Message To Great Britain: No Membership Will Cost You

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the Brexit vote. This follows this post about Iran. This follows this post about the immigration threat. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

Message To Great Britain

No Membership Will Cost You

 by Darris McNeely 2 commentsListen Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

Add to my study list

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!

Sign In | Sign Up

×

Downloads

Downloads

MP3 Audio (6.02 MB)

Downloads

Message To Great Britain: No Membership Will Cost You

Downloads

MP3 Audio (6.02 MB)

×

0:00:00

0:04:22

Behind the Brexit vote is the historical reality and prophetic legacy of Europe's power structure. What does it mean for Britain and the EU moving forward?

Fred Mouniguet/Unspalsh

Great Britain's relationship to the EU has changed. Will the economic skyline of the UK be in peril? How will future events change Europe? [Photo: The Shard skyscraper in London]

It is startling to read a news item that directly reminds you of a Bible prophecy. Comments by Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel and by French President Francois Hollande about Great Britain’s new relationship with the EU after the Brexit vote are ominously close to such a statement in Revelation 13.
Revelation 13 describes a world super power that arises near the conclusion of this age. It is described as a “beast,” which is the biblical language for a large national power that dominates whole regions of the world. This political power is joined by a second “beast,” which performs great signs that deceive. It is this second beast that “causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or in their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the number of the beast, or the number of his name” (Revelation 13:16-17 Revelation 13:16-1716 And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
American King James Version×).

It appears a more determined Europe will emerge from this crisis—a power determined to push forward its stated course in today’s world.

Here is described an economic power that controls trade in goods and services on a global scale. It works in connection with a religious power. Historically, Europe is the seat of such a power. Today we are watching the EU struggle through the effect of Great Britain’s decision to pull out of the European Union after more than 40 years of membership. Last week’s vote shocked Europe. EU leaders are working out their anger, their concern and their uncertainty through contradictory public statements. No one seems to know the longterm effect Britain’s decision has.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande seem to have a firmer grasp of a future direction than most. After a meeting of EU heads of state they emphasized that full access to the market meant full membership and nothing less. Freedom to trade within the bloc accompanies acceptance of free movement of people within the bloc, a key reason Great Britain’s citizens voted to leave. “To access the internal market, [a country] must respect the four liberties: liberty of circulation of goods, of capital, of services and people,” President Hollande said. “It must also contribute to the EU budget, he said” (Wall Street Journal, Laurence Norman, Valentina Pop and Jenny Gross, “EU Leaders Warn U.K of Brexit Cost at Brussels Summit, July 29, 2016 “). Speaking to the German Parliament, Chancellor Merkel said, “We will ensure that negotiations won’t be conducted according to the principle of cherry-picking, those wanting to leave the family can’t expect all obligations to become obsolete while privileges would continue to exist” (ibid).
EU leaders are not in a mood to allow Britain to continue on as if nothing has changed. Great Britain’s relationship to the EU has changed. Its economic future is in peril. Its influence among the nations will diminish. It trading future with the world’s largest trading bloc will be altered. At present Europe is not looking benignly on Britain’s decision. Future events, even the aftermath of this dramatic event, will change how Europe sees itself. Europe is too big to fail and it will not see its global position eroded by Brexit or future crisis. It appears a more determined Europe will emerge from this crisis—a power determined to push forward its stated course in today’s world.
Revelation 13 describes a Europe-based global power that holds the world enthralled. It will dictate political, cultural, humanitarian and even religious standards to a world looking for order and security. We are seeing the rumblings of such a state in the headlines of this significant event.

Bible Prophecy Great Britain European Union

You might also be interested in...

The Brexit Vote: What Does It Mean for Bible Prophecy?

The United Kingdom has voted to exit the European Union. How will this affect...

Britain: Repairing a Broken Society

A time is coming when God's government—the Kingdom of God—will repair what is...

• 

  Darris McNeely

  Beyond Today Presenter

  Darris McNeely works at the United Church of God home office in Cincinnati, Ohio. He and his wife, Debbie, have served in the ministry for more than 43 years. They have two sons, who are both married, and four grandchildren. Darris is the Associate Media Producer for the Church. He also is a resident faculty member at the Ambassador Bible Center teaching Acts, Fundamentals of Belief and World News and Prophecy. He enjoys hunting, travel and reading and spending time with his grandchildren.

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about the fall of the U.S., the U.K, and Israel. This follows this post about the Feast of Trumpets. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

The United States and Great Britain will Fall with the State of Israel

 by United Church of God Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

"Israel" was the new name God gave the biblical patriarch Jacob in Genesis 32. The 12 tribes of Israel were descended from his 12 sons. These tribes later formed a united kingdom.

It’s been almost 3,000 years since the kingdom of Israel was split in two. Ten of the 12 tribes of Israel rebelled against King Rehoboam, the son of King Solomon and grandson of King David. The Bible continued to refer to these 10 tribes as Israel while the other two tribes (Judah and Benjamin) that remained loyal to David’s descendants were known as the kingdom of Judah or simply Judah.
Sometimes Israel is referred to as the northern kingdom and Judah as the southern kingdom. Dominant among the northern tribes were to be the descendants of Jacob’s son Joseph through his sons Ephraim and Manasseh—prophesied by Jacob to be the chief nations of the world in the last days (Genesis 49:1, Genesis 49:22-26; compare Deuteronomy 33:13-17).
About 200 years after the kingdom split, the northern tribes of Israel fell to Assyria and were deported by the Assyrians to the northern parts of their empire. Often referred to now as the lost tribes, they later migrated northwest across Europe, eventually settling in new homelands far from the Middle East.
The kingdom of Judah fell to Babylon more than a century after Israel’s deportation, but its people were not lost to history. We know them today as the Jews.
The name Ephraim is sometimes used representatively in Scripture for the entire northern kingdom, though it can also refer solely to the descendants of Joseph’s son of that name—prophesied to become a “multitude of nations” (Genesis 48:19). Remarkably, this promise to Ephraim was fulfilled in the British Empire and Commonwealth.
Ephraim’s older brother Manasseh was also prophesied to become a great nation (same verse), separating himself from the multitude of nations. This prophecy would be fulfilled in the formation, growth and dominance of the United States of America.
In a revealing prophecy regarding the United States and Britain, Jacob (Israel) said, “Let my name be named upon them” (Genesis 48:16). References to “Israel” in end-time prophecy often refer to the United States or the English-speaking countries of the British Empire or both. Sometimes “Israel” can mean all 12 tribes. We have to look at specific verses in their context to see which is meant. (To investigate the biblical evidence of this, please read our free study aid, The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy .)
“Judah,” however, always refers to the Jews, the descendants of the house or kingdom of Judah. We must also understand that the modern nation called Israel is really Judah, made up of Jews (see sidebar “ Are all Israelites Jews? “).
Understanding this critical part of biblical history will help us more fully comprehend a passage of Scripture in the book of Hosea, which is a prophecy about Ephraim (the multitude of nations—Great Britain and some of those nations that came out of her). It warns of destruction to follow the end-time ascendancy of the Israelite nations.
In Hosea 5 we read a prophecy that mentions Israel, Ephraim and Judah: “The pride of Israel testifies to his face; therefore Israel and Ephraim stumble in their iniquity; Judah also stumbles with them” (Hosea 5:5). The prophecy continues: “With their flocks and herds they shall go to seek the Lord, but they will not find Him; He has withdrawn Himself from them. They have dealt treacherously with the Lord, for they have begotten pagan children. Now a New Moon shall devour them and their heritage” (Hosea 5:6-7).
New moons occur a month apart. A new moon “devouring” them would seem to mean that Israel, Ephraim and Judah will all fall within one month.
This prophecy was not fulfilled in ancient times. As already mentioned, ancient Judah fell to Babylon more than a century after Israel fell to Assyria. Yet in the end it appears they will fall together—within one month of each other. This prophecy remains to be fulfilled.
Remember that Israel gave his name to Ephraim and Manasseh, the ancestors in turn of the British and American peoples. As Ephraim is mentioned separately in this prophecy, the reference to “Israel” must apply to the United States, which is now the more dominant of the two nations.
For two centuries prior to World War II, the roles were reversed with the multitude of nations—the British Empire—a greater power than the single nation, the United States. But today America is the greater.
“Judah” refers to the Jewish people, particularly those who now constitute the modern nation in the Middle East that calls itself Israel.
Here then is a prophecy regarding all three nations—the United States, Britain and Israel (Judah). According to this prophecy, it appears that all three will fall within the span of a month. Hosea 6:6 shows these nations turning back to God, but finding it’s too late. Because of their sins, He will let them suffer defeat and collapse.
This prophecy could not have been fulfilled until after the rise of Britain and the United States as world powers in the 19th century and the formation of the Jewish state of Israel in the 20th.
Consider that Israel and the United States are perhaps the most maligned and criticized nations on earth. Among Muslim hard-liners, America is commonly called “the great Satan” and Israel and Britain “the little Satans.”

‹ 4. A Dominating Roman System Will Come to Power up Are all Israelites Jews? ›

Jesus Christ News and Prophecy Conflicts and War End Times Governments Britain Israel United States 7 prophetic signs

You might also be interested in...

2. A Jewish Homeland will be Established in Israel

"And in that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which faces...

4. A Dominating Roman System Will Come to Power

In Daniel 2 and 7 we see prophecies about four great gentile empires that would...

World News and Trends: Britain vulnerable to Iranian-sponsored terrorism

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Islamic terrorism. This follows this post about the Quran. This follows this post about Zika. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

World News and Trends

Britain vulnerable to Iranian-sponsored terrorism

 by Jerold Aust, John Ross Schroeder Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

Noted British columnist Melanie Phillips has alerted London to the indigenous dangers posed by Hezbollah.

Noted British columnist Melanie Phillips has alerted London to the indigenous dangers posed by Hezbollah. She pointed to its Islamic designation as the so-called Army of God, “a military force funded, trained by and answerable to the Islamic Republic of Iran”—a nation pledged to “the destruction of Israel and the genocide of the Jews, as a prelude to destroying the West and infidels everywhere” ( The Spectator, Aug. 5).
The Islamic Human Rights Commission [IHRC] in the United Kingdom encourages Muslims in Britain to supply Hezbollah with “financial, logistical and international support” in its attacks on Israel.
And Britain itself is still a target, as recent events at Heathrow Airport have shown. Recently Iran 's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on TV that ” England was the founder of this sinister regime”—meaning Israel—and was “an accomplice to all of its crimes” (ibid.)
British Jews may be even more vulnerable than the general public. The Times stated, “The Jewish community in Britain is facing a wave of anti-Semitism as a result of the conflict in Lebanon ” (Aug. 8). The Jewish Chronicle referred to it as a “wave of intimidation.” Already occurring are abusive telephone messages, hate mail to Jewish organizations and various incidents like the name Hezbollah being painted near one of Glasgow 's synagogues.
The stakes are high for the whole Western world. As British Member of Parliament Michael Gove wrote: “Western failure to support Israel will have global consequences . . . When the West fails to offer an appropriate defence of Israel it succeeds only in undermining its own long-term security” ( The Times, Aug. 4).
Melanie Phillips concluded her article with these somber words: “But if Israel were to lose to Iran, it would herald a catastrophe for the entire world.” (Sources: The Spectator, The Times, The Jewish Chronicle [all London].)

terrorism Middle East Britain World Regions Conflicts and War News and Prophecy

You might also be interested in...

World News and Trends: The Iranian threat to the Middle East

Understand the historical and prophetic significance of the current dilemmas in...

World News and Trends: Nuclear neighbors now likely in the Middle East

The likelihood of an Iranian nuclear armory has opened up the possibility of...

• 

  Jerold Aust

  United Church of God Pastor

  Jerold Aust has served in the ministry for 45 years, as a public speaker for 51 years, a published writer for 31 years, and is employed by UCG’s Media and Communications Services. He is a Senior Writer, interviewer, and editor for The Good News Magazine and also teaches Speech Communication for UCG’s ministerial online program.

A timely post about from www.jihadwatch.org about Google and Islam. This follows this post about the Clinton Foundation. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.You can follow me here.

How Google’s search engines use faked results to manipulate people’s views of jihad

By Robert Spencer 92 Comments

This post by Jihad Watch tech expert Marc offers extraordinary insight into how Google skews its presentation of information in order to manipulate people into accepting half-truths and falsehoods that serve the Left’s agenda. He explains how Google deliberately manipulates its results when one searches for the word “jihad” — and doubtless this is just one of countless examples of how Google advances the Leftist/Islamic supremacist line while burying the truth.

“How Google’s Search Engines use faked results for social engineering,” FreeSpeechDefense.net, September 4, 2016:

So how does it work, I’ll use one example, a simple Google search for the word “Jihad”, but first I’d like to give you some background on how Google search is understood and intended to work. My knowledge comes from a variety of sources, but is in line with the well known public authority on the subject of Search Engine Optimisation (SEO), an employee and till recently the public voice of Google and its search engine, Matt Cutts, he now works for the Pentagon (yeh, I know). Google has published an “overview” of how it all works, but that’s a lot to get through.
So in a nutshell, Google is looking for the freshest, most authoritative, easiest to display (big screen and mobile) content to serve its search engine users, it crawls them, caching (grabbing) content, looking at the speed of download, the textual content, counting words to find the relevance, checking what it looks like on different sized devices. It also looks at what other sites link to it, both number of and “quality” of those links. When I say quality, it wants to see how authoritative the linking in sites are. They also have a number of algorithms in place that block the listing of “spammy” sites, but spam would not be relevant here. Additionally they also have recently claimed to boost sites using HTTPS to promote security and privacy (fox, henhouse – lol).
There are a few exceptions which I don’t think anyone could have issue with, a search for a single word might bring up a dictionary or encyclopedia, but more often, they add Wikipedia to the list of results, especially if it’s a busy wiki page with constant updates.
There is a way to beat these results and get to the top, and that’s by paying for the Google Adwords service, these ads at the top are clearly identified with a little “Ad” button, that is not the case here.
I am not in the US, so used a VPN to proxy my research from the US, as searches from other locations provide different results.
So search the word “jihad”, and you will see at the top of a list of 32 million results a list as this:

1. A dictionary definition
2. Wikipedia
3. A link to a page of the “Islamic Supreme Council”
4. A link to “Jihad Watch”

So we know how the dictionary definition and Wikipedia got there, but how did the “Islamic Supreme Council” and “Jihad Watch” get 3^rd and 4^th place? JihadWatch.org I know well, I do the server and site management, following SEO best practice, here are the major pertinent reasons for its high listing in such a competitive search, 32 million is huge in this game:

• Robert Spencer, an accomplished author is a prolific blogger, adding a minimum of 10 posts of current jihad related news stories of the day.
• It’s part of the domain name, that always gives a massive boot (searching “free speech defense”, my tiny, low volume blog always comes top).
• Doing a jihad site:jihadwatch.org shows that the word “jihad” is mentioned on the site 35,000 times, proving its main focus of discussion is “jihad”.
• A search for just jihadwatch.org shows that it is mentioned on 631,000 other sites pages (linking in), proving it is very authoritative and often referenced.
• Jihadwatch.org is currently the 10,488^th most popular website in the US, this fluctuates, but not much.
• The site uses HTTPS and a responsive (mobile friendly) theme, so it looks great on any device.

So how about the “Islamic Supreme Council”, I’d never heard of them. I asked a few people who have studied Islam, they hadn’t either, so lets look at the comparative statistics:

• The site is run by Sheik Kabbani, a Naqshbandi Sufi. It has additional posts added a couple of times a year, the latest news panel lists an event in 1996.
• It has “Islamic” in the domain name, understandable that Google maybe has confused the two words. /sarc off
• Doing a jihad site:islamicsupremecouncil.org shows that the word “jihad” is mentioned on the site 123 times, whereas searching the word “Sufi” brings up over 200 results proving it’s main focus of discussion is not “jihad”.
• A search for just islamicsupremecouncil.org shows that it is mentioned on 79,000 other sites pages (linking in), showing it is as 1/10th as popular/authoritative as jihadwatch.org.
• This is confirmed with an Alexa popularity search, showing it is the 307,832^_th most popular site in the US.
• The site does not use HTTPS, and it is very mobile unfriendly, using technology from a previous millennium (I’m not kidding, it’s using web standards from 1999 if you look at the source files).

So what’s up? How does the site get this boost, if you search the word Sufi, the “Islamic Supreme Council” isn’t even listed in the top 10 pages. Funny thing about the meaning of the word “Jihad”, to the fast majority of Muslims they themselves know of two meanings, the Google dictionary definition at the top of the results is correct:

1. (among Muslims) a war or struggle against unbelievers.
2. the spiritual struggle within oneself against sin.

Often differentiated as the greater and lesser Jihad, but Sunni and Shia Muslims, who make up the vast majority of Muslims, understand when the word Jihad is used alone they mean the violent kind, world conquering imposing of Sharia law, blowing stuff up and cutting heads of infidels, and they accept the lesser Jihad as a false construct, but that’s another debate, you can read more here at wikiislam.
But what is unique about Sufis, a tiny minority of Muslims, if in fact they are Muslims, as the vast majority of Muslims do not accept Sufis as such, and many Sufis themselves do not identify with being Muslim, is that they are unique in only having this peaceful, lesser Jihad, being somewhat pacifists, ironically often violently targeted for their beliefs in Muslim majority countries.
So in conclusion, how are you being socially engineered by Google? Anyone doing a search for Jihad will think they are seeing an opposing, authoritative view of Jihad Watch’s, but the “Islamic Supreme Council” is of no authority, it’s poor in every way. Nonetheless, the Googler will read all about all this peaceful unrepresentative Jihad, trusting Google will live by their moto “Don’t be evil”. Former Google CEO and current executive chairman Eric Schmidt once said, “it was a dumb rule merely because the word ‘evil’ isn’t really defined, and Google doesn’t quite know what evil is.”
So how about another site which might be more of an authority on Jihad in the US, cair.com (Council on American-Islamic Relations) is constantly being updated, is far more popular at 146,590th place, actually probably even more so, as it has a vast network of sites. A search for jihad site:cair.com gives 342 results, and is mentioned and linked to a whopping 60 million times, it’s mobile friendly and has HTTPS enabled, and it’s not even on the top 10 pages of results for a search on Jihad. Odd, that except their own political agenda is for Americans to believe the Sufi understanding of Jihad is a common Muslim understanding, rather than their own aggressive one, with proven ties between CAIR, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. Some would say “a war or struggle against unbelievers” Jihad was CAIR’s main purpose, advertising that fact doesn’t help their agenda, much better American Googlers read the Sufi version for them. I think I have described in detail how this subtle manipulation works.
It’s not a secret. Facebook has been at it also. The connections with the Obama administration and now Hillary Clinton are well documented. My enemy’s enemy is not my necessarily my friend, but here is what Julian Assange has to say on the collusion between the US administration and Google.

DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson addresses ISNA, Muslim group linked to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood

UK journo: Syrian kidnapper who shot me twice is now a CIA-vetted "moderate"

GOP Blames Victim For Media Rape

An interesting article from http://www.vdare.com about the EXTREME bias in the media! This follows this post about Donald Trump's recent endorsements. Remember, “Amnesty” means ANY non-enforcement of existing immigration laws! This follows this comment and this post about how to Report Illegal Immigrants! Also, you can read two very interesting books HERE.
Please follow me here.

It's particularly bad when you consider that Trump's "controversies" are un-PC statements, and Clinton's scandals are actual felonies.

<

Ann Coulter: GOP Blames Victim For Media Rape

---

Ann Coulter

Even having predicted that the media’s attacks on Trump would be unprecedented, I’m still amazed. Every single news outlet is dedicated to hysterically denouncing Trump, every minute of every day, while cooing at Hillary.
Everything Hillary has ever touched has failed, been engulfed in scandal, resulted in massive investigations, litigation, financial ruin, prison or death. The final stage of any Hillary enterprise is a grand announcement that Hillary did not technically break the law. Or no one can prove she did. Or, even if she did, no one ever gets prosecuted for it.
She’s prone to coughing fits and lapses of memory in the middle of speeches, and falls down all the time. But that’s not nearly as important as the media’s manufactured story about Trump throwing a baby out of a rally!
Trump is supposed to be joined at the hip to David Duke based on not “disavowing” him with sufficient ferocity the 17th time he was asked about this person he’s never met, never mentioned and didn’t invite to speak at his convention.
Hillary invited the mother of violent cop-hating criminal Mike Brown to speak at her convention, and the Democratic platform expressly endorses the anti-police Black Lives Matter–even as these celebrated cop haters inspire the mass slaughter of police officers across the country, in New York City, Dallas and Baton Rouge.
Now we find out that another honored guest at Hillary events is the father of Omar Mateen, the Muslim jihadist who murdered 49 people at a gay nightclub in Orlando a few months ago. On Monday night, he attended a Hillary rally where he sat cheering, right behind her on the stage.
Is David Duke’s father given VIP seating at Trump events? (As long as you mention it, did David Duke gun down 49 people in June? Or ever? Or anyone?)

ADVERTISEMENT

It took the national media 24 hours to mention the fact that the jihadist’s father is a big Hillary supporter, sitting in the camera’s line of sight at her Florida rally. A Google search of Trump and David Duke produces more than 11 million hits. A Google search of Hillary and Omar Mateen gets a few hundred thousand hits.
Hillary’s being supported by the father of a jihadist is treated like back-page stuff, presented amid florid excuses and rationalizations. It was a staffer’s mistake, an “unforced error,” and Hillary’s opponents are “leaping on it.”
The main story this week: The media’s psychotic claim that Trump called for Hillary’s assassination.
Trump said: “Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish, the Second Amendment. If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”
Hmmm. What could Second Amendment people “do”? One thing they could do is what they did do — in 1994. That was the year gun rights supporters voted out dozens of Democrats who voted wrong on guns, ushering in the first Republican Congress in 40 years.
It’s been nearly a quarter century, and the Democrats are still so traumatized by their sweeping losses in 1994, that, even after Gabby Giffords was shot in Arizona, even after the Aurora movie theater shooting, even after the Sandy Hook massacre, Democrats refused to take up a gun bill in the U.S. Senate.
Apparently, the only news you’ll be getting from now until the election is the media’s own insane interpretation of every little thing Trump says or does. Anyone remember the week-long scandal about a star on a Trump retweet?
No one, not even Joe McCarthy, has ever faced this level of obsessive hatred from our constitutionally protected guardians of liberty in the press. Anyone else would be chewed up and spit out after one minute of such relentless attacks.
But sissy conservatives who have never faced one minute of press hostility blame the victim, saying it’s Trump’s fault for giving the media openings to twist his words.
The sissies have no idea what they’re talking about. There’s no way to phrase something so that it can’t be lied about. Here are the first three lines from an affectionate article on Hillary Clinton in Wednesday’s New York Times:
— “Hillary Clinton Hopes to Capitalize on Republican Defectors”
Hillary to accept bribes from Goldman Sachs, Halliburton and the Koch brothers.
— “Hillary Clinton’s campaign would like to turn the drip-drip-drip of Republican defectors abandoning Donald J. Trump into a deluge.”
Hillary supports the use of Chinese water torture.
— “On Wednesday, after days in which several high-profile Republicans said they could not support Mr. Trump or were endorsing Mrs. Clinton, her campaign introduced an official outreach effort to target Republicans …”
Hillary campaign to “target” Republicans for murder.
There’s no strategy for overcoming this level of media hostility. Trump has made some mistakes during this campaign, but he hasn’t done anything wrong for months now. He could say “yes,” and the media would change the question to, “Are you a child molester?”
Craven Republicans who blame Trump for the media’s lies may as well blame a rape victim for wearing a short skirt. Except with Trump, it’s the Muslim standard: They’re blaming a woman’s rape on being a woman.
COPYRIGHT 2015 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
Ann Coulter is the legal correspondent for Human Events and writes a popular syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate. She is the author of ELEVEN New York Times bestsellers—collect them here.
Her book, ¡Adios America! The Left’s Plan To Turn Our Country Into A Third World Hell Hole, was released on June 1, 2015.

A timely post about from www.jihadwatch.org about Benghazi victims' families suing Hillary Clinton. This follows this post about Donald Trump. This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries. For more, you can read two very interesting books HERE.You can follow me here.

Parents suing Hillary Clinton for wrongful death and defamation over jihad murders in Benghazi

 By Christine Williams 65 Comments

The parents of two Americans killed in a jihad attack in Benghazi are suing Hillary Clinton for wrongful death and defamation, citing her “‘extreme carelessness” in handling “confidential and classified information” that got into the hands of the jihad terrorists who launched the deadly attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi.
Clinton has been consistently under the microscope for apparent recklessness with regard to jihadists and their threats to America and to the West.
Recall a statement she made, that “Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”
Hillary Clinton did not need to be told that not all Muslims are jihadists, but her politically correct statement manifested a reckless disregard for and undermining of the global jihad war against infidels and apostates, at a time when the sufferings of the victims of that war, Christians, Yazidis, the state of Israel, and other Muslims, are incalculable.
Let’s also not forget the Western victims who have been attacked by jihadis on their own soil — but to reckless Hillary, Muslims “have nothing whatsoever” to do with any of that.
Also in a speech, she reportedly “slowed to mock three words – ‘radical Islamic terrorism.'”
Well, now Hillary Clinton is being sued by parents who went through the grief of losing their children due to “radical Islamic terrorism” that Muslims “have nothing whatsoever to do with.”

“Two Benghazi Parents Sue Hillary Clinton for Wrongful Death, Defamation”, Breitbart, August 8, 2016:

The parents of two Americans killed in the 2012 terrorist attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya, filed a wrongful death lawsuit in federal court Monday against Hillary Clinton.
In the suit, Patricia Smith and Charles Woods, the parents of Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods, claim that Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server contributed to the attacks. They also accuse her of defaming them in public statements.
Smith was an information management officer and Woods was a security officer, both stationed in Benghazi.
“The Benghazi attack was directly and proximately caused, at a minimum by defendant Clinton’s ‘extreme carelessness’ in handling confidential and classified information,” such as the location of State Department employees in Libya, the lawsuit said…..
Such information, the lawsuit claimed, “easily found its way to foreign powers” and was then obtained by Islamic terrorists.

Hugh Fitzgerald: Calculating the Costs of Muslim Terrorism: La Braderie, For Example

The FBI knew jihadis were targeting Garland free speech event. So why did they have only one agent there?