Showing posts with label Crimson Peak. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Does the Bible Speak of Hellfire That Lasts Forever?

An interesting article from http://www.ucg.org/ about hell. This follows this post about transgenders. This follows this post about the Devil. For a free magazine subscription or to get the books recommended for free click HERE! or call 1-888-886- 8632.
Please follow me here for continued posts.

Does the Bible Speak of Hellfire That Lasts Forever?

http://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets

by United Church of God Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

Add to my study list

First, notice the setting to which they refer—when Jesus “comes in His glory” (Matthew 25:31-32). We are told that He separates the sheep from the goats. The sheep represent the righteous (Matthew 25:34-40). At His return He sets the sheep at His right hand. The goats in this instance represent sinners. They are appointed to assemble on Jesus’ left hand. He then consigns the goats to “the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels” (Matthew 25:41).
The word everlasting is translated from the Greek word aionios. The key to understanding this verse is knowing what will occur everlastingly. Does it refer to a fire that tortures without end, or does it have another meaning?
In Matthew 25:46 Jesus spoke in a single sentence of everlasting ( aionios ) punishment and of life eternal ( aionios ). Since the righteous will be given eternal, or everlasting, life, many theologians believe the punishing of the wicked must last as long as the life given to the righteous. But this cannot be reconciled with the statement that those cast into the lake of fire perish— they are killed. As explained elsewhere, they suffer death—the second death (Revelation 2:11; Revelation 20:6, Revelation 14:1-20 1 And I looked, and, see, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father’s name written in their foreheads. 2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: 3 And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth. 4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb wherever he goes. These were redeemed from among men, being the first fruits to God and to the Lamb. 5 And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God. 6 And I saw another angel fly in the middle of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people, 7 Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters. 8 And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication. 9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, 10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: 11 And the smoke of their torment ascends up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name. 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. 13 And I heard a voice from heaven saying to me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from now on: Yes, said the Spirit, that they may rest from their labors; and their works do follow them. 14 And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and on the cloud one sat like to the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle. 15 And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud, Thrust in your sickle, and reap: for the time is come for you to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe. 16 And he that sat on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth; and the earth was reaped. 17 And another angel came out of the temple which is in heaven, he also having a sharp sickle. 18 And another angel came out from the altar, which had power over fire; and cried with a loud cry to him that had the sharp sickle, saying, Thrust in your sharp sickle, and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth; for her grapes are fully ripe. 19 And the angel thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great wine press of the wrath of God. 20 And the wine press was trodden without the city, and blood came out of the wine press, even to the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.
American King James Version; Revelation 21:8).
A plain and simple meaning of Matthew 25:46 that fits with the rest of the Bible is that the wicked are cast into a fire that annihilates them—renders them forever extinct. The resulting punishment of being cast into the aionios fire is a one-time event. It is a permanent punishment , the results of which will remain forever—that is, eternal death. It is not ongoing punishing that continues forever without end. This is the only explanation that agrees with the rest of the Scriptures.
An additional point needs to be made regarding the meaning of aionios. Genesis 19 describes God’s destruction of two cities, Sodom and Gomorrah, for their wickedness: “Then the LORD rained brimstone and fire on Sodom and Gomorrah” (Genesis 19:24). They were utterly destroyed—consumed by fire.
In the New Testament, the book of Jude describes these cities as “suffering the vengeance of eternal [ aionios ] fire” (Jude 1:7). Yet it is obvious that the fires that destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah are not still burning. In the case of these cities and in the case of the wicked, who are consigned to aionios fire, the fire burns and completely destroys. But the eternal aspect of the fire is its everlasting effect, not how long it actually burns.

Monday, October 19, 2015

Wknd Box Office: Bridge of Spies, Steve Jobs, Goosebumps, Crimson Peak

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post about some of the movies from last week and THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch yourself!

Wknd Box Office: Bridge of Spies, Steve Jobs, Goosebumps, Crimson Peak

By Debbie Schlussel

Of the new movies debuting in theaters today, the best of the bunch is a scary movie aimed at kids.
* “Bridge of Spies“: I didn’t like this movie for several reasons, primary among them the belittling of the dangerous conduct of a Soviet spy, the softening of Soviet human rights abuses, and the blatant moral equivalency of the U.S. and the Soviets portrayed in this film from the first frame. The movie begins with an onscreen statement of moral equivalency between the United States and the Soviet Union. And we were never equal. The statement says that during the height of the Cold War, the United States was afraid of the Soviet Union, and the Soviet Union was afraid of the U.S. It goes on to say that each country was fearful that the other was going to acquire and use nuclear weapons. You see, in the world of Steven Spielberg (who directed and made this movie happen), the Soviets were “just like us.” I guess he forgot that his own grandparents left Russia, where they were confronted by intense anti-Semitism.
The movie makes little to no mention of the legion Soviet human rights abuses, but for one scene showing the shooting of East Germans trying to climb over the wall separating them from West Germany and a later scene showing American kids easily climbing over walls with nothing happening to them. That is the extent of the “moral high ground” of America versus the Soviets as expressed in this movie.
As I’ve noted in the past, including in my late father’s eulogy, my late father, H.L. Schlussel, MD, an ophthalmologist was connected with a family of colleagues in the Soviet Union in the late ’70s, the Poltinnikovs. Dr. Isaac Poltinnokov and his wife and daughter, all three of them ophthalmologists, were fired from their jobs, after they applied for visas to go to Israel. Thereafter, they were forbidden by the Soviet State to have jobs, and they had no money for food, housing, and heat, in the bitter, bleak cold of Siberia. They were also not allowed to accept money from donors–this was outlawed as “parasitism” by the Soviet State–so they were unable to pay for these things. My late father, Of Blessed Memory, created fake medical situations of the eye, wrote them down, sent them to Dr. Poltinnikov, and paid him for his “consultations” on these fake cases. Dr. Poltinnikov finally got to go to Israel, but alone. His wife and daughter died–one of them committing suicide after non-stop KGB harassment of them, and the other dying of starvation out of fear the KGB was poisoning their food. Nothing like this or any other Soviet horrors was shown in this movie. Not even close. Again, they are “just like us,” in the world according to Spielberg.
Also missing from this movie is any mention whatsoever of Soviet spy Rudolf Invanovich Abel’s involvement in the enemy spy ring passing U.S. atomic secrets to the Soviets. Yes, he was tied to the operation that involved the Rosenbergs, who were executed for treason, as Rudolf Abel should have been. But none of Abel’s activities here are mentioned in the movie. In fact, his trial is quickly skipped over, as well as his appeal. What we are primarily shown is the trumped up “heroics” of James B. Donovan, a liberal Democrat insurance lawyer (Tom Hanks), who once assisted in prosecutions of Nazis at the Nuremberg Trials and is pressed into service to represent Abel in his federal trial. Donovan loses the trial but successfully gets the judge to sentence Abel to life in prison instead of death. Then, Donovan decides to pursue an appeal to the Supreme Court on Abel’s behalf and loses, but not before his law firm, the police, and average American citizens are attacking him and his house and telling him he’s the most hated man in America. Many of the actions in the movie are meant to invoke current images of Islamic terrorists and their lawyers (Spielberg said so in interviews), with us evil, unsophisticated, bigoted Americans in the wrong for opposing Islamic terrorists and their lawyers’ tactics in court. By the way, Abel is the nicest, most fabulous guy in this movie. Because, hey, all Soviet spies stealing our nuclear technology were the most classy of people, right?
This movie is long, slow, and boring at nearly 2.5 hours. When it finally starts moving, the movie is already halfway through, and that’s when we get to Donovan’s secret trip to East Germany to negotiate a trade of Abel in exchange for Francis Gary Powers, an American pilot who was shot down over Russia. Donovan also wants the release of an American grad student who was studying economics in East Germany and was captured by the East Germans. But the CIA position is that the trade is one for one because the agency doesn’t want to jeopardize the pilot’s freedom for a student who knowingly and willingly did the idiotic thing to go and study among the Soviet-backed East German Communists. That’s a position I agree with, but, of course, those of us who don’t want to rescue Americans that do dumb things and visit enemy countries (and then get captured) are “extremist,” “intolerant,” and “unAmerican.” And that’s how the CIA is portrayed here. Oh, and by the way, typical of Hollywood, all the drama of the negotiations for the prisoner exchange are trumped up from what really happened–you know, in order to make the movie “exciting.”
While the movie makes Donovan out to be some sort of great hero, it doesn’t tell you that he had the chance to kill Fidel Castro by giving him a poison-laden diving suit, but declined and foiled the operation by giving his own suit to the human rights abusing dictator. The movie does mention in a post-script that Donovan was enlisted by the CIA and the federal government to negotiate on behalf of the Bay of Pigs families.
Yes, the movie is beautifully shot and chock full of dramatic orchestral music–and, yes, it recognizes a largely unsung man in contemporary U.S. history. But it’s a slog. I struggled to stay awake in the slow first half (and briefly lost the battle, missing nothing). And I can’t recommend a movie that, for the most part, makes us out to be morally equivalent to the brutal, totalitarian Soviet dictatorship . . . and makes their spies out to be swell guys.
Sorry.
TWO MARXES PLUS TWO OBAMAS

Watch the trailer . . .

* “Steve Jobs“: The other day, while waiting for an associate at Chase Bank to help me, I had nothing to read but the thick volume on the bank’s history. It was so dry, uninteresting, and snooze-inducing that I quickly closed the book and stopped that pointless exercise. Unfortunately, sitting through this movie, I felt like I was kidnapped and held hostage by the corporate biography of Chase again, but the word, “Apple,” and the name, “Steve Jobs,” were inserted instead. I don’t know how they managed to make the life of an exciting and inspirational corporate genius and idea man like Jobs into a snoozer, but they did. What was just over two hours seemed like more than three. The movie is too much “inside baseball” stuff, concentrating on corporate minutiae nobody really cares about. Do you really care about who voted for what at which board meeting and then had to leave the fancy lounge at the airport to save his job? Yaaawn.
The filmmakers bought the rights to the Walter Isaacson-penned book on Jobs, and it’s hard to believe that out of that vastly interesting read, the filmmakers focused only on what a jerk Jobs was to his employees and his illegit daughter and babymama. Yes, I know he initially denied paternity and didn’t handle it in the most fatherly and responsible way, but did I need to be hammered over the head with “Steve Jobs is a jerky sperm donor!” two-by-four for nearly the entire movie? There was much more to this guy, and all we saw was that he was an awful person, a bad father, and a whiny b-tch. It was very one-sided. And it takes place only on three separate days of Jobs’ career in computers. That’s it. Just three days. It doesn’t give a picture of anything. But, when Jobs died, there was too much adulation–it was way over the top–and now the pendulum is swinging back in the other direction.
Making things even worse was the casting of Jobs. Irish/German actor Michael Fassbender’s accent constantly reared its head, while Jobs was born here and had a markedly American accent. On top of that, Fassbender looks nothing like Jobs until the last third of the movie, which takes place in Jobs’ black mock turtleneck era. So, it just wasn’t believable. And the filmmakers, as well as Jobs’ former friend and partner, Steve Wozniak, admit that they made up much of the dialogue and scenes in the movie.
I never thought I’d say this, but the hokey Ashton Kutcher Steve Jobs movie (read my review) was far, far better and looks like a masterpiece compared to this. This had no plot and just slogged along. The dialogue was way too overwrought, and the movie just wasn’t interesting.
The only person I thought stood out in this movie was Kate Winslet as Joanna Hoffman, who, according to this movie, was Jobs “right-hand man” throughout his corporate career. I thought she did a good job with the Polish immigrant accent. And that’s the best I can say for this bore.
Don’t believe the hype. This movie doesn’t live up to even a tiny fraction of it.
ONE MARX

Watch the trailer . . .

* “Goosebumps“: I really enjoyed this movie, and it’s the relative best of the new offerings at theaters, today. But I was surprised that this was aimed at kids, since it’s kind of scary (although the real-life author portrayed in the movie does write semi-scary kids books). I know, I know–kids aren’t allowed to have a childhood anymore. But, for example, in one scene in this movie, a bunch of garden gnomes are trying to drag author R.L. Stine into a burning oven to kill him. It’s fine for teens, though. The movie is very funny, fast-paced, and, for the most part, tightly written. It’s also, as I mentioned, somewhat scary.
The story: Jack Black plays real life author R. L. Stine, one of the most successful authors of kids books (and books of any kind for that matter). In real life, he reportedly makes over $40 million per year and has sold several hundred million books, including the “Goosebumps” series depicted in the movie.
The story: Zach (Dylan Minnette), whose father has died, moves with his high school principal mother to the small town of Madison, Delaware, where his mother now heads the high school. Zach discovers Hannah (Odeya Rush, who resembles a younger Mila Kunis), a cute girl living next door . . . and her mysterious, weirdo father (Black). The dad forbids Hannah from having anything to do with Zach. But kids will be kids, and the two ignore her father’s advice and become fast friends. One night, Zach thinks he hears the father attacking Hannah, and he calls the police. Then, he sneaks into Hannah’s house and opens some locked manuscripts of Goosebumps books, releasing the monsters in the stories onto the earth and causing havoc. One of those monsters is a ventriloquist dummy villain, who opens all of the rest of the books, releasing all of the monsters, causing a major disaster, as the monsters will destroy the town and probably the world. Zach learns that the father is really author R.L. Stine, and together, they try to save the town.
There are some really funny lines (especially the R.L. Stine/Steven King “feud” stuff), and it’s a cute movie. Not a masterpiece, and the way it was “all tied up” at the end was too convenient. But, overall, it’s a nice escapist movie for the younger set, which I also enjoyed.
I saw this in 2D, and it was just fine. So you don’t need to spring for the 3D version.
TWO REAGANS
reagancowboy

Watch the trailer . . .

* “Crimson Peak“: I hated this movie. Another long, slow, boring trudge through ground that has been broken, rehashed, and re-vomited a million times, including the dumb, vile brother-sister incest thing. Um, old news. I feel like I’ve seen this plot over and over again. And the “scary” monsters–CGI black skeletons–weren’t scary at all. They were amateurish CGI and just laughable. On top of that, it’s just a dreadful, bleak waste of time.
The story: it’s the late 1800s, and a mysterious Englishman, Sir Thomas Sharpe (Tom Hiddleston), is in America, trying to get money from rich people to invest in his clay-digging machine. While in the process of seeking investors, Thomas romances Edith (Mia Wasikowska), the young daughter of a wealthy widower whose investment he is seeking. Then, he announces his quick engagement to her. The father sees Thomas and his raven-haired sister, Lucille (Jessica Chastain), as con artists, and he pays them off to break his daughter’s heart and leave town. But they kill the father, and soon Edith is married to the man. Then, she moves to England to the brother’s and sister’s creepy rural castle. The castle is a dump with rot everywhere, blood red soil leaking out of the floorboards, and a giant hole in the ceiling in the dead of winter. But love is blind, and Edith looks the other way, embracing the dumpy castle, despite its filth, very evident creepiness, and other unlivable maladies.
Meanwhile, it turns out that the siblings are not only just as bad as Edith’s father believed they were, they are worse. A doctor (Charlie Hunnam), from Edith’s hometown in America, loves her and researches just who Edith’s new “relations” are, along with the help of a suspicious family attorney.
In the meantime, Edith lives and wanders the creepy castle and, despite encountering many guests, having a lot of bad dreams, and discovering pools of blood read sludge in giant vats in the basement, it takes her a while to suspect that something is very wrong. Yes, you could have seen this coming, along with everything else in this movie. It’s very predictable, derivative, repetitive, slow-moving, and just poorly done. It’s a mess.
Since it’s a period piece, a lot of attention to superficial detail has been paid. The costumes are beautiful, and the bleak, deserted environment is stark. You feel all of it and more. It’s just that the story doesn’t deserve it. It’s just that bad. And that seems to be the case in a lot of movies these days: gorgeous sets, costumes, and cinematography, but the plot: quite ugly.
And like many of these movies, this one is all style, with zero substance of note.
Skip this.
THREE MARXES PLUS AN ISIS BEHEADING

Watch the trailer . . .

brianlee

Tuesday, October 20, 2015