Pro-Abortion Senate Democrat Leader Harry Reid Retiring, Flip-Flopped on Abortion

An interesting story from www.lifenews.com about Harry Reid. This follows this post about abortion and human trafficking. This follows this post about Loretta Lynch. For two very interesting books click HERE.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.

Pro-Abortion Senate Democrat Leader Harry Reid Retiring, Flip-Flopped on Abortion

National

Steven Ertelt       Washington, DC

• Total: 379
• 373
• 6

Share this story:

• Total: 379
• 373
• 6

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, an ardent abortion advocate, announced today that he is retiring from the Senate and will not seek re-election in 2016. His retirement paves the way for pro-life advocates to elect a pro-life replacement in Nevada, where his seat would be a competitive race.

 

Harry Reid started his career in Congress as a supposedly pro-life lawmaker — voting often for pro-life limits on abortion in the years following Roe v. Wade. But he flip-flopped as he ascended the ladder to Democratic Party leadership in the Senate and turned into a reliable abortion advocate who voted in favor of a statement supporting Roe v. Wade and the 57 million abortions on unborn babies that have resulted from the Supreme Court decision.
“I have had time to ponder and to think,” he said in a video released by his office, referring to his recent time off as a result of an injury. “We’ve got to be more concerned about the country, the Senate, the State of Nevada than us and as a result of that, I’m not going to run for reelection.”
CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!

“The decision they I’ve made has absolutely nothing to do with my injury, it has nothing to do with my being minority leader, and it certainly has nothing to do with my ability to be reelected, because the path to reelection is much easier than it probably has been any time that I’ve run for reelection,” he said.
The abortion advocate is clearly worried about republicans winning his Senate seat.
“We have to make sure that the Democrats take control of the Senate again. And I feel it is inappropriate for me to soak up all those resources on me when I could be devoting those resources to the caucus, and that’s what I intend to do,” he said in the video.
Reid’s retirement will pave the way for another abortion activists to lead Democrats in the Senate. Possible contenders for his leadership post include Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, Vice Chair of the Conference Sen. Chuck Schumer and Sen. Patty Murray, the Senate Democratic Conference Secretary. each of those Democrats are stridently pro-abortion.
For Reid’s seat, Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval is a possible Republicans and Democrats may include former Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto, and former Nevada Secretary of State Ross Miller.
Republicans have a sense that they could pickup the seat.

“On the verge of losing his own election and after losing the majority, Senator Harry Reid has decided to hang up his rusty spurs,” said NRSC Executive Director Ward Baker in a statement. “Not only does Reid instantly become irrelevant and a lame duck, his retirement signals that there is no hope for the Democrats to regain control of the Senate,” he added. “With the exception of Reid, every elected statewide official in Nevada is Republican and this race is the top pickup opportunity for the GOP.”
As LifeNews previously reported, pro-abortion Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid lost his position when pro-life candidates took over the U.S. Senate. This is very good for the pro-life movement because Reid has repeatedly supported pro-abortion President Barack Obama. He’s also refused to allow pro-life bills to come to a vote in the Senate.
Thomas Jefferson said that the care and protection of human life was the first order of business for any decent government, but Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid has a fundamentally different opinion of the pro-life bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks. He called it America’s “worst nightmare.”
In 2013, after the passage of the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R 1797) through the U.S House of Representatives, Reid said that we shouldn’t focus on “fringe issues” like late abortion. However, he failed to realize it is those who support late abortion that are on the most radical fringe of the pro-abortion movement.
Even Reid’s own Mormon bishop has taken him to task.
In November, Mark Peredes, a Mormon bishop, wrote in his blog, “Good Riddance to Harry Reid, the Mormon Senate Leader,” that his support of abortion rights runs contrary to church positions and are an “embarrassment”.
He elaborated, “Of all of yesterday’s election results, the one that made me dance a jig was the ousting of Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader. The Senate’s most powerful perch will no longer be occupied by a man who does not take his religion seriously.”

Share this story:

• Total: 379
• 373
• 6

Hold These Seven Senators to Their Word: Defund Amnesty in the DHS Bill

An interesting article from http://immigrationreform.com about Seven Democratic Senators who have stated they oppose Executive Amnesty before. This follows this post about the Senate and Executive Amnesty. This follows this post on HOW amnesty is funded in ways other than the DHS. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.

Hold These Seven Senators to Their Word: Defund Amnesty

By FAIR Gov't Relations Team 9 Comments

Did you know that after voters overwhelming rejected President Obama’s policies in the November elections, these Senate Democrats voiced opposition to executive amnesty? Indeed they did. Here’s what they said:

• Indiana, Senator Joe Donnelly – “I am as frustrated as anyone that Congress is not doing its job, but the president shouldn’t make such significant policy changes on his own.”
• Maine, Senator Angus King – “I also frankly am concerned about the constitutional separation of powers. You know, the Constitution says that the Congress makes the law and the president executes it. It’s a very clear division. The Framers knew what they were doing and it doesn’t say if the president gets frustrated and Congress doesn’t act, he gets to do, you know, what he thinks is important for the country.”
• Virginia, Senator Mark Warner – “big issue like immigration, the best way to get a comprehensive solution is to take this through the legislative process.”
• Missouri, Senator Claire McCaskill – “Our immigration system is broken, and I support a comprehensive plan to fix it, but executive orders aren’t the way to do it.” She continued, “I have to be honest, how this is coming about makes me uncomfortable, I think it probably makes most Missourians uncomfortable.”
• Montana, Senator Jon Tester –  ”I would prefer that Congress act, yes.”
• North Dakota, Senator Heidi Heitkamp – It’s Congress’ job to pass legislation and deal with issues of this magnitude.”
• West Virginia, Senator Joe Manchin – I disagree with the President’s decision to use executive action to make changes to our immigration system…” He continued, “I wish he wouldn’t do it.”

Unfortunately, now all of the Senators have changed their tune. Despite claiming to disagree with executive amnesty in November, just yesterday these Senators joined others in sending a letter to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell demanding that the Senate pass a “clean” Homeland Security funding bill, one that does not limit the President’s ability to exercise “prosecutorial discretion” in immigration matters. In reality, that means a bill that fully funds President Obama’s amnesty programs!
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has announced that he will bring the Homeland Security funding bill to the floor any day. There is no time to waste! Call your Senator’s office and tell him that there is no such thing as a “clean” funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security. Supporting President Obama’s executive amnesty is unacceptable, and that hard-working, taxpaying Americans deserve better than another amnesty and the dismantling of immigration enforcement!
Tell these Senators the people of your state deserve better. Tell them:

• You are disappointed that they signed the letter. You also remember that they voted for S. 744, the mass amnesty bill of 2013.
• There is no such thing as a “clean” DHS bill. He has a choice to fund the executive amnesty or to defund it;
• The President’s executive amnesty is an abuse of power; the Constitution gives Congress authority over immigration matters, not the Executive Branch;
• You expect the Senators to do more than voice disapproval of the executive amnesty; you expect them to vote to defund it!

Make your voice heard!
Contact your Senator’s office TODAY: Find Your Senators and Representatives by clicking here.

Editorial: Help defeat the TREASON Party. (Even if the only other option is the stupid party)

Editorial


Now that Labor Day has passed, many are focusing on the mid-term elections. Although the GOP may be the spineless and stupid party, it is the lesser of the two evils compared to the Treason Party. Therefore a Republican Senate will be at least an improvement on most every issue - abortion, foreign policy, definition of marriage, and possibly immigration.


If you are inclined, now is the time to give to key senate races to provide at least a check on the president for his last two years.  Here is a page for more info: http://www.hughhewitt.com/spend-150-senate-statehouses-homestretch-15-key-races-10/

Memo To House GOP: Stop Threatening Chances Of A Senate GOP Majority In 2014

A timely post about from www.hughhewitt.com about the House GOP's problems. This follows this post about a Coca Cola Super Bowl ad. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

Memo To House GOP: Stop Threatening Chances Of A Senate GOP Majority In 2014

posted by Hugh Hewitt

The week began with the Senate demonstrating that widespread opposition to the ill-conceived cut to the COLAs of career military would not last the year. It may not even survive the debt limit raise that is coming soon.  Even some of the staunchest, most stubborn defenders of the terrible breach of faith with 20 year veterans must have rethought their vote to put the military in their budget sites as the ovation rolled on and on for Sgt. 1st Class Cory Remsburg at Tuesday’s State of the Union.  His heroic, prolonged service was being applauded as well as his determination to recover from his injuries, but at least a few of the Members of Congress who had two weeks ago slashed at the pensions of men and women who have served multiple deployments like Remsburg must have thought to themselves: “Who am I going to encounter in my district that has been deployed ten times but who wasn’t injured and is instead just ticked at me for cutting their COLA and walking every precinct he or she can find?”
The House could send the Senate a debt limit with a repeal of the cut to the military COLA and a repeal of the hated medical device tax –70+ senators are pledged to both by most estimates– and sit back and see what Harry Reid does with the bill.  That would be good policy and great politics.
Terrible politics and even worse policy is an ill-conceived attempt at “enhanced border security” that omits specifications of a long, strong, double-sided,access-road border fence spanning half of the 2000 mile border with Mexico.  (Half of the border give or take a 100 miles is generally regarded as unpassable and suitable to non-fencing alternatives to security.)  Yet the “immigration pricnicples” introduced by House leadership at the House GOP Retreat yesterday ignited the ruinous debate without stating clearly that the fence the base wants will be a spelled-out “must-have” in any bill.  The completion of such a fence should be a trigger of the regularization, and the funds appropriated for it.  Everyone acknowledges that the deeply flawed Senate bill contained a head-fake on the fence, and that lack of seriousness left the bill with a deserved reputation as a charade.  The House leadership now wants its turn at playing at border security while avoiding the use of the “f-word.”
It is political insanity to begin the year with an assault on the career military and then to antagonize those Republican voters who, even as they support regularization of the nations vast population of illegals, want a visible, permanent obstacle to a new wave of illegal immigaration, not the promise of more Patrol Patrol that can be redeployed by executive order or drone patrols that can be grounded by the same.  A fenc cannot be turned off.  The double-sded fences accompanied by access roads cost money but do work. They work in San Diego and other areas where they have been built, and the House GOP leadership’s head-scraching refusal to bluntly get behind a fence has to be because that leadership doesn’t support a fence.
Which is one of the reasons why more than a majority of the caucus is opposed to doing anything on immigration in 2014.  Rich Lowry estimated yesterday that one third of the House favors moving the first of many “piecemeal” bills, one-thrid opposes anything, and one third urges a delay until 2015 after the Senate is strengthened by at least a few new GOP members if not an outright majority.
I began 2013 hoping that a good bill would emerge from the Senate and was of course disappointed.  I then hoped a fence bill would emerge from Chairman Mike Mccaul’s Homeland Security committee, and was again disappointed.  (Here’s the transcript of my interview with Chairman McCaul on the subject from July 18 of last summer.)
Now the best option open to the GOP is “masterly inactivity” on immigration and a redoubled focus on the many horros of Obamacare, and somehow the House GOP allows this sort of story to emerge from its “unity-building” retreat.
Cutting the retorement pay of career military and pushing doomed immigration bills that lack even the most basic of gestures to the base is exactly what comes from an isolated, Beltway-centric House GOP leadership.  If as is rumored, Congressman Jeb Hensarling and/or Congressman Tom Price challenge the established order for leadership in the next Congress at the organizing meeting of the incoming Congress in November after the elections, the events of the past three weeks will guide many votes.
The Washington Examiner’s David Drucker has the details of how “House Republicans spent a considerable portion of the first day of the event discussing immigration reform and debating whether they should move on it or delay action until after the November elections.”
Now members will get to hear from their districts about slamming the career military and refusing to build the fence, which is the twin accomplishments of the launch of the new year by the House GOP.  ”Nicely played Mr. Bond” doesn’t come to mind.
 

Act now to stop blasphemy law death penalty

A very interesting post from www.releaseinternational.org about the blasphemy law in Pakistan being used against non-Muslims. This follows this post about Chris Christie's policy towards Islamic terrorists. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more about what you can do to get more involved click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE.




Act now to stop blasphemy law death penalty

Last month the constitutional Federal Sharia Court in Pakistan, in regards to the blasphemy laws, ordered the government in Islamabad to implement death as the only penalty for someone found guilty of blasphemy. It has been thought that the government would not accept this order but would appeal against it. However, there appears to have been only silence from the government and so concern has been expressed that the 60-day time limit to accept or appeal against this order will soon pass with the result that the order will proceed unchallenged.

Christians and other religious minorities in Pakistan will be deeply concerned that the blasphemy law will become a Sharia law and that cases will start to be heard in Sharia courts. The current blasphemy laws, which even Pakistani politicians have admitted have been misused to settle personal scores, will become even more open to abuse and the accused will become even more defenseless and vulnerable.

It is also feared that a climate of intolerance created by a move towards cases being heard by religious courts will lead to more incidents of public retribution and vigilante killings as justice moves increasingly into the hands of clerics and away from the state judicial system.

Please write to your Representative now expressing your concern about this situation and asking them to take up the matter with the Secretary of State, Secretary John Kerry, as a matter of urgency. You can do this simply by using the text in the three paragraphs above and adding your name and address.

Click here to find an email and postal address for your local Representative.

Thank you for speaking up on behalf of your Christian brothers and sisters in Pakistan. Please forward this News Update email to your contacts so that they too can take action. 

They're back home - will you contact them?

An interesting story from http://www.sba-list.org  about contacting your Senators on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. This follows this post about the Girl Scouts abortion advocacy. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can also get two very interesting books HERE.


They're back home - will you contact them?


Tomorrow marks the tragic 41^st anniversary of Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion through all nine months of pregnancy and has resulted in the loss of over 50 million innocent lives.
Here in Washington, hundreds of thousands of pro-life Americans will march from the Capitol to the Supreme Court in the 20-degree cold to speak up for those who have no voice, and demand action from our elected representatives – I can’t wait to march with them!

But I also know that not all pro-life Americans can attend the March for Life here in DC, and many are wondering what they  can do to make an impact.

If you cannot attend the march, you’ve got an incredible opportunity to influence your U.S. Senators, who are back home in their respective states this week.

You see, our pro-life champions in the U.S. Senate have introduced legislation – the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act – that would protect unborn babies beginning at 20 weeks, or roughly halfway through pregnancy. This historic legislation has already passed the U.S. House.
Already, this bill is up to 40 co-sponsors – but we need even more to force a vote on this legislation, and get every single U.S. Senator on record.
With Senators on recess and back in their respective states this week, they need to hear from YOU, especially during the anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
The very first thing you need to do is find out whether or not your two U.S. Senators are co-sponsoring the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act: You can check where your two Senators stand by clicking here.
If they are co-sponsoring, they need to hear your praise. And if they are not, you need to ask them to become co-sponsors.
Here are four simple ways you can influence your two Senators on this important legislation:

1. Visit the local offices of your two Senators. Set up an appointment, or just drop by to express your support for this bill. Click here to find your Senators’ district offices.
2. Call the local offices of your two Senators. Tell them to advance the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. Click here for phone numbers and talking points.  
3. If you don’t have time to visit or call your two Senators, send them an email. Click here to send e-mails to your two Senators. Please keep in mind that visiting your Senators’ offices or calling has a higher impact than this option.
4. Tweet your two Senators. Click here to find their Twitter handles, and sample tweets.
   

Remember, your two Senators are back home this week. This is a unique opportunity for them to hear from you during the anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
Once you’ve taken action, don’t forget to forward this email to all of your pro-life family and friends so they can take action too.


For Life,




Marjorie Dannenfelser
President, Susan B. Anthony List

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the blessing of free enterprise. This follows this post about fighting in Sri Lanka. For a free magazine subscription or to get the book shown for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

Freedom and Free Enterprise - Great Biblical Blessings

article by Don Hooser

Few people understand how much the wonderful principles of civil liberty and free enterprise originated with God and are taught in the Bible!

Source: Photos.com

Freedom—Liberty—How sweet the sound! From the beginning of time, humanity has been "yearning to breathe free."
The greatest freedoms are spiritual, but physical, civil and economic freedoms are also important. They often overlap.
Freedom is a major theme in the Bible. In fact, the Bible has inspired people down through the ages to seek freedom for

themselves and others.
However, many people tend to take their freedoms for granted and undervalue them. They don't understand how much God wants us to cherish and protect them.
Many hold misunderstandings about the Bible. Wasn't the God of the Old Testament a severely controlling dictator? Weren't His laws a "yoke of bondage"? Weren't the Israelites poor nomads who had no personal property?
To those questions, the answer is no. God's way is that of liberty, including free exchange of goods and services, within law.

Are human beings born free?

"God created man in His own image" (Genesis 1:27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
See All...). This made man vastly superior to all the other creatures!
God said mankind was to "be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion [rule or stewardship]" over all the other creatures (verse 28). And God told Adam "to tend and keep" the Garden of Eden, implying that his descendants should tend and keep the planet (Genesis 2:15And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
See All...).
Notice what God did not say: He did not specify innumerable details about how they should do it (although He clearly holds us accountable to obey His laws that are to govern our actions).
This immediately shows God's confidence in the abilities of human beings in general to learn—from their own experience and the experience of others—how to manage their occupations without rigid control by some central government.
Human beings are born free because we have been given amazing minds with which to think, learn, speak, imagine, make decisions, set goals, develop tools, invent, be entrepreneurs, be creative and artistic, develop personality, love and worship. (Other physical creatures, however, are not born free—they are ruled mainly by their instincts.)
Human government can restrict your freedom, but it can't give you freedoms because you already have them.
Freedom of choice is clearly taught in the Bible. God defines good and evil and announces rewards and punishments according to our behavior. But God leaves people free to choose between the options (Deuteronomy 30:19I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:
See All...).

Do laws provide freedom or deprive people of freedom?

When man's laws are overly complex, overly restrictive and excessive in number, they largely deprive people of precious freedom. However, God's laws, which are perfect and few in number, provide for maximum liberty overall.
God, of course, does not grant absolute freedom, which would mean anarchy and license to do evil! Laws are needed to constrain people from intruding on the freedoms of others.
So the Ten Commandments are the opposite of a "yoke of bondage"! James calls them the perfect "law of liberty" (James 1:25But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
See All...; 2:12, emphasis added throughout).
The Ten Commandments have been criticized for sounding negative—most saying, "You shall not . . ." But that kind of law is exactly what a nation needs—laws that restrain evil and harm to others but don't restrict free enterprise and honest business!
Free enterprise is also called private enterprise. Here's a brief dictionary definition: "Business activities unregulated by state ownership or control." It is the opposite of socialism. Today, many nations have "mixed" economies—partly free enterprise and partly socialistic.
Perhaps the most famous exponent in the 20th century of free-market economics was the Austrian-American genius Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973), author of a monumental work titled Human Action: A Treatise on Economics.
Probably the best recently published book about the science of economics is by Dr. Shawn Ritenour, an adjunct professor with the Ludwig von Mises Institute. In his 545-page book Foundations of Economics: A Christian View (2010), he explains how the many laws of economics are based on the teachings of the Bible. Two excellent shorter books are Biblical Economics by R.C. Sproul, Jr. (2008) and Money, Greed, and God by Jay Richards (2009).

Scripture teaches the importance of private property

God, of course, owns the world (Psalm 50:12If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof.
See All...). But Psalm 115:16The heaven, even the heavens, are the LORD's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.
See All... tells us, "The earth He has given to the children of men." This implies God's desire for each family to "own" a piece of property—essentially a long-term lease of God's property.
The protection of the Eighth Commandment—"You shall not steal"—shows the importance God places on private property. The Tenth Commandment—"You shall not covet"—tells us to not even think about stealing (Exodus 20:15Thou shalt not steal.
See All..., 17).
Stealing, of course, takes many forms. God's Word mandates that all measurements and standards remain accurate, consistent and unchanging to prevent the cheating of customers (Leviticus 19:35-36 [35] Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure.
[36] Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin, shall ye have: I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt.

See All...). It forbids cheating or defrauding others (verse 13). It prohibits moving markers that define the boundaries of one's land and lying in any matter of law (Deuteronomy 19:14-20 [14] Thou shalt not remove thy neighbour's landmark, which they of old time have set in thine inheritance, which thou shalt inherit in the land that the LORD thy God giveth thee to possess it.
[15] One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
[16] If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;
[17] Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days;
[18] And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother;
[19] Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.
[20] And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you.

See All...).
All of these, and many other laws, were designed to protect the people and their property.
Just think: If a person has at least a small piece of land that is debt-free and tax-free, he can at least put up a tent, plant a garden and get by with relatively little income. It may also provide an opportunity for a profitable farm or cottage industry.
A beautiful prophecy about life on earth after Christ returns is that "everyone shall sit under his vine and under his fig tree, and no one shall make them afraid" (Micah 4:4But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid: for the mouth of the LORD of hosts hath spoken it.
See All...). When it's "his vine" and "his fig tree," that means they are on his land!

Material wealth and Jesus' promotion of investment

The Bible does not say that "money is the root of all evil," as some assume. It says, "The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil" (1 Timothy 6:10For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
See All...). We must love God and spiritual riches far more than physical riches.
The Bible warns against the two opposite evils of materialism and asceticism. The apostle Paul wrote that God "gives us richly all things to enjoy" (1 Timothy 6:17Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy;
See All...).
We are certainly to focus on helping others. But earning money and building wealth for ourselves puts us in a position to be of help to others—rather than burdening others with our need (though some must rely on others' generosity of course). A number of godly men in the Bible were wealthy (such as Abraham, Job and David), but they put God ahead of their wealth.
Many of Jesus' parables were stories about money and business transactions. Although His main point was always spiritual, He would not have been using financial transactions as illustrations if they were inherently evil.
For example, in the parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14-30 [14] For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods.
[15] And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to every man according to his several ability; and straightway took his journey.
[16] Then he that had received the five talents went and traded with the same, and made them other five talents.
[17] And likewise he that had received two, he also gained other two.
[18] But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord's money.
[19] After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them.
[20] And so he that had received five talents came and brought other five talents, saying, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents: behold, I have gained beside them five talents more.
[21] His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.
[22] He also that had received two talents came and said, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents: behold, I have gained two other talents beside them.
[23] His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.
[24] Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed:
[25] And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine.
[26] His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed:
[27] Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury.
[28] Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents.
[29] For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.
[30] And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

See All...) and in the parable of the minas (Luke 19:12-27 [12] He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.
[13] And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.
[14] But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.
[15] And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.
[16] Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.
[17] And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.
[18] And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.
[19] And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities.
[20] And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin:
[21] For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.
[22] And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:
[23] Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?
[24] And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.
[25] (And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)
[26] For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.
[27] But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

See All...), the master expected his servants to use his money to generate a profit without telling them how or where to invest it (except that, at the end, he said that those who produced no profit should have at least deposited his money in the bank to earn interest). The servants who invested and produced a profit are praised and rewarded by the master.
The Bible praises initiative, diligence and the work ethic as wise efforts to "bear fruit" and prosper (Proverbs 10:4He becometh poor that dealeth with a slack hand: but the hand of the diligent maketh rich.
See All...; 12:24; 13:4; 18:9; 21:5; 22:29; 24:27). And if our faith is in God rather than in ourselves, God will make sure our needs are provided (Matthew 6:33But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
See All...).

A bum rap for capitalism

But haven't we heard bad things about "capitalism"? Capitalism, which is largely synonymous with free enterprise and free exchange, has been unfairly criticized. "Capital" refers to money, property, tools and other assets. And capitalism simply means the use of capital to produce goods or services that are "in demand," meaning things that are needed or desired by others. The scriptures cited above clearly support the idea of capitalism.
Many of the problems associated with so-called capitalist economies are not due to free enterprise but to criminal activity and government interference in markets (so that they are not truly free markets). Backroom dealing between certain corporations and government regulators is such an example.
Historically and generally, the fruit of free enterprise has been prosperity while the fruit of socialism (and communism) has been poverty and misery. Nevertheless, there continue to be dreamers (often with good intentions) who naively think their new variations of socialism will work wonderfully.
Yet socialism is based on the false premise that there is a fixed amount of wealth that must be redistributed for everyone to get an equitable share or "piece of the pie." This redistribution requires coerced taking from those with a bigger piece, which is in fact theft. Capitalism, on the other hand, provides a godly solution. Rather than redividing the pie, we can make more pies!
Indeed, free enterprise is the only system that allows more wealth to be generated rather than just moving around what people presently possess.
And free enterprise promotes liberty, being largely based on the principle of laissez-faire, French for "Let (people) do (as they choose)." Laizzez-faire, sometimes paraphrased as "hands off," was first clearly explained and advocated by the Scottish economist Adam Smith (1723-1790) in his great work The Wealth of Nations, published in 1776.

He described how free societies run smoothly without government controls as if an "invisible hand" is guiding them. This is the most efficient economic model for meeting people's wants and needs. Smith is considered "the prophet of free enterprise," but the main principles he encouraged have been in the Bible all along. (Regarding a common misconception, see "The Early Church Was Not Communist—and Neither Was Jesus".)

What is the proper role for civil governments?

Paul wrote that God has ordained civil government to prevent and punish "evil" (Romans 13:1-4 [1] Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
[2] Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
[3] For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
[4] For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

See All...). Peter wrote that civil "governors . . . are sent by [God] for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of those who do good" (1 Peter 2:14Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.
See All...).
The powers of federal, state and local governments should largely be limited to protecting the three great natural rights—life, liberty and property—from threats from within (crime) and from threats from without (invasion). In addition, it should protect the people from the government itself.
The word "republic" implies not only a representative form of government, but one that deals with public affairs as opposed to manipulating and micromanaging private affairs. It should not be the business of government to involve itself in private business unless that business is causing harm to others.

Consider the freedoms enjoyed in God's nation of Israel

For a long while after its establishment, the new nation of Israel was a theocracy with God as its King (compare 1 Samuel 12:12And when ye saw that Nahash the king of the children of Ammon came against you, ye said unto me, Nay; but a king shall reign over us: when the LORD your God was your king.
See All...). In the Promised Land the people enjoyed the most personal liberties of any nation in the history of the world.
God gave His nation a marvelous start! Moses told them that God had promised "to give you large and beautiful cities which you did not build, houses full of all good things, which you did not fill, hewn-out wells which you did not dig, vineyards and olive trees which you did not plant" (Deuteronomy 6:10-11 [10] And it shall be, when the LORD thy God shall have brought thee into the land which he sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give thee great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not,
[11] And houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells digged, which thou diggedst not, vineyards and olive trees, which thou plantedst not; when thou shalt have eaten and be full;

See All...). Essentially, they received an inheritance that was all debt-free and tax-free!
As long as the people of Israel looked to God as their King, the laws didn't change. But when Samuel was the prophet and judge in Israel, the people began to insist on a human ruler "to judge us like the [other] nations" (1 Samuel 8:5And said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations.
See All...).
Eventually God let them learn some lessons the hard way. He told Samuel to "heed their voice," but also to "solemnly forewarn them, and show them the behavior of the king who will reign over them" (1 Samuel 8:9Now therefore hearken unto their voice: howbeit yet protest solemnly unto them, and shew them the manner of the king that shall reign over them.
See All...). So Samuel forewarned them that they would see their young men and women drafted into military and government service and that they would see government confiscation of property, high taxes and other losses of their liberties (verses 10-18).
What God prophesied came to pass—over and over. As God warned, "You will cry out in that day because of your king whom you have chosen for yourselves, and the Lord will not hear you in that day" (verse 18). What an appropriate description of our day as well!

A surprising key to the American success story

Henry Grady Weaver wrote a fascinating history and analysis of freedom and its benefits titled The Mainspring of Human Progress (1947).
Weaver described the greatest "revolution against pagan fatalism, the revolution for human freedom"—the birth of the United States. For nearly 6,000 years, progress in science and people's standard of living proceeded very slowly. Then once the American colonies became the "land of the free," there was an immediate outburst of human energy and innovation followed by prosperity.
The success of the American experiment has inspired many other nations to learn and apply valuable lessons.
What did the motley colonists have in common that unified and energized them?
It was not formal education. It was the fact that a large percentage of them were readers, and they mostly were reading the same books, including books about history and economics!
Some of the popular books were by English philosopher John Locke (1632-1704), French scholar Baron Charles de Montesquieu (1689-1755), French writer Voltaire (1694-1778), Geneva-born writer Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), and English judge and professor Sir William Blackstone. Most of these Enlightenment thinkers were strong proponents of the Christian religion.
However, the most popular book by far was the Bible. In fact, the main reason they were highly motivated to learn to read and to teach their children to read was so they could read the Good Book!
The widespread self-education in noble books with great ideas, especially the Bible, explains why most of the colonists were people of principle and high moral character. They knew that, to a great extent, you become what you read.
The American colonists were in many respects a powerful illustration of Jesus' statement, "You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
See All...).
The Bible makes it clear that God deserves all the credit for making America "a great nation" (Genesis 12:2And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
See All...). But some of the ideas and ideologies that God inspired in the American colonists contributed to the achievement of that greatness.

True economic freedom is yet to come

Of course, for all its greatness, the United States has periodically suffered economic woes—and matters have grown far worse as the government has grown in power. Much of what is represented as free enterprise really isn't.
Governments frequently offer financial favors, but with strings attached. With every government handout (money from taxes, or the cruel and hidden tax of monetary inflation) comes more regulations and restrictions of civil liberties.
Democracies usually eventually destroy themselves because voters are seduced by promises of short-range benefits paid for by someone else. They sacrifice liberties for perks and promises of security. They vote for the political candidates who promise them the most, with the result that government spending and taxes increase, sapping the productivity of the economy and weakening the nation until it falls to forces without or collapses from decay within.
Sadly, we read in the headlines of this erosion of economic vitality and liberty taking place now in the United States and other democratic nations.
As we've seen, the Bible indeed teaches free enterprise. But the fact is that the world has never seen free enterprise at its very best. That will happen only after Jesus Christ returns! He will give the world ideal economics combined with godly ethics. The results will be spectacular—liberty, peace and prosperity throughout the world!
The people and their children and all their descendants will enjoy every kind of wonderful blessing—as indicated in the following passage:
"They shall build houses and inhabit them; they shall plant vineyards and eat their fruit. They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for as the days of a tree [many days!], so shall be the days of My people, and My elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands. They shall not labor in vain, nor bring forth children for trouble; for they shall be the descendants of the blessed of the Lord, and their offspring with them" (Isaiah 65:21-23 [21] And they shall build houses, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and eat the fruit of them.
[22] They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.
[23] They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the LORD, and their offspring with them.

See All...).
The Bible makes it clear that free enterprise is the best economic system. When people combine free enterprise with faith in God and obedience to His spiritual laws, they not only survive, they thrive.