Showing posts with label Chris Pratt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Pratt. Show all posts

Monday, September 26, 2016

Wknd Box Office: The Magnificent Seven, Queen of Katwe, Storks, The Hollars

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post about some of the movies from last week and THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch yourself!


Wknd Box Office: The Magnificent Seven, Queen of Katwe, Storks, The Hollars

By Debbie Schlussel
magnificentsevenqueenofkatwe

storksthehollars
Unfortunately, the best new movie in theaters today is very politically correct and racist (it kills off ALL of the White heroes). Even more unfortunate, there are themes of political correctness, anti-White racism, and/or Black supremacism running through virtually every new movie.

* The Magnificent Seven – Rated PG-13: The first thing you need to know about this very politically correct movie is that ALL three of the White Magnificent Seven members are killed off by the end of this movie. Only the minorities survive. Oh, and also, the movie’s villain is also White (as is his large band of mercenary thugs–where’s da diversity?), and he’s an evil businessman/real estate developer. Always gotta insert that gratuitous, hypocritical Hollywood faux-hate of capitalism in the plot line. Plus, this movie is incredibly violent and bloody–much more than I expected, especially for a PG-13 flick. Still, despite all of that, I mostly liked the movie. That’s also despite its running time of two hours and 12 minutes.
But would it have killed them to write a movie in which at least ONE of the White Magnificent Seven lives??? This movie gets the Colin Kaepernick Black Racist Seal of Approval.
There have been several remakes of what was originally Japanese director Akira Kurosawa’s truly magnificent “The Seven Samurai,” including a 1998 CBS TV series co-starring my high school friend Rick Worthy. But most Americans remember the best “remake” to be the original English language version, the 1960 “The Magnificent Seven” movie, in which a Mexican village requests the help of the White Magnificent Seven.
In this movie, a White town requests the help of a mostly minority Magnificent Seven–led by a Black guy (Denzel Washington) and also comprised of an American Indian, er . . . “Native American,” a Mexican, a Chinese dude, and three White guys (Chris Pratt, Ethan Hawke, and Vincent D’Onofrio. It’s unlikely that really would have happened in the 1800s Old West, the setting for this “update.”
Also, in this movie, there isn’t always stark good-versus-evil, at least at the beginning. Chris Pratt kills one or two gamblers who rip him off, and he shoots a guy’s ear off. (Of course, it’s a White member of the Magnificent Seven who does these things.) Though, this is before he joins the “Seven.”
The story: an evil White real estate developer from Sacramento (played by ultra-left-wing America-hater Peter Sarsgaard) terrorizes the people of a small town and murders some of them in cold blood–all because he wants their land at a cheap price. The wife of one of the men who is killed hires Denzel Washington and his band of six other men to come to town and fight off the real estate developer and his band of mostly White thugs (there is one exception–he has an American Indian thug, Denali, but other than that–the rest of his bad guys, which number in the hundreds, are all White).
The Magnificent Seven come to town and train the townspeople to shoot and fight. And then they help the people fight off the bad guys. But their battle is bloody, and they’ve been forewarned that many people will die.
As I watched the battle and saw the three White Magnificent Seven (plus the Chinese one) get killed, I thought, “Wow, there isn’t a lot of room for the sequel here.” But, then, I realized that White people are disposable, and they can be recast. My mind was also screaming . . .
White Magnificent Seven Lives Matter!
Just not in this racist, politically-correct movie.
Still, I love a good western, and this movie wasn’t bad as far as that goes–despite all the racist, PC baloney.
So I give it . . .
TWO REAGANS PLUS TWO COLIN KAEPERNICK RACIST SEALS OF APPROVAL
reagancowboyreagancowboyplus.jpgcolinkapernickkneecolinkapernickknee
Watch the trailer . . .

* Queen of Katwe – Rated PG: Hmmm . . . since nearly half of the greatest chess players of all time were/are Jews, when I think of chess champions I think of Uganda. Don’t you? Of course, that’s the absurd conceit (and deceit) of this movie, even though the movie is ultimately uplifting after moving very slowly for the first half. Also, FYI, when I think of Uganda, I think of their late Muslim leader, Idi Amin, and the Muslim hostage-taking of Jews who were held and terrorized in Entebbe, NOT chess.
Also, I was horrified that a Disney movie aimed at and heavily marketed to kids–especially Black kids–repeatedly features a child prostitute who gets pregnant. And it doesn’t exactly look down on her and her exploits much. Walt Disney is turning over in his grave.
The movie goes out of its way to downplay, minimize, and whitewash the role of Christianity in the story. And, since mostly Americans and Brits play the main characters, they go out of their way to overdo their “Ugandan” accents, making it hard to understand them and what they are saying for most of the first half of the movie. The first half of the movie is also slow and boring, and the movie doesn’t really heat up and get interesting until half way through, when the chess competitions get going.
“Based on a real-life story,” this is about a Ugandan girl, Phiona Mutesi, who becomes Uganda’s first chess master, and ultimately plays and beats chess champions all over Uganda and internationally. She and the other kids in the movie live in an extremely poor ghetto of Katwe in Uganda. They are destitute. A local community organizer (really a man working for a local Christian church ministry) is a chess player and coach. He reaches out and teaches them chess. Ultimately they beat the stock Hollywood-cast snobby rich kids. But the star is Phiona. She is so good that she beats the top Ugandans and goes to international competitions. Her dream is to become a chess “master.”
Phiona’s father died, and her mother (Lupita Nyong’o) is a single mother because of that. She’s struggling to survive, and so she is skeptical of Phiona’s chess aspirations. Phiona’s sister is a teen prostitute who takes money for sex, dresses like a whore, and eventually becomes pregnant by one of the men. I was disappointed that this darkness (and other darkness–Phiona’s home, an old church, is completely flooded like a river and they lose everything) was in a Disney kids’ movie. It wasn’t necessary.
The coach, played by David Oyelowo, is actually a Christian minister, but you’d be hard-pressed to know that because–as I’ve noted–Disney mostly washed that out of this ultimately inspiring and uplifting story. The only hint of it is that in one scene you can see the van he drove has a barely-visible cross and the name “ministry” on it.
The kids in the movie are very cute and funny. And eventually the story is uplifting and inspires ambition. I liked that message of empowering one’s self and taking personal responsibility to get out of poverty. But, let’s be real: Uganda ain’t known for its chess champions, despite what the movie wants you to think.
HALF A REAGAN PLUS TWO MICHELLE LAVAUGHN ROBINSON HUSSEIN OBAMA IDI AMIN DADAS PLUS TWO COLIN KAEPERNICK RACIST SEALS OF APPROVAL
halfreaganplus.jpgmichelleobamaangrysmallermichelleobamaangrysmallerplus.jpgcolinkapernickkneecolinkapernickknee
Watch the trailer . . .

* Storks – Rated PG: This dumb, cockamamie “kids” movie was soooooo incredibly annoying. And the very stupid story looked like it was slapped together by a two-year-old (with apologies to two-year-olds for the comparison with the writers of this crappy waste of time). In an era–and in a year–when there are so many far-superior animated kids’ movies, this falls stunningly flat. It also highlights the lack of good, original story-telling that apparently befuddles so many in Hollywood. I was surprised at the silliness of this movie. Plus it is very slow and very boring. The animation is fine, but nothing outstanding. Just the basics that we’ve already come to expect, given today’s technology. Pixar this ain’t. Not even close.
The “story” (if you can call it that): storks used to deliver babies to new parents. But it was too hard, and they had so many near-accidents. So, now, they are out of that business and into something else. Today, the storks are delivery men for a giant Amazon.com-like company, called “CornerStore.com.” The main character stork in the movie is about to be promoted to “boss” by the CEO stork. But, first, he has to attend to the orphan girl who lives in the company’s facility in the sky. She’s left over from the days of when the storks used to deliver newborns. Unfortunately, the girl and the stork accidentally set off the old factory machinery from those days, and a new baby is delivered.
The rest of the movie basically follows the stork and the orphan girl trying to brave the elements and other obstacles in order to deliver the baby to its family. (The cutest–and only interesting–scene is when the two are trying to escape a very smart and resourceful pack of wolves.) Meanwhile, the orphan girl longs to find her own family and be united with them, after all these years. And, at the same time, a “Valley Guy-esque” stool pigeon is telling on them to the CEO because the pigeon wants to be boss instead of the stork. While all of this is going on, a young boy wants a baby brother because his real estate agent parents are neglectful and devoted to their jobs instead of him. So, he begins building a giant amusement-park on the family home’s roof, in order to attract a delivery stork.
At the end of the movie, the storks accidentally set off the baby factory, and thousands of kids pop out. So the storks have to deliver them to their families. This is exactly when I thought to myself, “here’s where the political correctness starts and we see gay families and so on getting deliveries.” Sure enough, Hollywood never disappoints the PC crowd. You see all-female and all-male couples getting baby deliveries. Soooo predictable.
The first ex-Mrs. Brad Pitt (Jennifer Aniston) and Andy Samberg voice characters in this movie. I’m not a fan of either.
Believe me, I’m making this dumb story sound far better than it is. This is a snoozer, and pointless. But kids will probably love the colors.
ONE-AND-A-HALF MARXES
karlmarxmovies.jpg
Watch the trailer . . .

* The Hollars – Rated PG-13: Oy vey. Directed by and starring John Krasinski, this movie is HORRIBLE! Absolutely awful. High quality Gitmo torture material and 1.5 hours of my life I’ll never get back. Who on earth would pay ten-bucks-plus to see this? Only a sucker or a dupe. They’d have to pay me a lot to see this again. Yuck. And it’s incredibly depressing.
Make no mistake: this movie is a deliberate and loud attack on middle American life by snobby Hollywood elitist creeps. (And it’s also, sub rosa, an attack on the lives of average White Americans, too.)
The story: Krasinski plays a guy living in New York trying to “live the dream.” But it turns out he’s not exactly living the dream and isn’t happy with his life. That comes out after he returns home to the small town from which he came to see his family. He learns that his mother has had a seizure because of a brain tumor and she must get immediate surgery to remove it. He also learns that his father’s business is about to go bankrupt and has been losing money, that the family is completely broke, and that his divorced-dad brother is living in his parents basement and lost his job in the family business. The father is a dopey, infantilized, incompetent fool. On top of that, they don’t know how they’re going to pay for their mother’s surgery. And they worry that she won’t survive the operation. But, other than that, GUH-REAT! movie.
Oh, wait. I forgot that Krasinski’s girlfriend (Anna Kendrick) is pregnant, but he really doesn’t think he wants to be a father or to marry the girlfriend. His career is basically non-existent, though, and he’s being “floated” by her financially, as she is very rich. Still, he realizes his life ain’t so bad compared to that of his family in “red state” G-d’s country. Virtually everyone in the small town is a “lesser than” and either a jerk or backward or something.
Shame on Josh Groban for co-starring in this garbage. Also, I’m not sure how this avoided an R-rating. Standards have clearly disintegrated.
I couldn’t stand this movie from the beginning, and each time when I thought it couldn’t get any worse or more boring and depressing, it got worse, more boring, and even more depressing. This is absolute crap. And that’s an understatement. I hated the veiled, sneering, arrogant, and smug politics of this. And I just hated this in every other way, too. Who needs this? Not me. And definitely not you. This movie is so bad that it won awards at all the major movie festivals. That’s how it works. Crap rises to the top.
Pointless trash. Avoid like the plague.
FOUR MARXES PLUS A COLIN KAEPERNICK RACIST SEAL OF APPROVAL
karlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgplus.jpgcolinkapernickknee
Watch the trailer . . .

You might also like:


Monday, June 15, 2015

Wknd Box Office: Jurassic World, Farewell Party, Madame Bovary, 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared

Here is an interesting article from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/ reviewing some of the movies that came out over the past weekend. This follows this post about some of the movies from last week and THIS POST about some movies that have been released over the past few years that you might have missed! This all follows this post about guidelines to choosing good movies to watch yourself!

Wknd Box Office: Jurassic World, Farewell Party, Madame Bovary, 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared


By Debbie Schlussel
jurassicworldfarewellparty

madamebovaryhundredyearoldmanmovie









Though my reviews are late in being posted as I wasn’t able to finish them before the Jewish Sabbath began, you aren’t missing much. The relative highlight–with “relative” being very much the key word here–is the remake/reboot “Jurassic World,” but even that is just okay. Not bad, but not great.
* “Jurassic World“: Um, didn’t they learn after the first–or the first THREE?!–Jurassic movies that humans plus dinosaurs equals danger? That’s why this more than kinda sorta seems like the same old thing . . . again. And I say this as someone who has never seen any of the first three Jurassic movies from beginning to end (though I’ve seen large swaths of the first one and parts of the second).
They’re calling this both a remake and a reboot of the original 1994 “Jurassic Park” movie. And both are true because it’s basically a repeat of the original with new tweaks and technology. Plus, there are references and tributes to the original. But you needn’t have seen any of the previous Jurassic movies to know what’s going on. This one stands alone. The movie seems to be Chris Pratt’s audition tape to be the new Indiana Jones, a role he’s rumored to soon play. He’s definitely wearing Indiana Jones’ clothes and doing his swashbuckling in this flick.
And despite all of my talk above–and the plain fact that there’s nothing new here–it’s not a bad movie. Fans of the originals will like it, and newcomers probably will, too. It’s very suspenseful and fast-paced. There’s lots of action, and it doesn’t disappoint. But it also has a not-so-veiled anti-business storyline, not to mention the fact that one of the villains of the movie is a Blackwater military type of guy (Vincent D’Onofrio) who wants to use the dinosaurs as weapons and soldiers in the Middle East. Imagine that–wanting to save American soldiers’ lives and limbs. Yup, datz evil!
The story: Jurassic World is a new Disneyland-stylie resort/attraction on the same island where Jurassic Park was set. The resort is owned by arrogant billionaire businessman Simon Masrani (Indian Muslim actor Irrfan Khan). Masrani paid scientists working on the island to develop new dinosaurs through gene/DNA splicing because if the resort doesn’t create new dinosaurs every few years, the public gets bored and won’t come to the resort. They’ve developed a secret, giant mutant dinosaur, which is being kept in a special cage on the restricted part of the island.
The resort is managed by Bryce Dallas Howard (whose acting career has nothing whatsoever to do with being the daughter of Ron Howard, right?). She is a workaholic, prissy, stick in the mud, who went on one date with Chris Pratt, a dinosaur-whisperer, who has his own independent dinosaur training camp, where he trains velociraptors. The date didn’t work out because he’s very masculine and she had the date all planned out in writing (or something like that). Howard convinces Pratt to come the resort to help with something regarding the mutant dinosaur.
Howard’s nephews have come to visit the resort, but she’s so busy working, she neglects them, leaving them with her assistant. They ditch the assistant and sneak off to the rides and attractions in the middle of the dinosaur park on the island. But, soon, the mutant dinosaur, who is very smart, tricks people from the resort, and escapes. It is on a rampage, and is killing other dinosaurs and a lot of people.
Pratt warns billionaire Masrani that he must used lethal weapons, such as RPGs, to kill the mutant dinosaur and that he must also evacuate all humans from the island. But Masrani refuses, saying it will hurt his costly investment ($26 million) in the mutant dinosaur and give Jurassic World such bad PR that it will be forced to go out of business.
Pratt eventually goes with Howard into the middle of the island jungle to rescue her two nephews, who are stranded near the mutant dinosaur and in danger. And the rest of the movie follows the rescue attempts, as well as the pair’s attempts to save the rest of the surviving guests and kill the mutant dinosaur.
Some who’ve seen the movie object to the use of a lot of computer generated images (CGI) in the movie. But the CGI isn’t bad or that noticeable. Plus, try finding some real-life AND harmless dinosaurs for use in the movies. I saw this in 3D and the 3D effects are not bad, but you’ll be fine not paying the extra bucks and seeing it in regular 2D.
Many conservatives believe actor Pratt is also a conservative because he owns guns, hunts and fishes, hails from a small town and values small town life, and posted a video teaching his two-year-old son the pledge of allegiance. All of those things are laudable. But you have to question any “conservative”–any American–who willingly stars in an anti-business, anti-American military movie. This one is both. And for that reason, while I’d normally give this TWO REAGANS, it is lowered to . . .
ONE-AND-A-HALF REAGANS
reagancowboyhalfreagan
Watch the trailer . . .

* “The Farewell Party [Mita Tova]“: I’ve often warned you on this site that Israel’s filmmakers are just as far-left as–and actually far worse than–Hollywood filmmakers. And this is yet another case in point. The original Hebrew title of this movie is “Mita Tova,” which means “good death” or “a good death.” Yup this is the “feel-good, musical euthanasia movie of the year,” complete with at least two scenes of sagging, naked senior citizens’ bodies. Those were “I just threw up in my mouth” moments I can’t seem to erase from my mind but really wish I could. TMI [Too Much Information], Israeli Hollywoodites. TMI! Ditto for the many, many scenes of two senior citizen gay men having an affair, kissing, and lying in bed, etc. They are among those we are forced to see naked. File Under: Um, NO THANKS!
The story: a small group of senior citizen friends see one of their group in the hospital, and he’s suffering greatly. He’s also terminally ill, dying, and has no chance to get better (or so they tell you). The friends discuss it and two of them want to kill the sick man so that he is “put out of his misery.” Soon, they convince the rest of their small circle of friends, some of whom are reluctant, to participate in killing–no, murdering!–their friend. One of them, a retired veterinarian, tells them what poison to use, and another creates a Dr.-Kevorkian-style machine to administer the poison. They sneak into the hospital and murder their sick friend.
Soon, news spread throughout their senior citizens’ housing community that they’ve killed their friend. Suddenly, many other residents want the group to kill their sick wives, husbands, and selves. And after a very quick hesitation, they are soon videotaping the good-byes of other seniors and killing them. The wife of one of the group is suddenly forgetting things and doing things that are dangerous as a result. She clearly has Alzheimer’s Disease. So, now, the dilemma is whether or not she should be next.
Inserted into all of this killing is a musical number, with various members of the group and those who want their help, singing some song about it all. And, then, there is also a scene of the members of the group sitting naked in a greenhouse, something I really didn’t need to see. We don’t know if these Israeli actors are members of SAG [Screen Actors Guild], but they are definitely members of sag.
I’m proudly pro-life, and so is the Jewish religion, despite what legions of ignorant, liberal Jewish morons might tell you. And, so, it was incredibly annoying when the people in this dumb propaganda film kept invoking the word, “mitzvah,” which means good deed (or, literally, commandment) in Hebrew and in Judaism. In fact, it is a mitzvah–or commandment–in Judaism NOT to perpetrate euthanasia. Because, again, Judaism is a pro-life religion, which forbids poisoning the sick, including the terminally ill.
In Hebrew with English subtitles.
THREE MARXES PLUS ONE ISIS BEHEADING
karlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgplus.jpgisisbeheading
Watch the trailer . . .

* “Madame Bovary“: I’m not exactly sure why this movie needed to be made, given that this must be the zillionth on-screen (both movies and TV) depiction of Gustave Flaubert’s novel of the same name. It’s been done . . . to death, but Hollywood’s annoying habit is to lather, rinse, repeat (with an emphasis on the “repeat” part). It’s also a novel which I’m proud to say I never read, but I knew what it was about before seeing this. If the movie is true to the novel, I didn’t miss much. And, from what I’ve read about the novel, this cuts a lot out of that, but still has the main gist of it. While I loved the beautiful cinematography and period costumes and knickknacks, that’s about all I liked in it. The story is miserable, and in this movie, it’s slow and boring, making it all the more miserable. Not much actually happens until almost an hour (or halfway) into the movie. And even then it still moves slowly. Things might have been moved along if less of the details of the novel had been cut out.
In case you aren’t familiar with the story, Madame Bovary (Mia Wasikowska) is a French woman who marries a small town doctor. She is bored with life and seeks solace in having extra-marital affairs and spending all of her husband’s money on extravagant clothing and accoutrements they cannot afford. Not sure what the point of that is or why the story needs to be retold on the silver screen yet again. When the novel debuted in the mid 1800s, this might have been a big deal. Today, it’s just another re-telling of the same old story we’ve seen repeatedly. Moreover, the part about the doctor’s first wife and his background are completely gone from the movie, as is how he met Madame Bovary. And I believe this takes away from the story.
The acting in the movie was fine. But I was unsure why some characters in the movie, particularly the Aussie Wasikowska playing Madame Bovary, had American accents, and others, such as a character played by American Paul Giamatti, had English accents. It is even more odd, given that the story takes place in France, and all of the characters are supposed to be French.
I probably wouldn’t pay ten bucks-plus to see this. Or the two hours, which should have moved a little faster. Or a half hour could have been excised, and we’d have missed nothing. In fact, some of it seems a little too repetitive. Oh, and by the way, not only is this miserable, it’s a miserable chick flick, which makes it even worse. So, guys, you’d be best advised: stay away.
ONE MARX
karlmarxmovies.jpg
Watch the trailer . . .

* “The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared“: A very old, but very lucid and independent Swedish man discovers that a wolf (or fox?) has killed his dear pet cat. And, so, he makes a bomb with hot dogs (or sausages?) tied all around it, blowing up the wolf (or fox). Because of that, he’s put in a nursing home. But he’s bored and feels he doesn’t belong there And, on his 100th birthday, the Swedish man decides that nursing home life is not for him. So, he sneaks out of his first story window and embarks on an adventure, taking a bus to the most distant location he can afford, which turns out to be the countryside not far away.
We learn in interspersed flashbacks that he’s already lived a long life of adventure. He’s obsessed with explosives and is something of an expert on the subject. He’s also worked as a welder on New York high rises, served as a double agent for the CIA and the Soviets, working on the Manhattan Project, befriending President Truman and Spain’s Francisco Franco, and so on. I felt like I was watching a mixture of a low-rent Forrest Gump and a mobster caper in which all the gangsters are idiots.
The rest of the plot: the 100-year-old man is being sought out and chased by a group of mobsters who are also in a motorcycle gang, called “Never Again” (which is weird since that is the slogan many Jews use in commemorating the Holocaust). The reason: the old man has–through a mishap–ended up with the mobsters’ suitcase that has something of great value in it. Through the story, the old man picks up new friends and helpers while being sought by both the mobsters and the police.
While there are some parts that are entertaining and funny, it’s mostly hard to believe and mostly a bore. I also didn’t care for the scene making Ronald Reagan look like a jerk. That was completely gratuitous and added nothing to the story. But it’s no surprise it’s in there, given that this is based on a best-selling novel by novelist Jonas Jonasson who hails from socialist Sweden.
Mildly entertaining, but mostly a waste of time and not something I’d spend the money or time to see, given what I know now. If you’ve seen Forrest Gump, you’ve seen the original–and far superior–version. The movie is mostly in Swedish, with English subtitles. But there is also a great deal of English and Russian (also with English subtitles).
ONE MARX
karlmarxmovies.jpg
Watch the trailer (NSFW) . . .