Monday, February 21, 2011

The Two Big Battles : D.C. and Wisconsin

A very interesting post from www.hughhewitt.com about the D.C. Republicans on the Continuing Resolution on the Budget and Wisconsin's governor fighting for his state budget. This follows this post about the House Republicans possibly failing on the budget and and this article about  the recent news about ending the ban on offshore drilling which would encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran  and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!


The Two Big Battles

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt




My new Washington Examiner column reviews the stakes in the two big domestic battles underway in Madison and in D.C.



Scott Walker doesn't look the type who is for turning and he realizes he will never be stronger than right now. But that isn't true of all the GOP state senators, and if more than one or two crumble, the governor's task becomes much more difficult. It took just three Republicans in the United States Senate to inflict the stimulus on the country, and probably just as few in Wisconsin to throw away a crucial moment.



Rather than backpeddling, the legislators should be looking at the idea forwarded to me and put into my column: If teachers stay away, their students should instantly become eligible for vouchers.



The Beltway Republicans are hard to predict, and they certainly do not have a communications strategy in place, apparently for fear of being charged with shutting down the government.



They would not be, of course, shutting down a government. The House has passed a new funding resolution, one that barely scratches overall federal spending, but which the president and Democratic senators can turn into Waterloo if they want. If they do so, they will be shutting down the government, and as we are seeing in Wisconsin, the taxpaying public --the makers, not the takers-- have had it with being blackmailed by special interests.



The political class is now busy debating --see the New York Times this morning-- whether the GOP is "overreaching," another display of epic cluelessness about the situation in a country with near double-digit unemployment and where some regions are facing double-the-national-average in joblessness.



The key difference between 1995 and 2011 is that people know we are broker and they know the special interests are asking for us to borrow billions and billions more so they don't have to experience the austerity the rest of the country has already endured three years. The Republicans are doing the right things --the things they campaigned on-- in D.C. and across the new House CR. If they don't defend them now, when will they ever do so?

Wknd Box Office: Unknown, I Am Number Four, Cedar Rapids

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed. This follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch!



Wknd Box Office: Unknown, I Am Number Four, Cedar Rapids


By Debbie Schlussel



The relative best movie this weekend is aimed at teens and kids. The rest are skipworthy for various reasons.




* “Unknown”: Read my review column. Liam Neeson plays a man whose identity has been stolen from him and who is targeted by a hit squad after waking up from a coma. What could have been a great Hitchcock-esque conspiracy thriller collapses under the weight of ideological baloney promoting the “virtues” of Muslim illegal aliens and attacking agri-business. Again, read my complete review.



TWO MARXES PLUS A BIN LADEN





* “I Am Number Four“: This Disney movie is great for teens and kids and is devoid of any sex or other objectionable stuff usually contained in teen movies. And the first half or so of it was pretty good. Only in the last third did the movie become a little too messy.





John (Alex Pettyfer), looks like an all-American high-school-aged teen boy. But he’s not what he seems. In fact, he’s an alien–not an illegal one, but an extra-terrestrial one. His father (Timothy Olyphant) isn’t his father either. He’s a soldier from the same planet, looking out for John and protecting him from the alien killers who’ve killed most of John’s planet and have arrived here, trying to kill the few survivors, all of them kids, who’ve escaped to Earth.



As the alien assassins come closer to finding John, he and his faux-father escape to a small Ohio town, where John befriends a cute fellow high school student interested in photography, who has a blog with photos. Olyphant’s job, in the age of the internet, is to zap all photos and videos of John posted online, lest the alien assassin team find him that way. John also befriends an ostracized student whose father was obsessed with aliens and UFOs and mysteriously disappeared years ago. And then there are the jealous, competitive jocks.



Telling you more would give away the movie, but it wasn’t bad. And the scary looking aliens aren’t just scary, in a few scenes, they are funny. Not a great movie, but if you’re a teen, it’s good enough.



ONE REAGAN



* “Cedar Rapids“: This was one of the crappy movies Michigan residents paid for with the generous Michigan Film Tax Credit. I hated it. It’s nothing more than a dumb, long, slow boring attack on small town life, small town values, conservatives’ social and family values, and chock full of dumb and sick jokes.



Ed Helms, John C. Reilly, and Anne Heche (who looks better in red hair, her color in this movie) play Midwestern insurance agents at a convention. The naive, unworldly (is there any other way Hollywood sees middle America?) Helms is sent there from his small town, after the top agent in his office is found dead from asphyxiation during a perverted sex act. Helms, himself, is sleeping with his former school teacher, Susan “Sigourney” Weaver. When Helms gets to the convention, his assignment is to win his insurance agency the top rating it wins each year.



But, instead, Helms ends up sleeping with the married Heche, getting drunk, and skinny-dipping in the hotel pool. This displeases the religious conservative head of the insurance convention and the body that gives out the multi-star ratings. But, no worries, because Helms learns that this man allegedly has gay sex or some other such impropriety and can be blackmailed and bribed into giving Helms’ insurance agency the highest rating.



And Michigan taxpayers spent their money on this because . . .? I’m not sure. Skip this.



FOUR MARXES

img src=” http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/karlmarxmovies.jpg ” alt=”karlmarxmovies.jpg” width=”50″ height=”50″ / >

America's Astounding Destiny: Was It Foretold in the Bible?

An interesting article from www.gnmagazine.org about America's rise in the Holy Bible. This follows this post about America's debt crisis.  For a free magazine subscription or to get this book for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886-8632!

America's Astounding Destiny: Was It Foretold in the Bible?


The rise of the United States of America from British colony to superpower is an incredible story worth retelling. Equally incredible is the fact that the rise of the United States and the British Empire was foretold thousands of years ago.

by Melvin Rhodes

Few people can remember a time when the United States did not dominate the world. At the dawn of the 20th century the country had only just emerged on the world scene after victory in the Spanish-American War of 1898. Forty years later, on the eve of World War II, the nation's military strength still ranked below that of Portugal and Greece, its army the size of Romania's.



Today it is indisputably the world's greatest power. Ten years after the demise of its Cold War rival, the Soviet Union, the United States is the only superpower.



Power and influence are not measured only in terms of military capacity. American culture is pervasive. Movies made in Hollywood are dubbed into countless languages and shown all over the world. Television stations in Prague, Hong Kong, Kampala, Melbourne, Johannesburg, Barbados and just about everywhere else broadcast American television shows. In most of the world's capitals fast-food outlets sell America's favorite junk foods, often washed down by those symbols of American imperialism, Coca-Cola and Pepsi.



No matter what you might think of the United States, the world would be a much different place if it did not exist. Without the United States the world would have succumbed to one or other of the two despotic tyrannies that struggled for world dominance for several decades from the 1940s through the 1980s.



Fascism and communism both threatened the peace and security of the world during that span of 50 years. Victory for either would have meant the end of life as we know it. The basic freedoms many take for granted today would have been denied this generation and future generations had not these twin evil ideologies foundered on the strength of American resolve.



Yet few people 200 years ago could have imagined that America's position of global leadership would be the destiny of the fledgling republic.



How did America reach a point of global dominance? Is it possible that the United States was overlooked in the biblical prophecies about our time? Or was everything foretold a long time ago? What does the future have in store for the nation?



America might not have been

Some years ago America's noncommer cial Public Broadcasting System televised a series of documentaries on the American Revolution. The historians researching and presenting the series came to the interesting conclusion that the Revolution should not have happened. Others through the years have said the same.



Gordon Wood, a professor of history at Brown University, wrote in his 1991 book The Radicalism of the American Revolution: ". . . The social conditions that generically are supposed to be behind all revolutions— poverty and economic deprivation—were not present in colonial America. There should no longer be any doubt about it: the white American colonists were not an oppressed people; they had no crushing Imperial chains to throw off. In fact, the colonists knew they were freer, more equal, more prosperous, and less burdened with cumbersome feudal and monarchical restraints than any other part of mankind in the eighteenth century" (p. 4).



Modern American history goes back 400 years to the founding of the English-speaking colonies of Virginia and Massachusetts. Later other colonies were added, settled primarily by people from the British Isles. Americans before the Revolution saw themselves as Englishmen and were proud of their heritage.



"In the year 1775, when the War of Independence began, the thirteen colonies had a population of perhaps 2,418,000 people, of whom possibly one fifth were black. Small Dutch, German, and Swedish minorities were included in these statistics, but the vast majority of white inhabitants were of British stock" (Russell Kirk, America's British Culture, 1994, p. 69).



The land of the free

In the 18th century the English were the freest people on earth. Englishmen living in English colonies were even freer than their kin at home. They enjoyed freedom of the press, free right of assembly and freedom to trade without the restraints that governments placed on people in other nations. Each colony had its own parliament. Eighty to 90 percent of all free (nonslave) men could vote. By virtue of an act of the English Long Parliament (1640-42), before the English Civil War, they even had the right to bear arms, without which the American Revolution could never have started.



The colonies were also the home of religious diversity. The colonial governor of New York, Thomas Dongan, wrote in 1687: "Here bee not many of the Church of England; few Roman Catholicks; abundance of Quakers preachers . . . ; Singing Quakers, Ranting Quakers; Sabbatarians; Antisabbatarians; Some Anabaptists[;] some Independents; some Jews; in short[,] of all sorts of opinions there are some, and the most part [are] of none at all" (Jon Butler, Becoming America: The Revolution Before 1776, 2000, p. 185).



Religion had played a major role in the development of the American colonies. The first British colony at Jamestown, Virginia, was planted by Anglicans; the Pilgrims set- tled at Plymouth 13 years later; the Puritans arrived at Boston in 1630—while Calvinists spread elsewhere throughout New England. Catholics followed in Maryland in 1634 and Quakers in New Jersey and Pennsylvania in 1682. Baptists and Methodists came later.



With all these basic freedoms, why did the Revolutionary War take place? The answer is quite simple: in order that Bible prophecy should be fulfilled.



The outcome of the Revolutionary War was far from certain. Historian Thomas Fleming, in a chapter titled "Unlikely Victory: Thirteen Ways the Americans Could Have Lost the Revolution," states: "When a historian ponders the what ifs of the American Revolution, chills run up and down and around the cerebellum. There were almost too many moments when the patriot cause teetered on the brink of disaster, to be retrieved by the most unlikely accidents or coincidences . . ." (What If? The World's Foremost Military Historians Imagine What Might Have Been, Robert Crowley, editor, 1999, p. 157).



But the Bible prophesied that the American and British peoples would separate.



Ancient prophecies fulfilled in recent times

In the book of Genesis we read of a time when the descendants of the two sons of Joseph, the 11th son of Jacob (also known as Israel), would become "a multitude of nations" and a "great" single nation (Genesis 48:19). This prophecy was never fulfilled by the people who now live in the Middle Eastern nation of Israel, either in ancient times or recently.



At the beginning of Genesis 49 we read: "And Jacob called unto his sons, and said, 'Gather yourselves together, that I may tell you what shall befall you in the last days'" (verse 1, emphasis added throughout). This was not a prophecy to be fulfilled in ancient Israel, but by the descendants of Jacob "in the last days"—before the second coming of Jesus Christ and the establishment of the Kingdom of God.



(We might note here that many people erroneously assume that when the Bible mentions Israel it refers only to the Jewish people. Biblical and secular history, however, shows that this common belief is wrong. In fact, the first time the Bible uses the term Jews, in 2 Kings 16:6-7 in the King James Version, they are at war with the kingdom of Israel! The story is spelled out in greater detail in our free booklet The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy.)



Genesis 49 lists the strengths and weak- nesses of each of Jacob's sons. In verse 22 Jacob prophesies of his son Joseph's descendants: "Joseph is a fruitful bough, a fruitful bough by a well; his branches run over the wall." From Joseph's two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, were to come "a multitude of nations" and the "great" single nation that would be incredibly fruitful, industrious and productive, spreading out from their boundaries to other parts of the earth.



God had promised Jacob that his descendants would number "as the dust of the earth," spreading in all directions, and that "all the families of the earth" would be blessed through his offspring (Genesis 28:14). His descendants would also be blessed with great material and agricultural wealth and abundance and dominate other nations of the earth (Genesis 27:28-29).



Thousands of years were to pass before these prophecies would be fulfilled. Their fulfillment came in relatively recent times with the rise of the British Empire and Commonwealth, the "multitude of nations"; and the United States of America, the greatest single nation.



A separation prophesied

Until the 1770s the 13 American colonies were content to be a part of the British Empire. The colonists had recently fought alongside the mother country against France, winning a war that gave the English-speaking peoples domination of the eastern seaboard of North America. George Washington had fought in that war.



The British Empire was continuing to grow, with colonies and strategic sea gates around the world. Americans'security clearly lay within the empire, their freedoms protected by the Royal Navy and British armies. Each colony looked to the mother country rather than to neighboring colonies.



Then friction suddenly arose over taxation, the levies the British tried to raise to pay for the recent war against France. This discord rapidly escalated and led to the events of the Revolution and the eventual birth of the United States.



The events recorded in Genesis 48 show us that, for prophecy to be fulfilled, the United States had to separate from the British Empire. A distinction would eventually become apparent between the "multitude of nations" and the "great" single nation.



A rising empire

The British Empire, later to become the British Commonwealth, was then in its early stages. It would go on to encompass countries scattered around the globe. Some would be colonies ruled from London, represented locally by a British governor. Some would be protectorates, territories that in some cases had asked to be a part

of the empire and retained their own traditional leaders.



The Indian Empire, with its 320 million people, was to be the jewel in the imperial crown. The dominions of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa would become independent, sovereign nations, joined by the self-governing Colony of Southern Rhodesia. Altogether more than 60 countries around the world, each with its distinct culture and way of life, would form an empire upon which the sun never set.



These nations traded heavily among themselves. All benefited from considerable British investment. They enjoyed a common security backed up by the Royal Navy. But, above all, one institution united them—the British crown. Even the independent dominions, by their own choice, recognized the British monarch as their head of state.



For prophecy to be fulfilled America had to break away from this growing multitude of nations and sever its tie with the crown. There was no immediate demand for that drastic step when disputes arose between England and the colonists. The dispute was with the British government, not the king. The king was a constitutional monarch, seen as the guarantor of liberty against ambitious politicians, the symbol of unity for English-speaking peoples every- where regardless of their political affiliation.



Once the violence started, however, the bitterness between the belligerents grew so great that a total break—a severing of the tie with Great Britain and the crown—was inevitable.



John Adams, one of the leaders of the Revolution and America's second president, wrote to his wife,Abigail, on the day after Congress's approval of the Declaration of Independence: "It is the will of heaven that the two countries should be sundered forever" (William Federer, America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations, 1996, p. 9).



After the war George Washington discussed with Charles Thomson, secretary of the Continental Congress, the idea of writing their memoirs. Historian Thomas Fleming writes that "between them the two men probably knew more secrets than the entire Congress and Continental Army combined."



But the two men decided that their memoirs would be a bad idea. "It would be too disillusioning if the American people discovered how often the Glorious Cause came close to disaster. They jointly agreed that the real secret of America's final victory in the eight- year struggle could be summed up in two words: Divine Providence" (Fleming, p. 186).



Birth of the republic

Some Americans, aware that the English Republic of the 17th century and others before it did not last long before succumbing to dictatorships, still wanted a king. Some put forth the name of George Washington, leader of the Continental Army, which had defeated the British.



Here we should note America's biblical name, Manasseh, the great single nation (Genesis 48). Manasseh means "forget." Americans were to turn their backs on Europe, forgetting their past. They were to build themselves up into the world's greatest single nation, expanding westward, developing a wilderness into the most powerful economy in history.



Washington, America's first president, was to warn against "foreign entanglements," alliances that would have been inevitable if America had adopted a monarchical system of government. The children of monarchs marry the children of other kings to cement alliances. Had America adopted such a system, it would have looked backwards rather than to the future. But Washington had no heirs, making the possi- bility of a monarchy much more difficult.



The fledgling nation's form of government remained an issue. No republic in history had lasted long. At the end of the Constitutional Convention, when the delegates emerged from the meeting hall in Philadelphia, a leading lady of Washington society called out to Benjamin Franklin: "What is it to be, Mr. Franklin? A monarchy or a republic?" Was the United States to be a constitutional monarchy, or a republic— a nation without a king? His answer: "A republic, ma'am, if you can keep it."



Stability: Key to a nation's success

America had already had representative government in colonial times. Now the new nation was to step out and boldly attempt representative government without a king. Here George Washington's leadership was crucial. After two terms as president—a total of eight years—he voluntarily stepped aside, setting a precedent that contributed substan- tially to America's stability as a republic.



This was no minor accomplishment. Often other nations that have adopted republican forms of government have failed in arranging the peaceful transfer of power from one president to another. America's political stability, however, has been a key to its success. The United States, without a doubt, has been the most successful republic in history, the country Sir Winston Churchill would call "The Great Republic."



Political stability was essential for prophecy to be fulfilled. Without stability, the country could never have become the greatest single nation in history.



The nation's spiritual beginnings played a crucial role in its stability. The United States did not have one official religion as other nations had. Instead, virtually all people belonged to various churches that shared a high regard for the Bible. The United States was founded on Christian ideals by men who for the most part were strongly and deeply religious and convinced God was guiding the country.



Almost 40 years after the events that surrounded independence, John Adams wrote Thomas Jefferson that "the general principles, on which the Fathers achieved independence, were the only Principles in which that beautiful Assembly of Gentlemen could Unite . . . And what were these general Principles? I answer, the general Principles of Christianity, in which all these Sects were United: And the general Principles of English and American Liberty, in which all these young Men United, and which had United all Parties in America, in Majorities sufficient to assert and maintain her Independence" (Federer, p. 12).



Separation of church and state did not mean that the country was not to be a Christian nation, based on Christian principles and the Ten Commandments. Rather, it meant that no one church should enjoy a special status as was the case in England.



The oath of office, written by the founding fathers, states: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of the president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."



Washington, the first president to take the oath of office, spontaneously added, "I swear, so help me God," and kissed the Bible—a tradition that his successors have followed for more than two centuries. The sincere desire of America's founding fathers was that the republic would last. Built on Christian principles, with the Ten Commandments as its basic law, it would endure.



With a successful system of government in place,America was on course to fulfill its destiny as the greatest single nation in history.



In the next issue we will examine the astounding story of how the United States rose from newly independent former British colony to world superpower. GN





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Recommended Reading

Where does the United States of America appear in Bible prophecy? Does Bible prophecy neglect to mention major nations such as the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom? In fact, many prophecies do mention these nations. But, without an understanding of history and the Scriptures, few can identify them and understand what lies ahead for them. The publishers of The Good News have produced an astounding, eye-opening book, The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy.

President's Day Movie Rentals

Here are some interesting links from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed. Go ahead and click each year and make sure that you've seen these. This follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch!


Movies to Rent!!

Best of 2010

Best of 2009

Best of 2008

Best of 2007

Best of 2006

Best of 2005

House Overwhelmingly Votes to Scrap Planned Parenthood Funding

An interesting story from http://www.lifenews.com/  about the defunding of Planned Parenthood. This follows this post about the defunding of Obamacare and abortion in the House.  For more that you can do to get involved click  HERE and you can also get a very interesting book HERE!

House Overwhelmingly Votes to Scrap Planned Parenthood Funding


he House of Representatives today voted overwhelmingly to scrap funding for the Planned Parenthood abortion business and ensure it can’t receive any federal funds through any departments or programs. House members approved the Pence amendment on a 240-185 vote with 10 Democrats joining most Republicans to support de-funding the abortion business. Another 7 Republicans sided with almost all of the pro-abortion Democrats in the lower chamber in voting for the pro-abortion organization to receive taxpayer funds. (See below.)



Congressman Mike Pence of Indiana was the main sponsor of the amendment, which prevents federal funding of Planned Parenthood’s national organization and 102 named affiliates.



“This afternoon’s vote is a victory for taxpayers and a victory for life. By banning federal funding to Planned Parenthood, Congress has taken a stand for millions of Americans who believe their tax dollars should not be used to subsidize the largest abortion provider in America,” he said after the vote. “I commend my colleagues in both parties for taking a stand for taxpayers and a stand for life. I encourage my colleagues in the Senate to support this legislation and end federal funding of Planned Parenthood once and for all.”



The Pence Amendment does not affect the funding level for any federal program. Instead, it disqualifies PPFA and its named affiliates from receiving any type of federal funds. Though some Democrats claimed the amendment is unconstitutional, in a 2010 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected a claim that a similar law, cutting off federal funds for the organization ACORN and its affiliates, violated the Constitution’s Bill of Attainder Clause



The fight to stop Planned Parenthood funding is not over as the amendment is part of a continuing resolution bill needed to fund the federal government and the funding apparatus still faces Senate action and likely conference committee action — which could ultimately leave the amendment out of the final draft of the bill that goes to pro-abortion President Barack Obama. Full story at http://www.lifenews.com/

Visa Lottery Amendment Pulled From H.R. 1 Voting -- So We Need To Get Co-Sponsors For New Bill To End Lottery Permanently

An interesting post from http://www.numbersusa.com/ about the opportunity to put an immigration bill before the House. This follows this post about the latest on the Immigration Bills before the House of Representatives and this post which shows that there are 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso. On a related note, you can read about Miss Kentucky Latina here, an interesting article about Jessica Alba here or another article about Salma Hayek here. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

Visa Lottery Amendment Pulled From H.R. 1 Voting -- So We Need To Get Co-Sponsors For New Bill To End Lottery Permanently



We didn't get a vote on a one-year suspension on the visa lottery this week, despite all your thousands of phone calls. But we did get introduction of a new bill to permanently end the raffling off of 50,000 permanent work permits to foreign citizens each year regardless of their skills, education or whether any U.S. jobs need them.






Read the news story about the new bill. And send a fax to your U.S. Representative urging him/her to to start pushing this toward a House floor vote by co-sponsoring it.






Our NumbersUSA motto since we began in 1996 has been that we expect to lose some of the time but we always try to gain something while losing. And we always follow a setback with immediate action. Please take action now.






I regret to tell you that none of the immigration amendments on H.R. 1 (the big stop-gap spending bill) were allowed to come up for a vote. We had been promised by our contacts on the Hill that the amendments had been cleared by leadership and would get roll call votes.






I yelled a little bit at Rosemary Jenks (head of our Capitol Hill Team) when she first told me Friday that we were NOT going to get any votes (not that it was her fault). But I was so frustrated about all the work so many of you put into pushing these amendments. Now, we have no record of where these 435 Members of the House stand on these issues.






Rosemary tells me not to read too much into why House leaders could find time to have roll call votes on hundreds of amendments about other issues but not about immigration. Nonetheless, you can read some of my speculation in my Friday blog. If I'm right, the only way we are going to get votes on immigration is to double and re-double our pressure on the Members of Congress. Until the leaders of both Parties fear the voter power on this issue, they will keep punting on it.






So, did we gain anything from all your effort this week?






After discussing with my staff and thinking awhile, I have to conclude that all of your phoning and faxing this week really did advance the cause. Nearly a hundred new Members of Congress and their staffs discovered that immigration is a very hot issue that can keep the phones ringing. They have dozens of issues pressing on them. Most of the new Members are spending their first months in office trying to figure out how they can keep from taking stands on most issues. Your phone calls put them on notice that they won't be able to avoid showing their cards for very long.






It should be a lot easier to find co-sponsors for the new lottery bill now that every office has had so many phone calls from you explaining why the lottery is a terrible idea. Read my Wednesday blog for why the lottery and other immigration categories are so harmful to efforts to deal with the federal budget crisis.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Grading the Unfolding Fiasco in the House: The GOP In Danger of Flunking

A very interesting post from www.hughhewitt.com about the House Republicans FAILING on the budget. This follows this post about the Left's ability to organize in states like Wisconsin and what conservatives can do about it and and this article about  the recent news about ending the ban on offshore drilling which would encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran  and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!


Grading the Unfolding Fiasco in the House: The GOP In Danger of Flunking

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt




The House of Representatives appears close to flunking its first major test in the era of the deficit crisis. The emerging outline of the spending bill as described by Politico's David Rogers is a jumble of narratives, numbers and alleged reductions, but there is scant little in the way of "pelts on the wall" for the genuinely deficit-troubled as obvious black-hole boondoggles like Amtrack and the Legal Services Corporation are still being funded by billions borrowed on the backs of our children and grandchildren by an allegedly conservative House, and the big headline is that the National Endowment for the Arts is being cut by $22.5 million and the SEC is getting less money that it had hoped for.



This is the stuff of a conservative revolution and a new era of limits? Cutting NEA by what, a fourth or a third? (The NEA received $167 million in appropriations in 2010, but it is impossible to peg what baseline the $22.5 million is being deducted from at this point.) This is how the House GOP responds to the fiscal crisis on which they campaigned?



As I tried to explain to House Rules Chairman David Dreier yesterday, the GOP caucus has to win on two levels --with a significant rollback of overall spending, and with at least three significant defundings, trophies to put it bluntly, that mark the beginning of a new seriousness about the deficit, downpayments on the promises of the fall.



Not one Republican ran on a pledge to trim the budget of the NEA.



Not one ran on a CR of $1,087 trillion dollars. It is astonishing, really, how badly the new majority has bungled the messaging and the crucial need for speed.



Now it is in for an enormous shut-down fight with the Senate and the president over what? A billion here and a billion there? And they expect the Tea Party etc to rally to their banners? Unlike Wisconsin where Governor Scott Walker has agreed to battle the public employee unions over an enormous, culture changing set of laws, here the big shutdown battle will be over whether the NEA gets 70% of its budget or 100%. Amtrack's not on the table. LSC isn't either. Still no word on whether the round-heeled GOP chopped NPR and CPB to zero. The Pledge we were promised has become a paradigm of the new math loved by the left for so many years.



Fiasco. That is the word for it. I will spend most of today's program on this subject, and I hope I am wrong about the way I see it setting up, but the Beltway sharpies and message consultants convinced the new GOP leadership to play the wrong game for the wrong prize, and to do so with the MSM as the referees and the score-keepers.



Meanwhile Tim Pawlenty is headed to Phoenix and the gathering of the Tea Party Patriots, where all of the House leadership should be next weekend. But I doubt any of them will go. That would require a great deal more political courage than is on display in D.C. this week.



Bottom line: Why would anyone fight for the House GOP's version of the CR? Why would they get on a plane and go to D.C. to support Speaker Boehner in the negotiations with the Senate and the president? What's the elevator pitch to the public? "We are cutting the Arts Endowment by 22.5 million! Rally to our flag."



Astonishing.