Showing posts with label George Clooney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Clooney. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Snake Bit on Wall Street

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about Wall Street. This follows this post about the Liberty Bell.This follows this post about LGBT homosexuality. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.

MP3 Audio (583.54 KB)
Video of BT Daily: Snake Bit on Wall Street

The Occupy Wall Street movement gets a second life today. But what's it all about?

Transcript


[Darris McNeely] If you’ve been confused about the Occupy Wall Street Movement, so have I and so have a lot of other people. It reminds of being snake bit–seeing all of these protests across the United States and other world capitals against the world economic financial condition.
[Steve Myers] Well, it certainly reminds you of how do we fix our problems? You know, people come up with all kinds of solutions and the latest one is protesting and violence in many cases. So, is that what solves our problems? Is that really where it’s at?
[Darris McNeely] Well, you know, Steve, they drove them out of Zuccotti Park in New York earlier this week and today they’re threatening to come back in by the tens of thousands and maybe getting a second life it seems with this protest movement. And, again, are they…There’s even confusion about the goals that they have and what they actually want to do…some want to bring down the whole economic system, whole system of capitalism.
[Steve Myers] It’s interesting, some of the goals, are they good? Some of the things I’ve heard, yeah. Is man’s system working in some ways? Yeah.
[Darris McNeely] There are problems.
[Steve Myers] But in other ways there are problems.
[Darris McNeely] And we know now this has come three years after the near collapse of Wall Street and the entire American and world financial system that has been tried to be put back on track, yet there has been recessions that have kept it from really operating and coming back with all engines operating. And we’re still in the middle of a mess and that seems to be fueling this. This seems to be a symptom of larger problems.
[Steve Myers] Boy, is it ever. Absolutely.
[Darris McNeely] It reminds me of the story you told in a Beyond Today program recently that we did of the canary in the coal mine that starts to sing when the gases get a little bit too high. This is a symptom of something bigger. That, um, just won’t go away.
[Steve Myers] And where do you look? Are we looking to Wall Street to solve our problems or do you take down Wall Street so we can solve our problems. Or is there a different place that we need to look?
[Darris McNeely] Well, the problem is in leadership. The problem is in some workable solutions. It reminds me of a scripture in the book of Amos, where the prophet Amos talks about conditions at the time of the end. People are told there that they will flee from a lion, and run into a bear. They will run into a house and put their hand against a wall and get bit by a snake (Amos 5:18-20). Everywhere they turn, they don’t find solutions, they find bigger problems.
[Steve Myers] That’s right
[Darris McNeely] And I think that’s where we are right now.
[Steve Myers] Are we solving our own problems? I think that scripture points it out. As long as we keep looking to ourselves we’re going to be snake bit. We’re going to run into a bear. We’re going to run into a lion. So are we looking to God for the solution? Proverbs says that we look to God. He knows how to direct our steps (Proverbs 3:5-8).
[Darris McNeely] That’s BT Daily. Join us next time.

Monday, February 8, 2016

Weekend Box Office: The Choice; Hail, Caesar!

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post about some of the movies from last week and THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch yourself!

Weekend Box Office: The Choice; Hail, Caesar!

By Debbie Schlussel
thechoicehailcaesar
Well, maybe the movies are getting a little better as we inch our way to May blockbusters. The studios held screenings at the same time on the same night for all three new movies debuting in theaters today. And I could only pick one of the others to see at early showings last night (both were at the same time). So, I did not see “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies” (which sounds dumb to me–just saying). I was pleasantly surprised by the pro-life nature of one of this weekend’s new movies.
* “The Choice” – PG-13: This is a pro-life and a pro-religion movie–a refreshing surprise and departure away from the typical Nicholas Sparks movie. (Sparks produced this and it’s based on one of his many best-selling novels.) It’s not one of his usual cloying, manipulative tear-jerker chick flicks, although it starts out to be and is packaged like one. But looks are deceiving.
I don’t want to give too much away, but I feel that one of the trailers I saw for this movie already gives some of it away, so I won’t give away what the trailer doesn’t. The film, as the title indicates, is about a choice–well, actually many choices, each of them important, but one more important than all of them. At first, you believe that the choice is really only about a woman’s choice between two competing suitors who want her to spend their lives with them. And it is that. But that’s the trick. Instead, it is about the bigger choice: whether to keep a loved one alive when he or she is in a coma and all of the medical professionals urge pulling the plug. It’s also about the choice to believe in G-d–to realize that there is a higher power above us all who has a grander plan that supercedes ours. Best laid plans . . . .
Gabby (Teresa Palmer, an Aussie who does a great American accent and resembles a blonde Kristen Stewart) is a medical student who’s moved to a small North Carolina coastal town. Her new next door neighbor is Travis (Benjamin Walker), a veterinarian. When they meet, it’s because she’s angry that he’s playing music loud and claims that his dog has impregnated hers. But, eventually, they hit it off and fall in love, despite her belief in G-d and his lack of belief. She asserts that all of the beautiful nature around them (the cinematography in this is gorgeous) and the other things that are happening in life remind her that there is a greater power and that G-d has such a larger plan that is much bigger than us. Travis, though, doesn’t believe in G-d because his mother died of cancer when he was 14, and he says the only thing you can believe in and rely upon are your friends and family. Still, their relationship grows over a month. And Gabby takes Travis to church, where his widower father is in his glory (he turned to Christianity, the Bible, and faith when he wife was sick and died).
The thing is: Gabby is already in a long-term, serious relationship with a boyfriend, a local, wealthy doctor (Tom Welling, TV’s Superman of “Smallville” fame), who is out of town for a month to open his family’s new medical clinic. When he returns, Gabby is torn between the two men, and the two men fight for her love. That is the first choice made in this movie.
But there is another choice involving life or death. There is a serious accident, and Gabby ends up in a coma. She’s signed a “do not resuscitate” document. So what do to? Is there really a higher power who has plans we don’t know–plans beyond what available science and medicine can do?
That’s the real message of this movie and it provides the answers that I’m sure liberal movie critics will hate, but I loved.
While this movie looks to be formulaic and predictable in its beginning, it throws you for a loop in what it’s really about.
In 2004, another movie threw us for a loop. In my first ever formal movie review column, I wrote about the bait-and-switch pro-euthanasia message that was really the agenda of “Million Dollar Baby,” which was promoted and billed as “Rocky in a Sports Bra.” It wasn’t. My review was quoted by Rush Limbaugh on his nationally-syndicated radio show, as well as the New York Times, USA Today, and a number of other media outlets. Soon after, I began regularly reviewing movies.
But this movie isn’t like that. The movie lets you know in at least one trailer that I saw that it’s about a romance that involves a very serious choice after a very serious accident and shows the female protagonist surrounded by tubes in a hospital bed.
Since this isn’t your typical chick flick and it’s got a great message, it’s a very bearable–and, in fact, enjoyable–romance to which to take your significant other on the upcoming Valentine’s Day weekend, next week. Guys, this is one of the more pleasant ones to sit through.
But it’s not for kids and probably won’t be embraced by religious conservatives, given that premarital sex is involved in a couple of scenes. Still, it’s a classy movie for the most part and tastefully done.
It’s rare that Christianity and the pro-life issue are portrayed so positively in a Hollywood production, and I am proud to add that the movie production involves two of my fellow Jewish co-religionists, director Ross Katz, and producer Peter Safran and his The Safran Company.
Even if you are not into the message, it’s an entertaining movie.
THREE REAGANS
reagancowboyreagancowboyreagancowboy
Watch the trailer . . .

* “Hail, Caesar!” – PG-13: I have mixed feelings about this latest offering from Ethan Coen and Joel Coen a/k/a the Coen Brothers. While it is light and entertaining, there isn’t anything very suspenseful or interesting about it.
And I had a couple of beefs with it. First, there is the belittling and mocking of the Communist threat that was present in Hollywood at the time of this movie (the early 1950s). The threat was very real, and now the threat–a bunch of morally-bankrupt far-lefties who generally hate America–is running Hollywood, which is why America is so depraved. There’s also the mocking of the ’50s’ singing-and dancing musicals as just a bunch o’ gay men. Danny Kaye and Fred Astaire are rolling over in their graves right now.
But I loved the ’50s style and glamor that is ever-present in this movie, despite the presence of two obnoxious lefties (George Clooney and Josh Brolin) in starring roles. The Coens went to great lengths to consult experts on ’50s synchronized swimming and tap-dancing and use these in the movie. It’s very charming and glamorous, and it’s entertaining eye candy.
Brolin is Eddie Mannix, a devout Catholic and head of Capital Pictures, a film studio which is owned by some rich guy back in New York. Mannix is being courted to leave his job and go for a higher-paying, easier, more cushy job at Lockheed, and he’s considering the offer, given all the stress and long hours of what he’s doing at Capital. His job includes a lot of “fixing” of scandals. He must deal with a drunk star actress who is posing for sleazy photos, grooming the image of a cowboy and western actor whom he wants in “higher brow” fare that takes place in the salons of the wealthy, and then there’s the pregnant starlet who is single (and whom he is trying to get married off so the kid won’t be born out of wedlock. In the meantime, his star actor in a Romans-versus-Jesus film has been kidnapped. And, on top of it all, there are feuding twin sister gossip columnists (played by Tilda Swinton in the vein of Hedda Hopper) trolling around for dirt for their newspaper columns. While we are watching this all unfold, we see five different movies being filmed.
There is an old-style Western with gun-slinger Hobie Doyle (Alden Ehrenreich–the Jewish actor who was discovered by Steven Spielberg at a friend’s Bat Mitzvah can even lasso your finger with spaghetti, as he does in the movie). He’s the one being groomed for fancier stuff, and he’s also fixed up with a Carmen Miranda type of actress, whom the studio wants him to date . . . all for his and the studio’s public image. But he can’t get rid of his Southern accent and it makes a mess of snobby English director Laurence Laurentz’s (“Laurence Laurentz Presents!”) fancy movie about the bored and wealthy in a fancy mansion–in which the studio has forced Laurentz (Ralph Fiennes) to cast Doyle as the lead.
Then, there is the tap-dancing musical about sailors about to set sail for months without women. That’s the one in which gay sex is heavily implied. It stars Burt Gurney (Channing Tatum). And there’s “Hail, Caesar!,” which features movie star airhead Baird Whitlock (Clooney). Whitlock is poisoned on the set by two extras (including Sienfeld’s Wayne Knight — Newman!). Then, he’s kidnapped by a group of Communists, called “The Future,” which demands $100,000 in ransom.
And there is also the Esther-Williams-style synchronized swimming movie, starring DeeAnna Moran (Scarlett Johansson). When the cameras stop, she is a boisterous, low-class, pregnant chick with a high-pitched obnoxious, New-York-accented voice. Mannix is repeatedly begging her to allow him to arrange a marriage, so she doesn’t have an illegitimate kid, which would be bad for the studio and its movies (including her movie). How times have changed since that golden era.
And that’s what I mostly liked about this movie. It harkens back to the Golden Age of Hollywood, when morals there and in the rest of America actually counted for something (as did American patriotism) and when bad moral behavior was scandalous and embarrassing. Now it’s applauded and promoted by the studios.
This is supposed to be a comedy and there are some parts that are funny, but it’s not really that funny, and the laughs are far and few between (as well as inconsistent), relative to what you’d expect from the Coen Brothers. The best scene in the movie is that in which a rabbi, a Catholic priest, a Methodist minister and other religious leaders feud over “Hail, Caesar!” when they are called by Mannix to consult on the movie. Very funny scene.
The movie is relaxing and light, but not earth-shattering. It’s also fun and a good escape.
TWO REAGANS
reagancowboyreagancowboy
Watch the trailer . . .

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly
    
 

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Wknd Box Office: Tomorrowland, Poltergeist, Good Kill, 5 Flights Up, Every Secret Thing

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post about some of the movies from last week and THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch yourself!

 

Wknd Box Office: Tomorrowland, Poltergeist, Good Kill, 5 Flights Up, Every Secret Thing

By Debbie Schlussel
tomorrowlandpoltergeist

goodkillfiveflightsup

everysecretthing

Memorial Day Weekend is supposed to be the unofficial start of summer. And yet there is nothing good among the new offerings at the movies, this weekend. All humdrum and mediocre.
* “Tomorrowland“: This movie was a jumbled, multi-culturalist, global warming, George Clooney mess. Thanks, Disney. Walt is turning over in his grave. But, hey, the movie is definitely non-stop pimpitude of Disney rides and features (“It’s a Small World” ride, “Tomorrowland,” etc.). Also, I wondered which genius thought it would be great for kids to feature multiple scenes in which human-looking robots get beheaded.

While the first half of this movie was somewhat charming though mostly nonsensical, it got worse in the second half. The story was absurd and wandering. The movie begins with a little boy at the 1964 World’s Fair. He’s taken his flying jet pack invention to be examined by a “scientist” who is looking for the great discoveries of the future. A little girl gives him a pin that opens up a whole new world, Tomorrowland, when he rides in the “It’s a Small World After All” ride.

Flash forward to present day and a teen girl (very mediocre and unmemorable actress Britt Robertson) is constantly vandalizing the NASA rocket launcher platform because she thinks it will keep her NASA engineer father in a job a little longer, now that human travel to space is now over. The girl, caught in her vandalism, is arrested, as just as she’s being bailed out of jail, she finds one of those Tomorrowland buttons among her possessions. Whenever she touches the button, she’s immediately transported from present day to a futuristic, amazing place with space travel, etc. But the button’s powers run out and she runs away to Texas to try to find another button and find out what the button is, when she is attacked by robots and is rescued by a young English girl. It’s the same girl who gave the boy genius with the jet pack a button decades earlier. It turns out this young girl is really a robot, recruiting geniuses for Tomorrowland and the future, although it’s incredibly hard to believe that the airheaded female vandal is a genius of any sort.

Soon the robot girl takes Britt Robertson to the home of George Clooney, who is the boy genius from the 1964 World’s Fair, all grown up, bitter, and disillusioned. Clooney a/k/a Mr. Amal Alamuddin looks incredibly haggard, tired, and old in this movie, like he really is in real life, and it’s hard to see what the fuss ever was about this self-important narcissist. Clooney and Robertson are forced to escape, after they are chased by robots who want to kill them. The English girl robot joins them as they travel to Tomorrowland and try to save the world from the evil governor of Tomorrowland. The governor shows the earth just weeks from now, flooding from global warming and “greedy humans” who “don’t merit” saving. But Robertson and Clooney, together, save the world by recruiting assorted multi-cultural geniuses, including–the movie screen shows you–Muslims, who are artists. Yes, people drawing chalk pictures on sidewalks while wearing hijabs are gonna save the earth from global warming and destruction. Uh, no.

And did I mention that they took 2.5 hours of our time to show us this big giant nothing? Seemed like five hours.

TWO MARXES
karlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpg

Watch the trailer . . .


* “Poltergeist“: This hews quite close to the original 1982 movie of the same name and of which it is a remake. But I re-watched the original, and it was far better. Either way, neither movie stands the test of time. Neither is scary in the least, and it’s supposed to be a scary movie. And it includes a TV reality show host who “cleans” haunted houses. There is nothing wrong with this movie, except that it’s quite dull. The little girl who is kidnapped by ghosts and demons is the raven-haired doppelganger for the late Heather O’Rourke, who played the same role in the original, and she has the same overdone, saccharin “cuteness.”

It wasn’t as bad as I thought it would be, but it’s not a great movie, either. Nothing earth-shattering here. It’s a lot of the same stuff as the original, with the clown dolls and the TV static. But in this one, there are some modern updates, such as the use of a drone to go into the other dimensions to find the missing daughter and the presence of a TV reality show host who helps fight the demons. I also noted that for such a relatively new house, the attic looks out of place, as it’s a creepy, older-looking room with old accoutrements such as a creepy older sink in the corner. A more modern house like this would never have an attic that looked like that complete with creepy old wooden steps and red velvet carpeting.

The story: a family with parents who’ve been downsized moves to a cheaper house to stay afloat while the mother can write her book and the laid off father looks for work. But the house is haunted by demons and ghosts, and the daughter is taken by them into a netherworld. While the family tries to get her back, they employ a college professor who studies paranormal phenomena and a TV reality show host who “cleans” houses of their ghosts and hauntedness. The family learns the house is built above a cemetery and that’s why the problems are happening.

Like I said, this movie isn’t bad, but it’s unremarkable, not scary, and absolutely forgettable. The only thing that stood out for me was the presence of Sam Rockwell, an actor I always like, as the father character. But this ain’t his best stuff. And, again, as with most remakes, if it ain’t broke, why fix it? The original was fine and far better than this.

HALF A REAGAN
halfreagan

Watch the trailer . . .


* “Good Kill“: I had mixed feelings about this preachy anti-war movie. Normally, I hate anti-war movies like this, and I despise movies that make all of our soldiers look like they are mentally defective when they return home from battle, as this movie does AND as “American Sniper” does (read my review). But this one did try to give both sides on the debate about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, particularly via drone. And there were some good lines. It’s just that the people who made this movie made the guys with the good lines and my point of view into stock Hollywood caricatures of patriotic soldiers and sexist pigs.

The movie takes place in 2010 and Ethan Hawke is a drone pilot based in Las Vegas, bombing terrorists from a secret trailer in the middle of the desert. He was an actual pilot, bombing sites in Afghanistan and Iraq from the air, and he longs to get back to doing that. He feels that directing planes and their weapon loads via computer joystick isn’t really being a pilot, and after several tours, he wants to get back to the real thing. He goes along with orders but has a lot of the same angst as the movies tell us real pilots have, after bombing terrorists and accidentally getting kids in the process.

Hawke has several foils. From the left, there is Zoe Kravitz, a big anti-war liberal who hates that they are bombing people, but won’t kill a rapist who constantly beats a woman. (They can see this from the satellite feed.) She questions everything that they are doing. From the right, there are two patriotic soldiers who support what we are doing and are glad we are directing drones to kill terrorists, rather than risking American troops’ and pilots lives. They have the good, righteous lines in this movie (such as one singing Eddie Money’s, “I’ve Got Two Tickets to Paradise,” just as they are about to bomb a terrorist and his bomb factory; and they refer to liberal, anti-war “Kravitz” as “Jane Fonda.” But I hated that they are portrayed as sexist jerks who brag about sleeping with women who are about to be married to others, and so on. But that’s how Hollywood sees it: if you are right-wing and on the side of the military’s efforts, you are a sexist pig.

I hated that Hawke’s character, as I said, is portrayed as “damaged” and messed up because he directs drones to kill terrorists. And I hated that he gets drunk and cases a mosque. Um, in real life, it’s far more likely the people at the mosque are casing him and the rest of us.

Still, I liked that at least this movie did kind of, sort of try to give a tiny pretense at both sides. The key word is “pretense,” as the guys with the righteous, spot-on, good lines and point of view are one-dimensional jerks.

TWO MARXES
karlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpg

Watch the trailer . . .


* “5 Flights Up“: I hated this long, slow bore and BS statement about “Islamophobia” parading as an interracial love story about old people. Morgan Freeman and Diane Keaton are a long-married couple who are trying to sell their fabulous Brooklyn apartment with a spectacular view and lots of room. Why? Well, it’s five flights up and doesn’t have an elevator. And as they are aging, they worry that at some point they won’t be able to make the trek up the stairs. So, while they are unenthusiastic about giving up this wonderful apartment, they go through the motions of showing it and looking at other apartments for a new place to live.

Interspersed into the movie is its real agenda: to show that Americans are racist pigs who are also anti-Muslim with no legitimate reason. Throughout the movie, we are shown news clips about a Muslim gasoline tanker driver who parks his tanker in the middle of the Brooklyn Bridge, blocking all traffic, and flees the scene. New Yorkers and newscasters are worried the truck may be laced with explosives and it could be a terrorist attack in the making. But, in fact, by the end of the movie, it turns out that everyone is just hysterical for no reason because it’s perfectly normal for an innocent Muslim to drive a tanker full of gas into the middle of the Brooklyn Bridge, block all traffic, and just run away. Happens all the time, right? And they never explain to you why and how this could possibly have an innocent explanation. They just tell you he was an innocent guy and that we are all bigots. Also, a number of people, including a waitress or bartender who stole all the money from her job, go on TV to lie about and frame the innocent Muslim for crimes they committed themselves. Yup, we evil White people–always framing the innocent Muslims.

Oh, and it seems the movie is also trying to make a point that Islamophobia is the new racism, as the movie flashes back to the racism people directed toward Freeman’s and Keaton’s characters as they were a young married interracial couple, decades earlier. That’s interesting because Islam is actually the most racist religion there is, with Blacks regularly referred to as “abed/abeed” [slave/slaves], the Arabic/Muslim N-word. And there’s nothing “racist” or “bigoted” about worrying when a devout Muslim parks a tanker across a bridge, blocks traffic, and runs away. Um, no, that’s not normal, and it’s incredibly normal to conclude the driver is up to no good.

But, thanks, Morgan Freeman and Diane Keaton, for this preachy lesson in liberal moronism. And thanks for making me wade through this stilted slog to get there.

FOUR MARXES PLUS FOUR OBAMAS PLUS THREE ISIS BEHEADINGS
karlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgplus.jpgobamasmilingsmallerobamasmilingsmallerobamasmilingsmallerobamasmilingsmallerplus.jpgisisbeheadingisisbeheadingisisbeheading

Watch the trailer . . .


* “
Every Secret Thing“: I’m not sure what the point of this movie is, other than to bore me to tears and question why I just wasted 1.5 hours of my life that seemed like three hours. This has been billed as a “twisty thriller” but there’s nothing twisty, mysterious, or thrilling about it. Not even close. After I sat through this, I wondered, “is that all there is?” And, sadly, the answer is in the affirmative. Not much here, other than a slow waste of time. Oh, and a hardly believable story of white chicks apparently obsessed with biracial babies.

The story: two White young girls are accused of kidnapping and killing a biracial baby. After being convicted, they are sent to juvenile prison for the murder. After they reach adulthood, they are released from prison and struggle to live their lives. One of the girls (Dakota Fanning) is from a poor, working class family, and she is working at a bakery. The other (Danielle Macdonald) is a morbidly obese daughter of an educated upper middle class teacher (Diane Lane). She is unemployed and doesn’t seem to live in reality. But, now, another biracial baby has gone missing, and soon both girls are under suspicion again. The police officer (Elizabeth Banks), who became a star detective after breaking the original case and finding the baby’s body, is on the case again.

Not only are there no mysterious twists or any great revelations, but the movie comes to a grinding halt with a very matter-of-fact ending and resolution of it all. Nothing exciting here. But lots to cure what ails you on a night you’ve been afflicted with insomnia.

FOUR MARXES PLUS FOUR ISIS BEHEADINGS
karlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgplus.jpgisisbeheadingisisbeheadingisisbeheadingisisbeheadingplus.jpg

Watch the trailer . . .