Showing posts with label Joe Donnelly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Donnelly. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Hold These Seven Senators to Their Word: Defund Amnesty in the DHS Bill

An interesting article from http://immigrationreform.com about Seven Democratic Senators who have stated they oppose Executive Amnesty before. This follows this post about the Senate and Executive Amnesty. This follows this post on HOW amnesty is funded in ways other than the DHS. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.


Hold These Seven Senators to Their Word: Defund Amnesty

FAIR Action AlertDid you know that after voters overwhelming rejected President Obama’s policies in the November elections, these Senate Democrats voiced opposition to executive amnesty? Indeed they did. Here’s what they said:
  • Indiana, Senator Joe Donnelly – “I am as frustrated as anyone that Congress is not doing its job, but the president shouldn’t make such significant policy changes on his own.”
  • Maine, Senator Angus King – “I also frankly am concerned about the constitutional separation of powers. You know, the Constitution says that the Congress makes the law and the president executes it. It’s a very clear division. The Framers knew what they were doing and it doesn’t say if the president gets frustrated and Congress doesn’t act, he gets to do, you know, what he thinks is important for the country.”
  • Virginia, Senator Mark Warner – “big issue like immigration, the best way to get a comprehensive solution is to take this through the legislative process.”
  • Missouri, Senator Claire McCaskill – “Our immigration system is broken, and I support a comprehensive plan to fix it, but executive orders aren’t the way to do it.” She continued, “I have to be honest, how this is coming about makes me uncomfortable, I think it probably makes most Missourians uncomfortable.”
  • Montana, Senator Jon Tester –  ”I would prefer that Congress act, yes.”
  • North Dakota, Senator Heidi Heitkamp – It’s Congress’ job to pass legislation and deal with issues of this magnitude.”
  • West Virginia, Senator Joe Manchin – I disagree with the President’s decision to use executive action to make changes to our immigration system…” He continued, “I wish he wouldn’t do it.”
Unfortunately, now all of the Senators have changed their tune. Despite claiming to disagree with executive amnesty in November, just yesterday these Senators joined others in sending a letter to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell demanding that the Senate pass a “clean” Homeland Security funding bill, one that does not limit the President’s ability to exercise “prosecutorial discretion” in immigration matters. In reality, that means a bill that fully funds President Obama’s amnesty programs!
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has announced that he will bring the Homeland Security funding bill to the floor any day. There is no time to waste! Call your Senator’s office and tell him that there is no such thing as a “clean” funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security. Supporting President Obama’s executive amnesty is unacceptable, and that hard-working, taxpaying Americans deserve better than another amnesty and the dismantling of immigration enforcement!
Tell these Senators the people of your state deserve better. Tell them:
  • You are disappointed that they signed the letter. You also remember that they voted for S. 744, the mass amnesty bill of 2013.
  • There is no such thing as a “clean” DHS bill. He has a choice to fund the executive amnesty or to defund it;
  • The President’s executive amnesty is an abuse of power; the Constitution gives Congress authority over immigration matters, not the Executive Branch;
  • You expect the Senators to do more than voice disapproval of the executive amnesty; you expect them to vote to defund it!
Make your voice heard!
Contact your Senator’s office TODAY: Find Your Senators and Representatives by clicking here.


Thursday, May 10, 2012

Call & Ask your U.S. Rep. to Support Local Immigration Enforcement‏

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com about immigration enforcement. This follows this post about Indiana's improvement in Senatorial representation. This follows this post about three primaries on May 8. This follows this post about Marco Rubio's DREAM Act. This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

Call & Ask your U.S. Rep. to Support Local Immigration Enforcement‏


Ask your U.S. Rep. to Support Local Immigration Enforcement


This new phone call request has been posted in your Action Buffet based on your answers to the Interest Survey.



You can find this phone call request by proceeding to

http://www.numbersusa.com/phones?ID=13981





This week, the House of Representatives is considering H.R. 5326, the Commerce, Justice, and Science (CSJ) Appropriations Act for FY2013. During this process, amendments to this bill will be considered and one of these amendments will be amendment number #59, filed by Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC). The amendment "defunds the lawsuit that DOJ is waging against SC and refuses to allow the Obama Administration to politicize an issue instead of seeking to govern responsibly."







Please call your U.S. Representative and urge him/her to support the Duncan amendment, number 59, to the Commerce and Justice Appropriations Act when it is voted on. This amendment is important because it would prevent the Justice Department from continuing its lawsuit against South Carolina's immigration enforcement law.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Indiana boots worst immigration Republican in Senate‏

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com about Indiana's improvement in Senatorial representation. This follows this post about three primaries on May 8. This follows this post about Marco Rubio's DREAM Act. This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants such as the 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso, where President Barack Obama recently bashed immigration enforcement! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

Indiana boots worst immigration Republican in Senate‏

Indiana election guarantees one major immigration improvement in 2013 U.S. Senate










ACTION 1 -- Join the conversation about this at: https://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/may-8-2012/defeated-sen-lugar-worst-immigration-republican-senate-both-gop-dem-indian





Defeated Sen. Lugar nearly always preferred more immigrant workers over helping unemployed Americans





Voters in Indiana today provided another one of those historic shifts in the immigration battles that I have to share with all of you.





Sen. Lugar is one of the last hold-overs of the Republican Senators who not only tried to push through all the Bush amnesties at the beginning of this century but also back in the 1990s helped kill the immigration enforcement and green card reductions recommended by the bi-partisan Barbara Jordan Commission.





No matter which Party wins in November, the Indiana Senate seat now held by Richard Lugar should produce far better immigration actions in the future.







Democrat primary winner Joe Donnelly has a B+ Career immigration grade in the U.S. House.







And the GOP primary victor, Richard Mourdock, filled out the NumbersUSA survey to earn the title of TRUE REFORMER, supporting all 12 of our immigration stances.







In addition, the Libertarian primary victor, Andrew Horning, filled out our survey and looks almost as good as Donnelly on immigration.





Finally, the workers of Indiana -- and the country -- will have a U.S. Senator from Indiana who cares about their interests when it comes to immigration.





NumbersUSA has been sending out tens of thousands of emails to Indiana voters offering comparisons of all the Senate candidates on immigration.





LUGAR IMMIGRATION RECORD PRIME EXAMPLE OF OUT-OF-TOUCH LABEL THAT SANK HIM





Like many Senators who serve for many terms, Sen. Lugar was vulnerable to charges that he no longer had a good feel for the needs of his state's voters. The fact that his greatest reputation is in foreign policy didn't help.





His immigration actions accentuated both those identities because he used immigration as a kind of bargaining chit in his foreign policy gamemanship. The effect on U.S. workers didn't seem to ever come into play.





Indiana Secretary of State Mourdock challenged Lugar in part because of his constant leadership in pushing for amnesties for illegal aliens who have illegally stolen U.S. jobs.





At the time, I issued this statement:





"Sen. Lugar has always seemed to me to be a serious statesman, but that quality has always been missing in his blind eye to the suffering that his immigration policies cause the most vulnerable Americans, as well as the deterioration to the quality of life of ordinary citizens."





Sen. Lugar never met an amnesty he didn't like, voting for amnesties 15 times.





HOW MUCH DID LUGAR HURT UNEMPLOYED AMERICANS? LET ME COUNT THE WAYS





We rated Sen. Lugar on 85 immigration actions since 1989.





When each action was weighted according to the numerical impact, we found that he acted 81% of the time in favor of foreign workers and dependents over the interests of U.S. workers and dependents.





That earned him a D-minus over his career, making him the worst Republican in the Senate (Sen. John McCain of Arizona is runner-up).







He acted 84% of the time in favor of the Chain Migration of extended family of immigrants over the interests of U.S. workers.







He acted 100% of the time in favor of foreign workers brought in through a random lottery.







He acted 98% of the time for amnesty enticements and 76% of the time for other rewards for illegal aliens.







And in 30 votes and co-sponsorships that were about direct importation of workers, he acted more than 99% of the time for more immigrant competition for U.S. workers.





He did give tepid support to secure borders (C+) and interior enforcement (C) but tried to kill a pilot E-Verify program to keep illegal aliens from getting jobs back in 1996.





ACTION 2 -- Check out the immigration comparisons of candidates running for Congress in your District and in your state. If information is missing, follow the instructions to contact the campaigns to press for positions that can be added to our Comparison Pages:





https://www.numbersusa.com/content/elections/races/congressional





It is so important that voters know where each candidate stands on immigration issues before heading into the polling booth.





ROY

BECK