Showing posts with label #bikini. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #bikini. Show all posts

Thursday, March 10, 2016

Today's Toys Child's Play or Something Else?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about modern toys. This follows this post about job hunting. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.


“Yank out alien organs dripping in glowing alien blood.” This cheery invitation greets children 7 and under from the box of a toy called Dissect-an-Alien. It's part of the popular Mad Scientist line of playthings made by one of the nation's largest toy manufacturers.

Toys aren't what they used to be

Have you noticed what kinds of toys your children have been playing with lately? How are some of the new types of games and toys affecting them?
Toy manufacturing and marketing has boomed into a multibillion-dollar business. Toy makers not only follow the trends; they start them. Electronics and vivid graphics have added a new dimension to our children's toys.
But, with all that is available, are our children better off?

Benefits of playtime

When most of us reminisce about our childhood, we cannot help but think about our play with siblings, friends, pets and toys. I smile when I think about hiking to a waterfall in the woods with my dog or playing catch with my brother. On wintry Sunday afternoons, I remember playing chess for hours with my father.
Whether we had many toys or only a few, we all remember our favorite teddy bears, dolls, model cars or construction sets. Through toys children experiment, explore, express and discover themselves. They give their toys life, character, abilities and talents. With their imagination they project themselves into their play. Through make-believe they build a bridge with adulthood and look forward to growing up.
Play is important for a child's development. It is one way children learn about the world around them. How they relate to and play with toys helps them learn skills such as dexterity and hand-eye coordination.
Playing with other children helps a child with social development. He (or she) learns how to get along with, tolerate and share with other kids. By interacting with others, children learn how to solve problems.

Survival of the funnest

The first toys could well have been natural objects such as sticks, fir cones, seed pods, bones and smooth, round stones. Since then, dolls, balls, spinning tops and pull toys have become the basic playthings of many cultures.
When visiting a toy store in Russia, I was fascinated to see how universally boys and girls are attracted to animal shapes, puppets, dolls, and miniature cars, trucks and tractors.
At ancient burial sites, animal figures have been found that appear to have been made for no purpose other than to play with. For example, Persian wheeled pull or push toys carved from white limestone into the shapes of animals date from the 12th century B.C. Clues to the nature of many old toys have been found on ancient vases and reliefs, which often picture hobbyhorses, carts, hoops, balls, tops and musical instruments.
Toys were almost completely handcrafted until late in the 18th century, after which mass-produced objects for children to play with began to appear for the first time.
The last decade saw some entirely new species of toys. The computer-game craze reflects advances in science and technology. Yet, although the complexity of toys is on the increase, the longevity of games and toys is decreasing with the constantly changing popularity of styles and heroes.
Although exceptional toys exist that bring out the best in our children, there are an increasing number that represent alarming trends that we as parents need to be beware of. Many toys do not help a child develop imagination, or they develop an entirely wrong kind of creativity.

Violence, the occult, repulsion

Toy makers have found models such as GI Joe (a perennial best-seller) or Rambo-or characters from the current space, war and adventure movies-to be hot-selling items. Toy firearms that discharge lasers and fake bullets sell exceptionally well.
Toys that are disturbing to many parents, like The Blaster, casually offer a child a way to blow up the world. With push buttons and a handgrip with vast firepower, this toy is advertised to help its operator relieve tension: “Leave in your wake a flood of totally imaginary destruction and feel good about yourself once again.” The Blaster simulates machine-gun fire, laser beams and nuclear explosions.
Is this a good way to release tension? What are the lessons a child learns from this kind of toy? Are we doing anything other than teaching barbarism with toys like this?
The impact of playing with war toys increases inappropriate behavior such as hitting, kicking, hair-pulling and teasing. War toys can desensitize children toward violence, produce exaggerated fear of others and increase angry and violent behavior. Children may become more hyperactive, fight and quarrel more, and generally demonstrate more belligerence when they play with miniature weapons of destruction.

Sending a deadly message

By buying children war toys, the message parents send them is that it is appropriate to fight and solve problems violently. If we give impressionable children toys that imply that war or hostility is acceptable, then we send them the message that it is all right to act out feelings using weapons.
On the other hand, the prophet Isaiah speaks about a time during which man will no longer learn war and violence. In those days, erstwhile combatants “shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore” (Isaiah 2:4).
The huge increase in the popularity of electronic games assaults our children with violence. The National Coalition on Television Violence studied 95 Nintendo video games and found that 83 percent feature violent themes, with 58 percent spotlighting war games. The study discovered that children ages 8 through 10 are 80 percent more likely to fight among themselves after playing with interactive laser weapons.
In addition, video games can produce stress, are inherently frustrating and promote obsessive, even addictive, behavior. They also tend to isolate children from other people. Children scream at a video game because it won't do what they want it to. They may throw down the controls in rage or yell at people who come near them and break their concentration. If playmates are involved, they may yell at each other or end up fighting because of the game.
A mother commented that the family's video-game unit turned her two children, ages 10 and 8, into “animals.” She said her 10-year-old “can't stop playing once he starts.” The 8-year-old becomes frustrated, hostile, angry and violent when he plays. The two fight and argue with their friends over Nintendo.

Toying with the occult

Along with violent toys, children and adolescents experiment with the occult-and plenty of toys and games based on the supernatural are available. I strolled down the aisle of the largest toy chain store near my home. Piled high in one section were Ouija boards and other games that encourage dabbling in the occult.
One particularly hideous game is Nightmare on Elm Street: The Freddie Game, based on a movie about a man who murders teenagers. In this nightmare of a toy, Freddie is depicted wearing a glove equipped with razor-sharp blades for slashing his victims.
Do we really want our children to amuse themselves with such a “game”? What could possibly be redeeming about it? Such games only encourage children to come close to the mysterious world of fear, ugliness and death.
Another toy, Boglins, encourages children to identify with lovable but ugly little creatures that come alive in their hands. Still another, the Brain Blaster, has a head that falls apart, with brain matter falling out in chunks. Drool is a hand puppet that lives up to its name. Airsickness depicts an airline passenger strapped into a seat with a look of nauseated anticipation on his face.
Other toys in the Mad Scientist series include one called Monster Lab, which invites children to “make disgusting, gross monsters . . . then sizzle the flesh off their bones.” On the box, a group of young boys is depicted dipping a creature in a frothing vat of make-believe acid.
Then there is the Glowing Glop kit, with advertising that advises youngsters to “squeeze 'em! Alien blood oozes from their eyes.” The popularity of such dreadful toys has prompted a popular brand of candy that looks like spiders and rats, which children are encouraged to devour.
Some adults are rightly concerned with trends toward repulsiveness in lines of toys such as Garbage Pail Kids, because the ugliness desensitizes children to the point that they are no longer offended by violence, sadism and the grotesque.
In the context of children, Jesus Christ warned those who would take advantage of the impressionable and defenseless: “But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea” (Matthew 18:6).

You buy the toys

The president of Child World, which owns Children's Palace, the second-largest toy-store chain in the United States, stated that playthings featuring the grotesque “are selling quite well. They seem to be part of what we see as a larger trend aimed at little boys for gross kinds of stuff.”
The Toy Manufacturers Association sees no harm in such toys. “When it comes to grossness, we firmly believe that the decision to buy the toys should be made by the parents.”
Even though it comes from a perspective I strongly disagree with, that's good advice, parents. The TMA couldn't have said it any better. The decision to purchase such toys is up to you. As parents, we should closely monitor and evaluate the kinds of toys our children play with. We should make it clear to our offspring that we, as adults, will help choose their toys.
How is it that children are so knowledgeable about and lust for certain kinds of consumer goods? It is no coincidence that children's television programming is often little more than one long advertisement for toys. Your children are a lucrative market, to say the least.
In one year the average 4- to 8-year-old will see 1,000 or more 30-second and 180 or so 30-minute cartoon commercials selling war toys—the equivalent of 18 days of classroom instruction in exciting, stimulating pro-war entertainment. Advertising like this is effective; war-toy sales increased 700 percent in five years from 1982 to 1987.
Don't let yourself feel guilty if you don't get your children the particular toys they want. Don't allow children to go crazy for every toy with a certain make-believe character's picture on it. Monitor what your children watch, and take control of the toy purchases in your family. Your children should not be preyed upon by toy manufacturers competing for your money with bizarre and grotesque products.

What's good

In the midst of commercialism and chaos, you can make many sensible choices if first you consider the impact of a toy before you buy it.
Toys need not be expensive. For example, a device as simple as a yo-yo will teach a child a memorable lesson about objects in motion he will recall in high school and college when he studies physics.
Question the value of any toy your child asks for. How will he (or she) benefit from a particular toy? Will his imagination be directed toward wholesomeness? What will she learn? Will it help her solve problems? Will it help him use his mind?
Will the toy help him interact with others? Will it help her refine her skills or explore and discover things about herself and the world around her? There are many creative, peaceful toys that will stretch your child's imagination while giving hours of fun.
Classic construction sets such as those made by Tinker Toys, Lego, Lincoln Logs and Erector are excellent choices. They help a child imagine a structure, then build it. A simple microscope-or chemistry or electronic kit-with which you can guide a child in learning about the physical creation is also a good choice.
When shopping for toys, you may find it best to avoid the products of high-visibility companies that promote toys that go well with heavily sugared cereals and Saturday-morning television. You can do a lot better by going to the toy department of a science museum or out-of-the-way shops near college campuses.
Hobby stores are a good source for toys. In them you will find products that force parents to spend time with their children as together they learn how they work.

Keep it simple

The toy industry has made many of their wares too complicated. Simplicity should top the list of things to look for in a toy. Something as basic and durable as a ball could be a child's first toy. Skills learned from throwing, catching and bouncing a ball endure for a lifetime.
Often the simplest toys last while the complicated ones drop dead when their batteries run down. Keeping toys supplied with alkaline sources of power can get expensive.
When planning a purchase, consider how an item could be used by the whole family to help bring parents and children together to play and talk. One problem with many electronic games is that children retire to their own little world and tune out everything and everyone around them.
Parents are often irritated and repulsed by a game's sounds, or they may not have the faintest idea how to play it. If children spend too much time playing with electronic games, they tend to get bored easily and aren't interested in developing relationships with others.
Sports toys are wholesome. Many parlor games promote discussion. Pictionary, for example, teaches children to follow rules, take turns, learn new words and communicate with symbols.

The play's the thing

Children want to play. Toys are perfect for play. In our busy world, we often abdicate our responsibilities as parents by using toys as a crutch to entertain our children while we do something else. Children respond favorably to parents and friends who interact with and pay attention to them. Playtimes can be fun and educational and can nurture familial ties.
Make your precious children's early years an experience they will treasure. In the world of the future, there will be the right kind of play with the right kind of toys, for “the streets of the city shall be full of boys and girls playing in its streets” (Zechariah 8:5). GN

You might also be interested in...

Friday, March 4, 2016

Spring Break Sex vs. Divine Light

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about teens, college students, and spring break. This follows this post about some of the problems of Detroit. This follows this post about the Pope and immigration. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.


In analyzing these questions, Time magazine writer Belinda Luscombe cites a litany of imprudent behavior by famous young ladies.
Girls behaving badly
Examples include recently published photos of a semi-clothed Miley Cyrus and the unwed pregnancies of Jamie Lynn Spears and Bristol Palin. Plus there are the “Gloucester Seventeen,” a group of high school girls in Massachusetts who agreed among themselves to get pregnant together.
Adding to real-life cases, the author cites fictitious young female personalities who behave just as badly—and often more explicitly. Characters from the television shows 90210 , Gossip Girl and The O.C. top the list, plus MTV hits like My Super Sweet 16 and Spring Break . Juno may be the most visible in a list of films that negatively influence teen girls.
There's not enough room in this commentary to fully address the ways in which this particular Time magazine article fails to properly handle the subject—but there is room to make two very important points.
Boy accountability
First, remember that Jamie Lynn Spears and Bristol Palin did not get pregnant by themselves, nor did the Gloucester Seventeen. Boys must be held accountable for immoral behavior just the same as girls.
Young men need to understand their proper role with young women—to respect their character and protect their purity. If a teenage guy wants to become a real man, he would never make sexual advances toward a girl or accept any advances that she might make toward him. Real men understand the value of saving themselves and their girlfriends for the incredible blessings of marriage.
Underestimating the media
Second, the Time writer fails to grasp the true danger of sexual content in modern media. She states that the link between how teen sexuality is portrayed in the media and the behavior of teen girls is “more complicated than Tracey see, Tracy do” (“The Truth About Teen Girls,” Sept. 22, 2008). That's a word play on “monkey see, monkey do” to describe how some imitate the actions of others without thinking.
While not every teen exposed to sexual content in news or entertainment apes the behavior he or she sees, that's no cause for the cold comfort implied by Ms. Luscombe. The problem with sexually suggestive or explicit material is that it fills the mind with images and sound bites that are incredibly difficult to un-see and un-hear.
Bright thinking vs. wrong sex
Jesus Christ said, “The lamp of the body is the eye. Therefore, when your eye is good, your whole body also is full of light. But when your eye is bad, your body also is full of darkness. Therefore take heed that the light which is in you is not darkness” (Luke 11:34-35).
Of greater concern than “Tracey see, Tracey do ” is the certainty that when Tracey sees, Tracey thinks . When you think about wrong behavior, you suffer a portion of the damaging consequences even if your thoughts never lead to actions. If wrong thoughts do lead to wrong actions, the damage suffered greatly increases.
Asking whether teen girls are becoming sexually active too early in life is the wrong question. Any young person, male or female, who engages in sexual activity before marriage is doing so too early!
The real question for a vertically thinking young person is, “What should I be thinking and how should I be acting so that I can save sex for my marriage?” Successfully answer this question and you'll never regret it! VT

You might also be interested in...


In a world that often devalues and dishonors women, where can a woman find...

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

One More Cheap Drug Problem

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about marijuana and other drugs. This follows this post about Russia's geography. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
Please follow me here for continued posts.


Young adults have found another substance to give them a rush, but it's rushing some to their graves. Ever vulnerable to the unscrupulous pushers of potions, young people in their late teens and early 20s are buying laughing gas to get high.
Known on the street as “hippie crack,” the gas is attractive in part because it is non-addictive and inexpensive. Laughing gas (nitrous oxide) is not a controlled substance, which means that it's legal to sell or possess it. Small gas canisters called whippets cost as little as 50 cents apiece and are sold with a tool and balloons. The tool is for cracking open the canister and dispensing its contents into the balloons for inhaling, called “huffing.”
Despite the obvious intended use of these items, distributors have skirted the law by labeling their packages, “for food use only.” (Nitrous oxide is the propellant in cans of whipping cream.) However, the death of a 20-year-old Virginia Tech student enabled prosecutors to successfully convict a Phoenix distributor on the technical charge of mislabeling the product.
About a dozen states have attempted to combat misuse of nitrous oxide by legislating stricter labeling and distribution guidelines.
A U.S. federal survey conducted in 1999 showed that its use as a recreational drug had increased 20 percent over the previous year. Nationwide, 6.6 million people had used it at least once. Further, the largest age group among new users was those 35 and older. A number of vendors blatantly sold balloons full of laughing gas at a professional football game tailgate party last fall.
Some readers will recall traveling carnivals that would sell a minute's worth of laughing gas for a few cents to the public. Users would laugh and act silly until the drug wore off, leaving them confused. Even that was probably irresponsible, but today's use is far from humorous.
Today's users sometimes mix it with marijuana and other drugs, seeking to enhance the impact of each. They also will tie a bag around their heads to increase the amount of gas they inhale, which is how the Virginia Tech student died. Nitrous oxide replaces the oxygen in the blood, and a person asphyxiates. Because it is an anesthetic, users are not aware that they are in danger.
The gas can cause people to lose motor control so rapidly that they fall over. A Dateline NBC segment on nitrous oxide huffing showed a Phoenix teenage girl passing out and falling to the ground at a rave party.
Scientists have found that regular use can cause reproductive problems. A 1992 New England Journal of Medicine study revealed that women exposed to high levels of nitrous oxide in their jobs as dental assistants faced a greater risk of infertility. Prolonged use is also believed to damage the bone marrow and the nervous system, due to a diminished ability to process vitamin B-12.
Sources: The Arizona Republic ; www.drweil.com

Friday, March 14, 2014

Is Elizabeth Munoz a Serial Killer? Hispanic El Paso Woman Allegedly Murdered Her Second Boyfriend in Six Years; Why was She Free?


A timely post about from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com about a crime in the border town of El Paso, something to think about during Spring Break. This follows this post about holding IRS chief Lois Lerner in Contempt of Congress.  In the meantime, you can get more involved if you like here and read an interesting book HERE.
You can follow me at blogspot here and at twitter here https://twitter.com/brianleesblog. Please consider following both in case one goes down!

Is Elizabeth Munoz a Serial Killer? Hispanic El Paso Woman Allegedly Murdered Her Second Boyfriend in Six Years; Why was She Free?


El Paso Police Department mug shot of an Elizabeth Muñoz, who was arrested on October 17, 2012, for DWI


By Nicholas Stix

I thank the Texas reader who sent me this article, remarking,
“A 33-year-old woman convicted of fatally stabbing her common-law husband seven years ago was arrested Sunday night for allegedly stabbing to death her boyfriend during the weekend at a Lower Valley public housing complex.”

All the dirt poor border Mexicans live in "public" housing.

Guess who pays for this "public" housing?

Affirmative action I: Senorita Munoz is either here illegally—the El Paso Times wouldn’t mention her citizenship status—or she benefited from a previous amnesty. Everyone with a Spanish name in border town El Paso who isn’t some kind of grandee is either illegal or an amnesty beneficiary.

Affirmative action II: When Munoz murdered her boyfriend, Francisco Arceo, 24, she was charged and convicted only of aggravated assault, instead of murder, and did minimal jail time.

Affirmative action III: She was jailed under a measly $250,000 bond for her second alleged murder.


El Paso woman suspected of killing boyfriend with tattoo instrument
Court records show she was convicted of killing common-law husband in 2007
By Daniel Borunda / El Paso Times
Posted: 3/04/2014 12:13:28 A.M. MST
El Paso Times

A 33-year-old woman convicted of fatally stabbing her common-law husband seven years ago was arrested Sunday night for allegedly stabbing to death her boyfriend during the weekend at a Lower Valley public housing complex.

El Paso police detectives arrested Elizabeth Muñoz on suspicion of murder in connection with the fatal stabbing of Raul Robles, 31, on Saturday at the Alvarez apartments, 8247 N. Loop, officials said. Court documents stated that Muñoz allegedly killed Robles by stabbing him in the neck with a tattoo instrument.

About 3:30 p.m. Saturday, police responding to a fight call found Robles bleeding from the neck and laying on the ground behind an apartment, according to a complaint affidavit filed by a detective. Robles, who lived in Chaparral, was taken to Del Sol Medical Center where he died of his wounds.

The complaint affidavit stated that witnesses had seen Robles and Muñoz, who was described as his girlfriend, having an argument and fighting before the stabbing. A witness saw three men assault Robles.

"However, once the victim (Robles) was on the ground and unconscious, the defendant (Muñoz) approached the victim and began to stab the victim numerous times with an unknown object," the affidavit stated. "Another witness observed the defendant standing over the victim as he laid on the ground bleeding."

The affidavit stated that Muñoz allegedly admitted to detectives that she stabbed Robles twice on the neck with a tattoo instrument that he owned. The document does not say what the pair were arguing about.

Muñoz, of the 200 block of North Davis Drive, was jailed under a $250,000 bond. [A convicted killer accused of her second murder, and only $250,000? The part-black Oregon guy accused of molesting boys was jailed on $1.7 million bond.] A police spokesman said Muñoz [sic] photo was not released because the investigation continues into what is El Paso's second homicide of the year.

It is not the first time that Muñoz, who is listed on jail records as being 5 feet, 1 inch tall and 136 pounds, is accused of killing a man.

In September 2007, Muñoz used a knife to fatally stab her common-law husband, Francisco Arceo, 24, during a fight at their home on Clark Street in Central El Paso, according to court records.

El Paso Times archives report Muñoz was initially arrested on a murder charge in Arceo's death. A grand jury indicted her on a charge of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

[But that’s ridiculous. Ag assault is for an extremely violent attack, usually with a weapon, which the victim survives. Let me guess: The grand jury was packed with sympathetic Mexicans. Although, when it comes down to it, white women are also pretty much useless as jurors.]

The case was prosecuted by the El Paso County Attorney's Office because of a possible conflict of interest because the District Attorney's Office had prosecuted a case were [sic] Muñoz was allegedly a victim of domestic violence.

In December 2008, Muñoz pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with deadly weapon and was sentenced by Judge Patrick Garcia to five years in state prison.

[Of which she served how much time? Maybe two years?]

Daniel Borunda may be reached at 915-546-6102.