Showing posts with label Abu Dhabi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abu Dhabi. Show all posts

Friday, September 25, 2015

Why Arab Muslims refuse Arab Muslim ‘refugees’

A timely post from www.jihadwatch.org about Arab Muslims and Arab Muslim refugees. This follows this post about Roman Catholicism. This follows this post about Mexico.
You can follow me here.

Why Arab Muslims refuse Arab Muslim ‘refugees’

While the West goes out of its way to accommodate Muslim migrants — still called “refugees” though most are not even from war torn Syria and some are Islamic State jihadis — an Arab Muslim from Kuwait recently explained why his nation refuses to take any.
Fahd al-Shalami
According to Kuwait’s Fahd al-Shalami, Chairman of the Gulf Forum for Peace and Security, Kuwait refuses to take Arab/Muslim refugees because, “In the end, you cannot accept other people — from a different background, from another place, who have psychological or neurological problems, or trauma — and just bring them into your society.”
Such are the words of an Arab Muslim concerning fellow Arab Muslims — the same ones the West is eager to accommodate.
Imagine the more commonsensical reasons Shalami could’ve given if Kuwait were not Islamic, and those trying to enter it were screaming Islamic supremacist slogans — as they do in the West?
Hungarian bishop: Pope wrong in appealing for aid to sea of refugees; this is actually a Muslim invasion of Europe

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

2015 - A Year of Triumph or Trial for America?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the U.S. and the Middle East. This follows this post about about religious libery. This follows this post about Iran. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
I am leaving TWITTER SOON. Please continue to follow me here.


2015 - A Year of Triumph or Trial for America?




After years of bad economic news, some think things are looking up for the United States. But are they? What troubling signs are on the horizon?

A man holding an American flag flapping in the wind.
Has America passed, or is it about to pass, that point of no return?

Source: Chandler Erisman/Snapwiresnaps
Millions of Americans have seen reasons to believe that 2015 is on track to being better than recent years. Economic forecasts are up. Crime is down. Lower oil prices translate into hundreds of dollars more per year in consumers’ pockets.
Yet while this is all good, should we also be paying attention to troubling signs on the horizon?
To be sure, some signs do indeed look promising. After the economic crisis of 2008-2009 and several years of sluggish recovery, U.S. economists are nearly unanimous in the estimates of robust economic growth in 2015, with most expecting 3 percent or greater.
This would translate into more good news for the job market. The unemployment rate is expected to continue to decline, with tens of thousands of new jobs created each month. And the gradual tightening of the labor force should give U.S. workers more leverage in wage negotiations, finally driving up wages that have been stagnant for years.
A solid growth rate should also translate into stock and bond market gains, as an improving economy translates into higher earnings for companies. A growing economy would prompt the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates, which would help bond investors.
As mentioned, the nation can take some satisfaction in an improved crime situation. Federal Bureau of Investigation figures show a striking but positive trend: The rate of violent crime has dropped by nearly half since 1993. FBI data shows a decline in violent crime from a rate of 747 incidents per 100,000 in 1993 to 387 incidents per 100,000 in 2012, the most recent year for which complete data has been published.
Nearly every type of violent crime declined over the past 20 years, with homicides down 51 percent, forcible rape down 35 percent and robberies down 56 percent. Property crimes, such as burglary and vandalism, also dropped sharply.
Some U.S. cities are the safest they’ve been in decades. New York City of the 1970s was considered one of the most crime-infested cities in the nation. Since that time, however, the city’s crime rate has plummeted to where it is now considered safer than Dallas or Houston (Justin Wolfers, “Perceptions Haven’t Caught Up to Decline in Crime,” The New York Times , Sept. 16, 2014).
The good news is something to rejoice about. But before we start celebrating too loudly, we should ask ourselves: Are we seeing the complete picture? Or could we be closing our eyes to dangers we’d rather not think about?

Not-so-rosy economic figures

While some economic figures are encouraging, a number of others are highly sobering. For example, a Jan. 13, 2015, report by Jim Clifton, CEO of Gallup, Inc., noted at the Gallup website that over the last six years, 70,000 more businesses have shut their doors than have opened.
He went on to explain: “When new businesses aren’t being born, the free enterprise system and jobs decline . . . Without a growing entrepreneurial economy, there are no new good jobs. That means declining revenues and smaller salaries to tax, followed by declining aid for the elderly and poor and declining funding for the military, for education, for infrastructure—declining revenues for everything.”
Going hand-in-hand with this, a New York Times article last year reported that over the previous decade, “the inflation-adjusted net worth for the typical household” had declined 36 percent (Anna Bernasek, “The Typical Household, Now Worth a Third Less,” July 26, 2014).
A Jan. 16, 2015, Washington Post article noted the following shocking fact: “For the first time in at least 50 years, a majority of U.S. public school students come from low-income families . . . a statistic that has profound implications for the nation”(Lyndsey Layton, “Majority of U.S. Public School Students Are in Poverty”).
Further, a CNSnews.com headline on Dec. 10, 2014, stated, “65 Percent of Children Live in Households on Federal Aid Programs.” The total number, according to U.S. Census Bureau figures, was more than 40 million.
Especially troubling is the skyrocketing U.S. government debt. According to the U.S. Treasury website, as of Jan. 1, 2005, total federal debt was just under $7.6 trillion. A decade later, at the beginning of 2015, debt stood at more than $18 trillion —a staggering increase of almost 140 percent, and more debt than the nation had accumulated in its entire previous history of almost 230 years!
Sadly, such figures are the tip of the iceberg in terms of the nation’s true financial picture. Making matters worse, on Feb. 2 President Obama presented a proposed 2016 fiscal year budget that would add another $1.44 trillion in taxes and another $6 trillion in debt over the next decade.

An island in a sea of turmoil

In spite of its financial problems, America could be likened to an island of relative peace and tranquility in a seething cauldron of worldwide unrest, where violence and hatred seem to be escalating everywhere.
The new year was barely one week old when two French-born Islamic terrorists of Algerian descent, brothers Cherif and Said Quache, stormed into the Paris offices of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on Jan. 7. Using automatic weapons with military precision, they gunned down 10 journalists and cartoonists, plus two policemen.
As they murdered a wounded Muslim policeman they shouted, “The prophet has been avenged!” Apparently they thought it was their Muslim duty to avenge any insult to the founder of Islam.
The murders had a chilling effect on press freedom, long a core belief of Western democracies. Major news organizations immediately began rethinking their editorial policies. At CNN, senior editorial director Richard Griffiths told staffers worldwide that Charlie Hebdo cartoons were not being shown on any CNN platforms, encouraging them instead to “verbally describe the cartoons in detail” (quoted at Politico, Jan. 7, 2015).
The Islamist terror organization al-Qaeda’s affiliate group in Yemen took responsibility for the Paris killings, which the French now refer to as their 9/11. Al-Qaeda has shown its ability to strike the major Western democracies, with nearly 3,000 killed in the 9/11 attacks on America in 2001 and 52 in England with the 2005 London subway bombings.
The sensational news of the attacks in France overshadowed other terrorist incidents that day—suicide bombings in Iraq that killed 23 people and a car bomb in Yemen that killed 38 and injured more than 60 others. These followed attacks in which an estimated 2,000 people were slaughtered by the Islamist group Boko Haram in northern Nigeria Jan. 3.
Very few realize that the Bible sitting on their bookshelf has something to say about these events. Speaking through Moses, God foretold events that would befall ancient Israel—and its modern-day descendants, particularly the major English-speaking peoples—for national rejection of His law:
“But if you will not listen to Me, and will not do all these commandments, and if you shall despise My statutes, or if your soul hates My judgments . . . I will even appoint terror over you, consumption, and burning fever, consuming the eyes and causing sorrow of heart . . . And I will set My face against you, and you shall be slain before your enemies”(Leviticus:26:14-17, Modern King James Version, emphasis added throughout).
Could it be that we’re seeing these ominous punishments begin to be played out in America today? What do such growing trends portend for the nation’s future?

Failing schools reduce national competitiveness

For the past few decades, America’s failing educational institutions have been an embarrassment to the nation and a blot on its national pride.
A recent Washington Times article described American public schools as “in a free fall,”with U.S. schools now ranking 29th in the world. This from the nation that earlier put man on the moon and has for decades led the world in finding cures for killer diseases.
Slovakia, Russia and Vietnam have joined the ranks of China, India, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea in the list of nations surpassing U.S. schools in the quality of education and the caliber of its graduates.
And now comes evidence that many American college graduates lack the skills to compete even in an average U.S. work environment. In mid-January, The Wall Street Journal reported that as many as four in ten U.S. graduates lack the reasoning skills to manage white-collar work.
The Collegiate Learning Assessment Plus exam, given to 32,000 college seniors at 169 U.S. colleges and universities, measures reasoning ability needed in typical U.S. managerial environments. It noted that many students start college at a deficit in reasoning, making it that much harder to catch up by the time they graduate.
“‘Even if there is notable growth over four years, many students are starting at such a low point that they may still not be proficient at the point of graduation,’ said Jessalyn James, a program manager at the Council for Aid to Education, which administered the test” (Douglas Belkin , “Test Finds College Graduates Lack Skills for White-Collar Jobs,” The Wall Street Journal , Jan. 16, 2015).
The implications for an America competing in a global economy could be disastrous. As nations such as China and India graduate more trained engineers, scientists, business managers and computer experts, American competitiveness will suffer.

Alarming increase in mental illness

Not well publicized is the dramatic rise of mental illness in America today. No less an authority than Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, had this to say in a June 23, 2011, New York Review of Books piece titled “The Epidemic of Mental Illness: Why?”:
“The tally of those who are so disabled by mental disorders that they qualify for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) increased nearly two and a half times between 1987 and 2007 —from 1 in 184 Americans to 1 in 76. For children, the rise is even more startling— a thirty-five-fold increase in the same two decades.”
Today, young people by the millions are experiencing the onset of clinical depression, among the most debilitating of mental illnesses resulting in thousands of suicides annually. Speaking to the National Press Club in 1998, Martin Seligman, then-president of the American Psychological Association, reported that the average age for the onset of depression had decreased from 29 to 15.
Antidepressant use in the United States has increased nearly 400 percent in the last two decades, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), making antidepressants the most frequently used class of medications by Americans ages 18-44. By 2008, 23 percent of women ages 40-59 were taking antidepressants, the CDC reported.
It seems every other person in the country is on some type of antidepressant these days. What does it portend for America’s future with depression and other mental illnesses on the rise?
And how much of this may be attributed to a sobering prophecy that applies to our time today found in Deuteronomy:28:28? Speaking to the ancient Israelites—and their modern-day descendants—about the consequences of disobedience to His law, God tells them, “The Lord will strike you with blindness and madness and confusion of heart.”

Rising racial tensions creating a divided nation

The election of Barack Obama as the first African-American president brought hope to millions that race relations in America would enter the final stage of healing, marking the start of a new era in the nation.
That optimism soon vanished. Annual Wall Street Journal/ NBC News polls show that positive views of race relations peaked among African Americans at 66 percent in 2010, one year after Obama took office. Then opinions took a steady downturn so that by July 2013 only 38 percent thought race relations were good—worse than the 40 percent in 2007 before Obama.
Perceptions of race relations dropped even lower with the highly publicized 2014 killings of two black men by white police officers, one in Ferguson, Missouri, and the other in New York City, along with grand juries in both cases deciding not to indict the officers. In another Wall Street Journal/ NBC poll in mid-December 2014, only 35 percent of African-American respondents rated race relations as good, while 63 percent rated them as bad.
The change in perceptions among white Americans was even more dramatic, having risen from 59 percent seeing race relations as good in 2007 to a peak of 79 percent considering them so in late 2009 and then plunging to only 40 percent now feeling this way, as of December 2014 (Reid Epstein, “Poll: Views of Race Relations Worse Than Before Obama Took Office,” Washington Wire, blogs.wsj.com, Dec. 17, 2014)
It would seem that America’s long-running racial divisions have not improved nearly as much as we would have expected since the early 1960s civil rights struggles. This does not bode well for the future of the country. As Jesus Christ Himself stated, “Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand” (Matthew:12:25, New International Version).
Certainly, the U.S. is not the only nation with significant gulfs between racial groups. But we could ask ourselves to what extent will smoldering racial tensions lead to the weakening of the world’s leading democracy?

How much longer?

Some will point out that America has faced crises before. One can’t forget the grim situation the nation faced in the 1930s, when worldwide economic depression crippled the U.S. economy with 25 percent unemployment in 1933. The nation came through a decade later when, roused from isolationist slumber by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, it mobilized its human and material resources to defeat the Axis powers.
But other observers also correctly point out the differences in the character of the American people then compared to today. With the nation’s flagrant disregard for morality and God’s righteous law, does America have what it takes to pull through today’s challenges?
Moses’ warning to ancient Israel is especially relevant to 21st-century America. Read it in Deuteronomy 28, where God promised blessings for obedience and curses for violating His laws. God dealt patiently with ancient Israel, and He will deal patiently with us today—but only to a point. Has America passed, or is it about to pass, that point of no return?
Individually, none of us can change the course of a nation bent on increasingly turning away from God. But each of us can personally heed God’s command given through the prophet Isaiah: “Seek the Lord while He may be found, call upon Him while He is near. Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts; let him return to the Lord, and He will have mercy on him; and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon” (Isaiah:55:6-7).
May we have the wisdom to turn from our human ways that lead to suffering and death (Proverbs:14:12; Proverbs:16:25) and choose, as we’re told to in Deuteronomy:30:19, the way that leads to blessings and life!

Monday, April 6, 2015

Wknd Box Office: Woman in Gold, Furious 7, Danny Collins

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post about some of the movies from last week and THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch yourself!

Wknd Box Office: Woman in Gold, Furious 7, Danny Collins


By Debbie Schlussel
Well, the movies are getting semi-better ahead of the big movie season in May.
womaningoldfurious7

dannycollins

* “Woman In Gold: I enjoyed this entertaining legal thriller based on real-life history. Read my complete review of the movie, about a Holocaust survivor’s fight to get back the paintings the Nazis stole from her family.
FOUR REAGANS
reagancowboyreagancowboyreagancowboyreagancowboy
* “Furious 7“: This latest installment of the Fast & Furious movies is much better than the last one. The story is a little bit confusing and entirely ridiculous, but nobody goes to see these movies for a story or a plot, so my review is based on this movie delivering what you’d expect of it: non-stop action and car chases, very cool special effects, and entirely amazing (and not believable) stunts. On those, it delivers, though it’s kind of ridiculous: cars parachuting out of planes and landing on Caucasus Mountains roads with barely a scratch (ditto for the Furious 7 characters driving those cars); an exotic car driving high above Abu Dhabi through three sky scrapers; etc. Although star Paul Walker (read my expose on his “charity”) died before finishing filming of this movie, it’s hard to tell. His lookalike brothers provide side glances and distant shots, and there is a tribute to him at the end, showing shots from his previous Fast & Furious stints.
I didn’t need to see multiple shots of women’s rear ends right in my face (though that is often a Fast & Furious staple). And I had misgivings about the movie’s promotion of the Arab Muslim Gulf as a hip, happening place where anything goes. This is, after all, the same Abu Dhabi in which people have been arrested and sent to jail for making out on the beach. On the other hand, the scene in which a Jordanian prince is celebrating his birthday complete with bare-assed women and alcohol is accurate. They are hypocrites who preach one thing to their fellow Muslims and to us, but then do the opposite. Sadly, that point wasn’t made in this movie. Instead, Black star Tyrese comments about how much fun he’s having at the party, and that he’s come up with a new word, “Blarab”–short for Black Arab. I have an older, more accurate name for Black Arab: SLAVE, ‘cuz that’s what they are in most of the Arab world. It was nice, though, to see the Fast & Furious gang outsmart and beat up all the Arab Muslim bodyguards, many of them wearing hijabs, and ruin the Jordanian prince’s birthday bash.








The “story”: the Fast & Furious crew are terrorized by Jason Statham (the tired, old “former special forces assassin as bad guy” narrative), whose brother they put in the hospital. They are trying to fight back and stop him, when they are approached by a mysterious pseudo-governmental operative, played by Kurt Russell. He says he’ll help them if they help him get back a computer programmer/hacker and her program, “G-d’s Eye,” which can help the government find anyone using everyone else’s cellphone microphones and cameras. They agree, and the chase takes them to Azerbaijan (the Caucasus Mountains), Abu Dhabi, and back to Los Angeles. It bothered me that in at least one scene, a police car is blown up (and its passengers and driver likely died) in the wreckage of their fight with Jason Statham. It’s supposed to be no big deal.
In any event, the movie delivers on what Fast & Furious movies promise: lots of fast, cool, expensive, luxury cars, lots of action and amazing stunts, and little in the way of story.
TWO REAGANS
reagancowboyreagancowboy
Watch the trailer . . .

* “Danny Collins“: I had mixed feelings about this movie. I hated the main character, rock/pop star Danny Collins, played by Al Pacino (plus listening to Al Pacino sing is like hearing lambs being beheaded–very disturbing). Also, I think John Lennon is an overrated nothing, and this movie makes him into some sort of inspirational god, which I didn’t like. And the movie was a little too melodramatic for me. But it was entertaining and moves along. And the plot was slightly interesting.
The story: Collins is a pop star a la Neil Diamond (his big hit, “Hey, Baby Doll” sounds a lot like “Sweet Caroline”). He’s old and his fans are aging and very old. He’s very rich but hates that he got rich from singing commercial pop song drivel that he despises. He started out as a more soulful singer with folk song-esque sound. Collins is also a pig, with nothing to like about him. He’s a cokehead and a drunk with several ex-wives and a current girlfriend who could be his granddaughter. (I could have done without the gratuitous shot of the woman completely naked with just a little soap covering her vaginal area.)
For his birthday, Collins’ manager (Christopher Plummer) presents him with a letter from John Lennon to Collins. Collins had never seen or been aware of the letter before and is suddenly inspired to change his life. It’s not clear why. The letter merely tells Collins that Lennon likes his songs and would like to talk to him about possibly helping him. It includes a phone number. That’s it. Nothing that inspirational, not that the love-in leftist dope addict has ever done anything too meaningful.
So, Collins decides to stop doing drugs and moves to a Hilton in New Jersey, where he has an adult son, in whose life Collins has never been. We learn that the son (Bobby Cannavale) is the product of a backstage sex session Collins had with a groupie and that the mother of this son kept the news from Collins. When Collins found out he had a son and tried to connect with him by contributing money and so on, the mother refuses and blocks all efforts. Because that’s the case, it’s hard to feel bad for the mother and even more difficult to understand the son’s anger at Collins. Ultimately, though, Collins and his son reconnect, and the movie follows Pacino’s attempts to make up for the past and to connect with people at the Hilton (including the manager, played by Annette Bening).
The movie has its funny lines and moments, and, like I said, it’s entertaining and engrossing. But I just hated the Danny Collins character so much, I just didn’t really care what happened to him and whether or not he betters himself. And, frankly, he lived up (or, rather, down) to my expectations anyway. So, I’m not sure what the point of this was. I don’t think I’d pay ten bucks to see this.
ONE MARX
karlmarxmovies.jpg
Watch the trailer . . .


“Woman In Gold”: Charming, Funny, Touching Movie About Nazi-Looted Art & Getting It Back


By Debbie Schlussel
Helen Mirren should win the Oscar for her portrayal of Maria Altmann in “Woman In Gold,” which debuts in movie theaters today.
womaningold

Whether or not you are into art or history, you will likely enjoy the charming, witty, funny, and touching movie about the real-life Altmann’s fight to get back her family’s beloved painting, stolen by the Nazis during the Holocaust. And, as a practicing attorney, I don’t usually say that movies get it regarding the ups and downs and legal niceties of the courts. This movie does that and more. It’s a thriller, a slice of history, and a study in a nerd–lawyer Randol Schoenberg (Ryan Reynolds), who courageously steps up to the plate–risking everything to do what’s right.
Altmann came from a prominent, wealthy Austrian Jewish family during the Holocaust. She and her opera singer husband escaped and ultimately settled in Los Angeles, but her parents and all of their belongings were taken from them. Among those was a famous painting by renowned artist Gustav Klimt, entitled “Adele Bloch-Bauer I.” The painting, featuring gold paint, is also known as “Lady in Gold.” Adele, the woman in the painting, was Mrs. Altmann’s aunt, and Mrs. Altmann wants the looted painting (and four other looted Klimt paintings owned by her family) back. But Austria and the Austrian gallery that possesses the painting want to keep it. Lawyer Schoenberg is a struggling young lawyer with a new family. He is the grandson of Austrian composer Arnold Schoenberg, and his grandmother and Mrs. Altmann were best friends. At first, he is resistant to taking the daunting case–fighting a foreign government and its army of lawyers, potentially all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court (which is where it ends up). But he takes the case and risks and nearly loses everything to pursue it.
Mirren and Reynolds are great in this movie and they have terrific chemistry in this platonic love story. Her portrayal of a feisty European Jewish woman displaced by the Nazis reminds me of many such women who were friends with my Holocaust survivor grandparents and went to our synagogue. A de-glammed, nerded-up Reynolds is almost unrecognizable and he definitely does well in capturing the nerdy, studious, hungry, underdog lawyer in his portrayal.
The movie flashes back and forth between the past–at the beginning of the Holocaust–and the present, during Altmann’s and Schoenberg’s legal fight, which takes them back and forth to Austria, where they are helped by a young Austrian journalist. The movie makes much of Mrs. Altmann’s old age and that she may not live to see the outcome of her legal fight. And that is clearer in real life. Helen Mirren is 69 years old, but Altmann was nearly 90 when her litigation was resolved.
The flashbacks in the movie accurately capture the attitude of Jews like the Bloch-Bauers. They were JINOs–Jews In Name Only. As wealthy, secular Jews, they mistakenly thought they were part of Austrian high society. They really had little to do with the Jewish religion and were in denial that the Nazis would target them like the other Jews. In fact, as they watch their Jewish friends and neighbors being beaten, humiliated, and otherwise brutalized by the Nazis on a Saturday afternoon (which is the Jewish Sabbath), Maria’s father insists on playing his treasured cello, as he does every Saturday afternoon. As Maria’s uncle–the husband of the woman in the Klimt portrait–warns, they must all leave. When Maria’s father finally faces the music, it is too late for him.
This movie is entertaining, educational, and well done. I wasn’t bored for a second.
Nazis are the betes noires of Hollywood liberal elites, as they should be. I doubt, though, that in 40 years Hollywood will have the courage to show others fighting for the property that the modern-day Nazis–Muslims–looted from them all over the Middle East. I also doubt the courts will find in their favor.
FOUR REAGANS
reagancowboyreagancowboyreagancowboyreagancowboy
Watch the trailer . . .

 

New “Fast & Furious” Flick an Infomercial for Phony $3.4 Million “Muslim SuperCar”

By Debbie Schlussel
Is “Furious 7,” the new Fast & Furious movie, a paid infomercial for the so-called “Arab SuperCar”? It appears so. And that’s in addition to the movie’s pimping of anti-Israel Abu Dhabi, where couples have done jail time for making out on the beach, as a permissive, glamorous playground.
The Muslim Lamborghini Rip-Off Pimped by “Furious 7″ . . .
WMOTORS_LYKAN HYPERSPORT STUDIO 06

Video: Not Much Under The Trunk: The Ultimate Car for the Ultimately Inadequate Man . . .

“Furious 7″ was this past weekend’s predictable runaway winner at movie theaters in the U.S. (with an estimated $144 million take) and around the world (with an estimated $384 million take). In one of the movie’s biggest and most unbelievable stunts, stars Paul Walker and Vin Diesel drive an expensive red sports car through three some of the highest floors of three skyscrapers in Abu Dhabi. Before that happens, though, Walker goes on and on about the car, that it costs $3.4 million, that there are only seven of the cars made in the entire world, and so on. The car looked like a Lamborghini rip-off with Batmobile influences. On my way out of the theater I asked several men who’d attended the screening if they recalled what kind of car it was. Nobody could say.
So, when I got home, I did some research. And it appears that the whole scene–and Paul Walker’s lines in the script having verbal orgasms over this car–were paid product placement by Arab Muslims wishing to establish their sports car as the “Arab [in this case, translation: Muslim] supercar.” The name of the car: the Lykan Hypersport. The Muslims are trying to tell us they can outdo Ferrari, Lamborghini, and so on, and the car has the Arabic version of the number 7 hidden throughout its design (see video below). But some of the features on which the late Paul Walker pimps us in the movie, might not even exist, including the car’s alleged “holographic center display.”
I don’t know about you, but cars aren’t the first thing I think of when I think of the Muslim world. Jew-hatred cartoons and TV shows, beheadings, and IEDs are more of what immediately comes to mind (and more likely what they have in mind). And speaking of Jew-hatred, the Lykan Hypersport’s maker, W Motors is based in Israel-boycotting Dubai. The company’s owner bills it as “the premier Arab Developer of High Performance Luxury Sports Cars.”
More about the pretentious “Arab Supercar”:
It’s a car you’ve likely never heard of before: The Lykan Hypersport, an extremely limited, hyper-expensive supercar. How limited? Just seven examples. How expensive? A mere $3.4 million.Dubai-based W Motors, the company that builds the Lykan, calls itself the first Arab supercar company. Founded by Lebanese-born Ralph Debbas [DS: full name, Ralph R Debbas Sari El Khalil], the W is dedicated to the kind of super-ultimate luxury that only folks with oil-sheik money can dream of.
Inside is where things get really nutzo. As in, seats-stitched-with-gold-thread nutzo. And claimed-holographic-center-display-that-may-not-actually-exist nutzo. And that’s just a part of it. We’re talking a 24-hour concierge service offering on-call engineers and “flying doctors” to cater to the needs of yourself or your car, anywhere in the world.

No word on exactly how much W Motors paid to get this intense marketing push of sharia luxury sports cars in the script of “Furious 7.”
Again, I’m not too concerned that the Arab Muslims are going to be giving Detroit’s Big Three auto companies or the major luxury sports car outfits a run for their money. The Arab and Muslim worlds have only perfected five things: hate, extremism, intolerance, mass violence, and hypocrisy.
But despite what the well-paid Fast & Furious gang wants you to think, none of these is a “luxury supercar.”
This “Furious 7″ trailer, which ran during the Super Bowl shows the Lykan Hypersport “driving” through skyscrapers:

***
By the way, the Gulf State Muslim Arabs did own Aston Martin at one point, as I pointed out on this site (and they drove it into the ground). And the Saudis tried to manufacture their own line of cars, which didn’t really go anywhere. That’s the track record. Terrorism and bombs, on the other hand, they are very successful at.




Friday, October 25, 2013

Rihanna Has an Odd Obsession w Extremist Muslim Garb, Kicked Out of Mosque (Named for Anti-US Jew-Hater) Anyway

A timely post about from www.debbieschlussel.com about Rhianna performing in a Muslim country. This follows this post about a Miley Cyrus Halloween costume. In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.

Rihanna Has an Odd Obsession w Extremist Muslim Garb, Kicked Out of Mosque (Named for Anti-US Jew-Hater) Anyway


By Debbie Schlussel


I’ve written before about pop star Rihanna’s strange obsession with Muslim garb of oppression. It’s especially odd since the woman is overly sexual and Black–two things that are looked down upon in Islam. (Blacks are referred to as “abed” or “abeed”–slave or slaves–in Arabic, the Muslim equivalent of the N-word.) When Rihanna a/k/a Robyn Fenty performed on Saturday Night Live last year, she had her female back-up dancers wear niqabs–the full-Ninja Muslim face veils. And she recently did a dumb photo shoot in full Islamic garb at a mosque in the United Arab Emirates. She was kicked out anyway, probably because she’s Black and Western. They claim the photos, below, are “racy.” Are you kidding me?
By the way, the photos were taken at the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque. Since Sheikh Zayed, the late former Prez of the UAE, was, as I’ve previously noted on this site, a notorious America-hater, anti-Semite, and Holocaust-denier, she should consider being kicked out of the mosque bearing his name to be a great honor. Zayed and his self-funded Zayed Center financed speakers, speaking tours, and publications which engaged in Holocaust-denial, Jew-hatred, anti-Israel BS, and claimed the CIA, Israel, and the Mossad were behind 9/11. (And the Institute also funded Neil Bush, George W. Bush’s loser failed savings-and-loan honcho brother–paying him to speak and providing him with prostitutes, according to his own testimony in his divorce deposition.)
Rihanna brought a little more instability to the Middle East. The “Diamonds” singer was booted from the famed Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque in Abu Dhabi over the weekend after posing for some photos that were racy by the standards of the holy site.


Though she covered up — by her standards — in a head-to-toe black form-fitting outfit, complete with a hijab headcovering, the 25-year-old pop star clearly didn’t get the memo on the spirit of Islamic law. In photos that were posted on her Instagram site, Rihanna could be seen posing in several provocative poses with lips pancaked in ruby red lipstick — a no-no for a society that stresses covering up women’s sexuality.




Baloney. Women all over the Abu Dhabi wear caked on (and ugly) make-up.



“She left without entering the mosque, after being asked to do so, due to the fact that she had taken some pictures that do not conform with the conditions and regulations put in place by the Centre’s management to regulate visits in a way that takes the status and sanctity of the mosque into consideration,” a representative for the mosque told local media outlets in a statement. . . . The mosque spokesperson added that “the singer” came for a private tour to the mosque at a gate that is not meant for visitors — without identifying herself or coordinating the visit in advance. . . .



Rihanna covered up for her concert in the United Arab Emirates’ capital Saturday night — a Bedouin inspired look she dubbed “Empress RiRi.”


Of course she covered up. Pandering to Muslims has no end to it. And it’s all phony. If they were really serious about all this phony modesty, the UAE frauds would have banned Rihanna for her attendance at and disgusting tweets gushing over a live sex show in the Philippines.
Funny how Rihanna doesn’t show this kind of respect and dhimmitude when she’s in the West and offends Christians with her disrobing routines on Christians’ land. Here’s a tip: bend over for Muslims and they’ll slap your ass.
By the way, how did she get into the UAE with an Israeli stamp on her passport? I give her credit for standing up to Muslims when it comes to Israel.
But she should end the Islamo-pandering routine in the Arab Gulf.;