How Many Emmett Tills Have There Been?

A very interesting post from http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com about Emmit Till in perspective. This follows this post about some of America's problems.   This follows this post about some of the music that was poplular during 2011. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!

How Many Emmett Tills Have There Been?



Emmett Till at age 14, six months before he was murdered


Emmett Till and his mother, Mamie, 1954


Carolyn Bryant, the married white woman who claimed that Till had molested her



By Nicholas Stix



Emmett Till was murdered by racist brutes in Mississippi 57 years ago, for flirting with a married white woman. But there have been many Emmet Tills since, innocent victims of murderous racists.



Here are but 16 of them.

http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com/2012/06/7-more-white-emmet-tills-white-victims.html
(BLOGGERS NOTE: CLICK THIS LINK ABOVE FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE STORIES BELOW)

Black racism, and race hatred of non blacks is real,virulent, and commonplace. There is plenty of evidence of this.




Although the violent black racists surely are a minority of the total black population, plenty of them are evident by their statements and writings, and evident in the interracial violent crime statistics



It is the goal of this blog to honestly address the documented evidence of this black racism and race hatred, knowing full well that the subject is taboo in the "liberal" Dogma, and that puts this blog at considerable risk being shut down for even raising the issue.



In doing so, this blog will also document evidence of the Corrupt Liberal Media ignoring, spinning away, or even censoring this widespread, black racism and hatred of non blacks from the American people.





Hopefully the moderators at Google have enough intellectual honesty and integrity to resist the totalitarian efforts from the left to shut it down.



Scroll down the page for photos and posts



These crime cases are only a small fraction of the black on white violent crime, most of it motivated by race hatred. By contrast, white on black violent crime in modern times is extremely rare. Just try to find examples of it on the internet and you will see just how rare it is!



For perspective, a total of 40 people were murdered by white racists in the South in the Civil Rights Era, 1954 to 1968, according the the national Civil Rights Memorial LINK





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell







"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King





"We can easily understand a child for being afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when adults are afraid of the light" Plato

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Archive directory



Speeches,videos, and writings of black racism and race hatred LINK





Black race hatred and the mass murder of 188 whites LINK



Mixed motives and further research LINK





Black race hatred in "street crime" 301 whites murdered by 24 black serial killers LINK





112 killed by affirmative action LINK , 506 whites murdered in their own home LINK





487 different, documented attacks for being white on a public street, 340 murdered LINK





104 elderly white women hate raped/murdered by black offenders LINK





104 whites murdered by blacks in 12 massacres LINK





347 whites attacked in the workplace, 319 murdered by black thugs LINK





13 "White Emmet Tills" LINK











Black men and white women , intimate partner homicide .........Jan 15th, 2012 to Jan 31, 2012



Black men and white women, rape, murder,and sexual homicide....... Feb 2, 2012 and later





---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------













Tuesday, June 26, 201213 white "Emmet Tills"; White victims brutally beaten or murdered for "disrespecting" racist black thugs









Emmet Till is a famous black victim of white racist violence.





Till was brutally murdered in Mississippi in 1955 for flirting with a white woman.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till





Put in the parlance of the 21st century, Till "dissed"or "disrespected" the white racist thug by flirting with his wife.



From the Urban Dictionary:



"diss"









A shortened version of "disrespect"

Example "Why you be dissin' me?"



http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=diss









Emmet Till age 14 six months before he was murdered





Just how well known in history is Emmet Till?





Till continues to be the focus of literature and memorials. A statue was unveiled in Denver in 1976 (and has since been moved to Pueblo, Colorado) featuring Till with Martin Luther King, Jr. Till was included among the forty names of people who had died in the Civil Rights Movement (listed as martyrs[104]) on the granite sculpture of the Civil Rights Memorial in Montgomery, Alabama, dedicated in 1989. In 1991, a 7-mile (11 km) stretch of 71st Street in Chicago, was renamed "Emmett Till Road".



James McCosh Elementary School in Chicago, where Till had been a student, was renamed the "Emmett Louis Till Math And Science Academy" in 2005.[106] The "Emmett Till Memorial Highway" was dedicated between Greenwood and Tutwiler, Mississippi, the same route his body took to the train station on its way to Chicago. It intersects with the H. C. "Clarence" Strider Memorial Highway.[107]

In 2007, Tallahatchie County issued a formal apology to Till's family, reading "We the citizens of Tallahatchie County recognize that the Emmett Till case was a terrible miscarriage of justice. We state candidly and with deep regret the failure to effectively pursue justice. We wish to say to the family of Emmett Till that we are profoundly sorry for what was done in this community to your loved one."[108] The same year, Georgia congressman John Lewis, sponsored a bill that provides a plan for investigating and prosecuting unsolved Civil Rights era murders. The Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crime Act was signed into law in 2008.[109]



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till



The name and story of Emmet Till is also etched in stone at the National Civil Rights Memorial which lists a total of 40 people murdered by the Klan and their supporters in the South from 1954 to 1968 LINK



The murder of Emmet Till is one of the most widely know examples of white racist violence against blacks yet there are dozens of white "Emmit Tills" who have been, brutal beaten and murdered for "dissing" racist blacks that are almost totally unremembered today.. These 8 white Emmett Tills listed below are just a small fraction of the thousands of whites who been murdered by black thugs since then.









Thomas Cunningham Murdered in front of his young daughter when his dog "dissed" a black thug by sniffing him.





Chris Kernich, Beaten to death after he "dissed" some black thugs by yelling "Watch where you are going" after almost being run down by their car.





Evelyn Wagler Burned alive for "dissing" black thugs by being seen walking on the sidewalk.





Darrel Johnson Beaten to death for "dissing" 3 black thugs by walking with a cane near his home.





James Wilbur Lybrand III Shot in the head for"dissing" black thugs by walking on a public street.





Troy Knapp Beaten to death for dissing a black mob by riding his bicycle on a public street



Jerry Newington Brutally stomped to death by black mob for dissing them with his presence on a public street



Wendy Fisher. Gunned down by a black thug in front of her home for "disrespecting him by yelling at his speeding car to slow down after it nearly ran over her dog



Kennia Durran and Julian Soler, both murdered in cold blood despite being helpless and cooperating with their attackers. Male victim "dissed" black thug because he "didnt seem scared enough" so they were gunned down.









3 more white Emmet Tills at this LINK





Andrew Arosemena Shot in the head and murdered for dissing a car full of blacks blocking the exit of a parking garage by telling them to "Hurry up"





Carl Berry Beaten to death for dissing a group of 6 black thugs with the wrong kind of eye contact.





Gordon Rees Jr. Gunned down on the street for dissing blacks in a car driving recklessly by yelling for them to slow down

Understanding the China-Japan Island Conflict

A very interesting post from www.Stratfor.com  analyzing the conflict between China and Japan. This follows this post analyzing China.  This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries such as Iran . For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and read a very interesting book HERE.


Understanding the China-Japan Island Conflict

September 25, 2012


Stratfor

By Rodger Baker

Vice President of East Asia Analysis



Sept. 29 will mark 40 years of normalized diplomatic relations between China and Japan, two countries that spent much of the 20th century in mutual enmity if not at outright war. The anniversary comes at a low point in Sino-Japanese relations amid a dispute over an island chain in the East China Sea known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan and Diaoyu Islands in China.



These islands, which are little more than uninhabited rocks, are not particularly valuable on their own. However, nationalist factions in both countries have used them to enflame old animosities; in China, the government has even helped organize the protests over Japan's plan to purchase and nationalize the islands from their private owner. But China's increased assertiveness is not limited only to this issue. Beijing has undertaken a high-profile expansion and improvement of its navy as a way to help safeguard its maritime interests, which Japan -- an island nation necessarily dependent on access to sea-lanes -- naturally views as a threat. Driven by its economic and political needs, China's expanded military activity may awaken Japan from the pacifist slumber that has characterized it since the end of World War II.



An Old Conflict's New Prominence

The current tensions surrounding the disputed islands began in April. During a visit to the United States, Tokyo Gov. Shintaro Ishihara, a hard-line nationalist known for his 1989 book The Japan That Can Say No, which advocated for a stronger international role for Japan not tied to U.S. interests or influence, said that the Tokyo municipal government was planning to buy three of the five Senkaku/Diaoyu islands from their private Japanese owner. Ishihara's comments did little to stir up tensions at the time, but subsequent efforts to raise funds and press forward with the plan drew the attention and ultimately the involvement of the Japanese central government. The efforts also gave China a way to distract from its military and political standoff with the Philippines over control of parts of the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea.



For decades, Tokyo and Beijing generally abided by a tacit agreement to keep the islands dispute quiet. Japan agreed not to carry out any new construction or let anyone land on the islands; China agreed to delay assertion of any claim to the islands and not let the dispute interfere with trade and political relations. Although flare-ups occurred, usually triggered by some altercation between the Japanese coast guard and Chinese fishing vessels or by nationalist Japanese or Chinese activists trying to land on the islands, the lingering territorial dispute played only a minor role in bilateral relations.



However, Ishihara's plans for the Tokyo municipal government to take over the islands and eventually build security outposts there forced the Japanese government's hand. Facing domestic political pressure to secure Japan's claim to the islands, the government determined that the "nationalization" of the islands was the least contentious option. By keeping control over construction and landings, the central government would be able to keep up its side of the tacit agreement with China on managing the islands.



China saw Japan's proposed nationalization as an opportunity to exploit. Even as Japan was debating what action to take, China began stirring up anti-Japanese sentiment and Beijing tacitly backed the move by a group of Hong Kong activists in August to sail to and land on the disputed islands. At the same time, Beijing prevented a Chinese-based fishing vessel from attempting the same thing, using Hong Kong's semi-autonomous status as a way to distance itself from the action and retain greater flexibility in dealing with Japan.



As expected, the Japanese coast guard arrested the Hong Kong activists and impounded their ship, but Tokyo also swiftly released them to avoid escalating tensions. Less than a month later, after Japan's final decision to purchase the islands from their private Japanese owner, anti-Japanese protests swept China, in many places devolving into riots and vandalism targeting Japanese products and companies. Although many of these protests were stage-managed by the government, the Chinese began to clamp down when some demonstrations got out of control. While still exploiting the anti-Japanese rhetoric, Chinese state-run media outlets have highlighted local governments' efforts to identify and punish protesters who turned violent and warn that nationalist pride is no excuse for destructive behavior.



Presently, both China and Japan are working to keep the dispute within manageable parameters after a month of heightened tensions. China has shifted to disrupting trade with Japan on a local level, with some Japanese products reportedly taking much longer to clear customs, while Japan has dispatched a deputy foreign minister for discussions with Beijing. Chinese maritime surveillance ships continue to make incursions into the area around the disputed islands, and there are reports of hundreds or even thousands of Chinese fishing vessels in the East China Sea gathered near the waters around the islands, but both Japan and China appear to be controlling their actions. Neither side can publicly give in on its territorial stance, and both are looking for ways to gain politically without allowing the situation to degrade further.



Political Dilemmas in Beijing and Tokyo

The islands dispute is occurring as China and Japan, the world's second- and third-largest economies, are both experiencing political crises at home and facing uncertain economic paths forward. But the dispute also reflects the very different positions of the two countries in their developmental history and in East Asia's balance of power.



China, the emerging power in Asia, has seen decades of rapid economic growth but is now confronted with a systemic crisis, one already experienced by Japan in the early 1990s and by South Korea and the other Asian tigers later in the decade. China is reaching the limits of the debt-financed, export-driven economic model and must now deal with the economic and social consequences of this change. That this comes amid a once-in-a-decade leadership transition only exacerbates China's political unease as it debates options for transitioning to a more sustainable economic model. But while China's economic expansion may have plateaued, its military development is still growing.



The Chinese military is becoming a more modern fighting force, more active in influencing Chinese foreign policy and more assertive of its role regionally. The People's Liberation Army Navy on Sept. 23 accepted the delivery of China's first aircraft carrier, and the ship serves as a symbol of the country's military expansion. While Beijing views the carrier as a tool to assert Chinese interests regionally (and perhaps around the globe over the longer term) in the same manner that the United States uses its carrier fleet, for now China has only one, and the country is new to carrier fleet and aviation operations. Having a single carrier offers perhaps more limitations than opportunities for its use, all while raising the concerns and inviting reaction from neighboring states.



Japan, by contrast, has seen two decades of economic malaise characterized by a general stagnation in growth, though not necessarily a devolution of overall economic power. Still, it took those two decades for the Chinese economy, growing at double-digit rates, to even catch the Japanese economy. Despite the malaise, there is plenty of latent strength in the Japanese economy. Japan's main problem is its lack of economic dynamism, a concern that is beginning to be reflected in Japanese politics, where new forces are rising to challenge the political status quo. The long-dominant Liberal Democratic Party lost power to the opposition Democratic Party of Japan in 2009, and both mainstream parties are facing new challenges from independents, non-traditional candidates and the emerging regionalist parties, which espouse nationalism and call for a more aggressive foreign policy.



Even before the rise of the regionalist parties, Japan had begun moving slowly but inexorably from its post-World War II military constraints. With China's growing military strength, North Korea's nuclear weapons program and even South Korean military expansion, Japan has cautiously watched as the potential threats to its maritime interests have emerged, and it has begun to take action. The United States, in part because it wants to share the burden of maintaining security with its allies, has encouraged Tokyo's efforts to take a more active role in regional and international security, commensurate with Japan's overall economic influence.



Concurrent with Japan's economic stagnation, the past two decades have seen the country quietly reform its Self-Defense Forces, expanding the allowable missions as it re-interprets the country's constitutionally mandated restrictions on offensive activity. For example, Japan has raised the status of the defense agency to the defense ministry, expanded joint training operations within its armed forces and with their civilian counterparts, shifted its views on the joint development and sale of weapons systems, integrated more heavily with U.S. anti-missile systems and begun deploying its own helicopter carriers.



Contest for East Asian Supremacy

China is struggling with the new role of the military in its foreign relations, while Japan is seeing a slow re-emergence of the military as a tool of its foreign relations. China's two-decade-plus surge in economic growth is reaching its logical limit, yet given the sheer size of China's population and its lack of progress switching to a more consumption-based economy, Beijing still has a long way to go before it achieves any sort of equitable distribution of resources and benefits. This leaves China's leaders facing rising social tensions with fewer new resources at their disposal. Japan, after two decades of society effectively agreeing to preserve social stability at the cost of economic restructuring and upheaval, is now reaching the limits of its patience with a bureaucratic system that is best known for its inertia.



Both countries are seeing a rise in the acceptability of nationalism, both are envisioning an increasingly active role for their militaries, and both occupy the same strategic space. With Washington increasing its focus on the Asia-Pacific region, Beijing is worried that a resurgent Japan could assist the United States on constraining China in an echo of the Cold War containment strategy.



We are now seeing the early stage of another shift in Asian power. It is perhaps no coincidence that the 1972 re-establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Japan followed U.S. President Richard Nixon's historic visit to China. The Senkaku/Diaoyu islands were not even an issue at the time, since they were still under U.S. administration. Japan's defense was largely subsumed by the United States, and Japan had long ago traded away its military rights for easy access to U.S. markets and U.S. protection. The shift in U.S.-China relations opened the way for the rapid development of China-Japan relations.



The United States' underlying interest is maintaining a perpetual balance between Asia's two key powers so neither is able to challenging Washington's own primacy in the Pacific. During World War II, this led the United States to lend support to China in its struggle against imperial Japan. The United States' current role backing a Japanese military resurgence against China's growing power falls along the same line. As China lurches into a new economic cycle, one that will very likely force deep shifts in the country's internal political economy, it is not hard to imagine China and Japan's underlying geopolitical balance shifting again. And when that happens, so too could the role of the United States.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Print 112 89 363 46 Reprinting or republication of this report on websites is authorized by prominently displaying the following sentence, including the hyperlink to Stratfor, at the beginning or end of the report.

"Understanding the China-Japan Island Conflict is republished with permission of Stratfor." .



Read more: Understanding the China-Japan Island Conflict
Stratfor

In Brief...World News Review A Divorce at the Click of a Mouse

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about easy divorce. This follows this post about India and China.  For a free magazine subscription or to get this book for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886-8632.

In Brief...World News Review A Divorce at the Click of a Mouse






article by Cecil Maranville, Peter Eddington





Warring couples in Britain can now end their marriage quickly and cheaply-using the Internet.



Warring couples in Britain can now end their marriage quickly and cheaply-using the Internet.



For just £79.99, couples can file divorce papers with the click of a mouse-if neither partner contests the split.



In its first week, more than 300 British couples downloaded papers from the site-potentially saving hundreds or even thousands of pounds in solicitors' fees and court costs.



The petition, affidavit and decree nisi are drafted, based on answers users give to a series of questions on-line. On-line lawyers check the details and send the forms to the court.



Patricia Hardcastle, spokeswoman for the Roman Catholic Church, described the service as "repellent."



"There's something very impersonal about having to do it on-line. Nobody wants to go through it, but at least we had to do everything face-to-face, which might have made people stop and think," she said.



But Richard Cohen, legal director of the Desktop Lawyer service, said: "Just because it's easy, it doesn't mean it's going to incite people to get divorced. Up till now people had to use a solicitor; we've made a daunting task a bit easier," he told The Observer (1999 Sky Online, July 29,1999).

.

EXCLUSIVE: Homeland Security Agents Forced to do Muslim Sensitivity Training on Eve of 9/11

A very interesting post from www.debbieschlussel.com about the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. This follows this post about the abuse of the ambassador in Libya. This follows this post about a movie used as an excuse for Muslims to murder.  This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries such as Iran . For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and read a very interesting book HERE.

EXCLUSIVE: Homeland Security Agents Forced to do Muslim Sensitivity Training on Eve of 9/11


By Debbie Schlussel



While Muslims around the world were planning coordinated attacks on our U.S. Embassies around the world on the 11th anniversary of 9/11, Homeland Security’s top New England official, Bruce Foucart, was busy forcing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to attend Muslim sensitivity training. ICE agents were outraged that Foucart, Boston’s ICE Special Agent in Charge, was forcing them not to remember 3,000 Americans targeted for death by Muslims, but instead, to honor the religion that inspired the massacre. Last week, on September 10th, Foucart sent all of ICE’s New England agents e-mails (see below) telling them they are required to attend the course, “Improving Cultural Competence: Engaging and Building Relations with American Muslims.” (Note that American is merely an adjective. They are Muslims first, always, and only.) It’s mandatory.



Bruce Foucart, Homeland Security’s Top New England Cop, Helps Bin Laden Live On





(Jihadist Security Artwork by Fred Taub/Boycott Watch)



You’d think that Americans learned plenty about Islam from the events of 9/11, the Fort Hood massacre, the attempted shoe bombing, underwear bombing, and Times Square bombing, the U.S.S. Cole, Khobar Towers, and Beirut Embassy and Marine barracks bombings, and the seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Iran and hostage-taking for 444 days. And that’s not to mention Yasser Arafat’s brutal murder of Cleo Noel and George Curtis Moore, our two diplomats in Sudan (in which they were so badly beaten and tortured that authorities could not tell which of them was Black–at the time Moore was the highest ranking Black U.S. diplomat–and which was White). But not for Bruce Foucart, who thinks agents need to know the cuddly, tender, sensitive side of Islam (you know, the one we saw in the four dead bodies coming out of the U.S. Embassy in Libya, last week!).



CLICK ON THE IMAGE to read the whole thing . . .





Here is what rightfully disgusted ICE agents who work for Foucart are telling me:



On the eve of September 11th, an email was sent out to the employees and agents of the Boston Office of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Office of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the investigative arm of Homeland Security, making attendance mandatory for all employees and agents to attend “Improving Cultural Competence: Engaging and Building Relations with Muslims”. The Special Agent in Charge of the Boston office, Bruce Foucart, made the training mandatory and ordered this email sent out to all personnel.



The timing, tone and subject matter of this email couldn’t be more inappropriate considering several employees of this office were in New York City on 9/11 and intimately involved in the tragedy and recovery effort.













Employees who have attended this training before have stated it has nothing to do working together, but instead, consists of Muslims instructing ICE agents and employees how to address them with respect, telling them that law enforcement has created all of the negative persona and that we need to learn their culture and language.



This story needs to be told, morale has reached levels never seen before in this office thanks to the local management.



It’s disgusting. Did we have German sensitivity training during World War II, taught by the German-American Bund? Hell no! And, yet, the Nazis were pikers compared to the Muslims and the murderous savagery and instability they’ve wrought around the world. We defeated the Nazis in only a few years, and the Muslims have been after us for centuries, attacking America for decades.









Actual DHS Recruitment Ad



No federal law enforcement agency ever had Italian sensitivity training for the La Cosa Nostra (though most Italian-Americans opposed the Mafia, and only a tiny, infinitesimal fraction of Italian-Americans were involved in the Mob, unlike the majority of Muslims who openly support Islamic terrorism and murder), Irish sensitivity training for bootlegging during the prohibition (and, again, unlike Muslims in America, only an invisible fraction of a fraction of Irish in America were involved in this and most opposed it, whereas most Muslims openly support Islamic violence, including Hezbollah and HAMAS), or Jewish sensitivity training for the Purple Gang (which lasted only a few years and involved less than a couple hundred people, as opposed to several million hard-working, law-abiding Jews who opposed them and their activities). They just went after them, and yet, none of these groups targeted innocent civilians or murdered even a fraction of the Americans (and other innocent civilians around the world) that Muslims have.









Partners in Islamo-Pandering: DHS Chief Janet Napolitano & Flamboyant ICE Chief John (Moron) Morton



It’s ridiculous. Whether we want to believe it or not, Islam–and Muslims–are at war against the West. You don’t win a war by forcing your soldiers–which include federal agents–to sit there and be demoralized by the enemy on American soil. You don’t win a war by forcing federal agents to hear how bad they are and how they must treat the enemy with respect.



Bruce Foucart might win some awards from the unindicted HAMAS co-conspirator CAIR for trying to emasculate his employees and demoralize them at the hands of Muslims and Islam. But he is doing America no favors.



Back in the 1940s, his behavior would be considered treason. And that’s exactly what it is now.



By the way, while this is easy to pawn off on Obama, this went on for 7.5 years under Bush, and it will continue under Romney, too. Sadly, the only leaders in this country who have the cojones to speak out against this crap are Allen West and Michele Bachmann.



Shukran [Thank You in Arabic], Honorary Brother Bruce Foucart, for Doing allah’s Will! . . .


Sexy Palestinian Muslim on Ramallah Street Cheers 9/11 Attacks

Memo From Mexico | Will "Returning Migrants" Remake Mexico—Or Take US Southwest Back With Them?

A very interesting post from www.Vdare.com about Mexican nationals who leave the U.S. This follows this post about corruption as a way of life in Mexico while only an occasional event in the U.S.  This follows this article about American energy independence and preventing money from going to hostile countries such as Iran . For more that you can do to get involved click HERE and read this very interesting book HERE.

Memo From Mexico

Will "Returning Migrants" Remake Mexico—Or Take US Southwest Back With Them?

http://www.vdare.com/articles/memo-from-mexico-by-allan-wall-67

By Allan Wall on August 4, 2008 at 1:00am

Ending mass illegal immigration, and drastically reducing legal immigration is necessary for the survival of the United States as we know it. These things must be done.

But reforming our immigration policy is going to involve a lot of Mexicans in the U.S. going back home to Mexico. What happens to Mexicans who return to Mexico? And what would happen to Mexico if all the Mexicans in the U.S. went home?

I've been arguing for years that closing our border would help Mexico, principally by cutting off the safety valve which allows the Mexican government to avoid real reform.

Right now, for example, Mexican lawmakers are continuing to dither over the anemic reforms President Calderon has proposed for the Mexican state oil monopoly PEMEX. But even those anemic reforms are too much for leftist Mexican politicians.

Imagine though, if the northern safety valve were definitely closed. Is it possible they might be more serious about reforming their petroleum sector?

Well, maybe, maybe not. But we have to do what we have to do anyway.

Supposing we do get control of our border and drastically cut immigration as we should. In the short run, it's going to be tough for Mexico, because the whole society has become addicted to mass emigration to the United States. Just as with a drug addict, withdrawal is not easy.

Being a (legal) resident of Mexico myself—in full compliance with Mexican immigration law—I've met deported illegal aliens here in Mexico. I've even had them come to my door asking for alms.

Once in a bus station, a recently-deported illegal alien asked me for money so he could eat. Concerned that he might use cash for a harmful substance, and since I had some time to spare anyway, I took him across the street and bought him something to eat. This also gave us the chance to chat.

Despite the fact that he'd recently been deported, he wasn't bitter. He spoke about his experience in a rather matter-of-fact manner, as the deportees I've spoken to usually do. I've spoken to usually do.I've spoken to usually do. I asked him where he was from in Mexico, and if there were any jobs there. Yes, there were, he replied. Not, however, at the wage rates he can work for in the U.S..

Mexicans who return from the U.S. are a varied lot. Some barely spent time in the country, having been detained upon entry. Others have spent years north of the border, and returned voluntarily after accumulating a large sum of money. Some of those returning are just plain criminals, as the Attorney General of Baja California recently pointed out.

Some are just going to cause trouble in Mexico (as they did in the U.S.). On the other hand, some can make positive contributions to Mexico's development.

A recent article by Jeremy Schwartz deals with one class of returnees – those who are getting into politics . Returning migrants remaking Mexico through politics, [Austin American-Statesman, June 22, 2008], is subtitled "Migrants are coming home from U.S. with dollars, ideas and little patience for the old way of doing things".

It's a rather upbeat article about the contributions returning migrants make to Mexican society. But at the same time it raises some difficult questions about sovereignty and citizenship.

Schwartz is focusing on Mexicans who have lived for years in the U.S., who have returned to Mexico and are getting into local politics in rural areas. Most returning migrants are not running for office in Mexico, but it does represent a phenomenon that helps us see the big picture. Here's how Schwartz sums it up:



"In isolated pockets throughout Mexico, especially in far-flung rural areas, groups of migrants are entering the political arena. For many returning migrants, the lessons they learned in places such as Austin are guiding their forays into politics. Before they left Mexico for the United States, many of them were the poorest, and often the least educated, residents of their towns and villages. They are returning with dollars, ideas and little patience for the old way of doing things".



This is potentially a good thing. Rural Mexico is the least developed, most-ignored and underdeveloped sector of the economy, having suffered years of government mismanagement and misguided socialist policies.

Schwartz begins the article with a description of Seir Benitez, who came from the state of Mexico. As is typical of contemporary journalistic style, you have to read a ways down to figure out what's going on :



"Seir Benítez left this remote town high in the Sierra Madre mountains 12 years ago in hopes of escaping a harsh life in its dusty fields. He traded dramatic mountain views and grinding poverty for an apartment in Austin and a job in a tool factory. He spent eight years in the United States, venturing as far as Florida and Nebraska, before returning home with enough money to build a house. Benítez, 28, also came back filled with new ideas of how Luvianos, in the state of Mexico, should be governed. He is considering a run for mayor, joining a wave of politically active migrants who many in Mexico believe have the potential to reshape the countryside. 'I want to create jobs so that other young people don't have to migrate,' said Benítez, who works for Luvianos' city government and peppers his conversation with references to Austin's flea markets and Riverside Drive restaurants."



Schwartz' article includes another profile of some returning migrants in the southern state of Guerrero, one of Mexico's poorest states, and explores the situation in the central Mexican state of Zacatecas.

Zacatecas is a bellwether state for several reasons. For one thing, it has an extremely high rate of emigration.

Indeed, "high rate of emigration" just doesn't do justice to the Zacatecas situation. It's ground zero for the "Mexodus"—and "mass exodus" is the only term for what's happened. It's estimated that half the state's population of 1.8 million lives outside of Zacatecas. About a million Zacatecans reside in the U.S.A.

The state has also been a pioneer in the rise of migrant political power. In 2003, Zacatecans living in the United States gained the right to run for office in Mexico while living in the U.S. The unicameral Zacatecas state legislature now includes two seats (out of 30) specifically reserved to represent Zacatecans residing in the U.S.

One of the most colorful Zacatecas characters is Andres Bermudez, aka the "Tomato King". Bermudez became a wealthy man raising tomatoes in California, and fought for years to be able to run for mayor in his home town of Jerez, Zacatecas. Mexican residency laws for candidates tend to be strict, so he wasn't able to. But after the Zacatecas law was changed in 2003, Bermudez won the election for mayor of Jerez in 2004, promising to make the town into a "little United States".

But everything didn't go smoothly for The Tomato King. Accused by the locals as being dictatorial, in turn he blamed his problems on entrenched local interests.

Maybe both sides were right. After all, there is a built-in conflict between returning migrants, loaded with money, and the traditional local authorities. It's inevitable in a country where emigration has been so widespread.


In Michoacan, another Mexican state with a high rate of emigration, migrants have also gained political power. Last year Luis Magana, a michoacano resident in California ran for governor of Michoacan. [Border no barrier for long-shot candidate  citizen runs in U.S. for Mexican state governorship. By Susan Ferriss, Sacramento Bee, August 15, 2007] Like Zacatecas, the Michoacan legislature now has seats reserved for U.S. residents.
As time goes by, if more states authorize designated emigrant seats, you will see more and more examples of dual U.S.- Mexican citizens living in the U.S. yet running for office in Mexico.

An even more ambitious program has been suggested for the Mexican Congress, and was supported by 2006 presidential candidate Lopez Obrador. It would enlarge the Mexican Congress to include an entire delegation of federal lawmakers exclusively to represent Mexicans living in the United States. It would be called the Sexta Circunscripción Electoral—the 6^th electoral super-district. For a circunscripción map of Mexico, click here and count them, there are 5. Therefore, the Sexta Circunscripción basically consists of the millions of Mexicans living in U.S. territory.

Certainly, this constitutes a loss of sovereignty for the U.S., which would then undeniably be hosting a colonizing Fifth Column.

But it also constitutes a loss of sovereignty for Mexico.

Just imagine if every Mexican in the U.S., including dual citizens, were registered to vote and voted in Mexican elections. This would effectively make Mexicans residing in the U.S. the kingmakers of Mexican elections.

In other words, people residing outside of Mexico would be deciding Mexican elections. Maybe the majority of Mexicans, who still reside in Mexico and have to live with the consequences of Mexican elections, would resent that.

It all fits in, though, with today's transnational politics.

Mexican candidates have campaigned in U.S. territory and Mexican political parties organize in the U.S. John McCain has visited Mexico in what is essentially a campaign visit—over the July 4^th holiday! And now Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, visited Mexico recently to raise funds among American expatriates. [Obama's sister wooing expats in Mexico, By Jeremy Schwartz, Austin American-Statesman, July 17, 2008] (I didn't contribute).

The politics of Mexico and the U.S., against the wishes of most citizens of each country, are becoming entangled in an increasingly complex web. And it's getting more and more difficult to untangle.

American citizen Allan Wall (email him) resides in Mexico, with a legal permit issued him by the Mexican government. In 2005, Allan served a tour of duty in Iraq with the Texas Army National Guard. His VDARE.COM articles are archived here; his Mexidata.info articles are archived here and his website is here.

Can We Save America?

A very interesting post from www.badeagle.com about some of America's problems. This follows this post about Mitt Romney's election problems.  This follows this post about some of the music that was poplular during 2011. This follows THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to chosing good movies to watch yourself!

Can We Save America?


by David Yeagley



Is there any hope for America? As we approach the new year, 2012, do we have any reason to expect anything different or better in the future? Is there any evidence that anything will change in Washington?



No, no, and no. Only the most naïve and blind person would think that America will recover. Politicians and conservative radio talkers may campaign and entertain with the idea of restoration; optimism is wondrously marketable–especially in times of horrible social depression; there may be a great temptation to hope, and even a moral obligation to make efforts towards rejuvenation. Yet, the basic steps required to restore America will never be taken. Human nature abuses everything America has ever stood for. We deny ourselves the remedy. Recovery is disallowed.



I would suggest a few steps, for the record, nevertheless. And these suggestions will never be more than fleeting notions of reality. What our society needs is immediate consequences for wrong doing, not enabling, not encouragement, not reward. Just consequence. How likely is that? So, call these suggestions something like the last nail in the coffin of dead hope.



Voting rights must be limited to qualified people.





The secret of Communism’s success in this country is the voting populace. The right to vote, in the name of “democracy” or “equality,” is actually a delusion, and secures the very lowest, more inefficient, self-destructive policies for the country. Mass voting destroys the character of the candidates, and, in order to secure the most votes, the politician promises the most material prosperity to the most people. The United States government has been growing like a cancer since the Civil War, and more and more people have become dependent on the government.



Therefore, the solution is to disallow most people from voting. Most people are uninformed, misinformed, selfish, and unfit even to be citizens, let alone voting citizens–with a say in any government whatsoever. There must be rigid qualification for voting.



The Right to Reproduction must be Limited



This isn’t about abortion. This is about sterilization. Sterilization is logical and rational in the matter of population control. Abortion is not socially rational. Mass sterilization is. A person who brings another human being into this world knowing that he cannot provide for it, knowing that the government will pay for it, is a criminal, and should lose all his freedom, and certainly his right to vote. No such offspring should ever be allowed to vote, either–unless he proves himself a very different kind of person.



Nothing is more useless and demoralizing that dependents who believe it is their right to be dependent, dependents who aggrandize their welfare expectations to the level of desert and honor. Dependents have bankrupted our society, and should be punished by a natural corrective process.



America must have right to war.



A nation cannot survive without the ability to declare war on other nations, and to destroy the government of another nation. The United States government has robbed America of not only the dignity and honor of victory, but the necessity of self-defense. America is wholly incapable of any significant aggression or defense at this time. There are Third World countries anxious to break America’s power, and the opportunity for them to do so increases daily. There appears no victory on the horizon for America’s forces anywhere, not even on our own borders. America is no longer allowed to know what victory is.



America must control citizenship.



The privileges of citizenship are not natural, not inevitable, and not rights. The each must be earned, over time, with due effort. The idea that anyone can simply cross the national border and be a citizen is completely irrational. Only politicians advocate such an idea–for obvious reasons. They see more voters. The social immaturity generated by the American political system must end.



In her last article, Ann Coulter notes that illegal immigration and Obamacare, if not remedied in the next couple of years, will essentially end the America we know (and which most of us have loved). “America will begin its ineluctable descent into becoming a worthless Western European country, with rotten health care, no money for defense and ever-increasing federal taxes to support the nanny state,” Coulter prophecies.



Politicians will certainly not remedy either illegal immigration or Obamacare. It isn’t going to happen. The current is to strong, for too long, in the wrong direction. That’s just the way it is.



Rush Limbaugh used to say, “It’s over!” back when the Clintons were in office. It was. It’s been over, since the Civil War. The federal government became something it was never supposed to be. The overthrow of America, by its own immature people and selfish politicians, was inevitable.



Conservative commentary is just part of the entertainment business. Patriotism is passé. Love of country is a Romantic notion of the 19th century. The country has simply changed, already, into something the fathers would disown. America is a dream of the past. The future will not see her again. Historical circumstance is inimitable, and ignorance has prevailed–ignorance generated by selfish, irreligious hedonists.

In Brief...World News Review India Moving Toward China?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about India and China. This follows this post about items such as Vampire books.  For a free magazine subscription or to get this book for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886-8632.

In Brief...World News Review India Moving Toward China?






article by World News & Trends staff





While the rise of China as an economic power is beginning to be noticed in the West, another rapidly emerging power, India, has been quietly making moves toward a constructive partnership with its old enemy Beijing.



While the rise of China as an economic power is beginning to be noticed in the West, another rapidly emerging power, India, has been quietly making moves toward a constructive partnership with its old enemy Beijing.



Could an alliance between these two "Nuclear Club" nations become a lasting reality? What would be the economic and military results of such an alliance?



What makes this such an astonishing development is that China and India have had a recent history of military conflicts, starting in 1962 and 1967, with numerous skirmishes into the 1990s over ownership of the borderland.



China's armament of Pakistan (which India believes gave Pakistan its nuclear weapons capability) as well as India becoming a military client of the old Soviet Union (a rival of China) were great sources of distrust and fear between the two nations. China had also backed Pakistan during India's wars with Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir territory, while India allowed the Tibetan government-in-exile to exist there, much to China's consternation.



But in 1999 China declared itself neutral in the Kashmir dispute, making an important gesture to India. And since 2003 India has reciprocated by turning over new Tibetan refuge seekers and escapees to the Chinese government.



These and other diplomatic efforts have allowed India and China to become important business partners.



"It is in this context that the interactions between India and China have resulted in increasing mutual trust making India the largest trading partner of China from South Asia since 1993," said Indian political commentator, Dr. Swaran Singh (www.in.rediff.com/news/2002/oct/28chin.htm).



Both India and China supply cheap labor to U.S. companies seeking to outsource their production and customer service. An economic alliance could have powerful effects on the markets. China, in particular, is flooding the United States with inexpensive goods, much to the long-term detriment of the U.S. economy.



Militarily, China has the largest active-duty army in the world. The United States is second, but India is third, and also has the world's seventh-largest navy. An Indian alliance with China would make them the undisputed superpower in Asia!



One reason for this shift in alliances can be attributed to the post-9/11 world and the radical Islamic revolution. Both countries have large Muslim minorities. Another is that China has as its goal to overtake the United States as the world's superpower, and cooperation with India would further that objective.



Bible prophecy warns of a future great army of 200 million (Revelation 9:13-16 [13] And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God,

[14] Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.

[15] And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men.

[16] And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them.





See All...). Could this be the beginning of that enormous military buildup?



Sources: www.Rediff.com  (Mumbai, India); Asia Times Online (Hong Kong).

.