Showing posts with label Help. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Help. Show all posts

Monday, January 23, 2012

Wknd Box Office: Haywire, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, Red Tails, A Dangerous Method

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/  reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post some of the movies from last week and  THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed!  This all  follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!




Wknd Box Office: Haywire, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, Red Tails, A Dangerous Method

By Debbie Schlussel



Most of the new movies, this weekend, are ho-hum, but there’s one I enjoyed.


* “Haywire“: I really enjoyed this. It’s a light but stylized thriller, with mild intrigue and lots of fights and action. If you liked Mixed Martial Arts (MMA), you’ll especially like this, as its star is first-time movie actress, Gina Carano, a real life MMA champion. Normally, I hate movies in which petite women, like Palestina Jolie beat up multiple men who are much larger than they are. This is different because Carano is bigger, a little more butch, a lot more muscular, and she’s a lot more believable (except when she beats up the much taller and bigger and very hot Channing Tatum).



Carano is a black-ops secret agent who works for a government contractor. She’s been set up and marked for death by her bosses during a mission in Ireland, and she can’t figure out why. The rest of the movie shows her trying to not only escape more bad guys, but discover what’s actually going on and why. Lots of chases and more. You won’t fall asleep during this one.











The beginning is kind of confusing, as are some of the flashbacks, but it quickly picks up and everything is explained. And, at around 1.5 hours, it’s the perfect length for a movie. When it finished, I wanted more. My kinda movie and especially good for January, when bad movies are usually released to die a quick death.



THREE REAGANS



* “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close“: That author Jonathan Safran Foer, on whose book this movie was based, is an unabashed anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian Jew (who attacked Israel in a book edited by anti-Semite Jew Tony Kushner) isn’t the reason I hated this, but it only added to it. I found this movie incredibly pretentious and annoying, not to mention cruel and a time-waster. It’s mostly a wild goose chase by a too-smart, too-geniusy, annoying young boy. And, as with all Hollywood movies, there is absolutely no reference to who perpetrated 9/11. Apparently that was done in a vacuum by some ghosts who shall not be named. Yup, can’t sully the Muslims. That’s the ticket.



A father (Tom Hanks), who is very close with his young genius son, dies in the World Trade Center on 9/11. His son, who is rude and obnoxious, comes home to verbally abuse the doorman (this is supposed to be funny?). He discovers answering machine messages from his father calling to say what is happening in the Towers. The father also calls to say good-bye, after the son has returned home, and the son doesn’t answer the call, just merely listens. Huh? Then, the son hides the answering machine messages from his grieving mother (Sandra Bullock) and lies, telling her that the father never called. This is what passes for entertainment? Puh-leeze. It was cold and gratuitously cruel, making no discernible point.



Soon, the son discovers a key in a vase in his father’s closet. The key is in an envelope marked “Black,” and the son takes this to mean that his deceased father left him something and that someone with that last name holds the answer to what the key opens. The rest of the movie is mostly a search for that, with the message that all people named, “Black,” regardless of ethnicity or background are all human and to be loved and cherished. We are the world, we are the children . . . blah, blah, blah. Oh, and the boy embarks on most of his search with an old man who he’s told rents a room in his grandmother’s apartment, but he has other suspicions about who the man is. The man does not talk because he’s a survivor of the war. The boy is incredibly rude and mean to the old man, despite his “Can’t we all just get along” baloney with everyone named “Black,” so I guess he didn’t learn the lesson the movie saccharinly preaches to us.



This movie is a senseless time bandit. It stole two hours plus of my life I’ll never get back. Long, slow, and pointless. . . except to buy a self-hating Jewish author another luxe multi-million dollar apartment in New York.



THREE MARXES




* “Red Tails“: George Lucas whined to the media that he couldn’t get this movie made or distributed by Hollywood because it’s about Black people, and Hollywood is racist, so he had to finance it himself. Um, maybe the real reason has nothing to do with racism–a charge that seems trumped up to sell this movie as some sort of chit on the Black side of the race wars. Maybe the real reason this movie went nowhere before Lucas financed it, is because it’s just not a great movie. Not even close. And the script is slack. I like a good World War II movie, regardless of the race of the characters/actors. But this ain’t it.



That’s no knock on the tremendous, heroic accomplishments of the Tuskegee Airmen, a highly-decorated group of segregated Black pilots who fought in World War II and helped America beat the Nazis and the Axis. They were patriots, for sure. But it is a knock on this race-baiting, unrealistic movie that doesn’t do the Tuskegee Airmen proud. The script is long-winded and boring, except for the scenes in the air and a scene of a brave airman who helps White soldiers evade the Nazis. Those are suspenseful. The rest of the movie seems slapped together by someone with an agenda.



Almost all of the characters in this movie are caricatures.  Most of the White soldiers and airmen in the movie are racists who completely do a 180 immediately upon seeing the in-the-sky skills of the Tuskegee pilots.  Is that realistic?  Probably not. Racists generally don’t change that easily.  Yes, there was racism and segregation then–those are facts of history.  But, while there were one or two decent White commanding officers in the film, the “evil White men” theme made me feel like I was watching the guy’s version of this year’s other raved-about race-baiting movie, “The Help” (read my review).  And most of the Black pilots are saints, soon described by White soldiers as “the finest soldier I’ve ever met” and “the best pilots we’ve ever flown with.”  That the Tuskegee Airmen were the most highly decorated group of pilots in World War II is a fact (which is presented in the movie).  But the hyperbole is ridiculous, as are the disjointed stories that don’t help the movie along.



One pilot is presented as an alcoholic whose drinking nearly costs a pilot his life, but in the air there is no showing that his drinking hurt the other pilot. Another pilot is shown as a romantic who goes to the house of a woman he sees hanging laundry on the roof of her house near the Tuskegee Airmen’s Italian base. The woman and her mother immediately welcome this Black man into their home, and they begin dating, despite the fact that neither speaks the other’s language. How realistic is it that a White Italian mother in the early 1940s would welcome a Black guy to date her daughter? How realistic is it that a Black officer (Terrence Howard) would tell off his racist commanding officer in Washington and get away with it? It was just not accurate of the times or the behavior of the times.



Dialogue featured White airmen saying these lines about the Tuskegee Airmen:



We didn’t lose a single plane [with the Tuskegee Airmen providing them cover]. Well that’s a first.



And:



That’s the best G-d damn flying I’ve ever seen. Drinks are on us.



And:



He’s the best soldier I ever met.



Does this mean that White pilots were subpar and not good soldiers? Or somewhat substandard? That’s the implication. I liked the tagline of the movie, “Courage has no color.” The filmmakers should have taken that to heart. Again, the Tuskegee Airmen were heroes as were many other Blacks serving in the U.S. Armed Forces during World War II. But while they were no less heroic than their White counterparts, they were also no more so. To make the latter claim would be racist and inaccurate. They were equally heroic. Period. Racism then doesn’t justify reverse racism now.



And the movie was predictable. I figured out a mile away which guy would be dead by movie’s end and which one would return alive. And other than that and the scenes in the sky, there just wasn’t much there.



I’d have liked to see what happened after World War Ii when the soldiers returned home and how they were treated. That might have been more interesting. Some went home to tremendous racism, others went home and became successes, and others, themselves, like deceased corrupt Detroit Mayor Coleman Young, came home to be racists against Whites and race-baiters themselves. (Young famously supported the boycott of apartheid South Africa, while secretly diverting public funds to obtain his own personal stash of South African Krugerrands.) That would have been an interesting flick. But this movie didn’t tell those stories. It was just a bore.



One plus: the movie was ultimately patriotic. But even the scenes in which the Black pilots killed Nazis–which should have been fulfilling–weren’t all that thrilling. And that’s the fault of a bad movie and a bad script, not Hollywood “racism.” If anything, the racist constructs in the film seemed posed to breed more racism . . . not against actual racists in the 1940s but everyone else in 2012.



I’m thankful for the service and feats of the Tuskegee Airmen. But not so thankful for this movie.



ONE REAGAN


* “A Dangerous Method“: This weird movie is the story of the mentoring love-hate relationship between two pioneers of psychiatry and psychoanalysis, Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud, focusing mostly on Jung (Michael Fassbender) and his bizarre extramarital relationship with one of his patients (Keira Knightley), who goes on to become a psychiatrist herself. While it’s supposed to be based on fact, it seemed more obsessed with showing Jung and his paramour engaged in violent sex with him slapping her rear. Not entertaining. And it wasn’t enlightening in any way, and was very slow. Not for me, nor likely for you. And the point of this movie was . . .? I have no idea, other than to take your $10 and two hours.



TWO MARXES

Monday, August 15, 2011

Wknd Box Office: The Help, 30 Mins or Less, Final Destination 5

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/  reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post some of the movies from last week and  THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed!  This all  follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!




Wknd Box Office: The Help, 30 Mins or Less, Final Destination 5

By Debbie Schlussel



I’m torn by two of this weekend’s three new movies. I liked the stories in “30 Minutes or Less” and “Final Destination 5″ and was entertained by both. But in the case of the first, it was too unnecessarily raunchy for no reason. And in the case of the second, it was too unnecessarily graphic and grisly. So, I’m thinking maybe I need a new way of rating movies I liked, but whose filth/raunch and/or grisly violence were crap and which I could have done without. Maybe you have some ideas beyond my “null” symbol.




* “The Help“: If you’ve read my column on the real-life Black maid, Ablene Cooper, and her lawsuit against Kathryn Stockett–the author of the best-selling novel on which this movie is based–then, you know what I think of this movie. It’s a lie.



Yes, there was racism in the South in the ’60s, and I’m sure Black maids experienced it. No one is saying it didn’t happen. It did. But it’s truly hypocritical of a White liberal chick to lecture us about it, when in 2008, she ripped off her and her brother’s black maid, Ms. Cooper, and in 2011, still won’t give her a dime. The real racist, today, is the multi-millionairess, White limousine liberal hypocrite, Ms. Stockett, who continues to treat this maid like garbage, ripping off her name and story.



The movie is about Skeeter, a White tomboyish girl from a privileged family. She was raised by her family’s Black maid who was suddenly fired. She sees the racism of her friends and how they treat their Black maids poorly, and she convinces the maids to talk to her for a book, which she believes will make her career. As I’ve already noted, in the movie (and the book upon which it is based), Skeeter splits her advance up among the maids. In real life, Stockett stiffed the maid, Ablene Cooper, giving her bupkus. Zip. Nada.



On top of that and many other lies, the characters in this movie are so blatant, stark, and caricaturish, they simply aren’t to be believed, especially Bryce Dallas Howard’s character, Hilly, who is so black-and-white, she’s not to be believed. The movie isn’t just over the top, with its “Stepford Wife” type of women. It’s simply more caroon and comedy than real life. Oh, and its racist and manipulative, not to mention cloying and maudlin.



So much for the lie of a “post-racial” world in the Obama era. It’s just more rubbing our noses in it and lording it over us in an Oprah kinda way. No thanks. I’ve seen many of these movies, but they’re irrelevant. Today, Whites bend over backward for everyone, lest the racism card be played, and it’s played anyway. And we’ve endured affirmative action, minority set-asides, and any number of other government- and corporate-imposed preferences that constitute reverse racism.



And today, the most racist group of Americans is not White America, it’s Black America. But don’t look for a movie on that. Instead, we’re served up yet another movie for which audiences are supposed to laugh and laugh and applaud and applaud over the running story of a maid serving up her chocolate pie–baked from batter into which she defecated–to her former boss. As I noted in my column on the real life “The Help” story, I don’t applaud those who get their racist culinary skills from Jesse Jackson (who bragged about spitting in White people’s salads as a waiter).



“The Help,” while it’s well told, tells a story the reverse of which goes on far too much today. And we never see movies with that narrative. Not even close.



There are only two things I liked about this movie: the clothes . . . and the cars. And, for that, I can see a whole lot better stuff on “Mad Men.”



FOUR AL SHARPTONS PLUS FOUR JESSE JACKSONS




* “3o Minutes or Less“: The basic story of this movie is slightly shoplifted from real life. A pizza delivery man has a bomb put around his neck and is told that if he does not rob a bank and bring his assailants the money, the bomb’s timer will go off and he will explode. That much happened in real life, though the FBI said the Pennsylvania pizza man was in on it. And in the real story, he is mentally disabled. Plus the bomb does go off, and he dies.



This movie has a far happier story and ending, and it was better than I expected. Despite being extremely juvenile, it was very funny and entertaining. Jesse Eisenberg, as the pizza guy, does his usual great acting, too. That said, I’m very hard-pressed to recommend it because it’s been Judd Apatow-ized. It’s very raunchy and the language is constantly littered with four-letter words and other verbal filth. I’m no prude, and I enjoyed the movie. But it didn’t need this kind of crap, which took it into the gutter.



So, I’m torn about recommending it, and given my reservations, I cannot give it anything better than . . .



ZERO REAGANS OR MARXES – A WASH




* “Final Destination 5“: I really liked the very first “Final Destination,” but I haven’t seen numbers 2-4, so I was unaware of how escalatingly grisly and graphic the movies got. This is not for the faint of heart. Bodies are gratuitously sawed in half and otherwise dismembered in your face. It’s especially in your face, given that the movie is 3D.



Still, I like a good science fiction/supernatural thriller. And this delivers on that. It’s just a shame that the movie was ruined by disgusting blood, guts, and gore. There’s a ton of it.



You don’t have to have seen any of the “Final Destination” incarnations to see this. New story, different characters, same deal: one guy, in a group of several people traveling, has a vision of all of them dying and insists they get off, in order to save themselves. In the original movie, it involved getting off of a plane that was going to crash. In this one–at least at the beginning–it is a bus on a bridge. Death is upset it was cheated, and it ultimately gets its prey. Those who were supposed to die will meet death in freak accidents later on, unless they kill someone else who takes their place. It’s the same story in this movie.



Like I said, it’s entertaining and keeps you rapt. It’s not a bad movie and is kind of funny, too (if, at times, unintentionally). But it’s just so disgusting and bloody to watch, it wasn’t necessary. I saw two parents with their 8- and 10-year-old kids, and I asked them on the way out why they brought their kids to such a graphic movie. They looked at me like I was from Mars. And maybe, today, I am. Because this isn’t good for America, with this pointless, gratuitous gore and violence. It merely desensitizes us to the real thing.



And that’s why I can’t give this movie anything better than . . . .



ZERO REAGANS OR MARXES – A WASH