Obama’s Plan = White Slavery

A timely post about from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com about the racial dimension to Obamacare. This follows this post about Republicans who helped Obamacare. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.


Obama’s Plan = White Slavery


By Nicholas Stix


The John Doe who calls himself “Barack Obama” will pay illegal bonuses to Obamacare workers who racially discriminate against white patients and white healthcare providers, and will lock qualified whites out of medical schools, replacing them with laughably unqualified, even illiterate minorities.

See my VDARE colleague Patrick Cleburne’s story.

Why Romney Failed With Northern Whites

A very interesting post from www.Vdare.com about Northern whites voting against Mitt Romney. This follows this post about majority white states that voted against Mitt Romney, as contrasted with the "Hispanic vote" coverage.   This follows this post about a race hoax at U.T. Austin.  This follows this post about Emmit Till. In the meantime, you can read a very interesting book HERE.

Hitler's Revenge: Why Romney Failed With Northern Whites


http://www.vdare.com/articles/hitlers-revenge-why-romney-failed-with-northern-whites

By Patrick Cleburne




NB - The Pacific North West was originally settled by Yankee migrants.



Over at Occidental Dissent, Hunter Wallace has expanded on John Derbyshire’s observation


Barack Obama wasn't re-elected by blacks, Hispanics, or Asians, though they helped at the margins; he was re-elected by Yankees.



to assemble the facts in detail, complete with skilful illustration. The Blinding Light of White Nationalism: The American Nations and the 2012 Election  is worth spending some time on.





Here’s the percentage of the White vote won by John Kerry and Barack Obama in the 2004, 2008, and 2012 presidential elections:



Northeast



New York: 49% (2004), 52% (2008), 49% (2012)

Massachusetts: 59% (2004), 59% (2008), 57% (2008)

Connecticut: 51% (2004), 51% (2004), 51% (2012)

New Hampshire: 50% (2004), 54% (2008), 51% (2012)

New Jersey: 49% (2008), 43% (2012)

Pennsylvania: 45% (2004), 48% (2008), 42% (2012)

Vermont: 65% (2008), 66% (2012)

Maine: 58% (2008), 57% (2012)

Rhode Island: 57% (2008)

Maryland: 56% (2008), 43% (2012)

Delaware: 55% (2008)



Here’s the percentage of the White vote won by John Kerry and Barack Obama in Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida in 2004, 2008, and 2012 presidential elections:

Weakening South

Florida: 42% (2004), 42% (2008), 37% (2012)

North Carolina: 27% (2004) 35% (2008), 31% (2012)

Virginia: 32% (2004), 39% (2008), 37% (2012)

How does the White vote for Barack Obama compare with the other Southern states?



Solid South



Mississippi: 11% (2008), 11% (2012)

Alabama: 10% (2008), 15% (2012)





Wallace notes





…it turns out that there is a much bigger black and Hispanic electorate in Mississippi than either Florida, Virginia, or North Carolina. The problem in these three states is simply that 11% of Whites in Mississippi voted for Barack Obama whereas 31% to 37% are voting for him in Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia.



He then turns to the immediately key GOP problem



Let’s do some more fun comparisons of the White vote for Barack Obama:

Texas: 28% (2008)

California: 53% (2008), 45% (2012)

Kentucky: 36% (2008)

Wisconsin: 54% (2008), 48% (2012)

West Virginia: 93% all White, all red

Vermont: 94% White,  all  blue

West Virginia are Vermont are the two whitest states in America. In Vermont, every county voted for Barack Obama. In West Virginia, every county voted for Mitt Romney. California and Texas are two of the most Hispanic states in America. Yet California is a solid blue state and Texas is a solid red state.







The VDARE.com view of the longer term GOP/Generic American Party problem is of course that excessive immigration is allowing the Democrats to elect a new people.



But that is not actually the 20012 problem. 20012 has parallels with the 1964 Goldwater debacle: weak performance amongst non-Southern whites, particularly in areas initially peopled by Yankees. This of course was beautifully documented in the Kevin Phillips classic The Emerging Republican Majority.



That these people would not rise up in rage against a candidate whose entire agenda is racial spoils-gathering at their expense of course reflects their deep naivety on matters of ethnicity – a long tradition.



But more particularly it is another case of the effectiveness of Hitler’s Revenge. As I said discussing the Obamaphone row





This election can be formulated as a referendum on whether Americans like rich white men. Or it can be formulated as a referendum on racial socialism – do Americans as a whole approve of the use of Federal power to expropriate resources from Whites and transfer them to people of color. There is no middle way.



The latter course would mean the GOP behaving as the Generic American Party.







For that, Team Romney and its Consultants lacked the stomach.



And failed theNation

Dog-Whistling Drudge Dodges Immigration Outrages at Democratic Convention

A very interesting post from www.Vdare.com about media coverage on immigration issues. This follows this post about the consequenses of the President's Executive Order Amnesty. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE.

Dog-Whistling Drudge Dodges Immigration Outrages at Democratic Convention


http://www.vdare.com/posts/dog-whistling-drudge-dodges-immigration-outrages-at-democratic-convention

By Patrick Cleburne




Triumphant Illegal Alien addresses Democratic Convention. Not newsworthy to Drudge



I see the Drudge Report has been in full Dog-Whistling mode for the Democratic Convention, serving up stories clearly intended to rile up and energize the Republican base:




Delegates at convention boo, hiss, jeer...



(linked to the Real Clear Politics story Jerusalem And God Vote Gets Booed At Dem Convention)



'VOTE BLACK' BUTTONS HIT CONVENTION HALL...



Florida DNC Boss: Christians Want Jews Slaughtered...



(A classic!)



and



Chance of rain at Obama speech time: 0%...



(VDARE.com comment: Told you so!)



Completely missing however was one of the biggest outrages of all:



Illegal immigrant makes history, addresses Democratic convention  By Hector Becerra The Los Angeles Times September 5, 2012



…when Benita Veliz stepped up to the lectern at the Democratic National Convention, she made history. The 27-year-old from San Antonio became the first illegal immigrant to address a national political convention…



In 2009, she allegedly rolled through a stop sign and was stopped by a police officer. Veliz had a Mexican consular card but no driver’s license…That started deportation proceedings against her… Veliz was ultimately spared deportation after President Obama signed an executive order to halt the deportation of some young illegal immigrants.



This dramatic flaunting of Obama’s Administrative Amnesty Coup D’état was clearly suppressed to avoid drawing attention to Romney’s shamefully weak response – and increases suspicion that a flip-flop is being planned.



Similarly Drudge made no mention of the refusal of ICE to take action against the “UndocuBus” illegal alien demonstrators at the Convention, as noted by Federale. UndocuBus is so egregious even the New York Times permitted dissent: Pure and Simple Lawlessness by John C Eastman August 1 2012 (H/T One Old Vet).



There was a time when Drudge was a reliable source of immigration outrage stories, which continue to infuriate the base. The message is plain: Drudge is now an obedient servant of Conservatism Inc, and GOP immigration policy is bought and paid for.

Should Patriots Write In Arizona's Governor Brewer For President?

A very interesting post from www.Vdare.com about Jan Brewer's bold leadership in Arizona! This follows this post about Executive Order Amnesty.  This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE.

Should Patriots Write In Arizona's Governor Brewer For President?


http://www.vdare.com/posts/should-patriots-write-in-arizonas-governor-brewer-for-president

By Patrick Cleburne




Arizona's Brewer: At last, a Champion?



While generally the Obamacrat Day of Infamy – the implementation of Administrative Amnesty – has been greeted with what sounds suspiciously like a “Me-Too” silence from Romney and the Congressional GOP, one champion has stepped forward. Politico whined Gov. Jan Brewer defies W.H. on immigration by Mackenzie Wienger 8/16/12



Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed an executive order on Wednesday to deny benefits to young illegal immigrants who qualify under the White House’s new deferred action policy.



The Republican governor issued the order in response to the Obama administration’s decision to allow eligible illegal immigrants under 30 the chance to apply for a work permit in the United States...



The new deferred action program “does not confer upon them any lawful or authorized status and does not entitle them to any additional public benefits,” Brewer wrote in her order



The Christian Science Monitor has a more analytical account: Jan Brewer leads 'constitutional throwdown' against DREAM Act-lite by Patrik Jonsson August 16 2012.



This starts with the highest estimate I have seen yet of the size of the torrent expected to pour through the Obama loophole:



President Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which took effect Wednesday, allows as many as 2 million illegal immigrants who were brought to the US as children and meet several other criteria to apply for a two-year deportation deferral.



and continues



Brewer’s latest move could be part of an effort to build support in Congress and other states to challenge the constitutionality of DACA, which critics say goes beyond the White House's constitutional purview…



Brewer's order “is a broader challenge to the federal government, because this [Obama] order, this policy, is clearly illegal,” says Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies,…“It’s trying to set up a confrontation that will focus not just on Governor Brewer’s order but on the illegality of the president’s policy."





VDARE.com salutes Governor Jan Brewer. She may have been late to the cause, and Roger Devlin said reviewing her book



Jan Brewer is probably the closest thing America has left to a citizen politician… Brewer still fails to betray the least suspicion that opposition to SB 1070 might be not be related to any alleged “civil rights” concerns—but sheer demographic warfare against the historic American nation.



But alone amongst the Republican leaders she was ready with a cogent and brave response to the long-heralded Amnesty implementation. (So brave that Mark Krikorian’s media home National Review Online has avoided mentioning it.)



I see Lew Rockwell addressing his Paul confederates has proposed - entirely rationally given Romney’s foreign policy subservience - that his friends should not vote: The Only Choice on November 6th LewRockwell.com August 15, 2012



Maybe Immigration Patriots, faced with mounting evidence that Romney’s immigration policies are going to be subordinate to the Cheap Labor Lobby or worse will respond by writing in Jan Brewer for President.

Obama's Immigration Coup: If GOP Afraid To Defend Americans, How About Defending The Constitution?

A very interesting post from http://www.vdare.com/ about the rational to fight Barack Obama's amnesty executive order. This follows this post about Bills to block Obama's amnesty.  This follows this post about Marco Rubio's DREAM Act. This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read this very interesting book HERE!

Obama's Immigration Coup: If GOP Afraid To Defend Americans, How About Defending The Constitution?


http://www.vdare.com/posts/obamas-immigration-coup-if-gop-afraid-to-defend-americans-how-about-defending-the-constitution

By Patrick Cleburne


Signing the Constitution, 1787: A Dead White Male Irrelevance?

As the hours go by, it has become painfully apparent that neither Romney nor any other prominent Republican “leader” is willing to denounce Friday’s Amnesty Coup D’état by President Obama. (Nicely put, Bigtimer).



Obama can play the Race card continuously and the GOP Establishment seems to lack the stomach to call him on it. And apparently the Cheap Labor Lobby or an even more sinister force has a veto on Republican immigration policy.



But there is a much broader issue raised by Obama’s Friday putsch, which is well discussed in an extraordinary essay posted on Politico on Saturday morning: Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws 6/16/12 by Steve Friess:



Rather than pushing new laws through a divided Congress to enact his agenda, Obama is relying on federal agencies to ignore, or at least not defend, laws that some of his important supporters — like Hispanic voters and the gay community — don’t like.



As of Friday, the federal government won’t deport undocumented immigrants under age 30 who came to the United States as children. It is a temporary, de facto implementation of a part of the stalled DREAM Act…

On gay rights, too, the administration has asked agencies to do less. In February 2011, the Justice Department announced it would not defend DOMA against court challenges — an unusual step for the agency, which typically defends legal challenges to laws on the books…In August, Obama’s DHS announced it would no longer deport the noncitizen spouses of gay Americans — a direct contradiction to DOMA as well.



The tactic has its start in the earliest days of the administration. In October 2009, the Department of Justice announced it would not prosecute medical marijuana users or suppliers in states where it’s legal, despite the state laws contradicting federal law. Federal law generally trumps state law in such matters.



Charles Krauthammer was absolutely correct to say on Fox News on Friday-



This is out-and-out lawlessness. You had a clip of the president himself say months ago 'I cannot do this on my own because there are laws on the books.' Well, I have news for the president: The laws remain on the books, they haven't changed,"

…"He proposed the DREAM Act of which the executive order is a variation. He proposed a DREAM Act. The Congress said no. The Congress is the one who makes the laws…This is not discretion…This is the declaration of a whole new set of criteria, which is essentially resurrecting the legislation that the Congress has said no to."

“And I think this is not how you run a constitutional Republic. This ought to be in the hands of Congress, and it is an end-run. …This is out-and-out lawlessness. This is not how you govern. And I think that's the first issue that should be on the table,"





Krauthammer: Obama's Immigration Policy Is "Out-And-Out Lawlessness" Real Clear PoliticsJune 15 2012



VDARE.com has not always had an especially high opinion of Krauthammer,  but he does sometimes get things right: in this case he has excelled himself

Since we scorn them so often, it is only fair to note National Review has an excellent editorial on the topic (probably written by non-staffer Mark Krikorian) - Illegal Amnesty June 16 2012



The president does not possess the constitutional authority to do what he proposes to do…

The president’s executive order violates the constitutional separation of powers that defines the political architecture of our republic. If Congress allows this illegitimate executive order to stand, it will have in effect delegated its power to make law to the president.

Congress already has spoken on this amnesty proposal, and the answer was “No.” Even the president has to take no for an answer when the law requires him to. Barack Obama once knew that. He probably still does.







The Politico essay quotes a pitifully wimpish descendent of Theodore Roosevelt:



“If the president says we’re not going to enforce the law, there’s really nothing anyone can do about it,” University of Pennsylvania constitutional law professor Kermit Roosevelt said.



This is quite wrong of course: a President systematically breaking the laws he has sworn to



...preserve, protect, and defend



can and should be impeached.



No doubt that is far beyond the courage of the Republican Congresscritters. But the immediate point is that they could quite validly couch forceful opposition to Obama’s coup purely in terms of the Constitution – about which many Americans care very deeply.



This would save them from enduring the agonies of Hitler’s Revenge.

Is Your Congressman Cosponsoring H.R. 5957, To Block Obama's Administrative Amnesty?

A very interesting post from www.NumbersUSA.com  about a House Bill that will block Obama's administrative amnesty. This follows this post about a House Bill that will allow the Border Patrol to operate on federal lands.   This follows this post about Marco Rubio's DREAM Act. This follows this post about the Black Caucus hurting Black Americans with their immigration stand. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read this very interesting book HERE!

Is Your Congressman Cosponsoring H.R. 5957, To Block Obama's Administrative Amnesty?




http://www.vdare.com/posts/is-your-congressman-cosponsoring-hr-5957-to-block-obamas-administrative-amnesty

By Patrick Cleburne




Congressman David Schweikert (AZ-5th)



H/T Daniel Horowitz of RedState – who was also impressively fast on the draw when Obama’s Youth Amnesty was announced – for Congressman Schweikert Takes a Stand Against Obama’s Illegal Amnesty   June 19th 2012



One man has stepped forward to put an end to Obama’s kingdom. Congressman David Schweikert (R-AZ) has introduced a bill, H.R. 5957, which would block the Secretary of Homeland Security from deferring deportations or from limiting the enforcement of our immigration laws.



There are scattered signs that GOP Congressmen – all of whom of course face the electorate in November - are getting worried that Romney’s contemptibly weak failure to condemn the Obamacrat Administrative Amnesty coup, even on non-racially charged Constitutional grounds, will cost them votes. They already face the likely abstention of the Paulistas due to the sale of foreign policy to the Neocons. And just possibly, some of them are realizing that properly handled, the issue could galvanize the white vote, as we have discussed here and here.



Speaker Boehner should redeem himself by rapidly bringing this measure to a vote (and not just a voice vote). The reason no immigration legislation was attempted in the 111th Congress despite towering Democrat majorities was that members were afraid to be seen voting for Amnesty. This vote is doubly lethal because quite apart from the substance of the issue a great many Americans revere the Constitution.



In the mean time, whether or not a Congressman co-sponsors this bill is going to be an excellent acid test of his soundness on immigration reform.



Of course, the proper response in VDARE.com’s view is impeachment, well argued recently by Michael Filozof at American Thinker: If We Took the Constitution Seriously, Obama Would Be Impeached June 16, 2012 (H/T Angry White Dude). But this tactic is less scary.



Tracking who signs on to HR 5957 is going to be very revealing.

A timely from www.Vdare.com about the Trayvon Martin shooting case. This follows this previous post about it. This follows this post about a book to read in this current environment that you can get here from your library. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!

http://www.vdare.com/posts/sbpdl-provides-trayvon-martin-antidote

SBPDL Provides Trayvon Martin Antidote

By Patrick Cleburne

Trayvon Martin: Election Year Stimulant.
We are clearly in for a deluge of anti-white agitprop over the shooting death of black youth Trayvon Martin in Florida, very convenient for arousing the Black vote in an election year.

Stuff Black People Don’t Like has published a valuable if characteristically scorching antidote raising crucial matters of perspective:

Merely pointing out that Black males are responsible for a disproportionate amount of crime in America (as we learned yesterday in the entry on Chicago, where Black males are primary reason The Second City is considered dangerous) is viewed as the ultimate evil in society...

Who cares that white people were pulled from their cars in the summer of 2011 at the Wisconsin State Fair in Milwaukee by scores of Black people and beaten; Who cares that white people have been targeted by Blacks in Philadelphia, Columbia, Peoria, Akron, St. Louis, Cleveland, Chicago, and a number of other cities since Mein Obama’s election to the White House, all under the impression that “This is a Black world”; who cares that interracial crime is basically a one-way street, with white people the targets of Black criminality 9 out of the 10 times; the answer is no one....

Eric “My People” Holder’s DOJ getting involved in the George Zimmerman – Trayvon Martin story, but refusing to even look at the horrible rates of Black-on-white violence that swept America in the summer of 2011 shows that white people have no rights in BRA, save the right to continue paying for their own dispossession.

(VDARE.com note BRA = Black Ruled America)

I see our old friend Nicholas Stix is taking an interest in the case as well.

The CBS/GOP Debate Atrocity Quantified

An urgent post from http://www.vdare.com/ analyzing coverage of the GOP candidates by the Mainstream Media. This follows this previous post about it. This follows this post about the Presidential Candidate strongest on immigration.  This follows this post  about Louisiana suing about the appropriations of House Seats and the Electoral College(think about redistricting in your state)!   This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants such as the 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso, where President Barack Obama recently bashed immigration enforcement! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

And Remember when contacting public officials to please be firm but respectful. Any over the top messages could result in law enforcement action against you. Just let these politicians know that you are aware of what they have done and that you intend to remove them from office in the 2012 elections.


The CBS/GOP Debate Atrocity Quantified


http://www.vdare.com/posts/the-cbsgop-debate-atrocity-quantified

By Patrick Cleburne

On Sunday I blogged: Saturday's GOP Debate: MSM Mask Slips - Foreign Policy, Immigation Dissenters To Be Silenced and now with characteristic vitality and industry Youth for Western Civilization has published a valuable quantification: CBS Memo Confirms Media Selection of GOP Candidates By John Anderson



"Although CBS has defended their actions by saying “Bachmann remains at 4% in the polls,”...this does not explain why Rick Perry was given the most speaking time, since Rick Perry has also remained mired in single digits according to the same CBS polls. Rick Santorum, with half of Bachmann's support, was given almost twice as much time as Bachmann. Jon Huntsman, whose support was a quarter of Bachmann's, was also given more time than her. Ron Paul, who placed ahead of Bachmann in the poll, was given less than half as much time as Bachmann."



The link is to the We Occupy The Web! blog, which has done its own counting:



"TIME TO TALK during the televised 1st hour of the GOP debate tonight: Rick Perry:..............7.75 minutes (Yes the Alzheimer case got the most allotted) Mitt Romney:..........6.5 minutes Newt Gingrich:........6.0 minutes Herman Cain:.........5.75 minutes Rick Santorum:.......5.25 minutes Jon Huntsman:........3.5 minutes Michelle Bachmann: 3.25 minutes Ron Paul: ...............1.5 minutes (Ignored as usual!)"



Of course the most extreme aspect of the atrocity was the virtually complete repression of Ron Paul, who as the only real dissenter on foreign policy, arguably in a “debate” supposedly devoted to the subject should have had as much as half the time. Anderson points out:



"Ron Paul was almost completely ignored, given only 89 seconds, despite (or because of) being outspoken on many foreign policy issues for years.... In fact... the candidates were given speaking time in reverse order of foreign policy expertise. Paul received the least. Michelle Bachmann, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, received the second least. Jon Huntsman, a recent ambassador to China...received the third least."



Anderson opened his piece by offering his analysis:



"A couple months ago, I discussed the media selection of 'frontrunner' status in the GOP primary. What happens is the 'mainstream' media decides who the 'frontrunners' should be, then gives these candidates large amounts of media attention, and the designation of 'frontrunner' status becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; as people called by polling companies tend to pick candidates they have heard about frequently in the news."



True enough in an immediate sense. But the problem is fundamentally deeper. The concept of deciding political issues by debate rather than force came to America as part of its WASP heritage. It is far beyond the comprehension of most other cultures.

The American MSM is a not a WASP culture zone.

MSM Mask Slips - Immigation Dissenters To Be Silenced

An urgent post from http://www.vdare.com/ analyzing coverage of the GOP candidates by the Mainstream Media. This follows this post about the Presidential Candidate strongest on immigration.  This follows this post  about Louisiana suing about the appropriations of House Seats and the Electoral College(think about redistricting in your state)!   This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants such as the 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso, where President Barack Obama recently bashed immigration enforcement! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

And Remember when contacting public officials to please be firm but respectful. Any over the top messages could result in law enforcement action against you. Just let these politicians know that you are aware of what they have done and that you intend to remove them from office in the 2012 elections.



Saturday's GOP Debate: MSM Mask Slips - Foreign Policy, Immigation Dissenters To Be Silenced

By Patrick Cleburne


MSM to GOP Dissidents: You can attend - but you can't speak!

They may seem interminable, but in fact the GOP Presidential debates are proving very valuable. Last night’s for a crucially important reason: it produced proof of the MSM’s steely determination to control and limit public debate.

Two candidates have complained (with perfect justice) about the way they were treated: Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann. The facts are decently presented in GOP Candidates Blast CBS for ‘Disgraceful’ Bias at South Carolina Debate By Matthew Jaffe ABC News Nov 12, 2011



"Paul’s spokesman Jesse Benton accused CBS of “disgraceful” actions that stemmed from an “arrogance” in thinking that “they can choose the next president.”

“Ron Paul consistently polls among the top three in the key early voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire,” Benton said in a statement. “He is polling in double digits in most respected polls. …And, Congressman Paul has contrasting views on foreign policy that many Americans find worthy of inquiry and discussion. CBS’s treatment of Congressman Paul is disgraceful, especially given that tonight’s debate centered on foreign policy and national security.

“Congressman Paul was only allocated 90 seconds of speaking in one televised hour,” Benton said."



The Paul campaign is absolutely correct. Paul is the only dissident out of the eight on foreign policy (alas, not on immigration) and effectively excluding him from contribution meant in reality last night was a joint press conference, not a debate.

Michelle Bachmann got a little more time – and incontrovertible proof she was being kept to a minimum. Deliciously, CBS News Political Director John Dickerson accidently sent her campaign an email telling his staff not to commit to an after show interview:

“…let’s keep it loose though since she’s not going to get many questions…”

(VDARE.com emphasis.)

Fox Nation has the facsimile: Bachmann Blasts CBS For Manipulating Debate, Has Proof Nov 13, 2011

Why Ron Paul’s opposition to America’s overseas adventures is repressed is obvious. VDARE.com is not a foreign policy site: once again, I personally look to Justin Raimondo for explication.

Michelle Bachmann’s repression – which I have noted before – is not due to foreign policy. There she is deplorably conformist. You can find out more from her here http://www.michelebachmann.com/

Where she is a dissident, however, is on immigration. Her NumbersUSA grading of B- is the easily the best of any contender: far ahead of Mitt Romney at C- to say nothing of Newt Gingrich at D-. She even tried to raise the topic in last Wednesday’s narrowly controlled debate on the Economy.

The GOP candidates in general continue to behave as if approval by the MSM Establishment is more important than catching the imagination of the Republican electorate. Foreign policy and Immigration are issues of which they are deathly afraid.


And based on the evidence of Saturday’s debate they have some justification.

The Strongest Presidential Candidate on Immigration!

An urgent post from http://www.vdare.com/ about the Presidential Candidate strongest on immigration. This follows this post about ways to deal with the current immigration/unemployment crisis in the U.S. This follows this post  about Louisiana suing about the appropriations of House Seats and the Electoral College(think about redistricting in your state)!   This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants such as the 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso, where President Barack Obama recently bashed immigration enforcement! For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read a very interesting book HERE!

And Remember when contacting public officials to please be firm but respectful. Any over the top messages could result in law enforcement action against you. Just let these politicians know that you are aware of what they have done and that you intend to remove them from office in the 2012 elections.




Daily Caller Notes "Immigration Hawks" Dislike Perry (But Misrepresents Bachmann)
 

By Patrick Cleburne


On Tuesday The Daily Caller produced Immigration hawks: Hit Perry on his record
By Caroline May





"Immigration has taken a back seat to the economy and jobs this primary season, much to the chagrin of immigration hawks who are concerned that current Republican front-runner Rick Perry is escaping scrutiny for his immigration record as governor of Texas"





What chagrins those with a real understanding of the matter, of course, is that immigration is central to "jobs and the economy" as Peter Brimelow pointed out last Thursday:







"Unemployment is an immigration issue, as VDARE.com has said repeatedly. Every palliative has failed, and there is literally no other answer except a crackdown on the illegal presence and a moratorium on legal immigration. Even my highly politic old friend David Frum has been mentioning this option recently, so it must now be considered acceptable in Establishment circles, even if some mysterious force keeps it out of public debate.





As I wrote in Alien Nation back in 1995 (!), there is an immigration dimension to virtually every public policy issue—certainly to "Economy in General" and "Federal budget deficit"…immigration is the Queen of American public policy issues. And none can be fully solved without addressing it."





May has a neat quote from Mark Krikorian (miss-spelled Kirkorian):







"“Perry has a certain amount of insulation on the immigration issue, [and it] isn’t just that his opponents haven’t really attacked him on it, it’s because it goes counter to his cowboy-shooting Texas swagger,” Mark Kirkorian, executive director for The Center for Immigration Studies, told The DC.





“People expect him to be really tough on immigration and they expect the elite East Coast Rockefeller Romney to be terrible on immigration,” Kirkorian continued. “The fact that it’s the opposite is a difficult thing to communicate."





Krikorian’s CIS colleague Ronald Mortensen has discussed the true Perry/Romney immigration contrast very well, as I noted in C.I.S. BEGS Romney: Sink The Immigration Sword Into Rick Perry!



A useful piece, although May does misrepresent the NumbersUSA situation:







"...Numbers USA, a limited immigration group, gave Perry a D- for his record (in fairness the rest of the GOP field hovers in the “D” and “C” range)"





They don’t.



Michelle Bachmann is far and away the best on the Numbers USA ranking, with a B- ranking, e.g. 3 grades above the next highest, Romney and Cain at C- and 6 grades above Perry. (Her Congressional career ranking is A.)



Is the Daily Caller vetoing Michelle Bachmann?

You can find out more from her here http://www.michelebachmann.com/