Thursday, March 27, 2014

Breaking: House Amnesty Vote Could Come at Any Time‏

A very interesting post from HTTPS://PrayFor.US about the Discharge Petition for H.R. 15 in the House of Representatives. This follows this previous post about it. REMEMBER, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.
You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!

Please call & send this to the Representatives listed after the letter! http://www.house.gov/representatives/

Honorable Representative,
House Democrats and a few Republicans-In-Name-Only have launched an amnesty sneak attack on us all.
They've just announced a Discharge Petition on HR 15, an amnesty bill that is almost a word-for-word copy of the "Gang of Eight" bill that passed in the Senate.
Under the Hastert Rule in the House, a bill can only proceed to the House floor for a vote if a majority of the majority party supports the bill.
However, if a majority of Representatives sign a so-called Discharge Petition -- in this case, every Democrat and a handful of Republicans -- that bill is "discharged from its Committee assignment.
If the Democrats can gather enough Republican signatures today or tomorrow, the amnesty bill will pass!
I cannot stress to you how dangerously close we are to losing our country right now!
This Discharge Petition has 200 signatures already, including 3 Republican signatures.
The Democrats only need to convince 18 House Republicans to sign the Discharge Petition and then HR 15 will pass in the House!
However, we recommend that you contact the entire House Republican Caucus and urge them to reject the Discharge Petition.  There are 170 House Republicans who, to this date, have never stated whether they are FOR or AGAINST amnesty for illegal aliens.
House Speaker John Boehner, who openly supports amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens, has stated that amnesty has "no chance" of passing the House this year.
We knew that this was a lie.
We knew that Boehner was saying this to lull all pro-American opposition groups to sleep.
The pro-amnesty crowd has been biding their time, gathering signatures and promises, and waiting for the opportunity to strike.
That time is now.
If you "love your neighbor as yourself," as Jesus commands us to do in Matthew 22:39, you must take action on this today.
Amnesty for illegal aliens who have broken our laws is not "loving your neighbor." It is an act of hatred against the American Republic.
Our jobs, our homes, our fortunes and our very way of life are at stake in this fight. We must not give in and allow the politicians to give our country away!
Therefore, reject the Discharge Petition for HR 15!
Expecting your support,
 
John Boehner (OH)
Mark Amodei (NV)
Ken Calvert (CA)
Eric Cantor (VA)
Jeff Denham (CA)
Charlie Dent (PA)
Mario Diaz-Balart (FL)
Renee Ellmers (NC)
Joe Heck (NV)
Peter King (NY)
Kevin McCarthy (CA)
Michael McCaul (TX)
Buck McKeon (CA)
Cathy Rodgers (WA)
Paul Ryan (WI)
Glenn Thompson (PA)
Marlin Stutzman (IN)
David Valadao (CA)
Steve Pearce (NM)
Dave Reichert (WA)


Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Homosexuality & Same Sex Attraction (SSA)

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about overcoming same-sex attraction, an article you can give to someone you know who has it. This follows this post about the nuclear dangers from Russia. This follows this post about Pope Francis I.  For a free magazine subscription or to get the book shown for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632. You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!






Homosexuality & Same Sex Attraction (SSA)


It’s important for everyone to truly understand this subject. It’s especially important if you are experiencing SSA or someone you love is experiencing it. This article uses our own church history to clarify many aspects of this subject. Today, we feel very ashamed of our general lack of understanding, sensitivity and love 50+ years ago. Since then, we have had dramatic growth in our understanding and attitudes. We hope and pray that our church (which carries the name United Church of God since 1995 and referred to as UCG in this article) will be an ideal spiritual home for anyone with SSA who sincerely desires to learn and live by God’s Word, the Bible, in preparation for eternal life in God’s Kingdom.
 
 
Satan is the author of terrible confusion! Currently one area of enormous confusion is people’s sexual orientation.
 
In place of “homosexual orientation,” we feel it is more clear to say “same sex attraction” or SSA.
 
I first began to study this subject in 1974 when I became the pastor of a congregation in which one man had experienced SSA for as long as he could remember. In recent years, I have written on this subject, but my decision to write this article was triggered by a seminar on SSA conducted by our church in Seattle, Washington, on July 18, 2009. The presenter, Dennis Luker, specifically addressed the subject of understanding and helping people with SSA that God has called to be in His church. That is the focus of this article.
 
Mr. Luker began by describing his background. The first congregation he pastored was in San Francisco, but he really began to understand homosexuality after he was transferred to Seattle in 1980. There a church member with a homosexual background began ongoing counseling and invited Denny to go with him to a seminar put on by Exodus International. (EI is the world’s largest umbrella organization for coordinating worldwide efforts to help people come out of a homosexual lifestyle.) That was the beginning of Denny’s eye-opening education regarding homosexuality and SSA.
 
Following are the major points in Mr. Luker’s seminar
 
  • There is a big difference between those who choose to experiment with homosexual acts and someone who has had SSA ever since he or she can remember.
  • Many who struggle with SSA have never engaged in a homosexual act.
  • There have always been and always will be members of the church (and/or their children) who struggle with SSA.
  • In the past, very few members of the church understood this subject well enough to help themselves or their family members.
  • SSA is not primarily a sex problem—it is a love problem. (For example, many of the men with SSA were not loved sufficiently by their fathers and many of the women were not loved sufficiently by their mothers.) These are people whose underlying hunger is to experience real love, usually because they missed out on it when they were very young.
  • The strugglers need to deeply know how much God loves them.
  • They also need to experience love from family and/or friends, especially those of the same sex. (In fact, a major way that we come to know God’s love is when it is flowing through other people to us.) People with SSA are some of the loneliest people in the world (and in the church).
 
Our church has come a long way!
 
Thankfully, our church has come a long, long way in our understanding and attitudes about people with same sex attraction.
 
The primary focus of this article is not about people who choose to engage in homosexual activity for one reason or the other. (That is primarily a behavior problem, not a mental orientation problem. When those people are called, they must simply repent and choose to stop the immorality!)
 
Nor is this article even about people with homosexual orientation that God is not yet calling—not yet opening their minds to spiritual understanding. It is about people who have felt ingrained SSA as far back as they can remember, whom God has called or is calling into His Church, and who have been or will be struggling against the temptations. I frequently will call them strugglers.
 
We know that from the very beginning of God’s Church, God has been calling people out of every kind of immoral lifestyle, both heterosexual and homosexual (1 Corinthians 6:9-10). Paul went on to say, “And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God” (verse 11, emphasis added throughout).
 
God’s Ten Commandments are shorthand statements that refer to ten large categories of sins. The seventh Commandment, “You shall not commit adultery,” means that God forbids all sexual sins, including adultery, fornication, homosexuality and bestiality.
 
God forbids sinful thoughts as well as sinful actions. Jesus said, "You have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:27-28). Sexual lust is erotic craving.
 
The principle of what Jesus said about mental “lust for” a woman being “adultery” surely applies to a woman lusting for a man and for anyone lusting for someone of the same sex.
 
But we also know that temptation to sin is not of itself a sin. Temptations often do not proceed to sinful actions or even mental lust. Even Jesus “was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15). Most men, and some women, are tempted to commit fornication, adultery, and/or homosexual acts, but the temptations by themselves are not sins.
 
A temptation can be just a momentary thought to do wrong. But when a person willingly dwells on such thoughts and entertains them rather than rejecting them, he is lusting. To avoid lusting, he or she must quickly replace wrong thoughts with good thoughts.
 
What about the word “attraction”? We generally think of sexual “attraction” to the opposite sex as being a healthy mental orientation that God intended. It is not sinful and not necessarily even a temptation to sin. So when someone has sexual attraction toward the same sex, while it is not the healthy mental orientation that God intended, isn’t it logical to conclude that the mere attraction is not sinful and not necessarily a temptation to sinful action? (Obviously sexual attractions can easily lead to sexual temptations which can lead to lust which can lead to sinful actions, whether heterosexual or homosexual.)
 
Were homosexuals born that way or did they choose that way?
Or neither?
 
This subject is often polarized as a dichotomy—as if there are only two explanations—that a person with SSA was either born that way or that he chose that way. But for most people with SSA who feel they were born that way, there is another explanation.
 
People who feel like they have always had a homosexual orientation are people, at least in most cases, who had less than ideal experience in the first years of childhood, so their SSA feelings go back as far as they can remember. In childhood, they had too little of good experiences (like love, affection and affirmation) or too much of bad experiences (like physical, verbal or sexual abuse) or some of both. As a result, they are emotionally wounded. But their SSA seems “natural” to them.
 
There has never been any evidence that sexual orientation is genetic. However it is likely that some people are born with more of a predisposition to SSA than others. As a comparison, it seems that some people are born with some predisposition to alcoholism, drug addiction, overeating, etc. (Incidentally, an alcoholic is not sinning when he merely feels a desire to drink. A person with SSA is not sinning when he merely feels a desire for sex.)
 
The main point is this: Many people with ingrained SSA did not choose to have that attraction. They have had SSA ever since they can remember. Many have tried to change that orientation by willpower, prayer, Bible study and everything they could think of and have usually failed. They feel helpless and hopeless. (Of course, they must choose not to do anything immoral. They, like every other child of God, must exercise self-control to avoid sinful actions and lustful thoughts.)
 
Some of our church history
 
When I first became serious about God in 1962, it seems the whole subject of homosexuality was just coming “out of the closet.” At age 21, if I had ever personally known someone with SSA, I was not aware of it. “Queers” had just been a topic of crude jokes and remarks.
 
Attitudes in the church at that time weren’t very different. The impression often given was that homosexuality was an “abomination” and about the worst of sins—demonized as almost the unpardonable sin that deserved the hottest fires of hell. There was a lot of verbal stone-throwing and not much healing.
 
In conversations, seldom did one distinguish between those who only had a homosexual orientation and those actively engaged in a gay lifestyle. Usually it was all painted with one broad brush.
 
It was also a topic of derisive humor, ridiculing the “queers” and “perverts.” To joke about them was a sure way to get a laugh. Often someone would mimic an effeminate voice and an effeminate gesture (even though many homosexuals are not effeminate and many effeminate men are not homosexuals).
 
It seemed that by ridiculing homosexual men as repulsive untouchables, a man was proving both how macho he was and how spiritual he was. (People who feel insecure have a special need to “prove” themselves.)
 
Paradoxically, the attitudes of heterosexual men about lesbianism are often much less critical. Why the double standard?
 
And think of the blatant hypocrisy of people who have been much more condemning of homosexual sins than heterosexual sins! Perhaps many of the self-righteous critics had previously engaged in heterosexual fornication, adultery and/or pornography. We humans are prone to invent our self-serving definitions of what is more evil and what is less evil.
 
In the 1960’s, our church was unprepared as to how to welcome, counsel and befriend the people with SSA that God was calling. Rather than “hate the sin but love the sinner,” the church’s message sounded like “hate the sinner also.”
 
Our church and probably most Christian churches were making the mistake of portraying SSA—inner temptations and feelings—as sinful. This had a devastating effect on those with SSA. That erroneous idea led those with SSA to reason this way: “If God hates my inner feelings, and I can’t separate my feelings from me, then God must hate me.” The flaws in the church’s message quickly discouraged most strugglers from pursuing interest in the church.
 
When someone with SSA did request a ministerial visit, he usually was fearful to open up and request counseling for his SSA. Most of them were accustomed to being secretive about their desires, and in our church culture, most did not dare share their secret, even with a church pastor. So most of them just faked heterosexuality.
 
Many who attended our church services often heard about how terribly evil were homosexual sins, but heard almost nothing indicating understanding, compassion and kindness toward the strugglers. And they usually did not hear any invitation to strugglers to come for confidential and empathetic counseling designed to bring about God’s healing, grace and spiritual growth.
 
At the same time, it was difficult for the struggler to know how to initiate and build strong healthy friendships with church members, especially those of the same sex (which was so badly needed). They didn’t even realize this was what they needed because no one was teaching them that.
 
In many cases, their feelings of guilt, shame, fear, hopelessness and despair often became overwhelming and they quit attending services. Not surprisingly, the attitudes of many later turned into resentment, anger and bitterness. Thankfully, there are some with SSA who have stayed in the church, and they have been a valuable resource for helping us understand SSA and many related issues.
 
Our growth in understanding and some lessons learned
 
Over the years, we’ve learned many biblical truths much more clearly and deeply. We have come to much better understand God’s grace and God’s love for every single human being—love that He has had for us all along, even long before we began to repent (Romans 5:6-11).
 
We’ve learned that we must love everyone, even our enemies and even the “chief” of sinners, as Paul called himself (1 Timothy 1:15). We’ve learned not to compare ourselves among ourselves. We’ve learned that everyone desperately needs love and to feel loved—and that character and personality problems often are the results of people being abused, neglected, abandoned or treated coldly, especially if those problems occurred in early childhood. “Unlovable” people are generally the people who are most in need of love.
 
We’ve learned that all of us are messed up—we all have our unique combination of insanity—yet we are still tempted to minimize our own flaws and maximize those of others. We’re learning that we had better be merciful because we increasingly see our need for God’s mercy!
 
My specific learning experiences about SSA? First of all, I’ve had a lot of relatives and friends with many different kinds of struggles—smoking, alcoholism, drug addiction, broken marriages, etc., etc. So ever since God called me, I’ve had a strong interest in helping members to “break free” of personal problems.
 
Shortly after I started regular church attendance in 1962, I learned of fellow members who had been involved with homosexuality. That made me realize that SSA was more of a widespread issue than I had thought.
 
Then in 1974, when I was pastoring a church in Nebraska, I became aware that a man in my congregation struggled with SSA. I had learned enough about godly love for everyone by that time that I tried to be a good brother and friend to him. I think he left the church after I was transferred away from there.
 
After being transferred to Texas in 1991, a man in my congregation had come out of an active gay lifestyle and had become a church member, but he continued to be strongly tempted to go back into that lifestyle. I tried my best to help him but he eventually left the church. For people with strong temptations, it’s tough to stay on the right track.
 
During my dialogues and efforts with these strugglers, I gained a lot of understanding. Then in 1990, Dennis Luker wrote an eye-opening article for our church’s magazine, titled “Hope for Homosexuals”. And in 1994, our church’s magazine carried an article by Mr. Luker and John Halford titled “Homosexuality: Understanding the Struggle.” These articles were a giant steps forward in understanding for the church.
 
Others have pioneered in our understanding, including Melvin Rhodes. He helped to pioneer and promote the Anchor Web site, which was the forerunner of this Breaking Free Web site. I began helping with that project in 2004.
I also would like to compliment the writers of our church’s booklet, Marriage & Family: The Missing Dimension. The section titled “Is Homosexuality Acceptable to God?” is well written. It is not condemning of homosexuals and it does not label SSA as sin.
 
The booklet makes it clear that it is homosexual lust and acting out that is sinful, not mere SSA. In addressing what is sinful, notice the emphasis on actions from these words and phrases that are repeatedly used in that booklet: lifestyle, homosexual activity, homosexual practices, homosexual acts, homosexual behavior.
 
Near the end of that section is this statement: “It is also important to understand the difference between homosexual orientation and homosexual lust and behavior. The orientation is not a sin but the lust and behavior is.”
 
Priorities in counseling prospective members and members with SSA
 
Many of the Christian churches go to one wrong extreme or the other. Some continue to sound condemning of anyone with a homosexual orientation, some are condoning homosexual lifestyles, and some try to coerce new believers to quickly get “repaired” so they will be fully heterosexual. We in UCG strongly disagree with all of those ditches. Our goal is to learn, preach and practice the pure and balanced light of truth from God’s Word.
 
We know we must define sin without compromise and preach repentance, but we also must give lots of encouragement and hope. To do this well requires understanding, compassion, mercy and kindness. As we encourage strugglers to take one step at a time, we can help them make decisions based on God’s priorities.
 
We try not think of SSA by itself as an issue of morality. As long as a person remains celibate—does not engage in sexual acts with another—that person is doing well morally.
 
After stopping immoral activity, the next step is to work on the thoughts and heart. That begins with repentance, baptism, coming under God’s grace and receiving His Holy Spirit. It means to replace the leaven of sin with the unleavened bread of truth and obedience to God (1 Corinthians 5:7-8). To replace hatred and coldness with love for God and love for fellow man (Matthew 5:43-48). To replace the “works of the flesh” with the “fruit of the Holy Spirit” (Galatians 5:19-23). This includes fighting against lusts of all kinds—“the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life” (1 John 2:16).
 
When we preach about hating sin, we try to emphasize God’s love for all sinners—and about how we must follow God’s example of having respect, kindness and hospitality to every brother and sister in Christ. When we bring up the subject of homosexuality, we try to assume that someone sitting in the congregation is struggling with SSA and is already emotionally wounded. We pray that all our words are words of healing and not hurting.
 
We must all emphasize God’s love and grace. “There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit” (Romans 8:1). A converted member who still has SSA should not feel condemned.
 
God doesn’t quit loving us even when we slip up and sin. If we are baptized and under God’s grace, we don’t fall out of grace each time we sin. We keep repenting, confessing and asking for help, and God will keep forgiving. People who are trying to overcome any kind of sin can slip up. When we fall down, just get back up and keep going forward.
 
We don’t try to influence people with SSA to seek reparative therapy, especially when the goal of the therapy is to transform the person from homosexual attraction to heterosexual attraction. The Bible says nothing about pursuing a goal of making everyone heterosexual. And we don’t push people with SSA into heterosexual dating and marriage. That will not solve the underlying problems. That can be disastrous for both people. The goal God gives us is conversion to holiness, not conversion to heterosexuality. The goal is to be oriented to God and all things godly, not to be sexually oriented to the opposite gender. (If the latter also happens, that’s a bonus.)
 
We want to be a true friend and brother or sister to the struggler, and continue to help him or her with the huge challenge of trying to enter new territory—fellowshipping with, bonding with and developing true friendships with other Christians of the same sex. No one can pull himself up by his own bootstraps. The struggler needs the help of a church culture that is forgiving, accepting, respectful and loving. We need to offer that help.
 
A person who is coming out of a homosexual practices has a two-fold struggle. Somewhere along the way his craving for love became sexualized. Therefore, in addition to battling sexual temptations, he is still also struggling with the underlying craving for love and bonding from people of his same gender. This is why his struggles may be more complex and difficult that someone resisting heterosexual sexual temptations.
 
Then after the person is baptized and is close to God, and after the person has developed close friendships with others of the same sex, then that person might want to try professional counseling and therapy, with one of the goals being to decrease his SSA. With spiritual growth the person might experience a growing attraction to the opposite sex and might even become desirous of marriage. But a person can be a spiritually-strong child of God and never experience attraction to the opposite sex. Remember that marriage is not for everyone, as Paul so emphatically explains in 1 Corinthians 7.
 
We can direct the struggler to helpful books, Web sites and organizations for further understanding and guidance.
 
The goal of every child of God, no matter his or her background, is to “seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness” (Matthew 6:33). Let’s remind each other to keep our eyes on the goal and to keep going forward, even when it seems like just baby steps.
 
May we understand and fully believe what Jesus said: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved” (John 3:16-17).

NBC Host: “White Men Have Small Testicles,” Wears “Whiteface,” Mocks Whites in Songs


A timely post about from www.debbieschlussel.com about a black person mocking white people. This follows this post about the 9th Circuit court upholding a suspension for a student wearing a U.S. flag in the U.S.! This follows this post about a principal in Texas being fired for requesting all students speak English so that nobody feels bullied when others talk about them in Spanish or any other language. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.
You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!

NBC Host: “White Men Have Small Testicles,” Wears “Whiteface,” Mocks Whites in Songs

By Debbie Schlussel
If a White person did this, he would be out of a job and denounced worldwide. Heck, all Paula Deen did was admit she once used the N-word years ago, and she lost everything. But, if you’re Black (or Muslim or one of the other preferred minority groups), you can get away with racism and racist caricatures.
nickcannonwhite

nickcannon

Nick Cannon, host of NBC’s “America’s Got Talent” (which is owned by Simon Cowell), is dressing in “Whiteface” and mocking White men as having small testicles. All of this is to promote the impending release of his album, “White People Party Music.” The husband of Mariah Carey and father of her twins is a racist. But Black-on-White racism is tolerated, as NBC hasn’t announced any plans to remove Cannon from the show, hasn’t denounced him or his behavior, and is strangely silent . . . along with the rest of the world of race merchants.
Nick Cannon, the host of NBC’s “America’s Got Talent” and Mr. Mariah Carey, is now posing as a man named Connor Smallnut for a new musical project. And yes, Connor Smallnut, as you can see in the photo above and videos below, is white. . . . .







whitepeoplepartymusic

Cannon has been posting photos and videos of himself as Mr. Smallnut, whiteface and all, on his Instagram and Twitter feeds in order to hype up the release of his upcoming album, “White People Party Music.” The album is a sort of parody performed by the Smallnut character, with songs like “Pajama Pants,” which tackle heavy issues like twerking.
Hmmm . . . if a White artist–say, John Mayer–dressed in Blackface, called himself, “Tyrone Jajuan LaBobby Crack Addict Large Penis 12-Kids-With-Thirteen-Women-on-Welfare,” and titled his next album, “No, You Di’i'n’t: Black People Crack House Pit Bull Fightin’ Musick,” that would be racist. Do you think he’d still be around?
Wouldn’t the world be up in arms as they were over Al Campanis, Don Imus, Michael Richards, and Paula Deen?
But for Nick Cannon . . . crickets chirping.
Exit Question: if Nick Cannon hates White people so much, why did he marry a half-White woman and father two kids with her? I guess that’s his way of “screwing Whitey.” I guess it’s like anti-Semite (and Matt Drudge fave) Alex Jones, who hates “Zionists” and Israel, but is married to a moronic nutbagette Jewish chick. Or Jew-hater Christiane (a)Manpour who is married to a Jewish chick with a non-working penis (Jamie Rubin from the Clinton State Department).


Alice in Arabia: ABC Finally Pledges to Show Muslim Threat in TV Show; HAMAS Co-Conspirator Upset

A very interesting post from www.debbieschlussel.com about a U.S. TV show that got canceled. This follows this post about a U.S. magazine pointing out the child brides of Islam. This follows this post about a Muslim in the U.S. House of Representatives addressing an anti-American group. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more about what you can do to get more involved click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE. You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!




Alice in Arabia: ABC Finally Pledges to Show Muslim Threat in TV Show; HAMAS Co-Conspirator Upset


By Debbie Schlussel
**** SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATE ****
Is ABC finally seeing the light on the Islamic threat to the West? Probably not, but in a “pigs fly” departure from its usual politically correct programming, the network’s ABC Family channel on cable bought the rights to develop the drama, “Alice in Arabia,” for possible addition to its schedule, next season. Since it apparently shows a true depiction of Islam and what it does to Westerners, the unindicted HAMAS co-conspirator CAIR is up in arms, as is the pro-Hezbollah/HAMAS ADC. Given their whines, don’t hold your breath for the show to ever make it to the air. And, if it does, the truth will be whitewashed and the show entirely changed.
abcfamilyislamiccrescent

brookeeikmeier

Hooah! US Army NSA Middle East Specialist Brooke Eikmeier, Creator of “Alice in Arabia”
The theme of the show is that Alice, a kidnapped American, is stuck in Saudi Arabia, where her Muslim family members live, and she’s trying to escape. ‘Cuz, hey, that would never ever happen, right? I mean, Muslims have never ever ever ever kidnapped their American kids and held them in captivity in the Middle East. And we can’t have truthful depictions like that reaching the eyes of stupid Americans who normally watch “Pretty Little Liars.”
ABC Family has added three drama pilots to its development slate. . . . Here’s a look at the three dramas:
Alice in Arabia is a high-stakes drama about a rebellious American teenage girl who, after tragedy befalls her parents, is unknowingly kidnapped by her extended family, who are Saudi Arabian.








Alice finds herself a stranger in a new world but is intrigued by its offerings and people, whom she finds surprisingly diverse in their views on the world and her situation. Now a virtual prisoner in her grandfather’s royal compound, Alice must count on her independent spirit and wit to find a way to return home while surviving life behind the veil. The pilot was written by Brooke Eikmeier, who previously served in the U.S. Army as a cryptologic linguist in the Arabic language, trained to support NSA missions in the Middle East. She left service in September 2013 as a rank E-4 specialist.
Wow, that sounds totally made up. That could never happen in real life. Just ask Betty Mahmoody and the tens of thousands of other American mothers who were stupid enough to marry and/or have children with Muslims who kidnapped them back to the “homeland,” too.
And what on earth would an infidel U.S. Army cryptologic linguist in Arabic, who worked for the NSA in the Middle East, actually know about Arabs, Muslims, or the Middle East?
We all know that in the real world, Muslims never kidnap their children, never treat women like dirt, never engage in terrorist acts, and are fine, upstanding cultured, civilized individuals, whose habits and mores are far more advanced and modern than those of the rest of us.
The only terrorists and kidnappers are Russians, Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, Wiccans, and lacto-ovo lesbian astronauts on “Dancing With the Stars.”
Yeah, that’s the ticket. Or, at least it will be, as long as HAMAS CAIR–which even the Obama Administration Justice Department officials said is a conspirator in HAMAS terrorism–whines the loudest and gets dhimmi dhummi Hollywood executives to bow down to allah.
So, how long ’til ABC Family either shelves “Alice in Arabia” or revamps it entirely to show us what fabulous, peaceful, contemporary people Muslims are?
3-2-1 . . .
**** UPDATE: The thing about this show that does, indeed, bother me is the part where kidnapped Alice of Arabia find the people of Saudia Arabia “surprisingly diverse in their views on the world and her situation.” That’s where this show will be “revamped” to reflect HAMASCAIR’s demands.
Um, there ain’t no diversity there . . . unless you count the varying ideas they have of ways to torture and murder Americans, Jews, Christians, and other infidels. They are pretty much monolithic there in terms of the most important thing: THEY. HATE. US. It’s Islam, stupid. It ain’t diverse.

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Russia's Dangerous Nuclear Arsenal

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the nuclear dangers from Russia. This follows this post about Pope Francis I.  For a free magazine subscription or to get the book shown for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632. You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!




Russia's Dangerous Nuclear Arsenal

Printer-friendly version


In some ways the world is closer to nuclear conflict than in the 1950s and '60s. Then, at least, the Soviet nuclear forces were under tight control and the military was well paid.

"Russian military officers stared wide-eyed at the glowing image on their radar screens: an incoming missile on course to hit Moscow in 15 minutes ... One buzz went to the three nuclear code briefcases assigned to President Boris Yeltsin and his top two military officials. The officer carrying Yeltsin's case rushed to the President and flipped it open. On an electronic map inside, they saw a bright dot over the Norwegian Sea. Beneath the map was a row of buttons, offering a menu of attack options on targets in the U.S. On military bases across Russia, red lights flashed and horns blared, alerting the troops in charge of the country's strategic nuclear weapons to get ready to use them."
This may sound like another plot out of a Hollywood blockbuster, but it isn't. It really happened on Jan. 25, 1995. Then why are we still alive?
"Yeltsin and his military commanders, linked by phone, waited to hear whether an attack had been confirmed. About 12 minutes after the mystery missile soared onto the radar screens, military analysts could see that it was not heading for Russian territory. It turned out to be a Norwegian scientific rocket sent aloft to observe the aurora borealis. The Norwegians had dutifully notified the Russian embassy in Oslo, but the word was never relayed to the military. 'For a while,' says Sergei Yushenkov, a member of the Russian parliament's Defense Committee, 'the world was on the brink of nuclear war' " ( Newsweek, "Nuclear Disarray" (May 19, 1997).

Mix-ups Common

In light of this scenario, Russia's December announcement that, in spite of its precarious financial condition it intended to deploy the Topol-M, should cause the world serious concern. The Topol-M is a powerful new intercontinental ballistic missile.
U.S. News & World Report asked in a headline, "Just When You Thought You Were Safe ... Could a False Alarm Still Start a Nuclear War?" (Feb. 10, 1997).
Conditions leading to the possibility of potentially catastrophic mix-ups are becoming more prevalent. The Newsweek article reports that, because of the lack of maintenance of their nuclear arsenal, "the Russians might wrongly think they were under attack from the West and fire their rockets. This danger has greatly increased because the Russian early-warning system is not what it used to be. It has lost major radar stations in the new nations of Ukraine, Latvia and others. Some of its satellite-tracking stations have gone to Ukraine, Georgia and Kazakhstan. The high command is now partially blind, which increases its apprehensions, produces false alarms and makes good decisions harder."
The U.S. News article describes human mistakes bringing us to the brink of disaster not once, but several times: "Human error is more than a theoretical concern. In the Norwegian case, Moscow had been notified in advance of the launch, but no one thought to pass word to senior military officials. In more than one instance, real launch orders have been transmitted by mistake during American nuclear training exercises. And in 1979, the inadvertent introduction of training data into the NORAD [North American Aerospace Defense] early warning system computer mimicked a large Soviet attack. Soviet leaders got the same treatment in 1983, as a solar storm duped early warning satellites into indicating a massive U.S. attack."
Defense Minister Igor Rodinov goes even further in the Newsweek article: "Last year [1996], the nuclear strategic forces received 10.5 percent of the funds needed for maintenance. The result, he predicts, is that, 'We may lose the entire system.' The links between radar and headquarters, the computer management of missiles and the physical security of the warheads could all break down."
To add to their woes, troops of the Strategic Nuclear Forces (SNF) are earning an average of $100 to $200 a month—when they are paid. The same article reports, "One major, who has served 24 years in the SNF and will retire in six months, did not see a paycheck for four months." Another officer commented: "We're living in poverty. That's all you need to know."
The Newsweek article concludes: "The potential is there for some form of nuke-napping—grabbing weapons for ransom or nuclear blackmail—or sales to rogue states or terrorists, or unauthorized launches by renegade commanders. Some Russians even fret about a nuclear civil war. If a region in Siberia were to declare its independence, a retired senior officer in Moscow speculates, 'The entire missile force in the area might cut itself off from the chain of command and control and get re-programmed to be able to launch at will.'"

False Sense of Security

Meanwhile, the world is being lulled into thinking everything is peachy when it's not. Another Newsweek article, from June 2, 1997, mentioned the mood in the United States: "The country has rarely felt so secure from the threat of war. The bomb silos on the Great Plains are on their way to becoming curious museums; to today's children, the three little triangles that denote bomb shelters might as well be an odd form of teenage graffiti" (page 4).
Yet, in some ways, we are closer to nuclear war than we were in the 1950s and '60s. Then, at least, the nuclear forces were well controlled and well paid. At that time only two superpowers were eyeing each other. Now a host of nations could detonate nuclear bombs. Russia still has an estimated 22,000 nuclear warheads and the United States 12,000. Last year was a bad one for Russia's economy, and the troops have not seen their lot improved.
On the other hand, breakdowns in the strategic nuclear system were so alarming in 1997 that, at the urgings of Americans, some improvements took place in 1998 to increase the security of the nuclear arsenal. "Not all the news from Moscow is bad," reports Newsweek . "Russia has sharply upgraded security at more than 30 sites containing fissile material" (May 25, 1998).
Yet many problems remain. How long will the underfed and underpaid forces go on without something giving? What about deficient radar systems? Will they continue to deteriorate as funds become scarcer? No one knows, but the dangers of mix-ups, accidents or thefts are real.

Nuclear Threats

Some think that, since Russia's warheads are no longer targeted at U.S. cities and military bases (and the United States is trying to persuade China to adopt a similar policy), the world is much safer. But this is simply not true. The difference between having missiles aimed or not is simply a matter of a minutes. The missiles' computer memory retains their former targets, and they can quickly be reprogrammed.
As long as Russia remains unstable economically and politically, a distinct military threat exists, especially because Russian possesses such a large nuclear arsenal. The rest of the world cannot breathe a sigh of relief, particularly America.
Based on recent developments, it appears the world's dangerous nuclear arsenal will continue to spread, especially as other nations, including India and Pakistan, join the nuclear club. Only recently the United States announced it would upgrade and modernize its nuclear missile systems so they would be in optimum condition beyond the year 2025. In spite of its economic weakness, Russia, along with other nations of the nuclear club, will attempt to do the same.
As we stand poised to enter the 21st century, the world remains dangerously overstocked with high-tech nuclear weapons, and they will be an even greater threat as less-stable and more-radical powers gain access to the technology.
Jesus Christ's prophecy in Matthew:24:22 seems especially sobering when we consider the threat facing our generation and the next: "And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved ..."
Our disregard of the continuing nuclear threat also brings to mind another warning by Jesus Christ: Don't assume the world is safe when it is not. He tells us to beware of the attitude that will prevail among mankind shortly before God's intervention in human affairs:
"But take heed to yourselves, lest your hearts be weighed down with carousing, drunkenness, and cares of this life, and that Day come on you unexpectedly. For it will come as a snare on all those who dwell on the face of the whole earth. Watch therefore, and pray always that you may be counted worthy to escape all these things that will come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man" (Luke:21:34-36).
Conditions are not really improving on the nuclear front, especially as other nations such as Iran, Iraq and Libya strive to join the nuclear club. Governments and military planners are rightly worry about terrorist groups gaining access to nuclear technology and material. This is not the time to be lulled into a false sense of security. GN

Selective Tolerance? Can you wear an American flag in the U.S. on Cinco de Mayo?


A timely post about from www.yaf.org about the 9th Circuit court upholding a suspension for a student wearing a U.S. flag in the U.S.! This follows this post about a principal in Texas being fired for requesting all students speak English so that nobody feels bullied when others talk about them in Spanish or any other language. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.
You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!

Selective Tolerance?

Order a free copy of the latest edition of the Campus Conservative Battleplan.

3/12/2014 Posted by Ashley Pratte
Ban FlagAbout a week ago, I walked into class reading an article about the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' unanimous decision to uphold a high school's policy barring students from wearing American flag clothing on Cinco de Mayo. The largest court of appeals in the United States ruled that such a ban did not violate its students' constitutional right to the freedom of expression, due process, or equal protection under the law because it was intended to quell possible racial tensions.
But, this decision should not have been particularly surprising. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is not only the most liberal circuit court in the country, but it also has a rich history of being the most reversed by the Supreme Court. One term in the mid-1990s, the circuit court saw 27 of its 28 decisions reversed or vacated by the high court.
As my class was about to begin, a classmate walked in wearing a red Soviet Union CCCP t-shirt complete with the hammer and sickle. The dichotomy could not have been clearer.
The United States government had literally just upheld a ban on clothing containing our country's own flag; yet a student was perfectly free to sport the flag of the Soviet Union-a dictatorial regime that was synonymous with brutal oppression, devoid of individual liberty, and responsible for the death of over 23 MILLION people-whenever and wherever he so pleased (regardless of the escalating tensions between Russia and the former Soviet Republic of Ukraine).                                                            
I asked him if he planned to sport a Swastika armband, an Iraqi National Progressive Front hat, or a Rwandan Interahamwe hoodie to our next class. He was speechless.
This ban is characteristic of a larger trend of censorship in schools dating back to the 1969 Supreme Court decision in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. This landmark decision allowed "schools to forbid conduct that would 'materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of the school."' While there is a undeniable need for ensuring safe and productive learning environments, school administrations have invoked this ambiguous language to claim more and more circumstances as interferences.
Fort Collins High School in Colorado blocked its student council selected theme, 'Merica Monday, for a day during spirit week because, according to a member of the council, "they didn't want to offend anyone." The member continued, "I'm personally outraged at the school that we can celebrate every other culture but our own. We have activities that go on during Cinco de Mayo, but we can't celebrate and honor our own country [where] we live."
Canyon High School in Anaheim Hills, California, refused to allow a girl to enter because her National Rifle Association t-shirt was said to encourage violence, while 14-year-old Jared Marcum is facing a fine and up to a year in prison for refusing to remove his National Rifle Association t-shirt at school.
Schools have even gone as far as to ban certain colors due to their associations. One school in Yuba County, California banned the colors 'red' and 'blue' because of their use by gangs, while an elementary school in Frisco, Texas banned its students from wearing the colors of red and green during the winter holiday season.
Tinker also says, "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."  In fact, Justice Fortas, who delivered the majority opinion, deemed it significant to make that clarification first. He continued, "undifferentiated fear or apprehension of disturbance is not enough to overcome the right to freedom of expression…School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students in school, as well as out of school, are "persons" under our Constitution." Perhaps the judicial and school systems should be reminded of these equally important lines the next time they motion to ban the American flag.


Robert Lucido is the President of the Conservative Club at Amherst College

Fax & Ask Dem. Reps. to Oppose Amnesty Discharge Petition‏

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com about a Discharge Petition attempt in the House of Representatives. This follows this post about an attempt to allow in-state tuition in Florida at taxpayer expense. REMEMBER, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more about what you can do click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.
You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!

You can find this fax request by proceeding to
https://www.numbersusa.com/faxes?ID=15898
This week, House Democrats will start a drive to collect signatures for a discharge petition to force movement on their amnesty legislation, H.R. 15. If more than half of the members of the House of Representatives sign the petition, the Speaker of the House must allow a floor vote of the legislation.
Please send a fax to your Democratic U.S. Representative and urge him/her not to sign the discharge petition and tell him/her why the legislation is bad.
H.R. 15 would:
  • give legal status and work permits to millions of illegal aliens without requiring any new border security provisions
  • more than double legal immigration numbers
  • increase unemployment and stagnate wages, according to the CBO
  • not stop future illegal immigration, according to the CBO
  • weaken border security by eliminating need for biometric entry/exit system
The NumbersUSA Action Team