Showing posts with label nma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nma. Show all posts

Friday, June 22, 2012

Stop EPA's Assault on Affordable Electricity

A very interesting post from http://actformining.org/ about the EPA's mining rules. This follows this post about natural petroleum  reserves in Alaska. This follows this post about the Keystone XL pipeline.  This follows this article about the recent news about ending the ban on offshore drilling which would encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read the very interesting book that is shown HERE!

Stop EPA's Assault on Affordable Electricity


Tell your Senators to Support S.J. Res 37



Join us in calling on Congress to stop the EPA from driving up the price of electricity through backdoor mandates. The EPA is piling on new regulations on Coal - America’s most abundant and affordable source of electricity. These regulations will cause household electricity bills to skyrocket.



With the price of gas reaching $5 a gallon, American's simply can't afford to have the cost of their household electricity being driven up by the misguided energy policies of the EPA.


http://actformining.org/national-actions/stopUMACT/


Ask your Senator to support S.J. Res. 37, which would prevent this misguided rule from increasing your electricity rates and dampen economic growth.

http://actformining.org/national-actions/stopUMACT/



Thursday, March 3, 2011

EPA'S REGULATORY TRAIN WRECK

An interesting post from www.nma.org about EPA regulations. This follows this post about domestic energy resources and jobs. This follows this previous post about the drilliling moratorium This follows this post  about a creative solution to Gulf drilling and this previous article about the recent news about the ban on offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more posts like this click here!

EPA'S REGULATORY TRAIN WRECK


What It Is, When It's Coming and What You Can Do To Stop It




With 14 million Americans out of work, our nation's extraordinary, domestic reserves of coal are more critical than ever before - especially as a source of abundant, low-cost electricity capable of powering and sustaining a robust, long-term recovery. Even at a time of great economic stress, EPA is poised to enact a series of back-door mandates that threaten millions of American jobs and increases the cost of every households electricity-rates. Collectively, it's called the EPA "Train Wreck" - and it's right around the bend. Together, we need to oppose these regulations and urge our representatives to do the same.



We encourage you to use our form below to send a message to your representatives and urge them to oppose regulations that would further hurt America's economy and eliminate high-paying mining jobs across the nation.

As part of this regulatory power grab by the EPA, the agency is proposing a combination of major regulations and policy rules hat will affect multiple business sectors across the country. Of particular concern to mining, the EPA is proposing:



Greenhouse Gas Rule (GHG) - Increase U.S. Energy Costs/Reduce Household income - average income dropping by more than $1,200 annually by 2030*



EPA has moved forward with greenhouse gas regulations under the Clean Air Act. On Jan. 2, the EPA implemented its GHG permitting program for certain sources that emit GHG's above a certain threshold. In 2011, EPA will roll out GHG performance standards for power plants and refineries, including coal-fired power plants. This power grab will give the EPA unprecedented ability to regulate America's economy. American mineral and metal producers, small and large manufacturers and businesses of every variety that rely on affordable electricity will suffer the consequences. *Dr. Roger Bezdek, "Potential Harm of Greenhouse Gas Control Regulations to Minorities, Low-income Persons, the Elderly, and Those Living on Fixed Incomes," September 2010



Transport Rule - Estimated Cost: $130 Billion by 2015*



In 2005, EPA finalized the Clean Air Interstate Rule aimed at reducing nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide emissions by 70 percent by 2025. Only six years later, EPA is poised to impose a new nationwide mandate that, according to an analysis by Bernstein Research, has the potential to severely impact nearly 20 percent of the nation's coal-based generation. *Metin Celebi, Frank Graves, "Potential Coal Plant Retirements under Emerging Environmental Regulations", The Brattle Group, December 8, 2010



Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Rule - Projected coal-plant closures as a result of rule: 30-70 GW*



EPA is slated to propose new standards requiring costly emissions controls, forcing coal units to install equipment that in some cases is prohibitively expensive, and other cases simply do not yet commercially exist. According to FBR Capital, the combination of the Transport and MACT rules could force the retirement of 30-70 GW of the lowest cost electricity generating capacity.



*Scott Disavino, "EPA regs may shut down 70,000MW of U.S. Coal Plants: FBR," Reuters, December 13, 2010



Ozone Rule - Estimated number of U.S. jobs lost: 7.3 million*

After imposing new rules lowering standards for ozone to 85 parts per billion (ppb) in 1997 and reducing that number again to 75 ppb in 2008, EPA has proposed new reductions to as low as 60 ppb. According to an analysis by the Congressional Research Service, moving the goalposts yet again would push 565 new U.S. counties into non-attainment status under the Clean Air Act.



*Unions for Jobs and the Environment, Comments on Proposed National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, March 22, 2010, (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0173;FRL-3102-1).



Coal Combustion Rule - As many of 350 coal-based facilities shuttered*



Cement, drywall, kitchen counters, even bowling balls - just some of the products that rely on recycled coal residuals as an essential component in their makeup. Such recycling activities could come under new threat if EPA re-categorizes these materials as "hazardous," costing as much as $75 billion over the next two decades according to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).



*Neil King Jr., and Rebecca Smith, "White House, EPA at Odds Over Coal-Waste Rules," Wall Street Journal, January 9, 2010



And Workers Agree: New Rules Result in Lost Middle-Class Jobs

According to a report from the United Mine Workers of America, job losses associated with the closure of EPA-targeted coal units could be significant, amounting to more than 50,000 direct jobs in the coal, utility and rail industries, and an indirect job loss figure exceeding 250,000. These are the regions expected to be hit the hardest.



Without your action, these back-door mandates could threaten the jobs of millions of Americans, impede America's economic growth and increase the cost of electricity for families and businesses across the nation.



Contact your Representive and make your voice heard!

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Oppose the Uranium Leasing Provision in Rahall’s “CLEAR ACT” (H.R. 3534)

An interesting post from www.nma.org about America's Uranium sources. This follows this post about the Coal Industry's struggles. This follows this post about a creative solution to Gulf drilling and this previous article about the recent news about the ban on offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more posts like this click here.

Oppose the Uranium Leasing Provision in Rahall’s “CLEAR ACT” (H.R. 3534)
Dear Friend:
The House National Resources Committee on July 14 will attempt to pass legislation introduced by Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) that will threaten our energy security.
Included in the Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources (CLEAR) Act is a provision to reclassify uranium - currently considered as a locatable mineral under the general mining laws - as leasable under the Mineral Leasing Act. For a more detailed overview of the legislation, click here.
Making uranium leasable not only negatively impacts the domestic uranium mining industry, but also the economy and national security of the United States.
The U.S. is already over 95 percent import-reliant on foreign sources of uranium. Moving uranium from a locatable mineral to a leasable one could deny access to some of the nation's richest deposits of uranium and dramatically weaken America's ability to produce affordable energy using abundant domestic resources.
This action will force America to increase its dependence on foreign sources of uranium by putting an end to growth of a viable domestic uranium mining industry, an industry that creates high paying jobs with good benefits and provides resources critical to meeting our nation's goals of decreasing our reliance on foreign sources of energy and reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.
We urge you to contact your Representative and urge them to oppose the so-called "CLEAR Act" (H.R. 3534). To find out the best way to get in touch with your representatives and voice your opposition to this legislation, visit our Action Center.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Help stop EPA from imposing job-destroying climate rules

A very interesting post from www.nma.org about EPA rule changes. This follows this post about drilling in the Gulf and this previous article about the recent news about offshore drilling to encourage American energy independence This is a key issue to prevent money from going to hostile countries such as Iran and Venezuela. For more posts like this click here.

Less than 24 hours until Senate vote--Help stop EPA from imposing job-destroying climate rules

In less than 24 hours the Senate will vote on a bipartisan resolution, introduced by Sens. Lisa Murkowksi (R-Alaska) and Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), which would block the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from unilaterally imposing massive new regulations on America's economy designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Already thousands of Americans worried about our nation's future economic prosperity have written their senators urging them to vote for the Murkowski-Lincoln resolution. If you haven't written already, it's not too late. Make your voice heard ahead of this important vote.
If EPA gets its way, American families will face huge hikes in their energy bills and American businesses will be buried under a mountain of new bureaucratic red tape.
But you can help. You can write your senators and urge them to support the Murkowski-Lincoln resolution by sending this letter.
You can also use our Social Capital tool to easily connect with your senators on Twitter and Facebook and let them know that you oppose EPA's plans to saddle America's economy with ineffective, expensive climate regulations. Simply select the "Stop EPA from Imposing Job Killing Climate Regulations" option from the issue drop down menu, then select your senator and choose how you want to contact them.
Act now and show your support for bipartisan, responsible, and effective solutions to our nation's most pressing energy and environmental challenges. Let the Senate know that allowing EPA to run amok is not the answer.
Thanks for your support.