, seen that . . . three times before. And it’s gotten old, way too old. Mostly this movie was stupid and not scary. But that wasn’t the point. The point is to go overboard in trying to parody itself and other horror movies. Oh, and also to introduce us to Scream . . . the Next Generation, so that some people in Hollywood can continue to make these dumb movies and clean up in the bank account. And, you know what? The next generation ain’t that appealing. Someone ought to tell Hollywood that Rory Culkin, McCauley’s younger brother, looks like a transvestite geek with that long hairstyle. Having him and the other “new Scream generation” repeatedly utter four letter words doesn’t make the movie any more entertaining.



The beginning of the movie was cool and funny . . . for like the first ten minutes. Everything was downhill from there. Schlocky, silly, and a waste of time. But it’s “Scream,” so you know what you’re gonna get: rehashed, non-stop bloody stabbings by someone in a ghost face mask and robe. Big whoop. Come up with something new, Hollywood.



Looks, though, like at least they might finally retire Courtney Cox and her estranged husband, David Arquette. Or maybe not. Either way, this was dullsville. Not thrilling. Not even close. Also, I could’ve done without all the substandard local Detroit news reporters and anchors whoring themselves out in this movie for their Michigan Film Tax Credit-subsidized cameos. Begone, shameless media whores.



ONE MARX




* “The Music Never Stopped“: I had mixed feelings about this movie. On the one hand, it’s liberal propaganda vilifying every American who stands up against burning the American flag and every American who opposed the slimy hippie anti-Vietnam war protesters. On the other hand, it does tell the touching story of a father who truly cared about his son and reconnected with him after a long absence. Still, I mostly hated it. And it is definitely the most depressing film I’ve seen in ages, especially if you experienced the death of a parent with whom you were close, as I did recently.



This is the story of parents who lost their son in the late ’60s or early ’70s because the father, a military veteran, was upset that his spoiled son was burning the flag and in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War. The son left, and when they reconnect, it is a couple of decades later, and their son has been found in a hospital recovering from a brain tumor that has affected his ability to have any short-term or even long-term memories. The only memories he has are when he listens to specific songs from his past and remembers what happened in his life at the time.



As I said, it’s depressing, and many of the memories are things like strife-filled arguments after flag-burning. Sorry, Hollywood, but those who opposed the flag-burnings, those who supported the troops instead of spitting on them and losing the war for them here on the streets in protests and marches–those who opposed these things and were, instead, proud Americans, those were the good people, the good parents, despite the way this movie vilifies them. Supporting your country and opposing brazen destruction of the flag does not cause brain tumors, and it doesn’t cause complete, pathetic memory loss.



Like I said, I was touched by the relationship the father develops with his son and how they reconnect. But it wasn’t enough to redeem the very strong statements it makes against American patriots and their quality as parents.



ONE MARX


* “Super“: Will Hollywood ever stop making gratuitously sleazy, anti-Christian movies like this? Sadly, no. But, like all of those with that description, this movie, too, is utter crap. Painful. I struggled to stay awake and to not walk out on this in the middle. It was boring, stupid, violent, bloody, and mocks Christians.



Rainn Wilson plays a loser husband, whose addict wife, Liv Tyler, leaves him for her drug dealer, a mobster boss thug played by Kevin Bacon. Wilson vows to get her back by donning a superhero outfit and fighting crime on the streets. But many of the people he violently beats and /or shoots to death are not criminals, or they’re just people who rubbed him the wrong way. His partner in crime–who also dons a superhero outfit–is the ever-dull, always annoying Ellen Page, who has sex with him while he’s wearing his superhero mask.



Oh, and the anti-Christian part: we are constantly shown scenes from some Christian cable TV channel, featuring a show with a dopey, preachy, moronic Christian superhero (Nathan Fillion), who tells people to be good and believe in the Bible. I know that’s not dopey or moronic, but the movie’s attitude is that it is and is to be mocked.



FOUR MARXES PLUS AN OBAMA PLUS A BIN LADEN









Friday, April 15, 2011

The Resurrection Connection

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Easter celebrations. This follows this previous post  about it. For a free magazine subscription or to get this book for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886-8632.

The Resurrection Connection


How did worship of an ancient god and goddess come to be associated with the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ? Although the details are lost in time, a closer look at the ancient mythology surrounding their worship will help us understand how pagan practices have survived in popular Easter customs.

Two of the earliest recorded deities were the Babylonian fertility god Tammuz and the goddess Ishtar. Every year Tammuz "was believed to die, passing away from the cheerful earth to the gloomy subterranean world" (Sir James Frazer, The Golden Bough, 1993, p. 326).



The seasonal cycle came to be connected with Tammuz's supposed annual death and resurrection. "Under the names of Osiris, Tammuz, Adonis, and Attis, the peoples of Egypt and Western Asia represented the yearly decay and revival of life ... which they personified as a god who annually died and rose again from the dead. In name and detail the rites varied from place to place: in substance they were the same" (p. 325).



Many of these rites revolved around inducing the return of Tammuz from the dead. One of these ceremonies is recorded in Ezekiel 8:14, where Ezekiel saw in vision an abominable sight: women "weeping for Tammuz" at the very temple of God.



The Expositor's Bible Commentary says regarding this verse: "Tammuz, later linked to Adonis and Aphrodite by name, was a god of fertility and rain ... In the seasonal mythological cycle, he died early in the fall when vegetation withered. His revival, by the wailing of Ishtar, was marked by the buds of spring and the fertility of the land. Such renewal was encouraged and celebrated by licentious fertility festivals ... The women would have been lamenting Tammuz's death. They perhaps were also following the ritual of Ishtar, wailing for the revival of Tammuz" (Ralph Alexander, Vol. 6, 1986, pp. 783-784).



As worship of Tammuz and Ishtar spread to the Mediterranean region, including the territory of biblical Israel, the pair came to be worshiped under other names: Baal and Astarte (Ashtoreth), Attis and Cybele, and Adonis and Aphrodite. God heatedly condemned the sensual, perverted worship of Baal and Astarte, the "Queen of Heaven" (Judges 2:11-15; 3:7-8; 10:6-7; 1 Kings 11:4-6, 31, 33; 16:30-33; 22:51-53; 2 Kings 23:13; Jeremiah 7:18).



Pre-Christian customs linked to Christ

In ancient worship we find the mythology that would ultimately link these ancient customs to Christ's death and resurrection. Says Alan Watts: "It would be tedious to describe in detail all that has been handed down to us about the various rites of Tammuz, Adonis,... and many others... But their universal theme—the drama of death and resurrection—makes them the forerunners of the Christian Easter, and thus the first ‘Easter services.' As we go on to describe the Christian observance of Easter we shall see how many of its customs and ceremonies resemble these former rites" (Easter: Its Story and Meaning, 1950, p. 58).



Watts describes some of the similarities and parallels: "Shortly before the vernal [spring] equinox ... the members of this cult [of Tammuz-Ishtar, Attis-Cybele and Adonis-Aphrodite] began a fast—as Christians also have the fast of Lent, beginning forty days before Easter."



He tells how some worshippers would cut down a tree, then carry it "with reverence and ceremony to Cybele's temple and set it up in the central sanctuary" There, "upon its central stem [trunk], was hung the figure of the young god" (p. 59).



"Here, for the remaining days of the fast, the worshipers gathered to sing hymns of mourning for the dead Attis ... And to this day, on Good Friday at the Veneration of the Cross, Christians sing their hymn of mourning for another and greater one who died on a Tree ..." (p. 59).



As the fast drew to an end, a remarkable rite took place: "The figure of the dead Attis was taken down from the tree and buried under the twilight sky. Far into the night his devotees stood around the grave and sang hymns of mourning. But as dawn approached, a great light was kindled, as today Christians light the Paschal Candle on Easter Eve as a symbol of the risen Christ" (pp. 61-62).



Frazer describes the idolatrous worship this way: "The sorrow of the worshippers was turned to joy ... The tomb was opened: the god had risen from the dead; and as the priest touched the lips of the weeping mourners with balm, he softly whispered in their ears the glad tidings of salvation. The resurrection of the god was hailed by his disciples as a promise that they too would issue triumphant from the corruption of the grave. On the morrow ... the divine resurrection was celebrated with a wild outburst of glee. At Rome, and probably elsewhere, the celebration took the form of a carnival" (p. 350).



An ancient celebration adopted

In its various forms, worship of Tammuz-Adonis-Attis spread around the Roman Empire including to Rome itself. As Christianity spread through the empire, religious leaders apparently merged customs and practices associated with this earlier "resurrected" god and applied them to the resurrected Son of God.



Says Frazer: "When we reflect how often the Church has skilfully contrived to plant the seeds of the new faith on the old stock of paganism, we may surmise that the Easter celebration of the dead and risen Christ was grafted upon a similar celebration of the dead and risen Adonis" (p. 345).



In this respect Easter followed the pattern of Christmas in being officially sanctioned and welcomed into the church. As Frazer goes on to say: "Motives of the same sort may have led the ecclesiastical authorities to assimilate the Easter festival of the death and resurrection of their Lord to the festival of the death and resurrection of another Asiatic god which fell at the same season. Now the Easter rites still observed in Greece, Sicily and southern Italy bear in some respects a striking resemblance to the rites of Adonis, and I have suggested that the Church may have consciously adapted the new festival to its heathen predecessor for the sake of winning souls to Christ" (p. 359).



To discover what God thinks of merging customs associated with worship of other gods with worship of Him, be sure to read "Does It Matter to God?".

While America Sleeps - Book Review

A very interesting book which describes the dangers from an unchecked reponse to immigration from what the author calls Reconquistadores and Jihadists along with the dumbing down of America's culture so that there will be no response to all of this.

You can get this from your library's Interlibrary loan department here http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/191079443&referer=brief_results
and Amazon here http://www.amazon.com/While-America-Sleeps-Immigration-Indoctrination/dp/0595435246/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1239394673&sr=1-1
 
While America Sleeps


The authors table of contents says it all, and I have never seen a better more organized laydown of content than this one, so good that I am spelling it out here because for many, the table of contents alone is sufficient (but I urge buying the book, it is very readable and thought-provoking).


An Economy in Hock
La Reconquista (the Reconquering, Mexico has gotten all the way back to the Guadalupe-Hidalgo line)
Absolishing Self-Defense
Subordinating Ourselves
Subordinating Our Culture
Subordinating Our Country
An Ideology of Submission
Enforcing the Ideology
Disabling Americans
Spreading the Ideology
Can America Be Saved?
Reclaiming the Individual
Reclaiming the Economy
Reclaiming the Government
If All Else Fails



This is an enormously important book that speaks to the heart and mind of every person of any race or faith who believes in America the Beautiful, in dignity, justice, and liberty for all. That's not what we stand for today, and that is a travesty of epic proportions.



Amazon's Helpful Customer Review


bookloversfriend  (United States) - See all my reviews(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)



The emphasis in this book is on HOW:
How militant Islamists get into the U. S., how they spread to cities and towns throughout the U.S., how they persuade us they are moderates, how they operate inside the U. S., how they manipulate our laws to protect their activities, how they exploit "political correctness" to escape detection.
Also, how the illegal immigration industry operates, how illegals are bussed to cities and towns throughout the U. S., how they are financed, how they have teams of free lawyers standing by to manipulate the laws of the U. S. to avoid deportation.
The INDOCTRINATION chapters include a detailed analysis of "political correctness" (which this book calls "Dhimmism" but might more properly be called "postliberalism"). We all use the term "political correctness" and think we know what it means, but most people have only a vague idea what it is, and we need to know. This book tells you in detail what it is and what it is not, how and why it developed, how it is enforced, and how it is spread.
The book tells you how colleges, schools, news media, law schools, courts and Hollywood came to be dominated by "political correctness", how more and more people are being indoctrinated into this new ideology, and how the minds of people so indoctrinated actually work, including why it is impossible to reason with them.
Your own children and grandchildren are being indoctrinated every day, not only in school, but from TV, pop/rock/rap music, and other sources.
Most urgently, the book tells you how "political correctness" protects the militant Islamists and illegal immigrants and guarantees that nothing will be done to stop them.
If you think somebody or other is taking care of these problems or will take care of them, then you need to read this book to find out you're living in a dream. If you think the government is so strong that you don't need to worry, then you're part of the sleeping America. People are already being hurt in many ways, but the worst is yet to come. The situation is not hopeless--not yet, but it will be in the near future if most people continue to be misinformed. Give a copy to everyone you love.