Showing posts with label #rushlimaugh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #rushlimaugh. Show all posts

Friday, August 12, 2016

A Telling Profile of Media Professional's Bias

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about journalists. This follows this post about media bias. This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

The entertainment establishment-writers, producers and stars of the movies, TV programs and music we consume-are overwhelmingly liberal in their political outlook. Not so widely known is that voting patterns of American newspaper reporters and editors show a similar overwhelming lean to the left. Consider these findings:
  • In the 1992 election, 89 percent of journalists who make up the Washington, D.C., press corps and report on national political news voted for the liberal candidate, Democrat Bill Clinton. Only 7 percent voted for the conservative candidate, Republican George H.W. Bush.
  • Of these journalists, 61 percent saw themselves as “liberal” or “liberal to moderate,” while only 9 percent regarded themselves as “conservative” or “moderate to conservative.”
  • A poll of 167 newspaper editors found that, in the 1992 and 1996 elections, 58 and 57 percent, respectively, voted for Democratic candidate Bill Clinton (compared to 43 and 49 percent of all other voters).
  • A 1996 survey of more than 1,000 reporters at 61 newspapers found that, of those with more than 50,000 circulation (primarily large-city papers), 65 percent of the staff members were liberal or leaned to the left.
  • A 2001 poll of more than 300 media professionals found that those who identified themselves as liberal outnumbered conservatives four to one.
  • A 1980 study of 240 New York and Washington journalists found that 86 percent never or seldom attended religious services, and half had no religious affiliation at all.
  • Some 90 percent of these journalists were pro-abortion.
  • About 75 percent did not regard homosexuality as wrong, and 54 percent did not regard adultery as wrong. Only 15 percent of these journalists “strongly agreed” that adultery, abortion and homosexual practices were immoral.
(Sources: William Proctor, The Gospel According to The New York Times , 2000, pp. 44-46; Media Research Center.) GN

You might also be interested in...

Monday, June 6, 2016

Editorial: Battlezone California!!! ***UPDATED***

Editorial

As we ALL saw last week, the so-called "tolerant" LEFT attacked those they disagreed with with eggs, fists, cones, and other unreported objects denying the rights of Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Assembly to Trump Supporters.

Maybe Donald Trump might pick one of these victims to be his vice-president, after all, if someone takes an egg for you, or is bloodied up for you, then that does show they are devoted to you!

However, in regards to these attackers, where is the "tolerance" that they claim to have? Where is the "diversity" of different ideas? Where is the "multiculturalism" towards the culture of their political opponents? Where is the "safe space" Trump supporters deserve? And when will the "microagressions" from the news media's coverage stop??!!

To review what happened, look at these stories:

http://www.vdare.com/posts/anti-trump-fanatics-unleash-violence-again-this-time-in-san-jose-california
http://www.vdare.com/posts/vdare-com-reader-supplies-eye-witness-account-of-anti-trump-riot-and-abc-corroborates

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Limbaugh Goes Bad On Immigration. Again.

An urgent post from http://www.vdare.com/ about Rush Limbaugh's views on immigration. This follows this post about the National E-Verify law, HR 2885. This follows this post about New Mexico's governor attempting to repeal the law allowing illegal immigrants to have drivers licenses. This follows this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants such as the 30,000 openly illegal immigrants in the border town of El Paso, where President Barack Obama recently bashed immigration enforcement!  For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and you can read the very interesting book shown HERE!

And Remember when contacting public officials to please be firm but respectful. Any over the top messages could result in law enforcement action against you. Just let these politicians know that you are aware of what they have done and that you intend to remove them from office in the 2012 elections.



Limbaugh Goes Bad On Immigration. Again.

Blogger's note: you can e-mail Rush Limbaugh at http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/private.guest.html?ck=1291158174592





By Patrick Cleburne on September 21, 2011

My talk-show listening friend just called to say Rush Limbaugh spent much time on his show today demanding that the Immigration issue be not raised in the GOP Presidential contest, apparently claiming that anything but an Hispandering strategy will lose the Republicans Texas.

I gather no dissenting calls were allowed. VDARE.com Request: Would any Patriot seeking to challenge Limbaugh (which very much needs to be done) let us know how they fared with his screeners?

Limbaugh’s defection is not surprising. He dodged the issue for many years – ignoring many efforts by mutual friends to get him to discuss Alien Nation when it was newly published and hotly controversial for example - and has always been subservient to the powerfull.

Peter Brimelow has recalled



"…at Bill Buckley's 1996 Election Night party where Limbaugh was guest of honor...I went up to Limbaugh and directly told him he should change sides on immigration. (The fleeting references I'd heard him make were Wall Street Journal dogmatic drivel.) Limbaugh immediately put on a very serious face and said earnestly: "I've not made up my mind yet"). Some years later, at a dinner party in Palm Beach, I told him the same thing. Again, he put on that serious face and said earnestly: "I've not made up my mind yet." Maybe he gets asked the question a lot.


At this point, I think it's pretty clear Limbaugh is never going to make up his mind. He played a heroic role in helping stop the Bush amnesties, but was noticeably hesitant about the tougher parts of the problem. I don't believe he has ever criticized legal immigration…


I can't really blame Limbaugh for this. He has a big business to run and he's very vulnerable to advertiser pressure. Patriotic immigration reform is simply not good for media careers."


What advertiser - or other - pressure is exerting itself now?

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Health Care Reform Explained




This is the best book to read to explain why government health care reform will ruin health care. Particularly Chapter 3.
You can get it here "Applied Economics."
His recent article about health care is below, but the book is a must read!!
Alice in Medical Care
By Thomas Sowell

Most political and media discussions of medical care have an air of unreality reminiscent of Alice in Wonderland. There is an abundance of catch-phrases but remarkably few coherent arguments.
Let's start at square one. Why is there alarm about American medical care? The most usual reason given is because its cost is high and rising.
That is certainly true. We were not spending nearly as much on high-tech medical procedures in the past because there were not nearly as many of them, and we were not spending anything at all on some of the new pharmaceutical drugs because they didn't exist.

This general pattern is not peculiar to medical care. Cars didn't cost nearly as much in the past, when they didn't have air-conditioning, power steering and high-tech safety features. Homes were cheaper when they were smaller, had fewer bathrooms and lacked such conveniences as built-in microwave ovens.
We would like to have all these things without the rising costs that come with them. But only with medical care is such wishful thinking taken seriously, with government regarded as a sort of fairy godmother who will give us the benefits without the costs.

A cynic is said to be someone who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. If so, then it is political cynicism to point to other countries that spend less on medical care, including some countries where there is "universal health care" provided "free" by their governments.
Just as medical care, houses and cars were all cheaper when they lacked things that they have today, so medical care in other countries is cheaper when they lack many things that are more readily available in the United States.
There are more than four times as many Magnetic Resonance Imaging units (MRIs) per capita in the United States as in Britain or Canada, where there are government-run medical systems. There are more than twice as many CT scanners per capita in the United States as in Canada and more than four times as many per capita as in Britain.
Is it surprising that such things cost money?
The cost of developing a new pharmaceutical drug is now about a billion dollars. Neither political rhetoric nor government bureaucracies will make those costs go away.
We can, of course, refuse to pay these and other medical costs, just as we can refuse to buy air-conditioned homes with built-in microwave ovens. But that just means we pay attention only to prices and not to the value of what we get for those prices.
We can even refuse to pay for so many doctors. But that just means that we will have to wait longer to see a doctor — as people do in countries with government-run medical systems.

In Canada, 27 percent of the people who have surgery wait four months or more. In Britain, 38 percent wait that long. But only 5 percent of Americans wait that long for surgery.
Surgery may well cost less in countries with government-run medical systems — if you count only the money cost, and not the time the patients have to endure the ailments that require surgery, or the fact that some conditions become worse, or even fatal, while waiting.
A recent report from the Fraser Institute in Canada shows that patients there wait an average of ten weeks to get an MRI, just to find out what is wrong with them. A lot of bad things can happen in 10 weeks, ranging from suffering to death.
Politicians may talk about "bringing down the cost of medical care," but they seldom even attempt to bring down the costs. What they bring down is the price — which is to say, they refuse to pay the costs.
Anybody can refuse to pay any cost. But don't be surprised if you get less when you pay less. None of this is rocket science. But it does require us to stop and think before jumping on a bandwagon.
The great haste with which the latest government expansion into medical care is being rushed through Congress suggests that the politicians don't want us to stop and think. That makes sense, from their point of view, but not from ours.