Showing posts with label South Carolina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label South Carolina. Show all posts

Friday, October 7, 2016

Did Jesus Christ Foretell Devastating Storms?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about prophetic hurricanes. This follows this post about the Day of Atonement. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

In Matthew 24:7-8, Jesus Christ foretold signs that would mark the time leading up to His return: “For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in various places …”
We have certainly seen devastating earthquakes in recent years. The December 2004 earthquake off Indonesia was the most powerful in decades, unleashing a massive tsunami that took some 300,000 lives. Less than a year later, an earthquake in southern Asia killed another 30,000.
In Matthew 24:7, the Greek word translated “earthquakes” is seismos, from which we derive such English words as “seismology,” referring to the study of earthquakes. Strong’s Lexicon defines it as “a commotion, i.e. (of the air) a gale, (of the ground) an earthquake—earthquake, tempest” (Strong’s No. 4578).
So seismos has a broader meaning than just the earth shaking. Matthew 8 records how a violent storm overtook Jesus and His disciples on the Sea of Galilee, threatening to capsize their boat and drown them—until Jesus miraculously calmed the winds and waves.
The word used in Matthew 8:24 for this powerful storm is seismos , here translated “tempest.” So we see that seismos can also refer to violent storms and isn’t limited strictly to earthquakes. When Jesus foretold “famines, pestilences and earthquakes in various places,” His words encompass natural disasters that include earthquakes, but can also apply to hurricanes, tornadoes and other such deadly storms.
As we saw with Hurricane Katrina, these storms can be enormously destructive. Katrina took more than 1,200 lives and caused an estimated $200 billion in damage, not counting the economic hit from losses to shipping, oil and gas production, fishing and agriculture. New Orleans, devastated by the storm, will not fully recover for decades— if ever.
A hurricane like Katrina, which reached category 5 strength before weakening, can produce winds greater than 155 miles an hour and push ahead of it a wall of water 18 feet or higher, doing major damage to virtually anything in its path.
Are such natural disasters increasing as Jesus foretold?
The Sept. 16, 2005, issue of Science magazine reports on research by scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the National Center for Atmospheric Research. They concluded that while the total number of hurricanes and cyclones had not increased, there has been “a sharp increase during the past 35 years in the number of category 4 and 5 tropical cyclones, the most intense storms that cause most of the damage on landfall” (Richard Kerr, “Is Katrina a Harbinger of Still More Powerful Hurricanes?,” p. 1807).
Specifically, the frequency of the most dangerous and damaging storms—those rated category 4 and 5— increased by 80 percent from the 1970s to the latest decade.
This should certainly make us sit up and take notice. Later in Jesus Christ’s same prophecy, as recorded in Luke 21:25-28, He says: “And there will be signs in the sun, in the moon, and in the stars; and on the earth distress of nations, with perplexity, the sea and the waves roaring; men’s hearts failing them from fear and the expectation of those things which are coming on the earth …
“Then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. Now when these things begin to happen, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near.”

You might also be interested in...

Jesus Christ spoke of a coming "end of the age." What did He mean? What age did...

Friday, February 19, 2016

Global scope of crises leading toward prophesied "Beast"

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the Beast. This follows this post about the U.S. identity crisis. This follows this post about Christianity and Capitalism. This follows this post about diseases like Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

More than 80 years ago Winston Churchill wrote a four-volume history of World War I titled The World Crisis. Next year marks the 100th anniversary of the shooting of Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand in the Balkan city of Sarajevo, igniting the fires of the First World War in 1914. Even more so today than at that time, points on the globe previously thought insignificant can suddenly be vaulted into newspaper headlines by an emergent crisis with continental and even global implications.
London's Financial Times noted that “the latest crisis [in Cyprus] draws in Britain, Greece, Israel, the US and Turkey, not to mention Germany as the Eurozone's indispensable decision maker. The tremors hitting Cyprus could shake the world” (March 23-24, 2013). A Newsweek drophead pointed out, “The financial crisis in Cyprus has global ramifications” (Steve Hanke, “Little Island, Big Problem,” March 22).
We live in a shrinking world of globalism made ever smaller by incredible technological breakthroughs like the Internet with its countless websites and e-mails. A global economy propelled by a one-world government is not impossible, even during our chaotic, confused and divided age of human misrule. Passages in the biblical book of Revelation indicate that is precisely where man's governments will finally wind up.
A supranational power bloc centered in Central Europe will eventually emerge, according to Bible prophecy. Both this power and its totalitarian leader are referred to in the Bible as “the beast.” Scripture tells us, “And all the world marveled and followed the beast.”   When this happens, people will wonder: “Who is like the beast? Who is able to make war with him?”  (Revelation 13:3-4, emphasis added throughout).
But just how dictatorial and globally influential will this charismatic dictator of a coming world superpower become? Scripture shows that his power and influence will astonish the whole world. A union of 10 national or regional leaders will temporarily be fully behind this prophesied beast power. Although his murderous reign will be relatively short (see Revelation 17:12), while it lasts true Christians will find themselves in mortal physical danger.
The prophecy further states of the coming ruler: “And authority was given him [by Satan the devil] over every tribe, tongue, and nation” (Revelation 13:7; see also Revelation 13:4). Clearly an economic stranglehold will be a vital part of his virtual mesmerization of whole populations. “He causes all … to receive a mark … that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name” (verses 16-17). (To understand what this passage symbolizes, read the Bible study aid The Book of Revelation Unveiled .
Thankfully, these horrendous troubles will all end with the second coming of Jesus Christ. At that time, it will be announced, “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and He shall reign forever and ever” (Revelation 11:15, English Standard Version).
The Financial Times article mentioned earlier speaks of “new anxieties about the geopolitical impact of the [largely economic] instability in Cyprus. This island is not only physically divided between Greek and Turkish Cypriots, but is located in a combustible region where the military, diplomatic, energy and financial interests of at least a dozen powers collide.” Large foreign bank deposits are at the center of the island nation's economic difficulties. (Sources: Financial Times, Newsweek. )

You might also be interested in...

Explaining #NoHearingsNoVotes (With The Help of Harry Reid And Chuck Schumer)

A timely post from http://www.hughhewitt.com about the Supreme Court. This follows this post about the NBA. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump. This follows this post about Pope Francis's opinion of Mexicans.
You can follow me here.

Explaining #NoHearingsNoVotes (With The Help of Harry Reid And Chuck Schumer)

  posted by Hugh Hewitt
 
I made this short video today –complete with Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer clips– to explain #NoHearingsNoVotes.

The Washington Post ran this story on #NoHearingsNoVotes.

My CNNOpinion.com column “open letter” to Nevada Republican Senator Dean Heller is here.

Off to D.C. for @DonLemon for @CNNTonight Friday night and then @MeetthePress with @ChuckTodd on Sunday.

Thursday, February 18, 2016

U.S. Facing Identity Crisis

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the U.S. identity crisis. This follows this post about Christianity and Capitalism. This follows this post about diseases like Zika.This follows this post about the papacy. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

In my neighborhood vandalizing mailboxes is a way of stealing the identity of homeowners. Identity theft from unlocked mailboxes, a relatively new form of crime, is often devastating to its victims. And it also is difficult to deal with.
The United States is a prime example. The U. S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear cases regarding a Ten Commandments monument in a park surrounding the Texas Capitol and a Mercer County courthouse display of the Ten Commandments as a legal document in the state of Kentucky. Plaintiffs' attorneys argue that these are offensive, unwarranted intrusions that represent unconstitutional governmental attempts to establish religion.
One attorney stated that the Ten Commandments are “enormously divisive.” Ironically, there is a measure of truth in this statement. They are divisive because they are very definitive—defining morality by specific prohibitions of sinful behavior.
Paul explains the reason in Romans 8:7, “Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be.” The New Living Translation paraphrases, “For the sinful nature is always hostile to God. It never did obey God's laws, and it never will.”
This hostility is at the root of the current court cases, which are part of a larger identity crisis regarding morality. What is sought is not freedom of religion, but freedom from religion, which ironically amounts to religious oppression by denying the freedom to express religious convictions.
But are Ten Commandments displays appropriate on governmental property?
Justice Scalia of the Supreme Court has referred to the Ten Commandments as, “a symbol of the fact that government derives its authority from God” and thus “an appropriate symbol to put on government grounds.” This reflects the views of America's founders.
Ten Commandments displays on public property spring from America's national heritage, not from isolated demands of religious extremists. They are displayed in numerous governmental locations, including the Supreme Court building where the current cases are being considered. References to God appear in America's pledge of allegiance (which has also been challenged) and on its dollar bills. And sessions of Congress open with prayer.
Attempting to remove these monuments, displays and other religious customs is a serious threat to America's national identity. Some warn that if its history is rewritten, the nation's future may change as well. A completely different set of values will shape its laws and public policy.
Individual identity is also threatened, not only in America but around the world, by attempts to redefine the institutions of marriage and family. Sexual identity has become distorted by sex-change operations and many forms of bizarre behavior. Some look forward to the time when “marriage” can be available under virtually any circumstances. One woman recently expressed a desire to “march down the aisle … hand in paw” with her Great Dane. Sadly, hers is undoubtedly not an isolated case.
History is replete with examples of civilizations that perished as result of losing their identity. Other nations and cultures have survived for millennia, largely because they have retained their identity. A prime example is the modern nation of Israel, descendants of the ancient nation of Judah. The Jewish religion is well known for its traditions that celebrate the unique identity of the Jewish people and acknowledge the biblical roots of their history.
God gave the ancient nation of Israel the weekly Sabbath and annual Holy Days to remind them and their children of their identity (Ezekiel 20:19-20). He also instituted a theocracy based on the Ten Commandments and other laws (Deuteronomy 4:13-14) to preserve their national and individual identity and freedoms.
Sadly, wholesale neglect of these customs led to tragic results including civil war, division into two separate nations and finally national captivity. Although the Jewish people have retained their identity, the northern Kingdom of Israel became lost to history and is often referred to as “the Lost Ten Tribes.”
The good news is that when Jesus Christ returns to establish the Kingdom of God on earth, the law of God will be restored to its rightful position as the core of the government and morality for all nations, resulting in a happy, peaceful way of life for all (Isaiah 2:1-4).

Ann Corcoran: “Pope’s Publicity Stunt At Texas Border Timed To Influence US Election”

An interesting article from http://www.vdare.com about the Pope in Juarez. This follows this post about Governor Kasich. This follows this post about Pope Francis and immigration. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.



Ann Corcoran: "I’m never going to let readers forget that when the Pope went to the Italian island of Lampedusa in 2013 to “welcome” the illegal aliens coming from the Middle East and North Africa, he gave permission for the invasion of Europe. How dare he do the same here in a Presidential election year?"Ann Corcoran: "I’m never going to let readers forget that when the Pope went to the Italian island of Lampedusa in 2013 to “welcome” the illegal aliens coming from the Middle East and North Africa, he gave permission for the invasion of Europe. How dare he do the same here in a Presidential election year?"

Ann Corcoran: “Pope’s Publicity Stunt At Texas Border Timed To Influence US Election”


Ann Corcoran writes at Refugee Resettlement Watch:

From the Dallas Morning News about his walk with migrants he calls refugees (They are not refugees! People escaping poverty or crime are not legally refugees, but the Pope and the NO Borders Left are purposefully confusing the terminology.  They want all migrants-on-the-move to be called REFUGEES who are then entitled to protection and welfare):
In his first speech to the church hierarchy over the weekend in Mexico City, Francis wasted little time in addressing the plight of migrants. “So many families are separated,” he said, “and integration into the supposedly ‘promised land’ is not always as easy as some believe.”
From the beginning of his pontificate, Francis, himself the son of immigrants, has made the treatment of migrants and refugees worldwide a priority. His first travel outside Rome was to the Italian island of Lampedusa, where boatloads of asylum-seekers from the Middle East and Africa had been landing.
Catholic officials have said the pope’s original plan was to cross the U.S.-Mexico border during his visit as a symbolic gesture of unity, but security and logistical barriers put an end to that idea. U.S. authorities were fearful that such a move would bring an onslaught of people across the border.
The closest Francis will get to the United States is about 50 yards from El Paso.
Across the river and through the fences, a limited group of “Francis VIPs,” including unauthorized immigrants seeking asylum in the United States, will assemble along the border and await the pope’s blessing.
Since the Pope won’t do it, it is up to you, American patriots, to keep reminding your friends and neighbors that the Catholic Church in America receives millions of your tax dollars to resettle refugees (including tens of thousands of Muslims), to take care of the Unaccompanied Alien Children, to harbor illegal aliens and to lobby for more migrants and more money (for themselves)!
The story is Handful of migrants, refugees will greet Pope Francis as he walks along U.S.-Mexico border, By Alfredo Corchado, February 15, 2016.

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

Considering Governor Kasich as Illegal Immigration Ignoramus

An interesting article from www.numbersusa.com  about Governor John Kasich. This follows this post about subsidies that illegal immigrants received. This follows this post about Pope Francis and immigration. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.


politicskasich1028461222640x360

Why Can’t Johnny Learn? Considering Governor Kasich as Illegal Immigration Ignoramus


Do modern communications not reach Ohio, where John Kasich is the current governor? His ignorance about the past 30 years of immigration anarchy willfully ignored by the government is truly stunning and inexcusable in a serious Presidential candidate. His uninformed ramblings on national television Sunday were remarkable:
FOX NEWS HOST CHRIS WALLACE: You said comprehensive immigration reform, a path to legalization.
JOHN KASICH: Here’s the deal: finish the wall, have a guest-worker program where people can come work and go home, and then for the 11 1/2 million who are here who have not committed a crime since they’ve been here, then a path to legalization.
WALLACE: What about the argument that you have to fix the border before you even begin to discuss it?
KASICH: You get it all done, you get the border done and do the whole thing. Somebody says we gotta sequence it, I don’t have a problem with that. First we get the border, then in six months, we do this. That’s just a little detail. But we need to get it done. Look, I’ve done a hundred town hall meetings here . . . and the country wants answers.
During the February 6 GOP debate [Transcript], Kasich made a point of saying the resident illegal job thieves would not get citizenship, just “legalization” aka the work permit holy grail.
KASICH: And then for the 11.5 million that are here, if they have not committed a crime since they’ve been here, I believe they ought to pay some back taxes, pay a fine, never get on the path to citizenship, but get legalization. It is not — I couldn’t even imagine how we would even begin to think about taking a mom or a dad out of a house when they have not committed a crime since they’ve been here, leaving their children in the house. I mean, that is not, in my opinion, the kind of values that we believe in.
The promise of American jobs has attracted millions of foreign squatters to this country.

Like a number of immigration ignoramuses, Governor Kasich thinks citizenship is a big deal, but eventual voting only matters to political hacks like Luis Gutierrez who hope to ride open borders to greater power for the hispanic tribe. In the minds of the actual foreign job thieves, the ability to work legally in stupid-generous America is the whole point of their breaking in. Therefore:
Legalization, aka a work permit, is the real amnesty.
In addition, Kasich’s remark that securing the border is “just a little detail” really is stupendously dumb. The promises from Washington for border security at some future date have been a constant, meaningless meme. In 1996, Immigration and Naturalization Service Commissioner Doris Meissner made a rare prediction of a time-definite goal, that border security would be accomplished by 2001 at the latest:
California Border Patrols Busier Than Ever / Illegal immigrants line up despite tightened controls, San Francisco Chronicle, by Louis Freedberg, January 31, 1996
Meissner said that controlling the border is going to be a long- term, step-by-step process. “We’ve always said this would be a three- to five-year effort to build up to what would be needed,” she said.
So here we are, 20 years later and meaningless promises of American national security, border category, still fill the political atmosphere. It’s insulting to citizens when Governor Kasich says he can throw together some border security and then reward millions of foreign lawbreakers with a work permit amnesty. But he’s too clueless to be embarrassed at his stupidity.

Friday, February 12, 2016

Bilingualism, Canada, and Marco Rubio

A timely post from http://www.vdare.com about bilingualism in Canada and Marco Rubio. This follows this post about the TRUE CATHOLIC teaching on immigration. This follows this post about rap songs referencing Donald Trump. This follows this post about Pope Francis's true opinion of Mexicans.
You can follow me here.


Note: you can contact Conservative Party members of Canada's parliament about this here:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/default.aspx?Language=E

The Fulford File | Rubio, Republicans, “Our New Spanish-Speaking Overlords,” And How To Fight Creeping Bilingualism


Conservatism Inc. is falling over itself to welcome “our new Spanish-speaking overlords”—to adapt the famous scene from The Simpsons (itself adapted from the 1977 movie Empire of the Ants). The Republican Congressional leadership has chosen newly-minted Florida Senator Marco Rubio to give the response to President Obama’s February 12 State Of The Union—half in Spanish.

(It’s a pattern—Rubio gave the GOP response to the Supreme Court’s Obamacare decision partly in Spanish, and spoke in Spanish, briefly, at the Republican Convention).
Does this mean the United States is turning into Mexico?
No, it’s worse—it means the United States is turning into Canada.
Canada has a lot of experience with bilingualism, all of it bad.
I’ve noted before that the ludicrous Canadian custom of making speeches in both languages—saying everything twice, once in English and once in the minority language—is coming to America.
Well, the Canadians have invented an even worse absurdity: the speaker alternates between languages, leaving large parts of the audience unsure what he’s saying.
Thus Ottawa Citizen columnist Dan Gardner blogged acidly (April 19, 2010):
John Ralston Saul`s public speech entitled: “Reinventing the language of citizenship/ inventer la langue de la citoyennete” will be presented in Canada`s two official languages Please note the speech will alternate between French and English with no simultaneous translation.
John Ralston Saul is a member of the globalist elite, born in Ottawa, educated in Montreal and London. He writes books in English, but his website offers visitors the choice of English, French, or Spanish.
Gardner asked
I can understand why the lecture might be given in French. Or in English. Or in either with translation. But both with no translation? Do that and you will ensure that more than nine out of ten people in the city [VDARE.com note: Vancouver, B. C.] in which you are giving the lecture will be unable to understand what you are saying. So what is this except a symbolic gesture of… Of what, exactly? Bilingual idealism? Contempt for the unilingual?
The explicitness of that notice is rare but neither the attitude nor the practice are, at least not in Ottawa. Years ago, after moving here, I was amazed at how, in Official Ottawa—i.e. the Ottawa of the federal government—it`s perfectly acceptable for public speakers to switch back and forth between languages, without translation, even to the extent of setting up a joke in one language and delivering the punchline in another. This would be admirable in an ideal world in which all Canadians could laugh along. But in this world, this is a very effective way to shutting out the overwhelming majority of Canadians who are unilingual.
Funny. But in fact creeping bilingualism is not funny at all. It’s a serious threat to unilingual members of the majority language community a.k.a. English-speakers, in both Canada and  the U.S.
Among other things, bilingualism ultimately means job preference for the minority language group—and years of language lessons for English-speakers who want those jobs.
 Thus in Canada, many federal civil service jobs are reserved for people who speak both languages, which means, de facto¸ it is dominated by French speakers.
George Jonas, a Hungarian immigrant to Canada, has described the dynamic:
If Canada was to be a bilingual country with most power concentrated in Ottawa`s federal government, in the nature of things it would be Francophones [VDARE.com note: CanSpeak for French-speakers, but  really it’s a matter of blood] who would end up occupying most positions of authority in it. The inclination is always stronger for minorities to learn the language of a majority. Anglos weren`t going to be bilingual in significant numbers.  Francophones would be, and so rule the land.
[Unintended Consequences, by George Jonas, National Post, October 14, 2005]
“Rule the land” means a lot of French-speakers in the higher reaches of the Federal Civil Service.
It also means that leadership of the Liberal Party has tended to alternate between a person of French ancestry and Anglo ancestry.  But, either way, they must be fluent in French.
Canada’s Conservatives, for whom few Francophones vote, also try to recruit candidates who can speak French the way Rubio can speak Spanish—or at least the way George W. Bush could: badly but sincerely. Candidates who can’t do that fall by the wayside, although otherwise qualified and electable. VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow wrote in Commentary magazine back in 1987 that
When the federal Progressive Conservative party chose a new leader in 1983, it came under intense pressure to pick one fluent in both “official languages,” although virtually all of its support came from unilingual English Canada and it could technically have won enough seats there to form a government without any Francophone support at all. This scared out of the race a strong Western candidate, the premier of Alberta, and seriously destabilized the campaign of John Crosbie, from the Atlantic province of Newfoundland (who would probably still have succeeded if the English-speaking convention delegates had not been supplemented by French speakers conjured up by affirmative action in Quebec).
The winner was an unrepresentative, Wendell Willkie-type sport, Brian Mulroney, an emollient Montreal labor lawyer with roots in the semi-Francophone Irish community of rural Quebec. Mulroney had only joined the party because of an accident of sectarian politics in his youth. He had never fought a parliamentary election, and his Conservative credentials were essentially based on his self-appointed role as the party’s ambassador to the Francophones. [A Cautionary Case of Bilingualism Commentary Magazine, November 1987]
Sound familiar?
Canada`s federal official bilingualism turned into a jobs program for Canadians of French ancestry—the minority language group—entrenching them in control of the federal Civil Service with remarkable speed. Francophones are less than a quarter of Canada’s population. But less than twenty years after the passage of the Official Languages Act,
“Of deputy ministers and senior administrators the proportion is now 32% francophone. The Privy Council Office is 48.2% francophone. The Federal-Provincial Relations Office is 49.1%, the Canadian Intergovernment Secretariat a resounding 81.8%. The big-spending Department of Supply and Services, which decides whether a contract will go, say, to Montreal or Vancouver, is 41.1% francophone The Secretary of State Department, which hands out federal largesse, is 67.9%. The Public Service Commission, which chiefly decides on promotions within the civil service—will the job go to Peter Black from Winnipeg or Pierre Leblanc of Trois Rivieres?—is 60.5% francophone. And if the francophone proportion of the armed forces during the Second World War was somewhat lacking, the francophone proportion of the Department of Veterans Affairs compensates. It is 41.2% francophone”
[Here are a few percentages Mr. Masse hasn`t mentioned, By Ted Byfield, Alberta Report, July 25, 1988]
In the U.S., I’ve reported that police officers already have to learn Spanish (a) for survival and (b) so they can get points for promotion.
That’s bad, but what’s worse is that one of the jobs that Anglos may be unable to fill is President of the United States.
Marco Rubio is an inexperienced freshman Senator. He’s giving the GOP’s SOTU response to Obama, instead of a grown-up Senator like, say, Jeff Sessions, because he can speak Spanish and is “Hispanic” (actually, a white Cuban).
That was enough to get him almost nominated for Vice-President. It might still get him nominated for President.
And Hispanics still wouldn’t vote Republican.
Here’s a news story from 2000:
“I hope very much that I`m the last president in American history who can`t speak Spanish,“ Clinton said in a nod to presidential candidates Al Gore and George W. Bush, both of whom are comfortable throwing Spanish phrases into their speeches…”
Clinton didn’t get his wish—the current president speaks no foreign languages at all.
But the report of his speech was headed Clinton says speaking Spanish is not enough for Hispanics, [By Calvin Woodward, Associated Press, June 13, 2000]. Clinton made the obvious point that Hispanics vote for Bill Clinton’s party because they like stuff from the government.
Peter Brimelow commented, based on his Canadian experience (he wrote an entire book on Canada):
…English Canadians speak only English. Therefore they are ineligible for the top offices, and many government positions, in their own country.
The beneficiaries of bilingualism: firstly, the minority language group, who have more opportunity to become bilingual; secondly, the Anglo upper class, who are more likely to spend money on time on language education.
Dubya to Reagan Democrats (not for the first time): drop dead.
Exactly as Brimelow warned, twelve years later—notwithstanding all the Hispanic hype—it is the GOP’s failure to appeal to the white working class, especially in the Rust Bowl states, that cost Romney the Presidency.
Of course, there are options. In complete contrast to Canada’s federal bilingualism, the government of the French-speaking province (=state) of Quebec has defended and imposed French unilingualism.
As Peter Brimelow said at the Pro English panel at CPAC last year:
Over a period of several years in the 70s and 80s, successive governments in the province of Quebec passed legislation which essentially crushed the use of English in Quebec. You could not require an employee to speak English in most circumstances. You couldn’t even display signs in English in Quebec….
I think this example of what the Quebeckers have done, although it’s not pretty, is most interesting. It has actually completely broken the back of the Anglophone resistance to Quebec separatism. If people don’t like Quebec separatism, they leave. In fact the Quebec Anglos are now the most bilingual of all the ethnic groups in Canada….they’re essentially assimilated.
I think that something like this Quebec language legislation is going to have to happen here in the U.S.
It’s not enough to have Official English as the government level. I get email all the time, from people in places like eastern Washington State, who say their kids can’t get jobs in McDonalds and stuff because they don’t speak Spanish. This creeping institutional bilingualism is a ferocious attack on the living standards of the American working class, the blue collar workers—just as current immigration policy in general is.
It will take Quebec-style legislation to stop it. They’ve shown us the way.
Quebec has shown the way. But it’s increasingly clear that the GOP/ Conservatism Inc. is not capable of taking it.
James Fulford is a writer and editor for VDARE.com.


Thursday, February 11, 2016

Current Events & Trends: Nation-states struggle with immigration

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about immigration. This follows this post about Valentine's Day. This follows this post about the papacy. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
 
As in Paris, the perpetrators are usually Muslim immigrants. The scale and the intensity of the rioting has caused some observers to question the common belief that Sweden has treated immigrants much better than most other European countries.
Turkey has also experienced major riots in a number of cities, although immigration is not necessarily a major causal factor. Apparently there is widespread dissatisfaction with the government in power and the prime minister in particular. It's hard to be both a Western-style democracy and an Islamist state at the same time. The two don't fit together well.
Most nations have their share of disaffected immigrants, including the United States. The drophead of a London Times article by BBC Radio 4 presenter Justin Webb states, “Immigration will change the US in ways its politicians are only just beginning to grasp” (June 4). The article is titled, “America's Future Is Latino, Asian and Liberal.” Future North American demographics are slated to lean much more toward Central and South America.
The Anglo-Saxon vote is no longer expected to be a deciding factor in future U.S. presidential elections. Immigrants who have or will obtain citizenship and voting rights may well impact future elections in a big way. If and when the funds run out and the government can no longer print money legally (see “In danger: the status of the U.S. dollar”), we could possibly see massive rioting in major American cities on a scale and intensity that will shock the world and perhaps bring the nation to its knees. (Source: The Times [London].)

You might also be interested in...