Showing posts with label Trey Gowdey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trey Gowdey. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Can Apple Make You Happy?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Apple Computer. This follows this post about Labor Day. This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

MP4 Video - 720p (79.85 MB)
MP3 Audio (1.23 MB)
Video of BT Daily: Can Apple Make You Happy?

Can happiness be found in an electronic gadget?

Transcript


[Darris McNeely] So I’ve got my latest iPhone here. No, wait a minute. It’s not the latest iPhone. Just a few months after I bought this iPhone, the next one came out, and then another one. You know, the gadget game is one that when you get into, there’s always going to be something newer even after you’ve spent hundreds of dollars on what is, you think at that moment the latest. I was reading an article about Apple computer, and recently people have been complaining that Apple hasn’t come out with anything in recent years, or recent months that’s new and a whole game changer when it comes to electronics. And the article is saying it’s as if people want Apple to unveil a happiness device, and otherwise they won’t be happy until it does, which raised the question do things make us happy?
[Steve Myers] There’s always the latest, the greatest, the next thing. Same thing with computers, whatever it may be. Buy one and it seems the day you walk out of the store it’s already obsolete. The next one is coming. And so if that’s what makes us happy, then there’s always something else just beyond our reach that we can never quite get to.
[Darris McNeely] I’ll be the first to admit, I’m a gadget freak and I do like new gadgets. And I am sold on Apple and I usually buy, try to buy the latest that I can or keep up fairly current with their products. But it’s also caused me over the years to step back and realize, hey, these things don’t really make me completely happy. I enjoy them and they make life very convenient in many ways, but happiness deep down, that’s another issue.
[Steve Myers] Absolutely, and Jesus Christ Himself taught that very things. Now He didn’t mention iPhones, but over in Luke 12:23 He said, “Life is more than food, and the body more than clothing.” And you could substitute iPhones or computers or gadgets or videogames or whatever it might be. Those things do not make life happier. We can get some enjoyment out of them, that sort of thing. But if we’re counting on them to make us happy, Christ says we’ve got our priorities out of line.
[Darris McNeely] A good way to look at what Christ said in this statement is to ask yourself the question, how many things do you need to be happy? That’s probably the most important question to answer, and then you will know what and where true happiness comes from.
[Steve Myers] Absolutely. In fact He concludes, “Seek the Kingdom of God.” Seek the Kingdom of God because that’s really where the true happiness lies - in a spiritual relationship with God.
[Darris McNeely] That’s BT Daily . Join us next time.

Monday, July 18, 2016

Editorial: Police Shootings Continue, Obama Blames White Racism

Editorial

Not only are Police being denied Due Process and Freedom of Speech, but as we heard in the Dallas "commemoration" the unproven institutional racism of whites is blamed, even though the VICTIMS, not the shooter, were white, and Hispanic.
In Louisiana, the shooter was also not white, but two of the victims were and one was Black.

Unfortunately, there is also white guilt, also known as white ehthnomasochism, in play here.


Friday, July 8, 2016

IMPEACH Obama, Clintons, and their cronies!

A timely post from http://www.vdare.com, http://www.debbieschlussel.com, and http://www.dickmorris.com about IMPEACHMENTS! This follows this post about the Supreme Court and the EPA. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump.
You can
follow me here.

Send these articles to your Representative HERE: http://ziplook.house.gov/htbin/findrep?ZIP=0


Hillary and FBI Director James ComeyHillary and FBI Director James Comey

Hillary Clinton Too Big To Jail—But Not Too Big To Impeach


Anyone who knows anyone in America’s intelligence community knows that they are absolutely incensed by Hillary’s email scandal—here’s a typical comment:
Regarding ‪#‎Clinton email issue just announced by the FBI director, here’s the deal. As an Army guy who works in Intel I could not even imagine sending something classified or on a sensitive topic over private email. And if I received an email like this I would immediately stop it and bring to the attention of the sender. This is NOT a political matter in my eyes, it is a national security matter and anyone who has handled classified or sensitive content/emails 100% knows (or should know) protocol on this.
Here’s Glenn Reynolds (link in original, emphases added):
FBI Director James Comey announced that the FBI will not recommend charges against Hillary. Although he said that there was extreme “carelessness” in handling classified information, the lack of intent to violate the law precluded prosecution. That’s a bit of a surprise given that the Department of Justice is currently prosecuting Petty Officer First Class Kristian Saucier for a similar crime where no intent was involved. This gives rise to suspicions, verging on certainty, that the law is different when your name is Clinton, that laws are for the “little people” and not those in charge.
The obvious answer to this flagrantly unequal, Third World-style “justice”: the Congressional GOP should simply announce that, if Clinton is elected President, they will impeach her.
VDARE.com has repeatedly argued that the seismic stress on American institutions caused by nation-breaking immigration will ultimately have to be relieved by impeachment—of legislating judges, of public officials, of Presidents. The Stupid Party, of course, has reacted stupidly, not noticing that Democrats regularly discuss impeachment when they think they might benefit (another reason Donald Trump should select an immigration-patriot VP).
It’s a vulgar error to think that impeachment is only appropriate in the case of a crime, as I explained here. But Hillary Clinton quite clearly has committed a crime.
What is the GOP waiting for—ah, fuhgeddaboutit.

James Comey Freed These Islamic Terrorists, Got Them Citizenship, Prosecuted Feds Who Pursued Them

By Debbie Schlussel
Hillary’s James Comey . . .
jamescomeylaughinghillarylaughing

colclink.jpgseenoevil
. . . Freed These Islamic Terrorists, Gave Them Citizenship & Prosecuted the Feds Who Investigated, Tried & Convicted Them

detroitterrorcell
FBI Director James Comey has a history of looking the other way–and even working to free–hardened criminals, including Islamic terrorists. And he also has a history of going after Feds who got guilty verdicts against those Islamic terrorists . . . going after them for far less than what Hillary Clinton did. Comey does justice to the FBI nickname, Famous But Incompetent.







Longtime readers of this site should be familiar with James Comey, and they shouldn’t be surprised that, despite overwhelming evidence that Hillary Clinton committed several federal crimes, Comey worked overtime to look the other way and give her a pass. As I’ve told many readers and friends who’ve asked, Hillary Clinton was never going to be indicted. But having James Comey lead the “investigation” of her, sealed her free-as-a-bird card.
It was obvious to me that it was decided long ago that Comey would see no evil no matter what when it came to the Clintons. It was obvious that the three-hours-plus interview of Hillary Clinton was a mere formality–a show interview–and a waste of time, given that, less than two days later, Comey had already scheduled his press conference announcing his decision. I’ve never ever heard of the FBI interviewing a suspect in a major investigation like that and already coming to a conclusion a mere couple of days later over a prolonged holiday weekend. Just doesn’t happen . . . unless the fix is in. As it was here.
Many overrated prognosticators, commentators, talk show hosts, and analysts, including Rush Limbaugh, have wrongly claimed that Comey is a “straight shooter.” But they just didn’t know what they were talking about and couldn’t be more wrong in that assessment. I’ve warned you about James Comey for years.
As I’ve told you previously on this site, Comey led the team to free four Islamic terrorists. The men, Farouk Ali-Haimoud, Ahmed Hannan, Karim Koubriti, and Abdel Ilah Elmardoudi, were known as the “Detroit Terror Cell,” and were discovered by FBI agents in a house on Norman Street in Detroit after the 9/11 attacks. The men, most of them visa overstays or here illegally, were found when the FBI visited the last known Detroit residence of Nabil Al-Marabh, who was known as Osama Bin Laden’s assistant and was then on the top ten of the FBI’s Most Wanted List.
The four men had various plots in the planning stages, including poisoning water in Michigan and Ohio, blowing up cites in Disneyland and Vegas hotels (they had video surveillance of both), blowing up the U.S. Air Force base in Incirlik, Turkey from which American and Israeli military planes took off, and bombing the Queen Alia Hospital in Jordan. The terrorists’ video surveillance of Disneyland featured them singing about jihad and destroying America in the background. When agents raided their home, they found diagrams of the Incirlik base, including diagrams of U.S. AIWACS planes and Israeli F-16s and details of the order in which the American and Israeli planes took off. They also found a cheat sheet for the Commercial Driver’s License exam. The men trained for CDLs and HazMat hauling certificates through tax-funded job training at the Muslim-dominated ACCESS (the Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services), to the tune of several thousand dollars.
Because of James Comey, all four of these men are now U.S. citizens. One of them, Karim Koubriti, is not only now a citizen, but he has that Commercial Driver’s License he was seeking, and he’s driving trucks all over America . . . thanks to James Comey.
As I told you years ago on this site, my friends, former Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Convertino and FBI counterterrorism agent Mike Thomas, were on the case. The Feds gave them no support. It was the first jury trial of terrorists after 9/11. And the four terrorists were convicted by a federal jury.
But for politically-correct reasons, the Feds didn’t like the fact that Muslims were convicted of terrorism. And this was under George W. Bush and John Ashcroft, NOT Barack Obama and Loretta Cankles Lynch. So, they worked behind Convertino’s and Thomas’ back and sought the tiniest shred of evidence, the most weak grounds to overturn the conviction.
YES, you read that right: THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WORKED TO OVERTURN A JURY CONVICTION OF ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND SET THEM FREE. And that’s exactly what happened.
And JAMES COMEY led the “team.” At the time, Comey was the top deputy to U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft. And because of James Comey, Islamic terrorists Farouk Ali-Haimoud, Ahmed Hannan, Karim Koubriti, and Abdel Ilah Elmardoudi are living free in our midst and are American citizens.
James Comey looked the other way for these four terrorists the same way he looked the other way for Hillary Clinton. He worked overtime to free these four convicted terrorists, the same way he worked overtime to keep Hillary Clinton free.
But that wasn’t all he did. James Comey also headed the (In)Justice Department team that went after both prosecutor Convertino and FBI agent Thomas on the flimsiest of grounds. Comey led the team that indicted Convertino and Thomas. Yes, you read that right: James Comey prosecuted a prosecutor and an FBI agent for the “crimes” of investigating, prosecuting and convicting Islamic terrorists who were planning various terrorist attacks against America.
Both Convertino and Thomas were acquitted. But they spent endless hours, dollars, and years of stress trying to prove their innocence. Two U.S. federal juries–the one that acquitted Convertino and Thomas and the one that convicted the Detroit Terror Cell members–said they were terrorists who wanted to attack us. But James Comey said otherwise.
Just like James Comey claimed Hillary didn’t commit a crime by intentionally and illegally using a private server to send classified information out.
That’s the James Comey I warned you about when he became FBI Director. That’s the same James Comey I saw lying through his teeth and looking the other way yesterday for criminal Hillary Clinton just as he did with the Detroit Terror Cell terrorists.
The fix is in for those who hate us, whether they are Islamic terrorists or spoiled brat millionairess liars running for Prez.
And James Comey has their back. Not yours.

A Corrupt Bargain: Hillary To Reappoint Lynch As Attorney General

By Dick Morris

On Sunday, July 3rd, The New York Times printed what can only be called a sales receipt sealing the deal whereby the Clintons bought the cooperation of Attorney General Loretta Lynch return for a promise to reappoint her. The Times story featured the following quote:
“Democrats close to Mrs. Clinton say she may decide to retain Ms. Lynch, the nation’s first black woman to be attorney general, who took office in April 2015.”
The damning quote was inserted into the Times story to confirm to Lynch that her message had been received and acknowledged by Hillary’s people. The deal was set: No indictment in return for reappointment.
In light of the timing of events over the past few days, anyone with an ounce of sense must dismiss the idea that the sequence of meetings and statements was merely coincidental. It was all planned.
Did Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch happen to be on the same tarmac at the same time on Thursday, June 30th? No way. A Congressional committee should put both under oath and ask the question. (Although swearing Bill in to tell the truth under oath is, perhaps, pointless). Doubtless, an intermediary such as former Attorney General Eric Holder was involved in arranging the meeting.
Was it coincidental that no media was allowed and photographs were prohibited? And that the story only leaked because someone in Justice let it out? Of course it was not.
And, during the meeting, what happened? A great deal more than a discussion of grandchildren. Likely Lynch told Bill that his wife wouldn’t be indicted and, perhaps, even coached her — through him — about what to say at her deposition two days hence.
And, in return, one can easily imagine a hearty handshake from the former president and a bromide like “I want you to know that both Hillary and I deeply admire the job you are doing as Attorney General and would be honored to have you continue to work closely with us in the future.” Translation: reappointment. A corrupt bargain.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Leave No Man Behind - Benghazi, anyone?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Benghazi, Libya. This follows this post about the Supreme Court. This follows this post about Great Britain. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632. 


MP3 Audio (7.73 MB)
The Marine Corps’ motto to leave no man behind on the battlefield packs a powerful lesson in brotherhood, loyalty and courage. For a Christian this thought was first laid down in the question: “Am I my brother’s keeper?” The answer is yes, we are. We do have an obligation toward each other. That obligation presents challenges that will test our character and can determine a lot about who we are.
Two recent movies treat this theme with two different outcomes. I recently had opportunity to watch both. I can highly recommend them.
We are our brother’s keeper. We cannot, under any circumstances, leave anyone behind.
The first was the movie  The Martian.  This is a science fiction story set in the year 2035. A manned mission to Mars is interrupted by a severe dust storm forcing the crew to an emergency evacuation on the planet. One astronaut is downed by flying debris, knocked unconscious and presumed to be dead when no life signs can be monitored, as telemetry for his life signs was knocked out. The remaining crew enter their ship and leave him behind and depart for earth. But he is not dead, only wounded and knocked unconscious. He recovers and returns to the base station and determines through several ingenious methods how he can stay alive until the next planned mission to Mars occurs—at least two years. Meanwhile his fellow astronauts are on their home ship returning to earth and unaware that he lives. NASA has made contact but decides not to tell the returning crew they left behind a live comrade. [If you haven’t seen the movie, skip the next paragraph as it contains some plot spoilers.]
The story turns into a rescue mission when the crew learns that their mate lives and they are faced with the decision of whether they will return to Mars and attempt to save the abandoned astronaut’s life. This moment is really the best in the movie. The group of four, safe and on their way home after a long stay in space, unanimously decide to return and make the effort to save their friend. They decide to “leave no man behind.” Here the movie speaks to perhaps the highest and noblest qualities of courage and loyalty. To turn from safety and risk one’s life for another comes the closest on our level to what Christ did when He came in the flesh to rescue man from sin and give the opportunity for eternal life.
The second movie I saw is more controversial. It, too, tells a real life story of courage. But since it deals with real events in the real world, the lines of truth are not as clearly defined. It is also a story still debated in the headlines as Congressional committees, journalists and victims of the dead still seek to understand what happened and who is responsible. It is the story of the September 2012 massacre of United Sates Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three CIA operatives in Benghazi, Libya. The tragedy has now been made into a movie just released a few days ago called 13 Hours.  The film’s director claims to have made careful effort to tell the truth of what happened when Islamic terrorists stormed the ambassador’s compound on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. The screenplay is based on a book written by surviving CIA soldiers who were members of the Global Response Staff (GRS) working at a secret CIA installation one mile from the Ambassador’s poorly secured compound.
This story was investigated and gone over in countless news reports and Congressional inquiries. Hillary Clinton, who was then Secretary of State and now a contender for the presidency, was called to answer questions about what she knew and did or did not do during the attack. The movie makes clear that officials at the highest level, including the president, were briefed and made aware of the unfolding events that fateful night in Libya. It also makes clear that additional backup support from the GRS soldiers a mile away was delayed in arriving to help the ambassador’s ill-prepared team. The CIA station chief would not give the order for backup. The additional soldiers had to defy orders to make a run to the compound to save two State Department staff. The ambassador and one staff member were killed in the attack. The CIA soldiers would not leave anyone behind. They went toward the danger, seeking to save their fellow Americans.
The courage of those real life soldiers who ran toward the fire in Benghazi and the science fiction tale of rescue in space are two standout stories. We live in a sterile world where risk is minimized, failure is insured and accountability and responsibility are not always taught in the public arena. We need to be reminded that when things go wrong, when danger rises and when our brother is in trouble, something has to be done. Someone has to step up.
We are our brother’s keeper. We cannot, under any circumstances, leave anyone behind.

You might also be interested in...

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Wknd Box Office: 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, Anomalisa, Ride Along 2

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post about some of the movies from last week and THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch yourself!

 

Wknd Box Office: 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, Anomalisa, Ride Along 2

By Debbie Schlussel
13hoursanomalisa

ridealong2
One really fantastic new movie debuting at theaters this weekend. The rest: skipworthy.
* “13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi” – Rated R: This is a great movie. Very well done. I liked it much better than “American Sniper” (read my review). It’s nearly 2.5 hours long, but you’d hardly know it, as it is full of heart-pounding action, suspense, and–yes–comedy. It is very entertaining, but an important education for every American, even if you know many of the details of the true story of what happened on September 11, 2012 at two U.S. installations in Benghazi, Libya–one a diplomatic outpost and the other a secret CIA base.
Although Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are never mentioned, it’s very clear that they are the failed “leaders” who bear responsibility for the Muslim murders of three security team members and Ambassador Chris Stevens. As indicated by the title, the movie details the 13 hours of horror faced by six security detail members and how they begged the CIA station chief to give them permission to respond to the attack on the Ambassador’s residence, permission he repeatedly refused to give. The movie shows in stark detail the arrogant, smug, hateful attitude exemplified by many a State Department diplomat toward our military men and contractors. They treat the military and security contractors like dirt and constantly tell them they are “not needed.”
The CIA station chief, Bob (played by David Costabile, who was meth-maker Gale Boetticher in “Breaking Bad’) is the worst among them. He’s the one who repeatedly orders the security team to “stand down” and allow the terrorist attacks to happen. He’s an elitist, who constantly tells the military men who saved his ass, that “we have people here from Harvard and Yale.” But Harvard (Barack Obama) and Yale (Hillary Clinton) didn’t save the day. They helped create a night of horrors.
There are many scenes of drone views of the impending and, then, occurring attacks on the two American outposts in Benghazi–one a temporary residence for the Ambassador and the other a secret, but not-so-secret, CIA base. And although Clinton and Obama are not mentioned, the dialogue makes it obvious that everyone at the White House, the State Department, and the Pentagon knew what was going on, but just simply ignored the pleas for help. The security team members note that those in the Oval Office, at State, and at the Pentagon are not only seeing what’s going on through the drone footage, but that “they’re seeing more of what’s going on than what we’re seeing.”
The dialogue also responds to the phony claims, frequently shrieked by Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice with Barack Obama’s full sanction and approval, that the attacks were caused by an “anti-Islamic” YouTube video. The security team discusses that and notes that “we didn’t hear anything about any video,” whether in chatter or in the chants and protests of the Muslims who attacked them. They also talk about how the attacks had to have been coordinated and planned for weeks and maybe months because they were so precise and because the “secret” installations and the airwaves of the security were so easily and quickly pinpointed by the Muslim attackers.
As the movie also makes clear, every single other foreign embassy and mission saw the danger and closed down, evacuating Libya ahead of this. Only the U.S. ignored the obvious warning signs, partly because of the naive pan-Islamism of Ambassador Chris Stevens. This movie captures very accurately the smarmy, pan-Arabist naivete of Stevens, who also said he didn’t need security because he stupidly thought the Muslims to whom he pandered would return the favor. Instead, they showed him the “big Islamic love” for Americans: torture and death (the movie doesn’t show what we know happened: that Stevens, a gay man, was tortured and sodomized by the Muslims before he was murdered).
As I’ve noted on this site, Stevens was a big supporter of the overthrow of Muammar Qaddafi, a big supporter of Islam and the FUBAR “Arab Spring,” and a friend of HAMAS and the Palestinians, who mourned him. (He was also a well-known Israel-hater–yup, Israel, the only place in the Middle East where he could be openly gay and live to see the end of the day.) There’s a reason that Stevens was mourned by the PLO and HAMAS. The guy romanticized Muslim extremists (a redundant phrase) for a living and was their willing tool. Although Stevens is portrayed somewhat as a “victim” here, he is more an accessory and had the blood of the three security men on his hands. He irresponsibly put everyone at risk in the name of his “Arabian Nights” fantasies. And the movie does show that he didn’t want much security, lest it offend his Muslim friends and killers–something I pointed out on this site, back in 2012.
They Were Murdered Because . . .
. . . These Dhimmi Idiot Didn’t Want to Offend Muslims w/ Adequate Security . . .
John Krasinsky is ostensibly star of this movie, but the real star is Pablo Schreiber, younger half-brother of Liev Schreiber, who plays real-life former Army Ranger Kris “Tanto” Paronto. He’s an up-and-comer who’s had bit parts until “Orange is the New Black.” But as this movie makes clear, he’s got the acting chops. He’s got great delivery and comedic timing.
And might I say, as a red-blooded American woman, all of the guys who played the security team in this movie, were hot, hot, hot–even with their bushy beards. Schreiber, James Badge Dale (“Rubicon”), David Denman, Dominic Fumusa (the ex-husband in “Nurse Jackie”), and Max Martini, were all smokin’, and for us chicks, there were a lot of nice, eye-candy scenes of these very cut, very masculine guys working out with their shirts off. See, as a woman, I can be just as much of a sexist and chauvinist as a guy, but I get away with it (and pop culture doesn’t lecture me about it and call me a future rapist the way they do with men). Those are my kinda guys–strong, courageous, proud, and not afraid to do what is right. And they really captured the spirit and persona of ex-Army Ranger, ex-Navy SEAL security contractors.
Muslims will not like this movie because it tells the truth and it shows these men wearing and waving Islamic crescents and shouting “allahu [FUBAR]” before and during their terrorist attacks. And while director Michael Bay does make a silly effort–in fact, he tries way toooo hard–to try to show us that “not all Muslims” are this way, we know this was a Muslim attack and that no Muslims tried to stop it. In fact, the “friendly” Muslim militias paid to protect the U.S. installations in Benghazi were anything but friendly. They were weak, useless, and, in many cases, probably working with their fellow co-religionists to murder Americans.
Although this is rated “R”–mostly because of language and somewhat violent and bloody (including a semi-dismembered hand) images–it’s fine for teens–they need to see what America is up against and will be up against more and more in the very near future. My only fault with the movie is a minor technical one: the postscripts at the end of the movie–telling us what happened to each of the characters–go by very fast. Way too fast to actually read them. I could have used a few seconds more.
Best line in the movie: “Payback’s a bitch, and her stripper name is Karma.” Problem is, not a single American official who allowed the Benghazi attacks to take place and left Americans to the Islamic wolves, has gotten even an iota of payback or karma. One of ’em is currently Prez and another will probably soon see her ugly cankles occupying the Oval Office.
This is riveting. Go see it.
FOUR REAGANS
reagancowboyreagancowboyreagancowboyreagancowboy
Watch the trailer . . .

* “Anomalisa” – Rated R: I hate movies that rely on gimmicks, and this is one of those gimmicky movies. With or without the gimmicks, it’s just a slow, boring, sludge through some average life and a complete waste of time. Even reality TV is more exciting than this. So, what is the gimmick? Well, there are two of them here: it’s animated, and the characters are all supposed to be marionettes. It’s stupid and pointless because, the marionette part has no bearing on the plot. These are supposed to be real humans, except that they have barely visible seams on their faces and on one occasion, part of a guy’s face falls off, and he puts it back on. So what? Again, what’s the point? The only “cute” part of the gimmickry is that most of the characters, including women, have the same voice–a man’s voice. But that quickly wears off, as it becomes extremely confusing. The most “memorable” scene in this movie (and I’d rather unsee, unsee, unsee! this) is a very creepy, very weird, extended, graphic, sex scene between the marionettes. Eeuuww.
The “story”: Michael Stone (David Thewlis, who has a British accent) is a customer service expert who has written a book and gives speeches at conventions. He travels to Cleveland to give a speech at a convention there. He has a mundane life, including a wife and a son–with neither of whom he seems much endeared. The movie starts out with an annoying, talkative cab driver gabbing endlessly to him about stupidity–urging him to go to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and a sex toy shop. Then, there is more annoying and boring crap. Stone settles into his hotel, interacts with hotel staff and guests, and meets two women who are big fans of his. One of them, Lisa (Jennifer Jason Leigh), has a scar on her face, and he goes for her. He takes Lisa to his room and convinces her to have sex with him. Then, we “get to see” this paunchy, aging customer service expert–animated as a marionette–naked and having sex with the scarred Lisa, whom he calls, “Anomalisa.” It’s gross and something I could have definitely lived without. Nothing romantic about it. Maybe there’s some merit to having this disgusting, unromantic kind of sex scene in movies–better to show teens this than the fakery in most Hollywood movies. Still, yuck!
The rest of the movie is equally a waste of time. Michael has a bad dream in which the hotel manager tries to trap him in the basement to stop Michael from romancing Lisa. Michael wakes up and tells Lisa he wants to leave his wife for her. Michael delivers his speech and gets flustered and stumped in the middle of it. Michael looks for a toy for his son and buys him a creepy Japanese sex toy figure. Michael returns home to an unwanted surprise birthday party thrown for him by his wife. Michael doesn’t love his wife or much care for his young toddler son. But he’s resigned to it. The end.
Um, why do I care about any of this? The movie didn’t tell me, and instead stole 90 minutes of my life I’ll never get back . . . and laughed at me.
If you want to see Mundane America, you can see that life every single day at the mall. You don’t need to waste ten bucks plus and 1.5 hours that seem like three.
High-quality artsy-fartsy Gitmo torture material.
TWO ISIS BEHEADINGS
isisbeheadingisisbeheading
Watch the trailer . . .

* “Ride Along 2” – Rated PG-13: As a rule, I generally try to see the first installment of a movie series before I see the sequel. But there is something so disgusting–so perverted!–about cop-hating thug Ice Cube playing a cop that I avoid seeing his crap as much as possible. I mean, this is the guy who for years–and to date–rapped, “F–k Tha Police.” And he raised a generation of Black (and White) Americans to think that way, to the point that it’s now open killing season on police across America. And then he has the utter chutzpah to make zillions on playing a cop?! Whatta guy. And he’s laughing all the way to the bank–yup, another slimy example of anti-capitalist capitalism. To call him a schmuck would be an insult to schmucks.
Oh, and on top of that, Ice Cube (slave name: O’Shea Jackson), is a Jew-hating member of the Nation of Islam, who proudly poses on the cover of one of his albums with a copy of Louis Farrakhan’s completely debunked “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews” (which falsely blames Jews for the Black slave trade in American history–um, that was Muslims). Excuse me if I don’t like bigoted Cop-and-Jew-haters and don’t wanna help contribute to their megazillions.
And the movie has zero merit. It’s stupid, silly, and boring. The lamest re-run of “Miami Vice” is far more exciting. This movie looks like it came out of ’80s movie schlock (with apologies to ’80s movie schlock for the comparison).
The story: screw-up police officer Kevin Hart longs to be somebody on the Atlanta police force. His future bro-in-law Ice Cube is a police detective. Hart is supposed to marry Ice Cube’s sister (who is a full foot taller than Hart) the following weekend. After botching an undercover drug buy, Cube and Hart discover some intel on a murderous Miami drug kingpin (Benjamin Bratt). Cube manages to get permission to take the bumbling Hart to Miami with him to investigate. They team up with a local Cuban police officer (the half-Chinese Olivia Munn, who looks as “Cuban” as Lisa Ling does) in their investigation. In a series of typical, stale plot “points,” the three of them are repeatedly foiled by the drug kingpin, who is a major donor to the police and has built up goodwill with the head honchos on the Miami police force (um, didn’t I see that in “Breaking Bad” with Gus Fring?). They also repeatedly screw up. Gee, I didn’t see that coming. But, ultimately and predictably, they get the bad guy.
Yaaaawn. In fact, this is so tiresome that I fell asleep three times and missed nothing. There are a few funny lines in this. But, mostly, it’s just unbearable. Yes, I get that Kevin Hart is only 5’4″ tall. But is that the only thing they can make fun of in this movie? It gets old . . . fast. Just like this movie. Tired, silly, pointless, and a total waste of time. Hey, that’s why they released it in January.
THREE MARXES
karlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpg
Watch the trailer . . .

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly
    
 

Friday, September 11, 2015

America and Britain: a public display of weakness in Syria

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Syria and western weakness. This follows this post about 9/11 miracles. This follows this post about the "King of the South." For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
Please follow me here for continued posts.



Current Events & Trends

America and Britain: a public display of weakness

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!
Sign In | Sign Up
×
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron advocated military intervention from the air, but he then suffering the acute embarrassment of a decisive rejection by the House of Commons.
U.S. President Barack Obama likewise stated a determination to intervene with air strikes. Yet his appeal to the U.S. Congress for support was cleverly interrupted by Russian President Vladimir Putin's surprising proposal to get Syria's Bashar al-Assad to destroy his chemical weapons.
On the surface Putin's counter-intervention got America, Britain and the West off the hook in Syria. But what about consequences—simple cause and effect?
The Economist 's lead editorial put forward an excellent analysis in late September, stating: “But this week, a decade after the invasion of Iraq, it suddenly became clear just how far the influence of the West has ebbed. The pity is how few Americans and Europeans seem to care about that”(“America, Russia and Syria: The Weakened West,” Sept. 21, 2013).
As Edward Luce expressed it in the Financial Times in another context: “Credibility matters. It may be hard to pin down, but you know when it is leaking” (“Washington's Rolling Seizures Short-Circuit US Soft Power,” Oct. 6). This remains a critical long-term trend that we cannot afford to ignore.
The Economist 'sinsightful analysis continues: “Yet the deal looks good only because the mess Mr Obama had got himself into was so bad. Step back, and the outcome looks rotten. For a start, the deal itself is flimsy because it will be so hard to enforce … It is hard to impose disarmament during a civil war. As time drags on, Mr Assad is likely to frustrate the process—both to keep some chemical weapons and to be seen to defy America. America's credibility as an ally has been undermined.”
Notice this newsweekly's overall assessment of the dark consequences: “Now every tyrant knows that a red line set by the leader of the free world is really just a threat to ask legislators how they feel about enforcing it. Dictators will be freer to maim and murder their own people, proliferators like North Korea less scared to proceed with spreading WMD, China and Russia ever more content to test their muscles in a vacuum left by the West.”
How do these trends fulfill Bible prophecy? They simply underscore the obvious moral decline already severely afflicting America and Britain—foretold in the pages of the Bible.
No other Bible study aid booklet that we publish expresses these tragic consequences better than The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy . Thankfully this Bible study aid also shows that everything will come right when Jesus Christ returns to rule the world, bringing us God's way of life. (Source: The Economist. )

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Could the Jig Finally Be Up for Huma Abedin?

A timely post about from www.jihadwatch.org about Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton's chief assistant. This follows this post about fake "hate crimes." This follows this post about Muslims refugee resettlement in the U.S., such as in Idaho. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
You can follow me here.


Robert Spencer, FrontPage: Could the Jig Finally Be Up for Huma Abedin?

Huma HillaryIn FrontPage this morning I explain why the current mini-controversy over Huma Abedin bespeaks a much larger problem with America’s contemporary political culture.
They got Al Capone for tax evasion, and they may get Huma Abedin for “violating rules regarding vacation and sick leave” and for the “possible exchange of unsecured, classified data.” To be sure, these are serious charges, and the available evidence makes it abundantly clear that there is ample warrant to investigate and perhaps even charge Abedin. However, it is a sign of a serious problem with today’s political culture that even more serious allegations regarding Abedin have never been investigated, and almost certainly never will be.
Huma Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood connections have been fully exposed by Andrew McCarthy and bruited about for years. The facts are quite public, albeit largely ignored: Abedin’s parents are both members of the Muslim Brotherhood, but her links to the organization are not just familial. Abedin was for twelve years the assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), which was founded by Abdullah Omar Naseef, a Muslim Brotherhood operative and al-Qaeda financier. Naseef and Abedin both appeared on the JMMA’s masthead from 1996 to 2003.
Consider that Abedin worked closely for seven years with a member of the Muslim Brotherhood who financed al-Qaeda in light of the Obama Administration’s foreign policy during the years that Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State. Everyone acknowledges that Abedin and Clinton are extremely close, and that Abedin controls access to Clinton and has tremendous influence over her. Hillary Clinton’s tenure at the State Department was distinguished by the remarkable sight of Egyptian anti-Muslim Brotherhood protestors holding signs denouncing the President of the United States for supporting terrorism, and by the Benghazi debacle, when the Secretary of State sat back and did nothing as jihad terrorists murdered four Americans, including an ambassador.
Then there was the Benghazi cover-up, during which Clinton vowed to have a man who made a video criticizing Muhammad arrested and imprisoned for supposedly provoking the riots, thereby placing herself firmly in opposition to the freedom of speech and aligning herself with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s efforts to compel Western governments to criminalize criticism of Islam (under the guise of “incitement to religious hatred”).
Is it at all possible that Huma Abedin, whose parents were active in the Brotherhood and who worked for twelve years for a journal closely linked to the Brotherhood, had anything to do with the pro-Muslim Brotherhood orientation of the Obama/Clinton State Department? In today’s poisonous political culture, it isn’t possible even to ask the question without incurring charges of “Islamophobia” – as we saw in 2012, when Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN) had the temerity to call for an investigation of possible Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. government.
Bachmann explained: “The concerns about the foreign influence of immediate family members is such a concern to the U.S. Government that it includes these factors as potentially disqualifying conditions for obtaining a security clearance, which undoubtedly Ms. Abedin has had to obtain to function in her position. For us to raise issues about a highly-based U.S. Government official with known immediate family connections to foreign extremist organizations is not a question of singling out Ms. Abedin. In fact, these questions are raised by the U.S. Government of anyone seeking a security clearance.” And that was to say nothing about Abedin’s association with Naseef and work with the JMMA.
Now that Abedin is suspected of mishandling classified material, Bachmann’s questions about Abedin’s security clearance are piquant in retrospect. But when she first raised them, Bachmann was ridiculed and vilified, even earning a denunciation from John McCain: “These sinister accusations rest solely on a few unspecified and unsubstantiated associations of members of Huma’s family, none of which have been shown to harm or threaten the United States in any way. These attacks on Huma have no logic, no basis, and no merit. And they need to stop now.”
It was actually about more than just Abedin’s family, and a perfectly sound case could be made, in light of Obama’s foreign policy disasters, that Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood links possibly did harm and threaten the United States. But Bachmann’s name was dragged through the mud in 2012 for talking about all this, and now none of the new allegations against Abedin raise any issue with her possible Muslim Brotherhood connections.
That few people care about those connections, and that those who do are dismissed as “far-Right bigots,” shows how myopic and foolish our contemporary political culture is. If Huma Abedin had a hand in the pro-Muslim Brotherhood tilt of the Obama/Clinton State Department, that would be a far graver offense than anything she is accused of now, just as old Capone was guilty of far greater crimes than tax evasion. But on the other hand, those tax evasion charges ended Capone’s operations for good, and so if Hillary’s infamous email server does the same to Huma Abedin, no one who values America’s historic role as leader of the free world will have any reason to complain.