Showing posts with label Brooklyn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brooklyn. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

Ecumenism bridges a major gap: The Virgin Mary

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Mary. This follows this post about Pearl Harbor. This follows this post about Jesus Christ and Christmas. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

Some Anglicans are now beginning to accept the Roman Catholic devotion to the Virgin Mary. Wrote Stephen Bates, the religious affairs correspondent of The Times: “After nearly 500 years of intense division, Anglicans and Roman Catholic theologians yesterday decided that one of the two faiths' most fundamental differences—the position of Mary, the mother of Christ—should no longer divide them.”
A new document titled “Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ” was recently published in Seattle. It says: “We don't consider the practice of asking Mary and the saints to pray for us as communion dividing … We believe that there is no continuing theological reason for ecclesiastical division on these matters.” The Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission produced this document.
Historically, Protestants have normally had difficulty with the Catholic belief embodied in the idea of an Immaculate Conception, in essence meaning Mary was free from the stain of what theologians call original sin. Another stumbling block has been the Roman Catholic belief of her assumption into heaven, body and soul. Most Protestants have generally contended that there is no biblical basis for this religious belief.
Now at least one or two branches of Protestanism appear to be putting the goal of ecumenism before these and other differences—and perhaps gradually coming around to the Catholic way of thinking. To understand whether or not Mary is really in heaven, please request our free booklet Heaven and Hell: What Does the Bible Really Teach? (Source: The Guardian [London].)

You might also be interested in...

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Mexican Finance Minister Says Mexico Won’t Be “Bullied” To Fund Wall (There’s A Simple Solution)

An interesting article from http://www.vdare.com about the wall with Mexico. This follows this post about immigrants and income tax.This follows this post about Pope Francis and immigration. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.



Pay_for_the_Wall_Donald_J_Trump_for_President_-_2016-04-18_14.09.00

Mexican Finance Minister Says Mexico Won’t Be “Bullied” To Fund Wall (There’s A Simple Solution)


Luis-VidegarayTrump’s border wall proposal, and especially his proposal that Mexico paying for it, continues to elicit strong condemnation and refusal among the Mexican elite.
The latest Mexican government official on the bandwagon is Luis Videgaray, secretary of Hacienda, the powerful finance ministry. Unsurprisingly, Videgaray (pictured right) is a white Mexican.
From Bloomberg:
Mexican Finance Minister Luis Videgaray called billionaire Donald Trump’s proposal to force the country to pay for a wall along the U.S. border, or face economic consequences if it doesn’t, a kind of diplomatic harassment that’s doomed to fail.
Mexico Won’t Be ‘Bullied’ by Trump’s Threat to Fund Border Wall
By David Biller and Eric Martin, Bloomberg, April 17, 2016
This whole business about the wall and having Mexico pay for it has certainly gotten their attention, hasn’t it?
“Mexico will not pay for that wall, not only because it doesn’t make any sense for either Mexico or the U.S. to enter into that type of threat rhetoric, but it’s also a matter of dignity,” Videgaray said Saturday in an interview in Washington. “There’s no way in which Mexico can be bullied into doing such a thing.”
No way? How about the taxing of remittances to Mexico?
For Mexico, though, there is a simple solution. If the Mexican government doesn’t want to pay for the wall, then its officials should tell Mexicans not to send back remittances from U.S. territory.
Bloomberg has noticed Mexico’s strategy to get more Mexicans naturalized in the United States.
Mexico has taken action to counteract Trump’s anti-immigrant message, including mounting an unprecedented effort to covert the country’s many permanent residents in the U.S. into citizens, a status that would enable them to vote — presumably against Trump. Officially, Mexico says it respects U.S. sovereignty and has no strategy to influence the result of the presidential race. Yet diplomats are mobilizing to assist immigrants in gaining U.S. citizenship, hosting free workshops on naturalization.
For more information see Main Stream Media FINALLY Notices Meddling Mexicans Encouraging Immigrants To Naturalize And Vote Against Trump—But WHERE IS GOP? and Citing “Anti-Mexican Climate”, Names Carlos Sada As Next Mexican Ambassador To U.S.
Ask your senators and representatives if they think it’s ok for Mexico to meddle in our electoral politics.
Back to Videgaray.
 “The proposal to make Mexico pay for a wall and trying to achieve that through a set of threats is a proposal that has already failed,” said Videgaray, who was attending the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.
“Already failed”? It hasn’t even been tried!
According to Bloomberg’s own calculations, remittances were up in 2015:
Mexico received $24.8 billion in remittances last year, the highest level since 2008, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. In 2012, 98 percent of remittances to the Latin American nation’s $1.29 trillion economy came from the U.S., according to the Pew Research Center.
When remittances go up, that means either (1) there are more Mexicans in the U.S., (b) they are sending back more money, or (3) both. Either way, it’s money that could be taxed to build a wall.

Monday, April 11, 2016

It’s Official: A-Rod Now a Trophy Wife – “Men, the New Women” Alert

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ about Alex Rodriguez. This follows this post about Blockbuster video.This follows this post about some of the movies from last week and THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch yourself!


It’s Official: A-Rod Now a Trophy Wife – “Men, the New Women” Alert

By Debbie Schlussel
arodwojciki

A-Rod & His New SugarDaddy Anne Wojciki
You may think this is a trivial topic. But when a multi-zillionaire playboy pro athlete voluntarily assumes the position and becomes a trophy wife, you know that America has collectively lost its collective balls.
Sometimes I get sick of writing about ISIS, Islam, amnesty, and the Presidential race. And many times discussion of other things–changing American lifestyle cues–gives us a much bigger clue of why we are losing America. This is one of those times.
A-Rod f/k/a Alex Rodriguez used to be a ‘roid-using, masculine Major League Baseball player who liked to “date” (euphemism) hot blonde actress types. Kate Hudson, Cameron Diaz, Madonna (okay, not hot, but still peroxided blonde), etc.
But, now, Rodriguez, wealthier than most with a net worth of $252 million, is the new trophy wife/bimbo for ex-Mrs. Google, billionaire Anne Wojciki, who is, well, um . . . not hot. Not super-ugly, but nothing special. As they say, “she has a GREAT personality.” Pointing this out is not a mere shallow, sexist, Mean Girls observation. It’s an observation of a trend: formerly masculine men who could have anyone . . . willingly assuming the position of the gold-digging chick. (Maybe the ‘roid damage to a certain region was permanent?)
Follow Me on Twitter . . .
And like most gold-digger chicks, A-Rod is now dating the unattractive woman in this relationship strictly because of the size of her wallet. That’s sad. Men used to be men. Especially pro athlete men. No longer. If A-Rod is doing it, a ton of less wealthy men are doing it: transforming into the chick in the relationship and dating women for their money. He went from alpha male to beta girlfriend. Men–The New Women. It’s never a good thing when American culture delves deeper and deeper into the the feminizing of men and the masculinization of women.
You know what they say about the power of the purse strings. I don’t care what you say about the liberation of men and women in relationships where the woman makes or has more money than the man. Thou doth protest too much. It’s all BS. There is no such thing as egalitarianism in romantic relationships. One party always has more power than the other–the upper hand. And that party is almost always the one with more money. It’s just the way it works in our society.
So, basically, A-Rod has ceded that power. He’s now the Mr. Mom to ex-Mrs. Google. Nobody knows just how much exactly Wojciki, recent ex of Google founder Sergey Brin, is worth. But the new divorcee is certainly a billionaire. At the time of her divorce (which was finalized last year), the Brins were worth about $30 billion. It’s a good bet that she got a significant fraction of that.
Yup, A-Rod picked one of the few women in the world who would have the power of having more money than A-Rod. That’s what a guy who’s given up his testicles does. Or a broken man. Or a liberal wimp proud of being a vegan Mr. Mom who knits with the LGBTQABCDEF knitting community.
And if multi-millionaire A-Rod is willing to give up his masculinity and being a man in exchange for the company and wallet of an unattractive rich lady, it’ll take a lot less to lead regular guys to do the same. Men used to “keep women.” Now, they want to be the kept . . . and, frankly, they want to be the women. We’ll see this more and more as economic and employment situations continue to get worse and those of women continue to get better.
While that’s going on, ISIS and Al-Qaeda are laughing at us all the way to the next terrorist attack.
It’s not just A-Rod who eagerly gave up his balls. It’s America, too.
Hint: you never saw Bin Laden dating a chick richer than himself. And you won’t see Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi doing that either. Just sayin’.
***
Yeah, it would be nice if we lived in a world where people weren’t so vain and didn’t judge people by their looks. But we don’t. We live in the world that is more shallow, vain, and looks-focused than ever. So, don’t romanticize A-Rod’s relationship with this plain Jane billionaire chick as “awww, love before looks.” That ain’t what’s happenin’ here. A-Rod has a track record of only “dating’ (euphemism) lookers. And now he’s playing the hooker.
Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly
    
 

Monday, April 4, 2016

Top Ally of Hillary Clinton Can’t Name a Single Accomplishment

An interesting story from www.lifenews.com about Hillary Clinton. This follows this post about the Chair of the Democratic Party. For two very interesting books click HERE.
Please follow me here.

It may be time for U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein to retire. She is making her fellow pro-abortion legislators look bad.

Even the liberal mainstream media couldn’t give the California Senator a pass earlier this week when she struggled to mention even one accomplishment of her favorite presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton.
During an interview with The San Francisco Chronicle on Tuesday, Feinstein was asked to name one of Clinton’s signature accomplishments during her time in the U.S. Senate, according to the Free Beacon.
“Golly, I forget what bills she’s been part of or authored,” Feinstein told the newspaper’s editorial board.
Feinstein, who recently endorsed Clinton for president, told the newspaper that she was caught off guard by the question.
“I didn’t really come prepared to discuss this,” she said. “But she’s been a good senator. There are things outside of bills that you can do, and I know that she’s done them for her state.”
According to the report, Feinstein then directed an aid to “get on Google” and find some of Clinton’s accomplishments.
But, the Free Beacon noted, Clinton had very few accomplishments during her tenure in the Senate from 2001 to 2009:
Feinstein, who was elected in 1992, said that Clinton did not work in the Senate long enough “to achieve the degree of seniority that affords her the ability to do more.” The California lawmaker did argue that Clinton helped New York City secure $20 billion to rebuild after the 9/11 terror attacks.
SIGN THE PLEDGE! We Oppose Hillary Clinton!
During her eight years in Congress, three bills that Clinton sponsored became law. The statutes were noncontroversial and established a historic site, a post office, and highway in New York. Clinton also cosponsored 74 bills that ultimately became law.
Feinstein meanwhile authored and passed the 1994 assault weapons ban within the first two years of her time in the Senate, The Chronicle noted.
Feinstein’s comments did what the mainstream media often fails to do – expose the truth about Clinton’s record. They have consistently given Clinton a pass on her radical stance on abortion which is out of touch with most Americans, while attacking pro-life candidates.
If elected, Clinton has promised to overturn the Hyde Amendment, forcing Americans to fund abortions with tax dollars; and she openly opposes restrictions on late-term abortions when babies are viable outside the womb. Most Americans don’t stand with Clinton on these issues.
Feinstein, too, has a radical pro-abortion position. Feinstein voted against partial birth abortion bans in 1995, 1997, 2000, and 2003. Likewise, Clinton defended partial-birth abortion earlier this year in an interview.
hillaryclinton34

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Obama Administration stonewalling investigation into 113 terrorists inside US

A timely post about from http://www.jihadwatch.org about Islamic terrorists in the U.S. This follows this post about coverage of Syrian refugees. This follows this post about Roman Catholics and Islam. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.You can follow me here.


Obama Administration stonewalling investigation into 113 terrorists inside US

What could possibly go wrong, you greasy Islamophobe?
obama-shhh1
“Obama Admin Stonewalling Investigation Into 113 Terrorists Inside United States,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, January 11, 2016:
Leading senators on Monday petitioned multiple Obama administration agencies to stop stonewalling a congressional investigation into the immigration histories of at least 113 foreign-born individuals implicated in terrorist operations after legally entering the United States, according to a copy of the letters.
The latest investigation comes just days after the Washington Free Beacon disclosed that an additional 41 foreign-born individuals who legally entered the United States had been arrested for planning a number of terror attacks.
Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) disclosed Monday that they had been pressuring the Obama administration for months to disclose the immigration histories of these foreign-born individuals implicated in terror plots.
Agencies including the Departments of State and Homeland Security have stonewalled these efforts, declining since mid-2015 to provide Congress additional information. This move has prompted speculation among lawmakers that the administration is withholding information to prevent the exposure of major gaps in the U.S. screening process for new immigrants.
“The American people are entitled to information on the immigration history of terrorists seeking to harm them,” Cruz and Sessions wrote to the secretaries of State and Homeland Security and the attorney general.
Similar requests for information issued sent in August and again in December have not been answered by the administration
The letter cites a recent Free Beacon report detailing that an additional 41 foreign-born individuals had been snagged on terrorism-related charges since 2014. The disclosure of these previously unknown accused terrorists brings the total number of foreigners brought up on terrorism charges to 113.
Sessions and Cruz note that at least 14 of those foreigners accused of terrorism were granted legal entrance to the United States as refugees.
“Many more came through other immigration programs,” they wrote. “A number of immigrant terrorists were even approved for citizenship. Others are the U.S.-born children of foreign migrants whose presence in the country would not be possible but for the immigration of their parents.”
Many of these recently implicated foreigners have been caught by authorities planning terrorist attacks on American soil, while others were found to be involved in efforts to provide funding and material to ISIS, according to an internal list of migrant terrorists codified by congressional sources and viewed by the Free Beacon.
Cruz and Sessions are requesting that the agencies in question fill out a chart that includes only partial information about the 113 accused terrorists.
A senior congressional aide familiar with the investigation said the soaring rate of immigration is taking a toll on the U.S. security establishment.
“The cost of high rates of Muslim immigration are clear: enormous security challenges combined with vast expenses to track and convict those here attempting to wound Americans,” the source said….
Cologne: Welcome party for migrants turned into mass groping
Pakistani boy cuts off his own hand after accidentally committing "blasphemy"
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Friday, July 24, 2015

The Cities Americans Are Ditching”…Are The Ones With The Most Immigration

A timely post about from www.debbieschlussel.com about immigration and population. This follows this post about Harper Lee's new book. This follows this post about Pope Francis turning LEFT.
You can follow me here.

The Cities Americans Are Ditching”…Are The Ones With The Most Immigration

From Bloomberg:
These Are the Top 20 Cities Americans Are Ditching
Soaring costs of living meant residents left New York City and its suburbs in droves
by Erin Roman Wei Lu
July 22, 2015 — 3:00 AM PDT
Some of these cities are just Rust Belt cities in long-term decline, but the others are more interesting:
New York City, Los Angeles, Honolulu: They’re all places you would think would be popular destinations for Americans. So it might come as a surprise that these are among the cities U.S. residents are fleeing in droves.
The map below shows the 20 metropolitan areas that lost the greatest share of local people to other parts of the country between July 2013 and July 2014, according to a Bloomberg News analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data. …
Interestingly, these are also the cities with some of the highest net inflows of people from outside the country. That gives many of these cities a steadily growing population, despite the net exodus of people moving within the U.S.
So what’s going on here? Michael Stoll, a professor of public policy and urban planning at the University of California Los Angeles, has an idea. Soaring home prices are pushing local residents out and scaring away potential new ones from other parts of the country, he said. (Everyone knows how unaffordable the Manhattan area has become.)
And as Americans leave, people from abroad move in to these bustling cities to fill the vacant low-skilled jobs. They are able to do so by living in what Stoll calls “creative housing arrangements” in which they pack six to eight individuals, or two to four families, into one apartment or home. It’s an arrangement that most Americans just aren’t willing to pursue, and even many immigrants decide it’s not for them as time goes by, he said.
This has both a short-term (sojourners) and long-term (clannish cultures) aspect, as I noted in my 2010 review in VDARE of Tory cabinet minister David Willetts’ book The Pinch:
Willetts nicely lays out one reason why the Blair-Brown Bubble in London did so little to alleviate unemployment among young Englishmen in blue collar cities like Liverpool (just as the Bush Bubble in Las Vegas didn’t help American workers in Cleveland, as I pointed out in VDARE.com on July 7, 2006). He writes: “Quite simply, high house prices were one factor sucking in immigrants.”
Willetts observes, “The young man from Liverpool does not see why he should live in more cramped conditions than his family back in Liverpool occupy.” In contrast, the immigrant crams into a house with many others from his country. “His willingness to be under-housed gives him a labour market advantage and it is greater if house prices are higher.” In turn, sucking in immigrants creates a vicious cycle, driving up housing prices, which drives out more natives.
Moreover, remittances sent home from London to Liverpool buy a lot less in Liverpool than remittances sent home to a poor country:
“So it is not that our Liverpudlian is somehow a bad person compared to our Pole. It is that he or she cannot capture similar benefits for their family by under-housing themselves in London.”
Willetts sums up:
“The crucial proposition therefore underlying the economics of immigration in Britain is as follows. The larger the proportion of earnings consumed by housing costs, the greater the benefits of under-housing and the greater the price advantage of immigrant labour. It was not despite the high cost of housing that immigrants came to the house price hotspots in Britain to make a living—it was because of them.”
But, of course, a lot of immigrants who initially assume they’ll just be sojourning in America so they can send home remittances before they make their triumphant return wind up staying here and bringing over their extended families to live with them, crowding out Americans. As I explained:
The [Anglo-American-style] nuclear family is expensive. Each small family wants its own place to live—ideally, a house with a garden. Not surprisingly, the crowded British Isles were long the emigration capital of the world, as people headed out for the emptier lands of America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
Why don’t Anglo-Saxons like to live in large, noisy My Big Fat Greek Wedding-style homes? Unfortunately, Willetts doesn’t address this. Personally, I don`t see much evidence that people from other cultures get along better with their relatives. They just don’t seem to mind screaming at their cousin-in-laws as much as Anglos would mind. …
This relative lack of nepotism and ethnocentrism makes Anglos simultaneously both successful and at risk of being out-maneuvered by less idealistic groups.
The need for a separate home for each nuclear family can put Anglo-derived cultures at a disadvantage in newly cosmopolitan cities. For example, Los Angeles, strange as it may seem now, was largely built in the 20th Century by civil people from rather bland, trusting places such as Iowa, Illinois (where my father is from) and Minnesota (where my late mother grew up).
This causes them and their descendents problems today, in a very expensive city increasingly dominated by newcomers from the more vibrant cultures of the ex-Soviet Union and the Middle East who don’t as much mind crowding in with their in-laws and cutting corners on their taxes.
Bloomberg concludes:
El Paso, Texas, the city that residents fled from at the fastest pace, also saw a surprisingly small number of foreigners settling in given how close it is to Mexico.
“A lot of young, reasonably educated people are having a hard time finding work there,” Stoll said. “They’re not staying in town after they graduate,” leaving for the faster-growing economies of neighboring metro areas like Dallas and Austin, he said.
This is part of a general pattern that highly Mexican areas in America wind up being too economically stagnant to attract more Mexicans: it’s also seen in the Rio Grande Valley and in New Mexico. And some of Connecticut’s problems are due to Puerto Rican areas having stopped attracting Puerto Ricans.
[Comment at Unz.com]

Monday, August 18, 2014

Six-Month Pregnant Woman is the Latest Victim of the “Knockout Game”

An interesting story from www.lifenews.com about the Knockout Game being used on a pregnant woman. This follows this post about pro-abortion groups. This follows this post about abortion in Texas. For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can also get two very interesting books HERE
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.




Six-Month Pregnant Woman is the Latest Victim of the “Knockout Game


by Steven Ertelt | New York, NY | LifeNews.com |
By now, most Americans are familiar with the horrific Knockout Game, a creepy “sport” where people prey on random unsuspencting citizens and attempt to know them out with one sucker punch. The game has become an urban city phenomenon and people have died or been seriously injured in the attacks.
According to the New York Post, the latest victim of the Knockout Game is a woman who is six months pregnant with her unborn child.
The newspaper provides more details and a video is below. Fortunately, neither she nor her unborn baby were killed or inured in this random act of violence.
pregnantwoman12Jannatul Ferdous, a 34-year-old Brooklyn resident who is six months pregnant, was walking down a sidewalk in Bedford-Stuyvesant alongside her sister when Willie Stephens, 33, allegedly sneaked up behind her and socked her in the head around 3:45 p.m. Thursday, sources said.
Ferdous was knocked unconscious during the sudden attack, but neither she nor her child was critically injured.
Ferdous’ sister immediately called the cops and gave them a description of the attacker, who fled. Officers found Stephens three blocks away and arrested him. The alleged assailant, who does not have a criminal record, was charged with assault.
Cops believe the attack could be connected to the “knockout game,” in which criminals try to punch their victims unconscious with a single blow. The attack appeared to be random and officers believe Stephens did not know his victim, sources said.
Ferdous was taken to Woodhull Medical Center in Brooklyn.



Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Your Day in Muslim Immigration: New York Paki Murders Wife Over Veggie Meal Instead of Halal Meat; Lawyer Argues “Beating Women Custom in Paki”

A very interesting post from www.debbieschlussel.com about a Muslim who murdered his wife in the U.S. This follows this post about the Muslim takeover of a city in New Jersey. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more about what you can do to get more involved click here and you can read two very interesting books HERE. You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!




Your Day in Muslim Immigration: New York Paki Murders Wife Over Veggie Meal Instead of Halal Meat; Lawyer Argues “Beating Women Custom in Paki”



By Debbie Schlussel
Time for another edition of “GUESS. THE. RELIGION.” Or “Your Day in Islam.” I think I have a great new advertising slogan for “comprehensive immigration reform”: Muslim immigration . . . Yeah, we need more of that. Great tag line for stories like this:
noorhussainislamiccrescent.jpg

A Pakistani immigrant beat his wife to death in their Brooklyn home after she made the mistake of cooking him lentils for dinner instead of the hearty meal of goat meat that he craved, according to court papers. Noor Hussain, 75, was so outraged over the vegetarian fare that he pummeled his wife, Nazar Hussain, 66, with a stick until she was a “bloody mess,” according to prosecutors and court papers. “Defendant asked [his wife] to cook goat and [his wife] said she made something else,” the court papers indicated as Hussain’s murder trial opened on Wednesday.













“The conversation got louder and [his wife] disrespected defendant by cursing at defendant and saying motherf-?-ker, and . . . defendant took a wooden stick and hit her with it on her arm and mouth.” Defense attorney Julie Clark admitted Hussain beat his wife — but argued that he is guilty of only manslaughter because he didn’t intend to kill her. In Pakistan, Clark said, beating one’s wife is customary.“He comes from a culture where he thinks this is appropriate conduct, where he can hit his wife,” Clark said in her opening statements at the Brooklyn Supreme Court bench trial. “He culturally believed he had the right to hit his wife and discipline his wife.”
Let’s hear it for Muslim culture! And immigration to America.
Reader Worry01: “Islamic family values.”
Muslim immigration . . . Yeah, we need more of that.
New Twitter hashtag: #bringbackmywifewhomImurderedoverlentilsbecausemyculturesaysitsokay
Think it’ll work? Nah.
***
By the way, this is the kind of story that the idiots from PETA (or as we call it here, PUTAh–People for the Unethical Treatment of Animals and humans) would take and completely ignore the Muslim angle. I can just here it now: meat = murder.







Friday, February 7, 2014

Black New York City Rapists are on the Hunt for White and Asian Victims

A timely post about from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com about rape statistics in New York City. This follows this post about the House GOP's next move.  In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.


Black New York City Rapists are on the Hunt for White and Asian Victims
By Nicholas Stix

For a generation, we have been told the Big Lie about black crime: That it primarily victimizes other blacks. That stopped being true officially around 1987—unofficially, it had probably been true since at least the 1960s—and ever since then, every year, blacks have victimized more whites than other blacks, even with police discouraging at least half of white crime victims from reporting black-on-white crime.

In 1999, the statistician who writes under the nom de guerre La Griffe du Lion argued that, given that most whites and blacks live in separate neighborhoods, and the rule of thumb is that criminals prefer to victimize those nearest to them, “Only a hunter's mentality could account for the data.”

[“Crime in the Hood,” La Griffe du Lion, November 1999.]

In recent years—i.e., under the “Obama” tyranny—the feds have taken to making mischief with the interracial rape stats, so as to make them worthless. They have filled them with N/As, where they used to have numbers, so as to make it impossible to determine the situation.

Well, apparently, New York City, which until New Year’s Day, was under Republican/transpolitical rule for 20 years, did not (yet) get the memo.

Although most New York City black criminals live in black or black-and-Hispanic neighborhoods, they are leaving those neighborhoods to rape non-black women.

From 2008-2012,
Blacks were 31.6 percent of rape victims and 71.02 percent of rape suspects.

[“DEATH WISH at Forty: Are We Allowed to 'Notice' Race Now?,” by Paul Kersey, VDARE, February 4, 2014 at 10:29 p.m.]
By my reckoning, that means that blacks in New York City are raping non-blacks 55.5 percent of the time. Since blacks know that messing with Spanish women will bring deadly consequences, my hunch is that they are targeting white and Asian women. Black men’s obsession with white women is legendary.

La Griffe du Lion again,
The observed level of white victimization is much too high to blame on general tendencies of blacks to be violent. A more important reason is simply that blacks prefer white victims.

In 2007, the late, lamented Larry Auster discussed a 1982 interview that the late, unlamented David Mills (Undercover Blackman) had conducted with Eldridge Cleaver.
Now it turns out that David Mills, who has repeatedly portrayed me as some race-obsessed sicko for writing that black rapists target white women, conducted an interview with Eldridge Cleaver in 1982, published at Mills’s website, in which Cleaver discussed his career of raping white women and said that there was a lot of denial of the reality of black-on-white rape:

MILLS: When you came out after that first term, you spent about a year on the outside before your second conviction. And during that time, as you revealed in “Soul on Ice,” you set about raping white women as a principle of black rebellion [N.S.: Read black supremacism].

CLEAVER: I wrote this in prison. And I wrote this because I was trying to describe my own feelings, my own attitudes, and the attitudes of a lot of black men. At that time, this was something that was not really written about, talked about. It was kind of scandalous. There was a lot of denial in blacks who had these feelings.

MILLS: What feelings? Sexual attraction to white women?

CLEAVER: People used to deny that. The whole phenomenon was raging at that time because this whole black consciousness thing was coming in, interracial relationships were rising.

One of the old bugaboos of race relations in America has been black rape. It has been a big problem down through history and continues to be a problem. For my own part, I think there is often a lot of denial in that. But I think the facts will support a case that there is quite a bit of black rape.

Auster: There are three things established from the above interview and from the Cleaver quote in the previous blog entry:

• Cleaver raped white women in order to defile them and thus get revenge on the white race.

• Cleaver raped white women because he was attracted to them, and he says that other black rapists of white women have the same motive, and that there is a lot of denial about this.

• Cleaver says that because of the attraction of black men to white women, “there is quite a bit of black rape [of white women],” though “there is often a lot of denial” about that as well.


[“Eldridge Cleaver told David Mills the same things about black-on-white rape that I said in my article,” by Lawrence Auster, View from the Right, May 16, 2007.]
Rape is one of the weapons of war. We see this in the jihad that Moslems are waging in the British Isles, and every European country they have invaded. Blacks have been waging a race war on whites in America for generations.

Thursday, January 23, 2014

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo Declared New York State a Disaster Area, but was Overruled by Dante DeBlasio, Who Declared that New York City’s Public Schools Will be Open Today

A timely post about from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com about the dispute rift between Andrew Cuomo and Bill De Blasio. This follows this post about the Barrio Azteca gang in El Paso and Juarez. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.




New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo Declared New York State a Disaster Area, but was Overruled by Dante DeBlasio, Who Declared that New York City’s Public Schools Will be Open Today


By Nicholas Stix

Dante DeBlasio is the 15-year-old son of Mayor Bill Wilhelm Jr./DeBlasio. Dante’s shtick was tired when it was new. He is not cute or charming, let alone “charismatic,” as at least one sycophantic MSM “reporter” put it.

Dante DeBlasio gets driven to school by at least one heavily armed NYPD officer in a cozy, limousine that I pay for. By contrast, I have to take my son to school on a city bus driven by a racist black man, after waiting on a street corner in the cold.

Like hundreds of thousands of other parents, I will be keeping my son home from school today. What the Wilhelm/DeBlasios will be doing with Dante is anyone’s guess, as if any sensible person would care.